Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
2
Abstract
achievements, frustrations, questions, concerns, and next steps involved with my PDQP eportfolio.
3
PDQP Progress Report
The goals of this course were to select quality artifacts that demonstrate my competency
in each domain of the California Teacher Performance Expectations (2013). I hold a Bachelor
of Fine Arts in Photography from California College of the Arts, therefore I am thankful that I
naturally photographed my students work and my art classroom procedures over the last few
years. It was much easier to find visual examples to populate each domain, especially Domain
A: Making Subject Matter Comprehensible to Students and Domain B: Assessing Student
Learning. Although since the photographs of student work can easily be included to satisfy each
domain, I found that selecting precise examples for each TPE was a bit of a challenge. Over the
last few weeks as I became more competent of the expectations for building my PDQP I often
switched artifacts between different domains until I was happy with the results.
The frustrations I experienced involved the Literature Review component of the
assignments. With no disrespect to the courses team of professors who wrote the course outline,
I just think the expectation was not very clear, as indicated from other students agreeing with my
post about this frustration in Week 3s Discussion Board. Luckily, I am finally grasping what
exactly a Literature Review entailed. I was previously under the impression that the Literature
Reviews were supposed to be write-ups on actual books or articles that supported the
expectations of each domain, rather than a personal reflection of the artifacts chosen for my eportfolio. I had previously written in justifications for each of my artifacts in my Weebly eportfolio instead of writing them as an APA formatted paper. Even though I need to go back and
complete all of the Literature Reviews correctly, at least now I have a better understanding of
what the course was asking for.
I do not have many questions or concerns about the PDQP experience. I am very fond of
the work I have created and the opportunity to have such a great resource to support my growth
as a teacher. In reflection, I do need to keep a permission slip form with me as I photograph
students and their work. I eliminated most pictures of my students on my PDQP because I only
have permission from my school site to use their photographs. Each student completes a photorelease form as they are admitted to our school, but I would like to create a secondary form that
is catered to their parents so that students and their families are more aware that their childrens
pictures are in existence on the Internet. I found that the text Developing a Professional
Teaching Portfolio (Constantino, 2009) was instrumental to the awareness and preparation of
such a task and I am thankful to have read this resource to gain more insight on the professional
obligations of teachers.
My next steps will be to follow my 5-year professional development plan that I outlined
for Domain F: Developing as a Professional Educator. As I complete each goal of my PD plan I
hope to continue adding artifacts that are evident of each steps completion into my PDQP eportfolio. I will also have to remember that less is more in terms of populating artifacts into my
PDQP. Choosing quality over quantity will demonstrate that my PDQP is a reflection of my
character as a teacher: organized, creative, professional, competent and experienced.
5
References
California Teaching Performance Expectations. (2013). Retrieved January 24, 2016, from
http://www.ctc.ca.gov/educator-prep/TPA-files/TPEs-Full-Version.pdf
Constantino, P. M; De Lorenzo, M. N. (2009) Developing a professional teaching portfolio (3rd
ed.) Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