VEDAS VS KRISHNA:Missionaries Often argue to prove Jesus is

God as follow:1] Either Jesus is God or a liar.

2] Either Jesus is what He claimed to be
or a liar.
If you donot have the courage to say
Jesus is a liar then you have to accept
Jesus is God.
How ever thses are crude in form. A
similar form of argument can be asked for
Krishna but in refined form.
EITHER KRISHNA IS WHAT HE CLAIMED TO
BE OR KRISHNA IS NOT WHAT HE
CLAIMED TO BE.
IF KRISHNA IS NOT WHAT HE CLAIMED TO
BE THEN THE CRADIBILITY OF GITA IN
PARTICULAR AND MAHA BHARTA IN

GENERAL IS LOST AND THEY BECOME

FABRICATIONS.
IF KRISHNA IS WHAT HE SAID TO BE THEN
A PROOF IS REQUIRED FOR THE TRUTH
OF THE CLAIM KRISHNA IS WHAT HE
CLAIMED TO BE. BUT THIS CLAIM
CANNOT BE PROVED FROM GITA BUT
PROOF TEXS MUST BE CITED FROM 4
VEDAS AND 10 UPNISHUDS. IF THIS CLAIM
IS UNPROVABLE THEN KRISHNA CANNOT
BE GOD JUST BECAUSE HE CLAIMED TO
BE GOD.
IF IT IS ARGUED THAT VEDAS AND 10 UPNISHUDS PREDATRES
KRISHNA AND GITA ETC. AND THEY CANNOT BE PROVED FROM
VEDAS AND 10 UPNISHUDS . THEN IT IS JUST A CONFESSION THAT
KRISHNA AND GITA ARE UNPROVABLE. IF UN PROVABLE THEN THEY
CANNOT BE BELIEVED IN. BUT THE REQUIREMENT IS OF
PROPHECIES. THERE MUST BE SOME PROPHECIES LIKE THERE
WOULD BE A PERSON BORN , NAMED KRISHNA SON OF SO AND SO
ETC. FROM VEDAS AND 10 UPNISHUDS. IF THERE ARE NO SUCH
PROPHECIES IN VEDAS AND IN 10 UPNISHUDS, THEN THE CLAIM
KRISHNA IS WHAT SO EVER HE CLAIMED TO BE CANNOT BE TRUE.
SIMILARLY TRUTH OF GITA AND MAHA BHARTA REQUIRS FROOFS
FROM VEDAS AND 10 UPNISHAUDS OTHER WISE THEY ARE NOT
RELIABLE AND IF NOT RELIABLE THEN HERETICAL FABRICATIONS.