Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A Brief History
Iraq/Kuwait Conflict
1989
1990
1991
1993
2001
2003
2008
Barak Obama
elected President
2 conflicts to
resolve
2015
James Holmes
Nationality
Date of birth
September 8, 1970
Religion
Muslim
Christian
Education
B.S. in Biochemistry,
M.D., Psychiatrist
B.S. in Neuroscience,
Ph.D. student
Parents
Siblings
2 brothers
1 sister
Shooting location
Date
November 5, 2009
Casualties
13 dead, 42 wounded
Total = 45
12 dead, 70 wounded
Total = 82
Outcome
Defended himself,
received the death
penalty
Location
Casualties
Dead
Wounded
April 2007
Virginia
33
23
April 2009
New York
14
November 2009
Texas
13
42
July 2012
Colorado
12
70
December 2012
Connecticut
27
September 2013
Washington
13
Kantian Ethics
Kant argued that humans should never be treated as a
means to an end. For terrorists that is the opposite of what
they believe. Therefore in this theory terrorism would
definitely be seen as unethical.
Universality acting with a universal law in mind, e.g. do
unto others as you would have them do unto you. In this
instance, terrorism could be seen as ethical.
Respect of persons terrorism would be seen as morally
wrong as it does not respect anyone.
Utilitarianism
Theory focuses on the greatest happiness principle in
producing the best possible outcome for all involved. As
such this can go either or both way depending on which
branch of the theory is used.
E.g. The ANC in South Africa fought against the apartheid
system that was used for many years. In this instance, this
would be seen as ethical
E.g. A random suicide bomber detonating a bomb in a
crowded marketplace. Not so good. No favourable outcome,
therefore unethical.
Act and Rule all is fair in love and war. No rules are being
followed and there is no good outcome.
Virtue Ethics
Terrorism would be seen as absolutely wrong. None of the
parties involved are concerned either with building or
maintaining virtue.
The terrorists main focus is to achieve his goal by any
means necessary, as such morality and virtuosity are not a
priority.
Feminist Ethics
One theory that is not exactly based in hard and fast rules.
As such, terrorism can be seen as either good or bad
depending on the circumstances.
Pro: When there are instances of the little guy fighting back
against those in positions of power, terrorism could be seen
in a positive light. This would be a case of correcting
imbalances and taking into account social realities.
Con: If the terrorist acts seek to advance the same tired
principles that have disenfranchised women and minorities,
then they will be seen as unethical.
Ethics of Care
Ethics of care would see terrorism as morally wrong, as the
tenets of this theory are care and compassion as a pathway
to an ethical system.
There are no instances where there could be shades of grey
because terrorism demands that humanity be put on the
backburner for a more important cause.
No One Love, no Kumbaya! Wrong, wrong, wrong.
In certain instances,
terrorism can support very
noble causes, e.g. the ANC
fight against Apartheid in
South Africa
Kantian or Utilitarian?
Speak up
Thoughts?
1. Why is the word terrorism used when anyone but first world governments
fight for their cause?
2. Is it because we have been secure for so long we just accepted that as
the way things are supposed to be?
3. How would you react if Canada was attacked in the way that Iraq or
Afghanistan has? Would you be able to rationalize it? Would you want to
do something about it?
4. Is it ever ok to judge an entire group based on the actions of a few? Is
Christianity exempt from that rule?
References
https://
www.academia.edu/2374630/An_Assessment_on_the_R
ole_Of_International_Terrorism_In_International
_Relations
Cahn, Steven M.Exploring Ethics: An Introductory
Anthology. New York: Oxford UP, 2009. Print.