Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Julius Caesar
Act &
Scene
Character
For Caesar
Act 1,
Scene 1
Cobbler
Act 1,
Scene 2
Against Caesar
Motivation
They respect and favor
Caesar since he brought
victory and triumph to
Rome.
Marullus
Flavius
He dislikes Caesar.
Shows favor and loyalty
towards Pompey.
Calphurnia
Here, my lord."
Wife of Caesar
Antony
Manipulative
Tried to get Brutus onto
his side
Jealous of Caesar
Doesn't like whoever is
better than him
be criticized as hard.
Jealous of Caesar.
Casca
Cicero
A logical and rational
Greek speaker
He did not want to be
involved in Cassius and
Casca' conspiracy.
Cassius
Indeed, it is a strange-disposd
time.
But men may construe things
after their fashion,
Clean from the purpose of the
things themselves.
Comes Caesar to the Capitol
tomorrow?
I know where I will wear this
dagger then; Cassius from
bondage will deliver Cassius".
And why should Caesar be a
tyrant then? || Poor man, I know
he would not be a wolf || But that
he sees the Romans are but
sheep;
What trash is Rome,
What rubbish and what offal,
when it serves
For the base matter to illuminate
So vile a thing as Caesar!
Act 2,
Scene I
Brutus
Brutus thought it was
aimed for a common
good, but actually it was
just to release Cassius's
anger and envy.
Calphurnia
Decius
Alas, my lord,
Your wisdom is consumed in
confidence.
Do not go forth today. Call it
my fear
That keeps you in the house,
and not your own.
Well send Mark Antony to the
senate house,
And he shall say you are not
well today.
(kneels) Let me, upon my
knee, prevail in this.
Trebonius
Act 2,
Scene 3
Artemidorus
Popillius
Cinna
Brutus
Antony
piece of earth,
That I am meek and gentle
with these butchers!
Thou art the ruins of the
noblest man
That ever livd in the tide of
times.
Act 3,
Scene 2
Octavius's Servant
Brutus
First Plebeian
Antony
ALL
Act
Character
For Caesar
Act 4,
Scene 1
Antony
Loyalty/Trust/Alliances
- Not much loyalty towards
Lepidus.
- Just using Lepidus for his
own good and after that, it's
done.
This is a slight,
unmeritable man,
Meet to be sent on errands.
Is it fit,
The threefold world divided,
he should stand
One of the three to share
it?
And though we lay these
honors on this man
To ease ourselves of divers
slanderous loads,
Octavius
Act 4,
Scene 2
Lucilius
Act 4,
Scene 3
Brutus
- Greedy
Act
Character
For Caesar
Act 5,
Scene 1
Octavius
Brutus
Antony
Against Caesar
hounds,
And bowed like bondmen,
kissing Caesars feet,
Whilst damnd Casca, like a
cur, behind
Struck Caesar on the neck. O
you flatterers!
Cassius
Act 5,
Scene 3
Cassius
rest assured
Whether yond troops are
friend or enemy.
- Sad because his friend
died
Come down, behold no
more.
Oh, coward that I am, to
live so long
To see my best friend ta'en
before my face!
- No faith in his armies
Mistrust of good success
hath done this deed.
O hateful error,
melancholys child,
Titinius
Brutus
Lucilius
Act 5,
Scene 5
Brutus
Antony
- Complimented Brutus
Act 2:
5./ Two characters that experienced internal conflicts were Brutus and Caesar throughout scene II. Brutus faced his internal conflict
while hesitating between the common good" and his friend - Caesar. He had to decide whether or not he's going to kill his friend.
The internal conflict of him debating with his logic and sentiment leads him to choosing logic, which is to overthrow the current
general in order for a betterment of the entire society. He noted his confusion in "That every like is not the same, O Caesar, // The
heart of Brutus earns to think upon.."
The second character is Caesar. He was overwhelmed and blinded by the possession of power - being the king. Moreover, his pride
and ego has driven him to make the decision of going which eventually marked the end of his career. He expected himself to do so
much things that he did not necessarily have to do, like going to the ceremony. His internal conflict focused on his ego and pride
versus his logic and good judgment. He could have avoided the Ides of March (his death) by basically trusting his own instinct and
logic.
