Attention Patrick W. McDermott Register and May 7, 2003 Assistant Registers, Clare Gamberoni, Lee Peterson Judith Murray and the clerk named Dan of the Probate and Family Court Norfolk Division 35 Shawmut Road Canton, MA 02021 Tel. (781) 830-1271 Fax.: (781) 830-4310 Re: NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF James A. McLaughlin et al v. David R. Amos et al Norfolk Probate and Family Court C.A. NO. 02E 0094 Sir/Madam With reference to the above-entitled action, I am enclosing the following: 1. Defendant's Notice of Filing Papers Removing Action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire along with a copy of the Notice of Removal to the said court with the docket number duly noted thereon. James A. McLaughlin v. Jean F. O'Meara et al Civil Action C.A. NO. O2E 0094 2. My Notices of Appearances on behalf of myself and my wife, Jean F. O'Meara, Under her Durable Power of Attorney that I tried to file on May 2, 2003. 3. Tam also enclosing copies of all documents that are attached to the Notice of Removal to U.S. District Court. One of the said documents is my Affidavit that is filed to support the reasons to file my complaints in the District of New Hampshire. It was originally served on the U. S. Attorney of the said District to support filing a personal injury lawsuit in that District. It should suffice for this matter. Attached to the said document you will find The U. S. Attorney, Michael J. Sullivan's, copy of my complaint Norfolk Superior Court C. A. No. 02-01070. Attached to the same document you will also find the court ordered revised accountings of the trustee William J. Kickham, prepared by the Kickham Law Offices and filed by the lawyer, Richardson. The Court Appointed Trustee, the plaintiff in this matter, did not oppose the accounts after refusing to discuss them with me. In Norfolk Superior Court after he is now demanding that this matter be heard after receiving a Judgment by default against him. I agree that this matter has been delayed too long but that it must be heard in Federal Court with a jury and not by his fellow litigants against us in Norfolk Probate Court.4, Lam attaching to this letter a copy of the letter I left for the Register, McDermott on May 2, 2003. I will be filing the original in Federal Court to prove that I made every effort humanly possible to attain proper copies of all documents within the docket of a public record. It is my right to do so and was denied. On May 2" when I appeared at the Registers Office of Norfolk Probate Court Twas much offended by all of the Clerks employed in that of fice. I know for certain that every person employed in your office is well aware of my efforts to protect my family’s interests within the Court. I have been delayed, denied, stricken and harassed many times by employees of the Norfolk Probate Court in their effort to conceal their wrongs. If any Clerk had cared to notice, I have maintained my manners and ethics at all times. T have complained of five clerks, three judges and one court guard only because of their involvement in the matters. Ido not consider everyone employed in your Office a bad person, some folks T actually admire. On May 2nd you all proved your malice towards my Clan. On December 12, 2002 the clerk named Dan witnessed my filing of my wife's answer to McLaughlin with attached exhibits that were about one foot thick. My witness watched him help Ed Paccioretti determine the proper docket number for the matter (the Court had assigned different numbers to it) It was Dan that directed me to cross out the docket number that I had been given by the court and write in the new number. The conversation with Brunetti and the harassment by Badge Number 859 was witnessed as well. The ramification of the court's malice is the reason I stayed away from your of fice for five months. Apparently the court did not expect an answer to McLaughlin's complaint. Tt was no surprise to me that my wife was served the complaint on the same day that a U.S. District Court Judge signed an order to hear a Motion to Dismiss her matter Ex Parte in that court. It appeared to me that Norfolk Probate was so certain that the U. S. Attorney was about to have our complaints dismissed, that it decided to proceed with the McLaughlin Complaint. However I managed to throw a wrench in the U.S. Attorney's works. Thus the Norfolk Probate Court delayed all proceedings in the McLaughlin matter. The Register refused to accept my mail. The Clerk Brunnetti destroyed the Exhibits attached to the answer of Jean F. O'Meara in this matter.Six months after the first filing of the McLaughlin Complaint in Norfolk Court, I have decided to remove the matter to Federal Court and a jury trial os an interested party and defendant that has never been served. T am acting well within my rights. In order to remove the matter I must obtain proper certified copies of all documents. That is the reason I was in the office on May and, T have many issues to resolve with the Register McDermott and was willing to discuss the matters with him before complaining of him.After the clerk named Dan realized he had involved himself in a matter way over his head, he ordered me to sit down and said that he would send someone to speak with me. His statement that the Court does not docket Oppositions to Motions was absurd. He saw my look and exited stage left before I could embarrass him. Lwaited quite awhile before John Jenney appeared and tried to pull a fast one. He attempted to discuss the matter with me. I quickly informed him that he should know that we could not discuss it because of my litigation against him. I can only talk to his lawyer, the incompetent and fraudulent Mr. Quinan. He informed me ‘that no one else would speak to me. That apparently was a true statement because none of you did and I waited a long time. The fact that everyone deliberately ignored me was witnessed. The only thing funnier than that was when T appeared in the Clerks Office of Plymouth Probate Court recently, everyone employed there left the office and left my witness and I alone in the room. Now that was hilarious. Yesterday the mean expressions on many faces were insulting, Clerks laughed and joked as they greeted and served others, while simply ignoring or looking at us with a leer or a scowl. Anyone would have been of fended by such treatment. With any luck your Office will only have to see me one more time. Tt will be when I witness my wife filing my Affidavit with an amazing amount of attachments in your of fice I dare you to ignore her. She does have a temper. It more than makes up for my lack of one. She is very upset with the Courts at the same time that I am enjoying prosecuting the crooks that they are assisting. ‘As far as I know I am the only interested party to object to the Court Ordered Revised Accountings of William J. Kickham. This time T have a right to be heard that cannot be denied. Judge David H. Kopelman is the only Judge in Norfolk Probate Court that has the right to hear me. I look forward to meeting him. The first question T will ask him is the same that I asked Judge Harms on the record. Now I ask all of you one question in writing. I expect a similar response. Do you understand the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America? Lf so then please review my complaint that is mentioned in paragraph 3 of this letter. Then look at the accountings that are also mentioned in the same. paragraph. Do you understand the Civil Rights Violations as explained within the complaint and in open view in the public record of the said accountings and on file in your office? It's a small wonder why none of you would speak to me on May ane T have every right to sue the Kickhams, the Deutsch crowd and McLaughlin again and seek even more relief because apparently the amount sought in the first complaints was not enough to make them mend their evil ways. We received Judgments by Default against the Court Appointed Trustee and the Kickham Law Offices before, the filing of more crimes in the public record by the lawyer,Richardson. There is no need to explain why my wife has the right to view all records and assent to the accounts before the Register of Norfolk Probate and Family Court allowed the filing of the accounts. Please view the last attachment. On October 16, 2002, the liar, Tammy L. Richardson, agreed to reopen the estate of Elaine G. Kickham in order to address the Tax Fraud that I had reported to the IRS well over one year ago. On May 16, 2002, the Kickham Law Offices withdrew from William J. Kickham's defense after they had snitched on him in confidence to the Overseers. I was not surprised that the Deutsch crowd entered the fray. Their office is about one hundred yards from the Overseers Office. The fact that they picked the unit that defends white collar crimes, tax fraud and civil rights issues to defend William J. Kickham rather than the one that practiced probate legal matters was no shock. The fact that Tammy L. Richardson was conferring with Brian J. Kickham about matters that he held no interest in whatsoever proved to me that the Kickhams knew they were in big trouble and were willing to spend every penny of the trust funds in their defense. William J. Kickham liquidated all assets of the trust at the time of hiring the Deutsch crowd, no doubt upon their advice. The Deutsch crowd tried to settle on behalf of the Kickhams. However we would be guilty of concealing Tax Fraud if we had even considered their offer. We were compelled to sue all parties and this was explained to the plaintiff James A. McLaughlin and to Assistant Register John Jenney. They understood my logic but apparently underestimated my diligence. None of this is news to any of the parties or to all of you. I simply stated it because the United States of America has an interest in these matters as well. The plaintiff should have named it as a defendant when he filed this complaint two days after explaining the IRS issues to Judge Carey. The Norfolk Probate Court does not have jurisdiction over matters involving the