Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The educational approach for this project was centered on the age of the children. The
38 students at the preschool were both male and female, and ranged from ages 4-5 years old.
At the age of 4 to 5 years, language, cognitive, and social milestones include:
Language Milestones
Cognitive Milestones
2. Speaks sentences of
more than five words
3. Uses future tense
4. Tells longer stories
Social/Emotional
Milestones
1. Wants to please friends
2. Wants to be like friends
3. More likely to agree to
rules
4. Likes to sing, dance,
and act
5. Shows independence
6. Able to distinguish
fantasy from reality
7. Aware of sexuality
8. Sometimes demanding,
sometimes eagerly
cooperative
o
o
o
o
Program Implementation
Implementing our public health project, we decided on two visits for the children, one to
pretest and have the hands on activity, and another to post test. The test questions included:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Overall, the children responded very well to the questions, but there was some ciaos while
asking, making recording the statistics of kids who knew the answers vs the kids that did not
know the answers difficult. We invited the students to raise their hands if they knew what the
answer was to the question asked, and counted how many had their hands up, but many of the
children yelled out the answers while having their hands up. They were a very excited and
enthusiastic group of children. After taking answers to the questions and providing feedback
and reinforcement, we had the children divide into groups for our activity.
The experiment we chose for the students was to show the effect of brushing for the full
two minutes, while also showing the motion for brushing, which is small circles. We used a
hard-boiled egg that had been boiled with a tea bag that stained it brown. The students were
broken up into 6 groups. Each group was given a toothbrush with toothpaste and the kids were
instructed to remove the stain. We informed the kids that if they did not brush their teeth, they
would turn brown and yucky like the egg. The stain did not come off easily. We reinforced the
importance of brushing for two minutes because brushing the egg just one time with the
toothbrush did not remove the stain.
After our experiment, we questioned the children about nutrition. The children were
asked what foods were good and bad for their teeth. Many of the children could name foods
that were good, including fruits like apples, oranges, and bananas. They also named
vegetables such as broccoli, carrots, and corn. When asked about what foods are bad for their
teeth, they mostly named cookies and candy. We wanted to reinforce that soda also has sugar
and acid. The children did not know what acid was, and we explained that acid is found in
really sugary things, like soda, and can cause holes in your teeth. We also asked the kids if
any of them had ever had a cavity. Some of the children spoke out and reported that their
parents had cavities. We explained that having a lot of acid and sugar can cause cavities.
Another question that was reviewed was if any of the kids had been to the dentist before. A
majority of the student raised their hands. Most of them also reported having a good
experience at the dentist. At the end of our time together, the kids were provided with a
coloring sheet for homework. The children were very informed about oral health care and I
believe that the pretest was successful in reinforcing information for the children for the post
test.
The post test was performed the same as the pretest, verbally. Joslyn and Batool asked
the students the same questions as before, and we saw an overall better response from the
children. There was also a nutritional game played where the children had to choose which
foods were bad and good from pictures provided. The kids fully understood the importance of
sugar and acid from the results of the game. Emphasizing the importance that the parents
need to be involved with their oral health routine at home, the children were provided with
patient bags and information for the parents on proper oral hygiene for kids.
Test Results
4
Table 1.1
Questions
All students
All students
All
Conclusion
Education is key to successful patient oral health. The public health project allowed for
collaborated organizing and implementing of objectives for an adolescent population.
Reinforcement of oral hygiene instruction and nutrition will allow for a lifetime of healthy habits.
Implementation of the project was arranged to accommodate the average milestones of 4-5
year old children. I believe that the verbal questioning and teaching, along with the visual
aspects like the experiments, coloring, and patient hygiene bag, allowed for the positive results
and better learning outcomes seen in our project.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
http://www.adha.org/adha-emphasize-early-education-proper-oral-health-regimen
http://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/hygiene/disease/dental_caries.html
http://www.cda.org/Portals/0/pdfs/untreated_disease.pdf
http://www.healthychildren.org/English/ages-stages/preschool/Pages/DevelopmentalMilestones-4-to-5-Year-Olds.aspx
The group for the public health project was myself, Batool Muhmad, Joslyn Vaccaro,
and Lindsay King. Overall, we worked very well together in planning and implementing the
lesson plan for the kids. We all decided as a group that we wanted to focus our project on the
adolescent population. Joslyn had set up the initial place where we would be teaching children,
but there was a number of problems that occurred between that location and our schedule. I
was contacted by Ms. Johnson, one of the teachers at St. Marys preschool, to teach her kids
on oral health. Again, there was difficulty with scheduling but eventually, my group and Ms.
Johnson could work out a time to meet. Due to scheduling, we decided to split our group and
day one, Lindsay and I performed the pretest and experiment, and day two Joslyn and Batool
did the post test, nutrition game, and patient bags. We all were involved equally in sharing
responsibilities for the objectives and obtaining all the materials. However, Lindsay was the
one to come up with the experiment, which was beneficial for the group. We collaborated
through email of our findings from the pretest. In general, this group worked very well together.
7