7462 Project Five Rubric

Criteria

Yes

Yes but

Missing

Application 1. The submission used Weebly.com as its delivery application.

2. The submission has at least 6 web pages using Weebly.com.

3. An INTRODUCTION page is included containing introductory information about the website and
its author, and at least 3 appropriate images of the author as an individual, professional, & learner.
5. One of the pages, TOOLS, introduce a definition (supported with citations) with at least two with
examples with descriptions for each.
6. One of the pages, APPLICATIONS, introduce a definition (supported with citations) with at least
two examples with descriptions for each.
5. One of the pages, RESOURCES, introduce a definition (supported with citations) with at least
three examples with descriptions for SCIENCE.
5. One of the pages, RESOURCES, introduce a definition (supported with citations) with at least
three examples with descriptions for MATH.
5. One of the pages, RESOURCES, introduce a definition (supported with citations) with at least
three examples with descriptions for READING/WRITING or LANGUAGE ARTS.
5. One of the pages, RESOURCES, introduce a definition (supported with citations) with at least
three examples with descriptions for SOCIAL STUDIES.
5. One of the pages, RESOURCES, introduce a definition (supported with citations) with at least
three examples with descriptions for ARTS.
5. One of the pages, TUTORIALS, introduce a definition (supported with citations) with at least one
example of video tutorial, a working link, title, image/screenshot, and annotation.
7. The quality of the PRESENTATION of ideas is clear.

8. Images are used in each page that originated from the application library or pictures owned by
the creator.
9. The quality of writing is excellent with good use of the language, and minimal issues pertaining to
mechanics.
10. The submission includes a URL of the website posted in the designated discussion board.

11. The submission includes screenshots of all the pages and subpages posted in the designated
drop box.
Reflection 1. A REFLECTION page is included that begins with a paragraph on the importance of
reflective practice given this project experience.
2. A reflection page is uploaded in the designated drop box by the deadline.

3. This reflection pages CONTENT contains substantive introduction about the project.

4. This reflection pages CONTENT contains substantive information about the diverse target
audiences of the multiple projects you created.

5. This reflection pages CONTENT contains substantive information about challenges in creating
the content of each of the projects.

6. This reflection pages CONTENT contains substantive information about challenges of developing
a skill set for each of the projects.

7. This reflection pages CONTENT contains substantive description of instructional activities that
each of the projects can support.

8. The quality of the PRESENTATION of ideas is clear, supports the submission, and demonstrates
alignment with the expectations.

9. The quality of writing is excellent with good use of the language, minimal issues pertaining to
mechanics, and well-supported with accurate citations.

10. File naming protocols are followed.

11. A REFERENCE page is included with accurate APA formatting.

TOTAL

80

NOTE: 20 points for this project is allotted for global assessment of the submission that bring the total points to a 100.
Missing

Brief Description
Global
Criteria

Accuracy
and
Relevance
Content

The CONTENT included in this

submission is accurate and relevant
given the learning goals and
objectives of the project.

Presentation
of Ideas

The quality of the PRESENTATION

of ideas is clear, supports each
section, and aligned with the learning
expectations for this project.

Applications
to Practice
or Context

This submission demonstrated

appropriate CONNECTIONS by
learners to their professional
development needs, context or
practice.

Quality of
Writing

The quality of WRITING is excellent

with good use of the language,
minimal issues pertaining to
mechanics, and well-supported with
accurate citations.

TOTAL
POINTS

There are
missing
sections and
overall
submission
needs
improvement

All Sections
are present
but needs
rework in all
sections

All sections are

present but
needs rework
in some
sections

Acceptable
but can be
improved

Good
evidence of
scholarly
work by a
graduate
student

20