Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
IMPLEMENTATION OF
INDUCTIVE CORPUS-BASED
GRAMMAR INSTRUCTION
A REPORT FROM THE CLASSROOM
CORPUS-RESEARCH IN THE
CLASSROOM REQUIRES:
1. Sufficient preparation
2. Sufficient mediation
3. Sufficient justification
6. Can you make any conclusions about what the different modal
verbs on this worksheet are used for? Discuss your findings
with your partner and share them with the class.
*Instructors without computer and/or internet access can do a similar activity with
printed lists of concordances-in-context such as the one above. Students can fill
out the worksheet (next slide) by hand using such a print-out.
Should
Would/
would like
to
Could
May
Might
Must
Can
Need(s)to/
needed to
Have to/
has to/ had
to
Prediction
Permission Possibility
Necessity
Recommendation
CONCLUSIONS
Tentative guidelines for using inductive CBI in the ESL classroom:
1. Inductive, corpus-based learning must occur in a student-centred,
curiosity-fostering environment with appropriate scaffolding and
support.
2. The purpose and potential benefits of inductive CBI must be made
clear to students.
3. Students should be encouraged to take on a critical, functional
view of grammar. While this may be a natural result of CBI, explicit
emphasis on this point may make some students more receptive to
CBI.
4. Instructors must prepare sufficiently by experimenting with queries
prior to class.
5. Instructors must provide technical and linguistic support,
appropriate sequencing of simple to complex activities, support
with the transition to inductive learning, and support in developing
critical thinking and research skills.
REFERENCES
Bagheri, M. S., & Aeen, L. (2011). The impact of practicing autonomy on the writing proficiency of Iranian
intermediate EFL learners. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 113.
Jean, G., & Simard, D. (2013). Deductive versus inductive grammar instruction: Investigating possible
relationships between gains, preferences and learning styles. System, 41(4), 10231042.
doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.10.008
Liu, D. (2011). Making grammar instruction more empowering: An exploratory case study of corpus use in the
learning / teaching of grammar review of the literature: Theoretical Framework for the Approach, 45(4), 353378.
Liu, D., & Jiang, P. (2009). Using a corpus-based lexicogrammatical approach to grammar instruction in EFL and
ESL contexts. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 6178.
Mall-amiri, B., & Sheikhy, F. (2014). The comparative impact of autonomy and critical thinking on EFL learners
writing achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(5), 903916. doi:10.4304/tpls.4.5.903-916
Ngurah, I. P., & Myartawan, W. (2013). The correlation between learner autonomy and English proficiency of
Indonesian EFL college learners. TEFLIN Journal, 24(1), 6382.
Vannestl, M. E., & Lindquist, H. (2007). Learning English grammar with a corpus: Experimenting with
concordancing in a university grammar course. ReCALL, 19(03), 329. doi:10.1017/S0958344007000638
Vyatkina, N. (2013). Discovery learning and teaching with electronic corpora in an advanced German grammar
course. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 46(1), 4461. doi:10.1111/tger.10128