ny \ TH & KAMATH 61 FOURTH MAN ROAD ‘TENT & TRADE MARK ATTORNEYS GANDHI NAGAR, ADYAR Vv wo " \" MADRAS - 600 020 TELEPHONES : 412008, 12277 TELEGRAMS : “TRADOANEY' MADRAS - 600 020, our Refs logracertearbo QUE. OF OE IN REPLY PLEASE QUOTE ist October 1997 The Controller of Patents Madras Sir: A PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE OF ABRASIVE GRAINS FOR PROVIDING @ UNIFORM, HARD, SURFACE THEREON. We file herewith *A generat power of attorney Cégy) *Form 1A in triplicate The complete specification in triplicate *The fee of Rs.300/- payable herein which is included in the accompanying cheque. Yours. faithfully Ke KAMATH = encls“vipya’ WQAMATH & KAMATH Anos! waGAR, ADYAR ‘ADVOCATES CHENNAI 600 020 PATENT & TRADE MARK ATTORNEYS TELEPHONES : 4412008 a 4432675, 4412729 TELEFAX 4412008 IN REPLY PLEASE QUOTE : TELEGRAMS: “TRADORNEYS" ‘CHENNAI - 600 020. gi v Pats a \ 14th March 2062 vk The Controller of Patents Chennai Sint Sub: Patent Application No.2/7/ wnfOz Refs Preliminary Scrutiny Report The requirements with regard to the documents sent to us have been complied with and the documents ticked below are enclosed: *Ppplication a “Complete Specification t~ *Drawings *Power of attorney *Abstract in triplicate va Yours faithfully KAMATH & KAMATHPatent & Trade Mark Attorneys Gandhinagar ? | Chounai 600 020 ‘Telephones 24412008 No 24412277 go 24412675 “4 oe 24412729 \ Telefax 24412008 Aa" Teer nna 600029 anal “ In Reply Please Quote Our Ref:Pat:887 148.04 ‘The Controller of Patents (Chennai sir Patent Application No.2171 MAS 97 314RQ2004 Your letter Ref 3330 dated the 25° June 2004 Ttom 1 of your letter ‘The teachings of US Patent Specification No. 4007020 ere different from the subject of the prevent application. Inthe apace te poset spleation retin to abrasive gain which limaaly ee used in the manufacture of abrasive ‘such aa abrasive wheels. On the other hand tho olted document relates to abrasive bodios themselves, ‘Secondly the cited document relates to a refractory substances also unlike the present ‘invention, Although the cited document refers to 2 wide range of substances, they do not anticipate ‘the present invention, ‘In short, the process parameters in the two cases are different. Kindly waive the objection herein.Item 2 of your letter Claim 5 is doleted. Item 3 of your letter ‘The statement of invention is present at bottom of page 2 and thereafter. Item 4 of your letter ‘The Applicants state that 3547664 id difforent. ‘The product is a refractory for use in furnaces, while the present invention relates to abrasive grains for making abrasive bodies such as grinding wheels. ‘The teachings of the cited document are also different . For instance ceramic fibres mentioned in the cited document do not find a place in the prevent invention. ‘The targets are different. The nature of the respective articlee are different. Kindly waive the requirement herein. Item of your letter ‘The applicants are not aware of the Indian equivalent of the US Specification Item 7 of your letter Done Items 8 and 9 of your letter ‘The applicants have not made any application abroad for the same/substantially the same ‘invention. Itews 10 of your letter Done Enolonure: Application cs ‘Yours faithfully KAMATH & KAMATH. Ze»KAMATH & KAMATH ADVOCATES “vigya” 22998 PATENT & TRADE MARK ATTORNEYS on eeurtl Maia) Heed a ein Gandhi Nagar, Adyar ; SY Chennat - 600'020 ‘Telephones : 24412008 24412277 24412675 Bist December 2004 Carbo.2.ws4 : 24412729 Telefax 324412008 The Controller of Patents Telegrams —:Tradorneys” ¢) Chennai Chennai - 600 020 YD Sint tr letter 17522 dated 26.12.04 Items 1 and 2 af your letter DONE Ene