University of the East

RAMON MAGSAYSAY MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC.

PEDIATRICS II Preceptorials
School Year 2015 2016
STUDENTS EVALUATION SHEET

Name of Student: ______________________________

Preceptor: ___________________

Date of Rotation: ______________________________

Final Grade:

___________________

RUBRIC FOR PRECEPTORIAL CLASSES

SCORE

MEETING (until the 10th

meeting)

CRITERIA
4
Attendance

Level Of
Engagement In
Case Discussion
(Participation and
Depth of
Discussion)

Student discusses an
adequate, comprehensive,
logical integration of
history, physical
examination and medical
knowledge; Sensible
assessment; Evidencebased and cost-effective

Student is punctual and

present for preceptorial
class

Student is late but less

than 40 minutes for
preceptorial class

Student is late for more

than 40 minutes for
preceptorial class

Student discusses with

minor deficiencies in
case discussion, logical
integration of
information, differential
diagnoses and/or
diagnostic approach and

Student rarely discusses

logical integration of
information, differential
diagnoses and/or
diagnostic approach and
management; just reading
the report

Student generally
discusses illogical and
disorganized; poor
analysis and integration
of information; does not
discuss in relation to the
patient presented; just

1ST

2ND

3RD

4TH

5TH

approach and
management

management

Listening Skills

Student listens when

others talk and
incorporates or builds off
of the ideas of others.

Student listens when

others talk.

Student does not listen

when others talk.

Student does not listen

when others talk and
often interrupts when
others speak.

Verbal
Communication
Skills

Student is very fluent

English speaks in a clear,
concise, well-organized
manner

Student shows good

command of the English
language -- better than
average ability to get his
ideas across.

Average fluency speaks

in a reasonably organized
manner; sometimes fails
to get points across well.
(Tagalog-English language)

Student has poor verbal

fluency --generally finds
difficulty in expressing
his/her thoughts.
(Tagalog language)

Behavior

Student ALWAYS shows

respect and
professionalism in dealing
with peers, preceptors
and patients

Student shows respect

and professionalism in
dealing with peers,
preceptors and patients
MOST OF THE TIME

Student shows respect and

professionalism in dealing
with peers, preceptors
and patients
OCCASIONALLY

Student NEVER shows

respect and
professionalism in dealing
with peers, preceptors
and patients

Preparation for
Preceptorial Class

Student is almost always

prepared for preceptorial
case discussions

Student is usually
Student is rarely prepared
prepared for preceptorial for preceptorial case
case discussions
discussions

Student is never
prepared for preceptorial
case discussions

reading the report

OVERALL SCORE FOR PRECEPTORIAL

CLASSES

RUBRIC FOR WRITTEN REPORTS

SCORE

MEETING (until the 10th

meeting)

CRITERIA
4

1ST

2ND

3RD

4TH

5TH

History
(History of Present
illness and
Pediatric History
pertinent to
patients age and
problem)
Note: May not
applicable for paper
cases)

Written patient history is

comprehensive and
accurate

Written patient history is

adequate but shows
some inconsistent data

Physical
Examination
(with
Anthropometrics,
corresponding Zscore and
interpretation and
pertinent to
patients age and
problem)
Note: May not
applicable for paper
cases)

Written clinical
examination is
comprehensive and
accurate

Written clinical
Written clinical
examination is
examination shows
comprehensive but shows numerous inaccurate data
some inaccurate data

Written clinical
examination is
incomplete and
inaccurate

Case analysis is adequate,

comprehensive, logical
integration of history,
physical examination and
medical knowledge;
Sensible assessment;
Evidence-based and costeffective approach

Minor deficiencies in
case analysis, logical
integration of
information, differential
diagnoses and/or
diagnostic approach

Unsatisfactory; generally
illogical and
disorganized; poor
analysis and integration
of information; report
copied verbatim from
textbook (Cut & Paste),
and not discussed in
relation to the patient
presented

Assessment
(Initial Impression,
Differential
Diagnosis and
Diagnostic
Approach)

Written patient history

shows numerous
inconsistent data

Multiple deficiencies in
case analysis, logical
integration of information
inadequacies; report
copied verbatim from
textbook (Cut & Paste),
minimally discussed in
relation to the patient
presented

Written patient history is

incomplete and
inaccurate

Management plans

Comprehensive, logical,
evidence-based and costeffective plans; both
short- and long-term plans
presented (when
applicable); adverse
outcomes resulting from
management and
risk:benefit ratio taken
into consideration

Minor deficiencies in
both short- and longterm plans (when
applicable)

Multiple deficiencies in
both short- and long-term
plans (when applicable);
report remains
satisfactory; report
copied verbatim from
textbook (Cut & Paste)

Unsatisfactory; generally
illogical and
disorganized; Minimally
discussed in relation to
the patient presented;
report copied verbatim
from textbook (Cut &
Paste)

OVERALL SCORE FOR WRITTEN

REPORTS

FINAL SCORE

With my knowledge:
____________________________
Students Signature/Date

___________________________
Preceptors Signature/Date