Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Description of Data:
Class of 2015/2016
Honors Science Students
Science OAA - Grade 5
Science OAA - Grade 8
OGT Practice - Grade 9
OGT - Grade 10
ACT - Grade 10 - 12
63 Total Students
Subgroup Analysis:
All Students - My students consist of 11th and 12th
graders enrolled in honors courses including
Chemistry, Physics and Advanced Placement
Chemistry. 78% of my students are White/Caucasian,
11% are Multiracial, 8% are African American and 3%
are Asian or Pacific Islander. On average on all
standard science assessments from 5th grade to
present my students have earned an accelerated
rating.
Subgroup Analysis:
White/Caucasian - 78% of my students are
white and have consistently scored in the
accelerated range on state assessments in
science. My theory is that majority of my white
students come from higher socioeconomic
homes with more successful parents. Therefore
their higher test scores are the result of a
supportive home life not the color of their skin.
Subgroup Analysis:
African American - 8% of my students are
African American. This subgroup consistently
performs at a proficient level with their most
recent scores on the OGT reaching the
accelerated level. This is notably lower than the
white majority scores. However everyone of my
Black students is also economically
disadvantaged which may be an outside factor.
Subgroup Analysis:
Asian or Pacific Islander - These students
make up 3% of my population which represents
two students. Therefore there mean is greatly
deviated. One of these students is a gifted
student. The other is a student of low
socioeconomic status which had a language
barrier issue especially as a younger student.
Subgroup Analysis:
Multiracial - 11% of my students are
Multiracial. These students similar to the
African American population have been
consistently proficient with their most recent
rating being accelerated. This puts them below
white and Asian/Pacific Islander students.
Majority of students in this subgroup are
economically disadvantaged.
Subgroup Analysis:
Economically Disadvantaged - 49% of my
students are economically disadvantaged. Yet they
have scored in the accelerated range with the
exception of their 9th grade practice OGT. My only
explanation is that many of my students come from
supportive single parent homes. Therefore they
have low socioeconomic status but have the
support necessary for their education.
Subgroup Analysis:
IEP - Out of my 63 students I only have one
student on an IEP. He has consistently scored
in the proficient range on state assessments.
This student comes from a supportive home
and excels in math/sciences. His IEP limits his
writing ability.
Subgroup Analysis:
Gifted - 24% of my students are labeled as
gifted in some area. These students have
scored accelerated or advanced on all state
science assessments. Surprisingly these
students come from a variety of white, minority
and economically disadvantaged backgrounds.
Subgroup Analysis:
Male - 56% of my students are male. Their
mean score is accelerated on all state science
assessments. This aligns to the stereotype that
men are stronger in science.
Subgroup Analysis:
Female - 44% of my students are female and
their mean is proficient. Their most recent
rating was accelerated. These scores are
unfortunate as they perpetuate the stereotype
that women are not as strong in the sciences
as men. Even more odd, majority of the science
teachers at Alliance High School are women.
Interview Protocol:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
According to the science achievement data I collected and analyzed, white students
outperform all other ethnic groups. Why do you believe this to be true and how can this
achievement gap be closed?
What are Alliance High Schools greatest strengths and weaknesses in regards to equity?
Male students outperformed female students in terms of science achievement. Why do
you believe this happened and what can be done to close this achievement gap?
Do you believe teachers need professional development in order to increase their equity?
Does teacher bias negatively affect the classroom learning environment?
Our student population is diverse but our staff population is not, do you believe this
affects our minority students, why or why not?
Which subgroup if any do you worry about most in regards to achievement and why?
Is there a certain subgroup that is disciplined more? Are all subgroups disciplined in the
same manner following the same procedures?
