Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PERMEABILITY SANDSTONES
TAD M. SMITH
Tight gas sand reservoirs currently account for approximately 19% of total U.S.
gas production (Oil and Gas Investor, 2005)
Estimated reserves in all unconventional reservoirs is approximately 200 Tcf
tight gas sand reservoirs may contain up to 35% of the U.S. recoverable gas resources
some facts on tight gas sands in the Rockies:
Upwards of 41.7 Tcf
Montana and the Dakotas could contribute another 100 Tcf
Within the Green River and Wind River basins, more than 1,000 Tcf of gas is thought to occur in
tight gas sands at depths greater than 15,000 feet
Rock physics lags behind other aspects of tight gas sand reservoirs
THIS PROJECT
= PRODUCED GAS
1 MILE
DEPTH
M
GR
GAPI
150
0.2
M2R9
OHMM
2000
0.2
M2R3
OHMM
2000
0.2
M2R1
OHMM
2000
( SP )
-160
200
40
C24
MM
400
10000
VP_FINAL
ft/s
2800
A common
observation
2810
2820
2830
2840
2850
20000
22000
20000
16000
14000
12000
10000
DEVON
3-19-61-9
NOTE POOR CORRELATION BETWEEN POROSITY AND VELOCITY
(R2LYNX
= 0.44)
VP (ft/s)
18000
OUTLIER WELLS
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
POROSITY
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
VELOCITY (ft/s)
16000
15000
14000
13000
12000
11000
10000
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
POROSITY (%)
3.5
4.5
KEY POINTS:
WHAT ELSE?
FRACTURES
DEPTH
M
2790
2800
2810
2820
2830
2840
2850
2860
2870
2880
GR
GAPI
100
LCAL
MM
100
HCAL
MM
150
300
300
0.2
RDEEP
ohmm
2000
0.2
RMED
ohmm
2000
0.2
AHT20
OHMM
2000
PRESSURE SOLUTION
CONTACT/SCAR
ORGANIC MATTER/
DEAD OIL
ORGANIC/CLAY
LAMINAE
100UM
0.1
22000
20000
16000
14000
K-T, = 0.004
12000
VP (ft/s)
18000
K-T, = 0.05
8000
10000
0.015
0.03
0.045
0.06
POROSITY
TOTAL POROSITY
0.075
0.09
0.105
0.12
20000
22000
GAS-FILLED SPHERES
BRINE-FILLED CRACKS
= 0.001
16000
cc = 0.1%
14000
cc = 0.25%
12000
cc = 0.5%
10000
8000
VP (ft/s)
18000
cc = 0
0.015
0.03
0.045
0.06
0.075
0.09
0.105
0.12
POROSITY
SPHERICAL
POROSITY
cc = crack concentration
CORE VELOCITIES
18000
16000
15000
18000
13000
SAMPLE 1
SAMPLE 3
SAMPLE 6
SAMPLE 9
SAMPLE 11.1
17000
VELOCITY (ft/s)
16000
12000
15000
SAMPLE 11.2
SAMPLE 12
SAMPLE 14.1
14000
13000
12000
KEY OBSERVATIONS:
11000
1)
LARGE RANGE IN VELOCITIES AT HIGH NES
2)
LARGE CHANGE IN VELOCITIES WITH INCREASING NES
11000
10000
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
POROSITY (%)
10000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
3.5
4.5
SLOT PORES
PAY SAND
DEPTH
FT
PERF
10 B/E
PERF
8150
VSHALE
v/v
0.2
VSHALE
RILD
ohm.m
200
EDIT_VP
KM/S
EDIT_VS
KM/S
3.5
PREDICTED VP
PREDICTED VS
ASSUMPTIONS:
Quartz matrix
Gas saturated spheres (log-porosity)
Brine-filled cracks (slot pores)
Crack aspect ratio = 0.01
8200
AVG. POROSITY 9%
Sphere concentration = 6%
Crack concentration = 2.5%
VP = 4.583 km/s
VS = 2.744 km/s
8250
OBSERVATIONS/CONCLUSIONS
Implications
OBSERVATIONS/CONCLUSIONS
CARE MUST BE TAKEN WHEN USING ANY SEISMIC
DATA TO MAP POROSITY
In low porosity rocks, the effects of pore geometry are probably more
important than the total porosity
Amplitude anomalies in low porosity reservoirs may be may be
indicators of lithology, and not reservoir quality
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ConocoPhillips
VeritasDGC (CGGVeritas)
Carl Sondergeld
Chandra Rai
QUESTIONS?
(1
K sat
K fr
)2
K0
= K fr +
(1 ) K fr
+
2
K fl
K0
K0