Discourse Abstracts: Assessing your work

#2

COMPLETE
Collector: UC abstracts English (Web Link)
Started: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 11:09:41 AM
Last Modified: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 12:07:24 PM
Time Spent: 00:57:43
IP Address: 129.137.197.27

PAGE 1: Introduction to this Assessment Tool

Q1: Add your name

Sarah Trevino

PAGE 2: Winston Intro Bio

Q2: What was your original abstract for this text?

Respondent skipped this

question

Q3: Assess your abstract using this scale, with NA

meaning you didn't prepare an abstract, and
progressing to 5, meaning it is very effective.

Respondent skipped this

question

Q4: If your assessment was between 0-3, discuss

why you assessed it that way and how you would
revise it to be assessed between 4-5.If your
assessment was more than 3, discuss why you
assessed it that way, including specific examples to
support your assessment.

Respondent skipped this

question

PAGE 3: Eric Argumentative

Q5: What was your original abstract for this text?

Respondent skipped this

question

Q6: Assess your abstract using this scale, with NA

meaning you didn't prepare an abstract, and
progressing to 5, meaning it is very effective.

Respondent skipped this

question

Q7: If your assessment was between 0-3, discuss

why you assessed it that way and how you would
revise it to be assessed between 4-5.If your
assessment was more than 3, discuss why you
assessed it that way, including specific examples to
support your assessment.

Respondent skipped this

question

PAGE 4: Eric Explanatory

Q8: What was your original abstract for this text?

Respondent skipped this

question

Q9: Assess your abstract using this scale, with NA

meaning you didn't prepare an abstract, and
progressing to 5, meaning it is very effective.

Respondent skipped this

question

Q10: If your assessment was between 0-3, discuss

why you assessed it that way and how you would
revise it to be assessed between 4-5.If your
assessment was more than 3, discuss why you
assessed it that way, including specific examples to
support your assessment.

Respondent skipped this

question

PAGE 5: Dare to Disagree

Q11: What was your original abstract for this text?

Challenges are the key to effective development
Q12: Assess your abstract using this scale, with NA meaning you didn't prepare an abstract, and
progressing to 5, meaning it is very effective.
My original abstract

4. Is very close to capturing the complete

spirit!

Q13: If your assessment was between 0-3, discuss why you assessed it that way and how you would
revise it to be assessed between 4-5.If your assessment was more than 3, discuss why you assessed
it that way, including specific examples to support your assessment.
The woman who was working to cure childhood cancers was challenged by not only curing childhood cancer,
but also by her partner and it was his challenging of her work that led her to push harder and further agreed!
what are specific examples from your language that expressed this clearly?

PAGE 6: Teddy Bear

Q14: What was your original abstract for this text?

Media and changes over time can manipulate our feelings
Q15: Assess your abstract using this scale, with NA meaning you didn't prepare an abstract, and
progressing to 5, meaning it is very effective.
My original abstract

4. Is very close to capturing the complete

spirit!

Discourse Abstracts: Assessing your work

Q16: If your assessment was between 0-3, discuss why you assessed it that way and how you would
revise it to be assessed between 4-5.If your assessment was more than 3, discuss why you assessed
it that way, including specific examples to support your assessment.
It was the media that led to the softening of animals into not a dangerous wild animal but a cuddly friend
what are specific examples from your language and why isnt it rated a 4?

PAGE 7: Does closed captioning still serve

Q17: What was your original abstract for this text?

Closed Captioning has come a long way, but still has a long way to go
Q18: Assess your abstract using this scale, with NA meaning you didn't prepare an abstract, and
progressing to 5, meaning it is very effective.
My original abstract

4. Is very close to capturing the complete

spirit!

Q19: If your assessment was between 0-3, discuss why you assessed it that way and how you would
revise it to be assessed between 4-5.If your assessment was more than 3, discuss why you assessed
it that way, including specific examples to support your assessment.
Needs more of the persuasive aspect of the textjustify your decisions with specific examples

PAGE 8: Conceptual Teaching

Q20: What was your original abstract for this text?

