Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Score:
30
3
Description
Thorough description
that demonstrates
understanding of the
chosen genetic
advancement, student
uses own words
Student offers a
complete
description of
the chosen
advancement
and is able to
explain their
research in their
own words.
Influence Student is Student is able
able to articulate and
to thoughtful and
describe how the
thoroughly
chosen advancement
describe how the
has influenced the
chosen
study of human
advancement
genetics
has influenced
the study of
human genetics
Example
Student gives an
example of a scientific
study or experiment
that demonstrates the
chosen advancement
2
Student
includes a
short
description but
lacks details or
a thorough
understanding
of the chosen
advancement.
Student
includes a brief
description of
how the
chosen
advancement
has influenced
the study of
human
genetics.
Student lacks
a thorough
description
and or does
not use own
words.
No
description
is included.
Student is not
able to
articulate how
their chosen
advancement
has influenced
the study of
human
genetics.
Not
included.
Not
included.
Video A relevant
video is included to
further the
understanding of the
genetic advancement
Student is able
to give an
example and
includes a
website about a
scientific study
or experiment
that
demonstrates
the chosen
advancement.
Student includes
a link or QR code
to a relevant
video about the
chosen topic.
Not
Included
Student includes
one relevant
Student
includes a
Student
includes a
video that is
not relevant to
the chosen
topic.
Student
includes a
Not
included.
included
photo with a
caption.
Citations Citations
are included for all
information, pictures,
and videos
Visual Appearance
Chosen medium is
pleasing to the eyes,
colors are used,
organized layout,
neat, easy to read and
understand
Creativity Student
was creative and
project is unique
Citations are
included.
Project is turned in
on-time
Rubric Name must
be written on rubric
relevant photo
without a
caption
One citation is
missing.
photo that is
not relevant.
More than one
citation is
missing.
Not
included.
Project is visually
appealing; colors
are used, well
organized, neat
and is easily
read.
Missing 1-2
components.
Missing 3-4
components.
Missing 5 or
more
components
.
Student was
creative and the
project was
unique
Turned in on
February 25,
2015
Missing one
component.
Rubric is
included when
project is turned
in.
Not
creative.
Not turned
in on
February
25, 2015
Rubric is
not
included.