ae I
ie ae NaS
1 NS
: NN
Se ee | te NA
eee ee @ WS y)
paeaneenteontoanabierrnee | NS
eee NS
Ce ee ce es ae ae SN
ee ae ee ee et ee e
Renna ooe ene Bese F INN ;
Gre | Nie
ee er) j SE N
aS Ronco a ae : oXs
‘Four culture, scrutinising the national gid, bolo tes (remember them?) Stone ores 9
Pea eas eee ree ier mseSnvrD int Ean Neer
Se i pt H ESSAYS by REYNER BANHAM
i H
CT en en eee et ears 3 a)
i Een Cas >
Sareea eke one \z i Mary Banham, Paul Barker, Pa
coerce: | Il i
Pesaran erence meer Ten mnt Ss EE *
Oe a eet ee eee al hi
ee eel reer eens al ‘
Loaner et nen nel cemaem eee aan H eI
Pai epercee erences open aeannnednnen ee | m
ee eee eee i k 3
Sc See ees a 1
oa i
Las : |
a i
peepee | /
Tame asa 3
I | 1A i
| PL the ee g kh
Cee ae
9 "780520"219441 CSCC Lieay i }
‘A Critic Writes
ESSAYS by REYNER BANHAM
seecreo ey MaryBanham
Paul Barker
Suthertand Lyall
Cedric Price
Foreword by Petor Hal
eyo Banham tn 19805, Pot by Bud cab
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS
Beraly Los Angeles LondonContents
Thisteoks a priat-on demand volume It anofaured using toe in place
rink Type and images maybe les sry has he same material seen in radtonally
ined Unvesty of California Pres ditions
Published with the assistance of
gran fom the Gra
for kavanced Stes nthe
Foreword by Petar Hall xi
Fears ing 3009 The 19505 1 Vetoes Dette. 3
arf ges net rteon Dn 2. TeNewBratm 7
3. Omen and chime: The Des Contrbton ot AH Loos. 16
al 5. Machine M 6
Sncatney_son eran 2. Mena it 8. Printescfe MechanzecAn 39
mone ae The 19605 47 9, 1960-Stctaling 49
11, Design byCrolce 67
” ee 23, Gig Doug, Small Plece 82
eer sin is pubic mee te ima 24, QlaNumberone 84
pred ne enon 25, Kentand capaoity 7‘The 19705 148
‘The 19805 235
4
45,
48
The Dymarcrat 91
‘Te Siyleforthe Joo 96
sow Leamt to Lie wth the Norwich Union 100
People's Palaces 105
The Great Gizmo 109,
Aviary, London ZologicalGarens, 119
Unibet Any Speed 122
Rsdscape wih RustingNalls 124
History Faculty, Cambrige 128,
“Te Widerness Years of Frank Lyd Weight 137
PonerofTrent andre 351
‘Te Grispatthe Crossroads 157
‘he historn onthe Per 161
‘The MasterBullers 168,
Rank Values 175
Power Pink 184
Iron Bridge Embaimed 188
Bicolgues ala Lanteme 198
Valey ofthe Dame 208,
Grass above, Glass Around 208
‘summa Galactica 212
Pevsner Progress 216
Tokingiwih You 223,
Hotel Dejequoi? 227
Valentino: Simply Fed Away 231
The Haunted Highway 237
Dead onthe Faut 242
O,Bright Star... 248
String Escapes tre Hoots 254
Modem Monuments 262
Bulinginside Ost 265,
Inthe Neighvomeod o Art 27
onthe Wings of Wonder 276
lack Box
biography 304
tal Monuments 264
of rcitecture3)
A Black Box
The Secret Profession of Architecture
‘oor was an architect an Wren was net. This judgment may seem foolhardy, buts
not deiveratety perverse. Ihas been forced on ma by soma mnths of Wlting the
Uoj's bung chant which gave me a chance to revit St Paul's and sundry Cy
churches hac not seen since stasert days, And It struck me that even whan Wren
was being as clever as he was in widening the central bain each arcade st St Manse
fon, oF as Inventive ashe wasn the upper pars of St Stephen Walbrook, he still was
not doing whateveritwas that Hankemoor had done te make gest echiteture out of
ashumerum a concept as the interior of St Mary Wooinoth,
The distinction |am making i not between cferent temperaments orlevels of oe
ative genius, but between fundamental mages of designing, Nor are the consequences
othe srettectural mode necessariy beaut, Some prety vey tut happens inthe
lantem of the mausoleum of the Dulwich At Galley for Instance, yet the reaut eaves
usin no doubt that Sie Jobo Soane was an absolute architec.
