Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Faculty of Engineering
2015
Section: C5
Introduction to Engineering Design-1 (IE201)
Assignment L-4
(Team Process Checks)
Team 1 (Elite)
1)
Allah Mohammad Ibrahimi
(1414316)
2)
Ghassan Mohammed
(1414800)
3)
Sefatullah Omar Khan
(1414314)
4)
Ammar Ali Al-Ammari
(1414555)
5)
Hani Mubarak Alghamdi
(1409833)
6)
Anas Ali Aumara
(1406960)
Instructor Name
Dr Ghaffer kiani
Team Email
Elite_team1@hotmail.com
Team: 1
Date: 3/November/15
Section: C5
Assignment: L4-1
Abstract
The whole assignment is about team processing check, which is
divided into three steps. Firstly, finding the result of team performance
checking by every member of the team. Each of us checked and
evaluated the team by our own opinion and ideas and made a list of
five strength and two weak areas. Secondly, every member evaluated
by each other. Identified the strength areas and the areas that to be
improved. At the end each member discussed about the same person
that they evaluated him. The same team members made the items of
the process checks. The items were selected according to their
importance to us. The process checks are presented as follows:
consensus team process check, team members process checks, and
team members individual process checks. These process checks
helped us to improve our team every now and then, because it
addresses the issues that the team suffers from the point of view of
each member.
Work
To begin with, we conducted a long meeting on the 23 nd of
October 2015 in a caf in order to finish all the requirements of L-4 and
distribute the work equally. We began the meeting by making the
leader discuss the requirements of the assignment and ask him
questions about the unclear points of the assignments. Second, we
began rating each member individually by voting on each point and
taking the average of the votes and then rounding it to the nearest
whole number. In this step, we also discussed the areas of strength of
each team member and took the best three or four points. We also
discussed the areas to be improved and took the best two points. We
1 | Page
M1
M2
M3
M4
M5
M6
Total
Avera
ge
4
5
5
4
4
4
5
5
3
4
5
4
5
5
4
4
5
4
5
5
5
5
3
4
5
5
4
5
5
4
5
5
5
4
5
5
3
5
5
3
4
4
3
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
4
3
4
3
5
4
4
5
5
5
5
4
4
5
4
3
4
4
5
4
5
5
5
5
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
25
27
30
27
27
25
28
28
21
23
27
23
28
27
4.16
4.5
5
4.5
4.5
4.16
4.6
4.6
3.5
3.8
4.5
3.8
4.6
4.5
Final
Rati
ng
4
5
5
5
5
4
5
5
4
4
5
4
5
5
Strongly agree
disagree
Strongly
1
2 | Page
Strongly agree
disagree
7. Everyone is contributing.
Strongly
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 | Page
had to rate and discusses the points he rated, the areas of strength
and the areas that must be improved.
Strongly agree
disagree
Strongly
1
2. The team values everyones contributions.
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
7. Everyone is contributing.
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
Discussion
After evaluation of team process check I found out that our team
is strong and creative. We have good combination of intelligent and
confident students. Every member sets same goal for the course
because everyone works hard to product a good project in the course.
Every member in the group helps each other if someone is in trouble.
There is a good understanding between our teammates that made us
we are comfortable with each other. We have lots of strength points
like team management, discipline, hard working, being optimist and
etc. Also, here are few points that our team should improve like being
unprepared and English level. Most of our teammates come without
they know the agenda of everyday work that its make some problems
in the class, also the English level of our teammates is little bit weak,
therefore we have little bit problems in our assignments, but the in the
future we will work harder to improve these points.
6 | Page
Strongly agree
disagree
7. Everyone is contributing.
Strongly
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Strongly agree
disagree
7. Everyone is contributing.
Strongly
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 | Page
Name:
Strongly agree
disagree
Strongly
1
11.We teach and learn from each other.
1
1
1
1
Strongly agree
disagree
Strongly
1
1
10 | P a g e
Name:
each other.
4. We stay on track when we are together.
Strongly agree
disagree
Strongly
1
5
7. Everyone is contributing.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Strongly agree
disagree
7. Everyone is contributing.
Strongly
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Discussion
Fortunately, the relationship between our team members is very
close and strong. We are very serious about this course and about the
team work. By dividing the given tasks equally and make sour that
everyone is participating. Each of us works too hard even more than is
required from him. The team members are very ambitious, by have a
common goal which is, finishing this course with submitting a final
professional project and get the highest grads among the student. That
what will happen if we continue cooperating together in the work.
However, we have two weak areas that we hope to be improved during
this course, make sure to attend the classes on time and avoid side
conversations wither in the class or during the meeting.
Strongly agree
disagree
7. Everyone is contributing.
Strongly
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
13 | P a g e
Name:
Strongly agree
disagree
Strongly
1
14.Our leadership is good.
Strongly agree
disagree
17.Explain confidently.
Strongly
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
Strongly agree
disagree
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
Strongly
3
1
3
17 | P a g e
Strongly agree
disagree
2
6. Resolves conflicts constructively.
17.Explain confidently.
Strongly
1
4
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
18 | P a g e
19 | P a g e
Strongly agree
disagree
17.Explain confidently.
Strongly
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
20 | P a g e
Strongly agree
disagree
Strongly
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
21 | P a g e
Strongly agree
disagree
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
Strongly
3
1
3
22 | P a g e
Strongly agree
disagree
2
29.Allows only one person to speak at a time.
37.Explain confidently.
Strongly
1
4
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
Strongly agree
disagree
17.Explain confidently.
Strongly
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
26 | P a g e
Strongly agree
disagree
Strongly
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
1
4
3
3
1
27 | P a g e
Strongly agree
disagree
17.Explain confidently.
Strongly
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
4
2
3
1
Discussion
Annas is just evaluated, he is the man of vision. He has more
strength areas than weak areas. He has just few weak areas that will
be improved by himself and by the assist of team members. Here some
strength areas will be taken as an illustration, for instance; he is hard
worker, means he works cooperatively, submit assignment by deadline
and resolve conflict constructively. He is good communicator, means
he lets everyone to speak in his turn, pays attention to ideas, well
manner and respects members. When task is given he resolves it by
time and the surprising news is that he solves every issue by himself
no matter how difficult is. On the other hand he has some weak points
which will be improved like, speaking except English in the group and
being on time.
Conclusion
28 | P a g e
29 | P a g e