IRS. In her decision ofa matter that she, the plaintiff and the lawyer, Richardson claimed did not exist. Judge Carey quotes the exact amount of the Tax Fraud reported. Her reason for not hearing it is ridiculously comical. For the Appeals Clerk to ask for a recording of a hearing that never happened is incompetence tainted with malice. For a Judge to act as her own Appellate Judge is prejudice. To deliberately cover up Tax Fraud warrants a sentence to jail for all conspirators under U.S.C. Title 18. If the United States of America does not step up to the plate and uphold the law T will complain of its malice and incompetence. On March 31, 2003 I served the U.S Attorney in New Hampshire much evidence of many crimes. On April 1, 2003 I declared the facts of my investigations in two Courts of the Commonwealth and served two District Attorneys of the Commonwealth the evidence of many crimes.To date the only response that I have received has been byway of Agents of the Secret Service waking me up in our family home with their investigation of false allegations made against me by Officers of the Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Desperate people do desperate things. I consider it prudent to leave my home in order to protect my kin from possible foul play. Judge Mark Coven of Quincy District refused the requests for restraining orders by my wife and I for no reason whatsoever. He refused to ask my wife any questions in order to ascertain the truth and refute the perjury of her brothers whom we had asked to be restrained. The Judge did not want to hear of the crimes on the record. Tam about to leave the Commonwealth of Massachusetts because of the actions of many authorities within it against me. Shortly I will be filing a personal injury lawsuit in another State. Tf you do not answer this letter T will be sending you a summons to answer. As the Clerk Tobin and the Clerk Cross would explain it to you, it is the American Way. I also wish to make you aware that T understand U.S.C. Title 42 sections 1985 and 1986 and many other Federal Laws as well. U.S.C. Title 18 suggests jail time for Civil Rights of fences as well. have already portrayed you all in my journal ina Canadian Way. I don't think you will like my point of view, but your stated opinions of me are much worse. I strongly suggest that you consider the matter quickly because T will name you people as defendants in my soon to be filed personal injury complaint. I can file that one in any district that I choose. I like to travel and I hear Alaska is nice this time of year. T also like the fact that my native land is situated between Alaska ‘and Massachusetts, but then again, I have always felt at home in Dixie. Also you should consider where home is to a Proud Canadian. I have every right to file complaints in Canada, whether or not the American Justice System fails to uphold the law. I cannot deny the fact that I am having fun, but it does not logically follow that Tam kidding. Many a true word is said in jest. Study my every word, the devil is in the details. I know that you Yankees think me a silly hillbilly, but I did legitimately found my Clan and the Blood Feud I declared is very sincere. T await your response. Please take me seriously. I suspect that you would do no less to defend your family and their interests. Do any of you recall your oath before the bar? It is time to recall the ethics you may have been taught as law students. Perhaps you should appeal to the reasonable nature of a layman whom you summoned a response from in the Brookline Tab. By now you must realize that T have no fear of litigation and will not quit. As the old 17" century dramatist said * ‘A poor man need not fear a crowd of lawyers any more than a crowd of pickpockets.” Upon review, I see that the U.S. Attorney was aware of the crimes in Tanuary of 2002, immediately after my visit with his client Mark Vespucci. sThis correspondence has been lengthy for the sake of brevity. I will be attaching this document to correspondences sent or delivered in hand to a great many of Government Officials in order that they may have an understanding of the matters and act within the scope of their employment. By attaching this document it allows me the luxury of being brief with my correspondence to others. There is a method to my madness, I om absolutely certain that I can prove to a jury of my peers the existence of the conspiracy that the U.S. Attorney, Michael J. Sullivan, makes fun of as he argues Tax Issues Ex Parte within a Civil Rights Complaint. I can hardly wait to meet him and Judge Stearns in Court in front of a Jury. That day will be coming very soon. Judge Stearns of U.S. District Court ignored Canon 3A(4) of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. It provides that a judge should “neither initiate nor consider ex parte or other communications concerning a pending or impending proceeding." The fact that Judge Stearns dismissed complaints seeking relief in the amount of forty eight million dollars upon the certification of a liar is amazing. The Motions to Dismiss were never served on the Plaintiffs and everything was done before the Plaintiff's were allowed to oppose the action within the fourteen-day time limit of the Local Rules. All was done on paper with no hearing whatsoever. The U.S. Attorney had only managed to file @ Notice of Appearance after his clients were almost five months in default. He had failed to do so properly in his two previous attempts in the matters. However Judge Stearn's Clerk removed the documents from the dockets, but not before I had attained certified copies of his incompetence. The U.S. Attorney removed the matters to Federal Court under Laws that do not exist and after his clients were in default. He committed perjury when he stated that his clients were not served and filed fraudulent documents as proof. He removed defendants and plaintiffs. He failed to obey Superior Court Rule 9A. And yes Robert Quinan did commit perjury, ‘Mail Fraud and did fail to file a Notice of Appearance in Federal Court in his incompetent and fraudulent defense of his clients. Please view my attachments. Tam constantly amazed by the attitude of people employed in civil service. Tf you behaved in such a fashion in the private sector you would not meet with much success, Perhaps that is why you work where you do. Obviously politics rather than ethics carries more weight in your employment. That is my most polite insult. Please feel free to sue me if you wish to. I will defend myself Pro Se in the same fashion that I am prosecuting. I have a fool for a client therefore welcome to my Circus® David R. Amos 153 Alvin Ave., Milton, MA. 02186 http://_ briefcase.yahoo.com/motomaniac_02186 6Attention April 30, 2003 John A. Sullivan and John Fitzsimmons Clerks of Plymouth District Court 7 South Russell Street Plymouth, MA 02360 Re: NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF Veronica A. Rooney v. Jean F. O'Meara et al Plymouth District Court Civil Action NO. 0259SC1981 Sirs: With reference to the above-entitled action, I am enclosing the following documents: 1. Defendant's Notice of Filing Papers Removing Action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire along with a copy of the Notice of Removal to the said court with the docket number duly noted thereon. Veronica A. Rooney v. Jean F. O'Meara et al Civil Action C.A. NO. 0259S¢1981 2. A copy of my Notice of Appearance on behalf of my wife, Jean F. O'Meara, under her Durable Power of Attorney. 3. Tam also enclosing copies of all documents that are attached to the Notice of Removal to U.S. District Court. One of the said documents is my Affidavit that was filed to support the reasons to file my complaints in the District of New Hampshire. Attached to the said document you will find The U.S. Attorney Michael J. Sullivan's copy of my complaint Norfolk Superior Court C. A. No. 02-01070. Attached to the same document you will also find the court ordered revised accountings of the trustee William J. Kickham, prepared by the Kickham Law Offices. Tam also demanding a complete and accurate recording of the above- entitled matter. At the time of my first request it was not necessary for me to notify other litigants if the recording was not to be used in that matter. T ORIGINAL FLED to support a personal injury lawsuit. It was not required of me to inform them or you of my intentions. Anyone can buy a AMY FSD lic record. However T plan to use the recording and the transcri LP eCORT this matter as well. Therefore I have notified the osha ZF RAYCU demanded and have included a copy of the letter to Smas support that T have done so. Please forward the recording as soonas possible, I stood and watched your hands shaking, Mr. Sullivan, as you swapped the tapes in front of me. I explained everything to you Mr. Fitzsimmons at your request and then you ignore me. Now I ask the both of you two questions in writing. I expect a similar response. Do you believe that is my wife's signature or a forgery? The evidence is enclosed. And do you understand the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America? If so the please review my complaint that is mentioned in paragraph 3 of this letter. Then look at the accountings that are also mentioned in the same paragraph. Do you understand the Civil Rights Violations as explained within the complaint and in open view in the public record of the said accountings? I have every right to sue the Kickhams again and seek even more relief because apparently the amount sought in the first complaints was not enough to make them mend their evil ways. We were entitled Judgments by Default seven months before their filing of more crimes in the public record. T await your response. Please take me seriously. I suspect that you would do no less to defend your family and their interests. Do you recall your oath before the bar. It is time to recall the ethics you were taught as law students. Perhaps you should appeal to the reasonable nature of a layman whom you summoned a response from. By now you must realize that T have no fear of litigation and will not quit. I strongly suggest that you consider the matter quickly because I will name you men as defendants in my soon to be filed personal injury complaint. I can file that one in any district that I choose. I like to travel and I hear Alaska is nice this time of year. I also like the fact that my native land is situated between Alaska and Massachusetts, but then again, I have always felt at home in Dixie. Also you should consider where home is to a Proud Canadian. I have every right to file complaints in Canada, whether or not the American Justice System fails to uphold the law. I cannot deny the fact that I am having fun, but it does not logically follow that Iam kidding. Many a true word is said in jest. Study my every word, the devil is in the details. > Ault 7Bavid R. Amos 153 Alvin Ave, Milton, MA. 02186 (617) 249-6698Robert E. McCarthy, Register of April 25, 2003 Plymouth Probate and Family Court P.O. Box 3640 Plymouth, MA 02361 Re: NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF Robert F. O'Meara et al v. Jean F. O'Meara et al Plymouth Probate and Family Court Civil Action No. O2E0083PP1 Sir: With reference to the above-entitled action, I am enclosing the following documents: 1. Defendant's Notice of Filing Papers Removing Action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire along with a copy of the certified copy of the Notice of Removal to the said court with the docket number duly noted thereon. Robert F. O'Meara et al v. Jean F. O'Meara et al Civil Action No. O2E0083PP!, and 2. A copy of my Notice of Appearance on behalf of my wife, Jean F. O'Meara, under her Durable Power of Attorney. I understand that Judge Livingstone of Plymouth Probate Court, whom you recently welcomed aboard on February 10, 2003, has attempted to strike that appearance. However as Thad stated in several documents filed in this court before standing before him, I am an interested party and a defendant and that I did not recognize the jurisdiction of the Plymouth Probate Court over the matter nor did I recognize that the matter was proceeding according to law. I appeared only $0 as to not to be found in contempt of court and with the sincere wish that the Court would prosecute the criminals that had filed this complaint and to file in another Court of the Commonwealth the evidence of many crimes practiced against my Clan. The Notice of Appearance that was filed in the Plymouth Probate Court on January 2, 2003 was accepted by you as Clerk as a legal document allowing me to defend my wife as her Pro Se. That right to Pro Se defense should extend into federal court upon removal. On January 3, 2003 you apparently docketed the complaint, however we were never served a copy. The copy your office gave me on January 2, 2003 was not docketed and bears no stamp duly noting otherwise. The Plaintiffs and the Court did not object to the Rights within the Durable Power of Attorney until my wife and I exposed the crimes with a Motion to Dismiss.3. Lam also enclosing copies of all documents that are attached to the Notice of Removal to U.S. District Court. One of the said documents is my Affidavit that was filed to support the reasons to file my complaints in the District of New Hampshire. Attached to the said document you will find The U. S. Attorney Michael J, Sullivan's copy of my complaint Norfolk Superior Court C. A. No, 02-01070, Attached to the same document you will also find the court ordered revised accountings of the trustee William J. Kickham, prepared by the Kickham Law Offices. 4. Lam also enclosing my request and the money order for a recording of the hearing on April 1, 2003 of the above-entitled matter. At the time of my first request it was not necessary for me to notify other litigants if the recording was not to be used in that matter. I wanted the recording to support a personal injury lawsuit. It was not required of me to inform them or you of my intentions. Anyone can buy a copy of the public record. However I now plan to use the recording and the transcript thereof in this matter as well. Therefor I have notified the other litigants as you demanded and have included a copy of the letter to them as support that I have done so. Please forward the recording as soon as possible. In addition I wish to state that I shall try to appear at your Office early Monday morning. I will there to purchase certified or attested copies of all papers, records and docket entries in this matter, As you may know, under the Rules for the District of New Hampshire, all certified copies of pleadings etc must be filed with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court within ten (10) days. There is no time for any delay. The last time T filed a document in your Office, every person you supervise left the room in an obvious attempt to delay my filing the Motion to Dismiss. Surely they cannot avoid me for a whole day if I come early this time and wait. The Motion to Dismiss must be docketed in order for Judge Livingstone to have read and quoted from it. I am delighted that he quoted from the transcript of the September 18, 2002 hearing of Judge Harms. That fact refutes the claim of the Clerk of Norfolk Probate Court that the transcript does not exist. On February 5, 2003, if you wish to recall, it was I who asked you to make. the matters proceed ina timely fashion according to law. At that time you claimed to me that was up to the plaintiffs to proceed and that First Justice Sabaitis had disqualified herself from the matter and that you were not obliged to notify me of that filing. I strongly disagreed with both statements. As defendants we have the right to swift justice and as the Clerk you are required by law to keep us informed of proceedings. JudgeLivingstone has no right to Order anyone to appear before him in a civil action with only five days notice. Byway of my Pretrial Memorandum it is evident that I had planned to removed the matter if it was not dismissed. I was obviously delayed awaiting his decision. The Judge claimed no knowledge of the said recusal. He refused to answer when asked if he could see any evidence of the forgery and fraud of the plaintiffs that was attached to my wife's Affidavit that he had read from. Now I ask you. Do you believe that is my wife's signature or a forgery? The evidence is enclosed once again. In conclusion I will now ask once again the same question I asked you during our only conversation. I told you then that you would receive that question byway of registered mail. Do you understand the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America? Tf so the please review my complaint that is mentioned in paragraph 3 of this letter. Then look at the accountings that are also mentioned in the same paragraph. Do you understand the Civil Rights Violations as explained within the complaint and in open view in the public record of the said accountings? I have every right to sue the Kickhams again and seek even more relief because apparently the amount sought in the first complaints was not enough to make them mend their evil ways. We were entitled Judgments by Default seven months before their filing of more crimes in the public record. Tawait your response. Please take me seriously. I suspect that you would do no less to defend your family and their interests. Do you recall your oath before the bar on 11/14/67? It is time to recall the ethics you were taught as a law student. Perhaps you should appeal to the reasonable nature of a layman whom you summoned a response from. By now you must realize that I have no fear of litigation and will not quit. I strongly suggest that you consider the matter quickly because I will name you as a defendant in my soon to be filed personal injury complaint. I can file that one in any district that I choose. I like to travel and I hear Alaska is nice this time of year. I also like the fact that my native land is situated between Alaska and Massachusetts, but then again, I have always felt at home in Dixie. Also you should consider where home is to a Proud Canadian. I hove every right to file complaints in Canada, whether or not the American Justice System fails to uphold the law. I cannot deny the fact that I am having fun, but it does not logically follow that I am kidding. Many a true word is said in jest. Study my every word, the devil is in the details. Gg) A (Klin David R. Amos PTR AlviW AGE (Vil Tow MA OUBSE 3THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DAVID R. AMOS, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. ) Plaintiff, ) AFFIDAVIT OF NONRESIDENT ALIEN, DAVID R. AMOS ‘Nows comes David R. Amos, a nonresident alien of the District of New Hampshire, and swears under penalty of perjury the reasons why that it has become necessary to temporarily separate myself from my Clan and file my pending personal injury complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. The reasons are as follows: 1. Tama Canadian citizen by birthright and am very proud of it 2. Lama legal permanent resident of the United States of America but I have never revoked my rights as a born and raised Canadian citizen of the Maritime Provinces. 3. Tam entitled to all civil rights under law as a person of both countries. 4, Asa person residing within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts I am involved in many pending litigation in many courts of the said State. In some matters I am a plaintiff in other matters, a defendant. 5. have also legally tried to defend the interests of my Clan of which I am the Chief under a legally executed Durable Power of Attorney by my wife Jean F. O’Meara, In US District Court of Massachusetts it was recognized. However in two state courts it is not and in two other state courts it is.6. That as of this date the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has appointed a Senate Committee to study the Durable Power of Attorney Act. I have no doubt that this has been prompted by my actions in court. Under a Durable Power of Attorney I have more authority to act for another as a layman than any lawyer does, unless they are in possession of one as well. 7. Lam also aware of many recent State and House Bills before the General Court of “Massachusetts that will have a direct negative effect upon our pending litigation. I sincerely believe that is deliberate conspiracy against our Civil Rights that now involves many officers of the Federal Government not acting within the scope of their employment. The proposed state laws are in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. 