Survey Question
% Disagree
% Agree
% Strongly
Agree
16
61.4
20.5
2.3
13.6
68.2
16
41
45.5
11.4
11.4
70.5
18.2
% Strongly
Disagree
Survey Question
% Strongly
Disagree
% Disagree
% Agree
% Strongly
Agree
6.8
72.7
20.5
13.6
72.7
13.6
20.5
68.2
11.4
18.2
54.5
22.7
4.5
2.3
50
47.7
Survey Question
% Strongly
Disagree
% Disagree
% Agree
% Strongly
Agree
4.5
63.6
31.8
11.4
72.7
16
20.5
66
13.6
2.3
20.5
63.6
13.6
41
52.3
6.8
I think that cultural, social, economic factors keep some students from trying their
best. Our students are given encouragement at school to do everything they can but
some can't escape the handicap of parents who can't/don't provide basic necessities
of life and encouragement to be what they can be. Providing excuses instead of
incentives for students to do their best is beyond the cultural experiences of some
families.
I have heard students from various backgrounds say they feel accepted here by staff
and other students.
Alliance High School is an equitable school which provides all students the chance
to excel in all domains.
Socially, I think that our school is very equitable. The students are very accepting of
other diversities.
I believe that AHS is an equitable school. The relationship between students of
varying backgrounds is very positive. I believe that our staff is very caring and fair
with students of diverse backgrounds.
No person is discriminated based upon race, creed, or color. What they the students
do with their opportunity is their own choice. We strive to put structures in place
which encourages good choices and discourages bad choices for all students.
All students are given many opportunities to learn and grow, by a highly skilled and
qualified staff. The burden to take advantage of these opportunities, in all of human
history, is, and always must be, on the student.
Of course there are areas in need of improvement, but I believe if a student:
wants/needs help, or wants to participate in a club, sport, or program, or requires
discipline, or is deserving of recognition (anything from Repin that A to academic
honors), our school does its best to look beyond race or ethnicity. The same is true
for hiring practices. Though our coaching and teaching staff may APPEAR in need
of more diversity, a district can only hire based on who applies and even then it
should be based on the best candidate.
In some areas, the numbers are not in line with our population and they could be
better. In the area of staffing, we are definitely low.
We cater to the upper students and don't care about the sped students. We say we
want all to exceed but we load the sped co taught classes with discipline issues and
separate all the top students out.
Academically, we are not as equitable. The honors/AP classes are definitely skewed
towards the white/caucasian ethnicity. Our staff is severely lacking in diversity.
I wish we addressed minority issues a little more in our training and I wish our staff
was a bit more diverse.
I do see an unequal representation of white students in advanced classes. However,
I don't believe it is the school's responsibility to make sure that all racial/ethnic
groups are represented in all areas (sports, music, AP, etc.). How can the school get
more minority students in AP classes if 1) there aren't a large number of minorities
who want to take those classes and 2) there aren't a large number qualified to take
those classes.
It is my opinion how students are treated depends on some specifics: IE- athlete
(needed for a game/event), "good kid" /slap on the wrist, there seem to be many
inconsistencies with discipline.
I think we try, but a lack of diversity in our teaching staff and administration make it
more difficult.
I think inequities in the larger community surrounding it are reflected in the school.
Alliance High school is a diverse urban school system but all survey
respondents were White/Caucasian. This is not an adequate reflection of
the Alliance community.
The parent survey requirement was not met unfortunately. This analysis is
more of a depiction of Alliance staff perspectives.
A wide age range was surveyed but it would be interesting to get a student
perspective on this survey.
One of the most polar questions was, This school provides staff with
the materials, resources, and training needed to effectively work with
diverse students. with 41% Disagreeing, 52.3% Agreeing and 6.8%
Strongly Agreeing. This stresses a lack of professional development in the
area of diverse students.
The most positive response from the survey was to the question The
Alliance High School staff is respectful of all students regardless of
their race, ethnicity or socioeconomic status with 2.3% disagreeing,
50% agreeing and 47.7% strongly agreeing. This reflects Alliance High
schools equitable treatment of all students.
The most negative response from the survey was to the question The
Alliance High School staff has equal representation of various
ethnicities and backgrounds with 18.2% strongly disagreeing, 54.5%
disagreeing, 22.7% agreeing and 4.5% strongly agreeing. I find this data
perplexing as Alliance High school has only White teachers. For the
respondents that did agree, did they decide to answer based on whether a
diverse staff is necessary? The fact is we have no minority teachers.
Areas of Strength:
Areas of Weakness:
Plan of Action: