Global History/All Faculty

Group Member Names:

PROJECT PRESENTATION RUBRIC

Aspects of Project
Organization

Creativity
& Visual Aids

Group Participation/
Quality of Interaction

Speaking
Skills

Content
Accuracy

Total Points:

Material clearly related to

topic; content was presented
in logical sequence; flowed
together well; strong opening
and closing

Material mostly related to

topic; content was presented
in mostly logical sequence;
flowed together fairly well;
fairly strong opening and
closing
Some originality in
presentation of material;
captured audience attention
most of the time; good
variety of visuals used and
were appropriate

Material somewhat related

to topic; content was
presented in inadequate
sequence; flowed together
poorly; weak opening or
closing
Little originality in
presentation of material;
captured audience attention
some of the time; little
variety of visuals and were
somewhat inappropriate

Material unrelated to
topic; little thought given
to sequence of content;
repetitive; transitions
choppy; lacked opening or
closing
Little thought given to
presentation of material;
captured audience
attention little of the
time; lacked variety of
visuals and/or were
inappropriate

Material unrelated to topic;

no thought given to
sequence of content;
repetitive; transitions
choppy or disjointed; lacked
opening and/or closing
No thought given to
presentation of material;
did not capture audience
attention; lacked variety or
had no visuals and/or were
inappropriate

All students enthusiastically

participated; students
reflected awareness of
others views and opinions;
each student assigned a
clearly defined role; group
members performed roles
effectively
Poised, clear articulation;
proper volume; steady rate
of speaking; good eye
contact; enthusiastic;
confident

At least of students
actively participated;
students showed adeptness in
interacting; each student
assigned a role but not
clearly defined or
consistently adhered to

At least half of students

participated; some ability
to interact; students
assigned roles but were not
consistently adhered

Only one or two students

participated; little
interaction; some students
disinterested; little effort
made to assign roles to
group members

Heavily reliant upon one

person; little interaction;
some students disinterested
or distracted;no effort
made to assign roles to
group members

Clear articulation but not

polished; volume & rate of
speaking fluctuated; some
eye contact; some
enthusiasm & confidence

Some mumbling; volume

uneven; little eye contact
or enthusiasm

Speaking inaudible or too

loud; very little eye
contact; rate too slow;
speaker seemed
uninterested

All facts were precise and

detailed; showed evidence of
thorough knowledge of the
time period; offered indepth analysis

Most facts were precise and

detailed; showed some
evidence of knowledge of the
time period; offered some
in-depth analysis

Some facts were precise

and detailed; showed little
evidence of knowledge of
the time period; offered
little in-depth analysis

Few facts were precise

and detailed; showed little
evidence of knowledge of
the time period; offered
little in-depth analysis

Speaking inaudible or too

loud; no eye contact; back
to audience most of time;
rate very slow; speaker
seemed completely
uninterested
Facts were not precise nor
detailed; showed no
evidence of knowledge of
the time period; offered no
in-depth analysis

Very original presentation of

material; captured audience
attention throughout; use of
visuals was varied and
appropriate

________ x _____ ( # of members) =

Comments: