Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • Row Housing Design and Case Study

    Încărcat de

    KruthiKolli
    2K vizualizări27 pagini
    This document describes a row housing project in Domalguda, Hyderabad designed by architect B.V. Doshi in 1979. The project consisted of 110 row houses arranged in a terraced style, with common walls shared between neighboring houses. Each house had an area of 16'x60' with minimum common parking areas and plinth heights. The houses utilized features like courtyards, cross ventilation, and skylights to maximize natural lighting while minimizing window space. The overall design encouraged interaction between neighbors through connected terraces and a low compound wall height.

    Descriere originală:

    architecture

    Titlu original

    Row Housing casestudy

    Drepturi de autor

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formate disponibile

    PPTX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    This document describes a row housing project in Domalguda, Hyderabad designed by architect B.V. Doshi in 1979. The project consisted of 110 row houses arranged in a terraced style, with common walls shared between neighboring houses. Each house had an area of 16'x60' with minimum common parking areas and plinth heights. The houses utilized features like courtyards, cross ventilation, and skylights to maximize natural lighting while minimizing window space. The overall design encouraged interaction between neighbors through connected terraces and a low compound wall height.

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca PPTX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    2K vizualizări27 pagini

    Row Housing Design and Case Study

    Încărcat de

    KruthiKolli
    This document describes a row housing project in Domalguda, Hyderabad designed by architect B.V. Doshi in 1979. The project consisted of 110 row houses arranged in a terraced style, with common walls shared between neighboring houses. Each house had an area of 16'x60' with minimum common parking areas and plinth heights. The houses utilized features like courtyards, cross ventilation, and skylights to maximize natural lighting while minimizing window space. The overall design encouraged interaction between neighbors through connected terraces and a low compound wall height.

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca PPTX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 27

    ROW HOUSING

    K. KRUTHI
    P.MONIKA
    M.SUSMITHA
    P.MEDHA
    M.ASHWINI
    B.SWATHI

    DESKTOP
    STUDY
    INTRODUCTION
    :
    A TERRACED HOUSE
    OR A TOWN HOUSE IS
    A TERM IN
    ARCHITECTURE & CITY
    PLANNING REF. TO A
    STYLE OF MEDIUM
    DENSITY HOUSING.
    ORIGINATION OF
    ROW HOUSING IN
    EUPROPE ARROUND
    16TH CENTURY.

    TOWN HOUSES
    GENERALLY OF TWO
    TO THREE STOREY
    HOUSES WHERE WE
    SEE COMMON WALL
    SHARED BY
    NEIGHBOURING
    HOUSES.
    FIRST & LAST
    HOUSES IN A ROW
    ARE SAID TO HAVE
    END TERRACES.
    MIDDLE HOUSES
    SAID TO HAVE MID
    TERRACES .

    CASE
    STUDY
    LOCATION :
    DOMALGUDA
    LIC HOUSING.
    HYDERABAD.
    ARCHITECT : BV DOSHI
    PROJECT YR. : 1979
    AREA : EACH HOUSE
    AREA 16X 60 &
    10X10
    TOTAL NUMBER OF
    HOUSES : 110
    ROAD WIDTH : 5M

    THEY HAVE 3 TYPES OF


    HOUSES.
    EACH ONE HAS A
    DIFFERENT GATE .
    12X15 IS THE
    MINIMUM COMMON
    PARKING AREA.
    45 CM IS THE COMMON
    PLINTH HEIGHT.
    ENTRANCE DOOR
    WIDTH IS 1.2M

    THEY HAVE A INCLINED


    WALL BESIDE
    ENTRANCE WALL WITH
    A SQUARE WINDOW
    USED BY OWNERS FOR
    PEEPING TPWARS
    ENTRANCE.
    THEY HAD A
    COURTYARD NOW USED
    AS A COMMON SHAFT
    PLACED B/W BOTH
    HOUSES.
    CROSS VENTILATIONN
    IS SEEN.

    WC & BATH AREAS


    ARE SEPARETED .
    THEY HAVE BEDROOM
    ON EACH LANDING.
    SKY LIGHT WAS USED
    BUT IN INDOIRECT
    WAY HENCE I.E MAIN
    SOURCE OF
    VENTILATION.
    USAGE OF WINDOWS
    IS LESS.

    LESS IS MORE
    EVERY BEDROOM IS
    SPACIOUS.
    HEIGHT OF COMMON
    COMPOUND WALL IS
    1M.
    CONCEPT OF HAVING LESS
    HEIGHT COMPOUND WALL
    ENCOURAGES MORE
    INTERACTION B/W
    NEIGHBOURS.

    TERRACES ARE
    CONNECTED.

    THE DINNING AND


    KITCHEN SPACE IS 2
    STEPS BELOW .

    KITCHEN INTERIOR

    LEFT SIDE WE HAVE


    THE STAIRCASE
    LEADING TO ABOVE.
    WE COULD SEE THE
    LIVING ROOM .

    ENTRANCE
    BACKSIDE OF THE WE
    COULD SEE STORAGE
    .
    WE HAVE A FIXED
    WINDOW ABOVE THE
    ENTRANCE DOOR.

    LEFT SIDE WINDOW


    IS SEE THROUGH
    ONE.

    STAIRCASE LEADING
    TO UPPER FLOORS.

    WE HAVE A
    BEDROOM ON EVERY
    LANDING.

    BEDROOM

    CUTOUT SPACE
    DIRECT LIGHTING
    FROM ABOVE.

    BEDROOM
    SMALL WINDOW IN
    BEDROOM. BUT HAVE
    AMPLE OF LIGHTING.

    1ST LANDING
    BEDROOM IS SEEN.
    ON LEFT WE HAVE
    THE CUT OUT SPACE.

    BEDROOM

    RIGHTSIDE DOOR IS
    LEADING TO THE
    TERRACE

    STEPS LEADING TO
    TERRACE

    SERVICE DUCTS

    THESE ARE
    WINDOWS FROM
    WHICH LIGHT ENTRE
    INTO THE HALL.

    ROW HOUSES
    INBETWEEN WERE
    HAVING CONNECTED
    BALCONIES.
    UTILITY SPACES
    WERE DIFFERENT
    FOR DIFFERENT
    HOUSES.
    MOST OF THE
    HOUSES ARE
    TRASFORMED INTO
    MODERN HOMES.

    S-ar putea să vă placă și