8, That during the course of the litigation of the past year through the process of discovery and as a result of my private investigation, I now have much evidence of many crimes both federal and state with supporting documentation etc that is irrefutable. I have diligently made every effort to report these Crimes to the appropriate authorities, both state and federal, within and outside of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for over a year. All authorities have refused to review or have denied any crime has been practiced against anyone, 9, Those because of my actions to expose these crimes many false allegations have been made against me, both within the Commonwealth and by Federal Agents, Ihave been threatened to be arrested in front of witnesses by the police for only arguing my right to report a crime.10, That because of recent events, Ihave found it necessary to separate myself from my family for their protection as well as mine. I have the assistance of a friend who will watch over them in my absence and act in my name place and stead under My Durable Power of Attorney while I defend my civil rights and complain of personal injury in the ‘United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire 11, That Ihave now served upon the Office of the US Attomey of the District of New ‘Hampshire all the evidence of my allegations that I have deemed as necessary at this time Thave also sent exact copies of the documents to H. Marshall Jarrett, Counsel of the Office of Professional Responsibility 20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Suite 5100 ‘Washington, D.C. 20530 and to Complaints Examining Unit U.S. Office of Special Counsel1730 M Street, N.W., Suite 201Washington, D.C. 20036-4505Tel: (800) 872- 9855 (202) 653-7188 and to many others whom for now shall remain unnamed 12. That Iam well aware of the law and of the implications of my allegations and that some of the evidence should remain confidential, but I shall determine the time as to ‘when to bring all evidence before the people. It is not my job to prosecute criminals but rest assured I shall complain of them in civil actions in due time. 13. That Ialso plan to defend my interests against those that have offended me in Canadian Federal Court as well, Iwill never back down or settle with a criminal. ‘That is my right as well, I demand the same of my seed and to continue the fight should I fall in this battle. Iam against some very desperate and powerful opponents. It is a very important matter to all and could be compared to dragon slaying. I have no regrets putting forth my best efforts to exposure corruption within a Government obliged to uphold a very well written Constitution, I have never complained of the United States of America orits people, just of certain individuals who have failed to act according to law.14. To whomever does not know me that reads this please allow me to introduce myself: ‘MY NAME IS DAVID RAYMOND AMOS. | am a son of C. Max Amos, who was a son of the Clan Keith. Our names can be found in the book of Keiths that was written with ‘the assistance of an Amos. My oldest ancestor that I can trace, Adam Amos, came out of Scotland and to the New World on or about 1821 and settled on or about a place named ‘Amos Point. Although Thave heard the Amos family referred to as a Clan, I can find no record as such nor of any Tartan of that family. Thus I shall declare my own Clan and separate my Clan from the Clan Keith with respect and affection towards my Kin, Clan ‘Amos begins with me, Ihave chosen to wear the Tartan of Nova Scotia because we are all mutts in the New World, I have deemed it appropriate because it was the First Official Tartan of the New World and by Law anyone can wear it, I wish to remember those from whence I came, my mother Anna, my father Max and my brother Brian Keith Amos. As Chief of the Clan Amos, which has a well-mixed crowd of Septs, I shall wear that Tartan asa sign of pride and to honour my Ancestors. I demand that my descendents do the same with the same respect. My mother honoured me with the name of her favorite brother who was killed in action in Normandy on June 7, 1944, My father honoured me with the name of his Captain and friend who was awarded the Victoria Cross for his bravery and sacrifice in 1944, My beloved baby brother (by just a year and who was born ‘the same year the Tartan came into existence) was honoured by our parents with the Keith name. I lost my brother to the sea as he was having fun fishing like a true Maritimer, However he left this world without descendents. I demand that my children remember my Brother and I in the same breath, as if he were 1. He was a better man than I, The good often die young, as is evidenced by the deaths of my Mother’s Brother, my Father’s Friend and my Brother, I have one son Max Xavier Amos whom I have named in honour of both his Grandfathers to carry on the name of the Clan Amos. I hope that he is fruitful and that the name multiplies. I am already very proud of my son, as 1am of my daughters Laura and Grace. But I must say, in my selfish way, that perchance one day that if he may, name a son, David Brian Amos, my Brother and I would be honoured, ‘My Clan is related to the Kickham Family by Blood. ISAY NAY NO MORE, On May 16, 2002 in front of witnesses, as the Chief of Clan Amos, I declared to James M. Kickham a BLOOD FEUD against the Kickham Family and all those who stand with them and against the Clan. I have forever severed any ties to that family name, They have no honour. I do not respect their name. I mean to do battle with the word not the sword, It is mightier. The proof of all that I state can be found in the following complaint. The evidence of their wrongs can be found in many dockets in the public record. The Kickhams shall receive no quarter from me and I shall never settle with them, only with their friends after they have abandoned their standing with the Kickhams and against Clan Amos. Many people in their ignorance and understanding of me, thought 1 wore the Colors of a Biker, but I ride alone. I a man of my Clan, I wear the Colors of my Native Land, If you doubt what I say, best you look into the history of the Clan Keith and the Hebrew root of our name, then perhaps you may come to an understanding of my nature, Tam true to my word. The Kickhams are liars. To the Keiths I say Veritas Vincit.15. To my seed I must state that with the success of my recent actions my family will eventually be wealthy. Please do not become corrupted by it. Although dragon slaying is considered to be dangerous by many, you should know that your Papa has had more fun than ten men in his attempt to do so, But I have not been reckless but rather quite prudent. Ido believe that the best defense is a smashing offence however one must know when to retreat and go for cover in order to fight again another day. Otherwise you cannot win. ‘The finest of old soldiers taught me that, Corporal Hee Haw. (Old Tom will want to kill me for that, but I told him T would record his nickname in the 48" Highlanders somewhere so that it would never be forgot. He will also laugh as he again states that he has killed many a better man than me long before dawn. I have no doubt that it is a true statement, but he will never do it because he loves me dearly as I do him.) If lose I also know that dead men can tell no tales but their written words may live on if properly recorded. Decent men in their passing leave behind many decent friends who will always ove and protect you. I know that if I cannot be found I cannot be hurt. If someone hurts you they shall have to deal with my Septs and me. Ifthat time happens to come upon us, our offenders will meet a warrior not a reasonable layman, This is their fair warning. STAY AWAY FROM MY KIN. Tdeclare under the pains and penalties of perjury are true and to the best of my knowledge ~ / | fh face Lola A fp ( Dated March 21, 2003 “David R. Amos, Pro Se 153 Alvin Ave, Milton, MA. 02186 Witnessed by (617) 240-6698 wf { teedStatement of the Facts March 20, 2003 T, David R. Amos, state the facts are as follows: That on January 22, 2002 Judge Richard 6, Stearns signed an order substituting the USA as defendant in place of three defendants five months in default in two matters before the court. The Court order was drafted by a lawyer that had no standing and the judge acted because of the Certification of the liar, Michael J. Sullivan, who had not acted within the scope of his own employment. This was done after Judge Stearns had ignored many Local Rules of the US District Court. In this instance, the plaintiffs had fourteen days to respond to the fraudulent acts but the judge acted within eight days. Five doys later the judge granted Motions to Dismiss that were never served upon the plaintiffs in matters seeking relief in the ainount of 48 million dollars. This was done without a hearing and ex parte excluding the plaintiffs. The judge should be aware of the following: Canon 2A of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges provides: "A judge should respect and comply with the law and should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary." 175 F.R.D. 363, 365 (1996). Canon 3A(4) provides that a judge should "neither initiate nor consider ex parte communications on the merits . .. of a pending or impending proceeding." I shall be complaining of this judge and his clerks in many places. During the five months the matters were before US District Court T had received three single pieces of paper. While