Sunteți pe pagina 1din 3

Timeline:

11/22 (Sunday) -- questions created by Claire


11/30 (Monday) -- 8:00 pm- everyone finishes individual answers to questions
12/1 (Tuesday) -- 8:00 pm - Claire compiles a script and everyone reads through script and
provides feedback
12/2 (Wednesday) -- group script editing
12/4 (Friday) -- record script
Schedule for December 4th meeting
10:30-11:30 -- Meet in Ode Team Room 131A for final edits
11:30-12:30 -- Go to Media Studio and finish recording parts for podcast
12/6 (Sunday) -- Emily finishes editing audio of both short and full-length podcasts
12/7 (Monday) -- listen to podcast and provide feedback
12/9 (Wednesday) -- class presentation everyone has introductory remarks prepared

Different Ways of Knowing:


- imitation(nmesis)
-writing as a form of coming to knowledge vs expressing knowledge
- reading/highlighting (foucault)(outlining )
-putting pieces in conversation with each other (comparing with others)
-inference from broad range documents/artifacts
-interviewing
-connection (to historical past)
-art to convey knowledge
-fieldwork/first eye witness (hands-on fieldwork)
-writing fiction

forms of media
-podcast-> interview
1. interviewer, 4 other people ways of knowledge and they talk about all of these
methods and gain from knowledge (scripts on google doc)
- 4 perspectives of truth
- how many words/ minute(4-5 minutes per person)
- 10 questions, have each person write separate and then make it seem
conversational afterwards
central question :
how do we find the best path to knowledge?
Roles:
Interviewer- Claire
Neoromantic: Petra

Scientific Rationale: Nikki


Social Traditional: Melanie
postmodern constructivist (all postmodern but focused on constructivist) : Emily
Questions:
1. What is your opinion on the imitation of a work?
a. Does it help one absorb information?
b. What can it teach us about the original?
c. Is it possible to imitate without losing ones own voice?
2. What are the pros and cons of using art to convey scientific knowledge?
a. does it sell the science short by cutting out information?
3. How does writing help us process information?
a. is it an efficient way to learn?
b. in what situations is it useful? in which is it not?
4. When you are faced with difficult reading material, how do you tackle it?
a. Do any of you use an outline?
b. Other ways to absorb it?
5. Is inference from historically distant documents a fair or accurate way to gain
information about a culture?
a. if we can never truly know, is guessing worth it?
b. can we attempt to compare what we think we know about
historical societies to our own?
6. In closing, what tips do you have for conducting an interview?
a. what are different ways to approach a sensitive question?
b. how do you keep the flow of an interview going?
Responses for Interview Questions:
Scientific Rational:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QNFfxuQo6k8XR0PUObSiHygFEME2rLp7VouUPGfjoFQ
/edit?usp=sharing
Neo-romantic:
https://docs.google.com/a/uw.edu/document/d/1lyPzwKWdwNcju_qutVgzBXZEu14J9wHzbCjzG
jkDznc/edit?usp=sharing
Social Traditional:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1F4KO5CDN5RMWh5uM5QZtlhBasCNCu9YtB_lxsh6A1A/edit?usp=sharing
PostModern:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MbsAn2ihjESDGf6U4QSxmnms5KvwdYgGNcsou2KKHG
w/edit?usp=sharing

First Draft of Script:


https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jHJ0Di5DuMwfKFKE0A3ZosagLHXfDuzLVl5DKAKf_ug/e
dit?usp=sharing
Final Script:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BvGm9b0E-GpjVsZPVkklpB9JCVhFkF1Zqeh6Ud08IU/edit?usp=sharing
Ten minute script:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Yv8mDbnrtmrSPPnnL5U92PMsAQnMxLtDoHzZ_g6xTc/edit?usp=sharing
Pre-presentation spiel
Explain process of thinking for our project
Why we're doing worldviews - Emily
Coming up with questions - Clair
What it was like answering questions - Petra, Nikki, Melanie, Emily
(in some order like that)

S-ar putea să vă placă și