0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
19 vizualizări1 pagină
APPLICATION OF A STRUCTURED AND AN UNSTRUCTURED CFDMETHOD
TO THE FUSELAGE AERODYNAMICS OF THE EC145
HELICOPTER. PREDICTION OF THE TIME AVERAGED
INFLUENCE OF THE MAIN ROTOR.
Alessandro D´Alascio*, Klausdieter Pahlke✷ and Frederic Le Chuiton✷
*EUROCOPTER DEUTSCHLAND, Ottobrunn, Deutschland
e-mail: alessandro.dalascio@eurocopter.com,
✷ DLR, Braunschweig, Deutschland
e-mail: Klausdieter.Pahlke@dlr.de
e-mail: Frederic.Lechuiton@dlr.de
Key words: EC145, CFD, aerodynamics, FLOWer, TAU, Actuator Disk.
Abstract. The first part of the paper presents a comparison between CFD results and wind
tunnel measurements on the isolated fuselage of the EC145 helicopter in level flight
conditions at medium flight speed. Two RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes) codes have
been used for this analysis: the multiblock structured code FLOWer and the uAPPLICATION OF A STRUCTURED AND AN UNSTRUCTURED CFDMETHOD
TO THE FUSELAGE AERODYNAMICS OF THE EC145
HELICOPTER. PREDICTION OF THE TIME AVERAGED
INFLUENCE OF THE MAIN ROTOR.
Alessandro D´Alascio*, Klausdieter Pahlke✷ and Frederic Le Chuiton✷
*EUROCOPTER DEUTSCHLAND, Ottobrunn, Deutschland
e-mail: alessandro.dalascio@eurocopter.com,
✷ DLR, Braunschweig, Deutschland
e-mail: Klausdieter.Pahlke@dlr.de
e-mail: Frederic.Lechuiton@dlr.de
Key words: EC145, CFD, aerodynamics, FLOWer, TAU, Actuator Disk.
Abstract. The first part of the paper presents a comparison between CFD results and wind
tunnel measurements on the isolated fuselage of the EC145 helicopter in level flight
conditions at medium flight speed. Two RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes) codes have
been used for this analysis: the multiblock structured code FLOWer and the unstructured
code TAU. The second part of the paper shows the effect on local and global flow quantities
of the Actuator Disk (AD) boundary condition implemented in the FLOWer code. For this
purpose isolated fuselage results about the EC145 in high speed forward flight have been
compared with the corresponding results on a fuselage plus AD configuration.
Alessandro D`Alascio, Klausdieter Pahlke and Frederic Le Chuiton
2
Nomenclature
CX - drag coefficient /(1/ 2 ) D v 2S ∞ ∞ = ρ
Z C - lift coefficient L /(1/ 2 v 2S) ∞ ∞ = ρ
D - drag
L - lift
∞ M - free stream Mach number
Re - Reynolds number = ρvstructured
code TAU. The second part of the paper shows the effect on local and global flow quantities
of the Actuator Disk (AD) boundary condition implemented in the FLOWer code. For this
purpose isolated fuselage results about the EC145 in high speed forward flight have been
compared with the corresponding results on a fuselage plus AD configuration.
Alessandro D`Alascio, Klausdieter Pahlke and Frederic Le Chuiton
2
Nomenclature
CX - drag coefficient /(1/ 2 ) D v 2S ∞ ∞ = ρ
Z C - lift coefficient L /(1/ 2 v 2S) ∞ ∞ = ρ
D - drag
L - lift
∞ M - free stream Mach number
Re - Reynolds number = ρv
Titlu original
Application of a Structured and an Unstructured Cfdmethod
APPLICATION OF A STRUCTURED AND AN UNSTRUCTURED CFDMETHOD
TO THE FUSELAGE AERODYNAMICS OF THE EC145
HELICOPTER. PREDICTION OF THE TIME AVERAGED
INFLUENCE OF THE MAIN ROTOR.
Alessandro D´Alascio*, Klausdieter Pahlke✷ and Frederic Le Chuiton✷
*EUROCOPTER DEUTSCHLAND, Ottobrunn, Deutschland
e-mail: alessandro.dalascio@eurocopter.com,
✷ DLR, Braunschweig, Deutschland
e-mail: Klausdieter.Pahlke@dlr.de
e-mail: Frederic.Lechuiton@dlr.de
Key words: EC145, CFD, aerodynamics, FLOWer, TAU, Actuator Disk.
Abstract. The first part of the paper presents a comparison between CFD results and wind
tunnel measurements on the isolated fuselage of the EC145 helicopter in level flight
conditions at medium flight speed. Two RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes) codes have
been used for this analysis: the multiblock structured code FLOWer and the uAPPLICATION OF A STRUCTURED AND AN UNSTRUCTURED CFDMETHOD
TO THE FUSELAGE AERODYNAMICS OF THE EC145
HELICOPTER. PREDICTION OF THE TIME AVERAGED
INFLUENCE OF THE MAIN ROTOR.
Alessandro D´Alascio*, Klausdieter Pahlke✷ and Frederic Le Chuiton✷
*EUROCOPTER DEUTSCHLAND, Ottobrunn, Deutschland
e-mail: alessandro.dalascio@eurocopter.com,
✷ DLR, Braunschweig, Deutschland
e-mail: Klausdieter.Pahlke@dlr.de
e-mail: Frederic.Lechuiton@dlr.de
Key words: EC145, CFD, aerodynamics, FLOWer, TAU, Actuator Disk.
Abstract. The first part of the paper presents a comparison between CFD results and wind
tunnel measurements on the isolated fuselage of the EC145 helicopter in level flight
conditions at medium flight speed. Two RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes) codes have
been used for this analysis: the multiblock structured code FLOWer and the unstructured
code TAU. The second part of the paper shows the effect on local and global flow quantities
of the Actuator Disk (AD) boundary condition implemented in the FLOWer code. For this
purpose isolated fuselage results about the EC145 in high speed forward flight have been
compared with the corresponding results on a fuselage plus AD configuration.
Alessandro D`Alascio, Klausdieter Pahlke and Frederic Le Chuiton
2
Nomenclature
CX - drag coefficient /(1/ 2 ) D v 2S ∞ ∞ = ρ
Z C - lift coefficient L /(1/ 2 v 2S) ∞ ∞ = ρ
D - drag
L - lift
∞ M - free stream Mach number
Re - Reynolds number = ρvstructured
code TAU. The second part of the paper shows the effect on local and global flow quantities
of the Actuator Disk (AD) boundary condition implemented in the FLOWer code. For this
purpose isolated fuselage results about the EC145 in high speed forward flight have been
compared with the corresponding results on a fuselage plus AD configuration.
Alessandro D`Alascio, Klausdieter Pahlke and Frederic Le Chuiton
2
Nomenclature
CX - drag coefficient /(1/ 2 ) D v 2S ∞ ∞ = ρ
Z C - lift coefficient L /(1/ 2 v 2S) ∞ ∞ = ρ
D - drag
L - lift
∞ M - free stream Mach number
Re - Reynolds number = ρv
APPLICATION OF A STRUCTURED AND AN UNSTRUCTURED CFDMETHOD
TO THE FUSELAGE AERODYNAMICS OF THE EC145
HELICOPTER. PREDICTION OF THE TIME AVERAGED
INFLUENCE OF THE MAIN ROTOR.
Alessandro D´Alascio*, Klausdieter Pahlke✷ and Frederic Le Chuiton✷
*EUROCOPTER DEUTSCHLAND, Ottobrunn, Deutschland
e-mail: alessandro.dalascio@eurocopter.com,
✷ DLR, Braunschweig, Deutschland
e-mail: Klausdieter.Pahlke@dlr.de
e-mail: Frederic.Lechuiton@dlr.de
Key words: EC145, CFD, aerodynamics, FLOWer, TAU, Actuator Disk.
Abstract. The first part of the paper presents a comparison between CFD results and wind
tunnel measurements on the isolated fuselage of the EC145 helicopter in level flight
conditions at medium flight speed. Two RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes) codes have
been used for this analysis: the multiblock structured code FLOWer and the uAPPLICATION OF A STRUCTURED AND AN UNSTRUCTURED CFDMETHOD
TO THE FUSELAGE AERODYNAMICS OF THE EC145
HELICOPTER. PREDICTION OF THE TIME AVERAGED
INFLUENCE OF THE MAIN ROTOR.
Alessandro D´Alascio*, Klausdieter Pahlke✷ and Frederic Le Chuiton✷
*EUROCOPTER DEUTSCHLAND, Ottobrunn, Deutschland
e-mail: alessandro.dalascio@eurocopter.com,
✷ DLR, Braunschweig, Deutschland
e-mail: Klausdieter.Pahlke@dlr.de
e-mail: Frederic.Lechuiton@dlr.de
Key words: EC145, CFD, aerodynamics, FLOWer, TAU, Actuator Disk.
Abstract. The first part of the paper presents a comparison between CFD results and wind
tunnel measurements on the isolated fuselage of the EC145 helicopter in level flight
conditions at medium flight speed. Two RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes) codes have
been used for this analysis: the multiblock structured code FLOWer and the unstructured
code TAU. The second part of the paper shows the effect on local and global flow quantities
of the Actuator Disk (AD) boundary condition implemented in the FLOWer code. For this
purpose isolated fuselage results about the EC145 in high speed forward flight have been
compared with the corresponding results on a fuselage plus AD configuration.
Alessandro D`Alascio, Klausdieter Pahlke and Frederic Le Chuiton
2
Nomenclature
CX - drag coefficient /(1/ 2 ) D v 2S ∞ ∞ = ρ
Z C - lift coefficient L /(1/ 2 v 2S) ∞ ∞ = ρ
D - drag
L - lift
∞ M - free stream Mach number
Re - Reynolds number = ρvstructured
code TAU. The second part of the paper shows the effect on local and global flow quantities
of the Actuator Disk (AD) boundary condition implemented in the FLOWer code. For this
purpose isolated fuselage results about the EC145 in high speed forward flight have been
compared with the corresponding results on a fuselage plus AD configuration.
Alessandro D`Alascio, Klausdieter Pahlke and Frederic Le Chuiton
2
Nomenclature
CX - drag coefficient /(1/ 2 ) D v 2S ∞ ∞ = ρ
Z C - lift coefficient L /(1/ 2 v 2S) ∞ ∞ = ρ
D - drag
L - lift
∞ M - free stream Mach number
Re - Reynolds number = ρv
APPLICATION OF A STRUCTURED AND AN UNSTRUCTURED CFDMETHOD
TO THE FUSELAGE AERODYNAMICS OF THE EC145
HELICOPTER. PREDICTION OF THE TIME AVERAGED INFLUENCE OF THE MAIN ROTOR. Alessandro DAlascio*, Klausdieter Pahlke and Frederic Le Chuiton *EUROCOPTER DEUTSCHLAND, Ottobrunn, Deutschland e-mail: alessandro.dalascio@eurocopter.com, DLR, Braunschweig, Deutschland e-mail: Klausdieter.Pahlke@dlr.de e-mail: Frederic.Lechuiton@dlr.de Key words: EC145, CFD, aerodynamics, FLOWer, TAU, Actuator Disk. Abstract. The first part of the paper presents a comparison between CFD results and wind tunnel measurements on the isolated fuselage of the EC145 helicopter in level flight conditions at medium flight speed. Two RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes) codes have been used for this analysis: the multiblock structured code FLOWer and the unstructured code TAU. The second part of the paper shows the effect on local and global flow quantities of the Actuator Disk (AD) boundary condition implemented in the FLOWer code. For this purpose isolated fuselage results about the EC145 in high speed forward flight have been compared with the corresponding results on a fuselage plus AD configuration. Alessandro D`Alascio, Klausdieter Pahlke and Frederic Le Chuiton 2 Nomenclature CX - drag coefficient /(1/ 2 ) D v 2S = Z C - lift coefficient L /(1/ 2 v 2S) = D - drag L - lift M - free stream Mach number Re - Reynolds number = v
What Are tWhat Are the Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid DifferentWhat Are the Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid DifferentWhat Are the Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid DifferentWhat Are the Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid DifferentheWhat Are the Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid DifferentWhat Are the Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid DifferentWhat Are the Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid DifferentWhat Are the Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid Different Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid Different
What Are tWhat Are the Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid DifferentWhat Are the Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid DifferentWhat Are the Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid DifferentWhat Are the Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid DifferentheWhat Are the Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid DifferentWhat Are the Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid DifferentWhat Are the Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid DifferentWhat Are the Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid Different Characteristics That Keep Solid and Fluid Different