Making connections to real life situations can aid in student learning
Q21: Assess your abstract using this scale, with NA meaning you didn't prepare an abstract, and
progressing to 5, meaning it is very effective.
My original abstract

5. Captures the spirit and intent!

Q22: If your assessment was between 0-3, discuss why you assessed it that way and how you would
revise it to be assessed between 4-5.If your assessment was more than 3, discuss why you assessed
it that way, including specific examples to support your assessment.
Captures the spirit of how connecting classroom work to peoples real life issues helps their learning
agreed-you need to discuss how your language does this

PAGE 9: Social Studies

Q23: What was your original abstract for this text?

Discourse Abstracts: Assessing your work

It is important to understand history

Q24: Assess your abstract using this scale, with NA meaning you didn't prepare an abstract, and
progressing to 5, meaning it is very effective.
My original abstract

4. Is very close to capturing the complete

spirit!

Q25: If your assessment was between 0-3, discuss why you assessed it that way and how you would
revise it to be assessed between 4-5.If your assessment was more than 3, discuss why you assessed
it that way, including specific examples to support your assessment.
Needs something more about succeeding or doing wellspecific examples needed

PAGE 10: Health Class

Q26: What was your original abstract for this text?

health class covers a variety of subjects
Q27: Assess your abstract using this scale, with NA meaning you didn't prepare an abstract, and
progressing to 5, meaning it is very effective.
My original abstract

2. Is succinct, but describes content rather

than capturing spirit

Q28: If your assessment was between 0-3, discuss why you assessed it that way and how you would
revise it to be assessed between 4-5.If your assessment was more than 3, discuss why you assessed
it that way, including specific examples to support your assessment.
Needs more description or expansions on idea

PAGE 11: Tom Snyder with Deborah Tannen

Q29: What was your original abstract for this text?

The way people communicate with each other may depend on a variety of factors not limited to gender,
location where they grew up and style
Q30: Assess your abstract using this scale, with NA meaning you didn't prepare an abstract, and
progressing to 5, meaning it is very effective.
My original abstract

2. Is succinct, but describes content rather

than capturing spirit

Q31: If your assessment was between 0-3, discuss why you assessed it that way and how you
would revise it to be assessed between 4-5.If your assessment was more than 3, discuss why you
assessed it that way, including specific examples to support your assessment.
Needs first person and ideas instead of complete content

Discourse Abstracts: Assessing your work

PAGE 12: Other Abstract

Q32: What was your original abstract for this text?

When analyzing others work its good to keep a clear idea of what youre analyzing
Q33: Assess your abstract using this scale, with NA meaning you didn't prepare an abstract, and
progressing to 5, meaning it is very effective.
My original abstract

4. Is very close to capturing the complete

spirit!

Q34: If your assessment was between 0-3, discuss why you assessed it that way and how you would
revise it to be assessed between 4-5.If your assessment was more than 3, discuss why you assessed
it that way, including specific examples to support your assessment.
Needs something to more clearly explain the projectwhat? Justify your decision

PAGE 13: Other Abstract

Q35: What was your original abstract for this text?

Where youre going may not always be where youre headed
Q36: Assess your abstract using this scale, with NA meaning you didn't prepare an abstract, and
progressing to 5, meaning it is very effective.
My original abstract

4. Is very close to capturing the complete

spirit!

Q37: If your assessment was between 0-3, discuss why you assessed it that way and how you would
revise it to be assessed between 4-5.If your assessment was more than 3, discuss why you assessed
it that way, including specific examples to support your assessment.
I think that it makes sense and captures the spirit but needs something more
why? Justify your decisions

PAGE 14: Other Abstract

Q38: What was your original abstract for this text?

N/A
Q39: Assess your abstract using this scale, with NA meaning you didn't prepare an abstract, and
progressing to 5, meaning it is very effective.
My original abstract

0. N/A

11 / 108

Discourse Abstracts: Assessing your work

Q40: If your assessment was between 0-3, discuss why you assessed it that way and how you would
revise it to be assessed between 4-5.If your assessment was more than 3, discuss why you assessed
it that way, including specific examples to support your assessment.
N/A

PAGE 15: Dare to Disagree

Q41: What was your original abstract for this text?

N/A
Q42: Assess your abstract using this scale, with NA meaning you didn't prepare an abstract, and
progressing to 5, meaning it is very effective.
My original abstract

0. N/A

Q43: If your assessment was between 0-3, discuss why you assessed it that way and how you would
revise it to be assessed between 4-5.If your assessment was more than 3, discuss why you assessed
it that way, including specific examples to support your assessment.
N/A