Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CRL 4
students pedagogy because they do not acknowledge their past as often as they should. Many
teachers and authors do this to help them write better work but when students are prevented from
doing so because it is too easy, it can be harmful tot heir learning. Instead, teachers should put
aside their feelings about how hard assignments should be and instead try to have constructive
assignments that help students.
Quotations
As Steedman makes clear and as I argue further below, telling stories of the past does not limit
one to simply telling what happened. Telling stories of the past involves selection and
interpretation. The choice to tell a story of the past is a rhetorical one (page 7).
The author makes that argument that people can tell stories in order to constructively give
themselves better tools in confronting the future. Talking about the past does not necessarily have
to be a burden.
We have to pay attention to the present-time effects of the stories we tell about our past (page
12).
Robillard argues that certain stories can be selectively pulled from our past in order to help give
us a guidance. In addition, telling stories about the past can help construct good ethics based on
what we believe is the right thing to do that can help us in the future.
As a writing teacher, I want to put out a call for a more complex pedagogy of narrative (page
19).
Robillarddoesnotargueforteacherstojuststartaskingforreflectionsfromstudent.
Instead,hearguesthatteachersshouldseethebenefitsofstudentswritingabouttheirpast
andunderstandhowitcanhelpthemgrowandmanifestintheirquestforknowledge.