Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
My group will be investigating how the changing of speed affects the impact force
of the moving vehicle. Speed is a major factor in a collision. The result of a crash
depends on how fast the vehicle was travelling. Force of impact is the force
generated when objects meet, as the faster you drive, the greater the impact of
your vehicle
Variables
Justification
Independent Variable
Dependent Variable
Controlled Variable
Distance (cm)
Controlled Variable
I chose this to be my
independent variable because
when I change the heights of
the ramp, the speed of the car
will also be changed when it is
rolling down because the
books that the ramp rests on
will make the ramp higher
I chose this to be my
dependent variable because I
can measure how strong the
impact force was by measuring
the depth of penetration to the
plasticine by the moving car
I will not change the distance
the car will be able to travel, it
will only stay 152cm so it could
be a fair test when the car
collides into the plasticine.
The mass of the car will stay
the same to avoid extra
changing of the travelling
speeds (1.95kg)
Controlled Variable
Surface of Ramp
Hypothesis: I think that the higher the ramp is, the stronger the amount of impact
force will be. The chopstick will make a deeper hole in the plasticine. And the
lower the ramp is, the lesser the amount of impact force will be because the
higher the altitude, the stronger the force of gravity which will be pulling the car
down- in this case, rolling down a ramp.
Rindeth
Apparatus:
-1 flat wooden block,
- 1 toy car,
- a few books of the same thicknesses,
- A meter rule
- 1 square block of plasticine (15cmx15cmx3cm)
- a chopstick
- a marker
- a whiteboard
How to control controlled variables: use the same block of wood for the ramp,
use the same exact toy car, the same type of surface the car is run on, the same
type of plasticine the car will be collided with
Procedure:
- Put the wooden ramp on top of some books (measured height) in front of
a free smooth surface for travelling of the car.
- Strongly tape a chopstick to the bottom of the car in a way that the top of
the chopstick sticks out in front of the car.
- Put a block of plasticine in front of the bottom of the ramp.
- Put the car on top of the ramp and let it go down without pushing (as this
will alter the size of the force)
- There will be a hole inside the plasticine caused by the chopstick that was
attached to the car poking out.
- Take a marker and mark the point the chopstick went in the plasticine.
- Measure it with a ruler and note it down in a notebook or on a whiteboard.
- Adjust the height of the ramp to a taller height by adding more and more
books.
- Continue the process of letting the car fall at different heights and
measuring them.
- Record them all in a data table below.
Rindeth
3.5
1st Try
0.4
2nd Try
0.5
3rd Try
0.3
Average
0.4
7.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
10.5
1.8
1.2
1.6
14.0
1.8
1.8
1.5
1.7
17.5
2.4
2.5
2.5
2.4
Conclusion: The graph above shows that the higher the height of the ramp is
(where we let the car roll down) the deeper the depth of the plasticine made by
Rindeth
the chopstick is. This is due to the force of gravity acting on the speed of the car
as the altitude increases. The higher the altitude, the stronger the force of gravity
will act on the car.
My hypothesis is that the higher the height of where the car is being placed, the
stronger the force of gravity will be which will increase the speed of the car when
rolling down which will make a deeper hole in the plasticine. My graph does
support my hypothesis as the heights of the ramp increased (x-axis which the
points go from left to right), the depth of the plasticine made by the chopstick also
increased (y-axis which the points go from bottom to top to show the increasing
depth of the plasticine). My data points were very close to the trend line and it
shows a positive correlation between the height of the ramp and the depth of the
plasticine made. All data points followed the trend. The minimum range is in a
small size as the height of the ramp wasnt that high. The maximum range is in a
bigger size, as the height of the ramp was relatively high too compared to the
shorter heights.
The results did show that all of the data did agree with my hypothesis as it was
shown in the tables and graphs above.
Improvements:
Issue
Impact
Improvement
Rindeth
Extensions: For next time, I could do each experiment in 5 tries instead of 3 tries.