Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
4/15/2015
Memo #4
Bullying behavior ripples through many individuals, systems, and infrastructures. This
behavior is far reaching beyond the physical and emotional trauma; bullying behavior can be
linked to a wide variety of negative outcomes in society. It contributes to the weakening of
families, schools, communities, and neighborhoods and has broad financial and economic
consequences. (Schools, 2015) Public school systems in the United States are designed to
provide free education to students in a protected and structured environment. School systems
must comply with and enforce regulations that protect all individuals within school grounds and
most importantly- provide a positive environment for students to learn in a stable and secure
setting.
There is a wide spectrum of stakeholder groups that are impacted by bullying behavior
within schools. The range goes from the victim all the way to citizen within the community. It is
important to not neglect any stakeholders that could potentially be impacted by a policy
decision. I will start off with the most obvious stakeholder, the group of individuals who are
most impacted both in the short and long term, the victim. These individuals reap the most
damage out of all the other stakeholders. Bullying policies have the potential to significantly
impact this group by how such behavior is identified, prevented, and addressed thereby
effective policies can lessen the damage to these individuals. The next key stakeholder group
are bullies. This group influences how policies are constructed and are evaluated to see how
effective policies are in minimizing bullying behavior.
Other stakeholder groups are comprised of school staff (consisting of health care
workers which is comprised of nurses, psychologists, counselors, and administrative staff which
includes front office and custodial staff), peers, parents and organizations (after school
1
Kulsoom Basharat
4/15/2015
Memo #4
programs, school sports teams) are all connected to the school community and are affected by
bullying activity/behavior. All of these stakeholders must be involved in cooperative efforts in
order to prevent and diminish such behavior in schools. (M. Fekkes, 2005)
Each stakeholder group plays a role in some form in altering or enhancing any policy
that sets out to address bullying behavior in schools. I took into consideration all of the touch
points a student (potential victim) may encounter and how those touch points could help to
enforce a strong stance against bullying behavior.
Below is the complete list of important stakeholders on this issue, their relevancy to
bullying behavior in Fairfax County Public Schools, and the policy implications these groups
would want in an ideal policy. Also based upon how significantly impacted the given group of
stakeholders are, I have categorized the groups into direct and indirect stakeholders.
Stakeholder
VictimsDirect
BulliesDirect
Parents and
Siblings of
VictimDirect
Kulsoom Basharat
4/15/2015
Memo #4
Parents and
Siblings of BullyDirect
Teachers-Direct
School
Counselors/
PsychologistsIndirect
Nurses- Indirect
FCPS
Vice/Principals/
Superintendent Indirect
Kulsoom Basharat
4/15/2015
Memo #4
Virginia School
Board- Indirect
Peers/FriendsDirect
Administrative
Staff (Front
Office, School
Security,
Custodians and
Lunch Room
Staff) - Indirect
FC Police
DepartmentIndirect
After School
Program
(including sports
staff)
Leaders/StaffIndirect
School Bus
Drivers- Indirect
Kulsoom Basharat
4/15/2015
Memo #4
Fairfax County
Public OfficialsIndirect
Fairfax County
Citizens- Indirect
Neighboring
CountiesIndirect
Based on the information above the stakeholders who are directly linked to the issue
are listed below and the impact categories are assessed based on what the stakeholders would
want out of the comprehensive policy 360 degree alternative selected previously. The 360
degree policy consists of training teachers/school staff on how to accurately recognize and
prevent of the onset of bullying behavior and provides classroom curriculum to students in
order to enhance their awareness and skills in identifying, addressing/reporting and resolving
bullying behavior. This 360 degree policy also requires the involvement of the entire school
system as well as involvement from parent/guardian.
Kulsoom Basharat
4/15/2015
Memo #4
Stakeholder
Safe
Environment
(In/Outside of
School)
Mediation/
Counseling
Bullying
Thriving/Prosperous
Prevention/Interventio Lives for Students
n
Awareness/Education
Victims
Bullies
Victims
Parents
/Siblings
Bullys
Parents/
Siblings
Teachers
Peers/
Friends
It is important to include the people who have the greatest interest in the outcome. As
policies are alternated and modified to address needs and change as bullying behavior is seen
through different means as technology and time progresses. Stakeholders have the power to
either eliminate or continue to feed bullying behavior stakeholders must understand the
impact they have on the issue.
Kulsoom Basharat
4/15/2015
Memo #4
Bibliography
Krause, C. (2011, June 27). Bullying. Retrieved from Fairfax Mental Health:
http://www.fairfaxmentalhealth.com/bullying
M. Fekkes, F. P.-V. (2005). Bullying: who does what, when and where? Involvement of children,
teachers, and parents in bullying behavior. Health Education Research Theory and Practice, 8191.
Peter Smith, K. A. (2003). Interventions to Reduce School Bullying. Can J Psychiatry, 591-599.
Rossell, C. H. (1993). Using Multiple Criteria to Evaluate Public Policies- The Case of School
Desegregation. American Politics Quarterly, 155-184.
Schools, F. C. (2015). fcps.org. Retrieved from Bullying Prevention and Intervention: www.fcps.org
Survey, F. C. (2014). Fairfax County Youth Survey Results. Fairfax: Fairfax County.
Virginia, B. o. (2013). Model Policy to Address Bullying in Virginia's Schools.