Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc. Doc.

21
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 21 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 1 of 2

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
4

5 OVERTURE SERVICES, INC., a No. C02-01991 CRB

Delaware Corporation,
6 STIPULATION SELECTING ADR
Plaintiff,
PROCESS [ADR L.R. 3-5]
7
vs.
8 ADR CERTIFICATION
GOOGLE INC., a California Corporation,
9
Defendant.
10

11

12 The parties stipulate to participate in the following ADR process:

13 Court Processes:

14 Arbitration ENE Mediation

15 Private Processes:

16 X Private ADR (Private Mediation)

17 The parties agree that mediation would be most useful if scheduled around the time

18 of, but prior to, the Court’s claim construction hearing.

19

20 Dated: August 5, 2002 By: /s/

Jack C. Berenzweig
21 BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE
Attorney for Plaintiff
22 OVERTURE SERVICES, INC.
23
Dated: August 5, 2002 By: /s/
24 Jon B. Streeter
KEKER & VAN NEST, L.L.P.
25 Attorney for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.
26

27

28

Dockets.Justia.com
 Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 21 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 2 of 2

1 SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES

AND LEAD TRIAL COUNSEL
2

3 Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 16 and ADR L.R. 3-5(b), each of the undersigned certifies

4 that he or she has read either the handbook entitled “Dispute Resolution Procedures in

5 the Northern District of California,” or the specified portions of the ADR Unit’s Internet

6 site <www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov>, discussed the available dispute resolution options

7 provided by the court and private entities, and considered whether this case might

8 benefit from any of them.

10 Dated: August 5, 2002 By: /s/

Jeanine Hayes
11 OVERTURE SERVICES, INC.
12

13 Dated: August 5, 2002 By: /s/

Jack C. Berenzweig
14 BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE
Attorney for Plaintiff
15 OVERTURE SERVICES, INC.
16

17 Dated: August 5, 2002 By: /s/

David Drummond
18 GOOGLE INC.
19
20 Dated: August 5, 2002 By: /s/
Jon B. Streeter
21 KEKER & VAN NEST, L.L.P.
Attorney for Defendant
22 GOOGLE INC.
23 I hereby attest, pursuant to section X of General Order 45, that concurrence in

24 the filing of this document has been obtained from Jeanine Hayes, David Drummond,

25 and Jon B. Streeter.

26 Dated: August 5, 2002 By: /s/

Jack C. Berenzweig
27 BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE
Attorney for Plaintiff
28 OVERTURE SERVICES, INC.
STIPULATING SELECTING ADR PROCESS AND -2-
ADR CERTIFICATION