T had filed an amount measured in feet. During the same period of time the. defendant Judge Carey was acting as her own appelate judge and dismissing an ‘appeals on a matter she never heard and two matters she should not have heard. If this statement displays no respect for the people employed within the government, my point is made, ‘That on January 14, 2003 the Clerk Elaine Flaherty accepted and filed the first Notice of Appearance for the lawyer, Mark Grady, employed as the Assistant US Attorney. This was his third attempt to do so in these matters, The first time he served unsigned undated copies upon only us and filed nothing. The second time sometime after October 15 she slipped into the dockets but did not file undated Notices of Appearances that he claimed he had served upon only us. He did no such thing. This was another example of his perjury and appeared to be filed. On Dec. 12, T pointed these facts out to her and those documents have since disappeared from the dockets but not before I secured certified copies. On his third attempt he failed to date one and served the defendant Cardinal Law in both matters. However he is defendant only in one and he fails to serve the defendant, Kickham Law Offices, of anything on Jan 14. On the other hand he had served us nothing before Tan 14. ‘The lawyer, Grady, lacked the standing to even attempt any action on August 23 according to the Writ of Certiorari hereto attached. This occurred almost five months after he had illegally removed the matters to federal court under sections1141 and 1142 that do not appear to exist. This occurred over one month after I had filed Affidavits pursuant to Rule 55 seeking a Judgment by Default against his purported clients because he had not filed a Notice of Appearance pursuant to the local rules of US District Court and many other reasons as well. The Clerk Flaherty ignored the Affidavits, my letters to her and Rule 55 claiming that everything had to be done byway of Motions before the court. I would like to know what planet she is from. Please view the Affidavits hereto attached within Exhibit A. At the time of his filing the Notices of Removal, Grady’s purported clients, Mark Vespucci Timothy Croston and Charles Blackmore were two days in default in state court. The defendants were complained of as individuals living within the State. The plaintiffs had waited the appropriate six months after properly notifying them of the civil rights violations and the tox fraud etc, and had received no answer. At exactly six months T filed the first complaint. Over two weeks later T served all documents to the US Ambassador to Canada, Angeo Cellucci. This was done to notify the USA that T had a problem that warranted criminal investigation before I served any of the summonses. He is a lawyer licensed to practice in MA. He should have understood the complaints and reported the matters to Attorney General Ashcroft. As Governor of MA., Cellucci had appointed the Register in Norfolk Probate Court and many of the Judges now seated on the various benches throughout the Court System that had failed to uphold the law. All had not acted within the scope of their employment. Particularly in obeying Title 42 sections 1985 and 1986, The defendant Charles Blackmore had even insulted me about the religious persecution byway of joking about it. Mark Vespucci ignored the facts possibly for religious reasons. Timothy Croston's false allegations had no reason. Thad every right to complain of these people as individuals. The government of the USA does not authorize such actions and it is outside the scope of their employment to assist in civil rights violations. For some strange reason the US Attorney was arguing ex parte tax issues in a civil rights complaint where he ha diliberatly omitted the name of the defendant Cardinal Law. However his clients most definitely did not act within the scope of their employment in their investigation of Tax Fraud. T shall prove it with records filed with the IRS. After hearing nothing from the federal government, I served the summons then notified the US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan. I had heard that he was aware of me thus I simply served him the evidence to prove was also aware of him and that he should start acting within the scope of his employment. The proof I of fer in Exhibit C are IRS records I received during the process of discovery. ‘The actions of the US Attorney, US Ambassador and the MA Attorney General forever brought the matter under Federal Jurisdiction without my having to state. that Iam an Alien. The proof I of fer within Exhibit B are copies of documents served upon me by the US Attorney on Aug 24 ond my proof of services upon them. The documents provided by the US Attorney show the date and fox numbers of federal of fices in New York City that were studying the matters for some timebefore that date. The statements they were most concerned about were highlighted. They can never claim that they did not view Civil Rights Violations under the First Amendment. Neither can you after you view Exhibit 8. It is very obvious that the US Attorney was acting under the supervision of Attorney General Ashcroft. Therefore T will amend these complaints to include Ashcroft, Sullivan, Cellucci and the man who appointed them George Bush. They act under his direct supervision and he gave an oath to defend the Constitution. The Honorable Alberto R. Gonzales, Counsel to the President, The White House, Washington, D.C. 20500 has been sent much for him to review. The fact that my answers to Abigail Shaine's Motion to Dismiss disappeared and the fact that State Officials were calling me on federal phones I had no doubt that the Feds were crooks. But T did not know why were so many powerful people protecting an aged evil lawyer against me until later. Upon viewing the tax records provided to me by the Deutch bastards T saw that everyone is covering up for the Brookline Bank. I am about to prove it bigtime. The state court has now handed over Judgment by Default on the Kickhams, the Court appointed trustee and his law firm hoping that this will appease me no doubt. Not by a long shot are the matters over. On March 17" after waiting almost two months for the matters that took one day to remove to get back to Norfolk Superior Court, I was then allowed to discuss with the Clerk, Mary Hickey, the matters and her interpretation of Rule 55. Once she had admitted to me that she had read the affidavits pursuant to Judgement by Default and the attachments. T clearly stated that she is now aware of many of the reasons the matters should not have been remanded from federal court. In particular the Mail fraud of the Attorney General is mentioned in Tort and the evidence is attached to the Affidavits. She ignored that statement and only wished to argue as to whether or not state rules applied to an affidavit filed in accordance to federal rules. Her silly ‘argument that I was my obligation to file for default in state court on August 24"" against the State Defendants is moot in light of the facts. The facts are that I notified the Clerk's Office on Aug 26" that the matter was about to be removed illegally from state jurisdiction and that I wished to file an Emergency Motion to oppose it with the Clerk's assistance, A lady named Marge in the Clerks Office then stated that they were not aware of it and then another woman came to the phone and declared that they were too busy to talk to me and that they would inform me when they did become aware. They removed the matter from state court the following day, the 27 and not as they state in their letters as the 23". On August 30" T contacted the Clerks office in order to see if the Kickhan Low Offices had filed anything without my knowledge because they were then in default ‘as well. The Clerks Office then informed me that the matters had been removed. Later Clerk Hurley informed me that Clerk Hickey was the one that allowed the Removal and that the man who had tried to pick the fight with me in front of my son and other witnesses was her Assistant, George Berube. When T finally learned that man's name T could only smile because T knew of a lawyer by that name whoalso was not a very nice fellow. T strongly suspect that they are kin. At the end of my conversation with Mary Hickey on March 17, T asked her that since she had read the Affidavits and had viewed the attached Exhibits that she now was aware of much misconduct by lawyers and that would she now stand with me in my complaints. She ducked the question and considered me a threatening person. T have heard that before from many clerks that have nothing better to say. I later received from her four judgments of default but no notice of remand to federal court. Thus I have done so myself. I shall add her name to the Amended Complaints, Tt is no threat, just a simple fact of the matter. I gave Mary Hickey a chance to display her trustworthiness to me, However, she practiced malice against me. Hopefully all future arguments between us will be heard by a jury. That the proof of all that I state should be found within the Dockets of U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts docket no. 02-11686-RGS and 02- 11687-RGS. Mony documents relating to these matters had not been filed or had disappeared from the record. In order to insure that every necessary document would be recorded in the public record I attached exact copies of all documents to the letters T filed with the Clerk Elaine Flaherty on Oct 17" and Oct 25" of 2002 or to the Affidavits T filed on Dec 12. 