TABLE 21 Comparison of Exact and Approximate Values of Maximum Directivity for U = cos" # Power Patterns Exact Kraus Tai and Pereira Equation Equation Kraus Equation ” (2.22) (2-26) % Error (2-30a) 1 4 286 28.50 253 2 6 5.09 =15.27 449 3 8 135 8.12 648 4 10 961 848 5 2 11.87 =1.08 1047 6 4 14.13 40.93 12.46 7 16 1639 4248 1447 8 18 18.66 43.68 1647 9 20 2093 +464 1847 10 2 19 4541 2047 1128 24.56 26.08 46.24 23.02 Is 32 34.52 4788 3046 20 2 45.89 49.26 40.46 1000 7 000 OF pore mat 00 kr. 2-25) Jho903 = = py Tai & Pee, 2-30 2 a) mas 2 0 ed 2 nn & z “ é soo ram S S rom & a os am 2 2301 100 2000 sa ST S00 as 50 ‘ wo 1D SSS RST HPBW (deers) Figure 216 Comparison of exact and approximate values of directivity for directional U = cos" # power pattems.2001 — D, (exact) oe Di, cbenalatg2-2) asi q ~7> Do (Porat)(Eq. 2-336) ~ i 46 : uaure wn 8 5 s woo § pm § a 78 i oe sor ™ 50 100) 150° 200 2S0 30S aS dt ts Od a PBW (degrees) Figure 2.18 Comparison of exact and approximate values of directivity for omnidirectional U = sin" @ power patterns.