\Watever this mode, attitude or presence may be, ene can recognise t—in the bot
{om of Pil Johnson's AT&T busing, for example, but
in most oer works of programmatic postmen. Its absence tam Chaies
wn house lo London inspite ofa ts eucion about architecture, seems to
conf what the recent work of Robert Sto but na, think, of Robert Vent) has
been strony suegesting. That ance on erudtion alone leaves postmoderism a
‘the same relation to architecture as fale impersonation to femininity. isnot ach
tecture, but bung in rag.
| propose to teat the shen
rai mode ot
recognised ts ouput though unknown in ts contents isnot abe mistaken or
‘ood design’, since architectures often conspicuously present—in the wok ot
ve -—Inbuldings that are prety cub designs trom other points of
View. T seperate architecture fom good design inthis way may unsettle thaze wn do
not question the mynologies by which architecture has operated for some si cent:
es now, but doesnot imply tet the wo ae incompatible: smal tht.
ether without the ote
The situation has been much muddleaty the tendency ofthe modern movernen
of Willam Moris, to gatver up all cont bugs ino the rubcc of
‘architecture, This was @ warm endly an egatar'an thing to do, but it must now
‘00m as historically crude and as pemiciouly confusing as Nikolaus Pevsner’sprozo-
sition thet Linco Cathedral's architecture and acyl shed isnot. The astinton
was made on te basis tat Lincoln Cathedral ha aesthetic pretensions and bike
shes dont,
This was not only apiece o academic snobbery that can only offend commas
{70st ke myse but also involves a supposition about sheds that sso sweeping 38
‘tobe almost ast, How can he know that any particular bicycle shed, or even the
whole typology of “bcyte shed In genecal, wes conceive without aesthetic inten
‘om’? wnat one csn know by practised observation, however end whet Pevsner may
‘even have meant), is that cathedrals including uy ones) ae general aesigned
‘med areitctorum, and biyee sheds (even handsome ones) are more commonly
one in one of the numerous other modes of designing buicngsavalable
‘Such the cutural prestige of the purely architectural made, however, within the
Dvotected ares of “west civilisation”, that most of us get brainwashed into beleving
thotitis synonymous with "good design’ ox even “the design of bulldings”. The moo
em movement hes done itstitle good In promoting this muddle, because i thereby
Lndermines one ofits own most useful polemical devices, Fo, in spe of his ins
'steporoach, there as been a long traction —from before Ado Loos to after Cadre
Price—of using comparisons wih certfably non architectural objects, tom peasant
‘rafts to aavenced electronics, to reves how ad regular architectural designing nad
become. Quite alot of tse paragons ware indeed bullae, and good ones a he,
boutonce they, in theirtur, had become incorporated into the areca canon, they
lost heir crest poner anette boy of erhtecture confused rather than reform,Let us then revere what should never have
ines togetneria tis oppor:
istic mariagecotconvenlence Throw out athe Zulu Wreals,grain-elevators, hogar
lunar excursion modules, erucknouses, Farman biplanes and so forth, nd look again
at "this thing clied architecture" ints own right, a one of & numberof thinkable
‘modes of design which, for some reason, has come to acuny & positon of cultura
pilege in eaion to the constuction industry
What ten would cstinguish the praduts ofthis black bx from tose of other
‘inkable modes? Functional or evirenmentalpartnmance? Beauty of form of deft
ness of space? Truth to materials or srvtual aflency? These areal qualities fo:
niente arehitectal profession habitual congratulates tse, but a Buckminste-
Fuller dome or an Eskimo igloo can usually beat architecture on ll si counts, and so
an alot of other bulcngs, sips lines, nfitabies an animal rs, So why do we
not adit that what cstingushos architecture is nat hats cone—since, on their
od days, lhe word ani wife can spparenty it better—but how tis done.
We can cstngush that how” in two crucial ways nthe actual behaviour of ac
tects as they pefonn their alltod tasks as bulding Selene. The fstis that arc
most uniquely among modem deslan potessionala—proposeto assume re
sponsibityfor lof hose sik aspects of good bulding set out above, end tobe legaly
ansmerabe to the cent for rer proper delivery. Oter professions (euch as electra
and mechanical engineering notoiousy avid such overall responsibilities, prefer
‘remain at one remove rom the wrath of cents a “consutentss hired guns whe,
Ike minor wa erminas, “were ony canyng out orders Or, to be less offensive to
‘erences, a body of men who ae to pre to say, forinstance, "You design your cor
"That's @ stupid shape fora concert al tis will werk a lat beter.
However, nis wiligness to assume responsibilty sony what makes architec
noble profession. trot what makes them architec, as Lethaty seems to have pet
ceived in his arguments agsinstprofessionalsstion atthe begining ofthe century.
What makes them architec, and recognisable as such, is usualy easiest to demon
strate anecdotally, begnning wit that of repeated story of the achtectwho, when
‘asked fora pene that could be used to tienen the tourniquet on the limb of per
‘son leesing to Geath in the stet, cael enquired "Wil 28
The point of such stores is that ey unconsciously veal not ony the fundamental
value-ystem on which architects operete, but the narrwmoss of thet system, and the
Lnspoken-—ar unspeakable-—assumpons on whieh rests, The more revealing of
‘thes stories tend to oignate trom that rela attuceformingsuaton, the desion
ceitin the architectural sohool sudo
Inateling example rom my own experience, | ones found myst defending sire
by point a student design fora penthouse apartment that he been flied by my acs