2002 pertaining to Rule 55 in both matters. When Cardinal Law stepped down the following day I was not surprised. I am now attaching other documents that I have received since that time and other documents that I have thus far chosen net to file in the public record. I file these documents under the rules of confidentiality of this court. I am also well aware that the documents display irrefutable proof of many crimes and that any officer of the Court that views the document must up hold the law and report the crimes to the proper authorities in order that the allegations be properly investigated and the criminals prosecuted. T have provided this statement of facts with the attached documents to many other authorities, After what I have witnessed in Federal Court, State Courts and elsewhere, I cannot afford to trust anyone employed by the Government of the USA. Do with this statement what you will. shall be complaining of Judge Stearns, his Clerks, Michael J. Sullivan, his Assistant cand anyone else I chose for personel injury in another District, as is my right. I am merely awaiting a response from all that I sent this statement to. Tt is not within the scope of my employment to uphold the law under oath of of fice. I did however make an cath to my wife and children forsaking all others. Any one that offends them must deal with me. That is well within the scope of my rights and duties as a husband and father. Tam merely defending our rights os Thomas Jefferson advised within his famous preamble. The evils of this government have become insufferable and many of its people are now protesting that fact as well as most of the world. I merely offer proof of the offenses against my Clan and proof of Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment violations of others. I have also made digital copies of every thing. I have posted most on the World Wide Web with the exception of some that I chose to keep confidential for a time as T seek a trustworthy federal‘employee. My luck in that quest has not been good thus far, therefore T have decided to put alot people that are in civil service over a barrel and force them to be honest. This T did to the lawyer, James McLaughlin, on OCT 16, 2002. Tf it worked once it should work twice. ‘The lawyers will have to deal with the logic and ethics of a bike mechanic rather than that of one of their own ilk. All are confused by the fact that we will not settle. The reason is so simple T should not have to explain. For the sake of brevity and to put all in the same boat as us, I must explain the obvious. If we settle with criminals, we break the law. We are well aware of Tax Fraud ete. our assistance in the cover up would make us guilty of the very crimes that were practiced against us. Any member of the bar that views the attachments to this document should know what he must do or I shall be due to sue him too. Judge Carey quoted that statement and the Attorney General attached her quote to his perjury in an effort to dismiss complaints that proved that Tam aman of my word, All courts treat us like criminals rather than plaintiffs with valid complaints. Tt would be ridiculous for anyone to consider that an ordinary men and wife with young children would set out to complain of the most powerful lawyers in the land Pro Se without some very good reasons, All I need is one jury somewhere and their goose is cooked. T already have Judgment against the Kickham Law Offices, the Court appointed Trustee and his Law Firm. The rest will go down like dominoes. My latest task is to corner all the politicians that have been well aware of everything and ignored the rules. Some. have deliberately acted against us T do not wish for them to suddenly appear to stand with us. You or T must expose their corruption first. Tf you think that T am wrong please sue me, it will save me the cost of filing on you and then T will have a jury decide who is right and who is wrong. Check my work to see if Iam a serious man playing the part of a fool that has a fool for a client. At first it may appear that I am foolish to not care what you think of me, but beware of what I may think of you. I will not hesitate or back down and it now looks like I may soon afford a law firm or two. I consider the relief of the first judgments as just oil to prime the pump. After I have proved my point the well flows on its own. Either way I don't care, the book will sell, you pick your part in it. You know it will be a true story. No ‘one would throw away thirty two million dollars to try te peddle a lie. You have no need to wonder why I speak so plainly. I am well aware that you are well aware of me. Your decision no doubt will be based on whether or not T can prove it and how your interests will be affected. As a businessman many years ago I learned that if I appealed properly to the other person's greed, T always had a sale. T have also learned that it is wiser to wager against a lawyer's sense of ethics than to bet that he even knows the definition. If he is a lawyer and a politician, all bets are of f. One sad but true fact is when a lawyer or Treasury Agent encounter an honest man with relevant legal points they immediately ask him if he is a member of their club. When he tells them that he is not they then call him a liar or worse. That's standard operating procedure. (Ask Sumner Gillette or Mark Vespucci) T can't saywhat a politician would say. T have never voted because in the past the only one that would permit to speak for me I could not vote for. His name is Jimmy Carter. At least he now has my blessings inserted in the public record. In the present I may allow another farmer, Chuck Grassley we should meet first though, so that we may look into the windows of each other's souls. Thave alluded to many other crimes in this statement. Whereas this statement shall be placed in the public record at some point, I have deliberatly not expanded upon the facts in order to protect the innocent and not afford the guilty an opportunity to get away. I will attach the evidence of the other crimes and present it to those that I deem fit to receive it. One very important fact of one thing I did that was witnessed is that on October 15, 2002 T tried to give the FBI all evidence and they refused to even look at it. The FBI agent that would not give me her name said they were too busy going to war with Iraq to be concerned with my minor matters. At that point in time T had a nephew in Bosnia and another in Afghanistan doing American bidding. She had no idea how offensive her statement was to me so T informed her. I asked her who she worked for and she considered that an insulting question. I pointed to the sign in her of fice with reference to Title !8 and then to the photograph of Ashcroft over her head and asked her why I should not sue them all for ignoring criminal activity. She invited me to do so. You do not have to ask me twice, but twice within the hour T had heard the same thing. Deputy Sheriff Larry McGrath had just asked me to do the same thing. With regard to the First Amendment and the freedom of the press I must state +that the press abuses that right in an interesting way, Many Members of the press in many places have been made well aware of the truth for a year. Yet it scems they prefer to plead the Fifth Amendment and remain silent. Therefore I will not speak to the press about these matters but T may point to things to investigate for themselves. The only person that will speck in a national public forum about this is Oprch Winfrey and only if she allows David Letterman to accompany me under contract with me to remain silent. T suspect his great face will convey his thoughts. T make this offer because that is the kind of guy I am that no lawyer seems to oppreciate, Most Kings Courts in the past had a jester. T believe it may be the finest vocation within the system. Too bad we could not ask Will Rogers, Robert Service, Shel Silverstein or Shakespeare if they agree with me. Methinks they do. Trealize that this statement is one page too long for one place that it is filed. I do not care. You have all authorities ignore you, have the justice system behave so poorly against you, have many make false allegations against you, and then be threatened to be arrested while trying to protect your rights and report crimes ‘against you, then see how much you would have to state. You will also find yourself ignoring a ridiculous rule or two. I must say Good Day to me kids, Papa will be home ‘as soon as the rats turn on each other. There is no honour amongst thieves. Watch me prove it and then laugh with me as one rat sends another to jail. At least our little Clan knows the very well-written fairy tale of the Truth About Money. ae _f it [Jam esarced /) bed fOr" GORG153357838-2 Delivered on 2002-07-16 13:13 by our facility in Ottawa Signed for by: BERTRAND Postal code: KIN G153357839-0 Delivered on 2002-07-16 10:41 by our facility in Toronto Signed for by: GORDON Postal code: MSI PARCEL SHIPPING ORDER CUSTOMER (please print) Ea ads ered me a y 198857838-2 cod bool roa anorcie - ) ~o1688fis00 Sophie | MAIL BOXES ETC. #291; 1 2 Queen Street St. cathasines ON L2R SG3 { 05) 682-7999 } Fx (308) 682-3426August 12, 2002 To Whom it may concern, Tama little confused as to who does what in Massachusetts. Maybe someone can enlighten me. Should not the Governor ask the Supreme Court to check the work of those under their wing? Why does the U.S. Attorney not investigate the allegations that apply to title 18? How come the Candidates for Governor don't find this an interesting matter to talk about? Why is everyone from my wife's family to the Probate Court to the IRS calling me a bad guy or crazy? I have done nothing wrong. Thave only sought JUSTICE in the effort to protect my kin. Maybe at least one member of the press should have taken the time from their busy day to listen to me for a moment. Now it is my time to turn the worm and ignore them. Good bye to Mean O! Bean Town. I just went fishing, but I will be back in time for my day in court and I shall have lots to ask and say. Please leave my family alone. They have suffered enough and my personal injury suit already has the potential to set a new record. Have fun tearing up each other for awhile. I will be back to stir the stew and add something tasty. cya n Cy | (Ue 7 PS, I have taken the steps to copyright my own words. You choose your own. I dare anyone to speak as plainly as I. Beware though, telling the truth may be dangerous. Bad guys don't like that.ST Craig oe aaa) e pista er TM rsa testy a Pare eet CULO RIS tol Ee reenter ce APBSETICIAL USE| 7 eas 2 is certain ag SS 3 8 a ie Fe ee i 2 Greate Pompey ie se 3 ee oc te Pow (UA 02 405-Ip! Tpammiiaeeteere A ce 3e 8 fet cameo Pacer ees pose esr ea ET ey Pig aia seg Baa is Saat es CE roan ena erent oe OFF “ews hee 2 3289 SBS endeeces coeds, 7001 0360 ono Pray Meta caterer See rea at UN al rnb eye senor ip altace S evecare SB sommiecen, 3 aces aan Poa Ft | 3 gaftenteatss|5. PoslatBorvica : CU Moai (ead io feared 7 paola sc aka ee ate, 2 : BMS Room Boe esto MA 92133 Trl eS ereOctober 23,2002 Served by Certified Mail and much proof will be served in hand to the Globe, Fox News, W856 and others on Oct 24/02 Attn Shannon O'Brien Barbara Johnson Michael Cloud Brian Joyce I have become aware of quite a remarkable conspiracy against my family's interests and all of our civil rights. The facts of the matter are so self evident, it is astounding so many people in prominent positions would show their ass to cover a crook. The enclosed documentation explains the matters and displays irrefutable evidence of the facts. May I suggest that you folks have a little read and make a few calls to verify the truth. I have served the enclosed documentation upon you with witnesses and have already drafted my complaints under Title 18. I am merely listening closely for a few days to see which politician's stand with me or against me. If you say nothing, I shall complain of you as part of the said conspiracy under Title 18. Read some of the documentation. I’thoroughly explain why. There is no need to serve Romney again. Kerry must have been aware of the matter for many months, as no doubt O'Brien is. However I must serve both with the undeniable evidence to give them fair warning before acting against them. My biggest concern is desperate federal authorities. The US Ambassador to Canada was served in July with all information. The actions of the IRS and the FBI are questionable to say the least. The fax numbers on the top of some of the US Attorney's documents have spoken volumes to me.A good place to’ verify the truth of all that I have stated, would be to call or visit the Norfolk Probate Court and inquire as to the testimony and ruling in the trial of Jean F. O'Meara v. William J. Kickham docket no. 98 P 0792-E2, T2 on __October 16, 2002. A defendant in US District Court, James A. McLaughlin, affirmed of all of my allegations, including fraud, perjury, tax fraud, larceny and the violations to First Amendment Rights. Perhaps you should call McLaughlin and get it straight from the horse's mouth. Don't bother calling me, I ain't talking. I just went hunting ‘one is supposed to be silent, it is a mandatory part of the sport. I have tried to talk to you and have always been ignored or promptly dismissed. You know who you are and I am telling all about you very soon. You folks talk the talk. Let's see if you walk the walk. I have already drafted the first lawsuit under Title 18 and am merely polishing it up..It should be filed on or before Election Day. I am a Proud’ Canadian thus I cannot register to vote but I can register my complaint on Election Day. I am also the Proud Father and Guardian of two Yankees. Their vote of faith in me counts big time in my book. I am merely checking my list of defendants and making certain just who is naughty and who is nice. Do with this what you will. As you can tell many people as well as members of the press have been aware of the matters for months as well. They think I may be crazy but I think worse of them. At least they can't say that I didn't stir something tasty into the stew. : ay S ie (ur P.S. I will seek relief of one Gold Dollar from the USA and from the Commonwealth, one Silver Dollar. All others I will do my best to bankrupt as a lesson to all liars that are lawyers.eter sa Prete =n al Prspesdenrny PTT Aad ee SE aaa SARWSER oS = eae A pra) recs ae i Pe aia 7002 0530 0000 W695 0398 * i 9. 2oh a S| __ z US. Postat Service 4 srs a ed a s Pca sir aareiee e 8 2 a 3 eae a fers gn mace 4 Pepeaiernet ae Moa Efneed ee [sroimn fe/Leties... Lave. ani NE _C1ELG SG U.S..Postal Servic Relsciigy MAIL RECEIPT Fecal ai aa nee ei a wy pee hE ale a Love pees. cree ee CANDeuG-15-2002 13:41 GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES 212 436 1438 P04 ‘THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS NORFOLK, ss. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT DAVID RAMOS ct al ) ) Plaintift d ) . ‘Givil Action NO. 02-01070 WILLIAM J. KICKHAM, ~ BRIAN J. KICKHAM, ~ MICHAEL KICKHAM, - KICKHAM LAW OFFICES, © DEUTSCH, WILLIAMS, BROOKS. DERENSIS & HOLLAND PC, - GOGUEN, McLAUGHLIN, RICHARDS) & MAHANEY, LLP, — HON. PAULA M. CAREY,~ HON. ROBERT W. LANGLOIS,~ JOHN B. JENNEY JR, — THOMAS F. REILLY, ~ ) KATHRYN DOWLING SILVERIA, JOHN HUNTER CROSS, RICHARD P. SCHMIDT, HON. MARGOT GARDNER BOTSFORD, )~ HON. CATHERINE P. SABAITIS, ~ HON. WILLIAM W. TEAHANJR,- ——) SALLY LIVINGSTON, KONSTANTINA VAGENAS, ) GILLIAN ELISE PEARSON, ) WILLIAM E. BERSTEIN, GAEL MAHONEY, HENRY T. A. MONIZ, JOHN G. GALLUP, ROBERT J. GUTTENTAG, 5 MICHAEL A. FREDRICKSON,? ) DANIEL C. CRANE,*8° JOHN W. MARSHALL, > CONSTANCE V, VECCHIONE, JOHN O. MIRICK, ‘THOMAS EDWARD PEISCH, MITCHEL H, KAPLAN, MARK I, BERSON, 7 d d ) ) 7 y d d } ? » } ) » d } ) d ) ) ) ) ) ) )eug-19-2082 13:41 GENERAL, LEGAL SERVICES 212 435 1438 PLS ELIZABETH N. MULVEY, M, ELLEN CARPENTER, JANET KENTON-WALKER, CONSTANCE L. RUDNICK, MARYANNE FRANGULES, DAVID M, RIND MD., TIMOTHY G. CROSTON, MARK A. VESPUCCI, CARDINAL BERNARD F. LAW, DEIRDRE ROSENBERG, ABIGAIL SHAINE, SUMNER B. GILLETTE, DAVID M. BUTLER, WILLIAM R. KEATING Defendants, AMENDED COMPLAINT 1, The plaintiff, David R, Amos states that he prays to amend the complaint against the above stated defendants in order to correct spelling errors, expand upon on some of the siatements, to alter the exhibit format from numeral to alphabetical, to add documents to Exhibits and to change the contact phone number of plaimiff due to unwarranted interruption of service by Sprint PCS. No thanks to Joan ID # PO3MVANCEOI to recsify the matter. 2, Now comes the plaintiff, David R. Amos and states that William J. Kickham as trustee of the trust of Elaine G. Kickham, Norfolk Probate # 98 P.0792-T1 gave funds to charities. That is a criminal offence under the provisions of this law, M. G. L Chapter 266: Section $7. These illegal disbursements were included in the accountings prepared and petitioned to the Norfotk Probate Court by the attomey. Charles 3, Kickham Jr. of the Kickham Law Offices in his capacity a5 Altomey of Record for said trust. The Kickham Law Offices are compelled by law to bbe aware of all laws of the State of Massachusetts in the preparation of accounts on behalf of their clients.eus-19-2a02 13:41 GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES 212 436 1438 PE M. G. L Chapter 266: Section 57. Fiduciaries; embezzlement. Section $7. A trustee under an express trust created by a deed, will or other instrument in writing, or 2 guardian, conservator, executor or administrator, or any person upan of to whom such a trust has devolved or come, who embezzles or fraudulently converts or appropriates money, goods or propery held or possessed by him for the use or benefit, either wholly or partially, of some other person or for a public or charitable purpose, to or for his own use or benefit or to or for the use or benefit of any person other than such person as aforesaid, or for any purpose other than such public or charitable purpose as aforesaid, or who otherwise fraudulently disposes of or destroys ‘such propeny, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than ten years or by a fine of not more than two thousand dollars and imprisonment in jail for net more than ‘two years, Please view Exhibit A. 3. The plaintiff further states that these funds were given to charitable organizations of the Catholic religion. The Catholic Church must not be allowed to receive stolen funds and should be charged under criminal law as any individual would be if caught in the possession of stolen propery. For the Church to say that they had no idea of the source of their windfall is no defense of the church reaping the benefit of the crime, They are obliged to check the source or suffer the consequences. The plaintiff holds their supervisor ultimately responsible whereas he lives over the store as he stated in a recent deposition on another matter before the courts. This matter was reported on more than one occasion by the plaintiff to the Assistant Attomey General's office a1 Room 1413 One Ashburton Place, Boston, He was never permitted to speak to Dierde Rosenberg. The plaintiff was told by a paraleyal employed in that office that they simply did not care and to take up the matter with the Board of Bar Overseers. Please view Exhibit A, 4. The plaintiff further states that his family has an interest in said trust although the name of his wife, Jean F. O'Meara is not listed as a residuary beneficiary on Norfolk Probate # ‘98 P 0792-T1. Please view Exhibit B. S. The plaintiff further states that the reason his wife is not listed as a residuary beneficiary onus-19-2002 13:41 GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES 212 436 1438 P.O? suid trust is because of fraud practiced upon the Norfolk Probate and Family Court by the Jawyer and their cousin, Charles J. Kickham Jr. and his Law Firm with the assistance of John B. Senney Jr. of the Norfolk Probate and Family court. The Kickham Law Office perpetuated this fraud in order that they could assist William J. Kickham, as executor and trustee of the trust of the Estate of Elaine G. Kickham to steal the bulk of the assets of the estate of Elaine G. Kickham. Please view Exhibit B. 6, The plaintiff further states that Jean F. O’Meara was intimidated into signing the first page of the first accounting of said trust without viewing the actual account. This and other matters are in dispute in the Norfolk Probate Court and the trials are scheduled for October 2002. 