Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Discuss the societal impact of a major national program to develop synthetic fuel (liquid
and gaseous) from coal. (It has been estimated that to reach the level of supply equal to the
imports from OPEC countries would require over 50 installations, each costing several
billion dollars)
There are lots of Pros and Cons in developing synthetic fuel. The societal impact
that it brings, especially when it is a major national program will be discussed
further here in this blog.
Among the benefits are:
a) JOB OPPORTUNITIES
The development of synthetic fuel will surely require lots of new
infrastructures and research, thus creating new job opportunities for the
people. This can certainly be a catalyst for the economy of the country grows.
For example, in Malaysia, the creating of their own brand of national car has
created lots of jobs for their people. The manufacturing process of building a
car requires lots of parts. Meaning that a lot of people will be involved in the
process thus creating lots of jobs
b) NEW MARKET
As of now, synthetic fuel is not widely used due the easily available crude oil.
Thus, by developing this branch of energy, there can a lot of advantages by
being one of the first movers in the market. Though there has been some
objection due to the steep price needed to extract these fuel, a recent
Princeton article suggested that if the price of crude oil per barrel stays within
the 60 -100 per dollar, the synthetic fuel can still be productive.
Even synthetic fuel is not a new idea anymore; nevertheless this concept has not been
wholly used yet. Thus, most people think that this field will not be a great deal in the
future in which has caused less people to be interested in majoring in this scope.
Synthetic fuel can still be considered as a new development in the field because research
and investment still need to be done in order to make the production economically viable.
Because the number of the workers that specialized in this field is less, the development
of the synthetic fuel is not expected as it should be.
Do you feel there is a basic difference in the perception by society of the impact of a
synthetic fuel program compared with the impact of nuclear energy? Why?
Yes, there is a basic difference in the perception by society of the synthetic fuel and nuclear
energy. The reasons are as followed:
a) Negative mind set of society about nuclear energy
Society's mindset about nuclear energy is focusing only on bomb as a weapon. Besides,
the way nuclear energy projects are implemented makes it difficult for civil society to
feel associated with its benefits, and thereby to accept its risks. Nuclear energy projects
give an image of benefiting only companies, utilities, and their shareholders, while
society, especially local population, is subjected to the burdens and risks associated with
the construction and operation of industrial facilities. Furthermore, irresponsible
company that release nuclear radiation around the surrounding lead people to thinks that
there are no benefits of implementing the nuclear as an energy resource .In addition, there
is no alternative from the company that run the nuclear project to avoid the bad effects of
nuclear on environment and people health.