Dr.

Christi Sanders, MSMO147 HRMT535A 03/18/13

Dr. Christi Sanders

MSMO147 HRMT535A 03/18/13 (MSMO147 HRMT535A)
No. of responses = 12
No. of enrolled = 13
% returned = 92.31

Overall indicators

Global Index

1. COURSE CONTENT

2. INSTRUCTOR

av.=4.47
dev.=0.76

av.=4.4
dev.=0.8

av.=4.53
dev.=0.71

Survey Results

Legend

Relative Frequencies of answers

Std. Dev.
25%

Question text

Mean
0%

Median
50%

0%

n=No. of responses
av.=Mean
md=Median
dev.=Std. Dev.
ab.=Abstention

25%

Left pole

Right pole

Scale

Histogram

Quality index

Description of quality symbol

Mean value is below the

quality guideline.

Mean is within the range of

tolerance for the quality
guideline.

Mean value is within the

quality guideline.

1. COURSE CONTENT
1.1)

1.2)

1.3)

1.4)

The course increased my knowledge in the

subject.

The course material was clear.

The textbook(s) enhanced the course.

The assignments contributed to the learning

process.

0%

0%

41.7%

58.3%

0%

8.3%

0%

41.7%

50%

Not at All

0%

0%

0%

36.4%

63.6%

Not at All

0%

8.3%

16.7%

25%

50%

Not at All

04/19/2013

0%

Not at All

Class Climate evaluation

AGREE (entirely)

n=12
av.=4.58
md=5
dev.=0.51

AGREE (entirely)

n=12
av.=4.33
md=4.5
dev.=0.89

AGREE (entirely)

n=11
av.=4.64
md=5
dev.=0.5

AGREE (entirely)

n=12
av.=4.17
md=4.5
dev.=1.03

Page 1

Dr. Christi Sanders, MSMO147 HRMT535A 03/18/13

1.5)

1.6)

1.7)

1.8)

The workload was appropriately distributed

throughout the course.

The course assisted in developing my character.

The course was relevant to my present or future

career.

The content of this course fulfilled each of the

student learning outcomes as identified in the
course syllabus. (If you feel like a required
learning outcome was not adequately addressed
during this course, please provide details in the
appropriate comment box below, so that we can
respond accordingly.)

0%

8.3%

0%

33.3%

58.3%

Not at All

0%

0%

8.3%

41.7%

50%

Not at All

9.1%

0%

9.1%

27.3%

54.5%

Not at All

0%

0%

8.3%

33.3%

58.3%

Not at All

0%

0%

8.3%

41.7%

50%

AGREE (entirely)

n=12
av.=4.42
md=5
dev.=0.9

AGREE (entirely)

n=12
av.=4.42
md=4.5
dev.=0.67

AGREE (entirely)

n=11
av.=4.18
md=5
dev.=1.25

AGREE (entirely)

n=12
av.=4.5
md=5
dev.=0.67

AGREE (entirely)

n=12
av.=4.42
md=4.5
dev.=0.67

AGREE (entirely)

n=12
av.=4.75
md=5
dev.=0.45

AGREE (entirely)

n=12
av.=4.58
md=5
dev.=0.79

AGREE (entirely)

n=12
av.=4.25
md=5
dev.=1.22

AGREE (entirely)

n=12
av.=4.58
md=5
dev.=0.67

AGREE (entirely)

n=12
av.=4.67
md=5
dev.=0.49

AGREE (entirely)

n=12
av.=4
md=4
dev.=1.28

2. INSTRUCTOR
2.1)

2.2)

2.3)

2.4)

2.5)

2.6)

2.7)

The instructor was very knowledgeable about the

subject.

The instructor modeled appropriate morals and

ethics.

The instructor was well-prepared for this course.

The instructor motivated me to learn about the

subject.

The instructor was available to help when I

needed it.

The instructor provided timely feedback on my

work.

The instructor graded my work fairly.

Not at All

0%

0%

0%

25%

75%

Not at All

0%

0%

16.7%

8.3%

75%

Not at All

8.3%

0%

8.3%

25%

58.3%

Not at All

0%

0%

8.3%

25%

66.7%

Not at All

0%

0%

0%

33.3%

66.7%

Not at All

8.3%

8.3%

0%

41.7%

41.7%

Not at All

04/19/2013

Class Climate evaluation

Page 2

Dr. Christi Sanders, MSMO147 HRMT535A 03/18/13

2.8)

2.9)

The instructor treated me like an adult

professional.

Overall I think the instructor did a good job.

0%

0%

9.1%

90.9%

0%

0%

0%

36.4%

63.6%

Not at All

04/19/2013

0%

Not at All

Class Climate evaluation

AGREE (entirely)

n=11
av.=4.91
md=5
dev.=0.3

AGREE (entirely)

n=11
av.=4.64
md=5
dev.=0.5

Page 3

Dr. Christi Sanders, MSMO147 HRMT535A 03/18/13

Profile
Subunit:
Name of the instructor:
Name of the course:
(Name of the survey)

SBL
Dr. Christi Sanders
MSMO147 HRMT535A 03/18/13

Values used in the profile line: Mean

1. COURSE CONTENT

1.1)

1.2)

1.3)

1.4)

1.5)

1.6)

1.7)

1.8)

The course increased my knowledge in the

subject.

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=12

av.=4.58md=5.00dev.=0.51

The course material was clear.

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=12

av.=4.33md=4.50dev.=0.89

The textbook(s) enhanced the course.

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=11

av.=4.64md=5.00dev.=0.50

The assignments contributed to the learning

process.

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=12

av.=4.17md=4.50dev.=1.03

The workload was appropriately distributed

throughout the course.

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=12

av.=4.42md=5.00dev.=0.90

The course assisted in developing my

character.

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=12

av.=4.42md=4.50dev.=0.67

The course was relevant to my present or

future career.

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=11

av.=4.18md=5.00dev.=1.25

The content of this course fulfilled each of the

student learning outcomes as identified in the
course syllabus. (If you feel like a required

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=12

av.=4.50md=5.00dev.=0.67

The instructor was very knowledgeable about

the subject.

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=12

av.=4.42md=4.50dev.=0.67

The instructor modeled appropriate morals and

ethics.

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=12

av.=4.75md=5.00dev.=0.45

The instructor was well-prepared for this

course.

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=12

av.=4.58md=5.00dev.=0.79

The instructor motivated me to learn about the

subject.

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=12

av.=4.25md=5.00dev.=1.22

The instructor was available to help when I

needed it.

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=12

av.=4.58md=5.00dev.=0.67

The instructor provided timely feedback on my

work.

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=12

av.=4.67md=5.00dev.=0.49

The instructor graded my work fairly.

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=12

av.=4.00md=4.00dev.=1.28

The instructor treated me like an adult

professional.

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=11

av.=4.91md=5.00dev.=0.30

Overall I think the instructor did a good job.

Not at All

AGREE
(entirely)

n=11

av.=4.64md=5.00dev.=0.50

2. INSTRUCTOR

2.1)

2.2)

2.3)

2.4)

2.5)

2.6)

2.7)

2.8)

2.9)

04/19/2013

Class Climate evaluation

Page 4

Dr. Christi Sanders, MSMO147 HRMT535A 03/18/13

Profile
Subunit:
Name of the instructor:
Name of the course:
(Name of the survey)

SBL
Dr. Christi Sanders
MSMO147 HRMT535A 03/18/13

1. COURSE CONTENT

2. INSTRUCTOR

04/19/2013

Class Climate evaluation

av.=4.40

dev.=0.80

av.=4.53

dev.=0.71

Page 5

Dr. Christi Sanders, MSMO147 HRMT535A 03/18/13

Comments Report

3. COMMENTS
3.1)

What suggestions do you have to improve the course curriculum?

I lost 60 points of my grade and I really wanted to obtain an A in this class. The instructors should check with IT before giving grades for
assignments to make sure the assignment can be submitted correctly. I work in the evenings and I complete my work at night and on the
weekends. When I need help it is hard to contact someone for help. It would be nice if we had an online instructor for general assignment
question. a chat live chat forum would be an idea. The two assignments that are due on Friday should be broken up to allow graduate
students another day to complete this assignment. One should be due on Saturday to avoid deduction of points. Jane helped me out in IT
for this class. It will not get my grade points back, but this may help the incoming students. I had to concentrate on submitting the major
assignment and I did not have time to submit my responses.
It would be nice to spend more time consetrating on actually creating a performance appraisal form.
Review the syllabus and the course assignments for errors. A couple of the instructions were unclear and needs to be revised.
The continued path of each course having the same projects and assignments is becoming tedious to say the least, specifically the part of
responding to other students assignments.
more exchanges with peers on discussion boards

3.2)

What suggestions do you have for faculty improvement?

Communicate with IWU for assignment requirements and make sure the assignment length can be obtained. An online live chat forum
could help the students to gain information and assistance with the structures of the assignments. Thank you for inserting hyperlinks to the
resource sections of the assignments. I would like the university to use a fourth class grace period for first time graduate students in your
online courses.
NOn. She was very knowledgable in this discipline.
None- Great Job.
Review, edit, and correct the communication errors and grammar errors in the syllabi.
The instructor was very timely with providing feedback and grades. She was encouraging in the discussion postings for clarifications and
prayer requests. Previous instructors were more pro-active or engaging with email correspondence or discussion postings with
assignments on an interpersonal level, but not as timely. It would be great if she could somehow incorporate more personal inter-action
with the class either through the discussion assignments or emails.
instructions to be more clear

04/19/2013

Class Climate evaluation

Page 6