7. The plaintiff further states that he is aware this is a civil action about criminal offences. He has no other recourse whereas the above named defendants who are obliged by the rules of their office to prosecute crimes after becot oo in December of 2001, The plaintiff states that a great deal of th matters have ignored th aware of it beginning lence of that fact is in the dockets numbered 98 P 0792-E1 and 97 P 0288-E1 of the public record of the Norfolk Probate and Family Coun. Whereas most ofthe defendants already have copies of most documents from the said dockets it is unnecessary to attach that proof this complaint. tn the pending wrial of this complaint. certified copies of said dockets will be obtained from said count and placed into evidence. §, The plaintiff further states that the above named defendants who are members of the bar are 4s guilty as Charles J, Kickham Jr. in his crimes by their disobedience to the rules of conduct. 9. The plaintiff further states that this complaint is not about money but it is money he seeks byway of punitive damages. It is about many members ofthe bar and layman alike offending the civil liberties of the plaintiff and his family white in the pursuit of justice for his family.fuG-15-2002 13:41 GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES 212 436 1438 P.O 10. The plaintiff further states that he, his wife and children are not Catholic. The plaintiff will not allow his children anywhere near that church but for weddings and funerals for manly reasons of his own. Some of those reasons are in the news today. 11, ‘The plaintiff further states that his wife, Jean F, O'Meara was indoctrinated into that religion 6 achild but upon reaching sdulthood she has had no respect for that church, its doctrines or its clergy. In suppon thereof. David R. Amos and Jean O'Meara were married in a Civil Court before a Judge. They practice no religious beliefs what so ever. as is their right. 12. The plaintiff further states that itis religious persecution te steal {rom another and give ito» religion of your own that the aggrieved person has no faith in, Its an offence to that person's freedom of religion and a crime. 13, The plaintifT further states that to deliberately assist that person in perpetuating that crime is 8 crime as well. Please view Exhibit C. 14. The plaintiff further states that to use a position or office within the justice system 1a protect a criminal is a worse crime. It also tramples the offended parties right 10 swift justice, 15, The plaintiff forther states that starting from the lawyer, Charles J, Kickham Jr. who assisted the crook William J. Kickham to the clerks and judges in the Probate Court, the Board of Bar Overseers. the Commission on Judicial Conduct, the Norfolk District Attorneys Office, the FBI, the IRS and the Attomey General's Office all have viewed the blatant theft and civil rights offences and denied or ignored them. This has caused the plaintifY to call this the case of Hear No Evil, See No Evil, Speak No Evil. That is against the law. They are obliged to enforce the law. To the plaiatiff"s knowledge only the Norfolk District Attorneys Office hax not viewed ‘these matters because they would not give him an audience because the thief was a lawyer they Simply referred him to the Board of Bar Overseers. The plaintiff maintains that a crime is a crimeMue-ay-2082 13:42 GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES supervisor I makes no difference if a member of the bar commits it. He therefore holds 1 responsible for their neglect of duty. 16. The plaintiff further states that many of the defendants involved have felt free to lie and den due process according to law, all the while trying to impeach the plaintiff's character. ‘The plaintiff clearly states that the public needs to hear of this matter and see it before & jury. particularly before the upcoming election. 17. The plaintiff further states that he has heard that judges etc. are immune to civil action. The plaimifT disagrees he views them a individuals who have acted as part of conspiracy to steal fiom bis family. 10 deny him of bis civil rights and attack bis freedom of religion, To the plaiati the term honorable reflects character and deeds, not of some political appointment, 18, The plaintiff seeks punitive damages of one million dollars for each of his family members auainst cach of the defendants jointly and or severally. That amounts to one hundred and eighty ight millon dollars ($188,000,000,00), The plaintiff is aware thatthe figure may seem absurd but it must be considered whereas there are four plaimiffs within the aggrieved family, 10 of whom are minors under guardianship of their father by birthright. All have been offended by forty seven other panies both jointly and severally. To ask for a million dollars punitive damage for each plaintiff from each defendant is not exorbitant upon considering the offence. The assets of the plaintiffs and the assets of the defendams should also be considered by the jury in their judgement for punitive damages if the plaintiff prevails. 11 is not the Eault of the plaintiff that the defendants chose to yang up against his family. He did not pick this fight. He had given them all fair warning as was quoted by Judge Carey in her Coun Order in Exhibit C. The plaintiff states that he will accept whatever the jury decides if he prevails but prays it is enough to make the justice system take steps to see that this does not happen again.PuG~19-2002 13:42 GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES 212 436 1435 P 19, The plaintiff Further states that he has come up against a cormupt system of justice that ‘everyone knows exists. The plaintiff wuly expected to find relief and justice served at each step ‘but to no avail and his amazement, The matter then became a personal challenge to see if he ‘could put the wrongs to right on his own. There is no lawyer ghosting these documents. This has deen Pro Se thus far all the way with no assistance from anyone. The nature of the plaimiff deemed him to take no other course and he scoffs at che haughty snotty defendants for underestimating his tenacity. tn the pending trial abe plaintiff may smite Jot but he means no disrespect, itis his nature not 1o do anything with out some effort to have fut at the same time, The plaintifTis aware of the magnitude of the task and considers this no joking ‘matter. in light of the legal. religious and political connections of his cousia, Charles J. Kickham Jt, alone, this matter must be taken seriously by all, The plaintiff is a simple, sincere and serious ‘man who is not intimidated by the defendants or their wit, wealth and wrath, Please view Exhibit D. 20. The plai further states that he has taken steps 10 expose that cormuption and has already inserted it in the public record. That proof was stricken from the public record by Court Order. ‘was placed back into the dockets. The plaintiff has also kept a journal of this endeavor and has named it PRO SE ONCE REMOVED. 21. The plainti€€ further states that he has approached the Attorney General three times in his best effort to convince hinn that the matters of Jean FO” Meara v. Charles J. Kickham Jr. and Jean F. 0°Meara v. William 5. Kickham warrants an investigation under Title 18, The plainitt has visited his office twice in person and the third time byway of registered leiter. The Attomey General's Office should remember the plaintiff. During the first visit they considered arrest him as 2 threat to them. The second visit they kept him waiting awhile before refusing to meet.GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES 212 435 1438. ‘The third contact of the plaintifT to the Attorney General was byway of registered letter sent to him as well as various members of the Board of Bar Overseers, the Commission on Judicial ‘Conduct and two politicians. All of who had in their possession all other supporting documentation. ‘Whereas the Atomey General has failed to respond and chosen 10 ignore the plaintiff, he therefore has made himself'a defendant in this complaint. The plaintif¥ states ifthe Attorney General docs not give the plaintiff an answer as to why the said matters do not warrant an _ " investigation under the Rico Laws within two weeks, the plaintiff may elect to prove it on his ‘own, and include the Attorney General in that complaint as well. The plaintiff has also informed the FBI and the 1RS of the crimes related to these matters and thus far has been ignored as well, 22. The plaintiff further states that he feels certain he can prove this complaint and a complaint a one under Title 18 before a jury of his peers. He will stand by a jury's decision of this complaint, He will also stand proud before his children, Win or fose one must speak for rights against wrongs. 1( makes no difference to the plaintiff the number and strength of the opposition. A father can say anything and a child will befieve him, But after his child matures itis the ‘deeds of that father that will count more than his wards ta the child. ‘That stated, the plaintiff's descendants may some day look into this matter and read his words and know of what he has done, He prays to them (o obey his demand to be honest and wishes to inform them that there are no degrees to honesty in his book. So for now and until the end of time the plaintiff bids his seed a Good Day and tothine own self please be TrueFuUG-19-2002 13:42 GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES Jury Demand THE PLAINTIFF DEMANDS A JURY TRIAL ON ALL ISSUES SO TRIABLE ‘Wherefore the plait David R. Amos respectfully requests that the Court grant him the following relief. (a) award him damages against all defendants, jointly and severally in an amount determined by the jury, plus statutory interest. (b) award his casts reasonably incurred and expended by him in the mectssary prasecution of this Complaint including reasonable attorney fees; and (©) grant him such other and further relief as the Court deems proper and just. Dated: July 23, 2002 Pl Kor David R. Amos 133 Alvin Ave, Milton MA, 02186 (617) 240-6698