Act 3:
Personally, when comparing Brutus to Caesar, I think that Brutus displays more noble values and he is more of a tragic hero than
Caesar. He holds high ideals like respecting the community, honouring a republic - Rome, and keeping promises to his family Portia. He believes that Rome deserves a better general, in which nobody is slave, nobody is being ordered around by Caesar and
have to obey such rules that a human should be able to acquire. He was firm about his goal, to kill Caesar, in a betterment of the
society. Even though Caesar was nice to Brutus and Brutus loves Caesar, he values Rome more. His goal is the common good and
for those reasons, Brutus displays higher ideals of a government, of a great general, of a republic.
In my opinion, Brutus personalities and characteristics assert that he is more of a tragic hero. He has a lot to lose, like his voice and
reputation. Caesar, on the other hand, already died and had nothing to lose anymore. During the way, a tragic heroes make poor
mistake that leads to an unfortunate end, here we can see that he made the wrong choice to believe in the lies of the conspirators
when clearly he has good judgments and other people to advise him like his wife. Overall, Brutus holds higher values thus, displays
more of a tragic hero.
Act 4:
8./ Compare and contrast the meeting of the triumvirate in Scene 1 with the meeting of the conspirators in Scene 3. How are the
scenes parallel? How do they differ?
In scene 1, the triumvirates were Antony, Octavius, and Lepidus. In scene 3, the conspirators were Cassius, and Brutus.
These scenes are parallel to each other since it both addresses two sides including various characters, however, from different
perspectives. They are similar because they both project the plans of the triumvirates and conspirators; each talks about how the
plan should go on & how to direct the army. Scene 1 and scene 2 also point out the conflicts between characters like scene 1 which
talks about the triumvirates excluding Lepidus from the plan, and scene 3 talks about the conflict between the two conspirators,
Cassius and Brutus. Money played a role in these scenes too, at first, Antony talked about changing the will of Caesar for his own
betterment, on the other hand, Brutus asked money from Cassius which led to a conflict between those two. There was also a
change in loyalty and alliances.
In contrast, scene 1 and scene 3 are different since the first scene asserts different story, from the point of view of the triumvirates,
and the third scene asserts the conspirators side story. The plans and tactic from both sides are also different from each other. The
triumvirates plan is to exclude Lepidus and change the will of Caesar, and the conspirators plan is to direct the army before the
triumvirates army comes near to Phillipi. Scene 3 is separated from scene 1 by the characters relationship; in scene 1, the
triumvirates agreed on a plan, to kill, and in scene 3, the characters conflicted each other due to Cassius actions. From different
standpoints, scene 1 had an agreement and the solution was offered, while scene 3, the conflict was resolved but there was internal
grudges towards each other.
Act 5:
6/ What events take place that finally restore order to Roman society? How do these events help define the play as a tragedy?
- Throughout scene 5, the events that finally restore order to Roman society were the bad decisions made by characters like Cassius
& Brutus. They decided to kill themselves without the right consultant and sight of the situation. For Cassius, he did not observe the
entire scene to get an explicit insight of the story, which resulted his legions a loss of a great general. They made the wrong decisions
by encountering their lives upon the battle, which is impossible to know who will win or lose, however, the conspirators chose to
believe the omens. Before the battle finished, the two generals already surrendered by believing in the misconceptions.
- These events defined a tragedy because first of all, it includes a tragic hero. Moreover, the impossibilities to make good decisions
were also factors that make Julius Caesar a tragedy. Overall, in the end, it comes back to the the start, Julius Caesar now is Octavius
Caesar and after everything that the characters encountered throughout this play was a waste of efforts.
11/ In the resolution, the last scene, why is it significant that Octavius delivers the plays final speech?
- In the resolution, the last scene, it is significant that Octavius delivers the plays final speech because it marks the end of the old
Julius Caesar and initiates the new beginning of the new king Octavius Caesar. Octavius now is in charge of Romes well-being
and takes over control. It represents and illustrates the whole cycle once again, Julius wanting to be the king and now Octavius
wanting to be the king. Ending the scene with Octavius' speech also hints and triggers the readers' minds that the upcoming rule is
going to be similar to Julius Caesar. It defines a tragedy since everything came back to the beginning, and all the deaths and
sacrifices that were made are for the same old government.
What defines a tragedy?
- Bad decisions
- Impossibilities to make good decisions.
- Death is sometimes involve
- Punishment like loss
- End up with the same situation
Conspirators plan
+ Assassination
Conflicts getting worse, escalating
Act 3 Climax:
Caesar is killed
Act 5 Resolution: