KLdirecttv2@gmail.

com

preface
This document has been updated 10/31/2015
This is only my opinion as only God can know the Truth
This is an attempt to distill the basics and essential concepts of the Karl Lentz Method. It was
gathered mainly from the youtube video series, thanks to Craig Lynch who has so kindly
edited down for us all, from the original Karl Lentz talkshoe episodes. Thank you Karl
Lentz!!
Craig Lynchs Youtube Channel-https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDd9cJ5qa3rx2grmZMqGfjQ
fsectio
And thanks to all who added to this document in any shape or form
Man created Government to secure and protect your rights and property from man. The
problem isnt that governzzment is filled with man but rather the problem lies in that man
has forgeten he is the creator of it..
Lets begin the journey of understandingThere seems to be two camps of thoughts that
are out there in societyYou either are pro government or you are against itThis seems to
be a polarized situationI believe neither is correctFor the government lovers I would say
how dare you not recognize how much harm is being done at arms length with the aid and
use of governmentAs for the other camp Why did you just scream and shout in protest as
this is just like saying because I dont know the rules of the game I will just sit here and pout
and spout my angst
To first get past both mindsets one has to take a closer look at how to play this game..In
most case this is the first look at how the system really works for man not against him.
Most people have a typical view of just going to court and plead to a judge and hope justice
will prevail.. Nothing further from the truth is going to happen.Did you show up with a
lawyer? Did you show up say youre the defendant? Did you answer to your name? Did you
accept the title of Mr. or Mrs? all these things little things just gave control over to a legal
world inadvertentily accepting duties and obligations for all your god giving
rights.confused? we were too lets get educated about protecting our rights as a man by
becoming a fully realized man..
First thing one has to grasp is that there are basically two types of courts: Administrative or
common law courts. One court is for legal persons, the latter is for man. The greatest hurdle
is getting past your belief that when you are at traffic court, you are not in a normal court.

1 | Page

What is a person? Person can be a legal person (citizen) or man. Where did this legal person
come from..It was created the day you were born. You were contracted over not with , by
your parents, on that day with the government to register you for benefits. I use the word
over because you were not capable of contract yourself with the government making the
birthcertificate hold over your life non existant because this is not a legally or lawfully
binding contract as you truly were not a competent party with full disclosure to all the
particulars because you were just a baby. But just as your birthday is really hearsay from
your parents because you were just a baby, you trust that the birthday is really true and also
that the birthcertificate document only ensure you have a right to the land.
Although man is a person one must be clear about what kind of person. Man has duties and
obligations to a society of mankind, whose members may impose upon them for failures to
comply or perform.
Similarly but differently a legal person such as a lawyer or a police officer is a legal person
and they have duties and obligations to their legal society. This type of person has limited
rights (bill of rights or charter of rights and freedom).
Note: a police officer is only a police officer when he is working.. when he is done his shift,
he instantly regains all his rights as a man.
Typically Canadians believe they get their rights from the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Well if that is true where do your rights go when you run into problems in the USA because
as a Canadian, one cant file a us civil rights complaint, because we are not a United States
citizen? (more on that later)
What is a man? Man has the god given right to do anything he wants but he too also has
duties and obligations to help his fellow man to not harm his fellow man, in this JudeoChristian society.
Man is unlimited in that he can paint a picture and can go fishing, so long as he doesnt
trespass or harm another man; a police officer person can't do that because his title only
allows him to perform his duties and obligations, he is unauthorized to do anything outside
his duties and obligations.
Simply answering to your name the wrong way in court will position you as a legal person
and send you into the limited rights legal world, giving them control over your body and your
life. Karl has shown us a way out of their jurisdiction hence control.
Judeo-Christian society you ask? Isnt there separation between church and state? Nope.
Canada and most common wealth nations are under the supremacy of God, with the Holy
Bible as the foundation of their laws. A clear hint is the title of MINISTRY OF DEFENCE!
Ministry? Minister? Can anyone see those religious titles!! This approach is not for a
Napoleonic code land like France or Spain (civil law), nor would this work in Saudi Arabia, as
their foundation of law is the Koran, not the Holy Bible...
The Karl Lentz method is basically to speak as a man, and only to another man... It is
sometimes hard to do this when the other man is clothed/cloaked as a judge person or
police officer person... the Karl method will show you how to flush out the man from the
person so u can hold them accountablecourteously.

2 | Page

One of my presumptions is that the legal world (bar association) has been presuming us for
one of their members (a legal person), and applying statutes and codes on us who,
unbeknownst to ourselves, we have been accepting a legal obligation that was unnecessary
and unbeneficial to us..... But when man does not know himself or his rights, he is often
taken for the legal ride of his life...
Im saying that basically we're being taken advantage of, because we do not understand the
system but once we get a grasp of it then we will be able to empower ourselves by removing
our presumptions and replacing them with facts that we can stand on and move forward
through this court system.
Everybodys lawful problems are the generally the same but their suit and cases are
absolutely unique in the makeup of the parties and circumstances
Hopefully this book will help you to understand government as well help you mend and grow
to love government and its employees down to the police man, more than u ever have
before but this will take a next level understanding of the world we live in, in the year
2015.
This document should be printed out and used as study material. When in court and need to
consult this document, load it on digital device, require leave of court, search this document
for answers with Ctrl+F. Please know everything in the doc beforehand, it should only offer
support, not be the real-time defense.

With that said.Lets get drunk on double distilled Karl Lentz

Section 1 -Fundamentals(person expanded) 24pgs

The constitution of Canada and USA were created not only to not simply to empower
government but more importantly to constrain it.

Government was created to secure and protect your rights and property.. With that being
said Government is an awesome ideal on paper.. If you hold on to your seats and give me
some of your time, in this document i will explain how i can say that Government can do no
wrong! And have u believe it too!

Now, where in the governments constitution does it allow for doing wrong to a man. You
wont be able to find it!! So government cant do anything wrong to a man. But a man acting

3 | Page

as a government agent cant operate outside of the scope of their duties and obligations and
harm you What i mean by that mouthful is that is, if a police officer comes into your home
commits robbery, we know they arent allowed to do this as there is no law permiting this
then what do we do? What is our recourse or remedy?
U cant sue a 2D legal fiction called a police officer, who is only there to secure and protect
your rights and property, so again what is our remedy?

What u must realize is that it wasnt the police officer who took your property, it was a man
or woman acting as a police officer who did u wrong because again the police officer is just a
title that does no wrong
If a government agent/police officer are trespassing u just have to let them know!!!
Government would rather ask for forgiveness than to not over stepit is their nature.. so we
must simply remind them when they are trespassing!!!
So never go after a police officer (which is just a 2 dimensionally created entity on paper for
your benefit) but rather the man who sometimes acts as a police officer you must be able
to see the difference between those two entities and what they are allowed and not allowed
to do. If you dont know the rules of the game they are going to take adavantage of you ,
both legally and lawfully.

They are public servants and are you not the public?

All a police officer is going to do is wirte a compliantas a man you dont answer complaints
u only have to answer to claims! Hence where is the man who says i do wrong!!

Government was created by man to protect our rights and property not from an alien
invasion but rather to protect us from other men and womenGovernment is a what, not
a who. A who can lie, harm, trespass; a what is general description who is specific.

If you live in a common wealth country consider yourself very lucky to be able to defend
your unalienable rights because you cant do this is in France or Spain as they are Napolionic
(Civil law) country as I mentioned earlier. Below is a world map of how few countries that still
recognize the Common Law.

4 | Page

Lets now take a close look at Queen Elizabeth II (Elizabeth Alexandra Mary; born 21 April
1926[a]) is, and has been from her accession in 1952, Queen of the United

5 | Page

Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, and Head of the Commonwealth.

The Queen takes Coronation OathPhoto: PA/PA Archive/Press Association Images

Then Archbishop of Canterbury Dr. Geoffrey Fisher presided over the Coronation ceremony.
These are the words of the Coronation Oath in full.
Archbishop of Canterbury: Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath?
Queen Elizabeth II: I am willing.
Archbishop of Canterbury: Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of
the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand,
the Union of South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other
Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and
customs?
Queen Elizabeth II: I solemnly promise so to do.
Archbishop of Canterbury: Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be
executed in all your judgements?
Queen Elizabeth II: I will.
Archbishop of Canterbury: Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God
and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the
United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law? Will you maintain and
preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship,
discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England? And will you preserve
unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their
charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of
them?
Queen Elizabeth II: All this I promise to do.

6 | Page

The Queen then moved from the Coronation chair to the altar of Westminster and, kneeling,
with her right hand on a bible, said:
The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God.

Queen Elizabeth II stands as our protector of this common wealth.. read her coriantion as
she specifically mentions topromise and swear to govern the Peoples .....according to their
respective laws and customs and this is a common law land why is this common law land
so important...because you right to face your accuser is one of the key principles of the Karl
Lentz method..it will be a tool you will use in many different ways form letters to prosecutors
or even a court room setting, to exercize your rights and to help call out a frivolous
complaint made by a Lawyer/prosecutor.. but we will learn more about that later
My government is i because i am self-governing!! We live in a nation where we can self
govern. The queen is also protecting this right by law and custom.and what is customary
to this landwell we need not look any further than the customs of the native American
population who does self governthis is the Natives belief and anyone else on this land who
chose it too.

The Native American people claim an inherent right to self-government either because it is
seen as a natural right emanating from prior occupation of the land or because of
a gift or covenant with the Creator. In this case the Native people do not seek to be
granted self-government, but simply to have their pre-existing right recognized in law.

7 | Page

A monument in Jamestown presented by the Virginia State Bar states: THE COMMON LAW.
Here the common law of England was established on this continent with the arrival of the
first settlers on May 14, 1607. The first charter granted that the inhabitants of the colony
shall have and enjoy all liberties, franchises and immunitiesas if they had been abiding
and borne within this our realme of Englande Since Magna Carta the common law has
been the cornerstone of individual liberties, even as against the crown, summarized later in
the Bill of Rights its principles have inspired the development of our system of freedom
under law, which is at once our dearest possession and proudest achievement. (May 17,
1959)
You can now see that the common law protects you from the crown, which is the bar
association!! Not the queen!! This is an important piece of the puzzle as we move on THE
CROWN IS NOT THE QUEEN!! It will become even more clear and how important it is to make
this distinction, that the Legal bar association ( often called the Crown) is not the Queen
(often called REGINA or HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN vs. JOE BLOW) who is taking you to court
over statutory laws or codes

http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/about/history.html
The powers generally understood to belong to the Attorney General at common law have
been summarized as follows:
1st. To prosecute all actions, necessary for the protection and defense of the property and
revenues of the crown. 2d. By information, to bring certain classes of persons accused of
crimes and misdemeanors to trial. [3rd.] By scire facias, to revoke and annul grants made
by the crown improperly, or when forfeited by the grantee thereof. 4th. By information, to
recover money or other chattels, or damages for wrongs committed on the land, or other
possessions of the crown. 5th. By writ of quo warranto, to determine the right of him who
claims or usurps any office, franchise or liberty, and to vacate the charter, or annul the
existence of a corporation, for violations of its charter, or for omitting to exercise its
corporate powers. 6th. By writ of mandamus, to compel the admission of an officer duly
chosen to his office, and to compel his restoration when illegally ousted. 7th. By information
in chancery, to enforce trusts, and to prevent public nuisances, and the abuse of trust
powers. 8th. By proceedings in rem, to recover property to which the crown may be
entitled, by forfeiture for treason, and property, for which there is no other legal owner, such
as wrecks, treasure trove, &c. (3 Black. Com., 256-7, 260 to 266; id., 427 and 428; 4 id.,
308, 312.) 9th. And in certain cases, by information in chancery, for the protection of the
rights of lunatics, and others, who are under the protection of the crown. (Mitford's Pl., 2430, Adams' Equity, 301-2.)

8 | Page

The Statute of Westminster, 1931 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom and
separate versions of it are now domestic law within Australia and Canada; it has been
repealed in New Zealand and implicitly by subsequent laws in former Commonwealth
realms. Passed on 11 December 1931, the act, either immediately or upon ratification,
effectively both established the legislative independence of the self-governing Dominions of
the British Empire from the United Kingdom and bound them all to seek each other's
approval for changes to monarchical titles and the common line of succession. It thus
became a statutory embodiment of the principles of equality and common allegiance to the
Crown set out in the Balfour Declaration of 1926. It thus had the effect of making the
Dominions sovereign nations.
The Statute of Westminster's relevance today is that it sets the basis for the continuing
relationship between the Commonwealth realms and the Crown
One can clearly see that even the Statute of Westminster understands the right of self
governance.

What is self governance? Basically do what ever you want except Do know harm and cause
no loss to oyur fellow man.that is what your Creator fundamentally expects of you. This is
what Karl Lentz calls the method more liken to a lifestyle. The lifestyle is that of an
honorable fully realized man What seems to be lacking in most of our cards keeping us
short of being a man, is our inability to stand up for our rights in a court room this will
become clearer as we dig in.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9 | Page

Do you know that coca cola has its own constitution? Every corporation has rules for its
employees,,,that is what a constitution is. Are u confused by the constitution applying to
you? Then why do you thinn its different for Canada of the US of A,, a constitution is the
structure of the bodythe elements of the body..they fought against the bill of rights
because they knew people whould be confused by the people for their bill of rights but for
its citizens, thats a different thing!! But it is a benefit to be part of coca cola at some times..
but if you dont then u dont have to be a member of their family!! Chose with the capacity
of a man and opt in and out at will

Americans pledge allegiance to the Republic instead of a democracy.

The person gov created was from your afterbirth..look up after born in black law they
have control over child because they have their definition..but you cant find man in their
definitions. Because they cant define their creator..so where do our rights first appear in
writing is the bible!! There is no mention of Human once in the bible..thats because god only
believes in man rigths..human rightsa was an invention of the legal society.. look up person
in 7th edition and you will see person is defined as human. I submit human is not man
because its a different word..hu is a prefix that means not quiteso hu man mena not quite
man monster in black laws also say monster is a human!! The after borth is the id and the
monster..maternity ward delivery all legal terms!!

Is the 'STATE OF TEXAS' going to take the witness stand and point you out across the
courtroom and verify your possession of marijuana caused him harm?
Him: "No, I don't suppose so , LOL"
Me: Then who's going to show up and verify that claim?
Him: "The D.A.?"

10 | P a g e

Me: Does the D.A. have any first hand knowledge? Did you harm him or his property? Does
he have ANY skin in this game whatsoever, other than to unjustly enrich himself and the
STATE OF TEXAS?
Him: "No."
Me: Then I guess the D.A. is filing false claims against you in the form of a criminal
'complaint', and you need to file a claim on his sorry ass and drag him into court as a
defendant for several trespasses:
1. Filing false claims in the form of criminal complaints.
2. Committing Barratry.
3. Malicious Prosecution.
4. Extortion.
5. Unjust Enrichment.
6. Wasting your time and money dealing with his silly complaint.

Although USA is not a commonwealth nation its a Constitution Republic that operates under
the common law so this also applies to them

So lets take a close look at the american systemIn a republic, which is the United States of
America, everybody rights are protected unlike a democracy where a few can control others
with a 60 / 40 vote the 60 can determine the 40 laws and impose on them ..but a
republic preserves everyones right with a trial by jury, because if one person on the jury
thinks your not guilty that means that someone in that society, one of its members will be
comprimizeed by this judgement so we must let the man go..in Greece they had 1000 jurors
because the thinking was you couldnt bribe a 1000 peopletoday we think 12 people cant
be bribed hence this jury is what protects mans rights this day!

11 | P a g e

If you are willing to pay the debt and they dont accept your payment the debt is no longer
due..

Babel is how the language was confounded

Common law is not written anywhere

English common law has a structure but common law doesnt

There are good Samaritan laws in some states will hold men and women liable for not
helping if they can help!!! Like watching people get into a fight and you dont help!!! Look if
you dont get involved you better call the police asapdont just stand and watch u better
be doing something proactive to help your fellow man!!!

U are allowed to defend yourself..it called self helpif someone take your child you dont
have to wait for police u can act immediately!!

You can either play the loop hole game by tearing the statute apart just by looking at the
words it is made up ofor the common law game.

Felon is as low as u can be (look at shakespear..as means a guy who is going to bj another)

There is probably a government rehabilitation to help your person get in the good graces of
the legal society..

12 | P a g e

Our parents contract us over not with the government!!!we never signerd the document!!

Crown is the bar associationthere is no queen of Canada

Its a matter of controversy.
Guilt in german means debt..
So if u fall under the citizenship of the legal bar association then u have to accept their
charge of guilt and pay!!!

U would be hard pressed to find out a unite states birth certificate because that was invited
for the slaves..u can find New York state birth certificates..

U need a birth certificate from the place u want to buy land...

Jail is for less than one year prison is for serious crimes!!!
Jail is waiting for trial!! In jail he can file a claim and wait for his court date

The prosecutors need case law citations and their 300 pg complaint. Man just needs about 8
words!!

We dont have to believe what the police officer says i did wrong..let them have their
belief..in this society we settle our difference in front of a judge

As a man we are comfortabole being a defendant only if another man is accusing us because
we can defend ourselves and speak.that is when u want to be a defendant

13 | P a g e

The solial security number is not for you to give awayu r in naked possession of it its the
states creation hence their property

Just imagine that everything on the government paperwork is written in chinesse..

Since man created government and man doesnt have jurisdiction of another manunless
they volunteer and if i did volunteer well then now i no longer volunteer.

They cant testify to what you made and u dont have to testify against yourself!!
I have no clue how much i made last year and there is no law that requires me too keep such
an accounting!!

The gov cant force u to be a citizen u can be one or not whenever u want and for however
long u want.. until it benefits you!!

If you sign your name to it you are responsible for it!!

Statues of limitation is for statues there is none for man..man is fluid and dynamic

14 | P a g e

Freedom has the right to be wrong not do wrong? And now i speak out to the whole world to
forgive me of any debt or any trespass if i have done wrong to any man!

u can kill men in the bible but not man...

A congress is a bunch of baboons!!

THE SYSTEM WANTS YOU TO BELIEVE THAT THERE THEY CAN PLAY THIS SYSTEM WITH THE
PRESUMPTION THAT YOU ARE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY BUT THE TRUTH IS THE
MOMENT THE OFFICER GIVES U THE TICKET U ARE GUILTY U NEED TO DEFEND YOURSELF
FROM THE BEGINNING WITH THE NOOSE ON YOUR NECK. Its summary conviction court for
traffic offences..u have been convicted
U HAVE TO STOP BELIEVING THAT INNONCENT OR GUILTY ARE SOMETHING DETERMINED
LATER.. YOU ARE GUILTY AND THEY ARE TRYING TO GET U IN THEIR COURT TO
AUTOMATICALLY CEMENT IT JUST WITH YOUR PRESENCE AND ACCEPTING THE NAME IS
INSTANTLY OVER THE TRIAL AND YOU DINT EVEN KNOW IT!!!

People are under the presumption that they can actually be found innocent in an
administrative court!!! Thats the fatal mistake!!! They want u to show up to cement their
victory and jurisdiction over you the moment u claim the name its over at that moment!!

Futility of trying to win in the legal system, that system has no power over a man

Before 1875 there were no united states citizen civil rights were for freeing the slaves
there were only states citizens.there are no united states citizen until they freed and
wandering citizenless slaves because all the states were not giving them citizen ship..

15 | P a g e

because your birth certificate has your state on itthe united states citizen was created to
have jurisdicition over the slaves

We are not member of the coca cola familythe united states i am not an employee of it..
Is it the united states or is it the unites states of America?

I will play the citizen card when it is a benefit to me!!

They may let u play prose but in the end they can pull the rug at any time!!

U could have a killer prose case but a judge can pull the old u dont have a bar card and
deny everything.

Federal is also Canadian court..Federal is universal

We are not practicing law we are simply giving our opinion just like any supreme court judge
is doing..i am not practicing anything!!

A total financial collapse could be what they use to set up a code land..the bankers will look
for full immunity..

Derogation
DEROGATION, noun
1. The act of annulling or revoking a law, or some part of it. More generally, the act of taking
away or destroying the value or effect of any thing, or of limiting its extent, or of restraining
its operation; as, an act of parliament is passed in derogation of the kings prerogative; we
cannot do any thing in derogation of the moral law.

16 | P a g e

2. The act of taking something from merit, reputation or honor; a lessening of value or
estimation; detraction; disparagement; with from or of; as, I say not this in derogation of
Virgil; let nothing be said in derogation from his merit.

Interfere and interference are two different things one has to do with radio waves

Suffer, man, claim, wrong, accidental negligence are words to know..

Understand the they, the you and the i covered..

Its is crucial to understand that ones birth certificate in essence created two of you the 3d
lawful and the 2d legal version.
Tyranny through the constitution

It doesnt matter if you know the codes inside outur still the defendant..ur still just a
lowest rank in their system.. a punching judy their codes have nothing to do with a man

Even if sec. 18 wasnt amended so what if they did?? Remember the necessary and proper
clause..

U go after the man who is the ceo or who is in control of the corporation or government
agency for the entity and it's employees that work for him are doing and causing u harm

Common law is not written downit is what u think is common to you in there traffic
courts it is common to act their way

17 | P a g e

I believe it is common law that it is common for me to move form point a to point b

When u ask for forgiveness for acting poorly in public they have to let you go..not put you
in jail

Wrong means u knew what you doing is wrong way before you did itit means u conspired
and planned it before the moment.

You are bring a civil common law case..

This man caused me harm due to his inactions.(where applicable)

A badge will not save a mam acting as a police officer for a personal injury suit..

Mr. and Mrs. are legal titles avoid them like the plague..they taught us that this is a correct
formal way to talk about each other whne in truth it gives the legal society jurisdiction..

Interacting in the public as a man

A man can be a menace to societyu can breach the peace by pulling a fire alarm and
cause no harm but its still something u can not do u are liable for breaching the peace
because everyone has the right to be let alonesome one could easily file that claim..

18 | P a g e

Travel vs. move

U can get 800 definitions of what travel could mean. But only one for the word move..use
move not travel to define your actionthe other is a crappy title. In one of its many
definitions

If i cant tell another where to move or interfere with another movement what makes its
right for another man to do that to you? They better be stopping me because i am going to
harm someone not conjectureit must be real damage..if there is real damage we will pay
for it

The greatest mistake people make in the common wealth is believing the the church and
state are separate.canon law are but of of many ties that makes one aware of the
complete tie in

Dean Clifford was in jail because his was waiting for his trial date because he failed to
appear for court he was on a bond and failed to show up in person to court and thought he
could do it with paperwork!!

It is very easy for a civilized man to act evil but it is impossible for an evil man to look civil..
Its is easy for a man to pretend he is a person but it is impossible for a person to be a man.

This is why its a life style!! Being a man is being a responsible!! The more u learn about the
law the more lawful i want to be.

19 | P a g e

Man's relationship to the government and the birth certificate

Government if they had a profit would have to share it with the people much like dividents.
So that is why they are always claiming a deficit
Khadafy of Libya was actually doing this because they were having profit hence they bought
people a lot if wealth cars homes and free education!

Where the statutory world is headed

What if speeding up saved your life because u would have avoided the car crash just simply
because of a timing issue? Hence is peeding actually saving my life..it could be easily seen
that the speeding limit is just a conjecture on both side. And if safety is the issue i will
determine that for myself as i am a man and i have the ability to move form point a to point
b . so if the government isnt liable for anything because u were going 100 miles the speed
limit that means it is just a suggestion the decision is ultimately mine. Thank for the
suggestion and i will take it under consideration.

Codes and statutes are not being eliminated they are being expanded everydaytime to
wake up and rise above and claim your status as a man If we dont learn how to be a man
they will control you as a legal person!!

We live in a world where 99% of the world wants to be run by legalese in a world where they
want to be told what to do..none wants to live in common sense land where the common law
is what u think the law is!! The the real problem and there is no end in sight unless u believe
in bibleand its says its going to get worse before it gets better..

20 | P a g e

the bible was written either by the roman empire (which the majority of governments fall
under to date) and they say they operate under..and its simply a control tool.. or as i see
it
It is the word of god and if you study it closer it reveals to you how to win in court and play
the lawful game and that it comes from closely examining the way jesus handled his trial
he wons three trials against king herod and potiuos pilot twice and on the last time he
washed his hand of the decision of the jury.. and the sacrifice of his life was to show us the
power of the jury over the wishes of pilot himself who said jesus was a just man in his trial
its brilliant when u look at it with lawful eyes jesus truly is the way because he showed us
the way!!!
even the roman paul showed his errors in claiming himself a citizen of roman and then
became subject to their laws and then imprisoned for life..died under house arrest..hence be
wary of claiming your citizenship as sometimes it may not be a benefit but sometimes it is!!!
Use it wisely!!

If u sign it ur liable..so be wary of wat u sign!

This is a all or nothing life style..it doesnt work if dont believe in god!!a judge who knows all
of this can smell and detected whether u are a god fearing man!! Faith is a basic
requirement..

All anybody can have on code law is an OPINION on it. Bring in 9 Supreme Court judges and
all they can do is have an OPINION on the law, they cant actually tell you what the law
means because they didnt create it. You didnt write that book, I didnt write that book,
whats that gotta do with me? I dont care about anybodys opinion, opinion is not fact,
unless someone is going to be a liability for their opinion as a man to a fellow man.

Man created government and the crown we are at the top of the food chain!we are made in
the image of god!!and i man built that court house not a legal society!!!man controls not a
legal society!!

A core belief is self governance we dont need government but if u believe u need the
legal society well good for you..thats your belief and u will live and die by itman has the
right to not contract.

21 | P a g e

All the lawyers paperwork in a common law court is just hearsay. Its the only way they can
get their paperwork in..
Man is my title given to me by God, you, tax collector, have a tittle granted to you by some
other public servant. He who grants cant take it away also..

People believe gov and courts are in cahoots if so, why did they destroy evidence on 911!
Clinton was drag into court.people need to understand they fear the court system too!!
Lawyers cant use the word the word Man
Blacks law defeines PROPERTY. That which is peculiar or proper to any person; that which
belongs exclusively to one; in the strict legal sense, an aggregate of rights which are
guaranteed and protected by the government.
PROPERTY. That which is peculiar or proper to any person; that which belongs exclusively to
one; in the strict legal sense, an aggregate of rights which are guaranteed and protected by
the government. Fulton Light, Heat & Power Co. v. State, 65 Misc.Rep. 263, 121 N.Y.S. 536.
The term is said to extend to every species of valuable right and interest. McAlister v.
Pritchard, 230 S.W. 66,67, 287 Mo. 494. More specifically, ownership; the unrestricted and
exclusive right to a thing; the right to dispose of a thing in every legal way, to possess it, to
use it, and to exclude every one else
from interfering with it. Mackeld. Rom. Law, 265. That dominion or indefinite right of use or
disposition which one may lawfully exercise over particular things or subjects.
Transcontinental
Oil Co. v. Emmerson, 298 Ill. 394, 131 N.E. 645, 647, 16 A.L.R. 507. The exclusive right of
possessing,
enjoying, and disposing of a thing. Barnes v. Jones, 139 Miss. 675, 103 So. 773, 775, 43
A.L.R.
673; Tatum Bros. Real Estate & Investment Co. v. Watson, 92 Fla. 278, 109 So. 623, 626. The
highest right a man can have to anything; being used for that right which one has to lands
or tenements, goods or chattels, which no way depends on another man's courtesy. Jackson
ex dem. Pearson v. Housel, 17 Johns. 281, 283. The right of property is that sole and
despotic dominion which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the
world, in total exclusion of the right of any other individual in the universe. It consists in the
free use, enjoyment, and disposal of all a person's acquisitions, without any control or
diminution save only by the laws of the land. 1 BI.Comm. 138; 2 Bl.Comm. 2, 15; Great
Northern Ry. Co. v. The word is also commonly used to denote everything which is the
subject of ownership, corporeal or incorporeal, tangible or intangible, visible or invisible, real
or personal; everything that has an exchangeable value or which goes to make up wealth or
estate. It extends to every species of valuable right and interest, and includes real and
personal property, easements, franchises, and incorporeal hereditaments. Samet v. Farmers'

22 | P a g e

& Merchants' Nat. Bank of Baltimore, C.C.A.Md., 247 F. 669, 671; Globe Indemnity Co. v.
Bruce, C.C.A. Okl., 81 F.2d 143, 150.
CORPOREAL, CORPOREOUS, adjective Having a body; consisting of a material body;
material; opposed to spiritual or immaterial; as our corporeal frame; corporeal substance.

Government was scared enough to destroy all its evidence of 1 trillion missing form the
pentagon on 911 because even they are afraid of getting caught by the courts!!! So they
destroyed the evidence just like john gotty!!!
Man has rights..government has authority

Your car might be registeredthat means the state own the title(they can take the title) ..u
are in possession..who ncould claim otherwise?
Our law in canada comes from the customs of the people..thats our law not the constitution..
President Obama's Convention Speech---As citizens, we understand that America is not
about what can be done for us. It's about what can be done by us, together (cheers,
applause) through the hard and frustrating but necessary work of self-government. That's
what we believe.
Remarks by President Obama at the 50th Anniversary ---These are not just words. Theyre
a living thing, a call to action, a roadmap for citizenship and an insistence in the capacity
of free men and women to shape our own destiny. For founders like Franklin and Jefferson,
for leaders like Lincoln and FDR, the success of our experiment in self-government rested
on engaging all of our citizens in this work. And thats what we celebrate here in Selma.
Thats what this movement was all about, one leg in our long journey toward freedom.
(Applause.)

Learn to play stupid in court!!! Its to lure the man outget them for their confessions!!
Ficticious litigation

From 0 to 18 u lived under somebody elses rule..

99.995% off the time we self govern
They dont tell anybody when to drink a coffee!!
So wat government did say it hasa monopoly on is driving
instead we say we are moving from point a to point b
So we let them have their little words and

23 | P a g e

we remove their presumption that we are driving show them we are moving
this eliminates the contraversy and we win..

terrorism is the interference of the function pf government and if u r self governing then a
police officer is terrorizing u

Courts are legittey forced the president Clinton to appear for his case against pamela
jonesu can curn a president if u like

A complaint must be registered by a private person(so a man) Is REGINA A PRIVaTE

PERSON!!!

Ur reading their case to see if they have an actuall claim for harm injury or loss in their suit
or not!!

Say they have some doc u signed just say u dont recall sigin itwho is going to verify it?
has anyone had this document in the possession since the time it was delivered upon the
united state ?nooooi dont think so!!!
i dont recall!!

Man vs. men, and their ability to own property

24 | P a g e

Nobody (including government) can control you if they dont have a proper claim.

God gave up the property rights of the child to the mother and father and cannot claim it
back? Bible?

Tort is where a man can make a claim.

We are not men, just as we are not you. I a man am not plural.
Mankind refers to our species, not menkind.

This code stuff is Babylonian. Uniting the world as one etc.

Government doesnt have rights, it has a charter or contract or constitution. Which clearly
defines its parameters which interacts and intercourses with the public.

The 9th and 10th amendments and how they relate to man

Basically the 9th amendedment means tha just because we wrote this contract it doesnt
negate the fact that any law or rule of law that is anteceded to the constitution no longer
exist
U dont have to rely on the 2nd amendment u can say man has always had the right to
defend himself..so the government can get in the way of that..

25 | P a g e

Power means to control another in the 10th its gives the state power over the individual
who wants that?

The 9th is key not the tenth..because you have the right that predate the constitution!!

Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution

The Ninth Amendment (Amendment IX) to the United States Constitution, which is part of
the Bill of Rights, addresses rights, retained by the people, that are not specifically
enumerated in the Constitution.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or
disparage others retained by the people. [1]

Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to
the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [3]
The 9th amendment is key, not 10th, this is how you would defend yourself if you had an
illegal weapon in your house for self-defense. Because no one can take away our ability to
defend ourself.

What is the Canadian parallel? Is it listed anywhere in the constitution that they can strip
rights that were in existence before this docs creation?

Article the ninth... In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed
twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall
be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of
the common law.

26 | P a g e

CONJECTURE is not HARM DONE.

In mathematics, a conjecture is a conclusion or proposition based on incomplete information,
but for which no proof has been found.

i am a man not sovereign which is god..i bow to no man but i do bow down to god!!

Criminal = 6th, civil = 7th.

Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a
public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury,
and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence
against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involving terrorism, but
much more often figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selection or the protection
of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of protection from
retaliation.
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by
an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed,
which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the
nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to
have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of
counsel for his defense.

Seventh Amendment
The Seventh Amendment continues a practice from English common law of distinguishing
civil claims which must be tried before a jury (absent waiver by the parties) from claims and
issues that may be heard by a judge alone. It only governs federal civil courts and has no
application to civil courts set up by the states when those courts are hearing only disputes of
state law.
Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right
of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined
in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Todays a lovely day to be arrested, would you like to place that order with me?

27 | P a g e

You want my address? Is that an order? Ok Ill perform that service for you.

Do not CONform, PERform.

I have the right under article 9 of the bill of rights to move this case into a common law
court of record. Now if its criminal its article 6, if its civil its article 7. And I have the right
to move to a trial by jury where I get to face my accuser. And nobody in a black robe can
interpret my beliefs&my claim&my case except for the jury. That person in the black robe,
that clerk, cant interrupt with that process, not allowed to look in our case, not allowed to
read it, not allowed to do ANYTHING with it.

If a fictional character comes after us

You tried to administer my property without any rights? Only man has rights. You have
duties and obligations and responsibilities.

- What a common law courtroom looks like

The jury is central and the magistrate sometimes sits behind everyone.. and these common
law courts are never usedcourt are very unfamiliar

Evoke vs. invoke

Evoke is to invite to summons.. thats simple we are evoking

28 | P a g e

REGINA v. JOHN DOE & HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. JOHN DOE..why do we presume its the
queen or even why do we presume this the Queen of Canada not Trinidad? Why not simply
ask who is REGINA? And shut up..
- Understanding the nature of Queens Bench

Some say in 1875 an act of parliament abolished or merged queens bench. Queens bench is
a set of rules. Queens bench is just one man who appears and requires another man to
appear and move their claims.
There may come a time when America will say no more claims courts.. but it wont stop karl
from making a claim in a court house because he is a man and he is sovereign and man
created the court.. its like telling god he cant create any stars or moons any more without
governemnets permision with your codes and statutesbut it aint going to mean a
thing..its nutty..

I dont care what a piece of paper says from 1875 that person whose there did not contract
on my behalf does not act on my behalf, i cant bring that man to court to prove whether or
not that is the accurate and true article which he created. I cant tell if its a forgery and i
dont really give a damn

The tower of babel is the judeaux belief of how this happenned ..we all came out of the
same part of the world why do we have such different languages
This isnt a lawfull rebellion. This is by lawfull authority were are going to hold the man the
judge liable for failing to recognize the common law.

When ur walking into a code world ur generally walkikng into a summary convictions
court ..which means your already guilty because you are in breach of a contract for driving
or what evre action under a code. So they dont have to disclose why you are there..they are
going to disclose all the terms and conditions because your are ASSUMED(liable for the debt)
not presumed to have known. Thats why they presume the have the authority to control
you and have jurisdiction over you

Common law is the customs of the people and these rules have been around since cave man
times.. if i believed my neighbor did me wrong i could to a community elder or gather all the
males and females together and we are gonna judge and determine whose bone was that?
is it mine or my neighbors , did he steal it, did he get paid or did he unjustly enrich himself

29 | P a g e

If ur in Saudia Arabia read the Koran ..the cow in particular....here u read king James
leviticus and deutorony...

What is property?

Restoration of property hearing/return of property hearing.

Property is defined by what I have made myself personally. What Ive begotten. My kids, my
dreams, anything we put equity into. Our equity is our property. We didnt build the
house/car, but we put sweat equity into it (maintenance, security etc.)
The things we buy with our sweat equity (car/house) we make claim for, we have the highest
claim to it as our property, but really its not our property. I own this property that just
happens to be on this land. (we cant own land.)
Signing the birth certificate is not harmful/doesnt do anything to you, its actually the only
evidence that you have claim to the land. Its the additional benefits after that which
messes with us.

If the bank thinks they can give IRS our money and that weve given them the right to do
that, we didnt. Tell me specifically where it says that Ive given you authorization to give my
property away to a third party. (in their contract)

Declaration of independence: Men are endowed with certain unalienable rights by their
creator life, liberty, pursuit of happiness. To this end, governments are instituted among men
with their consent. There is no other purpose to government.

30 | P a g e

Madison: The diversity in the faculties of men, from which the rights of property originate, is
not less an insuperable obstacle to an uniformity of interests. The protection of these
faculties is the first object of government.

My relationship to my kid is my property, my kid calls me mommy, mommy is the property

of the kid.
property (n.) Look up property at Dictionary.com
c. 1300, properte, "nature, quality," later "possession, thing owned" (early 14c., a sense rare
before 17c.), from an Anglo-French modification of Old French propriete "individuality,
peculiarity; property" (12c., Modern French propret; see propriety), from Latin proprietatem
(nominative proprietas) "ownership, a property, propriety, quality," literally "special
character" (a loan-translation of Greek idioma), noun of quality from proprius "one's own,
special" (see proper). For "possessions, private property" Middle English sometimes used
proper goods. Hot property "sensation, a success" is from 1947 in "Billboard" stories.

Do not put our person into a trust, we did not create our person so we dont have the
jurisdiction to do that.

To rescind or not to rescind a contract

Dont rescind contracts with government (birth certificate/citizenship/drivers license etc.),
we didnt sign it with a man, we signed it with a machine. We are beneficiaries to the
government trust, beneficiaries dont have the right to full disclosure. The government was
created for our benefit but we are not the trustees so we dont have control over it.

Man to agency contracts are not binding; man to man contracts are binding. An agency is
not going to hold us liable for what we signed lol.
The only way to get out of a man to man contract is to have a judge (jury) judge the contract
to be unconscionable.

The judge has a special role to protect both the 2D and the 3D.

31 | P a g e

There are a variety of judges out there, as we go up they get better (smarter judges who
know their shtuff)

Note to self: if we start to become a jerk and a well-known face in the courts, theyre going
to do their best to set us straight. Be kind. Please.

The number one reason for the judge is to maintain status quo!! Not to make new law but to
see is everyone behaving this way then fine..let it remain normal!!

KL dad use to say an honest man should be able to live his life without once ever signing
his name to a contract thats sage advice!!

If i was black in court i would never say i was a slave at one time because it may move your
status to less than a manhave them prove you were property is the better questionwho
can bring tht evidence?? None because again any contract u didnt sign carries no obligation
to oneself.implied vs expressed

There is a famous slave case where a black man lost his freedom in court because he did
understand property rights he made the mistake (in my opinion) of reminding the court of
the sale! This sale clearly indicates property!!! He should have just said he was a man and
that there is no contract and they would have to produce iteven if the y produce it he says
he is not a party to it and his signature is not on it. So anything it says is only implied and
not expressed as all good law is. So out goes the contract and the property stand and all
they are left with is a man who wants to be let alone and now who has the right to enslave
another man? And its check mateno jurisdiction!!

32 | P a g e

That is why your child is your property!!! Dont define it any other way..that makes you the
master!!

This case they say started the civil war! The Marxist came around screaming that no one
should one property..KL says why dont we just say another man cant own another man
instead of this communist ideaology!!

Learn to say i dont know what the word son means or what the word daughter means you
only see your property!!! Give the property back to me!! back off the property!! no trespass
on the property!!

But nothing beats common law!!!

But what is to learned from this is that even within statutes there is remedies if you dig deep
enough.. heads up to those in Napoleonic countries!!

The creation of man cannot harm man!!!

Lawyers could find this if they wanted and make it short and sweet because government
cant harm man but lawyers make their money using statutes!!

I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the
mind of man.
Thomas Jefferson

Important general concept that newbies need to understand is that there are many different
types of courtif you are looking for justice you are looking for the highest court in the

33 | P a g e

English common law courts are that on this land and its fundamentally the only court that
protects your rights as a man.
Yes that is the first bubble how many different courts are there? Well there is tax court,
family court, provincial court, federal courtsso which one??? Well not the write question
let me explain The next concept is why there are different courts? this is what brings up
the person and man concepts to the for frontbecause all the courts basically see you only
in those two general capacities..why?? because one they can control and one they cannot
control the other.. a person is a citizen or a police officer are some of the title under this
category.basically a person is someone who has duties and obligationsman on the
contrary is born free of duties and obligations ( man even choses whether they are obligated
to their family or not) but if man choses to where the title of citizen (hence converting
himself inot a person) well then the laws ARE written for you (just look at the statutes real
close they use person not man) but if you want to be a man and have all you rights well then
you have to look closely at what your rights are..what are you rights?? Can an Australian
come to America and file a civil rights complaint? No he cannot because he is not a citizen or
person of the united states of America because only a citizen has those (limited) civil
rights.so he if he wanted to have justice would have to file a claim. That brings up how
you file The claim vs the complaintthe courts will generally try and get you to use their
paper work (which we will get into the reason for that later) but u will see they are always
trying to frame you as a complainer by making you file a complaint you want to file a
claim so lets get started and look at the whole process closer and in more detail

No matter where I go in the world, the first thing anyone would think is that I am a man, not
that Im Canadian or that Im Australian etc.

In 1988 1989 there used to be millions of soviet union citizens, what happened to them?
Did a million people just disappear off the face of the earth? But I bet theres still a MAN
living there, he remained a man, but is he still a soviet citizen? Thats ridiculous. Only on a
piece of paper can a citizen exists.

The correlation between common law and common sense should be clear. Logic that is
common to the people.
1. We probably havent done anything wrong

34 | P a g e

2. We live on common law land

3. No man has come forth claiming weve done harm or that we owe any debt.
Just presume that everything I do is illegal, but unless you got a man claiming I did
something wrong, I wish to be let alone. I dont answer to complaints, I only answer to
claims.

If they point to a piece of paper saying is that you?

We say gosh no do I look like I am 8.5 inches tall, 11 inches wide and thin as a sheet? Are
you crazy?
Dont get locked into the paper world.

By believing that its US money, we give the US control/jurisdiction over the money.

What law do you have me under?

Theyll say 1972 bill of blah blah blah
I guarantee that youre not going to find my name in signature on that contract.
So it neither binds I the man or my person.
The law doesnt have Karl the man, it needs to be expressed, not implied, to be good law.

We can only hold a man liable when he believes, so we try to get them to say.
Do you believe I owe the debt? What do you believe BOB? Oh you do? Then put that on
paper and sign it.

Self governing is all about making up your own rules

35 | P a g e

Understanding statute and common law courts

Statutes courts are for government on citizens and common law courts is for contract
between parties

Being a claimant is not a bad title!!

Be precise with your words, and the common laws of different peoples
Blacks Law will kill words by misdefining it with synonyms.
Dont use stolen, say instead taken and carried off, or larceny
L'ARCENY, noun [Latin latrocinium.]
Theft; the act of taking and carrying away the goods or property of another feloniously.
larceny is of two kinds; simple larceny or theft, not accompanied with any atrocious
circumstance; and mixed or compound larceny which includes in it the aggravation of taking
from one's house or person, as in burglary or robbery. The stealing of any thing below the
value of twelve pence, is called petty larceny; above that value, it is called grand larceny

Dont give anyone an opportunity of a loophole, dont use stole, it has many definitions.
STOLE, preterit tense of steal.
STOLE, noun
1. A long vest or robe; a garment worn by the priests of some denominations when they
officiate. It is a broad strip of cloth reaching from the neck to the feet.
2. [Latin] A sucker; a shoot from the root of a plant, by which some plants may be
propagated; written also stool.

36 | P a g e

.what?
If a man chops down one of our trees, carries it off and makes a chair out of it, we can only
claim for what the tree was worth, the chair is HIS sweat equity, we can only claim for what
we lost. We can only claim for what is due.
Only God knows the truth and were all just guessing, all this fraud is bringing us closer to
god.

- Practicing law without a license

Were not practicing law. I do not believe Im practicing law, do you claim/believe Im
practicing law? How do you define practice?

They say in Canada you must blah blah blah we say I am not IN Canada, I am UPON the
land, also known as Canada. Im AT Canada, I walk ON TOP of the land. If Im IN Canada Id
be dead.

You have the right to believe what you want

There is a million customs and traditions out thereso u just have to remember the most
important law.. do no harm!!

- Less words say more

Dont say no yes and ask them to put it in the form of an order!! Then send them a bill!!!

The nature of the man, characteristics of the man, reputation of the man, all 3 standing
before the court at all times. So we must act honourably.

37 | P a g e

Its not only my belief its also your law states it too. Its my rights and its their lawsthey
are in violation of their own codes and ordinances..

U.S. Code Title 42 Chapter 21 Subchapter I 1983

42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of
any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any
citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation
of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable
to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress,
except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in
such officers judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory
decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section,
any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to
be a statute of the District of Columbia.
I am not saying that i ; i am comaparing that their codes say they cant do it as a public
official to a citizen of the united states..

They in violation of their own nonsense that they write

the Constituion
Article the ninth .. In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed
twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall
be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of
the common law.
More correctly..
Bill of rights seventh

38 | P a g e

Seventh Amendment
Main article: Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right
of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined
in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

You cant sue an administrative hearing officers as he owes u nothing as he works for the
state( just as if he was working for coca cola)
But when u evoke the common law he owes u his services because u have files a claim and
paid for it..your property
I had the right to drag anybody before a common law court of record way before the
constitution and the unites states existed in 1776 just because u came up with a new
constitution in 1793 doesnt mean we are going to forget about the old ways..

A honest man should be able to go through life without signing his name once

Im not a freeman, Im not a sovereign man, Im just a man. No titles. Titles diminish our
capacity. Man creates government, government answer to man.

Using proper language

The more words we use the more conditions we put on something, the more its diminished.
I love thee >I love thee so much today

Convene your own court even if its after hours..

39 | P a g e

Magna carta and the constitution as a defence

The 1215 magan carta was signed with a knife to the kings throat.. so this nullified it so
which one are u going to bring in to court? And are u going to bring the original signers to
testify to what its exact meaning is? NO IS THE ANSWER so dont use it in your arguments
but u may put it as an exhibit and adding that this is the way they use to do things way back
when and i believe it a good document and a proper way of acting and still holds up as a
good way to behave today.. dont interpret the Magana carta or anyone else document s for
that matter

U dont know if thats the original one, where is the chain of custody of that document? And
how many copies where written? Just like the constitution it was written so that 13 different
vertions each colony got ther own one slightly different..

Dont waste our time with their documents!! They have nothing to do with you as you arent
a party to them!!

Just because alont time ago they signed the Magana carta or the constitution fo
your benefit guess what you dont have to take the benefit!! And none can
force the benefit on me so the constitution is just a reference point that at one
time they thought this was the way to be..that is allwho cares times change!!
Man is not rigid or a statute he is flexible, dynamic, not bound and ever changing
that is the only thing that remains the same.
You are only crossing swords with word nerds, word masters!!but know the swords are
words crosswords!! Crossing swords!!
Conditional accept anything confusing like the mckeinzei friend titla and baliman
Only a man can ask for payment for an order

You must show they never had jurisdiction over you because you are a man.. or else
theyhave jurisdiction and can obligate you if you follow the order without compensation..
cant we ask to be paid upfront

Its like the wizard of oz once u see there is no government or IRS or CRA its all fictions and u
are just setting them up to reveal they are fictions by demonstrating that the fictions cant
appear before an open court in a common law court of record.. checkmate!!!

40 | P a g e

Third party impartial witness protect black men of false rape allegations.. third party
impartial(nothignt to gain) is so key that mobster like John Gotti just wacked witness to stay
on the streets So evidence like blood samples dna swab are all circumstanticial and can be
manipulatedbecause of the chain of command isnt sterile..it could be easily influenced to
get whatever result they want but third party impartial witness isnt not circumstantial
evidence because that is like hearing from god himself.god and your fellow man can judge
you because man is in the image of god..
Legalese---Circumstantial evidence is evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a
conclusion of factlike a fingerprint at the scene of a crime. By contrast, direct evidence
supports the truth of an assertion directlyi.e., without need for any additional evidence or
inference.
Legalese--Direct Evidence--Evidence that stands on its own to prove an alleged fact, such as
testimony of a witness who says she saw a defendant pointing a gun at a victim during a
robbery. Direct proof of a fact, such as testimony by a witness about what that witness
personally saw or heard or did.

Common law according to American Jurisprudence

[15 American Jurisprudence 2d Com L 1]. In a broader sense, the common law is the
system of rules and declarations of principals from which our judicial ideas and legal
definitions are derived, and which are continually expanding; it is not a codification of exact
or inflexible rules for human the redress of injury or for the protections against wrongs; but
is rather the embodiment of a broad and comprehensive un written principles inspired by
natural reason and an innate sense of justice and adopted by common consent for the
regulation of government of the affairs of men has been termed the legal embodiment of
practical sense whose guiding star has always been the rule of right and wrong and whose
principles demonstrate that there is in fact as well as in theory remedy for all wrong; while in
one sense the term common law has no fixed meaning, since it varies with time and place;
when viewed as a system for deducing from litigated instances, just, reasonable and
consistent rules it can be said that the common law never changes

Karl's 5 step process

1. notice cease and desist.. ( if cps storms your house and robs your property(child)
ignore this step and go straight to court. But if u have time insert this step in to try

41 | P a g e

and be honorable..but its your call.. is it an emergency or notthink and be

reasonable..it is reasonable to not hesitate a second when it comes to your children.
2. File your claim and set the rules of your court in a preliminary hearing
3. Place your order unless you did it already with your claim

when someone brings a complaint you move on it in less than 3 days write back
i think i have a piece of paper in front of me for me. I think i see some writing, i think i see
some word, i think i might see something that i understand but what i truly dont understand
is if the hand or the proof of man or a woman existing . i dont see a signature or name on
this piece of paper.
So you better move your complaint against me now or drop it immediately. Dont wait 6
month when someone says you do wrong.. move on that immediately and demand the claim
from the man or woman so that you can immediately compensate them. They wont have a
real man in reply thats your evidence that they are making a false claim..make your claim
like lightning..

do not waste anytime clearing your good name..

Corporations don't exist

The WWF was sued and lost a billion dollar judgement..all they did to avoid is to change the
name to WWE
go after the man 2nd dimension is not real
its what u believe.if u think a piece of paper tells u something or how to behave i cant
help u

In court vs. At court

Common law is man on man thats why u get to face your accuserits the whole purpose
for claiming the right to face your accuser
Meet in the district courtu agreeing to the administrative rules and codes and statutes

42 | P a g e

Meet in your court..u agreeing to go by the rules you set AT the distric court house

U want to be in ur court so u can play by you rules not in the building with their rulesbe at
the public court house in your court ..

It's a word game

Use believe to public servants do you believe that? Are you a state agent? Is that your
belief? Are you denying my belief? any time a judge denies us hes saying were a liar.
Youre saying Im a liar? This is MY court! Dont call me a liar Im gonna call you out. I a man
require you to take the witness stand and testify in open court that what Im saying is not
true. You got first hand knowledge of this? Dont let anyone deny us in our court.

Deny
DENY, verb transitive
1. To contradict; to gainsay; to declare a statement or position not to be true. We deny what
another says, or we deny a proposition. We deny the truth of an assertion, or the assertion
itself. The sense of this verb is often expressed by no or nay.
2. To refuse to grant; as, we asked for bread, and the man denied us.
3. Not to afford; to withhold.
Who find not Providence all good and wise,
Alike in what it gives, and what denies?
4. To disown; to refuse or neglect to acknowledge; not to confess.
5. To reject; to disown; not to receive or embrace.
He hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel. 1 Timothy 5:1.
DENYing ungodliness and worldly lusts. Titus 2:1.

6. Not to afford or yield.

43 | P a g e

To deny ones self, is to decline the gratification of appetites or desires; to refrain from; to
abstain. The temperate man denies himself the free use of spirituous liquors. I denied myself
the pleasure of your company.
God cannot deny himself. He cannot act in contradiction to his character and promises. He
cannot be unfaithful. 2 Timothy 2:12.

President Obama Speaks on Reopening the Government

October 17, 2013 | 19:51 | Public Domain
So let's work together to make government work better, instead of treating it like an enemy
or purposely making it work worse. Thats not what the founders of this nation envisioned
when they gave us the gift of self-government. You dont like a particular policy or a
particular president, then argue for your position. Go out there and win an election. Push to
change it. But dont break it. Dont break what our predecessors spent over two centuries
building. That's not being faithful to what this country is about.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/2013/10/17/president-obama-speaksreopening-government#transcript

Sovereign
SOVEREIGN, adjective suv'eran. [We retain this babarous orthography from the
Norman sovereign The true spelling would be suveran from the Latin supernes, superus.]
1. Supreme in power; possessing supreme dominion; as a sovereign ruler of the universe.
2. Supreme; superior to all others; chief. God is the sovereign good of all who love and obey
him.
3. Supremely efficacious; superior to all others; predominant; effectual; as
asovereign remedy.
4. Supreme; pertaining to the first magistrate of a nation; as sovereignauthority.
SOVEREIGN, noun suv'eran.
1. A supreme lord or ruler; one who possesses the highest authority without control. Some
earthly princes, kings and emperors are sovereigns in their dominions.

44 | P a g e

2. A supreme magistrate; a king.

3. A gold coin of England, value 20s or $4.44

Relevance of the constitution

We didnt write the constitution and we cant bring any of the original founders in the court
to testify as to the truth of the documents meaning. Using the constitution is guessing. It has
nothing to do with man.it was to set up government..
They had issue setting up the bill of rights because this had nothing to do with man.
Waste of time..dont use the constitution or the bill of rights..[cf.] (compare/confer)

Public and private property

No such thing as private property because property is private to begin with.. and public
property makes no sense because public is public not private and property is private.

Dont do real property, its just property. real property gov has control over.

There has to be an eyewitness willing to testify or there is no case. The plaintiff must appear
or there is no case.

Need third party impartial witness when no evidence/contract are included in case,
plaintiff/defendant are 50/50, someone needs to break the balance.

45 | P a g e

Commercial lien process vs. common law process

The administrative process is great and all if you have the time to try and settle the matter
on the private.
But if someone has kid nap your child you dont need to wait 21 days to file your claim
Its not adversarial because u doing this in a common law court..ur there to settle the
controversy.. thats is how you become the moving party and u place your claim before a
tribunal, you place that into a public court house one has surrendered jurisdiction and
control of your paperwork and now its up to the judges to decide the merits of the case..

If a plaintiff does not appear they have no casethis is what we should have in our
paperwork..

The three things recognized as being wrong

3 ways to move a come law court

1. Harming a man or drawing blood
2. u injure his property ( run over his mail box)
3. you break a contract and because of that lie he incurred a financial loss that they can
claim

46 | P a g e

Understanding who you're up against

We cant go after a 2D agency/fictional entity. A man can only go after another man. Find the
man who is liable for harming us. Even with a contract we are going after a man who signed
it. Require the lawyers arguing against us to testify under oath that what theyre saying is
true. Oh youre just reading a piece of paper? Let that piece of paper go and testify then.
The paper doesnt say, it READS but cant say. Whos reading it then? Oh you are? Did you
write it Mr. Attorney? Who wrote it then? Oh it came out of a computer? Is mr. computer
gonna testify to the accuracies of the numbers on that paper? Then whos gonna come forth
and testify to the accuracy of that? Nobody? Then there is no claim.

Public laws are codified by Canadian company Thompsons, because the laws are
exceedingly long. The code is not the law. Theyre coming after us with the code, not the
law. The codes are always going to be written to their favour. Upon close inspection of the
LAW, we will discover that the LAW actually does not interfere with the rights of man. (they
get around it with words like shall, must, persons etc)
Tell them to bring the law before the court. Now is that a law you think I broke? Or is it a
code that you believe may be a partial interpretation of the law?

Legal vs. lawful

everything karl lentz does is illegalhe counts on it and guarantees its is illegal
Because he doesnt careless to try and keep up with government codes that you can change
overnight
And u add to about 803 new codes every day! If you think i am going to read every one of
those and see if i will be in compliance with them, is ridiculous and i aint going to do it.

One has to first show me how the code applies to me and you r going to also show me the
man or woman i have harmed as a result of my actions causing harm or wrong to them.

The codes are getting more ridiculous every day. One day they will try and control the air u
breaththey are already codes put in place to control rain water collectionwise up folks!

47 | P a g e

Who cares about illegal but we care about the law, if i harm a man i want make compensate
them in any way i canwho cares about illegal

Ignore their codesthey cant force u into anything. Its all voluntary.

because you want to separate yourself from the person n this common law landand tell
them i am sorry but i am not liable for what that person did. If you want to go after the
person go after them but me the man better be let alone. If a man says I do wrong and has a
just claim then I would be more than glad to settle with that man and ask forgiveness and
write a check out to them right away.

- History of the necessary and proper

Whatever I deem necessary and proper for my own survival, no one can judge.
Under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, Congress has the power "to make all Laws
which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all
other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or any
Department or Officer thereof".
In the constitutional convention Southern members of the congregation walked out on the
Northern members because the north was proposing this tyrannical clause to the
constitution. Thus the civil war. North won, thus tyranny rules.
Lawyers and attorney have already made their backroom dealscareful they have the
monopoly on the system..this happens a lot!!!bricklayers monopolize this way in Modesto
apparently!! Lawyers dont get paid if the job gets done or not..they simply get billable
hours!! They are going to try and rack it up on you too!!
Its suicide to use their code!! They will change it on you!! Stay clear of codes and statutes!!
If they do this to you, they can turn around and n=ban you from court for frivolous filing
because you were wasting the courts valuable limited resources!

Its a public court house!! Youre the public, so move your case in there!! The legal society
didnt pay for that court house!! The public did!!

48 | P a g e

the government exceeded its jurisdiction and interfered with my right to move

COMMON LAW, lex communis.] Is taken for the law of this kingdom simply, without any
other laws; as it was generally holden before any statute was enacted in parliament to alter
the same; and the kings courts of justice are called the Common Law Courts. The Common
Law is grounded upon the general customs of the realm ; and includes in it the law of
nature, the law of God, and the principles and maxims of the law: it is founded upon
reason; and is said to be the perfection of reason, acquired by long study, observation and
experience, and refined by learned men in all ages. And it is the common birth-right, that
the subject hath for the safeguard and defence, not only of his goods, lands and revenues;
but of his wife and children, body, same, and life also. Co. Lit. 97. 142. Treatise of Laws, p. 2.
[Cf. 1 Toml. L. D. 523-4 ([originally by Giles Jacob] Thomas Edlyne Tomlins ed., 1st Am. ed.
1811)]
Supposedly inscribed across the top of the Justice Department building, on the Ninth Street
side, are the words The common law is derived from the will of mankind, issuing from the
life of the people, framed through mutual confidence, sanctioned by the light of reason.

1) WHAT

IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PERSON AND A MAN?

A man is created in the image of Gd; the Almighty self-existing Creator of the Universe.
Man is endowed by his Creator with certain unalienable rights such as life, liberty, the
pursuit of happiness and other property. To secure and protect mans property, Governments
(persons) are instituted among men (gentiles).
The term person is a generic term and can mean an individual, partnership, joint-stock
company, trust, estate, association, corporation, partnership, LLC, agency, company,
municipality, organization or any other legal or commercial entity of any kind.
Governments are persons and a man or woman with an obligation to perform a specific duty
according to the title they hold within that government is often called a natural person.
Some persons have titles which more obviously carry specific duties such as sheriff, doctor,
magistrate, senator, county prosecutor, building inspector, town manager etc
Some persons have titles which do not so obviously carry specific duties or obligations such
as teacher, employee, mother, father, student, participant, taxpayer, defendant, driver,
citizen, fisherman, child etc

49 | P a g e

Again, a man or woman ACTING in these roles is often referred to as a Natural Person.
A legal fiction is a presumption of fact assumed by a court for convenience, consistency, or
to achieve justice. A corporation is a common legal fiction, regarded in many jurisdictions as
a person who has many of the same legal rights and responsibilities as a natural person.

Offences not to be punishable except under New Zealand Acts

No one shall be convicted of any offence at common law, or of any offence against any Act
of the Parliament of England or the Parliament of Great Britain or the Parliament of the
United Kingdom:
provided that
(a)
nothing in this section shall limit or affect the power or authority of the House of
Representatives or of any court to punish for contempt:
(b)
nothing in this section shall limit or affect the jurisdiction or powers of the Court Martial, or
of any officer in any of the New Zealand forces.

Section 2-Letter writing 15pgs

In our letters During the private administrative process we are removing the controversy by
getting their tacit acquiescence to admitting that they are causing harm and that silence is tacit
agreement with you when you file your claim and you bring that to the magistrate it there's no
controversy... u win

[1/4/2016 1:12:23 PM] David Man: Notice: man

i, man, [David] declare,
Firstly: i, man, am unaware of ever volunteering consent to be treated as a {resident of the
United States; [defined as in 26 U.S. Code 7701 - Definitions]} (see Exhibit A)
Secondly: i, man, know of no man who has shown i of such voluntary consent and believe
none exists;

50 | P a g e

Thirdly: if ever i, man, have unknowingly volunteered or consented to such a thing, i, man,
do not voluntarily consent now;
Fourthly: i, man, wish to not be treated as such a designation and do not voluntarily accept
any such title; i, man, self-govern, require no title, no representation; (See Exhibit B)
Fifthly: i, say all here, and will verify in open court, that all herein be true;
[1/4/2016 1:12:41 PM] David Man: Exhibit A From:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7701
26 U.S. Code 7701 - Definitions
(9) United States
The term United States when used in a geographical sense includes only the States and
the District of Columbia.
(10) State
The term State shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such
construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title.
(1) Person
The term person shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a trust, estate,
partnership, association, company or corporation.
Exhibit B
Obama Speech on Reopening Government 2013:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/10/17/remarks-president-reopeninggovernment
So let's work together to make government work better, instead of treating it like an enemy
or purposely making it work worse. Thats not what the founders of this nation envisioned
when they gave us the gift of self-government.
[1/4/2016 1:13:06 PM] David Man: this is a notice i put together and thought i may be
helpful but i wanted to see what people think.
[1/4/2016 1:44:16 PM] David Man: Greeting: Kathleen Mckeon,

i believe there has been a mistake, i wish to forgive or be forgiven;

On 16 December 2015, i filed claim, not complaint, required it be given to the woman Marian
Ryan, acting as Middlesex County Attorney so she can take action,

51 | P a g e

i, require, trial by jury, common law, as indicated in the original paperwork (also again
attached here with this letter) so i can press my claim;

On 22 December 2015 at 9AM when i arrived to press my claim, i learned that said
paperwork had not been given to said women as required on 16 December 2015, that no
court of record, arranged for i to press said claim, so i filed notice requiring sixty days for
proper council;

i called on 23 December 2015 to inquire about my notice of proper council, i was informed of
a warrant being issued;

i, require to know is said warrant for the legal name or the man so i am able to identify if the
man or woman issuing it wishes to order the man to appear;

i require you send a copy of alleged warrant signed by the man or woman who issued it
along with a copy of the bond attached to it to the man at the above location listed herein;

i require you give my claim to Marian Ryan, to file my claim of Trespass, robbery, theft along
with all notices of false statement and rights, so i may press my claim as soon as possible;

i require you to write back so i know that you did or that some man or women contact me at
the above mailing location as soon as you do;
[1/4/2016 1:46:58 PM | Edited 1:49:10 PM] barbara novascotia: i guess it would be
interesting to understand why you did this notice up? what's it's purpose?
[1/4/2016 1:47:45 PM] barbara novascotia: i can see the intent. and it is way to long; and
why use statutes and codes, not even [ cf. ]
[1/4/2016 1:50:19 PM] barbara novascotia: i wish to forgive or be forgiven; which is it?

52 | P a g e

i, [a] man, aggrieved [party] / [counter] claimer, decree and require:

1. original-accuser / [counter] wrongdoer come face to face to press upon the record [viva
voce] under oath, or affirmation His first-hand necessary and proper:
(a ) true findings of facts;
(b ) points of law; and
(c ) nature of alleged wrong;
or forever hold Your peace;

so you can write up a mandamus requiring an officer or employee of the United States or
any agency thereof to compel said toss-pot to perform his duty to you the Claimant in the
event he doesn't wanna play ball
which means for those of you on US soil you don't even have to flip the court anymore
the court is after-all no one else's but the Claimant's as we've said all along
court means: [the] Aggrievedself/Claimant [Cf. person; status/capacity] and claim [Cf.
suit] of i, [a] man [Cf. sovereign] [Cf. 5 Black, Law. Dict. 318 (1979)];
Accused/Wrong Doer: (a) has no claim, (b) is part of Claimant s claim, (c) is [the]
Claimant's subject;
Claimant s claim comprises of all who are present;
all who are present are "Claimants subject(s)"/follower(s);

greetings bob,
firstly: i am in receipt of your interference in the matter concerning blah-blah and
i quote: "blah-blah, yada-yada..." (see attached Exhibit "A") as a direct result of
which i require you forward me verified details of your: (a ) status, (b )
capacity in relation to this matter as proof of your entitlement to have a say in
the matter and so that I may also be able to resolve the matter with you in
private, absence that which is required of you coupled with continuance of
interference without cause constitutes trespass;

Interpretation Act

PROPERTY AND CIVIL RIGHTS

Duality of legal traditions and application of provincial law

8.1 Both the common law and the civil law are equally authoritative and recognized
sources of the law of property and civil rights in Canada and, unless otherwise provided
by law, if in interpreting an enactment it is necessary to refer to a provinces rules,

53 | P a g e

principles or concepts forming part of the law of property and civil rights, reference
must be made to the rules, principles and concepts in force in the province at the time
the enactment is being applied
PART I
CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the

supremacy of God and the rule of law:

Matthew 6:24King James Version (KJV)

No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the
other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve
God and mammon.
24

[12/15/2015 7:53:39 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: absolutely

[12/15/2015 7:53:55 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: did u send it registered mail?
[12/15/2015 7:54:56 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: did u get the post master to time
stamp and make a copy for them... u keep the original
[12/15/2015 7:55:16 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: just put true copy and sign beside it
[12/15/2015 7:57:33 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: that way u can make a copy to
resend them a remider of the first letter u sent plus the registered receipt(make sure u dont
trash it :) ) with a follow up letter asking them to answer or they are in tacit agreement

Dear Leslie: greeting,

54 | P a g e

When did i ever give you permission to administer my property;

What evidence exists that you have my consent to use and enjoy my property;
What evidence exists that a man or woman came before i in open court, with a verifiable
claim to my property;
Are you aware that: i, a man did report a trespass; robbery; theft of my property,
Are you aware that: i, require my property restored immediately to i and only i;

Do as you wish, Leslie Martin, the property owner needs to be compensated at 700 per hour
every hour totaling 16,800 per day, every day the property is not restored, i will forward on
the bill to You today for the continued used and enjoyment of my property and on this same
day every week billed weekly;

i: [a] man
David
Leslie, greetings; i believe you are the woman who attempts to administrate my property
(see exhibit a, photo of dylan) without my consent; i require my property restored unto i post
haste or i require fair and just compensation for use of my property.

[cf. So, if asked to swear an oath in court, what should you do? " i object or show me the law
that states i must breach Gods Law Matthew 5 v33-36

I have refused oath and taken the affirmation in the Quaker tradition ,it was also the only
way the court would have recognised my actual appearance ! yes i did use the bible quotes .
They also refused my the right of affirmation or even any oath on the
adjournment ,.................totally private hearing . we live we learn .

John: 8. 10. When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto
her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee? 11. She said,
No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more. Bible Offline

55 | P a g e

"Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, 'You shall not swear falsely, but shall
perform your oaths to the Lord.' But I say to you, do not swear at all; neither by heaven, for
it is God's throne; nor by the earth, for it is His footstool; nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of
the great King. Nor shall you swear by your head, because you cannot make one hair white
or black. But let your 'Yes' be 'Yes,' and your 'No,' 'No.' For whatever is more than these is
from the evil one" (Matthew 5:33-37).
This is something i did for my old man for traffic court, but may give you some ideas. HO in
traffic court accepted it, even though prosecutor put up a fuss. I, a man say: On this 15th
day of October, two thousand fifteen, i a man, John, wish and with my own free will give
consent for Barbara, a woman with first hand knowledge [cf. Mark 10:7 "so they are no
longer two, but one flesh"], to present on my behalf at this Court; [Cf. Power of Attorney]
In the year 2015 of our lord
In court...
Judge: How do you plead?
Ross: I require pen and paper, and leave of court for 15 minutes to prepare my answer.
Judge: Granted.

NOTICE TO THE COURT

Firstly: i: [a] man; ross william ulbright, am not represented, do not represent myself, am
present.
Secondly: If any man/woman claim wrongdoing angainst me, i wish, order and demand that
man/woman present and verify his/her claim against me in open court of record.
Thirdly: If no man/woman verify claim against me, and/or;
Fourthly: if verified claim is not attached to me, then;
Fifthly: i require return of my property, and;
Sixthly: i require payment to me in the amount of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in
repayment for enslavement and involuntary servitude, by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Seventhly: i, say here, and will verify in open court, that all herein be true.

SIGNED
DATED

56 | P a g e

notice
Change of bond conditions
regarding: 'xxxxxxxxx'

i at one time believed it was in my best interest and a benefit to me to have the
USA along with its agents to attach this ankle bracelet upon my person. I am
sorry that I wasted everybodies time and government expenses to grant my wish
to have this placed on my person.

But at this time I know longer feel that it is a benefit to be under house arrest. I
wish for the United States or the people that place this upon my person to come
back and claim their property or I am going Take control of this property and I am
going to remove it from my person because it is trespassing upon my property
i, say here, and will verify in open court, that all herein be true.

signed

notice
cancel title
regarding: 'xxxxxxxx'

On this day, December 5, 2015, i: [a] man, Ross, hereby cancel all obligation to
the title of 'Defendant' or any such title, as i believe being so bound causes harm
to i, a man; i believe i am liable ONLY to my fellow man;
i wish to settle this matter out of court;
who says i do wrong?

i say all herein be true

------notice
idiot

57 | P a g e

regarding: 'xxxxxxxx'
i: [a] man, Ross, am an idiot to the Legal Society, its practices and procedures,
and the language of legal persons, Legalese, all of which i do not understand
i say all herein be true
------notice
not ready to proceed
regarding: 'xxxxxxxxx'
i: [a] man, Ross, am not ready to proceed; i require an additional 60 days to settle
this matter out of court
i say all herein be true
------notice
orders
regarding: 'xxxxxx'
Any man or woman who directs an order to i: a man, Ross, bears liability
i say all herein be true
----notice
representation
regarding: 'xxxxxxx'
Any man or woman who acts on behalf of i: [a] man, Ross, bears all liability
i say all herein be true

Dear Tracy;
u trespass by way of foot on mine and do cause harm---please remove said
trespass so I won't have to take further action for u to stop; PLEASE STOP;
God speed,
Big Al,
a man,

58 | P a g e

2015.

December 6,

[5:01 PM] Vital Rights "rei" [MA]:

<<< Greetings Boss Man
Thanks for your offer, put it in writing and send it.
Thanks

Tracy DATE XXXXVital Rights "rei" [MA], Today

5:01 PM(y)

Conusance
CONUSANCE, CLAIM OF, English law. This is defined to be an intervention by
a third person, demanding judicature in thecause against the plaintiff, who has chosen to co
mmence his action out of claimant's court. 2 Wilson's R. 409.
2. It is
a question of jurisdiction between the two courts Fortesc. R. 157; 5 Vin. Abr. 588; and not be
tween the plaintiff anddefendant, as
in the case of plea to the jurisdiction, and therefore it must be demanded by the party entitl
ed to conusance, or
byhis representative, and not by the defendant or his attorney. Id. ibid. A plea to the jurisdict
ion must be pleaded in person, but aclaim of conusance may be made by attorney. 1 Chit. Pl.
403.
3. There are three sorts of conusance. 1. Tentere placita, which does not oust another cou
rt of its jurisdiction, but onlycreates a concurrent one. 2. Cognitio placitorum, when the plea i
s commenced in one court, of which conusance belongs toanother. 3.
A conusance of exclusive jurisdiction; as that no other court shall hold pica, &c. Hard. 509 Ba
c. Ab. Courts, D.

Claim of Consuance..is when u have a common law suit before the court and they are talking
about tax codegive the man acting as a judge notice to bring it over the the right side of
the court

Claim of consonance

59 | P a g e

I demand that they respect the fact that this is a common law land and if they
dont like working in a common law land as a common law magistrate that i am
going to ask for your oath of office

1. claim intervention notice

2. claim intervention notice reminder
3. judgment
4. claim
sometiems inbetween 1. and 3. you might have
2. 1st claim intervention notice reminder
3. 2nd claim intervention notice reminder
4. 3rd claim intervention notice reminder
and maybe even up to 25th claim intervention notice reminder before you hit
them with the judgment
you hit them with the judment when all the previous communications have
provided you with all the info that will allow you to judge based on the facts
acquired as a result of all your past commnunicaitons
which in turn is what allows you to claim coz you've already won the case before
it's even began in court

but if you must take anything with you from what i just posted above it is this concept of the
point behind your claim intervention notices:
1. first time it's just a notice;
2. second time its a reminder which is not to be ignored but responded to;
3. third time Your failure to respond shows, on and for [my] superior court of record, that
there is a certainty that you have no proof contrary to the facts already presented to You for
Your undivided attention and judgement; hence the need for this judgment against You ;
judgement is You were incompetent to make the stupid order, and are now liable one million
% for any loss, harm, or injury, i might suffer as a result of Your insanity;
incompetency to put it politely... lol

60 | P a g e

and remember it is highly unlikely that you will resolve anything via these claim intervention
notices, as they will go right over their heads and even if in the unlikely event they should
comprehend your notices, they most certainly will not act like it and further comply to
anything you say or do, they will roll on as usual as per their corporate charter, and so the
only thing one should aim to achieve by these notices is to incriminate them, set traps for
them, marinate them prior to roasting them in open court, thats all;

Hi bobby,
i believe you, Bobby may wish to communicate an offer to i .
i require any Offer(s) to be in writing with a wet ink signature.

Thank you.
Kind regards,
Xoxox :-P

[12:38:17 PM] Julz: since i finished transcribing the counterclaim section of BTs seminar, ive
been thinking a lot about how i would write up a claim, one things become very-very useful
for me and that is to outsource a lot (that i wish to establish) over to the law of the case
section of my claim, so for example rather than burden the reader with too much right off
the bat, ive decided to use a similar technique they use when they want to add something
extra by way of introducing it as notes, at the bottom of the page, referenced by either a
number, or a letter, etc.
------------------------------------------------------------------i (1), Julian (2) (son of Virgil, son of Aurel, ...
son of Abraham), is: (a) one of the original peoples from the land (3), (b) the aggrievedparty/claimer (4) (hereinafter and before: counterplaintiff , or counterclaimant ) and at
this court of record (5) claim against each of the following: [a] man, Jon Doe and [a] woman,
Mary Roe (each hereinafter: Trespasser , or Wrongdoer and all collectively:
Trespassers , or Wrongdoers ); who are each summoned to answer counterclaimant in a
plea of: (a) trespass , (b) trespass on the case , to wit:
------------------------------------------------------------------so after they read the above ALMOST by the
books claim-intro, they can, if they wish, go to the bottom of the page to see why i put a
(1) after i and a (2) after my given name and so on and so forth... and the below is
what they will see... lol
------------------------------------------------------------------____________________
(1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6): See LAW OF THE CASE.
------------------------------------------------------------------and if theyre still intrigued, though theyre
most certainly not obliged by me to go the extra mile, even though its at their own risk if

61 | P a g e

they dont, then they can go to the section of the claim called the law of the case where the
below is what they will see... (lol)
-----------------------------------------------------------------LAW OF THE CASE
exhibits "P", "Q", "R", "S" and "T" are integrated and included by reference as though
completely stated and visible herein;
------------------------------------------------------------------now as you know, you can have as many
exhibits as you want and as fooking long as you want each one of them to be and it doesnt
affect the size of your claim and you can woffle on in there about every fucking law in the
universe that you wish to decree... (lol) so if and when they do make it to their last
destination/the law of the case exhibit(s), to finally satisfy their curiousity, the below is the
first thing theyll see, followed by...:
-----------------------------------------------------------------EXHIBIT P
the law of the case, as well as the meaning of the words used in this case, are decreed as
follows, thusly; let it be said, let it be done, and none may add to, nor take away from, what
is decreed and expressed herein which renders silent that which is implied, assumed, or
presumed [Cf. Expressum facit cessare tacitum. That which is expressed makes that which is
implied to cease. Where a law sets down plainly its whole meaning the court is prevented
from making it mean what the court pleases. Munro v. City of Albuquerque, 48 N.M. 306,
150 P.2d 733-4 [Emphasis added]];

(1) i : a mere (a) man (b), my own master (c) among mankind and son and heir of Gd
through Christ (d ), who can serve two masters NOT, for as it is written: No man can serve
two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the
one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. Matthew 6:24, KJV (1611);
No man can serve two masters: for either he shall hate the one, and love the other, or else
he shall lean to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and riches. Matthew
6:24, Geneva Bible (1599);
(a) mere: nothing less than, complete as one, entire. total, absolute, pure, true, real and
genuine
(b) man: a sacred union between consciousness (spirit) and flesh-and-blood (body), both
of which were created by the creator of all, the sound of which in the standard English
language is commonly translated as God, who is sovereign Lrd of the universe who made
and governs all things by his almighty power and infinite wisdom;
(c) my own master among mankind: not above, nor below, but equal to every man;
(d ) son and heir of Gd through Christ: And if children, then heirs; heirs of Gd, and jointheirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him , that we may be also glorified together

62 | P a g e

Romans 8:17, KJV (1611); Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son,
then an heir of Gd through Christ Galatians 4:7, KJV (1611) [Emphasis added];

(2) Julian: is (as a matter of fact) my one and only given-name, as a result of which i
consent to be addressed by an additional name NOT; 3655. knh, kaw-naw; a prim. root;
to address by an additional name; hence, to eulogize: give flattering titles, surname
(himself). James Strongs Exhaustive Concordance of The Bible 56 [of the Dictionary of the
Hebrew Bible therein] (1890); an eulogy is a set oration for the deceased and since i am
deceased NOT, i consent to my given-name being eulogised NOT; When a man is made a
spiritual peer he loses his surname ; when a temporal, his christian-name 2 The Compact
Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary ; 1 The Select Works of Jonathan Swift 300 (1823); i
will not now accept the person of man [Cf. legal person], neither will i give titles [Cf.
surnames] to man, For i may not give titles, lest my Maker should take me away suddenly
Job 32:21-22, Geneva Bible (1599); Let me not, i pray you, accept any mans person [Cf.
legal person], neither let me give flattering titles [Cf. surnames] unto man, i know not to give
flattering titles; in so doing my maker would soon take me away Job 32:21-22, KJV (1611);
And the Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory: and thou shalt be
called by a new name, which the mouth of the Lrd shall name Isaiah 62:2, KJV (1611)
[Emphasis added];
------------------------------------------------------------------and after that the meaning of the below
[12:39:11 PM] Julz: one of the original peoples from the land (3)will be decreed/clarified
and then the same for the below
[12:39 PM] Julz:

<<< the aggrieved-party/claimer (4)and then the below

[12:39 PM] Julz:

<<< court of record (5)and so on and so forth... and thusly ill get to say whatever the fuck
i want without saying it at first glance that is, if you see where im going with this, so that
way i wont raise any alarm bells right off the bat and potentially go under the radar more or
less undetected as a freeman type, or whatever lunatic, blah-blah, yada-yada;

G'day bob,
I believe, you bob issued this 'ticket' in error, please find enclosed herein.

63 | P a g e

I believe this settles the matter.

Thank you.

Kind regards,
Signature

I received a notice from the court that I will be charged a civil assessment fee of $300 if I do
not pay by November 21st.

Dear Michael,

i, Levi, a man write to You: the man who sometime acts as Court Clerk. In regards to case
number xxxxccccxxxx . i require the name and address of the man who says i owe to him a
debt which is true do and owe. It is my wish to settle the matter and stay in honor (see
attached). I require your response in 7 days.

continuation to the below:

i,
[a] man,
Aggrieved-party/Claimer [Cf. Counterclaimant],
decree and require:
1. Original Accuser [Cf. Counterdefendant]
come face to face
to press upon the record [viva voce ]
under oath, or affirmation

64 | P a g e

His first hand necessary and proper:

(a) true findings of facts;
(b) points of law; and
(c) nature of alleged wrong;
or forever hold Your peace;
it is truly astonishing when you think about it properly that if they were to abide by that
which is the law no less, 95% of all cases would die right there and then, so i guess your only
job is to compel them to abide by the law, or play by their rules;
[Wednesday, November 11, 2015 2:55 PM] Spike :

<<< JZ, once you point that out to them, think they are going to have a change of heart?
Are there in most court cases 2 courts running at the same time? Their inferior
administrative court and yours, court of record?Spike , Wednesday 2:55 PM
titles don't rule so it really doesn't matter if you call yourself Plaintiff/Chief Prosecutor in
your case caption so long as within the body of your claim you specify you are the
Aggrieved-party/Claimer (hereinafter and before Plaintiff/Countercomplainant/Chief
Prosecutor ) after which you can refer to yourself as Plaintiff , or Countercomplainant , or
Chief Prosecutor all throughout your entire claim because that now stands for Aggrievedparty/Claimer and nothing else; though ive mentioned this before i find myself needing to
mention it again: im not a fan of words such as Executor , or Prosecutor , or any other
words ending with or , because those words are describing a mans actions NOT, unlike
words with an er ending, such as Executer , Claimer [for which reason Claimant, or
Plaintiff though not ending with or can equally be taken for a legalese word], fire fighter,
baker etc. which [unlike the former] are words that describe what a man does [as opposed to
pretends to be], i.e. performs some executive functions, or claims something, or puts out
fires, or bakes something, etc., or ending words do not describe a mans actions, instead
they represent legal entities especially for us who are into law;
see for yourselves at the following links
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=-er&allowed_in_frame=0
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?
allowed_in_frame=0&search=promoter&searchmode=none where you will find an
interesting explanation which goes into the difference between er and or suffix use, i.e.
Prosecutor v. Prosecuter , or Executor v. Executer , the first being legalese/name of a legal
entity, whilst the second is saying that a man performs some executive, or prosecuting
functions, which in my books is a huge difference aside from the fact that to be the
Aggrieved-party/Claimer pisses all over Plaintiff/Chief Prosecutor , or even Prosecuter : -er
The use of -or and -ee in legal language (such as lessor/lessee) to distinguish actors and
recipients of action has given the -or ending a tinge of professionalism, and this makes it
useful in doubling words that have a professional and a non-professional sense (such as

65 | P a g e

advisor/adviser, conductor/conducter, incubator/incubater, elevator/elevater); so there you

have it folks: Claimer , or even Prosecuter , do not pertain to legal competency like
Claimant/Complainant/Plaintiff , or Prosecutor do.

Hi Joe
I wish to bring attention to the fact that my initial contact with the office at
which you. Joe, act as Managing Director of , has still not attended to my question some 16
months later. Joe, you do understand that every man/woman working at that office is acting
in the position of a public servant, which I believe are trustees of the people.
Government was formed by man to secure and protect the property of man. Joe, i suggest
you read all the correspondence sent to subordinate members of the staff by i, a man. i do
not have a title. i am just a man that owns property.
i also wish to remind you Joe, that
the terms of the payment plan mentioned, is conditional. Up to this point of time, the
condition has not been met. Joe, you also mention a sum which includes an amount for
fulfilling an order that was not issued by i. Despite repeatedly requiring Chrisxxxxxxxxxxx to
forward on to i the name of the man/woman who issued the order (and breeched the duties,
obligations and responsibilities of a public servant, therefore causing harm to i, a man,) so i
can bill him/her, Chris has not supplied it.
Joe, you also mention the following [ the debt
that you owe to xxxxxxxxxxxxx] This may be the breakthrough i have been requiring, if you,
Joe believe a debt is owed by i, a man,would you Joe, kindly write it in the form of a bill of
particulars, sign it and send to i , or if you, Joe still believe a debt is owing by i, but can't
send a bill of particulars, just write in in the form of an order, sign it and send to i.
Joe,
it also appears that a threat has been communicated by writing [ if you fail to make
your..........................................will be restricted and your account placed into debt
collection]
and signed it.
If you, Joe still believe you have authority over i, a man,
i require you, Joe , to show me the law that you. Joe , are relying on for your determination.
A fellow man,

or; "Hi Joe:

i have not yet received an answer to the letter i wrote to you, Joe on the XXth XXXX, 201X
please find a copy enclosed herein."

Dear Joe; I, a man , Allan, believe you act as Managing Director at such n such; I, did send a
question some time ago with no response; enclosed is a copy of said letter-I wish for you to
reply in a timely manner;-------------------g0d speed----Dear Joe; I have yet to receive any communication back from u; is it not the policy of each
man and woman of this office to serve the public? enclosed is the original letter I sent 12
years ago; I will be looking forward to your response;

then start trimming right back your written verbage.

66 | P a g e

i'm shouted at for writing 3 sentences in a letter :P hahaha. not sure what would happen
with a essay :) lol.

i can accept NOT any: (a) privileges, (c) benefits, or (c) advantages, that You may
offer i, as such injure i, furthermore, i, [a] man, know of no law that can compel i to accept
such;

[Saturday, October 24, 2015 10:12 AM] Dead Beat Dads:

<<< i was under the impression it was one claim and several causes of actionDead Beat
Dads, Saturday, October 24, 2015 10:12 AMA CLAIM CONSISTS OF:

CAPTION

PARTIES

CLAIMS

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION TRESPASS

INTRODUCITON/TESTIMONY
SPECIFICS

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION TRESPASS ON THE CASE

this is where we can stop the testimony and start our argument based upon the true findings
of facts and points of law integrated by our laws of the case

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION TRESPASS ON THE CASE

67 | P a g e

VICARIOUS LIABILITY [if applicable]

LAW OF THE CASE

Exhibits "A", "B", "C", "D" and "E" are integrated and included by reference as though
completely stated and visible herein;

LAWFUL RESOLUTION
If you've been summonsed to court, tell him you'll be more than happy to show up and listen
to him complain, but you are going to require compensation, as you really don't have time to
take off work and listen to someone complain about your possession of marijuana, but if he
were to file an actual claim using his name vs you, then you'll be more than happy to show
up free of charge and attempt to settle the dispute or compensate him for any harm your
possession of marijuana may have caused him.
Remember folks: America is a Common Law Nation, and unless you have actually harmed
another man or his property, no actual LAW has been broken.
PS: If they stole your marijuana (trespassed by way of theft), then file a claim requiring the
immediate restoration of your Property, and require $1.00/second from the commencement
of the crime until your property is restored.

'i: a man; claim bob jones trespass by way of filing false claims against me; interfering with
my rights; extortion; barratry; unjust enrichment; i require compensation of two hundredfifty thousand dollars; i require a court of record; i require a trial by jury; i say here, and will
verify in open court, all herein be true - john doe'.

They have no case

Edit: As of November 2, 2015 the Notice has been successful at making 6 cases vanish from
Pacer without a trace - gone - poof - never happened.
Anytime a prosecuting attorney is bringing charges against you for anything pertaining to a
code or statute violation such as those found in US Codes or State Statutes, he is operating
under thepresumption that you are one of that corporation's own internal employees who

68 | P a g e

is contractually obligated to abide by those internal statutes. It is a con, and they make
billions of dollars every year off of unsuspecting Americans because we don't know the
difference between a criminalcomplaint and an actual claim.
I explain this in more detail here:
http://popularliberty.com/9380/2nd-amendment-isnt-under-attack-you-just-...
And here:
http://popularliberty.com/2207/im-facing-5-years-possession-marijuana-wh...
If you are not employed by that corporation, such as the 'IRS', or the 'CITY OF GALVESTON',
or the 'STATE OF TEXAS', or the 'UNITED STATES', and being compensated to abide by that
corporation's internal rules/codes/statutes/regulations, they simply do not apply to you, as
Slavery and Involuntary Servitude are against the Law on American soil (see Amendment
XIII), and no man may compel performance (force him to abide by internal corporate
statutes) from another man, without fairly and justly compensating that man for his
performance.
Gov't employees have signed into an employment contract to hold those gov't jobs, and
they are being compensated to abide by that corporation's internal statutes, but you and I
are not, therefore, they simply do not apply to us.
Yes, it is a nationwide con that has been ongoing for years. It is how they control society
under corporate statutes; it is how they interfere with your Rights; it is how they make
billions of dollars due to our ignorance of the Law; it is how they incarcerate us for victimless
crimes where there is no injured party.
Anytime a prosecutor brings forth a criminal complaint against you, it reads like this:
STATE OF TEXAS vs John Q. Public [illegal possession of cannabis oil, marijuana, automatic
weapons, etc.]
If he had an actual claim, it would read like this:
Bob T. Jones II vs John Q. Public (Bob being the prosecutor himself in his capacity as a man).
He's filing a complaint on behalf of some entity that goes by that name (STATE OF TEXAS),
but he has no verifiable claim because nothing you may have done harmed HIM or his
property, and he cannot produce his Plaintiff to point you out across the courtroom and say,

69 | P a g e

"That man sitting right over there caused me harm by his failure to file an income tax form,
or his failure to obtain a concealed carry permit, or his possession of cannabis oil, etc."
He's only complaining, because gov't cannot bring forth actual claims against man because
man created gov't. All they can do is complain if you are not an employee of that agency
who is being compensated to abide by that agencies internal-corporate statutes. But
his complaints are causing you harm; they are harming your good name within your
community; they are depriving you of your property without due process of law, and they
are wasting your very valuable time, money, and resources having to deal with
a complaint that no one can take the stand and verify in open court.
Therefore, the prosecutor is filing false claims against his fellow man, and that is an unlawful
act in which he most certainly can be held accountable.
To use this Notice in an existing case,
Just replace 'STATE OF TEXAS' with 'IRS' or 'CITY OF GALVESTON', or 'CHILD PROTECTIVE
SERVICES', or 'UNITED STATES', etc. depending on your specific situation. If there is no
property involved and it's just some prosecutor attempting to bring you up on criminal
complaint for something (anything), just take out the parts having to do with property.
Handwrite the Notice and make COPIES of the Notice. You'll want to enter a COPY into the
prosecutor's case, not the original, as doing so would be surrendering your property to the
court. You want to keep the original so they cannot alter it in any way shape or form. The
only body that may hold and verify the original would be a Jury of your Peers. You have to be
very vigilant in protecting your property (claims and notices) when dealing with these courts
and prosecutors; if they can change or alter it in anyway to get themselves off the hook, bet
your ass they will do just that. Protect yourself and only enter a COPY into their case so they
know you still possess the original if they decide to trespass on your property by altering it in
any way-shape or form.
Remember: America is STILL a Common Law Nation (as is Canada, England, Australia, and a
few others). Common Law is unwritten Law - It is nowhere to be found in
codes/statutes/rules/regulations. Basically, you can do anything you damned well please as
long as you are not harming your fellow man or his property, and you have the right to face
your accuser (see Article VI) and settle with him on the private side before it goes public if
for some reason you DO trespass on your fellow [wo]man.
Therefore,
If the prosecutor is stating the 'IRS', or the 'STATE OF IDAHO', etc. is the Plaintiff, then make
the Son-of-a-Bitch put his Plaintiff on the witness stand so you may cross examine him and

70 | P a g e

compensate him for any harm you may have caused him or his personal property by your
failure to file paperwork, or failure to obtain a concealed carry permit, or failure to obtain a
Class III weapons tax stamp, or possession of marijuana, etc. If he can't produce the Plaintiff
(the Plaintiff MUST Appear), then sue his ass for filing false claims against you and take his
house or retirement fund. Someone (a living wo[man]) has to show up and verify the harm.
Here is the Notice:
" i: a man; require the STATE OF TEXAS to show up and verify his/her claim against me so i
may cross examine my accuser (the plaintiff must appear) and compensate him/her for any
harm i may have caused. If this man/woman that goes by the name 'STATE OF TEXAS'
cannot show up to verify his/her claim, i require this matter immediately discharged. It is my
belief there is no man/woman named 'STATE OF TEXAS' who can verify this claim by uttering
with his/her voice I've done wrong or caused him/her personal harm, injury, or loss, therefore
pressing it upon the record in open court. It is also my belief, that someone is filing
complaints (false claims) on behalf of this entity known as the 'STATE OF TEXAS' in an
attempt to unjustly enrich themselves and the 'STATE OF TEXAS' (whoever those individuals
may be) and deprive me of my property without due process of law. If this matter is not
immediately discharged, i will be requiring leave of court so i may bring a proper and
verifiable claim before the court to address this trespass against me in the proper venue-a
court of record (trespasses being: filing false claims, barratry, malicious prosecution, unjust
enrichment, theft, robbery, etc.), in which i will be requiring compensation for the trespasses
and wasting my valuable time, money, and resources having to deal with this complaint, as i
do not have time to answer complaints without compensation at this time. If there is an
actual verifiable claim before the court, i will be more than happy to show up free of charge
and address any proper and verifiable claim against me. i also require and order the
immediate restoration of my property (see Exhibit A) and one dollar per second from the
commencement of the crime till my property is restored - your name here.'
Note: If there is no theft/robbery of property involved, just leave that out of the Notice.
Property is anything you enjoy exclusive Right to. If it is a CPS case involving children, you
use the wordproperty, not 'children'. The STATE has no control over property, but they do
have control over words they use in their statutes such as 'child', 'infant', 'children', 'motor
vehicle', 'marijuana', 'automatic weapons', 'firearms', 'land', 'homes', 'bicycles', etc.
You always want to use that word 'property', period! And 'Exhibit A' should be a photo
of the property attached to the back of your Notice; a photocopy of that property is fine.
Either someone can show up and VERIFY the claim by pressing it upon the record in open
court, or there is no case, period. The prosecutor cannot verify the claim because he has no
first hand knowledge, and nothing you may have done caused harm, injury, or loss to
himself or his property.

71 | P a g e

Simply put, he's filing false claims to unjustly enrich himself, and this entity known as the
'STATE OF TEXAS', or 'IRS', or 'UNITED STATES', etc. You're letting the man/woman who's
prosecuting this case against you know, that if they don't discharge this nonsense before the
next hearing, you are going to stop the next hearing in its tracks by saying "i require leave
of court so I may bring a proper and verifiable claim against YOU for filing false
claims against me, and I will be requiring compensation for the trespasses.
Your claim supercedes his silly complaint. You can verify your claim, but he cannot verify the
complaint, as he himself has no first hand knowledge, and nothing you may have done
caused harm, injury, or loss to himself or his property, and he cannot produce his Plaintiff
because there is no man named 'STATE OF TEXAS' who can take the stand and verify the
complaint, either.
Court is a place for man to settle claims, not complaints.
You'll want to enter that Notice into an existing case they have against you. If the prosecutor
doesn't discharge/dismiss the case after reading that Notice, he's calling your bluff. When
you get to the hearing, simply keep your mouth shut and keep referring the judge back to
your Notice anytime he's asks you questions because he's more than likely trying to pull you
out of the Common Law and back into their jurisdiction (control).
If they insist on continuing or ignoring you, then do what you said you would do in the Notice
and REQUIRE (to demand by right and by authority) leave of court for a few days so you can
perfect your actual claim against the prosecutor and drag his ass into court as a defendant
for filing false claims against you. Because the compensation you will be requiring for the
trespass shall exceed twenty dollars, you'll be able to drag him into a trial by jury (see
Article VII) as a defendant for filing false claims against you that no Plaintiff showed up to
verify.
Make sure u serve it upon the wrongdoer and give them 21 days to respond you take your
claim and proff of delivery and give it to the court clerk and then both of you can have your
trial on the same day21 days from then...together running parallel.
If a prosecutor is claiming the 'UNITED STATES' is the Plaintiff in his suit against you, then for
the love of God make him produce his Plaintiff so you may cross examine your accuser.
Article VI guarantees you that right (that Right predates the Constitution). He can't produce
the Plaintiff, because the 'UNITED STATES' is not a living man who can utter with his voice
you've done wrong and caused him personal harm, injury, or loss ..... and this is how you call
them out on it and hold them personally accountable for filing false claims against you.

72 | P a g e

[3:40:12
[3:40:22
[3:40:32
[3:40:46
[3:41:04
[3:41:27

PM]
PM]
PM]
PM]
PM]
PM]

He
He
He
He
He
He

isn't
isn't
isn't
isn't
isn't
isn't

my
my
my
my
my
my

Prime
Prime
Prime
Prime
Prime
Prime

Minister...lol:
Minister...lol:
Minister...lol:
Minister...lol:
Minister...lol:
Minister...lol:

your is not i
it your property
its your property
respond
no that property belongs to i....
your is legally tying the person to you

God and owndership. God gives land to a people FOR A POSSESSION, or FOR AN
INHERITANCE.
the meek shall INHERIT the earth
professor-profess-to be received into a religious order, confess
professional
all these words related to teachers have eclesiastical origins
doctor-religious teacher/adviser/scholar
MD-medicinae doctor-teacher of medicine
PhD-doctor of philosophy-teacher of philosophy

Example letter i sent u a correspondence and i havent heard back from you. Are you in
possession of the correspondence? Maybe the correspondence was lost or delay in the mail.
Here is a copy, would you please call or text me at (insert phone number) and let me know
that you are in receive of this correspondence. I wish you well and god bless, joe
We consented to have ankle bracelets on us!!! So dont threaten them!!! They didnt do
anything we did!!
U modify the order!! thank you so much for putting this ankle bracelet on me! Its a lovely
ankle bracelet and i think it probably cost a lot of money to do such a wonderful product. At
the time i had it placed on me to see my family as the terms and condition of my release.
Now that i look back at it, that now this hurts my ankle and i realized that this glorious
government would never do anything to cause harm to man. Can you please come up with
an alternative solution or product that would not be a detriment to man. Kind regards and
have a blessed day

Bxoing in on your letter implies notihgn in it can be alteredplus if you have multiple boxes
u in essence are looking at several different pieces of paper

73 | P a g e

Jurisdicition is IN thats why we are ATcourt

We dont live IN Canada we live upon the ground of a socialized society called Canada and
that society agrees to congregate together and support and protect each others property.

<<< when i signed something by mistake, i sent a notice of mistake along with the copy of
the doc with "Signature Rescinded" and the date written on the doc....and signature crossed
outrobinz, Today 12:23 PM
1
The majority's reliance on Callahan v. Woods, 736 F.2d 1269 (9th Cir.1984) is, it seems to
me, not well taken. The objection on religious grounds in that case was to the requirement of
obtaining a Social Security number in order to receive public assistance benefits. No
alternative was provided to that requirement
2
Neither of the statements approved by the majority satisfies an important purpose of
requiring oath or affirmation, i.e., to insure that the witness makes a conscious commitment
to tell the truth. (See Looper, supra; Wilcoxon v. United States, 231 F.2d 384, at 387 (10th
Cir.1956), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 943, 76 S.Ct. 834, 100 L.Ed. 1469 (1957); A Reconsideration
of the Sworn Testimony Requirement: Securing Truth in the Twentieth Century, 75 Mich.L.R.
1681 (1977).) To say that "I understand that I must tell the truth" or that "I understand I
must accurately state the facts" is not a promise to tell the truth nor accurately to state the
facts. Appellant was aware of this as shown by his statements at oral argument that
".... Now the scripture says 'Let God be true though every man be a liar.' I'm simply saying
that since we've all lied in the past and we've lied once or twice today and we're going to lie
in the future, why kid ourselves by saying we tell the truth when in fact we do not. It's my
position I would be guilty of perjury the moment I said 'Do you swear to tell the truth, the
whole truth and nothing but the truth so help you God' and I say 'I do' I'm committing a lie."
3
The majority treats the trial court's action as an abuse of discretion relating to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
which provides for sanctions. The question in this case relates to the interpretation of
Fed.R.Civ.P. 43(d) which provides for affirmation. Even if the trial court erred, that would be
reversible as an error of law, not an abuse of discretion. The majority, by accepting
alternative language as complying with Rule 43(d), imposes no sanction. It simply holds
there is no basis for any sanction so long as appellant accepts the language approved by the
majority

Basics of letter writing, and mail fraud

74 | P a g e

The first letter is verifying that you are writting to the right man or woman.. the whole
process of letter writing is too get a man or woman to be accountable
First letter should go something like
Are you the man or woman i am to communicate with about the matter or is there another
man or woman i should talk too about this matter?
once you have the right man or woman then you tell then they are causing you harm..
if they continue beyond this ..then you give them the fair warning letter that if they continue
you that you will seek a remedy for this situation then when they cross the line you send
them a process server with a cease and decist notice
Write the notice to the head of the agency
dear bob greeetings,
I know you are a man and that you are in charge of this agency and your failure to properly
train and discipline your employees is causing i a man harm i require you to cease and
desist..
thanks,
robin
and if they continue file a claim..

how does he want to be addressed? With his full name john j paul..should it be john james
paul?

1jazzyred@gmail.com

Sec 1712 deals with falsification..

Take the metered mail and and get the serial number..then go to the post master and ask
how for them to look up how much money was on the account the day before the letter was
mailed to me..if there is no money on the account its mail fraud.. as it must be paid
postage
if the letter that isnt cancelled ( 6 lines going through the stamp that means it went through
the postal service) and you make a copy of itshow the evidence of it then open the
uncancelled first class letter read it..
then send the letter back with a stamp and that will cancel the letter..then make a copy of
that for evidence

75 | P a g e

then send the this all back to them and say can you spell mail fraud?
this should let you alone

Basics of letter writing

Stay away from ED and ING ur not writing i am writing to you.. but rather u writei write
to you.
i made a delivery upon you
he answers for you
Not response.because a response can be a silly look and and answer is verbal..

Date should be written 27th april 2014,

- Learn how to "paper and pen-up"

The chinesse refused to have any contracts written by the united states attorneys in
anything or than present tense because they were getting burned with contract saying we
will paying you $10,000,000 when you ship 10 million tvs because the usa were taking the
position that they will be PAYING because its in the future tense. So they will always be in
the future.
Same game with your mom when u say tomorrow ill mow the lawn and tomorrow never
comes..
Present tense is key to writing!!
Judges dont have guns ..they just have words and they are word nerds!! Be prepared to
have tight language

76 | P a g e

If you in an administrative courtI will appear only if done under oath or affirmation and
anybody else who is going to enter any information, evidence or facts must also put it in the
form of oath or affirmation so that it may be available for appellate review
Guess who isnt going to be able to enter anything into the record? LAWYERS!!!

Giving the other side a loophole by using improper grammar

U dont want your property returned because RETURNED the ED makes it something in
the past.. state it i want the immediate RETURN of property

Their position is sorry it cant be returned and hold fast because they cant time travel to fill
your order!! Hence its impossible and can be denied..

What to do when the other side hides behind their secretary

So they are pretending they didnt get your process serves notice because the secretary go
it.. well what we do is we write her a letter asking her if she gave the letter to the proper
man and if she ignores then you file a claim.. this will make say she handed them the
envelop right away and ping go you flushed the hiding man into to liable open!!

Where to send your letters

Send a communication in the written form and u send it using a process server. Send the
letter to the man not to his attorney unless he stipulates.. u could write that if you do not
wish to communicate with me any further because u have retained proper and competent
counsel. If so please forward this on to your attorney and all correspondence will go through
him so as to not be a bother to you..

77 | P a g e

Be polite as you go after a cop and this keep the communication short so as to not be seen
as stalking a police officer..

Understanding fraud, and how to write a lawsuit

1. Constructive fraud is a legal fiction describing a situation where a person or entity gained
an unfair advantage over another by deceitful or unfair methods. Intent does not need to be
shown as in the case of actual fraud.
fraud in the inducement
n. the use of deceit or trick to cause someone to act to his/her disadvantage, such as signing
an agreement or deeding away real property. The heart of this type of fraud is misleading
the other party as to the facts upon which he/she will base his/her decision to act. Example:
"there will be tax advantages to you if you let me take title to your property," or "you don't
have to read the rest of the contract--it is just routine legal language" but actually includes a
balloon payment.
Fraud in Factum / Fraud in Making Law & Legal Definition
Fraud in factum is a type of fraud that occurs when misrepresentation causes one to enter
into a transaction without accurately realizing the risks, duties, or obligations incurred. Fraud
in factum occurs when a legal instrument actually executed differs from the one intended for
execution by the person who executes it as s/he is induced to sign the instrument without
reasonable opportunity to learn of its fraudulent character or essential terms. For example, a
blind person signing a mortgage when misleadingly told that it is just a letter. Generally,
fraud in the factum voids the instrument under state law and is a real defense against even
a holder in due course.
Fraud in factum is also termed as fraud in the execution or fraud in the making.

If Im on your foot, Im trespassing; if Im in your footits a miracle; if Im standing at

your foot, Im beside you; if Im standing over your foot, Im considered a threat; if Im
standing under your foot, you have control over me and might be hurting me.

So we want to be IN our court, and AT their building.

We can be operating IN law as long as its OUR OWN law, as long as WE CREATE OUR OWN
LAWS. Ill accept some benefits and Ill not accept some other benefits. These are benefits
from my forefathers, you trustee, just hand me the trust the assets the forefathers (the
trustor/grantor) created for me, you cant hold me obligated to a gift. Just because Im a

78 | P a g e

beneficiary of social security, doesnt mean Im obligated to compensate for the gift. Why
would he establish this gift for me if it was an obligation?

c.f.When a man says he is building a house for himself and his posterity, he does not mean
to be understood as saying that he has any thought of binding them, nor is it to be inferred
that he [*5] is so foolish as to imagine that he has any right or power to bind them, to live in
it. So far as they are concerned, he only means to be understood as saying that his hopes
and motives, in building it, are that they, or at least some of them, may find it for their
happiness to live in it. -Lysander Spooner, No Treason.

Mother IN law, not AT law. Because wife and husband created law by marriage contract. We
are in a marriage contract, that makes the spouses mother and father IN laws. Were IN,
embraced, in the law.

No lawyers are allowed IN, theyre AT law. They cannot be party-to the law.
A void judgement never existed.
I want void judgement be careful with this, it means we want to void ALL the items on the
judgement void.
I.E. when someone wants to regain custody of kids, their judgement for custody is lumped
together with divorce. When they void the judgement for custody, they also void the divorce.

SEPARATE all our orders into different judgements so we dont run into this problem.

When were in common law we place the orders, not the guy in black.
Call the guy in black dress magistrate [judge]. Because in the common law court we just
want him to sit back and say he witnessed the event, take the rendering from the jury/the
verdict, to the district court clerks office, let her stamp it and say that he witnessed it this is
true verdict from the jury, this is the true bill they handed down, and this is what all parties
are supposed to get, and forever hold your peace, no appeals.

79 | P a g e

The more words used, the more limited the subject becomes. We narrow it down by talking
more.

First notice them

Then a cease and desist
Then i give them the order(what this is going to cost)
Then i hand them the bill
( if they want particulars they can ask i dont offer it overtly)

- The proper use of words

Most important common law words are in, at, on, for, upon, things having to do with
location.
in means contained, being under the jurisdiction of the container. Im nowhere else except
being in my body.
on if we are on something that doesnt belong to us, we are trespassing.
at is near to it, close to it, but not trespassing.
upon something implies an aggressive approach, its a form of attack.
Any trespass upon I a man and my person and property etc.

The last word is the subject, the word before it is the modifier.

80 | P a g e

- Karl's fair warning letter

I (name) give no entity the right to administrate my property; I say that (car/kid etc) is my
property; I say that no man or woman is will make a claim saying my claim is untrue; I want
my property returned to me; said property is to be totally under my control post haste within
(time limit); I will charge the wrongful holder of said property X amount of dollars for every
(day/minute) said property is not returned starting on the twenty-second day after theyve
received this summons and this suit, see attached claim.

21 days are there to try to settle the matter.

Using cf. "compare to" in your court documents

[cf.] The abbreviation cf. derives from the Latin word confer, while in English it is commonly
read as "compare". The abbreviation advises readers to consult other material, usually for
the purpose of drawing a contrast.

- If someone sending you a bill is off by one penny, it's extortion and fraud
Someone sends a bills for $15000 in damages.. the perfect number is a clue that its wrong,
possible extortion and fraud.. if they are of by one penny this is called extortion and fraud
because they are asking for a debt to be paid that is not due. Extortion because its not and
fraud because its not real..

one should right a letter to them ask 1. Where is the itemized bill of particulars
they should send u an exact bill something like $8873.93 is more likely to be seen as its not
a round even $15,000
this exposes that they committed both crimes

81 | P a g e

write a letter thank you for you timely response under Virginia code blah blha blha you
committed extortion and under code blalblah blah you committed fraud . because the first
bill you sent me $15000 and the second bills says this is absolutely proof of extortion and
fraud and anytime you would like to go before any court in Virginia we would be more than
glad to place it before a coomon law court of record trial by jury where we will submit our
own claim for $60000. So if theire is any more correspondence between that you would like i
leave up to you to let us know..
u may not here back from them forever..

The use of i in letters

When we get a summons send a letter saying whos the man or woman whos requiring I to
appear?
The next letter they send is you must appear
We send maybe you didnt get my first communication but I clearly said I to appear I never
used the word you see exhibit A the previous attached communication between you and I
and it clearly stipulates that Im an I and not a you.

- The three notice process does not apply in common law

The admin process is a waste of time if you dont have time!!
The only thing one should care about is the immediate restoration of the property.
Its your child.. file your claim immediately.. judges will snap right up when u report a
robbery in your claim..every agency is supposed to secure and protect property
Like for instance your child. And child services.. you dont wait for their court to convene you
create your own court on writing and put it before the and there u go your court is created
as soon as u get a stamp from the clerk the whole world takes notices that your court
exist..it will be days before you get ur kids back because they have to report a robbery for
liability reasons

82 | P a g e

How to write a letter when they wont respond in writing

if an attorney does not do anything in writing then say good..i need that in writing that you
dont do anything is writing signed and sent to me..
It is customary practice around this world to do things in writing and make sure things like
they are going to do anything about it respond back with who is this THEY and what is
the it she or he is refferring to?
Make them do everything by the letter of the law. Make them do it by the book words in
the air take wind..

One must know exactly what the it thethey the you and the i is

How to write a return letter to an agency

Say a game warden is sending you letters to get rid of your chickens in city limits and they
are identifying themselves as agent 10 write back stating that they have a strange name
or do you have a real name? and then add i dont know what u want me to do but I would
be glad to take your order.
but u got to sound like an stupid fool to draw out their name so you can give him a bill.
so when he gives you an order send him a bill for $1000 a chicken and the veterinary bill for
the next 3 years

One man order another man to do something with his property must be justly compensated.
get the name and the order from these Agents 10 folks

MSO and proof of financial responsibility

The reason we dont worry about who has the MSO, is because no one in the state is gonna
be able to come into any court and claim that our car has something to do with them.

Write to prosecution and ask 3 questions:

are you making a claim to my property?

83 | P a g e

are you making a claim that I owe a debt?

do you believe I owe a debt to you?

. Upper and lower case i

Capitalizing the I is diminishing your capacity by decapitating the dot of the i in I ..i am
mannot I a manbig dif

Sample letters
Is there a claim in Court? Is there a man to verify that claim?
My contention is both the man and the person are here. Before we begin I require
the Court establishes jurisdiction over the man.
Is there anything you don't understand?
Any consent implied or given is rescinded.

After receiving a traffic ticket or summons

Send letter to man acting as cop asking forgiveness IF he has suffered due to
your actions, and offer to compensate for any loss. (that removes controversy)
Jordan Guttuso
c/o 10 High Street
Butler New Jersey 07405

Greetings Jordan,
I wish to ask forgiveness for any harm you may have suffered as a result of my actions on
March 8th, 2015.
If you had any financial loss, please let me know.
Kind regards,
Ronald Karl Portz II

84 | P a g e

548 Glen Road

Sparta New Jersey 07871

Send Bill to man acting as cop, for your time and carried out orders (reasonable
amount, normal daily wage, the bill will be understood as a tort claim and may
sway prosecutor to recuse or withdrawal)

Jordan Guttuso
c/o 10 High Street
Butler New Jersey 07405

notice
statement of bill

Greetings Jordan,
You, Jordan, owe i, Ron, $1,200.00 (see attached).
or
I require payment for fulfilment of Your orders on March X, 2015 (see attached).
Send full payment to 548 Glen Road Sparta New Jersey 07871.
If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know.
Kind regards,
Ronald Karl Portz II
548 Glen Road
Sparta New Jersey 07871

page 2
Itemized list of amount due
item 1) $1,200.00 per day, or any portion thereof, for the time period on March 8th, 2015;
for my time and labor following orders.

85 | P a g e

(in my case, I am also billing the sheriff...)

Edward V.Rochford
c/o P.O. Box 900
Morristown New Jersey 07963

notice
statement of bill

Greetings Edward,
You, Edward, as a man acting in the capacity of sheriff (liable for the actions of subordinate
agents), owe i, Ron, $4,800.00 (see attached). Send full payment to 548 Glen Road Sparta
New Jersey 07871.
If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know.
Kind regards,
Ronald Karl Portz II
548 Glen Road
Sparta New Jersey 07871

page 2
Itemized list of amount due
item 1) $1,200.00 per day, or any portion thereof, for the time period between March 8th,
2015 through March 11th, 2015; totaling $4,800.00; for my time and labor following orders.

Send fair warning notice to prosecutor...(tickets issued in error, not operating

under a licence at the time...)
Borough of Butler
Municipal Court

86 | P a g e

1 Ace Road
Butler, New Jersey 07405
[complaint/summons number 1403-BU-062734 through 1403-BU-062738, inclusive]
notice
i, [a] man, give fair and final notice that:
1) complaint/summons number 1403-BU-062734 through 1403-BU-062738, inclusive,
were issued in error.
2) i, [a] man, did not act in the capacity of a person, driver, motor vehicle operator or
other such title, at the time said complaints were issued.
3) i, [a] man, gave no entity the right to administrate [my] property.
4) i am not aware of any duty or obligation that I owe to the Legal society.
5) i do not believe this court was created for the purposes of causing harm. Any
further action, or inaction, by a man or woman acting in the capacity of court officers, that
interfere with property, will be a cause of harm and financial loss to i.
6) i require any wish, order or demand to be signed sealed and delivered upon me.
i, say here, and will verify in a court of record, that all herein be true.

Mo has suggested to send notice (via fax and/or registered mail) of appearance,
notice of identity (being that of a man, idiot in regards to legal society)
(My version, needs work)
i, [a] man, Ron, appear in person, unrepresented, only as a member of the Portz Family
without benefit of any other title. A good name and reputation that I have and continue to
labor to create; that no state or agent has interest in. i do not wish my capacity diminished
and can not, at this time, bear the burden of the title "Defendant", as i am an idiot in regards
to the Legal society and do not understand terms of art used by, nor am i familiar with the
process and procedures of the legal society. i am not competent to perform; and, at this
time, i do not wish to perform, as a member of the legal society.
before court, speak to prosecutor regarding questions...
At court hearing, gag yourself, glue your lips together, do not open your mouth. it
is a court of RECORD expressed in writing, so no judge, stenographer can switch
its meaning to something incoherant ( some words sound the same, but do not
mean the same, ex: their, there and they're)
Judge asks...
Identify and appearance?

87 | P a g e

"I am here to resolve this matter" "has the court received my notice of
identity?"
notice... i, [a] man, appear before this court solely as man, without
representation, without title (defendant, PRO SE, driver, operator), to give notice as follows; i
am an idiot in regard to legalese. i do not understand the customs of the legal society nor do
i believe any law exists which requires man to know or understand these things; i believe the
government exists to secure rights and to protect property of man.
Do you understand the charges?
i have questions regarding the charges...
Who is moving this case?
Prosecutors duty to disclose evidence?
Who are the parties?
What law is before the court?
Who is the injured party?
to compensate in private.

notice... I require leave of court, 72hours,

What is the joinder between the parties? notice... I require time to

review to make sure there is no error in 'discovery/information'
What benefit Is there to me to endorse a plea agreement?
What benefit is there to you?
Who is the state?
Is there a verified claim before the court?

Are you represented?

If you are not confident and need more time to learn.. require
stay/continuance/adjournment...
notice... i require leave of court, 90 days, to seek competent counsel. i
require this court provide certified complete copy of the case file (so that counsel can
determine the cost).
If you [think you] are ready...
notice... i require court officers to act accordingly and file notices
How do you plea?

88 | P a g e

plea to what? What is the law before the court?

notice... Whoever acts on my behalf assumes all liability.
notice... I require officers of this court witness without a law before this
court plaintiff moves a false claim against I, under pergery and does cause harm to my
reputation.

Notices (separately/individualy)
i, [a] man, require the judge to move [john henry] from the case due to not have first hand
knowledge of this case;
I require leave of court, 72 hours, to allow this court to subpoena "the state of xxx" to this
court. (I have the right to face and cross examine my accuser)
I require the point of law you are relying upon that leads you to believe you have control and
authority over i, [a] man?
I require you to submit your claim authorizes you to communicate a threat.
I require all officers of this court to act accordingly, no matter how high or petty, in this
public venue. Any physical contact, aggressive actions or coercion by intimidation will be
contempt of court.
No administration of property without right.
Whoever acts on my behalf assumes all liability.
Compensation is required to be paid in advance before any order is carried out.
Financial loss due to jail, detainment or other imprisonment
I require this court provide verified charges
Whoever wish i labor to understand codes, statutes or rules of another society, must pay, in
advance, fair and just compensation.
I require the public law produced before this court.
Harm to i if court proceeds, no harm injury or loss to xxx if adjournment
Sweat equity
before trial send notice to court
notice ...
I and my case will be present(court of record)
I require the judge/magistrate (all court officers no matter how high or petty) act accordingly
in this public venue, and...

89 | P a g e

1) file my claim to be heard on "date such and such" where all parties are already scheduled
to be present, to avoid further waste of limited resources.
2) witness that no plaintiff appeared.
3)

Apologize for the contempt, and ask for forgiveness, it is not my intent.
Offer to make payments, then challange the debt:

(butler case)
Claim:
i, Ron, claim wrongdoers trespass against my property (Exhibit "A")
Cause of action:
There is no law that exists between i, and the wrongdoers.
The [wo]man acting in the capacity of prosecutor does move a false claim against i, a man,
and my person, into the public without joinder of parties.
Order:
I require the restoration of my good name and reputation, no later than March 28, 2015.
I will place a charge of $1,000.00 per day, per said trespasser, for any failure in the
restoration on said date.
If the restore of said property does occur on or before said date, I will forgive those who
trespass of their debt, as I would wish others to forgive me of my trespass.

(Hamburg case)
Claim:
i, Ronald Karl Portz II, claim wrongdoers trespass against my property (see exhibit "A")
Cause of action:
There is no law that exists between i, and the wrongdoers.
The [wo]man acting in the capacity of prosecutor does move a false claim against i, a man,
and my person, into the public without joinder of parties.
Wrongdoers did take and carry away property (Exhibit "B")

90 | P a g e

Order:
I require the delivery of all said property, to the place of origin at 548 Glen Road Sparta, New
Jersey 07871, within and exclusively under my proper jurisdiction, no later than April 10,
2015.
I will place a charge of $1,000.00 per day, per said trespasser, for any failure in the
restoration on said date.
If the placement of all said property does occur on or before said date, I will forgive those
who trespass of their debt, as I would wish others to forgive me of my trespass.
Exhibit "A"'
i, Ronald Karl Portz II claim my reputation as my property. No [wo]man has interest, or higher
claim, to [my]property.[Cf. ..every Man has a Property in his own Person. This no Body has
any Right to but himself. The Labour of his Body, and the Work of his Hands, we may say,
are properly his. .... The great and chief end therefore, of Mens uniting into Commonwealths,
and putting themselves under Government, is the Preservation of their Property.-- John
Locke, "A Treatise Concerning Civil Government"]
Exhibit "B"
(picture of truck)

Allocution

Section 3- Police Traffic stops, car impounded, traffic court 12pgs

First thing you do when you see those cherries go off in Your rear window Of the police unit
behind you . Is to pull out your phone and press record because you're going to be recording
this incident for your protection second thing to do is to roll down your window and try to
waive them on to what you soon sorry I presume is an emergency ahead of you and I you
are a no other reason he should be pulling you over so you're just waiting on forward but if
he insist on staying behind your tail then pull over and take him by surprise by asking him
first are you needing help this should throw him off he'll start saying you don't fast you were
going the next question you throw at him is why are you talking to me that have clarified
you know you're going 25 / 60 you're not going to disagree with me that's fine . And here's
the hook quickly asking have I done any harm injury or caused loss or broke a contract with
any man or woman.. he will probably more than likely say no that's what you're going to
take the court and you're out you're done ..chemate..he admitted he just gave you a ticket
with no evidence on you that you broke any of God's law and since we don't operate under

91 | P a g e

the statute you don't care about any of the six million statutes code that person stand under
because you are not a fiction.

2015-01-19 @ 21;10;21 GMT deadbeatdads - how to deal with traffic stop (2)
In my area, the cop wants u to stay in the car unless/until he tells u to get out.i'm sure if by
the time they get to you and you're still seated in your car that may well be their usual
desired procedure, but I know of know common law points and authorities that would entitle
a cop to force you to enter your locked property in the event that you're not already in it,
sure you have a right to enter your property but a right cannot be turned into an obligation;
besides to be on house-arrest or car-arrest it takes a court order not a cop's say-so, absence
of which you have cause for a claim of imprisonment;
[1:27:32 PM] Julz: please provide your points and authorities that say otherwise, or let us
move on to what it is that you wish to bring to my attention so I may aid you
[1:28:30 PM] Julz: for it is he who needs you're help not the other way round
[1:28:54 PM] Julz: so you're just being the nice guy
[1:31:16 PM] Julz: there are a lot of absolutely ridiculous procedures they wish would go
according to plan yet with no basis in law whatsoever and easily sidestepped with simple
logic

That time when i got stopped with the police just down the road from me you know, i mean i
deliberately sped up to get stopped and you know he said;
Copper: good evening, sir;
DBD: good evening;
Copper: you do know the reason why Ive stopped you?
DBD: ive no idea, but obviously youre here to make some money for the magistrates court,
so carry on;
Copper: well, no, no you, you were speeding down here;
DBD: was i...!?
Copper: well, do you not know what the speed limit is down here...!?
DBD: 30 miles an hour;
Copper: well you were doing 37;
DBD: yup;

92 | P a g e

Copper: well thats against the law;

DBD: no, no, no your policy is only a guide line;
Copper: no-no, its the law;
DBD: oh ok, well can you point me to the law, that says Fleetwood Road South is actually
thirty mile an hour...!?
Copper: well, no-no, its any road with a lamp post so many yards apart...;
DBD: no-no-no-no, you said down here, down here is Fleetwood Road South, right...! so you
provide me with a point of law, youre relying upon that states Fleetwood Road South is a 30
mile an hour zone; and that that is the law;
Copper: well, its not, it comes under the Road Traffic Act, sir;
DBD: does it...!? ok no problem, well what is this Road Traffic Act youre referring to...!?
Copper: well, it comes under the Road Traffic Act;
DBD: ok, can you please recite it for me?
Copper: yes, it is an offence if you do this blah, blah, blah, and he went into bullshit mode;
DBD: thank you for that officer, well, unfortunately when i applied for me drivers license,
the DVLA didnt inform me of the Road Traffic Act because obviously they werent legally
qualified, my driving instructor didnt tell me about the Road Traffic Act because he wasnt
legally qualified, and my driving examiner didnt tell me about the Road Traffic Act because
he wasnt legally qualified either, so, seeing as youve given me legal advice officer, can you
give me a copy of your legal qualifications so i can rest assured that the information you
have given me is correct...!?
Copper: im not legally qualified;
DBD: well sir, you do realize its a criminal offence to impersonate a member of the bar
society...!? so what i need from you officer is your name and your number, because im
going to report you for committing a criminal offence in order to extort information and
funds for the magistrates court;
Copper: theres been no mention of magistrates court;
DBD: theres mention of magistrates court written all over you, and i bet you ten to a penny
its in your pocket as we speak;
Copper: no-no-no, its not;
DBD: okay, get out your note book, with your road traffic offences and your book where you
issue fines; so copper gets that out: ok, look on the back of it, where does it say you make
payments to..!? Her Majestys Courts and Tribunal Services; so therefore, sir, you are
extorting funds right...! and giving out incorrect information to extort information and funds
for a company you do not work for, that is fraud, sir, right so i need your name and number,

93 | P a g e

because im now going to report you, for committing a criminal offence, so if you think
youre going to be in that job for much longer, i dont think so; and with that he shut off his
camera, put it in the case, put back it in his car, and fucked off;
I don't know how many times DBD needs to say it get out the car, lock it and put the car
keys in your pocket before they get close enough and that instantly gets rid of one of their
desires which if you don't comply with will result in them damaging your car under the
pretext that you're refusing to do something which you should have no problems doing, all
this hiding in the car business is old news
once you're out the car you've de-escalated a tonne of shit upon your head and if they want
to get in the car they must reach into your pocket in other words lay their hands on you
trespass upon your property of which fact you warn the guy about before he has a chance to
do it

make a cop take a psych avaluation.hes is acting as a cop and you are telling him im not
an actor i am a man and i am not in your act..in your court.not the crowns.
Go after the man, if you cant, then go after the man whos the head of the agency. No need
to take down names in the moment a police confrontation is occurring, lest you put yourself
in danger.

Because u arent part of the legal society tell the officer i am not eligible for your services.

For traffic defence..not only do i believe i have the right to access to roads but in
your criminal code section2 it seems to read the same highway
voie publique ou grande route
highway means a road to which the public has the right of access, and includes
bridges over which or tunnels through which a road passes;

If officer wont give u their names just find out what police department they work at and
send him..

94 | P a g e

Write himu failed to train discipline and monitor your agents who act on your behalf for
your benefit i accured a loss (or harm or both)

Traffic tickets, how to write to the prosecutor

Sample letter to a prosecutor i am man write to you a woman a believe sometimes acts as
in the capacity of a prosecutor for (insert-place county city) to inform you that the august 3 rd
2014 activities of officer Williams Terrrroe the man that sometime acts as an agent for the
vancouver police department did and does continue to be the constant source of harm injury
and loss to i ; likewise your pursuit of case# 1199229292292 does cause harm injury and
loss to i ; i do realize that you might not be aware of said costs and this trespass against i
and hope that you will reconsider your pursuit of said case.i hope to receive written notice
of your intentking regards..(we are eliminating plausible deniability)

Government exist o protect property and i dont believe there is a man with a claim but if
there is i am willing to settle up..

If the prosecutor doesnt respondwrite backI wrote u a week ago hey this is important
here is a copy of the first letter can u please get back to me within the next 5days to let
me know u received these please..and if they still after a 3 rd letter then write to the
supervisor..are you the man responsible for this subordinate?

We only want to deal with a man so always flush the man or woman out into the openonly
a man is liable a police officer is only a perfection on paper

Tell the judge that u go by Tater Tot

If you have 10 days to put in a plea respond by noticing them.. that u are only going to be
appearing as a man to settle any debt i owe and to answer my accuser for hamr or breach of
contract and if anyone acts on my behalf they assume all liability..

95 | P a g e

If you go to court ask to face your accuser and can they bring them forththe court is to
take notice that this lack of response is dishonarble..

They are all actors!!! Make them say they are a man!!!

We rebut the presumptions by putting notice in to the court sample letter i a man
appear before this course solely as a man, without representation, without title defendant,
pro se, driver, operator to give notice as follows; i am an idiot in legalese; i do not
understand the customs of the legal society nor do i believe any law exist which requires
man to know or understand these things; i believe the government exist to secure rights and
protect property of man see exhibit a(idiot is defined extensively , everything explaining
legalese the right to a trial by jury (canada charter sec. 32), where it says in the constituiont
that they are their to protect rights..article 12 of the new hamshire constitution that says the
same thing..
The customs of the legal society and included

Simply write ..signed under duress and ur signaturethey cant do anything with that..

Handling a traffic stop as a man

When driving, have this written down/printed and take it WITH you:
I was in lawful possession of my property and I was moving from point A to point B, and I
dont believe any mans going to come forth and claim that Ive done wrong, or any mans
going to claim that Ive done harm to his property while I was moving from point A to point
B.
Now IF there is a man, please let him know immediately. Please let him bring his claim forth
immediately cus Ive yet to see his claim of a wrong because I want to compensate him way
before we get this into a public forum.
I advise you to call your supervisor, and someone in your legal department as well, before
you contract with me.

96 | P a g e

Give to man in police uniform. Advice him to call legal And if the man in uniform still wishes
to contract with us, then we will fill his orders. So as to be always in the act of performing
not complying..

U need the cops card so he knows where to our response to this cops complaint.. ask the
cop if he thinks i did something wrong? He should say yes [NOW YOU HAVE YOUR FALSE
CLAIM!!! ] continue and remind the police officer that he will have to prosecute this in court.
You are going to be moving this complaint against me so i need to properly answer you.
Because i want to settle this way before we go into a court room.. explain to the officer the
he wants to contract with me and not give me your information but what if i want to change
the terms and conditions of the contract how am i going to get a hold of you. That why u
have to give me some way of communicating with you.
If the officer says he is only going to bear witness to the worng..to whom did i do wrong?
The cop may say u broke a contract do behave in a certain manner and i am the police
enforcement officer and i determine who is in breach of contract and u have a contract with
the department of motor vehicle and youre in breach of contract..remind him that u are not
operating under that licence at the time of the incident. I have a licence but i was not
operating under it at the time..

Cops will have a hardtime following you hence tell him to write the ticket or withdraw is fine.
They have ur address so they can write u to stop the proceedings and dropping the
charges

Speeding does guarantee i will hurt anyone. I do that..not a policy!! I can think of a few good
reason speeding might save your life!! No thank you mommy state!!

How to handle an arrest

97 | P a g e

Repeat like a mantra i that your wish and you order?if all u are doing is following orders
this absolves you form everything because all you were doing was performing by following
the orders. Everyman has fair and just compensation for any service or anything he
performs or any product that he produces. He is entitled for just compensation. We are not
anybodys slave as slavery has been long since abolished and police. public servants.. how
can the servant order the master around?
If a man a acting as public servant wants to give orders they have to pay just like anybody
else.

U dont need to tell them how much the total is running in advance..just ike the maitrady
doesnt tell u the price of stuff before u pay..u make an order and u pay..

This should let u go faster than lighitning dropping all your charges when u get before the
magistrate!!
Sound like a broken record!!!
Simply explain to the officer the for cops to get paid they follow order and then get paid at
the end of the week for falling those orders!!!

Dealing with older charges brought up in statutory court

Plead guilty to everything the learned man of the codes in fornt of u is probably right..u are
not arhuing that u broke any of those codes or statutes in fact ur guilty of everything but the
problem is we live on a common law land and i have done no wrong, and no man has yet to
appear nor do i believe will a man appear to make a claim that i a man have done any
wrongthere has been no damage that any of the acts that i have or have not done
according to your code. I am an idiot when i comes to legalese , i dont stand o n legalese
and i dont act under neath any of your codesi am not a person i am a man and this is a
common law land i am probably guilty of ten thousand things according to your codes
before i walk into this court room today from my prison cell..i dont care!!! Because it has
absolutely zero impact on a man and u are looking at a man..in this common law land i we
want to see is another man come forth with a verifiable claim, and have him swear under
oath or affirmation that i have done something wrong and that i have yet to compensate
themthats it!! Everything should get discharged

98 | P a g e

Every traffic court case u are presumed to be guilty.its summary convictionif u r a citizen
of the united states the code appliessometimes i am a citizen of the united states when i
believe it benefits me but at this time i believe that its not a benefit to me so today i am
going to stand on the status of man!!! I believe you are looking at a man and since we are in
a common law land i am going to evoke the common law because we are in a common law
nation and i have done no wrong..and as a matter of fact you have to release me until some
man come forth with a verifiable claim that i have done something wrongthats the law of
this land that you sit opun and stand upon and youre the united states of America is a part
of the landthe land is not part of the united states of America. The land is above the united
states . the united state can come and go but the land will never disappear

Getting your property out of the impound lot

If ur car is in the impound find out who has the authority to hold your car and hence liability
too for holding your car and write to them ie.

Dear Gerald greetings, i believe u Gerald gold my property without right see exhibit A. said
act is a source of harm to i, post haste i require u to restore said property. Kind regards

I would follow up by going down to Gerald the man personally and tell him the same

Then immediately file a claim against that man has trespassed on property and u require the
immediate restoration of property.
you go to the sheriff office that your car is worth $2000 grand..i require u to put it in the
form of a bond. I will see that man in 30 days in court and if he has a superior claim he can
claim that bond when the case is over but that is a fair market value for that car so i
require u to put a mechanic lien on that car and release that car immediately. And will settle
this in court but i need my car now!!

So if at the end of the case i loss i can gie him the bond and pay it of with the bondsman
myself or i can give him the carbut right this moment i require the immediate restoration
of property

99 | P a g e

Mechanice lien creates a cloud on title on whatever it is you ae liening up.. because people
are less inclined to give u money for something u dont own %100 of.

U go dwon to the county record office and file the notice of completion. It is done afgter the
day of final inspection or a certificate of occupancy..or the date of substantial completion
U may be able to do this only with the county recorder but i would do it with wet inkso go
into the building when possible

Sometimes they mess with you and say ur car is worth $27000 whne its really $2000 so cry
just forget the lien root and just move your case through the court like lightning

Most of us dont prepare for the rare chance of getting muggedwhen ur using karl method
ur basically the inverseof that realtion to them..they are use to people standing up for
themselves and knowing how to so be gentle..

Once u have the man who is authorized to hold your car write them this..

(because u won your case) Explain them that there is no reason for them to hold my
property anymore because it is harming i a man to not have my property at this time and i
know you do not exist to cause harm to man i require u to release the property forth with..

Driving your property without registration, and the good samaritan law

Try and give judges a few different ways of looking at your case

100 | P a g e

Dont make court scarier than it needs to be as it will elicit to high of an emotion that u dont
want to deal with while you are trying to stay focused on your case and the other players..

If ur trying to get out of jail ..u need someone on the outside with power of attorney that a
local court will recognize to submit paperwork on your behalf.

If u have a car. Write to the attourney general or the local sheriff department and say i
have this car full indemnified. Its either in the form of an escrow or bond or some form of
insurance policy..that the state requires as a minimum coverage when i take my property
out into society. See exibit A . is there anything else u require of i a man or compel to take
my property from point a to point b in your state? Please let me know..
Attach proof of the coverage

If they reply you have to get your vehicle registered

Ask what would be the benefit would i derive from registering it with the state. I understand
then benefits the state would derive, i want to know what value i have gained to my
property benefits i a man would get. If i register with the state i see how the state is $100
richer..and if i register with the state my car can be force to comply with statutes that can
easily have my property[car] taken from me because i am not in compliance with a code or
statute.

I dont wish for a title to go from point a to point b . i dont need permission..i pay the roads
taxes that pay for these highways..roll with plates that say private indemnified bonded
insured

If someone steals ur car call 911 because u dont want ot be held liable specially if they kill
someone think dean Clifford. U cant take the keys out of the car the cops have toget
your liabilities in order..

101 | P a g e

As a fellow man when we see something wrong its is our responsibility to tell them to
stop..and if u dont stop i am going to have to interfere

Your license is the registry of your vessel your ship..and it lets them know who it belongs
too and who has jurisdiction over it..

Cops might say hey if u aint flying our flag we aint going to help you that is something we
will have to understand as a risk..Ben Franklin put it best Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For
Security Deserve Neither.

A judge may try to try to bait u into the conversation of the reason why they did what they
did like why they took your children.. u dont care why they did what they did.. do i want to
know why the rapist raped their victim as nothing can be gained from such knowledge.

How to address traffic court as a man

If someone is late to a court time..say 1:30 pm and no show stand up at 1:35 and say i am
man robin mitchell am looking for the man or woman whom summons me to appear at 9 am
and that u are there to settle any matter of a claim of wrong or settle any verifiable debt..do
this 3 times

U then go to the court clerk office and let them know in writing that yo9u were here and that
nobody appeared and get that times stamped

If u do this in traffic court they wont care and suspend your licence because they are
presuming that u are under contract and u ddint appear in court to let them no ur not in

102 | P a g e

breach of a contract.. u have to let them know u werent operating under the capacity of
that licecne at the time of the stall and that u were under a different jurisdiction.
They summons the wrong person they summons they licecne driver..and you were not a
licecne driver under the time of the stop. They have the wrong person u are a man going
from point a to point b with my property on that day and there was no harm or injury to man
on that day if this court believes that im an acting as this person drving with a licence well
then this court is in error..

A court is a place that people go to play games

If ur driver licence is suspended u have to cure it.. by addressing the courts and letting them
know u werent operating under the licence at the time of the incedent

Your good name and your word is the only thing you possess. Dont throw it around so willy
nilly!!! Police officers dont give out there name so dont give out yours.they are trained for
a reason..maybe you should learnonce people have your name they can throw it around
willy nilly too so guard it!!

There are no rules for traffic stops or detentions

They are simply arrest!!
Traffic stop is slang!!!

people v McGaughran
Vehicle Code sec. 40504, subdivision (a), commands that when a traffic offender such as
defendant herein gives his written promise to appear by signing two copies of the citation,
"Thereupon the arresting officer shall forthwith release the person arrested from custody."
(Italics added.) The statute leaves no room for interpretation: it plainly and unequivocally

103 | P a g e

Parking agent puts a ticket on your car, dont get mad, shake his hand and tell him that you
are not going to pay it.. and then take a picture of the ticket on the car and show him.. he
will smile and say he has already done this.. u say..i your case this picture is going to work
magic for youbut when i file my claim that you trespassed on my property with your
property ((my picture) this picture is going to work wonders and my court is going to be
higher than your court because we live in a common law land and i know how to evoke a
court of record! They will dismiss the ticket and let the ticket agent carry on doing his work
because nobody will wake up nobody has the right to touch your property.. would you let
someone put a ticket on your kid? Thats your property just like your car is!! Get it? They
cant touch your kid let alone your car!!!!

Jurisdiction regarding traffic tickets, and giving your conditions for a summons

City cops have no jurisdiction over handing out tickets..because who issue the license? The
state/province so should a state trooper over provincial police be dealing with this issue
jurisdictionally?
There are no city licensing agency just provincial are there?
Ask him to discharge it because it is outside of their jurisdiction..

And if he gave you a ticket also for speeding which is within their jurisdiction they because
they joined the two the second becomes invalid! The whole complaint is flawed if one part is
flawed!

That is why we separate our claims and our orders!! Separate as if one part of the claim or
order falls the rest of the paper work can stand because its separate..
Just like the divorce and child custody should be separate so that if you want to void
judgement on the child custody you dont have to start your divorce proceeding over again
too..seperate!!

104 | P a g e

This is a legal falling and this is another way to chop their complaints down..

I wouldnt be playing too much brain logic with copsunless it is funny

Now if the prosecutor has you scheduled to appear at 1 pm then he should be held liable for
wasting your time! Time once it is spent cant be restored so one needs compensation for
said loss

Give them a warning that next time you will appear under those conditions only and because
i dont believe anyone has jurisdiction over me; if anyone places and order they are going to
be held liable for it and if the case starts at 9 it better be wrapped up by 9:15; i am will not
wait around to deal with you attorneys!!

Ill appear if you have jurisdiction over a man show me where a man is required to have a
license to move point a to point b

If police officers wont return your property then you can issue you fair warning notice and
go after them in your claim and court

Negotiating with public servants, and understanding common law

the cops may threaten u wuth 18 years in prison and take all your plants and equipment
what you do is u start to negotiate with your counter offer..sure 18 months in jail well as a
man i require $20,000 a month sure and the fair market value for your plants and equipment

105 | P a g e

is $xxxxxxx and for your 10 year fire arm probation $10, 000 per year and for your DNA
order i will give $10,000 per ounce and there is a 3 ounce minimum..

Get officer badge numbers when ur taking orders!!

Whenever u are dealing with a traffic ticket u have to remind them (even when they are
offering u silly course to go on) and notice show me the law that requires me to have a
license for me to go from point a to point b with my apparatus!
do you believe i was driving?
They will say police officer bob bume
U reply u mean bob bume the man, who is sometimes a cop believes i was driving?
well i believe that driving is something i do with a golf club.. drive is what i use advance my
ambitions? So he believes i was driving? How is that wrong? Because u are using a word that
is ambiguous

Long can be destroyed as well if found in a statute..I long for the days of yesterday..desire?
Remind them that one is operating under the law of man not statutes!! Ur silly codes are
ridiculous and ten thousand pages thick and changing every day

Shall is like should it impliedthat the trick is it implied or expressed

IMPLI'ED, participle passive [See Imply.] Involved; contained virtually, though not expressed;
as an implied promise.

Expressed
EXPRESS'ED, participle passive Squeezed or forced out, as juice or liquor; uttered in words;
set down in writing or letters; declared; represented; shown.
late 14c., "stated explicitly, not implied, clearly made known" from Old
French espres, expres (13c.), from Latin expressus "clearly presented, distinct, articulated
precisely," past participle of exprimere (see express (v.)). Also late 14c. as an adverb,

106 | P a g e

"specially, on purpose;" it also doubled as an adverb in Old French. An expresstrain (1841)

originally was one that ran to a certain station.
Sooo is my name written into that statute or my photo in it somewhere?

I am a man 24 hours and a driver only but 13min so i will stick with man!!
U go in front of a jury to prove u are a man not a driveri could be a driver but i am clearly a
man!!

- Using the financial loss argument to restore your property from prison

Im sorry you like that I smoke weed, but that is property, are you going to release that
weed (property) back to me? or do you have some purpose in keeping it there? Because I
believe I have a superior claim to get the full benefit of my property. You claim thats your
property, did that property cause you damage? Oh it causes the tax payer damage? You let
a tax payer come forth and actually show you with a bill of particulars in which that weed for
some reason caused him $570 dollars of damage, and well work with him through the
administrative process, and compensate him on the private. Until some man comes forth,
thats my property, and I want property returned to the proper jurisdiction, or else if the
property is not returned, I am incurring a financial loss.

c.f. 1 Corinthians 7:4 The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and
likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.

Get the man to admit to believing we broke the law, then their complaint becomes a false
claim. If we want to answer this court I require leave of court to file a claim to properly
answer this claim before the court. and hell hand you the criminal complaint this is a
complaint I want a claim.

107 | P a g e

Moving your case on the common law side of the court

Their case number doesnt have any power on the paperwork
Now a clerk may take your claim and place it in their court vs at you court so you have
to file a notice that you are on the wrong side of the court.

Simply ask them to move it over to the claim side of the court and get it out of the complaint
side of the court.
If they say what do you mean by claim reply u know personal harm claims a trespass claim

The power of a man vs a government employee

Policeman have no rights they have duties. Someone can take that awy from you because
its a privilege.. not a right
Man has right and they trump duties in our society.. so your right to travel trumps his duty to
try and fine you specially with no contract!!!

Dont rely on the constitution only refer to it.. not only do i agree but so does your
constitution?

If you get a ticket dont fight the cop on the street just take it back in less than 72 hours to
the prosecutor handling the case and say this is a complaint and that i a man am here to
settle any verify claims of harm.they will say see u in court..and well you know FILE YOUR
CLAIM because he says he doesnt have that!!!!

Only man has a right to make a claim

A simple way to win in traffic court

108 | P a g e

Sneakily evoking the common law by asking judge does the prosecutor believe that Ive
broken the law? Do YOU believe that Ive broken the law? Thats two claims being made here
youve just evoked common law court of record as a man

No injury, no case
If the injured party cant appear there is no case.. they must appear and say his property has
been tresspased
During the al gore bush case.. he brought hang chairsbut that injured party is just a person
ie county so and so and they wont be able to show up and testify to anything because they
are a legal fiction.
Never argue the facts with a police officer..simply ask who did i harm?

In traffic court if you find yourself in fornt of a judge u can ask is there any reason whys i
cant establish a case in a common law court of record and move the state prosecutor (or
the county prosecutor) who is trying to prosecute a false charge of a crime that i drove to
fast? Is there any reason i cant bring him into my case?He should answer u yesbut
hopefully u didnt wait this long to do this!!

Dealing with checkstops

I a man wish to remain silent; I consent to no searches; I require my lawyer to be present at
this time
Sign for DUI stops, registration stops, checkpoints, border patrol inside the US border.

Not to be used for things like speeding .

For speeding say are you a man? (remind him that he is liable) are you interfering with a
mans right from going from point A to point B?

109 | P a g e

Also write is that your wish and order?

Cops are taught that "shall" is future tense

Often codes and statues say Shall.because they cant obligate man to do anything
because shall is in the future

Dealing with the DMV

U ask the DMV when they issued u a ticket :do you believe i am operating under the license
at the time of the police stop on (insert date)?
When they say yes

Reply i was not operating under the license when the stop occurred. I was just moving from
point A to point B in my property [my car]; did i cause anybody harm by doing such an act
when they filed their case? Did anyone files a case or claim against me? Their case was filed
in error because you werent operating under the license when i was as a man going form
point a to point b in my property [car]; use the id a form of identification only

U cant go after an officer he is perfect.. u go after the man or woman

Do you believe I do wrong?

someone tries to hand you a citation u say i only answer to claims..citation is not a claim. I
thought i was here because someone says i do wrong? Is anybody here say i do or did
wrong? Where does it say in your codes or statues that i did wrong? Wrong is a common law
term. The state cant say u do wrong because we are its creators. U cant turn to god and tell
him he is wrong because he will just laugh at you..

110 | P a g e

only another man can say u do wrong..specially with driving without a license. If u dont
have a drivers license how can u even hold me to those rules? What r u going to do take my
drivers license away? I dont have one lol?

a man can move from point a to point b then show the judge you demonstrating how u can
move form point a to b in the court room and show him that one doesnt need a license to
do that.. i dont think that hurt any body judge do you? judge no ..exactly.when i was
moving my car from point a to point b was i hurting anybody? Judgethats not the point?
reply with oh yes it is the point. Because if nobody is here making a claim that i did them
wrong or hurt them then what am i do here?
U could have hurt someone !!! Again conjecture isnt a crimeand having a drivers license
wont stop any harm

Place ur own claim in and put all your question before the court in your own case file days
before the trial so he knows youre not going to be ambushing himeven at pretrial

U ride the paperwork and dont say a word.. they ask u question u say can any one answer
the question i have placed before the court?

One day we didnt have license now we do..codes and statutes change all the time.. so
illegal is like feeling they change all the time. One shouldnt give a rats ass about someones
feelings did i hurt someone or not? Not did i hurt your feeling?
judges like sense of humor says karl in your writtings

citation
[sahy-tey-shuh n]

Examples
Word Origin
noun
1.Military. mention of a soldier or a unit in orders, usually for gallantry:She recieved a presid
ential citation.

111 | P a g e

2.any award or commendation, as for outstanding service, hard work,or devotion to duty, es
pecially a formal letter or statement recountinga person's achievements.
Synonyms: official praise; award; honor, laurel, reward, kudos.
3.a summons, especially to appear in court.
4.a document containing such a summons.

So if an officer is acting on some paperwork ie a warrant.. u ask him who is responsible and
if he say the paper told him to do it then you tell him thats crazy and that he is liable for
everything he is doing.. he nor i wrote that paper..the officer cant swear to anything on that
paper. He is liable
what your saying to the officer is that when this is all said and done ..we are going to see
that it was a ll a false claim.. and that if he is doing simple what the paper says well that
wont stand as protection in the eyes of any court.. so does he really want to be involved in
this possible false claim.. it now is about the individual being isolated from police buddy
legal world.. you letting the loser of your future case know they will be liable when you come
back and hold them to their unlawful actionslien em up

Require
REQUI'RE, verb transitive [Latin requiro; re and quaero, to seek. See Query.]
1. To demand; to ask, as of right and by authority. We require a person to do a thing, and
we require a thing to be done.

The government may have authority but they have no right to do it?

If youre a citizen of them then yes.. they cant require the man but they can require you
(the man and the citizen combined) you is pluraldemand the singular i

112 | P a g e

On your licence plate I would put private or not for hire they all ready have these for sale
on line

If a cop pulls you over ask him if he is giving the ordersif not ask what do they want to do
next.. but if they do start ordering one around then send then a bill for services rendered.

To prove financial responsibility, we can get a state bond, put money in escrow, or just give
state a cash deposit. Ask insurance company to show us how to do this. (become financially
responsible in the eye of the law). Then send proof to secretary of the state (WHO DO WE
SEND THIS LETTER TO IN CANADA?) representing all the people, we are then letting all the
people know. Address them by their first name, do not address the title, address the man.

How do I obtain proof of insurance?

All documents except the SR-22 or FR-44 can be obtained online by visiting the policy
documents sec. of our online service center. If you would rather speak to a customer service
representative, please call (800) 861-8380.
Also, more states are allowing digital ID cards as valid proof-of-coverage. Learn more about
digital ID cards.
If you are a GEICO policyholder and you know that you need an SR-22 or an FR-44 please call
(877) 206-0215. If you are not sure if you need an SR-22 or FR-44 or just want to learn more,
read on for everything you need to know about an SR-22/FR-44.
If you haven't registered for online services yet, you can sign up now.
What is proof of insurance?
To help you on your way, here is an overview of the various types of documents that may be
referred to as "proof of insurance:"
Insurance ID Card/Insurance Card the information that insurance ID cards contain vary by
state but generally the policy number, policy effective dates, vehicles and policyholders are
shown. Use this card to register your vehicle or keep it in your car as proof of insurance for
law enforcement.
Proof of Coverage a form which shows the vehicle, the policy effective and expiration
dates, and the limits of coverage carried on the vehicle. Use this form to show your
lienholder or leasing company your insurance coverage.
Verification of Coverage (MD FR-19) a form requested by Maryland as proof of insurance.
Use this form when you receive a letter from your Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration or
a citation that requires you to provide an FR-19.

113 | P a g e

Canadian Insurance Card Your US auto insurance card is accepted as proof of insurance
while traveling in Canada as a tourist; Canadian insurance ID cards are not necessary. Learn
more about visiting Canada by car.
SR-22 or FR-44 (Certificate of Financial Responsibility) a certificate mandated by the state
that verifies that you have auto insurance liability coverage. Usually, it is required only for
certain driving-related violations. If you need an SR-22 or FR-44, the courts or your state
Motor Vehicle Department will notify you. Depending on your state of residence, the
Certificate of Financial Responsibility form is referred to as either an SR-22 or an FR-44.

Whatever code we are accused of having broken, print it and bring into court. (exhibit as
their code, not ours)
Admit to the facts (speeding etc.) but their code does not apply to us so we cannot have
broken them.

. The proper use of non assumpsit

- just put it in front of your signature it makes your signature invisible..you are not
contracting is what is means.

ASSUMP'SIT, noun [Latin assumo.]

1. In law, a promise or undertaking, founded on a consideration. This promise may be verbal
or written; An assumpsit is express or implied; express, when made in words of writing;
implied, when in consequence of some benefit or consideration accruing to one person from
the acts of another, the law presumes that person has promised to make compensation. In
this case, the law, upon a principle of justice, implies or raises a promise, on which an action
may be brought to recover the compensation. Thus if A contracts with B to build a house for
him, by implication and intendment of law, A promises to pay B for the same, without any
express words to that effect.
2. An action founded on a promise. When this action is brought on a debt, it is called
indebitatus assumpsit which is an action on the case to recover damages for the nonpayment of a debt.

114 | P a g e

Canada requires a person/class of persons to have license/insurance, but not a man/

[wo]man.

Section 4-Taxes 16pgs

Just ask the IRS where do they get the right to make an assessment of i. ..? let see if they site
some code or statute that we can blow apart ie. you making an assessment on the basis that i
made a self assessment.. i didn't make any assessment!!! that is a false assessment!!!
If the irs asks you how much income u made...pull a Hillary Clinton I don't recall
[12:20 PM] easy isn't an option...:

<<< What does one do if the IRS sends a request to file package? Does one look for a man
or woman in a response letter just like any other legal situation?easy isn't an option..., Today
12:20 PMyes, the very first thing is to find a man/woman to correspond with to help you
settle the matter.

whos the man form kahuga county going to come forth and give me the itmeized statement
of the bill. i have not yet recieved it to date but as soon as i do i will pay it all. I have yet to
receive the exact charges so i can answer them difinitively
they know the rules you dont have to expain the rules which is it better not be off by a
penny because i cent of and we have fraud!!
Tender me the bill and the itemized statement of the bill of particulars

Call the man or woman who is the top dog at the agency and ask do you believe that i owe
this agency a debt? if so, how am i in debted to this agency? What sis they provide for
me? what was the benefit i received? What was the product? what was the service? And
please itemize it and give me a bill of particulars? no man at th irs has first hand knowledge
of your case because they werent there..hence everything the irs will say will only be

115 | P a g e

hearsay!!
because no man can come forward with that claim because they dont know how much
money u made and u cant be forced to testify against myself they are caught in a catch
22!! Again!! no man!! No claim!!

And they better not be off by one penny because (just like sSylock and his pound of flesh) or
else its fraud!!

Ok folks about a month ago i posted a copy of a Notice of deficiency to the board not only
for my benefit but maybe to the benefit of others if a solution can be found. well i sent the
following letter in response. Greetings Layne, i, believe you are the man who sent the
enclosed letter "NOTICE OF DEFICENCY". i wish to settle this matter. What do you wish from
me? Kind regards Mike. I waited 10 days and recieved no response so i sent another letter
inquirying if they recieved my first letter and enclosed the letter and repeated what was in
the first letter. I recieved the following responses which i will post

King John sent tax collectors in to gotham...they got wise...by acting insane the tax
collectors had to move on and call them...incompetent....the birth of the idiot... The trick
worked, leading to the saying: "There are more fools pass through Gotham than remain in
it." Villagers were also dubbed the Wise Men of Gotham.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-24760791

When we use the SIN # we are saying we are an employee of canada working for
playstudios.

116 | P a g e

so hence canada is rightly asking for their cut

we put canada in the middle of our employment

Write exempt on your tax forms!!!

First letter to the irs is this the man or woman assigned to this case? (man on man)

Gov subcontracts to small companies to place boots on cars so becareful going after the
governor..find out who the man or woman is and ask them by what authority do you have to
place a boot on my car?

Speed cameras are also subcontracted!!!

Traffic tickets, how to write to the prosecutor

Sample letter to a prosecutor i am man write to you a woman a believe sometimes acts as
in the capacity of a prosecutor for (insert-place county city) to inform you that the august 3 rd
2014 activities of officer Williams Terrrroe the man that sometime acts as an agent for the
vancouver police department did and does continue to be the constant source of harm injury
and loss to i ; likewise your pursuit of case# 1199229292292 does cause harm injury and
loss to i ; i do realize that you might not be aware of said costs and this trespass against i
and hope that you will reconsider your pursuit of said case.i hope to receive written notice
of your intentking regards..(we are eliminating plausible deniability)

117 | P a g e

Government exist o protect property and i dont believe there is a man with a claim but if
there is i am willing to settle up..

If the prosecutor doesnt respondwrite backI wrote u a week ago hey this is important
here is a copy of the first letter can u please get back to me within the next 5days to let
me know u received these please..and if they still after a 3 rd letter then write to the
supervisor..are you the man responsible for this subordinate?

We only want to deal with a man so always flush the man or woman out into the openonly
a man is liable a police officer is only a perfection on paper

Tell the judge that u go by Tater Tot

If you have 10 days to put in a plea respond by noticing them.. that u are only going to be
appearing as a man to settle any debt i owe and to answer my accuser for hamr or breach of
contract and if anyone acts on my behalf they assume all liability..

If you go to court ask to face your accuser and can they bring them forththe court is to
take notice that this lack of response is dishonarble..

They are all actors!!! Make them say they are a man!!!

We rebut the presumptions by putting notice in to the court sample letter i a man
appear before this course solely as a man, without representation, without title defendant,
pro se, driver, operator to give notice as follows; i am an idiot in legalese; i do not
understand the customs of the legal society nor do i believe any law exist which requires
man to know or understand these things; i believe the government exist to secure rights and
protect property of man see exhibit a(idiot is defined extensively , everything explaining
legalese the right to a trial by jury (canada charter sec. 32), where it says in the constituiont
that they are their to protect rights..article 12 of the new hamshire constitution that says the
same thing..
The customs of the legal society and included

118 | P a g e

If the irs has garnished your salarythis is causing me great harm as a man and i require a
garnishment hearing immediately

You cannot know the enemy, you can only know your self.
If a cop pulls us over and asks for our names, well say youre the detective, you figure it
out.
A state cannot convict a man without a live witness in court.
Man was made to serve God, in the absence of God we will still seek to serve..other men,
persons etc.
Cops cant make us do anything, they will convince us to voluntarily bring drugs out of our
pocket and expose the public to danger; its safe on us in private (in pocket), whoever pulls
it out of the pocket and into the public, is liable. I will not turn evidence against myself. If you
ORDER me to take it out of my pocket, then the order giver is liable for the exposure.
Cop asks for ID, I aint giving you anything, youre gonna use it against me. Asking? Telling
me? thats not going to work, ORDER me. Ill be more than glad to. Ill do it under a direct
order, not voluntarily. They want us to voluntarily enter into the 2D world.
People have the right to be secure in their paper and effects.

Also the leters they present u fool u into believe its saying something else..careful Wotburg
Council is not a man!! Dont take orders unless its a man giving it to youso you can send
him a bill!! Or else your taking the 2D world and bringing it to life!! Dont make it real make
the illusion fall apart quickly!! Look for a man to give you orders so you can make him take
responsibility if they are wrong!!
Intro letter to irs Hi Mr. or Mrs IRS? How would you like me to address you:i dont believe we
have been formerly introduced, let me introduce myself, i am a man and my name is Karl
and who are you again? and how do we have any business as i have no recollection?
IRS will have people look like they are testifyingASK THE JUDGE is this woman testifying?

119 | P a g e

Yes and no answers, flip court to common law, challenge jurisdiction, child support

So u say who owes going to come forth from the irs to tell me an exact dollar amount that i
owe? [nobody is going to come forth] ..please have someone to the exact amount down to
the cent explain how i owe the irs money..? all i want is a man to come by and verify that the
itemized bill detailing what i owe is true under oath and affirmation so i can gladly pay the
bill!!!

Doesnt matter what court you are in who is the man on the prosecutor side whose going
to come forth and just give me an verified to be true itemized statement of the debt and
show me how u arrived at that so i can get this over with and tender them a bill!! I cant do
anything until i get a bill!!! What are the exact charges so i can answer definitively ??
Because if they draw one once one drop more than i owe you and u will get u for making a
false claim but dont threaten this or any one.

Until they answer that question they cant proceed??

Ask them for an itemized statement of the bill so you cant settle the debt as i want to be a
honorable man send it forth with so i can settle this so there is no controversy..
They may send u the bill..
Then u ask for an itemized and they may send it..
Then ask how much did coi county have to put out?
And how much is this federal grant money was reimbursed?
how much did they get form the state reimbursement?
Is this pure 100 % coi county tax payer money?

- Property tax, a corporation causing harm to a man

120 | P a g e

If u run a corporation you better make sure to train and monitor your subordinates..because
your little monster called corporation is set loose on the public and u are responsible
A corporation is created to benefit man and the slightest bit of harm and they cannot appeal
when they revoke their charter for harming man..

Forget lets be reasonable its black or white..watch out for their term of art..
They are trying to color the situation..

We are not giving government an inch or they will take a mile..

You have to give back to society!!! If u arent doing anything maybe property taxes might be
your way to gicve back to help your localities.. how r the figherfighter going to get gas to get
to your house!!!

U do not want to divulge your earnings to the irs

Look for extortion and have them put it in writing becaiuse it is communicating a threat and
extortionbut for a person in their legal society it is not ..because they fall within their right
to do that to themdont succumb they dont have jurisdiction(authority)

- How to get the name of the man or woman working at an agency that is pursuing you

I got a lovely letter from the irs and i want to know who this man or woman is who has been
assigned this case?

They answer whatever name and just confirmed it was a man or woman!!

121 | P a g e

U get the name and write her hey are you sue the woman that has been assigned my
case?

She should say yes i am the woman ( you now have her in the capacity of a woman)
But if she is smart she will sayNo i am the agent who is incharge of your case.. in that case
u ask her for the man or woman.

Dealing with your employer over IRS garnishment

U have an agreement with your employer for the work you do..u can stop them from sending
it the irs and demand it..and if they are afraid of the irs u tell them to talk to me directly and
dont worry..if they call u tell them u dont want to be in breach of contract with this man and
be sued by this man.. its his property and i will give what he exactly earned..

do not redirect or relocate any of my property their will be a breach of contract..if someone
wants to say i owe a debt they can come to me

Tactic number one makes the person confess that they are a man or woman before u get
anywhere!!

They say u have been paying this tax all your life respond with i am relooking at my life
and realizing everything i looked at that i was doing has been wrong so now i want to
double check everythingsoo what is this national insurance tax or whatever tax they are
talking about

122 | P a g e

Ask these silly agent where the law says u have to pay and if they know it have them
actually read it to youthen cut it to shreds with wat u knowie where am i expressly
written into it? I am not a tax payer i am not a citizen? I am just a man done.

When they say you respond with i am not chinesse who is this YU, you speak of?
Or there is no you as there is no more than just me singular here simple as a man

Ask who is saying i owe them money? Who you tax revenue lady the priminister who?
Whose signed this chase into existence? Chase them demand to speak to who owes you
money or who says you owe

Engaged who ever is coming at you and say u want to pay but before you do i just want to
have a chat and see if i can work it out with the (irs or cra) on the private side so i can get
my paperwork right with a few letter and a conversation before i cut them a cheque

You dont want to say no..fastest way to court!!

Talk like a man dont say can u hand me a bill for what i am lawfully liable for?
Just pretend ur talking to anybody else can u hand me a bill
Drop the lawful liable and play stupid please send me the bill? Will not make them want to
get legal with you.. keeping it simple remember the irs cant send you a bill so the next
question is well then how can i know how much i owe? And who r u? suzy? So youre the
one who is saying this is true? (god only knows what is true) she should be saying something
like they say you owe? Respond with who is this they you speak of? And can u get me in
contact with this they that says i owe them? Maybe there name so i can find them because i
think they might be mistaken so i just want to clear this up?

You are trying trap them? So draw them out? play stupid?

123 | P a g e

Did you create the 1040? Do you understand the words on the form? Then why are you
doing other than everyone else is doing it? It is just peer pressure.
if they want you to force you because you are completely compromised remind them they
are holding a gun and you are not and thats why you are signing it and place your NA
down as your signature its non assumpsit
Means nothing above applies to i a man.. and let them know you put your mark down on the
paper and its lawfull..take it to you legal department they will know

There was 10 years span when there was no commissionary at the irs only an associate
commissionare of the irs position because..

You go straight to the top and say who is the top dog of the irs..they should say bob smith.
Then you say i will write a letter to bob smith. Hey bob i dont know if you are aware of
what is going.. and i am a man named robin am trying to communicate a simple letter and al
i was asking was a simple question how is this frivolous( if the irs agent has called your
process that). please get your subordinates in line regarding this simple matter and i am
sure u dont want to be wasting your time on this simple matter..can u put somebody on this
case for me..thanks a lot!!

Dont waste your time with those seasonal tax agents. .they dont know anything!! Beside
dont u want to be talking to the top dog whenever things get sillybecause they most
probably will.be nice as pie when u write these letters!!

Irs is voluntary just watch senator harry reed on youtube tell you!!

Sample letter
I dont know who the united states is /IRS..i have never met him i have never touch it never
saw it i never smelt it i never taste it i have no idea what it is i believe it might exist
somewhere or in some dimension but i have seen it in the third dimension.where does it

124 | P a g e

exist? I dont know but my guess is that it is in the hearts and minds of men. Can i touch it ?
no. can i talk to it? No Can i see it? no well then how can i owe it a debt? Will it come into
open court and press it on the record?

if the irs disssappera it will come bacl in another form if not stronger so the best deal is to
keep the irs and learn to beat them. And keep them stilldont get ride of them just control
them

does government believe it can tell u wat to do with your property?absolutely not unless u
let them!!

If i create money or i create wealth and i go to work and i put green dollars in my pocket
thats my property and nobody has the right make a claim for my hard worknobody but i
alone not even a dime!! What does the irs thinks it has done for me? Has it housed me, fed
me, clothed me because i only remember mom and dad doing that for me?i owe nothing to
the irs!! Show me where it provided me a service or created a product in which it tendered
me and i have yet to pay for! And i u cant then i owe the irs nothing!

If judges say there is contract obligating u in some way u ask where is that contract?is it
here? Thye may say no
Ask is this some code your coming after me with? They say yes you demand for the law
because the thomspon cant be liable and they wont be able to produce it and if they do can
thye see if your expressly written in it? Or show me the creator of that law and how they can
hold me liable? Show me how he created it for my behalf? And then i will comply and
consentand tender compensation but until then cease and decist or i will hold u liable for
making a false claim..

only because this is impossible thing to do

We can only hold a man liable when he believes, so we try to get them to say.

125 | P a g e

Do you believe I owe the debt? What do you believe BOB? Oh you do? Then put that on
paper and sign it.

i dont recall how mush income i made. No law requires me to know that we dont plan on
turning states witness on ourselves. We are idiot ,,,so u at the irs tell us since ur the
experts!!
your relationship to the IRS in regards to common law

Do not sign the 10-40 form (tax season), its a confession.

Go back with your confession and avoidance and explain to them Im sorry I made an error
I entered into a contract and I now rescind and revoke any claim upon that contract.

Understand that we are not any of these fictional entities and that theyll have to prove
jurisdiction.

Im just a man, and Im looking for the regular 10-40 form that applies to man. The first
one they send us back is going to have a OMB number that can only be used to collect
information for that stated purpose (having foreign earned income). Write another letter,
look Im just a man under the common law, and I need to just get the 10-40 form that
applies to I a man. Look, I dont have any foreign income, I dont do business in foreign
banks, I dont even leave the country. I cant fill this out under penalty of perjury, because it
has an OMB number of this on it, and that OMB number gives me the status of a foreign
party. Again, I am just a man, not a foreign party, please help me. Could you send me the
correct form? I am just the regular 10-40 form that only applies to I a man.

The next one they send will say that we are an officer of the government and that I reside in
the District of Columbia and that I am a corporate entity and that I am a party by that
privileged entity. We write them back again please, I have to sign this under penalty of
perjury, could you please help me? I just need to have the regular 10-40 form that only
applies to I a man, none of the fancy ones, Im not a party to any of these and I have to sign
this under penalty of perjury. Im just a regular man under the common law.
3 times the charm, and then theyll leave us alone.

126 | P a g e

What we earn from our personal labour, if were not employed by the government, our
money is foreign income because its foreign to the government.

KARL: letter from the IRS, we write back I believe theres no standing obligation attached to
my person to comply with such orders/demands. Please show me the law.

Stranger=foreigner in a system that doesnt recognize man. Im a stranger in these parts.

IRS is garnishing your wages through your employer

If the irs is garnishing your wages without your permission...that means ur employer is
giving the irs ur money..so u can't sue the irs because they didn't do anything as its ur
employer that is doing the wrong to u...tell ur employer to cease and desist or u will seek
remedy..

For instance if u lend ur car to Bob and u tell Bob to give it back to u when ur done...Bob
can't give ur car to the irs because u and Bob have a trust..

401 is voluntarily giving someone your money to do with it whatever they want!!!because u
never placed any terms and conditions on it!! If u Assume it( bear all liability) if you didnt
say u expect this all back when u retire..thats assumption ..because they never said they
would give it back!!its the IRS btw!!! 401 k is in the same title code 26 sec. 401 sub sec.
K!!! YUPPP!!! Total scam!!
they can and have at any ime take your money and give you any bs excuse they want and
there isnt a thing oyu can do about it..because u gave it away!!
They dont come after young folks thye wait till mthe end and then tell you some
nonsense about restructuring and there goes your money!! And u cant sue!! Because you
unconditionally surrendered your money to them!!! U have no say and they dont owe you
one! It was a gamble form the beginningits what is typically none as a ponzi schemecon
man have always existed.

127 | P a g e

Just like a casino can prey on you to take your money doesnt mean they put a gun to your
head to come in? so they arent liable for your loses.same with the 401k you have no
recourse because none put a gun to your head!!

You would probably have to go to a trial by jury to get some help but they will have to bend
the law to get you your result!!

Public IRS remedies, 401k's and other contracts

The lynch pin for the IRS bothering to put you in tax court is the assessment.(remember
they have been known to use an administrative courts vs tax courts to get jurisdiction)
without an assessment they cant move against you civilly or criminally..one objection comes
to mind if they wanted to come in to your building the find your records and you
obstructed them..but other than that they use the assessment to move against you..
so if the irs is messing with you what u want to do is find the person that did the
assessment..
You do this by a freedom of information request (dont know how this process exactly works)
who is the agent or agents that did the assessment between the years (2010-2013)?
when u get that info you write a letter to the agent and write the regular questions that
expose the lie??? Not sure exactly Can they verify the debt? this set you up to do your
claim against that agent.
if you have a levy or a lien by the irs on your house it came form an assessmentit didnt
happen by itselfthat means someone is on the hook!! And they cant lien or levy u up
unless they have a judgement.. and if they do this, all u have to do is go to you local county
court and tell them that the local county recorders office has a lien on you and you require
an immediate hearing on this matter and u have a right to a trial!!
So the irs cant enforce it on the civil side..but the irs will retaliate and come after u
criminally because the underlining assessment is still on the table and the irs will try and
come after u criminally
KL they can come after you but they cant come after i the man so just make sure you
separate yourself form them by sepearting i the man form the person....ther is no you.. just
i.
ask them who they are coming after? Thye will invariably use the word you to write you..well
this sets you up to explain there is no you there is only i a man..
augment your process by doing another freedom of information act request to the director of
the irs and ask them for a proof of claim.. what you will get back is a single page answer

128 | P a g e

there is no proof of claim signed by the director in blue inkthis places the magistrate in a
box.
but u dont need this ultimately because u dont care about the director of the irss opinion
because when u put your claim in they will not be able to bring a verifiable claim to the court
and check mate!!

And dont forget when you bring your claim you also need to place your order!!the claim is
what went wrong or what stating and then the order is part two saying how u want it fixed or
want you want done!!place them at the same time!!

There is an administrative way that is very powerful In the late 90s their was a period
when the irs was being horrible..yanking people out of their car and taking their wallets..or
going into old folks nursing homes and taking wedding rings off of old ladiesawful awful
stuffso what happened as a result was a new law called internal revenue reform and
restructuring act of 1998 also know as the tax payer bill of right the book had a lot of
remedies in it.. there is a 911 form is one of these remedy and no longer can a officer do
anything without the prior approval of the tax inspector general.ssoooooooooo you can also
ask for another freedom of information request for the matching contract that the tax
inspector general and what u will find is when u ask they will respond with no authority
was granted signed by the tax inspector general
911 form carefully so read the instructions inparticular it must be filled in somewhere stating
what kind of hardship this assessment will cause you..u wont be able to pay your bills and
this will cause you get harm and loss u fill this with a tax payer advocate in your state..and
the advocate has the ability to stop any and all irs functions on that matter including
criminal prosecution!!
1203B allegation referral form there is a number of items (12217 allegation referral form is a
form that is very serious so becareful and make sure you file it with the commissioners
complaint department) that there for reporting malicious or fraudulent conduct by irs
agentsrumours say when one of those stick it ruins the irs agents ability to retire..and its
for violation of constitutional rights, it could be for threats, false assessments..
To make it effective is to take it to your congressman to mail it on your behalf!!
They will not help you if you send it to the wrong department!! So get it correct!

Also you should cc J Russel George inspector general of the tax administration..he is
responsible for watching over the improper actions of his IRS agents.. he wont ignore u
because he has been on the hot seat in fornt of congress before so he is probably going to
respond to you..

129 | P a g e

So the gov. is coming after you for some sort of income tax..when was the date of the last
time you worked? u reply i cant remember? Its written on the past letter i wrote gov
official lets put donw june 30 reply with i dont know how you could interpret that from
my response?gov official this is just protocol we just round it up in our system when people
cant remember. Didnt u right it down? u remind heryes i wrote it in the letter i sent
u..and if i find that letter and the date is different guess who i am going to sue? gov official
are u going to sue the tax office? u replydid the tax office fill that information
incorrectly? gov officialno u reply who do you think that i am going to sue?gov official
should meekly replyme?u reply but since i have you here i remembered what the letter
said here are the two question on that letter..1 i see that this national tax contribution is a
contribution..and when i look up the word contribution it says voluntary? So do i have to pay
this if its voluntary? gov official well everybody has to pay there taxes? reply with thats
nice but who is everybody? Because that is not my name? gov u know u have to pay?
replywhat law or statute says i have to pay?gov official (starts reading code and speaking
of persons)reply sorry to interrupt you but who is this person?gov official you know
..you ..we..all of us?reply with i dont know about this u we talk because the last time i
looke d at my birth certificate my name isnt spelled that way. So again who are these
person you are going on about and what does that have to do with me? gov official
laughing hopefullywell its actually a contribution to your main taxation reply with so
somehow how you understand voluntary as mandatory? So that means you think its okay to
go to mcdonalds and ask for a beef burger and you instead get a horse burger..and you are
okay with this?gov officialwell no reply with the more u talk the craier this is all starting
to sound..it there anywhere where its is expressly written in there..that means is my name in
their? govno reply so then what you are saying is that its just implied? hopefully this is
going to be a pleasant experience and its was a good time and in good spirit ask her i just
have one more thing to say gov officialy sure reply i just want to wish you a great
weekend gov official should be smiling its important to kindly help remind this officials
that they are on the hook for their actions!(anyone who acts on your behalf is liable)

How to deal with getting a judges full name!! just write a letter to the judge..i require your
full name and if not the reason as to why you wont or cannot and the reasons why and
please sign it!!

Tax court, and harm to a man by government

130 | P a g e

In this country you have to forgive me of my trespass as you have to forgive me of my debt.
U cant cause me harm that is not your job!!
You [judge] have been created for the benefit of man and i told u that you are going to
execute that judgemnet on me a man that it will cause harm to me ..
The judge will say but you owe a debt to the irs
u didnt hear what i saidi said if you execute your judgement it will hurt i a man(the two
arent related..they are separate things. He could ask you to be a slave to them and work
it off? But he has decided that the house should be taken to settle the bill.. well ur saying
fine i owe the irs but the house is another issue completely that the judge is creating an
judgement that will harm man and he cant he can judge that i owe adebt..but the
judgement cant hurt man because he was created for mans benefit!!!
how is the united states of America or the irs going to be harmed if i dont take my house
away from me?
How is it a benefit for them? They are a fictional entity? How can they be changed by my
house? They wont be affect in the least? But i will be harmed if you take my house!
It doesnt have arms it doesnt have legs.it cannot possess it!!

everyone in america pays taxes! A judge my shout out

reply with so native American on reservations, the Eskimos in the arctic circle? everyone
form the north pole to the south pole? Cuba are in America as well? Do they pay taxes?
he may reply you know what i mean?
u replyno i dont? u judge are implying things and u know very well that you need to be
expressed not implied. For good law to be good it must be exact! If youre going open your
mouth in this court you better be dead on
ur going to judge me and you dont know where the Americas lieu better get someone else
in here before someone gets hurt specially me!!

The irs doesnt intimidateits employees do thatnote the differenceif u say the irs
intimidates, u are bringing it into existence so dont!! the irs is just 3 letters on a piece of
paper..nothing more

131 | P a g e

If youre dealing with the irs u should be in tax court not anywhere else??!!

Prosecutor will name call to draw u in like TAX PROTESTOR ..reply with i think everyone
should pay their taxes!! Because if you believe you owe taxes u better pay them!!

U can basically take any judgement in a tax court and flip it saying its a completely biased
court.. if the irs wanted to it could go to a regular mom and pop court and file a claim and
that way i could face and question my accuser they dont and want you to play in there
court with there rules where you have no rights! How fair is that? a jury will eat that up! Tell
the jury to find in your favour and if the irs want to face a man to go to a regular court like
everyone else and file a claim!! U dont bring over to your state your file it in my county
you dont move me to you court? U think its fair to have the united states vs bob in a united
states court? Is there not a more neutral place than that? like a county court local to me? If
they are right they will have judgment in 21 days? Id urge the jury to tell the United States
of America to file in a regular claim court like everybody else has too!!
Ask for a trial in another countries courts because the clear conflict of interest that a unite
states of america court would have ruling over itself in a united states of america case?
Judges recuse themselves for less!!!
ask for a change of venue and to take their case to your local county court house!!where my
neighbourghs and my peers can judge me!! Just like everybody else!!
When u sue someone u have to go to their county and fileso that a jury of their peers can
judge them(fro their hood)
This is the reason why u need to know the rules of the game being played in the
neighborhood your in!!
In their courts their rules are designed for them to winyou cant speak, you cant ask
questions, you cant bring in exhibitits like asking mommyshe can deny or help at her
whim!! mommy the clock say 7 30 mom replyi dont care i say its 9 o clock and i make
the rules so if you dont like the rules i will hold u in contemp of court and take your house
and everything in the piggy bank!! And u r going to wish u played by mommys rules!! that
is the parallel!!
if the judgment from the irs court is granted by this court and this court executes the
judgment and grants them the order and their wish to seize my house, a man will be
harmed
This is mafia logicbecause i owe u a debt i can break your arm!!! This aint right!!! If a
judge thinks this is okay u go bananas!! because that is an outrage because thia is what the
Gambino do to you when u owe them a debt is to harm someone..government (judges)was
create by man (us)to protect man and his property(zero not a little not a bit zero not one
hair not one drop of blood)!!! How is this any different for the government to walk in with
their guns just like the mafia and take whats they want and have no consideration of me,,

132 | P a g e

just because i owe them $5!!? I owe them some piece of paper that not even back by gold or
silver??
How is that fair and just!!?? How is that okay to cause me harm!!
It is not okay to harm any many not matter what but specially for a debt!!! Its insane and
obscene!!
An accounting error is no reason to do man harm!! The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA cannot
show damages if u dont give them a house!!! But a man can!! And u must show the harm,
the wrong before one has a legitimate case before the court!! There is no damage to the
fictional entity!! They will be fine tomorrow and the day after!! They are a 2dimensional
piece of paper..nothing will happen to the USA or the IRS!! Because they are just 2
dimensional concepts!!
but everyone has to pay their fair share : but that is no excuse to harm man
Like when a girl says stop ..u have to stop or youre going to jail for harming her the same
rule applies here..u need to stop or this is going to harm a man!! Stop means stop!!!

If you think that just because you are shielded or clocked with a badge or that black robe or
some uniform and think u can cause harm to man because of that.. well that is obscene!!
That is not why we placed u in that position and function in society u better have a darn
good reason for harming another man!!maybe u were saving the life or harm of a another
man!! And it better not be over a debt!!!
If i lend someone $20 i cant break his legs for it when he cant pay!! In fact the question as to
why i lent that money if i couldnt afford to lose it? U cant just go over there and demand
their house now and break their legs!! Its obscene!!
Even if everyone is paying their fair share, that doesnt give them the right to break your
legs? Society may turns its back to us but not break our legs!! So if u want to shut me out
form services like welfare and that fine but u cant overtly hurt me!!!

Dont make any deals with the devil because he has every trick up his sleavethe irs will
not stop coming after you.. they will use every opportunity to take you home with
paperwork!!

If u do anything they ask u to do!!! Because that is instant u are submitting to their request
they have jurisdiction!! Dont surrender no matter what!! Die if u have to before u do
anything they ask u to do!!! Not one!!! I WILL NEVER SUBMIT TO YOUR JURISDICTION OR
ORDERS, EVER!!!I WILL NEVER SHOW THE WORLD THAT I OBEY YOU, PETETION YOU A

133 | P a g e

PUBLIC SERVANT,,,YOU WORK FOR ME!!! I PETITION ONLY GOD FOR MY RELIEF!! I dont pray
to judges!!

U can send my kids fingers in a box..i am not going to comply!! It will never happen!!

Will Karl was trying to gain possession of his kid he made sure that it happened in another
state.. so he had his kid flown out of the state because he had a feeling they would try to
plant something on him like 20 lbs. of meth and try and put him in jail for 20 years!!

3 of the last 4 governors of Alabama are in federal prison!!! Know who you are up against!!

Intercourse with the devil/government is dangerous AVOID AT ALL COST!!NO DEALS!!! NO

DEALS!!THEY ARE NOT HONORABLE!!!

In tax court the irs doesnt have to give disclosure!!

But in united states district court under federal procedures the irs has to (as a plaintiff or
defendant ) give full disclosure and have all the question he wants answered answered!! If
they dont testify they are going to get sanctions and eventually all their testimony will
become irrelevant!! And when irs fail to answer your questions its costing you $1000 a day
because its holding up your ability to create a defense for yourself!!! And u really need
answer so that you can have your right to a fair and speedy trial!!
if i was being evasive with answer then the irs could have all my computers seized to get
what they neededso u ask that all their computer be seized so u can get the answers you
seek!! U simply say u want to see if theyre doing this to anybody else, for the greater good
of society i want to see who else they may be doing this to!! This can help all the other
people who are being maliciously prosecuted by the irs!!I want all their records of everyone

134 | P a g e

who had their house taken by the irs to make sure this didnt happen to them too! I want to
see their case files to see if this is systemic or a pattern or racketeering!!!!
the plaintiff is the united states of America( because they are going to be forced to go to
district court and pursue you their) so that means you get to ask the united states of
America question!! How are they going to answer?
So one gets to find out who speaks for America?? Barack Obama?? What man answers to
that name??
because some man is responsible for coke cola!! So man man will have to answer for the
united states of America!!? (very interesting to see who will answer for America in that case)

Does the United States of America have the right to harm to a man if they simply owe a
debt?
They cant bring up any contract like the constitution because our names cannot be found
on it means the contract is implied not expressed!!It is simple being implied that i am an
American/Canadian not expressed and it must be expressed to be good law!
The united states is bound by a piece of paper..the constitutionA MAN IS NOT!!! So where
is it written that the creation [the united states of America] has the right to hurt its creator
[man] and still be allowed to exist?? Frankenstein had no court no jury and was destroyed
immediately when it harmed man!! The land, the people rose up and destroyed the
creature!!the creature has no right to complain because it harmed man!!!\

Government can carry on doing what they do but thye better get my consent before they
do!!! Let them have the persons of this society for god has no respect for them, then why we
should!!

The IRS

First letter to the irs

hi suzy, my name is bob how can i help you?

135 | P a g e

hi bob, im contacting you because u owe money

hi suzy, how much do you believe i owe?
hi bob, I dont believe you owe the irs does
i apologize i am not sure how i owe mr. or mrs. irs any money?
watch what they ask you to make cheque to non existent US TREASURY .department of us
treasuryi think the department of treasury is trying to dodge liability?
KL believes the irs is just trying to slow down our massive economic force by either burning
your cheques or blowing up bomb trying to keep us down
We never ask where the money goes that i sent the irs last year? What national debt? Where
is this account ? where did we borrow this from?(i did and thats why the lack of
accountability stops me from paying my property tax and i dont care that they bundle the
firefighters in there because it is either they are going to take it and be accountable or they
arent getting one cent of mine)

Only god knows whats true. If man created it (the irs) then it fake because we dont know
whats true we are just guessing. Unless god makes it, its fraud ..because we dont know
what is true?

In good law there are no synonims.it Karl Lentz not Karl Rudolf Lentz his fatherit is exact
or it is not..

If one doesnt believe in god this law stuff wont work.the courts only fear god ..why else
are they behaving?

Wheres the law that says I a man have to confess and tell you everything I did? Wheres it
say that I a man have to take pen and paper and confess all money I made this year? I didnt
say CITIZEN, I didnt say TAXPAYER, I said MAN.

Man is my title given to me by God, you, tax collector, have a tittle granted to you by some
other public servant.

136 | P a g e

Let.me.see.the.man. IRS? Bank? Wheres the man whos surety for the bank? Who has a
claim against me?
Are you saying that the man has to be surety for his claim, but the bank doesnt have to
show up for their claim? That I a man is surety for my claim but no one is surety for the
bank? We have to have equal footing here, its gotta be fair judge.

Just tell the IRS agent who is assessing us, that I need your signature on this that says I owe
this amount, Ill be glad to pay it. if youre wrong Ill need to hold you liable.

If someone is demanding of our property (making a claim), they must be demanding it by

rights. So we ask who has that right? nobody can do it unless they have the right to.

If they show us our statute? Cool, Im going to need a man to sign on paper that the statute
applies to me, in case theyre wrong, I can hold a man liable.

(dont say/write, but this is what well do: If I believe the claim be true, Ill be glad to pay
the amount owed; if I believe the claim to be in error, Ill be glad to take that man or woman
who signed for it into a common law court to verify your claim in front of a jury.)

Im not going to stand here and listen to complaints all day, but I love settling claims, I will
answer all claims tendered to my person.

If the irs says you are a citizen what does that have to do with one receives stressfull letter
form the irs? What does that have to do with me driving with a drivers license? Because at
the end they will never be able to producer the accuser..(the state) because they arent
going to appear and testify that i got a citizenship or social security? No they wont be able to
testify and neither can their attorney is court because the plaintiff must appear!! Lawyers
cant testify whether i have a citizenship card or if i rescinded or revoked it!!
At your common law court of record dont answer any questions about tax returns or
citizenship and ask if this decision can be appealed, then this decision is not operating under
the common law which is unappealable ..u bob(judge) have to protect my right because your
oath of office says u must protect said right if i evoke said right the by way of your
constitution article 7

137 | P a g e

Citizen is like saying u work for the usado you? I do not

So is the irs asking? Or just some agent?? Well if there is no irs then why would i need to
answer any questions?let them answer your questions first before u go incriminating
yourself let tehm go first in this little game.. u win because u the nature of a common law
court as they must appear and they cant so if they cant make u answer in court to those
questions then why answer those question outside of court??

If any man has rightful claim to my property let him come to a common law court of record
and state his or her case in front of the 12 judges, and maybe they will find for that man
and remember attorneys cant testify on their behalf.
When standing before the judge ask u r u represented reply with no, i am here to present
my case to the court. I have been aggrieved and i am here to request form the court to
create a constructive trust this is to take all the money between the two and hold it in
trust
The judge will say they understand. The lawyers are next in the introductions and then its
ones turn again ;
tell them your side of the story and then its their turn and when they go stop the lawyers
from talking as they dont have first hand knowledge of the relationship so they have no say
in this man on man case

Dealing with the IRS, and understanding courts of record

Say the irs is writing you letter saying they made some assessment
You write back notice i believe you are doing is extortion and i also believe this is fraud . u
are trying to claim i owe a debt which i do not believe i owe. Until some man or woman is
going to come into court and swear under oath or affirmation in an open court that i owe this
debt, ase i will work a settlement with that man.. but until that time i believe you are trying
to commit extortion and i also believe what u are doing is fraud and if you dont cease and
desist immediately, i am going to submit a case against you in a common law court of
record, because you ae causing me stress.
Now if i continue to get letters form you in the mail i a going to charge you $10,000 per
letter for compensation for the stress of dealing with each letter, as i see this as harm to me
as a man..because you dont have a lawful claim to my property.
THE BIGGEST WORD IN LAW IS WRONG USE IT!!

How to respond to a letter from the IRS

Kl it( the IRS) cant send you anything only a man or woman can.
Is there a signature on the letter from the irs?

138 | P a g e

If not u need to find out who wrote this IRS letter and who is liable for sending it to you?
Someone has to make themselves known to me? Because the irs isnt real?
Establish this by stating in earlier letters that you dont even know if the irs is a man or
woman because u never met no IRS remind me of how we know each other please and thx u
When the irs asks you to file you dont give them answer that show your understanding of
them at all..come off like an idiot who doesnt understand or else you are in danger of
bringing them to life.. dont make them real.. you are here to expose the fact that no man or
woman is going to show up at the end.. so from the beginning you are trying set that up for
the end the jury or the man in the black robe.

Even if you think that u wrote the irs u have to stop and realize u didnt write to a man or
woman so no u have never written anything to the irs so ignore those past letters.. start a
new line of thinking and chant to yourself THE IRS DOESNT EXIST and repeat till it sticks!!

If someone named bob sue sent u a letter that you own them money and have to file with
them.. the first thing you would do is write them back asking them if they are a man or a
woman and to remind you how they have any business dealings together. For the life of me
your name escapes me. please let me know as soon as possible. Thank you

The IRS does not take you to court

Its the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA that takes you to court as the plaintiff. The irs works for
them and then they report you to them. U invite them to tax federal court is what gets us in
troublewe need to invite them to our court

Who's the petitioner?

In an IRS case we are generally the petitioner. We file the paperwork, that places us as the
plaintiff moving the case. The IRS is defending itself against us, IRS is the defendant. Proof of
burden is thus on us.

139 | P a g e

Failing to file, and irreparable damages

many times irs charges people with failing to fileone must challenge the words
ambiguity..what is filing? How is putting pen on paper considered filing?
Ask the irs What does failure to file mean? I failed to file my nails on the deck of my boat?
What did i fail to file? Am i supposed to go to the irs in the flesh and physically file this in a
cabinet?
If there is more than one way to interpret that statute it is ambiguous and that mean that it
does not stand true.
Did government ask u to file ever?
They want you write a confession! Dont turn states witness on yourself..none can force u
too.
if a judge wants to give you an order tell him you conditionally accept upon a half of front
deposit for the cost of how much you want to charge for filling the form how long it may
take(time cant be restored once it is spent), and the judge bears all liability as you dont
know the tax code.

Dont file. I thinkbut what if the irs is holding your money how do you get that back?

Property tax
Ask any state after us for property tax to define property, and then define tax, and what is
property taxes? And how am I expressly written into that code? Show me.

Its something that says I have to pay property taxes that sounds ridiculous.

When I say to people is youre saying I dont own something? You believe youre letting me
borrow it? lease it? rent it? is that what you believe a tax is?

140 | P a g e

My belief in property is its exclusive to me and nobody else within society can make a claim
for it. my belief in what property is is obviously not what your belief in property is.

Hi bob Can you please define the word property and the word tax. Are you saying theres
some sort of a code between you and I that I owe you some money?
So we buy a piece of land and the government wants to tax us for putting a castle on it. We
write them a simple letter. Whats the value of the vacant lot beside mine? Why do you
believe you have rights to the equity I put on my land? What makes you believe you can get
something from me? technically someone built the roads, technically someone cut the trees,
but theyve all been paid already. Thats like saying I owe a debt to colombus for discovering
America. How does the county believe they have a claim to my sweat equity? No one who
built those roads were slaves, they all got compensated, theres no more debt anyone can
say I still owe to him.
Look if I built a car, and I sell it to you for 20k, I cant keep laying claim to that car after Ive
been paid. Because Ive already been compensated. There is no more debt owed to me.

In court if the IRS council asks us this question in front of the judge: is this paycheck here
in your bank account not considered income?, do we answer with a question? (since 3sec
silence is considered an answer). We say None of that is income. (income is for employees
of the state/nation, since we are not employed by the state/nation, we have zero income).
WE DONT TESTIFY AGAINST OURSELVES>>>ASK THEM SINCE THEY ARE THE DECTECTIVES
DONT ASK ME FOR A CONFESSION!!!

Income tax is based on a confession

The irs is only looking for you to confess, it is a completely voluntary system.if you dont
believe it, then it cant be true.and if you dont believe its true there isnt anybody else
who can hold you to anything else
If they are asking for a plea deal ask who are they offering the plea to ..i the man or the
defendant? Because the state has the authority and jurisdiction over the tax payer hence
they can offer them a plea but not a man.

Income tax

141 | P a g e

Income tax is whatever you believe it is.. the irs cannot say what is income only i the man
can what I say is income..its what u believe is income define how much income tax u
pay..hence if u believe you made income then you have to pay income tax..
u say u have no income then they have to prove differently. no one can verify anything
and u keep your mouth shut and win. Even when they pull up your bank account and point
to the deposits.. you stay silent as you dont have to turn state witness on yourself I am
not here to confess anything who says I do wrong?
because there are 6 or 7 different forms of ways money gets into your account..they cant
tell what is what, so they need you to confess to what is income.
ask them back if they believe its income?
they will admit they have no idea what your income is they want you to tell them.. dont
confess

One shouldnt be interested in how their codes define income

be an idiot.. no law compel me to understand it.. is there a law that says I have to believe
you beliefs? No i dont think so

now with the irs since they are the plaintiff they have to tell him the nature of his wrong in
detail. The IRS cannot say to a man that they did wrong
In writing who is making a claim, not in the past, right now that i do wrong?
If they respond yes we claim that you do wrong . reply withwhich of the you are you
talking about? Are you talking about i the man is doing wrong or i the tax payer is doing
wrong? Or i the person filling out the 1040 form? Who are you claiming did the wrong? tax
filer or the man? You separate yourself form the person and have the irs state who they are
going after..

Section 5- Government taking your kids and divorce and family court child
support and divorce 15pgs

- Using community based organizations as protection from the government

142 | P a g e

Get ur kid baptized if ur an ungodly man or woman and then ask the catholic church for
its help!!
Go to your Mormon if your Mormon. Jew if your jew. Islamic go to Islamic peopleYour
people!!

Centralized government is trying to move you away from the church!! The church is one of
your remedies!!

Never file an injuctionin court!! Because the moment u show up is the moment they will
arrest u and emand the baby or the wont let u goand the injunction could take 6 years
before they get to it never do an injunction!!!
Karl says whatever the government tells u to do ..simple rule..always do the opposite!!

When they come for your kids and u tell them to get a warrant and they say they are going
to get a warrantu have 15 min to get out of there and find a place to hide your child fast!!
Leave the state or pronvince fast and file your claim from the outside.. fighting florida in
florida is insane!! Careful!! When it comes to your kids!!

Say they take your kid and say they want child supportsimply ask for them to put it in the
form of an order and i will pay everything i owe and watch how no man will come forward
when u call their bluff.

U can pay any bill because all worth comes from manhis labour can pay the bill if they
accept it as payment but right now they only want cash and we are only able to pay with
sweat equity..offer to work for them..

143 | P a g e

The mere fact that i am a man means that i am great worth and value..i will perform to
compensate you but it will not be with federal reserve noteswhat service may i provide
with my handswhat service can i provide you? I cannot provide u a promissory note which
sounds ridiculous to pay when i can give you the man. The world does not know wealth until
he pulls it out of the ground man is the one who creates the wealth for the world the
world is just the world the moon is just the moon but unitl man shows up there is no wealth..
man creates the wealth how may i serve you in lieu of federal reserve notes that transfer
from my hand which i have a limited liabilitybecause if they federal reserve decides to
shut down tomorrow and stops printing money how can i then tender payment?

To be in lieu of something is to replace it or substitute for it. A restaurant that's run out of
clams might serve French onion soup in lieu of chowder. The word lieu originally comes from
the Latin locus, meaning"place," and its meaning has stayed true to its origins ever since.

U tell them u accept the debt u just want to tender them many offers of service in lieu of
federal reserve promissory notes..

How a letter would go

Put your address and their address

Dear mike -----,

As the man also known as the secretary of department of children and families; this woman
Samantha------- has trespassed and continues to trespass upon my property; i a man robin
Laurence Mitchell require of you to train, supervise discipline and monitor your
subordinates.. sign your name in blue ink and thumbprint

If this is my trial then i will do as i wish and let the jury be the judge of the manner in which i
conduct myself not you are u going to tell me that this is my glass of water and you are
going to tell me you have jurisdiction over it and you are going to tell me you are going to
gain jurisdiction over me and tell me how fast i can drink it?

144 | P a g e

If you are controlling this case judge it miust be the judge trial then!!!so you carry all
liability because u wont let me do what i want this must be your trial so that means again
he bears full liability.. if it my trial i can do what i want to defend myself the fact that u wont
let me clearly shows me it is your trial..so icant be my property if you are putting all these
terms and conditions on it!!! That iain tmine..its yours judge.

It is mothers property but dad has a vested interest in it[child] she put the physical labour
but he has an interest in it because he house and fed her..

if you give it back we can forgive this trespass

If u dont give it back this is what we are going to do to you. A dollar a minute for a
every second

Then give them the order

312 - Understanding your power in court when it's your case vs. when it's not your case

In their courts and rules you can only request not require..because i judges can deny you
any question and every answer can be yes and no
In law, interrogatories (also known as requests for further information) are a formal set of
written questions propounded by one litigant and required to be answered by an adversary,
in order to clarify matters of fact and help to determine in advance what facts will be
presented at any trial in the case.

If the irs ask question like did u make money last year u can answer yes and no during their
interrogatoriesie the reason being it depends on what they consider money and the never
ask that question!!

How much money? Respond that I dont know? so as not to make a confession..
If they want to be specific about everything they would really have to spell it out and they
cant because it is too much detail for a question!!

145 | P a g e

CPS trick==== trick them into giving them their cell number send the picture of the child to
fulfill their desire to see the child via email.. u see with your eyes not your hands so whne
they dont leave as thye promise they would after seeing the child you say u are not dealing
with them any more as they cant keep their word and they are dishonorable people
To touch they baby you are going to have to be indemnified, bonded ( makes sure through
the bank or a financial advisor that there is something actually attached to it, ensure its
legitimate funds are there and make sure it is in safe keeping in escort or priest)a to the
maximum that i believe is going to be fair to secure and protect my property from any
physical damage you could do to it and background checks because we dont just let
anybody touch our property. Just like if we had a ming vase!!! We would act no less with any
other property of i.. who is going to pay if you trip and fall and hurt my property and they
are in a wheelchair for the rest of their life??? That is why we need to be protected in that
manner i dont want to sue you in your courts with your prosecutor and judges and all
your friends that runs the state system. Once cps discovers it will cost one penny to get
the bond or anything else they will leave you alone.to many persons willing to give up
their babies out there)

They dont know how much it cost you to go get a new drivers licence so you say give me
$300 to hold for that drivers licence because that is what u believe it would cost to replace
it
U can see it for free with your eyes but u cant touch my license any other way..u can see my
baby from the window in the public commons but they are not allowed to come in to your
private property and thats all.!!!

indemnify
verb
past tense: indemnified; past participle: indemnified
1 compensate (someone) for harm or loss.
"the amount of insurance that may be carried to indemnify the owner in the event of a loss"
o secure (someone) against legal responsibility for their actions.
"the newspaper could not be forced to indemnify the city for personal-injury liability"

Write to the top dog like a governor an expect to be passed on to some one else more
specific like a director of CPS

146 | P a g e

See is different than viually inspectso trick them into using the word see!

If you get a letter back from say a governor or someone high up saying something to the
effect like we cant do anything for you and if u dont like it you should file for an injunction
through the courtsBrilliant attach this letter to your claim of trespass and say not only do
i believe so does the director of so and so..

If a cps worker wanta anything form you like a note from a loved on saying your fit and they
will give you you child back ( reply with the children/ my property isnt yours to give..we
dont negociate with terrorist) dont comply because they are looking for jurisdiction
how can a public servant require of the master public anything? And if it is a man trying to
order me i want just compensation and i will not do it because of any threat.. so if they tell
me to blink
And u will return my child i still wont blink even if i have to staple my eyes shut and never
blink for the rest of life..even if it means my life depends on it.. i wont..
Today they ask for one thing tomorrow you are going to want more crap..put your foot down
right up front

CPS takes your newborn property from the hospital, dependency hearing

If someone takes your kids make it a public record by going to police station and making a
complaint..
dont say anything about a child..just say your property has been stolen form you and if the
ask for a description..u say 2 days old 8 lbs 5 ounces but never your son or child in the
report..just property i u require the emmdiate restoration of property.(u dont know
anything about how the crime was done all u have is hearsay of who may have done it)
they may something at the station like we cant file this complaint reply we cant but i
can, there is no we

147 | P a g e

replyi am going to write the complaint and i am going to hand it to you and you are going
to file it and then you are going to report it to the proper authorities.. it youre going to
take it go through the proper chain of command ; then the prosecutor; and then the
prosecutor is going to determine whether or not thye are going to take the case and move
it.sooo take this up the food chain please

U file a compliant (do it local to where the crime happened) because u didnt actually see
them take your kid..u dont actually know who did it
But if u actually saw them take your kid you can file a claim and point the man out in a man
on man situation..

If CPS has one kid as is now looking to take your other kid..absolutely hide your
property/child with others even
the catholic church can help u find home and even medical help.but only the nuns as the
priest are usually drunk by 5the catholic church is thee biggest helper in world on those
matters(also the jehovaw witness and salvation army) and the state cant do a thing about
it!!! The church power!! U can abandon the child with the catholic and they will return it to
you whether its 10 years or 10 days no questions asked..dont ever try that with the state..
but family first if possible.

when they ask u where this baby is say u dont know? if i had 3 dogs and 4 cats dont
expect me to tell you where they are at, at all times..those animals are my property..dont u
worry about it..is this your property? Do you even know what property means? And if so do
worry about my property i will..is it state property? NoIs it your property? No.. so go to hell
and stop knocking on my door asking me question about my property!! I wish to be let alone
and u are now trespassing .. go..

generally 72 hours after they take your kid they give you a dependency hearing there is
where you will say your child is only dependent on mother and its your property and i
require the immediate restoration of property.is anybody making a claim that i do wrong?
If not then they have no jurisdictionno claim no jurisdiction.. dont let them correct u that it
is your childu say no its my property because i create it!! Does the sate believe it has
some interest in my property? So no man or woman has claim over it and certainly no
creation of man called the cps can make a claim for my propertyI AM THE CREATORif
you, man acting as a judge, know where my kid is and it isnt returned i will surely hold you

148 | P a g e

liable.. and as a judge you are a mandated reporter and i have just report a crime u have a
duty and obligation to report this to the sheriffs department and the local prosecuting
attourney that you heard form a mom that there is a crime commited.. PUT IT ALL IN
WRITING AND TRY AND GET IT NOTARIZED OUT SIDE OF THE COURT HOUSE BUT
PREFERABLY TIMESTAMP PAPERWORK AT THE COURTHOUSE IF U GET DENIED (SOME EXCUSE
ABOUT YOU NOT BEING AN ATTOURNEY) THE NOTARIZATED DOCUMENT WILL STILL HAVE A
LEGIT TIME AND DATE FOR THE STATEMENTS. Keep the original and you copy theres and
sign your document in blue ink so the color copy can pick up the difference..thejudge will
know what u are doing with this.. just write the word COPY at the bottom of the page and
keep the original

If cps wants to see your kid and they will leave u alone them for their cell phone number and
take a picture and send it to heru see with your eyes not your hands..

If they threaten to kick in the door say they are now communicating a threat
If they say if u dont open the door they will kick it in they are now extorting you..

Before the police officer come in they need a warrant signe plus u need a bond in case u
preak anything in the house and they need insurance that keep them safe in your house
making sure they dont get hurt in your house making u liable.. and all of this must be
cleared and bonds secured away from the situationnbefore they can come in

I dont think a single cps agent is going to have all those things!!!

The cops are asking you if you are saying NO..u respond that u would love for them to come
in under those conditions only.. never say NO!!

Cops:you dont want to work with us?

U: i want to work with you but it seems you dont want to work with me(flip it around)

149 | P a g e

Dont let them leave with you saying no because u are cooperating under your terms you
are simply making it impossible for them to do their evil work of taking you or your children..

And if they get all of that in order you make some rules ..no shoes..no gunsno robbery..and
you leave after you get what they want.

I follow court house rules take of your hat, stand and bow well now your in my house

Resolving child support issues

How it works with lawyers whenever u put something into the court your attorney writes it
up for you and you sign it.

Its not about getting out of paying child support ..it is a matter of control over your life and
property and not to place it in the decision making hands of some strange man or woman
acting as a judge for you!

Its common law that the girl typically stays with the mother until the age of 14 and then the
parents share custody 50/50 boys on the other hand after the age of 5 its 50/50 custody....

The family court system is their to support the family law system comprised of counselors,
therapistetc

Typically one party accuser the other so that they can throw in a 3 rd party guardian ad litem
and then your are really entangled in the system!!

150 | P a g e

A Guardian ad litem (GAL) is a person the court appoints to represent the best interests of a
child in a divorce or parental rights and responsibilities case.

In Ontario the law reads that if you are the child support parent and u spend less than 40%
of the time with the child then your child support should be adjusted accordingly

Try to settle with your spouse out of court use a parent or impartial party u can agree on
or let the lawyers bill you to death!!and the gov in your childs life besides the spouse will
look bad when they arent playing ball.
And more importantly if both parents are sying they are bad parents the state will jump in
and snatch your kids ..so someone has to remain honorable.let it be you!

Make sure you place a little safety clause when dealing with your attorney make sure you
sign without prejudice
If u have a contract or have a contract make sure it reads or have it rewritten to say that he
agrees that all times he is protecting your rights as a man.

Who ever issued the warrant is liable for it..that is why your child is your issue..u are liable..
a judge does it issue the warrant a man or woman and then you find out the man issued.
Special on your home which is your jurisdiction. So they better have that bond..

They will throw judges under the bus

Anybody getting in the way of u raising u child is a third party interloper..because this is
private not public..and if u have an existing contract/parenting plan just say i do not wish to
live another that contract anymore as i see no more benefit thank you.. so at this time i am

151 | P a g e

not under a licence and i am not under any contract with any public entitythis is
private..what my kid does with me is private and none of your concern..

Learn to attain domestic tranquility but under how to keep government at bayor else

My ancestor that lived in mud huts didnt need parenting plans!!! No do i!!

If someone give u a order to stay away form your children just accept it and say i am going
to demand compensation $1000 dolllars a minute ..send them a bill after complying one
daythey will drop that order so fast..

If your government has taken your children just know they are protecting man property so
make a claim for itthey [government] cant make a claim because they got no arms to do
so!!!

Even if they adopted your kid and its been 3 years get your property back and ask how
much it cost to maintain it and ask them to tender a bill to you it might be for $17,000 or
whatever figure, u say fine i will pay this but it may take a while as i can only pay ----- a
month and they better accept or u know what!!!

Karl explains what's going on with his Alabama case

The united states district court only has the authority to hear civil rights complaints.. on
pacer it is list as a civil rights complaint 440..

152 | P a g e

They may choose to convert your claim(360) into a complaint (440) tell them they have
trespassed on your case that they cannot convert a man claim into a complaint tell the
judge you will hold them personally liable if they continuealso let the clrk no to let your
case stand until u are ready to move it..u dont have the capacity and you dont have the
right
u tell them to dismiss that case because i am not going to move a civil rights complaint; im
not doing it for my benefit and i am not doing it for your benefit; I require u to dismiss this
case now ..

i as a man have no civil rights!!! I have rights given to me by god not some civil society!! I
wish to have no civil rights!!!they are a burden not a benefit in this occasion!! If i had civil
rights i would have duties and obligations to that society!! The only people i have duties and
obligations to is my family and god!! And that is enough burden for me!!

When the united states of America bring u into their courts they exercise the article sec. 18
what ever is deemed necessary and proper to maintain the order of government!!! Thats
why you dont go into there court you go in to your court at this public court house
building!!!

Bounty hunters are like the highest law in the land. If you have done wrong!!! Dean Clifford
got drag from one province to another to answer an arrest warrant bounty hunters will lie
to find you.. they may things like u robbed a bank ..that is the clue if it a bank robbery its
federal crime because its FDIC and that would get the us marshal to hunt you down..

Karl is doing this so he can actually get his case have us stand behind himbecause he
doesnt trust what Alabama will do because he is suing them for a lot of money!! He doesnt
want to die!!

If u have an incident where u called cops to ur house because of an altercation and your
buddy is beligerent to a cop because they were out of their mind. U basically opened
Pandora box.u see in public the cops are hired to maintain order...and that gives them
jurisdiction to handle u..but at home u have a foreign domestic. Cops know this is the most
dangerous call to go into because of the nature of someone being king of there own

153 | P a g e

castle..so they expect a man to fight real hard then... so it's not surprising to any cop...
make sure u stay in honor a offer to pay for the dry cleaning bill..
U can go in a represent ur friend as a next friend..
Write a letter...I did not have my full mental faculties and I assume liability for the matter
and if I did cause harm to a man can u please tender me a bill so I can settle a debt.
Next time hire a private security firm to handle (like brinks) instead of involving the public
or use of public funds for silly matters...u can sign up for a year..this is a nice gesture for the
courts to see..
If there is a warrant for ur arrest because u were in a insane asylum. ..all u do is voluntarily
turn urself an explain ur solid reason for why jurisdiction weren't there and they should just
reschedule ur court date..When police enter ur home they r challenging ur jurisdiction do
they should expect resistance r...it's understandable..
And cops should expect it.
But no matter wat if u cause damage ur responsible...
Man up to your liabilities. ..it doesn't matter that u were under the influence of alcohol.
.know one told u to get drunk..
Ur responsible. ..
When ur in ur home you're home under your domestic authority. In public depending where
ur at the custom may not permit toplessness. ..go to community like San Francisco if u want
to do that. The community has the right to say as a whole how they want to behave and hire
cops to say this is our territory...the public is saying this area is under there domestic
authority...
Look at Blackstone commentary and black law 4th edition for domestic authority doctrine

Restore property (kids) from other parent, notice in newspaper, accepting titles
I wish for my case to be sealed until I put it before a jury. Until then this case is to be remain
sealed, so no one can trespass on it. dont give me any opinions, dont try my suit on before
the jury trial.
Make sure we have our own case so we have our own standing, dont expect respect in their
case just like we respect no persons in our court.

- Wish for the government to restore property (kids) if based on a contract

Alabama code says anytime the parent(s) wish for their child to be returned because the
child was taken based upon a contract (they usually are), the children must be returned
immediately.

154 | P a g e

Because anytime a man wants to back out of a contract with the government, he can. A man
cant be a slave to the government. Anytime he wishes for the restoration of his property
from the government, he can. The code says do not offer the parents contracts and do not
hesitate to restore, if they do, the parents should take the agents to court immediately.

Can we use restoration of property to get back our money from the IRS?

When to use a notice, and Karl talks about his case against the DHR
Use their forms to get a case number, and then tell them I need to amend my claim, then we
put in the amended claim in next day.
If they accept our claim, we dont need to put any notices in; we only need to put notice in
when someone is trespassing on our rights. If everyone knows how to behave themselves
then we shouldnt put in a notice, thats like were accusing them. They know what to do and
what not to do.

Agencies cant believe, Karl sued DHR because he got a letter back saying DHR believes it
has done no wrong. Its talking like a man, so Karl brought it to court to prove in the public
that DHR is not a man, and to flush out the MAN responsible for this agency. The Governor of
Alabama is the chief executive officer of all state agencies in the state of Alabama.
(according to the constitution of the State of Alabama) If he says hes not in control of the
agency, then Karl will make a claim of the agency to snuff out whos actually in control of the
agency. Ill do whats necessary and proper to protect my interest, if the governor doesnt
govern it Ill govern it and make sure that it doesnt harm me.

Divorce in the public, and collecting a debt

If you want to divorce peaceably, and you and your spouse have agreed to separate, and the
court is giving you the run-around and trying to get you to get expensive lawyers: write to
the secretary of state hi BOB I believe youre the secretary of the state, question: I am
trying to find the correct agency here in the state of California in which could just handle a
simple divorce, and that we are no longer obligated to each others debts , what would be
the proper agency to communicate with to move this action forward.

155 | P a g e

The state is wishy washy on its position: in marriage a husband and wife are registered as
each others property, but a breach of contract (if the wife runs away) the state will not go
and get her back for you; but if a bank wants to go after you for your wifes debt then the
state will enforce it.

If we have a judgement but cant collect, we can get a warrant in debt against him so the
sheriffs department can collect for us; or we can put in a lien on their house; or garnish their
wages.
What is a Warrant in Debt?
February 14th, 2012 by Robert Brandt | 1 Comment | Filed under Warrant in Debt
What is a Warrant in Debt? As a bankruptcy lawyer here in Alexandria, Virginia dealing
with Warrant in Debts is something that I am all too familiar with. A Warrant in Debt is simply
a legal document that advises you that someone, called the plaintiff, is suing you in court for
money that they claim are owed to them. You are being taken to court in other words.
Once a Warrant in Debt is filed it usually means that a judgment and possibly a garnishment
is not too far behind!
What should you do when you receive a Warrant in Debt? Take a look at the upper
right hand corner of the Warrant in Debt. There you will find a date, known as the return
date, which advises you of the day and time that you are being summoned to appear in
court. At that point you have a choice, deal with this matter on your own, or contact a
lawyer.
What happens when I go to court on the return date? The judge will eventually call
the case at which time you simply want to tell him or her that you do not believe you owe
this money and that you want to set this case for trial. I repeat: do not admit that you owe
the money if you want a trial date. At that point a trial date will be given, typically about 8
weeks down the line and usually pleadings will be ordered as well. Meaning, the judge will
state that the plaintiff is obligated to file Bill of Particulars by such and such a date, and that
you, the defendant, the person being sued, must respond in kind with Grounds of Defense,
by a certain date.
The Bill of Particulars is simply a document in which the plaintiff lays out his version of the
facts to support his claim that money is owed to him. The Grounds of Defense is a written
response to the assertions made by the plaintiff. In this document you are supposed to
admit or deny each of those assertions made by the plaintiff and also introduce any
affirmative defenses you may possibly have. Bottom line: be sure to file your Grounds of
Defense with the court and mail a copy to the plaintiff. Failure to do so my result in a
judgment being entered against you even before the trial date.

156 | P a g e

What happens if I ignore the Warrant in Debt and do not go to court on the date
specified in the Warrant? If you do not go to court then you just made the plaintiffs life
very easy. At that point, a judgment will be entered against you by the judge. Whats a
judgment? It is a legal determination by the court that you now do in fact owe the money to
the plaintiff. Once a judgment has been entered your credit score takes a major hit. In
addition, you have now opened up the door for the plaintiff to begin garnishing your bank
accounts, or better yet, garnishing your wages. The person who sued you can now also
record that judgment in the county where you live, thereby creating a judgment lien on your
property. That last part, the judgment lien on your home, is something that not even
bankruptcy may be able to help you with.
How will I find out about the Warrant in Debt? Since a lawsuit is obviously a very
serious matter, after the Warrant in Debt is filed with the court, service of process must be
executed. What does that mean? That means that you must be legally served with the
Warrant in Debt. That means that the Warrant in Debt cannot be merely mailed to you, but
rather, the Warrant must either be handed to you by the Sheriff or a third party process
server, or it must be posted on the main entrance to your home. The court wants to make
sure that you know that someone is suing you and they figure that if someone like the
Sheriff personally delivers the Warrant to you or at least tapes it to your front door then you
will know you are being sued.
Will I always be aware of the Warrant in Debt? In other words, will you always
know when someone is suing you? You would think the answer is a resounding
absolutely, but in fact, there are many instances where the individual will not find out
about the Warrant in Debt/the lawsuit until months or even years down the line. All of a
sudden, seemingly out of the blue, they will come to find out that their bank account has
been frozen or their wages are being garnished. Then, upon further inquiry, they will
discover that Capital One or some collection agency for instance took them to court 14
months ago and got a judgment in their absence.
What happens many times is that the company taking you to court will accidentally, or
perhaps not so accidentally, rely on a outdated address of yours in order to serve you with
the Warrant in Debt. They then go to court claiming that you were property served with the
lawsuit, and voila, a judgment is entered.
Is there any way to undo a judgment that was entered against me without my
knowledge? Yes! If you can prove that you were served at a bad address like your former
residence, place of employment, etc. and not your current address where you reside, then a
Motion to Vacate the Judgment might be in order. If successful, the judge can determine that
the judgment against you should be removed.
I fought the Warrant in Debt as hard as I could but a judgment was still entered
against me, now what?Well, if there is no sense in appealing this matter from General
District Court (which is where Warrant in Debts are filed) to the Circuit Court since you
clearly owe this money and have no viable defenses, if you are not judgment proof, and if
you have a significant amount of debt in addition to the amount you are being sued for, then
bankruptcy at this point is certainly something you will want to consider. When all else fails,

157 | P a g e

you have the nuclear option at your disposal, which will typically wipe out almost all of
your creditors.

The government and your kids

If we have disputes between spouses and want to go to court, go in as owners sharing the
property that is our kid. When the state be our judge, we are in trouble.
Be wary of government benefit or help, there is no such thing as a free ride/free lunch etc.
For those in this mess: Thank you guys but we got this settled on the private side and
require immediate restoration of property.

Restoration of property (kids)

Are you threatening me? That if I dont do something you say youll keep me from my
property by force? Thats extortion.
If someone wants u to sign something u dont want to then say i want a billion dollars to
sign that document if u want me to carry out your orders to sign then i want fair and just
compensation

In child caseswant u want to do is immediately find out who is in control of the baby
more specifically ask who is responsible is my baby drowns in who is the baby care with? Are
they liable? Who do i sue if someones drowns my baby.. When u figure that out u say to
that person i WISH for the immediate return of my property! Then when they dont comply
you go file a claim against the person for trespass on your property by way of robbery and
there u go..dont put there gov title..just the mans name
Dont refer to the property as child kid baby offspring anything other than property the
government wont hear you

158 | P a g e

When filing your claim for property(children), list it as exhibit a. and say i will bring a copy of
exhibit a and u will bring it tomorrow and i will make sure the other side gets a copy of it.
That way the case can get filed as a claim.
They will insist it is a family court u say no where does it say i have to go to family court to
make a claim for my property.. they may want to define it as child i define it as property!!
Now who is making a claim court clerk? Are you making a claim or am i making a claim?

If clerks giving you trouble just mail it ..certified!!

Does filing a claim automatic evoke the common law and Queens Bench or is it only at
certain buildings?

If we got a standing order for custody, and the other side wants to change it, just hold up the
contract and say.no thanks we dont want to change it. There is an outstanding order, at
this time I do not wish for any third party intervener to find, alter, or change the original
order that was established in (insert divorce date). At this time I do not find it to be
beneficial for my person to alter or change or modify that order to accommodate that
persons wishe/demand. The order stands as it was written.

A writ of attachment or a writ of sequestration A writ of sequestration is a prejudgment

process which orders the seizure or attachment of property to be maintained in the custody
of the U.S. Marshal or other designated official, under court order and supervision, until the
court determines otherwise. The purpose of the writ is to preserve the named property
pending outcome of the litigation. The order binds the property of the defendant from the
time it is issued. The writ of sequestration will lay out what specific powers have been given
to the sequestrators to enable them to carry out the sequestration.
writ of attachment
n. a court order directing a sheriff (or other law enforcement officer) to seize property of a
defendant which would satisfy a judgment against that defendant.

U can ask for this in case u gave child services a hard time and u fear they are going to put
your children in the worst home they can just for revenge.

159 | P a g e

You order not motionfor them to be moved to somewhere safe!!

Walk in with the rules previously noticed to everyone before the day u show up and take the
left side but say I am taking the left hand side table but i want at no time do you think that i
am not prosecuting this case my claim that that property is mine. Regardless of where i am
seated if a proper doesnt come forth before this court by 10 am. The magistrate is to
recognize and witness to the court clerk that she is to stamp our order and deliver it upon
us.
Go to the sheriff and say we got an order..he will say that they need a writ of attachment or
a warrant in debt..
A warrant in debt is what they call it in Virginia when a creditor is suing you in General
District Court. Warrant makes it sound a little worse than it is, but it is bad enough. It is not a
criminal law problemyou can't go to jail; but they are trying to make you pay.
U may have to get a bond but simply go see a bondsman for the amount required and do it
up!
When u show up to court one may find themselves saying this excuse me did u not read
rule 2. That says if anybody has a claim that they should make sure that i get one as well as
the magistrate..why am i not getting a copy of the claim?? I am going to judge whether or
not i share this property or not..
so whatever proposal is being thrown around u see it and find not to your likingreply with
we have reached an impass and now we have a matter of controversy that is going to be
standing for all time between us. W are going to have to move this before a trial by
jury..does anybody have a problem being here same time next week? If not then get a jury
convened and get the show on the road? does anybody object to that?

u could hold trial at 3 am if u wanted toobut i say be nice

notice
Rules of Court (it denotes the judges and staff have duties, responsibilities and obligations
(not rights) to you and you yourself)

One can be in contempt of ones own court if we dont follow our own rules!!

160 | P a g e

robin court (lower case to keep all your rights) (use your last name is suggested)

so mitchell court at the court of the queens bench of British Columbia (as they type is
upper lower case or whatever)

one of the rules may be we are accepting any and all claims to.

Whomever has been assigned by the clerks court is to witness that no claims have come
forth and he or she is to bear witness and take my order and present it to the court clerk
and have it file it and return it to me that no claimant has come forth..

Now if the magistrate says they borught forth a clain well then tell them to look at the rule
that says if so then proceed to trial by jury.. show them u know your rules!!!

Citizenship vs. common law, and the merger of equity with common law
Citizen means member of a family, being a citizen has duties and obligations, puts you in a
hierarchy in the legal society of the state/nation.

1872 the attorneys make a play to take over the whole court system because no one needed
a lawyer in common law. Habeas corpus in short is the return of property.

If the property is called child or children then some 1947 UN doctrine of childrens rights
or some legalese nonsense will slip their jurisdictions into our house.
Then if we motion instead of NOTICE then we have just put ourselves under the
jurisdiction of their court.

161 | P a g e

Theyll use tactics like bringing our babies into court and tug at our heart strings to try and
make us sign some really compromising documents. Remember Karl, dont be moved, Ill
staple my eyelids if you ask me to blink.

CPS will make you an offer, and understanding rights to property

CPS will try to strike any deal with you.. they will try and make it super sweet and say things
like u let us stick our necks in once a year to see if all things are good..
u sign and u will get burned..
If no one shows up with a superior claim then that property is being held in naked
possession by some foreign entity and U order for the immediate return of property to its
proper place of jurisdiction at (insert address)
if they dont do it..sue them!!!
U stylize it for them to appear in the robin court; the robin court is going to convene on
(date); anybody who wants to bring a claim forth to said court may do so then.

Laws from a different system is irrelevant. Common law doesnt work in administrative;
maritime has nothing to do with family court; codes dont work in common law.

In a divorce proceeding the attourneys dont have first hand knowledge of the relationship
so they are out by default.. (trinsey vs, pagliaro case)

Understanding neglect and abuse

Neglect one neglects one work so one can sleep.. we neglect all the time..it is fine dont be
afraid of words

Abuse- is to handle something repeatedly until u cant recognize it anymore.. i abused the
tree trunk to make this chair.

So abuse it to change something from its original form so its not recognizable.

162 | P a g e

So how did i transform him from looking like a 3 year old toddler? What does he look like
now a roast beef sandwich? destroy the meaning of their words so no abuse took place!!!

And yes i neglect him i dont spend every waking moment with him? Why should i? i neglect
him all the time!! Its not a bad thing!! He needs to be let alone so he can learn and make
mistakes!!

Im sure u would like us to be pluggin our kids into some matrix where they are controlled but
until its you property and you have a vested interest in it , dont tell me what to do with my
property

NEGLECT, verb transitive [G. To let, to leave, to suffer to pass. The sense of the latter words
then is to leave behind, or permit to remain; I suspect the Latin To be composed of the same
prefix, as n is not radical in the latter. But of this I am not confident.]
1. To omit by carelessness or design; to forbear to do, use, employ, promote or attend to; as,
to neglect duty or business; to neglect to pay honest debts; toneglect our interest or policy;
to neglect the means in our power.
2. To omit to receive or embrace; to slight.
How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation? Hebrews 2:3.
3. To slight; not to notice; to forbear to treat with attention or respect. Among people of good
breeding, strangers seldom complain of being neglected.
4. To postpone. [Not in use.]
NEGLECT, noun
1. Omission; forbearance to do any thing that can be done or that requires to be
done. neglect may be from carelessness or intention. The neglect of business is the cause of
many failures, but neglect of economy is more frequent and more injurious.
2. Slight; omission of attention or civilities. neglect of due notice and attention to strangers
is characteristic of ill breeding.
3. Negligence; habitual want of regard.
Age breeds neglect in all.
4. State of being disregarded.

163 | P a g e

Rescue my poor remains from vile neglect

Abuse
ABU'SE, verb transitive s as z. [Latin abutor, abusus of ab and utor, to use; Gr. to
accustom. See Use.]
1. To use ill; to maltreat; to misuse; to use with bad motives or to wrong purposes; as,
to abuse rights or privileges.
They that use this world as not abusing it. 1 Corinthians 7:31 .
2. To violate; to defile by improper sexual intercourse.
3. To deceive; to impose on.
Nor be with all these tempting words abused.
4. To treat rudely, or with reproachful language; to revile.
He mocked and abused them shamefully.
5. To pervert the meaning of; to misapply; as to abuse words.
ABU'SE, noun Ill use; improper treatment or employment; application to a wrong purpose; as
an abuse of our natural powers; an abuse of civil rights, or of religious privileges; abuse of
advantages, etc.
Liberty may be endangered by the abuses of liberty, as well as by the abuses of power.
2. A corrupt practice or custom, as the abuses of government.
3. Rude speech; reproachful language addressed to a person; contumely; reviling words.
4. Seduction.
After the abuse he forsook me.
5. Perversion of meaning; improper use or application; as an abuse of words.

164 | P a g e

Police and the domestic authority doctrine

There is no such thing as domestic violence in a closed domicile its in public when
domestic violence occurs ony in there authority in public spaces not on mans property

Look up i think sec#84? domestic authority doctrine and domestic violence in corpus juris
secundum

One can deny the warrant because it is a different jurisdictional authority when u r on ur
property

In Syria the king wouldnt invite them in.. so America had its hands tided because USA
cannot interfere with anothers domestic authority without the invite its a NO!! the Syrian
king could be killing his women and children and there is nothing they can do

U just tell the police officer in your defense from accusation of domestic violence on your
property so you believe this is a public building u believe u have some sort authority of the
affairs of the state that operates in these four walls? Is that right? Dont u think i cant
smoke crack, smoke weed and grow crystal meth in here , is that what u believe as well?

Dont open the door for officers ..ignore it like kids who want candy at the door.. i dont see
any benefit of opne the door for these kids because i dont have candy.. just like i dont see
the benefit of open the doors for cops with guns who can potential now rob my house for a
robber

Now if they bust into your place without authority.. simply file a claim against them
(remember they will only have complaints) simple i am man named robin claim bob a man
trespassed; bob a man owes me a million dollars in compensation

165 | P a g e

Never refer to them as officer Bob just simply Bob

If you are trying to get the officers name and they are messing with you.. just write the
prosecutor and say dont i have the right to discovery? Dont i have the right to have a
depose or get a deposition from the officer?

Deposition
DEPOSITION, noun
1. The act of laying or throwing down; as, soil is formed by the deposition of fine particles,
during a flood.
2. That which is thrown down; that which is lodged; as, banks are sometimes depositions of
alluvial matter.
3. The act of giving testimony under oath.
4. The attested written testimony of a witness; an affidavit.
5. The act of dethroning a king, or the degrading of a person from an office or station; a
divesting of sovereignty, or of office and dignity; a depriving of clerical orders.
A deposition differs from abdication; an abdication being voluntary, and
a deposition compulsory.

Some stranger kicks in your doors u simply would file a claim bob kick in my door he
owes my $1million dollars

Dont sue the police department((it doent exist))

Sue each man(not officer) individually

Dont sue men (legalese)
Sue each man individually (each officers has about 1.2 million in coverage)

166 | P a g e

And because there are no statutes of limitation and nine officers break into your place
You have 9 chances at a $1 million dollar claim just do one at a time until you get one at a
jury trial
U can be a next friend in England its called a McKenzie friend in England
U set this up as one of your rules of court

Contracting your kids away through welfare

In administrative court (family court) they are just hearing administrating officers.
Most kids are contracted away..watch out when u take benefits form the government

they must produce a bond to complete the warrant because you are not part of their world
or court system..
if they want to come unto your land, which is your country hence your jurisdiction, they
better have a bond!! This is not the courts jurisdiction,, this is your land and you set the
rules there..
-in statute they are just using common courtesy because they are all honorable and do not
use bonds amongst themselves..plus they are legal fictions so no harm can be done to
them.
- but u may require a bond of anyone entering your property just on the basis that if they
dont any harm ( rip your home apart during a search or shoot your dog ) you can claim that
bond

-you may be asked to put a bond if you sue for big money and vice versa you may request a
bond. Because if you are wrong and filed a false claim I can demand the same of you.. if
you bear false witness on your neighbor they are going to want fair and just compensation..
Letter that helped get Canadians' kids back

167 | P a g e

-I require that the law produce the following, the findings of facts and conclusions of law if
you believe the answer is yes to any of the following
1. is there a law that states there was nowhere in Canada for a man or woman not fluent in
legalese terms of your legal society to move a claim or evoke the right of trial by jury?
2. is there a law that a man or woman have to belong or hire a member of your legal society
to move a claim?
3. Is there a law preventing a man or a woman if they provides justification and or excuses
for the robbery of another mans or womans property, to require that said robber to verify in
living voice in open court what moves them to rob said property and or have a lawyer testify
on their behalf?
4. is there a law that states that the court clerk does not have to provide their oath of office
or their hazard or security bond policy number.. and that they have the right to practice law
and read any man or womans claim, to judge whether said man or woman has the right to
press their claim in a public venue designe for the use of any man or woman requiring
justice and the immediate release, return and restoration of their property?

Section 6-Land rights- (Nations) 3pgs

Locke held that individuals have a right to homestead private property from nature by working on it,
but that they can do so only "...at least where there is enough, and as good, left in common for
others".[4] The proviso maintains that appropriation of unowned resources is a diminution of the rights
of others to it, and would be acceptable only so long as it does not make anyone worse off than they
would have been before. The phrase "Lockean Proviso" was coined by political philosopher Robert
Nozick, and is based on the ideas elaborated by John Locke in his Second Treatise of Government.

Adverse Possession
Adverse possession combines the abstract idea of rights in land with the real fact of
occupation on the ground in a manner that is inconsistent with the rights of the true owner.
An owner who neglects to exercise his rights of ownership and possession over all his land
may lose his right by the adverse possession of another. A trespasser who occupies or
squats on land may gain title to it if certain conditions have been met.
The conditions which must be fulfilled to perfect a possessory claim to land are actual, open,
visable, notorious, exclusive and continuous possession and enjoyment of the land in a
fashion which is adverse to the title of the owner. The onus is on the claimant to prove valid
possession of the property by meeting all the above conditions, that is, reliance is placed on
the strength of the claim, not the weakness of the owner's possession. Against the Crown,
the period is 40 years.

168 | P a g e

Definition of Conditions:
1. Actual Possession - The land must have been actually used by the claimants
without the approval of the owner. The use must be consistent with the nature of the
land and in a manner similar to the use a true owner might make of the land. Isolated
and separate acts of tresspass do not establish possessory title.
2. Open and Notorious - The use and occupation must take place in an open and
visible manner so that others, in particular the true owner, might know of or could
regularly observe it. The use and occupation will generally be widely known by others
in the area. The degree of notoriety will be consistent with the nature of the area in
which the land is located.
3. Continuous - The possession must be continuous for the duration of the statutory
period (i.e., daily, weekly, depending on the nature and location of the land). A series
of adverse possessors may be linked together to make a continuous period, if
previous trespassers followed each other in close succession in an unbroken chain.
4. Exclusive - The possession must be exclusive, not only with regard to the true
owner, but also all others. Random acts of possession by various individuals will not
meet the exclusive requirement for a possessory claim.
There are several mechanisms for an adverse possessor to perfect their claim, including
actions under the Quieting Titles Act, or a claim pursuant to s.37 of the Crown Lands Act.

Law of Common Land - England and Wales[edit]

The legal position concerning common land has been confused, but recent legislation
has sought to remedy this and remove the legal uncertainties so that commons can be
better used and protected.
Most commons are based on ancient rights, that is to say common law (coincidence of
term only), which pre-date statute law laid down by parliament. The exact rights which
apply to individual commons were in some cases documented but more often were
based on long-held traditions. A major reform was started in 1965 with a national
register of common land which recorded the land ownership and the rights of any
commoners, and two other significant acts have followed.
Owners of land in general have all the rights of exclusive ownership, to use the land as
they wish. However, for common land the owner's rights are restricted, and other
people known as commoners have certain rights over the land. The landowner may
retain other rights to the land, such as rights to minerals and large timber, and to any

169 | P a g e

common rights left unexercised by the commoners. The commoners will continue to
exercise their rights, or have a document which describes their rights, which may be
part of the deeds of another property. A number of commoners still exercise rights, for
example, there are 500 practising commoners in the New Forest,[15] and there is a
federation of commoners in Cumbria.[16] In many cases commons have no existing
commoners, the rights having been neglected.

Erection of Cottages Act 1588[edit]

There was a belief that if an Englishman or woman could build a house on common
land, raise the roof over their head and have a fire in the hearth between sunrise and
sunset, then they could have the right of undisturbed possession. [17] The belief was
actually a fallacy, but to stop landless peasants unlawfully squatting on commons, an
act known as the Erection of Cottages Act 1588 (31 Eliz c. 7, long title "An Act against
the erecting and maintaining of Cottages"), was introduced.[17][18]

Commons Act 1876[edit]

Under the Commons Act 1876 some 36 commons in England and Wales were regulated.
The act also enabled the confirmation of Orders providing for the inclosure of common
land or common fields and butts

Commons Act 1899[edit]

The Commons Act 1899 provides a mechanism of enabling district councils and National
Park authorities to manage commons where their use for exercise and recreation is the
prime consideration and where the owner and commoners do not require a direct voice
in the management, or where the owner cannot be found. There are at least 200
schemes of management made under the 1899 act

The law of property Act 1925[edit]

The Law of Property Act 1925, which still forms the core of English property law, has two
provisions for common land:

Section 193 gave the right of the public to "air and exercise" on Metropolitan
commons and those in urban districts and boroughs. This constituted about one fifth
of the commons, but did not give this right to commons in rural areas, which had to
wait for the 2000 CROW act.

170 | P a g e

Section 194 restricted the enclosure of commons, which would now require
Ministerial consent.[19]

Commons Registration Act 1965[edit]

The UK government regularised the definitions of common land with the Commons
Registration Act 1965,[20] which established a register of common land.
Not all commons have owners, but all common land by definition is registered under
1965 Commons registration Act, along with the rights of any commoners if they still
exist. The registration authorities are the County Councils, and when there is no
ownership, a local council, such as a parish council is given guardianship. An online
database of registered common land was compiled by DEFRA in 1992-93 as part of a
survey of the condition and wildlife of commons.[21] The official up to date Registers of
common land are held by the Commons Registration Authorities.
The following registration information is held:[22]

Land Section

This includes a description of the land, who applied to register the land, and when the
land became finally registered. There are also related plans which show the boundaries
of the land.

Rights Section

This includes a description of the rights of common (e.g. a right to graze a certain
amount of sheep), the area of common over which the right is exercisable, the name of
the holder of the right and whether the right is attached to land in the ownership of the
holder of the right (the commoner) or is a right held in gross i.e. unattached to land.

Ownership Section

This includes details of the owner(s) of the common land. Entries in this section
however, are not held to be conclusive.
Unfortunately, numerous inconsistencies and irregularities remained, mainly because a
period of only 3 years was given for registration submissions. However, there is there is
now an opportunity to clear these up under the 2006 Act, and to add land omitted under
the 1965 act.[23]

171 | P a g e

Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 (CROW)[edit]

Other than for those commons covered by the 1925 law of property Act, the public did
not have the right to use or enjoy common land if they were not a commoner. However,
the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 gave the public the Freedom to roam freely
on all registered common land in England and Wales.[24] The new rights were introduced
region by region through England and Wales, with completion in 2005. Maps showing
accessible areas have been produced, and are available online as "open access maps"
produced by Natural England.[25] Commons are included in the public access land now
shown on the Ordnance Survey Explorer Maps.

Commons Act 2006[edit]

The Commons Act 2006 is an important new piece of legislation.[26]
The Act:

Enables commons to be managed more sustainably by commoners and

landowners working together through commons councils with powers to regulate
grazing and other agricultural activities

Provides better protection for common land and greens - this includes reinforcing
existing protections against abuse, encroachment and unauthorised development

Recognises that the protection of common land has to be proportionate to the

harm caused and that some specified works can be carried out without the need for
consent

Requires commons registration authorities to bring their registers up-to-date by

recording past changes affecting the registers during a transitional period, and to
keep the registers up-to-date by recording new changes affecting the registers commons registration authorities will have new powers to correct many of the
mistakes in the registers

Sets out new, clearer criteria for the registration of town or village greens

Prohibits the severance of common rights, preventing commoners from selling,

leasing or letting their rights away from the property to which rights are attached

172 | P a g e

[27]

Several hundred square kilometres of waste land that was eligible for registration
under the 1965 Commons Registration Act was not, in fact, finally registered. As a
consequence, it ceased to be recognised as common land. A partial remedy for this
defect in the earlier legislation is provided by the Commons Act 2006. Under Schedule
2, 4 of the Act, applications that failed under the original registration process may, in
certain circumstances, be reconsidered offering, in effect, a second chance for the
land to be confirmed (re-registered) as common. Land that is re-registered in this way
will enjoy the special legal protection afforded to common land. It will also be subject to
the public right of access introduced by the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000; or,
may qualify as a section 193 urban common (in which case, it would also be subject to
a right of access for horse-riders).[28]

Fencing[edit]

The windmill on Wimbledon Common.

The act of transferring resources from the commons to purely private ownership is
known as enclosure, or (especially in formal use, and in place names) Inclosure.
The Inclosure Acts were a series of private Acts of Parliament, mainly from about 1750
to 1850, which enclosed large areas of common, especially the arable and haymeadow
land and the better pasture land.
The maintenance of fences around a common is the responsibility of the occupiers of
the adjacent enclosed land, not (as it would be with enclosed land) the responsibility of
the owners of the grazed livestock. This can lead to difficulties where not all adjacent
occupiers maintain their fences properly. However the fencing of land within a
registered common is not allowed, as this is a form of enclosure and denies use of the
land to others.
A celebrated landmark case of unauthorised fencing of a common was in 1866 by Lord
Brownlow who illegally enclosed 434 acres of Berkhamsted Common to add to his
Ashridge Estate. Brownlow had failed to buy out the commoners, so resorted to this

173 | P a g e

action. A public outcry followed, and the Commons Preservation Society found a
champion in Augustus Smith who had the inclination and the money to act, and himself
held commons rights. Smith hired 120 navvies armed with hammers, chisels and
crowbars, who on the night of 6 March 1866, under the aegis of the newly formed
Commons Preservation Society (now the Open Spaces Society), felled to the ground two
miles of iron railings. Soon after, local people flocked in. Lord Brownlow took action
against Augustus Smith and the court case lasted until 1870 when it ended with the
complete vindication of Smith.[29]

Controls on development[edit]
Development of common land is strictly controlled. The government states that
common land should be open and accessible to the public, and the law restricts the kind
of works that can be carried out on commons. HM Planning Inspectorate is responsible
for determining applications under the 2006 Act regarding common land in England, and
several other pieces of legislation regarding commons and greens. All applications are
determined on behalf of the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural
Affairs (Defra).[30]
Under section 38 of the Commons Act 2006, you need consent to carry out any
restricted works on land registered as common land under the Commons Registration
Act 1965.Restricted works are any that prevent or impede access to or over the land.
They include fencing, buildings, structures, ditches, trenches, embankments and other
works, where the effect of those works is to prevent or impede access. They also
include, in every case, new solid surfaces, such as for a new car park or access road. [31]

Boards of Conservators and Commons Councils[edit]

Some commons are managed by Boards of Conservators for the wider public benefit.
However, for areas where these are not established, or an improved systrem is required,
The Commons Act 2006[32] provides for the establishment of Commons Councils to
manage common land.[33] The Standard Constitution Regulations relating to commons
councils were formally approved in April 2010. Commons councils are most likely to be
useful where they can improve current management practices. This may be especially
so where commons are in agricultural use, but where it can be difficult to reach
agreement on collective management. Commons Councils are voluntary and can be
established only where there is substantial support among those with interests in the
land, such as; the commoners (especially those who actively exercise their rights);
owners and other legal interests.

174 | P a g e

Commons councils enable decisions to be made by majority voting, so relieving the

burden of trying to reach unanimous decisions. They will have the power to make rules
about agricultural activities, the management of vegetation, and the exercise of
common rights, which are binding on all those with interests on a common. [34]

Roadways[edit]

A parliamentary enclosure road near Lazonby in Cumbria. The roads were made as straight as
possible, and the boundaries much wider than a cart width to reduce the ground damage of
driving sheep and cattle.[35]

Commons are often crossed by unfenced public roads, and this leads to another
problem on modern pasture commons where grazing survives (or is to be reintroduced).
Historically, the roads would have been cart-tracks, and there would have been no
conflict between their horse-drawn (or ox-drawn) traffic and the pastured animals, and
no great difficulty if pastured animals wandered off the common along the roads.
However, these roads now have fast motorised traffic which does not mix safely with
animals. To continue (or restore) grazing, such roads may need fencing or at least
blocking at the edge of the common with cattle grids however fencing a common is
reminiscent of the process of enclosure, historically fatal to its survival, and permission
for fencing on a common is a strictly controlled process within the UK planning system.
[36]

Public roads through enclosed common land were made to an accepted width between
boundaries. In the late eighteenth century this was at least 60 feet (18 m), but from the
1790s this was decreased to 40 feet (12 m), and later 30 feet (9.1 m) as the normal
maximum width. The reason for these wide roads to was to prevent excessive churning
of the road bed, and allow easy movement of flocks and herds of animals.[35]

175 | P a g e

[11/28/2015 10:46:11 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: if someone says we did do
wrong..then next..where is the harm injury or loss? so someone may jump up and claim we
do wrong by claiming land.....fine then where is the harm injury or loss...if not then they
have no contraversy... discharge this case
[11/28/2015 10:55:01 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...:
http://www.alsa.ab.ca/publicinformation/easementsandrightsofway.aspx
[11/28/2015 11:16:09 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: http://homeguides.sfgate.com/writeproperty-deed-1499.html
[11/28/2015 11:19:29 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Easements and rights-of-way are
usually registered on the certificate of title to the property. They remain with the land and
are automatically transferred from one owner to another as the land is sold.
[11/28/2015 11:20:14 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: so we go to the local county
recoreders office and lookup existing easements on surrounding properties for how to get
existing access...
[11/28/2015 11:24:20 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: woooooohhh
must do homework at the county recorders office...before we squat....i mean claim land...
[11/28/2015 11:24:21 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: lol
[11/28/2015 11:24:23 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Will a building permit include
information about easements?
No! It is the responsibility of the landowner to know of any easements or rights-of-way that
may restrict uses of land.
[11/28/2015 11:30:22 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: It is necessary to review each of
these registered documents to determine the actual restrictions on the property. These kinds
of encumbrances, liens and interests may not be illustrated on the plan for the property.
[11/28/2015 11:33:22 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: You may wish to contact an Alberta
Land Surveyor or legal advisor for assistance. They are knowledgeable about right-of-way
and easement agreements.
[11/28/2015 11:33:35 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: land surveyors!!!
[11/28/2015 11:33:43 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: tehee
[11/28/2015 11:35:15 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: At the same time, a purchaser may
want to determine whether any builders liens have been placed against the easement
property. Such liens may affect the ability to arrange financing or to complete a property
transaction.
[11/28/2015 11:36:38 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: An Alberta Land Surveyor is fully
responsible for the accuracy of survey information. Land surveyors carry professional liability
insurance as added protection for the consumer.

Names and locations of Alberta Land Surveyors are found in theYellow Pages" under
Surveyors Alberta Land. For a province-wide list, call the Alberta Land Surveyors'
Association or visit the ALSA web site.

Look for power of attorney to make sure they are allowed to represent the bankthe could
be just a bunch of attorneys who bought the debt and are third party debt collectors.watch
out!!

176 | P a g e

If you have something deemed as a farm you dont need permits..so whatever structure you
put up there it is to aid and assist me in agricultural purposes no matter what the size..

Farmers got rid of daily savings time In state of iowa.

The electrical company may have to install electricity for their liability but u may remove it
after ur done

Or just simply say who says i cant and if so put it in writing who wants to administrate my
property without my consent?

Deed is in the name of a man not the bank!!

the mortgage note is in the name of the bank
Tell the bank to get their home off your land!!! They can easily do that these days!! Banks
cant own land
And u simply make a claim for your sweat equity that you put into the home..security up
keep!!! Those things!!
Its just like if the bank wanted to your car for another loan note..they could come on your
property and take it too..
There are all kinds of home moving companies out theredemand they use them!!!as it is
interfering with your enjoyment off the land and u are going to start charging them a dollar a
day!! Just ask them do you want me to mail it to you piece by piece or are they going to
come pick up the whole home?
But to get into my land youre going to need a permit that will cost u a million dollars a day!!
because i am the one who owns gives out permits on this land!!

177 | P a g e

Title holder vs. owner, and setting up a nation state

When u pay cash for your land and u go to the solicitor for the conveyancing for the title
deed.
On that deed they are setting u up for taxes for caring of the roads

Land deeds in uk title holder is -------, this document is to identify the owner.. title holder
means youre a lease holder the man but the owner is the crown.we have to remove the
states baby sitting help form the counsil

Send them a letter like this.. i know that the counsil works in benefit of man and mankind
but over the last few months i dont believe that is the case and i dont feel you have really
looked after me, so i have to make a decision to carry on with you or carry on without you,
and i have chosen to carry on without you and i have chose to set up my own nation
state

Note u need to own the land without a loan on itu need land bought outright..

If u learn to read your land title certificates you will see its wording is kind of tricky..it should
reveal that the state is the owner..or the crown is the owner what u are is the title holder
which is no more than a tenant so u have to make a claim that it is your property and bring
the crown to court where they cant appear and thus making yourself the owner..

I dont care if you recognize me, Im not part of your nation and Im not under your domestic
authority, I dont care what your opinion is and you do not have jurisdiction/control over me,
if you encroach upon me youll be committing trespass, and Im gonna hold you liable as the
man.

178 | P a g e

The City orders you to do maintenance on your yard

Cities generally have complaints fill out on us, not claims, so they cant move this in court. If
they make an order on us, we can get that order signed by the officer, and charge them for
the services rendered for the amount they originally wanted to charge us. If the officer
signed as a person of the department, the head of the dept. is now liable for the actions of
his employees, because the officer was signing on behalf of the office.
Because theres no involuntary servitude in this country, I dont fulfill orders for free.
Fair warning, ask without the threat.

Land is held in allodial > land is held in allodial title, someone gave it a title they can take it
away. Titles are not real, and are lower than claim.

ALLO'DIAL, adjective Pertaining to allodium; freehold; free of rent or service; held

independence of a lord paramount; opposed to feudal.

Land of the self governing

You trying to tell me what to do? Im self governing, you cant govern me. But you can give
me an order, and Ill gladly carry out your order for compensation. But Im not carrying out
public servants order, no Im carrying out another MANs order. You ordering me as a MAN?
Do it. Ill carry out your order and youre going to compensate me, heres the bill. If you think
Im not self-governing, and youre gonna force me to be governed and directed and steered
by your crazy beliefs? And your crazy codes and statutes? You think Im going to worship and
petition unto you like youre some kind of deity? I only petition god. But Ill never petition a
MAN or PERSON. Petition means youre inferior and youre begging a superior being. All my
paperwork is self governing. Are you trying to tell me what to do?

179 | P a g e

Land, property, and real estate

We cant own the ground, the ground belongs to the crown; the land is people, owning
people is slavery; we can own what we create above the ground; property is not land, we
own property we cannot own land; land is possession, I dont own the land Im in possession
of it?

POSSES'SION, noun The having, holding or detention of property in one's power or

command; actual seizin or occupancy, either rightful or wrongful. One man may have
the possession of a thing, and another may have the right of possession or property.
If the possession is severed from the property; if A has the right of property, and B by
unlawful means has gained possession this is an injury to adjectiveThis is a bare or
naked possession
In bailment, the bailee, who receives goods to convey, or to keep for a time, has
the possession of the goods, and a temporary right over them, but not the property. Property
in possession includes both the right and the occupation. Long undisturbed possession is
presumptive proof of right or property in the possessor.
1. The thing possessed; land, estate or goods owned; as foreign possessions.
The house of Jacob shall possess their possessions. Obadiah 1:17.
When the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful, for he had great
possessions. Matthew 19:22.
2. Any thing valuable possessed or enjoyed. Christian peace of mind is the
best possession of life.
3. The state of being under the power of demons or invisible beings; madness; lunacy; as
demoniacal possession
Writ of possession a precept directing a sheriff to put a person in peaceablepossession of
property recovered in ejectment.
To take possession to enter on, or to bring within one's power or occupancy.
To give possession to put in another's power or occupancy.
POSSES'SION, verb transitive To invest with property. [Not used.]

180 | P a g e

Property is two part: the right and the occupation. Gypsies have the occupation but not the
right. I may have the right to a thing but someone else might have possession.
We take possession of land, not ownership. Everything we build on the land is property.

The law is black and white, legalese is colourful. Man is colourblind.

Lawyers like to say lets be reasonable. NO. the law is the law.

I claim possession of this land, does anyone have a higher claim to this land than me?

If you have officers trying to trespass continually on your property send them an invitation to
come hang out for a simply admission fee of $100 over whatever.. it is no longer is a threat..

What to say when an agent comes on your land

when they start an whole lot of question you slow them down and get names firstnot
agent..namesthen if they ask you about something on your property respond with did
you ask me what is on my property? because right there he just admitted it is yours and
exclusive to all others within a societys control or enjoyment, by using the word
property..reply with so this means its none of your business by admitting this is my
property and that means you cant make any claim for it

181 | P a g e

The quiet title is if you want to claim abandoned property effectively. Just to make sure its
free and clear before putting a lot of sweat equity into something only to find out someone
else has a claim on it.

Ownership and titles

Quiet titles is like fighting for the bottom. It puts a bigger bullseye on your back. Anyone who
comes with a lien or claims to the house etc. can find you easily. They know the only person
they have to go for, they dont have to go after anyone else. Quiet title is applying for a title
from the system, you give the state jurisdiction over you. It clearly distinguishes that you are
the owner. Owning means youre liable for paying all the taxes all the bills. The chances of
the rich man going to heavencamel through eye of needle.
Accept no titles, titles given can be taken away at a whim of the bestower.

Instead of acquiring a quiet title, we ask to see if anyone can bring a claim on our house.

- Benefits of the second dimension

Dont rescind your name.. you birth certificate is prima facie evidence that you could claim
the land and its resources
They want you to get rid of your proof

Section 7-Courthouse proceedings and Rulings -filing claims, notices, dealing with
court clerks and judge talk 115 pgs
So help me God instead of swearing in
swear no oath and swear no affirmation: ONE CAN TESTIFY AND VERIFY EVERYTHING IN OPEN
COURT
matthew 5

182 | P a g e

33 Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but
shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths:
34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne:
35 Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King.
36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/394/147.html
SHUTTLESWORTH v. BIRMINGHAM, (1969)
No. 42
Argued: November 18, 1968 Decided: March 10, 1969
- See more at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/394/147.html#sthash.yQTd4Mz5.dpuf

A law subjecting the right of free expression in publicly owned places to the prior restraint of a
license, without narrow, objective, and definite standards is unconstitutional, and a person faced
with such a law may ignore it and exercise his First Amendment rights. - See more at:
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/394/147.html#sthash.yQTd4Mz5.dpuf

Deuteronomy: 19. 16. If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which
is wrong; 17. Then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the
LORD, before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days; 18. And the judges
shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath
testified falsely against his brother; 19. Then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have
done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you. 20. And those which
remain shall hear, and fear, and shall henceforth commit no more any such evil among you. 21.
And thine eye shall not pity; but life shall go for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand,
foot for foot. - Bible Offline
3 things out of the above scripture ...1 barratry 2 no need to swear since the judges must
distinguish..3 reverse the charges for just compensation
Where law written I man required to swear oath or affirm testimony?

183 | P a g e

Summons the trick..when you get it in the mailwrite back to the address and ask who are
you? And who are you to me?
just the IRS..
Etymology Edit
The word bank was borrowed in Middle English from Middle French banque, from Old Italian
banca, meaning "table", from Old High German banc, bank "bench, counter". Benches were
used as makeshift desks or exchange counters during the Renaissance by Jewish[9]
Florentine bankers, who used to make their transactions atop desks covered by green
tablecloths.[10][11]
[10:02:32 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Hey Wayfinder....if u have a moment....lovely
post on oaths...my question is..how do u address the oath or affirmation
moment...specifically wat do u say?
[10:06:50 PM | Edited 10:08:53 PM] wayfinder: hey bro, well i'm still working on it, and the
only oath i have given was when i was in the Army and one other association.
i've never made an oath or affirmation in court as they have only been traffic related.
However there are some good points about Oaths both for an against.
the following i found in a book, which is a good idea, but i'm still thinking about it:
"So, if asked to swear an oath in court, what should you do? If you wanted to be dramatic,
you could say, "As a follower of Jesus, all my words are to be completely truthful. Placing my
hand on the Bible and saying an oath will not make me any more truthful, for God always
demands my complete honesty. If, however, it pleases the court for me to swear this oath as
a public record of my intent to speak honestly, I will do so."
40 Questions about interpreting the Bible, by Robert L. Plummer, p. 223
[10:07:02 PM] wayfinder: "Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, 'You shall
not swear falsely, but shall perform your oaths to the Lord.' But I say to you, do not swear at
all; neither by heaven, for it is God's throne; nor by the earth, for it is His footstool; nor by
Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. Nor shall you swear by your head, because you
cannot make one hair white or black. But let your 'Yes' be 'Yes,' and your 'No,' 'No.' For
whatever is more than these is from the evil one" (Matthew 5:33-37).
[10:08:13 PM] wayfinder: but see the bible is quite young in comparison to other ways of life
and teachings, i'm just trying to find what is right and makes sense. but i feel making oaths
means some one is doubting you and your truthfulness
[10:08:21 PM] wayfinder: i'd wish to call that into question
[10:08:39 PM] wayfinder: hence i think the above as a reply is a good
[10:08:46 PM] wayfinder: what are your thoughts?
[10:10:08 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Beautifully put...
[10:12:05 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: My thoughts of late to to use the Robert Menard
vs... I promise to tell the whole truth with nothing left out as I see it.. but I can not swear for
or take oaths as it is against the word of God. ..
[10:13:04 PM] wayfinder: i guess that can make sense too, as it could be offending folk who
are christian in your presence
[10:13:31 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: My thoughts too...
[10:13:41 PM] wayfinder: it could be a trick to get folks to testify against themselves just
another nail in the coffin so to speak

184 | P a g e

[10:15:07 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: I luv wat u just posted except tweaking the last
line...as it seems to reverse himself in giving into the oath...
[10:15:55 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Zach. .my thoughts is that the oath....it's a trip
wire test...
[10:16:10 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Zact. .. notch zach
[10:16:14 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Lol
[10:17:01 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Thanks for sharing that
[10:17:18 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: And today's oath stuff.
Really awesome
[10:17:36 PM] wayfinder: "About the year 1360, during the reign of Edward iii. was written a
work entitled, "The Prayer and Complaint of the Plowman." This
work, although the name of the author is not
known, was evidently the production of one of the reformers of that day. It exposes many of
the vices and corruptions of the Romish church. One passage is to the following import.
Lord, thou gavest us a command to speak the truth, that our yea should be yea, and our
nay, nay, and not to swear at all; but he that calls himself thy vicar on earth, has broken
these commandments ; for he makes a law to compel men to swear, and teaches that a
man, to save his life, may forswear and lie. So that by the encouragement of him and his
laws, men are emboldened to swear and lie, and often to swear falsely.Fox, i. 459."
[10:18:42 PM] wayfinder: there is so much contrary stuff, the Roman Catholic Church are the
Central or 'matrix" of the whole lot so i wonder if it is a test
[10:19:08 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Wow.confirmation
[10:20:10 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: I don't care if KL swears I'm not going to...this is
exactly like the Lord's prayer case...trying to force Muslims to say the Lord's prayer
[10:20:28 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: I don't believe is key
[10:20:54 PM] wayfinder: i don't think KL swears he affirms
[10:21:52 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Well he does not address the importance of
this...it's like idolatry and wearing a Catholic cross...it's just wrong..borderline satanic...
[10:22:27 PM] wayfinder: that is why Karl says 'Oath **or** affirmation'
[10:23:43 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Za tly. ..neither is an option..both are false
choices
[10:24:23 PM] wayfinder: true
[10:24:52 PM] wayfinder: they are choices but you have to make the choice if the obligation
exists for them to be imposed upon you
[10:25:01 PM] wayfinder: i study zen :) and the middle path
[10:26:09 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: No man can impose their beliefs on
me...specially if I cause no harm injury loss or broke a contract by not doing so...
[10:26:27 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Like your post...who says I am lying?
[10:26:47 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: An oath doesn't determine truth of fact
[10:26:51 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Jury does
[10:27:55 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: This conversation is convincing me of it even
more...but I don't know how well the courts will take to my position...lol
[10:28:46 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: The middle is beautiful. ..but defining it is
difficult to cypher
[10:28:50 PM] wayfinder: it is not for them to decide really
[10:29:26 PM] wayfinder: it is hard to stay in the middle to, even the teachings of 'jesus'
writes about neither walking to the left or right
[10:29:32 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Zactly..the judge or magistrate don't. .so why do
they insist on this bs formality?
[10:29:47 PM] wayfinder: the middle path has been for thousands of years long before
Christianity was invented
[10:30:03 PM] wayfinder: because it is statutory
[10:30:11 PM] wayfinder: it is cermony
[10:30:20 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Wats statutory?
[10:30:31 PM] wayfinder: it is tradition, custom

185 | P a g e

[10:30:38
[10:30:43
[10:30:52
[10:30:54
[10:31:33
[10:35:16

PM]
PM]
PM]
PM]
PM]
PM]

wayfinder: Oaths
Robin- Easy isn't an option...: The oath and swearing....
Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Ah well then f it Fer sure
Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Lol
Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Do u see it in statutory? Where?
wayfinder: check out the following this is from Aristotle's Treatise on Rhetroic:

On the subject of oaths we may make a four-fold

division; for a party cither tenders an oath, and accepts it; or he docs neither; or he does the
one, and
not the other; that is, lie either tenders, but does not
accept it; or accepts, but does not tender it [p]. Moreover, it may happen in a different way from this still, supposing the oath to have been
previously taken by this or that party.
Now, an advocate does not tender an oath on the ground that men easily forswear
themselves; and because the other party will take it, and never repay; but that he is of
opinion that the judges, if his adversary does not take the oath, will give a verdict against
him: that he esteems the risk which depends on the judges the preferable one, for in them
he reposes confidence, but in his adversary, none.
But an advocate declines accepting it on the ground of its being an oath for a pecuniary
object;
[p] However strangely this wrangling for the administration of oaths may sound, at the
present day, when they arc uniformly insisted on, yet in the early periods of our own history
the evidence for accused persons against the king could not be examined on oath,nor till
the reign of Anne could any one accused of felony produce witnesses on oath. Edin. Review,
No. lxxxix, Art. 3, p. 79, 80. It was not till so late as the reign of Anne, that the English courts
were authorised to administer an oath to persons called by a prisoner on his defence.
[10:35:56 PM] wayfinder: and because, if lie were a worthless fellow, he would forswear
himself without more ado; since it were better surely to he a villain for some object, rather
than for none; for if he but take the oath, he will gain his cause, if he decline taking it, he will
not. Thus, then, his not taking it will be from virtuous motives, not from fear of forswearing
himself; here, too, the saying of Xenophanes is in point, viz. that this sort of appeal, made by
an impious man to a pious, is not fair, but is just such an one, as if a robust fellow were to
challenge an infirm man, either to strike him, or to get beaten himself.
3. If, however, he accepts it, the advocate alleges that he feels confidence in himself, but
none in his adversary. Let him also declare, inverting the saying of Xenophanes, that it is fair
enough if the impious man tenders the oath, and the pious man takes it; also, that it is
surely a strange thing that a man should be unwilling himself to take an oath, in a question
about which he calls on the judges to give their verdict on oath.
[10:38:18 PM] wayfinder: 4. If, however, he tenders the oath, let him insist that a willingness
to intrust the question to the gods is a matter of piety; and that his adversary need call on
no other judges, since he throws the decision of the case into his own hands; and that an
unwillingness to take an oath, in a question about which he calls upon other people to
swear, is absurd.
Now, as it is thus plain how we are to speak in reference to each [of the four simple cases], it
will also be plain how we are to speak when taking them conjointly; supposing, for instance,
either that yourself' are willing to take the oath, but not to tender it; or, if you tender it, but
are not willing to take it; or if you are inclined both to take it and to tender it; or to do
neither; for these cases must be made up of those above mentioned, so that our reasonings
must also be made up of those above stated.
[10:40:05 PM] wayfinder: https://books.google.com.au/books?id=kxHAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA102&dq=Treatise+on+oaths&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiK2cTizqPKA
hUh56YKHagjCdYQ6AEIPzAG#v=onepage&q&f=false

186 | P a g e

[10:58:31 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: By taking an oath they treat us like
prisoners...guilty...this is much like the dirty trick of ....are you here in person...
[10:59:20 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: I must field try this..lol
[11:00:10 PM] wayfinder: it does tend to seem like a trick shrouded in cermony, hand on
bibles or books, or some thing else.
[11:01:08 PM] wayfinder: AHAAAAA you took an oath, you swore, so you must be Roman
Catholic, this her is England and we outlawed Romans and Jesuites = you are now GUILTY!
[11:01:13 PM] wayfinder: hahaha
[11:05:13 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Yes..zactly...
[11:07:26 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Right!

[1:09:24 PM | Edited 1:06:36 PM] Julz: what do you say to a judge who tells you to sit down
at court?
[1:11:11 PM] Ivory Jett: I don't know. Please tell.
[1:11:56 PM] Ivory Jett: "Is that an order?"
[1:12:02 PM | Edited 1:14:14 PM] Julz: well if you're the claimer and it's your court just say: if
it pleases the court I think I will sit down;
[1:12:38 PM | Edited 1:15:12 PM] Julz: it pleases your court [in other words you] that you be
seated and rest your legs for a while
[1:13:24 PM] Ivory Jett: Why does it need to please the court?
[1:13:28 PM] Julz: and at the same time it fools judgy-wodgy into thinking you were obeying
him when in fact he is dead wrong
[1:14:05 PM] Ivory Jett: Oh... He is not the court. ;). Smart.
[1:14:07 PM] Julz: don't forget what court means
[1:15:13 PM | Edited 1:16:46 PM] Julz: court means: the aggrieved/claimerself [Cf.
person; status/capacity] and claim [Cf. suit] of i, [a] man [Cf. sovereign] [Cf. 5 Black, Law.
Dict. 318];
accused/wrong doer : (a ) has no claim, (b ) is part of claimers claim;
claimers claim comprises of all who are present;
all who are present are claimers followers;

INTERPRETATION ACT
RULES OF CONSTRUCTION
PROPERTY AND CIVIL RIGHTS
Duality of legal traditions and application of provincial law
8.1 Both the common law and the civil law are equally authoritative and recognized sources
of the
law of property and civil rights in Canada and, unless otherwise provided by law, if in
interpreting an
enactment it is necessary to refer to a provinces rules, principles or concepts forming part
of the law
of property and civil rights, reference must be made to the rules, principles and concepts in
force in
the province at the time the enactment is being applied.
Canadian Heritage
Home > Canadian Identity > Cultural Diversity and Rights > Human Rights
> The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
> Your Guide to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
> Section 3233
: Application of Charter

187 | P a g e

Section 3233
: Application of Charter
Section 32
Section 33
Section 32
Application of Charter
1. This Charter applies
a. to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matter within the authority
of
Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories
and
b. to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the
authority of the legislature of each province.
2. Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 15 shall not have effect until three years after this
section
comes into force.
The purpose of this section is to make it clear that the Charter only applies to
governments, and not to
private individuals, businesses or other organizations.
As mentioned earlier, section 32(2) was necessary in order to give governments a
chance to amend their
laws to bring them into line with the right to equality. Section 15 of the Charter
did not come into force
until three years after the rest of the Charter became effective on April 17,1982.

Provincial Court continued

2 (1) The Provincial Court of British Columbia is continued.
(2) The court is a court of record.
(3) The court and every judge have jurisdiction throughout British Columbia to
exercise all the power and perform all the duties conferred or imposed on a
judge of the Provincial Court, a magistrate, justice or 2 or more justices sitting
together, under an enactment of British Columbia or of Canada.
(4) [Repealed 2002-37-14.]
(5) The court is designated as the youth justice court for purposes of
the Youth Criminal Justice Act (Canada) and a judge is a youth justice court
judge under that Act by virtue of the judge's appointment under this Act.
(6) The court may sit at any place in British Columbia for the orderly dispatch
of the business of the court.

188 | P a g e

Ontario Court of Justice

34. The Ontario Court (Provincial Division) is continued as a court of record under the
name Ontario Court of Justice in English and Cour de justice de lOntario in French. 1996,
c. 25, s. 9 (5).

Provincial Court of Nova Scotia

2A (1) There is hereby established a court of record to be known as the Provincial
Court of Nova Scotia.
The Provincial Court of Alberta
The Provincial Court
2(1) There shall be a provincial court for Alberta to be styled The Provincial
Court of Alberta.

189 | P a g e

(2) Repealed RSA 2000 c16(Supp) s3.

190 | P a g e

(3

191 | P a g e

192 | P a g e

the Provincial Court of Nova Scotia.

A common law court of record has never been outlawed in this country.
Under CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM vol 25 section 344, Federal District Courts are courts of
record. A court of record has the power to fine or imprison for contempt. It proceeds under
the common law, not a statute or a code. The tribunal is independent of the magistrate.
Sometimes it has a seal, sometimes not. Those are the 4 elements.
[12/18/2015 6:47:43 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: [18/12/2015 8:26:54 PM]
Dead Beat Dads: "Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, 'You shall
not swear falsely, but shall perform your oaths to the Lord.' But I say to you, do
not swear at all; neither by heaven, for it is God's throne; nor by the earth, for it
is His footstool; nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. Nor shall you
swear by your head, because you cannot make one hair white or black. But let
your 'Yes' be 'Yes,' and your 'No,' 'No.' For whatever is more than these is from the
evil one" (Matthew 5:33-37).
Thats why you never swear an oath

193 | P a g e

ANd this is the way they also trick you to go against the Common Law GODS LAW (
to swear an go against God) and how they get you into their private world

<<<
The thing is, have to dig deeper, as ignorance is in the superficial 'understanding'
of the words.

"It remains to be inquired whether this practice, lawful and righ during the whole
period of the Patriarchal and Mosaci dispensations, has become unlawful and
wrong under the Christian dispensation."
[12/18/2015 6:55:28 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: [2:42:33 AM] David Man:
thanks ed that's good to know. thank you.
belief (n.) late 12c., bileave, replacing Old English geleafa "belief, faith," from
West Germanic ga-laubon "to hold dear, esteem, trust" (cognates: Old Saxon
gilobo, Middle Dutch gelove, Old High German giloubo, German Glaube)

<<<
the following is from my dictionary:

--------------------------------------believe. (denotes belief as grounded on testimony) give assent to, Credo. Have
faith in, trust word of, (man); put trust in truth of a statement, efficacy of a
principle.

To have a firm persuasion of any thing. In some cases, to have full persuasion,
approaching to certainty; in others, more doubt is implied. It is often followed by
in or on, especially in scriptures . To believe in, is to hold as the object of faith.
ye believe in God, also believe in me John 14.
To believe on, is to trust, to place full confidence in, to rest upon with faith. To
them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his
name. John 1:12
notice
cancel title

194 | P a g e

regarding: 'xxxxxxxx'

On this day, December 5, 2015, i: [a] man, Ross, hereby cancel all obligation to
the title of 'Defendant' or any such title, as i believe being so bound causes harm
to i, a man; i believe i am liable ONLY to my fellow man;
i wish to settle this matter out of court;
who says i do wrong?

i say all herein be true

------notice
idiot
regarding: 'xxxxxxxx'
i: [a] man, Ross, am an idiot to the Legal Society, its practices and procedures,
and the language of legal persons, Legalese, all of which i do not understand
i say all herein be true
------notice
not ready to proceed
regarding: 'xxxxxxxxx'
i: [a] man, Ross, am not ready to proceed; i require an additional 60 days to settle
this matter out of court
i say all herein be true
------notice
orders
regarding: 'xxxxxx'
Any man or woman who directs an order to i: a man, Ross, bears liability
i say all herein be true

195 | P a g e

----notice
representation
regarding: 'xxxxxxx'
Any man or woman who acts on behalf of i: [a] man, Ross, bears all liability
i say all herein be true
Husband is full liability.
Jeremiah 31:31-34King James Version (KJV)
31

Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of

Israel, and with the house of Judah:

32

Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by

the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I
was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:

Ask the judge if he is accusing you i f he starts to attack you along with
prosecution..just like jesus with pontius pilot..watch the judge back down..

matthew 27:11And Jesus stood before the governor: and the governor asked him,
saying, Art thou the King of the Jews? And Jesus said unto him, Thou sayest.
12And when he was accused of the chief priests and elders, he answered nothing.
13Then said Pilate unto him, Hearest thou not how many things they witness
against thee? 14And he answered him to never a word; insomuch that the
governor marvelled greatly.

John 8:1-11King James Version (KJV)

8 Jesus went unto the mount of Olives.
2

And early in the morning he came again into the temple, and all the people came unto him;

and he sat down, and taught them.

196 | P a g e

And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they

had set her in the midst,

4

They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.

Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?

This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down,

and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.
7

So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is

without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
8

And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.

And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one,

beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman
standing in the midst.
10

When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman,

where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?

11

She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin

no more.

The queen is a reflection of us the peoplenot the other way around..so if the
court is free for the queen then so is it free for the people!!!
Conusance
CONUSANCE, CLAIM OF, English law. This is defined to be an intervention by
a third person, demanding judicature in thecause against the plaintiff, who has chosen to co
mmence his action out of claimant's court. 2 Wilson's R. 409.
2. It is
a question of jurisdiction between the two courts Fortesc. R. 157; 5 Vin. Abr. 588; and not be
tween the plaintiff anddefendant, as
in the case of plea to the jurisdiction, and therefore it must be demanded by the party entitl
ed to conusance, or

197 | P a g e

byhis representative, and not by the defendant or his attorney. Id. ibid. A plea to the jurisdict
ion must be pleaded in person, but aclaim of conusance may be made by attorney. 1 Chit. Pl.
403.
3. There are three sorts of conusance. 1. Tentere placita, which does not oust another cou
rt of its jurisdiction, but onlycreates a concurrent one. 2. Cognitio placitorum, when the plea i
s commenced in one court, of which conusance belongs toanother. 3.
A conusance of exclusive jurisdiction; as that no other court shall hold pica, &c. Hard. 509 Ba
c. Ab. Courts, D.

Claim of Consuance..is when u have a common law suit before the court and they are talking
about tax codegive the man acting as a judge notice to bring it over the the right side of
the court

Claim of consonance
I demand that they respect the fact that this is a common law land and if they
dont like working in a common law land as a common law magistrate that i am
going to ask for your oath of office

Ok my mates case which has been going on for just under 12 months now where a firm of
solicitors had an order granted against my mate for defamation secured against his house
for 18,000, they come and stole his house last December and refused him the right to go in
to collect his belongings. They did this as they knew his paperwork was in there to secure a
conviction agaisnt a judge who acted outside of his public jurisdiction to work in favour of an
officer of the court the solicitor
They then to tried to say he broke into the property and caused serious damage to a door
lock, however the property at the time was still his property as we had voided the Judges
order
ANyway he was grabbed by the police, for them to interview him, but he stuck to what i told
him in case he was grabbed, and he was then put in front of the Magistrates to start off a
trial for damage. Now as this was happening we put in a claim of trespass against the judge
to which the courts kept throwing out saying we could not make a claim against a judge, we
resubmitted the claim stating the claim was against the man who just so happened to
preside as a judge, but they still would not accept it, however when they started the trial
against my mate for damages we put the claim into that case, they couldnt then throw it out
could they?
After about two cases where the other side were ordered to put in the facts to show my mate
had caused damage, and failed to do so as per the courts order, two trials took place in

198 | P a g e

which one of them they had me removerd from the court as they knew i was the one who
had done his court of record for him. Again another pre trial hearing was set and the other
side was ordered to submittheir evidence, agaion to which they failled, however each time i
kept submitting amended courts of record for my mate which they hated
Yesterday was his hearing, i was going to go but my own appeal case was placed on the
same day and i couldnt do two case 140 miles apart on the same day in five minutes. He
stuck to what i told him to do, keep your mouth shut and put everything on paper
The Judge kept refusing his paperwork, and so he got the court usher to give it to the judge
who just threw them on the floor and told the usher not to accept anymore of his paperwork
My mate then said " i object to this i require the court solicitor to be brought in to have this
man removed from the bench as this man cannot act under his PUBLIC oath of office to
protect the public. The Judge adjourned, my mate then put all of his copies of his Court of
Record on the Judges bench and came out. A Duty solicitor weas called to assist my mate,
he wanted to know all the facts of the case but my mate simply said thats not for you to
know your job is to make sure that man who cannot adhere to his public oath of office is
removed from the bench
When court was called back in the duty solicitor went in and had a word with the alleged
prosecution and then turned to my mate and said i cannot help you as i am an oficer of the
court. My mate then said does that apply to all solicitors to which he said "YES". My mate
wrote and alse stated in court that the court takes notice that all solicitors are officers of the
court, the court is in session today to hear a case for a solicitor to which is a major conflict of
interest. The Judge then turned around and said "case dismised" but tried to cover his arse
by saying it was dismissed to to the lack of evidence, and the fact the other side submitted a
picture of my mate which had no relevance to the case and told the prosecution to get rid of
the picture immediately

> KT = Keith
> JP = Judge
> BL = Bailiff
> BB = Bald Bailiff
> FC = Female Clerk
> OC = Off Camera (unknown)
>>> 0:00 mark
>> KT: No
>> JP: Alright, sit down please sir.
>> KT: Just Keith
>> JP: Pardon?
>> KT: Just Keith
>> JP: Just which?
>> KT: Keith. I'm here to ah correct a mistake by the court. [inaudible]
> First of all, the court has made a mistake.
>> JP: Are you Wilfred Keith Thompson?
>> KT: Ah no that's not what I normally go by, no.
>> JP: Can I see the information?
>> KT: That's a fictitious entity as in person, legally speaking sir I've tried to
> clarify this a few times but apparently the level of incompetence at the
>> JP: So your name is Keith Thompson?

199 | P a g e

>> KT: My name's Keith, that's all, nothing more, nothing less.
>> JP: You don't have a last name sir?
>> KT: I have a family name, a clan name. But that's irrelevant today.
>> JP: So, you are not Wilfred Keith Thompson.
>> KT: Okay, one more time, on/for the record, I am Keith... nothing morenothing less
>> JP: Then sit down sir. I'm looking for a Wilfred Keith Thompson.
> Please sit down sir.
>> KT: Actually I
>> JP: Please sit down sir. (loudly)
>> KT: Sorry can't do that. I served ah into the court this morning
>> JP: Sir

Jury nullification occurs in a trial when a jury acquits a defendant, even though the
members of the jury may believe that the defendant did the illegal act, yet they don't
believe he or she should be punished for it. This may occur when members of the jury
disagree with the law the defendant has been charged with breaking, or believe that the law
should not be applied in that particular case. A jury can similarly unjustly and illegally
convict a defendant on the ground of disagreement with an existing law, even if no law is
broken (although in jurisdictions with double jeopardy rules, a conviction can be overturned
on appeal, but an acquittal cannot).
A jury verdict that is contrary to the letter of the law pertains only to the particular case
before it. If a pattern of acquittals develops, however, in response to repeated attempts to
prosecute a statutory offence, this can have the de facto effect of invalidating the statute. A
pattern of jury nullification may indicate public opposition to an unwanted legislative
enactment.
In the past, it was feared that a single judge or panel of government officials may be unduly
influenced to follow established legal practice, even when that practice had drifted from its
origins. In most modern Western legal systems, however, judges often instruct juries to
serve only as "finders of facts", whose role it is to determine the veracity of the evidence
presented, the weight accorded to the evidence,[1] to apply that evidence to the law, and to
reach a verdict; but not to question the law or decide what it says. Similarly, juries are
routinely cautioned by courts and some attorneys not to allow sympathy for a party or other
affected persons to compromise the fair and dispassionate evaluation of evidence during the
guilt phase of a trial. These instructions are criticized by advocates of jury nullification. Some
commonly cited historical examples of jury nullification involve jurors refusing to convict
persons accused of violating the Fugitive Slave Act by assisting runaway slaves or being
fugitive slaves themselves, or for breaking the refusal of American colonial juries to convict a
defendant under English law.[2]

200 | P a g e

Juries have also refused to convict due to the perceived injustice of a law in general, [3][4] or
the perceived injustice of the way the law is applied in particular cases. [5]There have also
been cases where the juries have refused to convict due to their own prejudices such as
the race of one of the parties in the case.[6]

A tort, in common law jurisdictions, is a civil wrong[1] that unfairly causes someone else to
suffer loss or harm resulting inlegal liability for the person who commits the tortious act,
called a tortfeasor. Although crimes may be torts, the cause of legal action is not necessarily
a crime, as the harm may be due to negligence which does not amount to criminal
negligence. The victim of the harm can recover their loss as damages in a lawsuit. In order
to prevail, the plaintiff in the lawsuit must show that the actions or lack of action was
the legally recognizable cause of the harm. The equivalent of tort in civil law
jurisdictions is delict.
Praecipe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In law in the United States, a praecipe is a document that either (A) commands
a defendant to appear and show cause why an act or thing should not be done; or (B)
requests the clerk of court to issue a writ and to specify its contents. In Canada it is used in
place of a notice of motion as an application for a desk order that is granted in the
court registry without a hearing before a judge.
However in the United States Clerks are variously limited to handle minor precepts (typical
status adjustments) in the name of the Court (i.e., a Clerk cannot issue any forceful or
mandamus writ).
History[edit]
The word praecipe is from the second-person imperative of the Latin praecipio ("I order"),
thus meaning "order [this]." The word survived long after the Roman Empireand found its
way into England, where it survived in the English law. Today its function has barely changed
since Roman times.
The writ was often issued to amend or change a subsequent order or to correct an error that
may have been missed earlier. Its appearance in American law is not surprising, as many of
the English customs and traditions were passed on.

If you know not the names of things, the knowledge of things themselves perishes; and of
you lose the names, the distinction of the things is certainly lost.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------[Cf. Courts may be classified and
divided according to several methods, the following being the more usual: Courts of record

201 | P a g e

and courts not of record. The former being those whose acts and judicial proceedings are
enrolled, or recorded, for a perpetual memory and testimony[3], and which have power to
fine or imprison for contempt[2]. Error [writ of mandamus, or a writ of error, as opposed to
appeals] lies to their judgments, and they generally possess a seal[1]. Courts not of record
are those of inferior dignity, which have no power to fine or imprison, and in which the
proceedings are not enrolled or recorded. 3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas
Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex parte Thistleton, 52 Cal. 225; Erwin v. U. S., D.C.Ga., 37 F.
488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231. A court of record
is a judicial tribunal having attributes and exercising functions independently of the person
of the magistrate[5] designated generally to hold it, and proceeding according to the course
of common law[4], its acts and proceedings being enrolled for a perpetual memorial[3].
Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220, 175 S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc., Mass., 171,
per Shaw, C. J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689. 4 Black's
Law Dictionary 425-6 (1951)]
Thusly a court of record is a court which must meet the following criteria:
1. it has a seal
[Cf. 3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex parte
Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96
Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231.][Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426]
2. it has the power to fine or imprison for contempt
[Cf. 3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex parte
Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96
Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231.][Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426]
3. it keeps a record of the proceedings
Its judicial proceedings are enrolled, or recorded,
for a perpetual memory and testimony
[Cf. 3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex parte
Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96
Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231]
4. it proceeds according to the other four attributes of a court of record and according to the
larger course of common law (not statutes or codes)
[Cf. Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220, 175 S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc. Mass.,
171, per Shaw, C.J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689][Black's
Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426]
5. its tribunal is independent of the magistrate (no judges in a court of record)
[Cf. Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220, 175 S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc. Mass.,
171, per Shaw, C.J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689][Black's
Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426]
note that at a court of record a [JUDGE] is a Magistrate instead (in all common law
countries), and he is not the tribunal; the tribunal is either You the man who brings the
claim, or a fully empowered jury of ones neighbours [not paid for by the government],
assuming you require a jury which you dont have to, and i wouldnt suggest except on rare
occasions; a Magistrate in a court of record is not allowed to make any decisions, but in a
court which proceeds according to equity jurisdiction he has complete and utter
discretionary powers to interpret the law as he pleases and in that scenario what the judge
says at the end of the day is the law, which brings me to the second point; since only
common law is allowed in a court of record which is your court, that's why they have their
arraignment process via which they (a) get us through pleading to accept statutes [if you

202 | P a g e

choose any of those 3 pleadings you've agreed to the code and to the proceedings outside
the common law and inside every other law which includes equity as well as statutes], (b)
to strip us of our court and have us be in theirs at their mercy;

Tell a bailiff to back off or they will assume full liability as they are interfering with your right
to defend yourself.

Affidavits are only done by a man or woman..officers cnat make on because they cant be
cross examined on it..they can only make Deposition

U might be asking the judge are my unalienable rights completely in tact in this court?
he may refuse to answer with an outburst like: I AM NOT LISTNEING TO THIS DRIBBLE
there are only 3 knds of answer allowed in court YES NO ori have insufficient evidence
toreply to that
since the judge hasnt used any of those reply with what is not rebutted stands as true, let
the record show that my unalienable rights are fully in tact in this court.any more
resistance require the judge to i require yourpoint of law to arrive at your lawfull conclusion
and facts? he will be stuck..

If a procsecutor is saying the are representing the queen. Ask if that is the same queen
Elizabeth that is sworn to up hold the common law.... if they answer yes it is...continue
with... then she wont mind respecting my wishes to cross examine her as the common law
allows for and your legal world believes in as well i think its called habeous corpus
if a police officer ignores you are a man and u let the prosecutre know your are a man and
then you let a judge know you are a man and the legal system still ignore u and fines you
it is simply robbery by the man acting as judge cloaked in legality, but not the legal
societybecause they will throw him under the busspecially a trial by jury.scream this is
a robbery and the mandated reports better act!!!

Courtroom Etiquette

Over the centuries the English court system has developed many customs. The customs are
not arbitrary and can be summed up into one simple point: Consideration and respect for
the interests and concerns of all parties. By following the customs one will have a better
chance of bringing into the court a high degree of credibility, respect, and even success for
himself.

203 | P a g e

Not all of the customs are covered here. But here are some important suggestions that one
should follow:
Avoid Judge's Pet Peeves
Judges are persons, too. They have preferences just as you do. Click here to read about
some of their gripes.
Addressing the court
Unless you are so invited to do, never directly address the judge or any officer or litigant of
the court. You are not dealing with the individual members of the court. A court is defined as
the person and the suit of the sovereign. During court proceedings you are doing business
with the court as a complete entity. Therefor you address the court. When you address the
court, look directly at the judge, even if your message is to be acted upon by another
member of the court.
It is permissible to begin your address to the court with the phrase, "Your Honor." The judge
is the chief officer of the court. He is the contact point for the court. By saying "Your Honor"
you are merely getting the attention of the court and opening a communication channel with
the court.
It is possible to have a court without a judge. In England that would happen if the king
himself were sitting on the throne, conducting the proceedings. In America, if the judge were
absent, then the jury (if it is not an advisory jury) could either sit en banc, or appoint a
judge, or the jury foreman could conduct the proceeding himself. If no jury is present, then
the plaintiff (in his sovereign capacity) would conduct the proceedings, and all
communication with the court would be through him.
Comportment
Court decorum is a high priority. When someone is addressing the court, when he has the
floor, he is entitled to be fully and fairly heard. You should be like a statue. Nodding or
shaking your head, talking to others, reading, or otherwise distracting yourself or others is a
grave discourtesy. It is acceptable to take notes when another is talking. You can lose a lot of
points in the minds of others who understand court customs (you certainly do not want to
lose status in the mind of the tribunal). Attorneys should admonish their clients and
witnesses to never show any outward response to anything said or done in the courtroom. If
the opposition is lying through his teeth, you will get your opportunity to present your truth
later.
The court, through the judge or other channel, is always the entity with whom you are doing
business. It is acting in a sovereign capacity. As such, it receives no direction from anyone,
but acts on its own sovereign authority. When addressing the court, it is gross error to say
something like, "The court's attention is directed to...." or "The court will note...." It is also
gross error to so address the human who speaks for the court. If you want the court to take
notice of something, you can properly preface your presentation with, "The court's attention
is invited..." or "May it please the court...". Never say to the judge, "Your attention is

204 | P a g e

invited," because you are addressing the court through the judge, you are not addressing
the judge himself. It is ok to say, "Your Honor, the court's attention is invited...," because the
phrase "Your Honor" serves only to open the channel of communication.
The whole idea is that the court is in charge of things. You do not want to do or say anything
to challenge the sovereignty of the court--it will be resented. If the court does something
that you believe is unfair or wrong, the proper corrective response would be to object, or to
make a verbal or written motion.
Dress
Excepting for the robe, you should dress as the judge dresses. John Molloy's book, Dress for
Success is an excellent resource. A best seller, it is in all the libraries and book stores. Wear
a business suit, polished shoes, conservative haircut. Your appearance broadcasts your
attitude. You can be certain that if you look like a rebel, you will be so treated. It is a
discourtesy of major proportions to do as one litigant did in a San Francisco appellate court:
A 21 year old, on his way to the beach, walked into the clerks office wearing only bathing
trunks and sandals with long uncut hair. His response to criticism: "Hey! I have a right to
dress any way I want!" Yes, indeed. But, he didn't get what he wanted from them. Look and
talk like a lawyer; speak in formal or court English (not slang); appearance plays a big role in
winning your case. What's at stake is your credibility. Are you believable? Not if you sound,
act, and dress like a ruffian. Read more about that here.
Language
In America we are trilingual. We speak three languages: Street English (slang), Formal
English (taught in schools), and King's English (not taught in the schools, but used in the
court rooms).
Although they involve similar sounds, they are quite distinctive in how they convey ideas.
For example, in Street English if you think something is really good you can express that
thought by saying, "That's really bad!" Or if something's really cool, you say, "That's hot!"
Foreigners who have studied Formal English have a lot of trouble understanding local slang.
If you're from the neighborhood, then there is no problem.
If you want to communicate with someone from another neighborhood, then you use Formal
English. Slang is too volatile and localized for communication with folks from other
geographical locations. Formal English, because it is widely taught, is the best way to
communicate with a stranger.
If you want to communicte with the court, then you use King's English, also called the
Language of the Court, or the Language of the Law. It is a separate language and should be
studied as such. Changes in meaning can take as long as 300 years, so it is useful for
referencing precedent. Law schools do not really teach the idea that it is a separate
language. Consequently, even attorneys can make crucial language errors. Judges attend
special classes (called seminars) where they can be apprised of the the real game. If you
want to know what a word means in the court room, look it up in "Words and Phrases," a
multi-volume dictionary at the law library. Other useful works are Corpus Juris, American
Jurisprudence, and California Jurisprudence.
A useful exercise is to start at the beginning of the U.S. Constitution and look up each new

205 | P a g e

word in the legal reference books. You will be amazed how differently parts of the
Constitution will read when you become aware of the full legal meanings of words. Even
prepositions and conjunctions have been battled over in the courts.
Court relations out of court

There are many opportunities for contact with court personnel outside the courtroom
environment. The two most frequent situations are when you file papers with the clerk and
when you have contact with the opposition.
Whatever the situation, look your best and be your best. If someone wants to scrap with
you, just pass the opportunity by. Your case is in court, and that's where the fight will be....all
according to the rules. I always give them a friendly greeting. And I always am courteous to
them, regardless of their behavior. I learned this from the Buddhist leader in southeast Asia.
Here's the story:
Back in the 1970's and 1980's the Buddhist monks were very upset with the local
government. To make their point they would from time to time douse themselves with
kerosene and ignite themselves. This great suicidal act encouraged by the Buddhist leader
was a major embarrasment to the local government.
Normally, the local government had a simple solution for dealing with its enemies. It simply
kidnapped and executed them, usually around midnight. As far as the neighbors knew, the
victim simply was gone the next day, never to be seen again. However, the Buddhist leader,
who everyone knew was behind the suicides, was never touched. He went about the country
without the usual bodyguards that normal leaders of the country had. People marveled that
he was so troublesome to government, and so unprotected, and that nothing happened to
him pesonally. Though there was no definite answer, the speculation was that he was
untouched because EVERYONE liked him. The Buddhist leader was so likeable by both
friends and enemies that no one really wanted to kill him, despite the trouble he was
causing.
The lesson to be learned here is that it is important how you conduct your battle. Do it with
friendliness and courtesy. Even if your enemy would not hesitate to stab you in the back,
treat him (guardedly) as your friend. Let him be the uncultured fool.
If the court clerk refuses to file your papers because of some incorrectly perceived error,
then do it her way as long as you suffer no significant loss of rights. If you can't see your
way to do it the clerk's way, then simply ask the clerk to "FILE ON DEMAND." Normally that
stops all argument, but save that for last. Usually the clerks know what they are doing and if
you do things their way you will increase the probability of winning. If push comes to shove,
you can still file a motion with the trial court for mandamus under 28 USC 1361 if you are
the plaintiff, or with the appellate court if you are the defendant. At all times be friendly,
even trade jokes. You never know when that may pay off behind the scenes. More than once
I have seen court personnel do mysterious turnarounds when I thought I would never get
them convinced to do things my way.

206 | P a g e

Remember, the opposition is human, too. They will make their mistakes. Of course, you will
take advantage of their mistakes. But always be fair, friendly and courteous.
\

We should be wary of the 8 words we chose so they arent misconscued such as there their
theyre ,,,,,,you and ewebut what about i and EYE hummm????

Judges arent asking you if your are present or absent!! They are asking do you belong to
our society in a masked way to make you believ its a present or absent statement they r
saying r u playing by my rules trick question of jurisdiction!!!

In court point directly at the man/woman who took your kids, or the man who arrested you.
That man trespassed on me and I require immediate restoration of property That man
trespassed against me
Say 3 times in court.

Treat judge like priest, calmly with honour.

When an honorable man is judge, he is doing Gods work and protecting man.

Every single time ur dealing with the government call out the man if gov is sending u a bill
ask them who is the man who says i owe this? U want a bill of particulars of either the
service they have provided.. but ask for the bill first then ask for the itemized bill
explaining why? If the number changes u have fraud!!!

207 | P a g e

The bill of rights is limiting . Not everyone wanted the bill of rights because man does not
get his rights from them they argued that man would be confused that government had
some sort of control over manguess what it didread

We cannot assume that those who fought against a bill of rights were reactionary,
undemocratic, or anti-American, for some of the fiercest opposition came from the most
passionate civil libertarians. Some said a bill of rights would not guarantee but restrict
freedomsthat a list of specific rights would imply that they were granted by the
government rather than inherent in nature. They also remembered a maxim of common
law, expressio unius est exclusio alteriusthe mention of one thing amounts to the
exclusion of others. Guarantees of freedom of speech, press, religion, and so on might imply
that these were the only freedoms to which citizens were entitled. Others said that the
federal government could never be in a position to interfere with personal rightsthose
protections belonged in state constitutionsand that the Constitution should say nothing
about them. Why, asked Alexander Hamilton in Federalist 84, declare that things shall
not be done which there is no power to do? After all, the Constitution does not guarantee
the right to food or drink, but no one feels the need to protect them from federal
interference.

A constitution is the elements of a body

Who would care if coca cola had a bill of rights!!??

If someone brought up roe vs wade we would argue are u roe or wade? Who cares about a
decision in 1908?
The elements of the trial are completely different!!!! Kind of similar isnt exact.. !!! And we
dont know how to interpret their decision, maybe they stuck their tongue out and the judge
ruled against him? I dont know and we cant speculate because they have that authority!!

Get away from the word of manstop reading the constitution or the bible because they
were both written by mangod is in our hearts karls concept are common sense from the
heart where god put it

208 | P a g e

Look for common groundand write who is in charge of ithey bob i am going to be
accesing this public land and i am the publicand i am going top grow some medicinal
plantsdo u have a problem with that?

In the USA if the state want to take u to court u ask to go to the court of original jurisdiction
so there is no conflict of interest which is the supreme court of America.. the original court
of jurisdiction..

U.S. Code Title 28 Part IV Chapter 81 1251

28 U.S. Code 1251 - Original jurisdiction

(a)The Supreme Court shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction of all controversies
between two or more States.
(b)The Supreme Court shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction of:
(1)All actions or proceedings to which ambassadors, other public ministers, consuls, or vice
consuls of foreign states are parties;
(2)All controversies between the United States and a State;
(3)All actions or proceedings by a State against the citizens of another State or against
aliens.

Judges are going to interpret Obamacarethey apparently think they are smater than the
congressman who wrote it!!

Cnn politicsarticle
In a moment of high drama, Chief Justice John Roberts sent a bolt of tension through the
Court when he soberly announced that he would issue the majority opinion in the case.
About two-thirds of the way through his reading, it became clear that he again would be
responsible for rescuing Obamacare.

209 | P a g e

"Congress passed the Affordable Care Act to improve health insurance markets, not to
destroy them," Roberts wrote in the majority opinion. "If at all possible, we must interpret
the Act in a way that is consistent with the former, and avoids the latter."

So even if u master the codes they are going to interpret it however they see fit
Do ask a prosecutor to dismiss their caseu wouldnt want him to dismiss your case!!! Let
them do it on their own

Legalese..
Nolle Prosequi [Latin, Will not prosecute.] The term nolle prosequi is used in reference to
a formal entry upon the record made by a plaintiff in a civil lawsuit or a prosecutor in a
criminal action in which that individual declares that he or she wishes
to discontinue the action as to certain defendants, certain issues, or
altogether. A nolle prosequi is commonly known as nol pros.

When they call us a defendant they call you a what ....remind them that u r a who not a what
Corporations exist to benefit man...if they harm a man they will lose their charter (the
charter will get pulled and they will no longer be able to conduct business with man)..?
Congress and the irs is a what I only speak to a who...
Ask the man or woman acting as an irs agent thinks that I owe well says so in writing and if
ur wrong by one cent I am going to get u for harming man..

210 | P a g e

- Court trusts; law, codes, and beliefs in court

We are not here to dispute a police officers story...we are here the as what law I broke...
We don't use or interpret their code world. ..
They don't care wat we think about their code.. so don't use their hide as your opinion...
It's called code for a reason.
It's code for something else and we can't interpret it because we didn't go to school for it
Man didn't come from the Bible. ..or else how did aboriginal people settle their disputes?

If all parties agree u can do the trial over a phone or skype for the convenience..

f*ck equity!!! Its our claim i dont want a judges opinion of how to split something up

Write to the building manager.. the steward the chief judge..

Notice... when i hold court i am going to bring forth video cameras into my court.. the
courthouse might impose restriction to not film anybody else or the hallway or outside the
courtroom or the security booth
Or
during my proceedings i am going to have the aid and assistance of audio and video
recording equipment..

For the ease and conviniece of this court it is necessary that i bring recording devices such
as audio and video to aid and assist this court..

If the judge wont allow it ask for the find and facts and conclusion of law

211 | P a g e

If there is concern of liability..i will bear the burden of liability if something goes wrong do
you require i to post a certain bond or collateral in case of any harm or claim of any loss?

U better have your belief system tightthe judges are looking at you to see if you believe
their bullshit..ask the judge for his POINT OF LAW!!! Judges are trying to fool you with
bullshit. So make sure u repeat 3 times!!!

Thats my property and i have done no wrong!!!

Common law judges consider equity courts arbitrary

Equity and the common law represented opposing values in the English legal system. The co
mmon law was the creation of ajudiciary independent from the Crown. Commonlaw courts believed in the strict interpretation of statutes and precedentialcases. Whereas th
e common law provided results based on years of judicial wisdom, equity produced results b
ased on thewhim of the king's chancellor. Commonlaw judges considered equity Arbitrary an
d a royal encroachment on the power of anindependent judiciary. Renowned seventeenthcentury judge John
Selden called equity "a roguish thing" and noted that resultsin equity cases might well depe
nd on the size of a chancellor's foot.

Guiltymaybe i am. Since guilt means debt will someone tender me a bill so i can settle
the debt!!

Remember when u bring a claim into court and want to run it parallel the opposition can ask
to postpone the court and sty the proceeding for 21 days to prepare.

212 | P a g e

Ask the judge if this a common law land

Is it not true that the legal society does not have jurisdiction over a non legal entity?

Common law not English common law.

Only Canadians can buy land here!!! ( i may have to get my sister to buy it for me and then
sell it to the trust)

Stick to your story and dont change it by one word or it will be perceived as false or
unreliable..

If it was Elizabeth Alexandra Mary; born 21 April 1926 then she would never come in under
queen Elizabeth because that is a title ..she would come in as Elizabeth alexandra mary as a
man not a diminished capacity of the other titleshe aint stupid!!! Man is above king or
queen because kings and queen serve the people..kings and queen have guidelines but man
is unlimited not bound by some rules and obligations which might actually cause harm or
burden on me

Dont walk into their proceeding and object to them!!! Its not respectful!! Let them do their
little tap dance and sit respectfully!!!(this is church) and then you can get up and do your
two step shuffle and they will respect you too.
Dont limit their capacity by objecting!! As you wish not to be objected to in your turn

Dont huff and puff and whine and roll your eyes!!! Sit quietly and respectful as u are in
church..god is watching!! Look away and be still as a mouselike nothing is occurring and if
you were unphased by the 2D...ignore all name calling!!! They are looking for joinder to see
if u understand legalese!!they pull your string and u reactu somehow understood their
chinesse is what they are looking forjoinder..jurisdiction!!

213 | P a g e

By objecting you prove u understand what they are saying..

Act like they are talking chinesse to you and just say what ou would to a judge who only
spoke chiness to you i dont know what u are saying but are u looking for the legal robin
laurnece Mitchell or the man robin ,Laurence Mitchell? Ask questions!! Ur not replying!!!is it
true that the legal society has no jurisdciton over a non legal entity? Ask more questions
that set you up not replying to them!!
get judges right of the bat i cant understand what you are saying because i dont speak
legalese can we talk man to man?
Is this not a Judea chirtina society i am calling you out as a man for assistance!! In this
culture you have to help your fellow man!!

Jew didnt use to charge jews interest..that was for everyone else , outsiders cananites.

They are an honorable society all u have to do is to point out the bullshit so they know you
know..and they will let you go

We dont care what they are doing..let them do it so long as when they enter the plea that
they know they bear full liability for any burden or charge placed on me or harm that comes
to me so let them do it they are just playing the bluff card

If you force me to be the defendant then i am going to require fair and just compensation..

I am man evoke common law not the English Common Law, English capital E Common
capital C Law capital L but the common law,common lowercase c law lowercase l but the
common law derived from the word of God capital G. signed dean Clifford

U might see a magistrate bow to you!

214 | P a g e

prosecutors will entice u into arguments because if you argue then u bring them to life
ignore them too!!!

A judge will call u pathetic and an idiot to throw u this is the beautiful end!!! dont react
because you are going home..a real man does not get phased by words!!

Explaining yourself gives them authoritythey arent mommy so we are not explaining shit
to them
You will explain yourself if we are talking man to man!!

Mr. Mitchell!!! Is the name my mother gave me.if u are looking for the legal person with
that name that is not i ! i am not a legal person talking man to man!!

When they call ur name you ask DID SOMEBODY CALL OUT MY NAME?.......?WHAT NAME
DID YOU CALL OUT THE NAME MY MOM GAVE ME OR THE LEGAL PERSON?.......I DONT HAVE
A LEGAL NAME?.......IS THIS A LEGAL PROCEEDING BECAUSE I AM INCOMPTENT IN
LEGALESE? I HAVE A GIVEN NAME THAT MY MOM GAVE ME AND ITS ROBIN LAURENCE
MITCHELL AND I AM NOT GOING TO GIVE IT TO OYU WITHOUT JUST AND FAIR
COMPENSATION

No one arrested us those police officers trespassed upon i a man..now you place your claim
before this court that while you address this legal matter i also wish that you address this
tresspass against that man acting as the rcmp at the same time..
He may have arrested the legal person for doing something illegal..thats fine but the
problem is I am a man and that is a trespass without and affidavit on file that i have done
anything wrong!!

You broke some codewell u dont understand what that is because u dont speak
legaleseand there is no law that requires me to!! Show me the law because we arent in a
code land we are in a common law land!!!

215 | P a g e

As soon as they get a ticket their case(compliant) is moving forward where is your case (we
get to claim) ?
Compliants are not real witness to anything..ie like i thkng he stole my wallet..a claim is real
worldhe stole my wallet!! they complain we keep it real

I only understand one werd in legalese..idiot!!

Debt an guilt are the same..guilt is debt in germanso clear the man (common law) debt
then cover the publics debt if that has been cleared there is no reason for the court to
move forwardno debt no guilt.

"The German word for debt - 'schuld' - is the same as the German word for 'guilt'," he
explains. "To get into debt you have done something bad and that describes the German
people's attitude quite well."

U can only get your case discharged if you have a claim before the court.that way u can
show harm to a man
Otherwise u will only get a dismissal..

If there is a traffic ticketthey can harvest us with the ticket or the court time..either is
unacceptable if i am not going after compensationor else the crown has the ability to
fraudulently generate money

U can only injure your mail boxyou can only injury what is replaceable..harm to a man is
not replacable..like your time

216 | P a g e

Immediately attack a lawyer.the only know how to attack not defend!!! They are used to
facing punchin bag defendants..you are now armed with rights!!! Go get em for their
trespass but be as forgiving as jesus!!

When a judge wants to give you a title say thank you because defendant is a lovely title
(specially if someone gives you the heavy weight champchip belt ) but remember you will
have to defned it too!!! I wouldnt want to face the lawyer( the heavy weight number one
contender) because he is going to kick our butts!! So say thank for the lovely title but at this
time it would be such a burden as it would cause me great harm as a man to bear that title!!

We write these simple claims so we can easily repeat it without changing it when we say it
to stay consistentand the second is to get the lawyers to not take us serious because of its
size.. but the judge will take it serious

Its a good strategy to think of the legal society as the boyscoutsthey have their rules but
u dont care what they do or think about you because u dont belong to the boyscouts..thats
a total lack jurisdiction that the boyscouts have over you..

Ask the prosecutor if this is your property? (the prosecutor will probaboly do a great job
defending his case saying your property the whole time building your case!! Agree that this
is my property!!!

You might be to broke to pay for court and u could ask the judge to do a payment plan and
the judge may require financial disclosure

If it was free people might be frivolous with their claims paying is just fine to keep the
system going

217 | P a g e

How to screen jurors (framing the no allegiances question) ?

Reputation is very important, be good and honourable man in court, or theyll never let you
evoke the common law again.

When youve consented all the way into prison.

look Bob, youre a great judge, and then you for coming down and talking to the other day
man to man. But maybe I acted a little in haste to get out of prison. Honestly I cant live up
to those terms and conditions I agreed that I would abide by. So again Im talking to you as
your fellow man, if I do this, its gonna cause me harm; Im gonna lose income, Im gonna
lose time from my family and I know you dont want to hurt your fellow man Bob. So can you
please see to it that youre not gonna hold it against me if I have to travel out of the
province to see my family or driving my truck, so please write back to me immediately.

If the judge ask u if you are that person..reply withi believe that person was created and is
owned by the province of British Columbia ( if its your drivers licence). I can notify the
principal if that will help you..I think its the secretary of state or the governor or the prime
minister of british Columbia..

Tell the judge ..Bob you do see here my common law claim that that man who flashed his
blue light in my rear view mirror; he trespassed upon me and i require you to hear that
matter at this time as well

Isnt every piece of id a new person?

I require pen and ink and paper the properly put an answer before the court( so that it can
be filed and recorded
For all time)..(once it filed he cant rebut it..) but when it out of your mouth it goes on the
record then and only then!!! Judges generally read it out loud..

218 | P a g e

A person is a man, according to his rank in his society he owe duties and obligations in
which he is obliged to conduct and carry out and if he fails in those duties and obligations
they may impose upon him. So clearly this legal society is trying to impose on me as a man
who is clearly not a legal person

One must realize there is no legal society in Saudi Arabia but they do have a law society but
have no idea what legal is.law is universal legal is for a couple of hundred millions of
people

If you break a banks (private property) window the government cant come after you
maybe the insurance company could show loss and come after you.. but the bank is
indemnified and government hasnt suffered any loss so why is it drag u to court is what u
should ask

Dont smile at the judge!! Dont show any emotion or the judge will eat u alive..not even
when he has made his judgement because he can still still his mindwait until you get out
of court.
If a judge really wants to spank you he will!!! Be respectful we are in a public setting

U wont see a prosecutor jumping up for victory..its court room decorum

Judges are trying to make judges of us they are picking up where mom and dad left off..

Make the judge tell you why he is doing it ..dont try and spell it out for themu do this
simply by asking point of law?

Prosecutor may say we feel its unsafe to release this man back into our society its a dirty
trick

219 | P a g e

We dont want to be release into their society.

Remember judges and lawyers and cops HAVE DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS NOT RIGHTS!!!

HEY BOB ACTING AS A JUDGE, THERE IS NO LEGAL CLOAK ON ME!!!

The term void ab initio, which means "to be treated as invalid from the outset," comes from
adding the Latin phrase ab initio (from the beginning) as a qualifier. For example, in many
jurisdictions where a person signs a contract under duress, that contract is treated as
beingvoid ab initio.

It is my wish to go back to the status and standing of what i was before i encountered this
court; to that of being a man. I believe you maintain that position in statute in which you
would refer to as ab initio..( i am not maintain that position i am saying you are maintaining
that position)

Thank you for the lovely summons but I cant afford to move forward as a defendant but i
can make a general appearance and present myself as a man and there is law that can
compel me otherwise!!
Man is responsible for the actions of their person

Nice guy means fool!!!

If a man brings a claim then i will become the defendant!!

We are not here to dispute other peoples beliefs!! The officer believes i am operating my
vehicle and i was speeding, who cares..we are not here to dispute an officers belief! Al we
are going to say is prove it!!!
If they say u stole something well then they better bring a third party impartial witness!!

220 | P a g e

The first time any man opens up his mouth you say what man is speaking at this time? Is
there a man giving testimony at this time? Has he been sworn in today?...the judge should
say nobody is testifying today..

Judges never will testify so ask him to take the stand and testify it to be true!! If he did u
would have a chance to question himso ask away because he is no longe a judge because
only man can testify!!

All ask who is summoning..

The judge says what is your name? reply with my answer is before the court( in the form of
a notice or letter u sent during the administrative process)

If they bailiff walks towards you because the judge orders him you say if you touch me i will
sue you..u have no right to touch another man!!!i do not give u authority to touch me!!!

They may say we need to escort you out..replyi have as much right as anybody else to be
here and as a matter of fact i was summons here..i was invited here!! The summons is my
proof that i have the right to be here

Are u karl lentz? It depends on who is asking!! And i only have a duty and obligation to
answer my fellow man!!! Are u a man speaking to me?

Judge..this case is about the person/ corporate entity registered to you called karl lentz ( he
is basically insisting you have this title or any title).. reply with .. look i if you think i am a
citizen or defendant , well then i am going to evoke common law, i wish to no longer hold
that title as i dont feel there is a benefit now you are just dealing with the man before you..
so a person appeared for a micro sec and now its gone and a man stands before you..

221 | P a g e

I am a person but that person does not belong to your legal society or crown society i am
just a common law man and i do not have any affiliation to those society.. they may be right
but they cannot impose on me as i dont belong to their society..

Always have two courts going on at the sametime..it is the only way to really have a strong
position.. when they read the case at the end they will say guilty to your charges on the
admin side and not guilty and a discharge for your case( is said last)..

They will have civil code and the code of common law going on at the same time..

We dont care if we are guilty of the bar society rules because we dont belong to that
society

The judge has no jurisdiction or authority over a man to bind my person under your
jurisdiction..
So the judge is going to find me guilty in their world but the only problem is i dont exist in
your world!!

I dont accept the title of agent just be a man.

I am a person but person not of your society (sec. 32 of cthe constitution also reads it as
well) so you have no jurisdiction and no matter what your society says about us we are fat
or ugly or not guilty or guilty , were rich or we are poor or whatever ele it thinks because it
doesnt matter because u cant hold what u [bob acting as a judge] believe is a person under
your jurisdiction and control or hold us liable because i am a man and i have duties and
responsibilities to man and mankind and not to your society. We are outside of your society
we are idiots and u cant move somebody who is incompetent.that should be clear beyond
a shadow of a doubt!!s

222 | P a g e

Judge ask what ur are doing here then? Reply i have no clue because i dont speak
legalese and there is no law that requires me to speak in legalese but i have just told u that i
have no duty or obligation to speak legalese and this is a legal matter but i do have an
obligation to speak to a man ..so i ask is there a man before this court that claims i have
done wrong? Now if there is no man with a claim then ther is no point in me to move
anything further in through this court and u cant move anything against me i am a man..
Judge.U r free to leave this court whenever you want? Reply i am also free to stay here too
because u summoned me.
They summons the man!! And i rsvp and ask where do you feel you have the jurisdiction
authority to impose on i a Robin Laurence Mitchell a common law man?

To the prosecutor..I want the name of the man who thinks they can waste my valuable
time and threaten me with these financial charges?

A man and an attorney can be an agent and an attorney bears no liability

When u tell a judge u can only pay $5 and anything else would cause me and my family
great harm and i know this court doesnt want to cause harm to man.( dont budge)not
even if the judge says how about $6 reply with i am sorry but that is the most i can afford at
this time(because it will be seen as you going back on your word if u change ur answer
because ur answer is now wishy washy)

Accept all their charges as to be true..but meaningless because i dont belong to their
society so they cannot impose on me.

Whoever acts on my behalf assumes and bears full liability[let them do as they please
then]

You tell the judge i answer the court in writing before i came to court i stand on that and i
wish to remain silent..

223 | P a g e

The judge might ignore your paperworkand carry forth.Notice of error is next.

U.S. Citizens on a common law jury?

U want to your jury to consist of anyone who

Is a man and that he owes no duty or alligence other than to his fellow manand that he
understand that simple concept!!

One can hold a court anywhere!!

U r going to establish a court of claims in whatever the locals call a courthouse.. and u are
going to bring your court in theiri a man and my court is now at this public building known
as a courthouse

I am coming into this public court house and i am going to be filing a claim which if you
compare it with a article 3 court it is very similar in that( we dont know how to interpret
an article 3 court all we are doing is playing a guessing game because we didnt create
article 3)

When u get a judgement for $3000 U need to file a writ of attachment..that person has 14
-21 days to respond and explain why the writ of attachment shoudnt be placed upon you..
or certain terms and conditions that your will accepts a writ of attachment ($5 dollars a
month or else it will cause harm.) sometimes there are hearings..

Now if they fail to answer to the writ of attachment tell the clerk pass it on to the sheriffs
office and have them execute it

224 | P a g e

They may call it income i call it wages to stay away from legalese..

Nobody appears in person in your common law court..all masks are off

If you get a license for anything the government has jurisdiction!!

They are going to have to come forth and show that by u not folowinig code that u harmed
someone not conjecture!!

To the prosecutordid you write that statute? Are u trying to interpret that statute? Then
why do you bring the man who did and ask him if i violated that statute..and also show me
the joinder with i and that statute?

We are not interested in anyones interpretation who are we to interpret Picasso work
unless the man himself says so himself.. so your opinion or interpretation isnt relevant
unless u are the creator of it!!

I need the address of the majesty so i can send her a letter personally please?
Murder is one word.. simple charge very real crime
Victimless crime have lots of words like and an artificial heat source to speed the
fermentation of an alcoholic beverage without a federal permit
Look for a word that is implied vs expressed..just say u use a natural heat source!!

Give notice to the court clerk.i a man robin Mitchell want you to be aware that there is a
criminal complaint appearing in this court on this day at this time and to save the state
valuable resources that i wish to have this claim presented to the court at the same time as
this case number#------ is being presented to the court and that i wish and require that the
court clerk have both cases before the court at that timefor judicial expediency

225 | P a g e

The judge may tell you that they arent ready to prosecute and to come back in 30
days...just ask the judge to put it in the form of writing and sign it .. u now can give him an
itemized bill to pay
If elvis can get a reappearance fee then so can i.. if u liked my performance then i am here
to perform again!!

Only a man can set a court date..

We come in with our claim into your court and we trump your complaint!!

Is bob the man acting as an attourney trying to dismiss my case he better have a claim or
wait for the jury!!

Dont sweat the case number!!its for the ease of use for the courtjust ask what they are
trying to do..ie r u trying to dismiss my case!!

We are only surrendering our case to our fellow man!!

We are only here to talk to our fellow man not the attourney general ..is attourney general
your first and last name??

Dont let the clerk change your paperwork

We present ourselves not represent ourselves..

226 | P a g e

If someone interrupt and gives his opinion u quickly write him a letter saying this case is to
remain sealed until it goes before the seated jury!!!

If the us gov had a case on me and i asked u to dismiss their case on me u would laugh and
say u cant because it is not your case to touch!! You wouldnt tell the government not to
pursue their case would you? So why would you tell me? All you are offering is your opinion
and let it go before the jury as i believe they are going to love my case.. the jury will
determine the merits of this case not someone form the legal society!! We are not pleading
i am a man bring it forth to the public U dont tell me what i can use in my casethe
members of society is going to be my judge not you..no harm is going to befall the public
but if you believe this case is going to cause harm to a man or woman them tell me what u
require for a bond for this case to go before the public then tell me what u wish for the
bond?

Dont accept their wonderful lovely gift of a lawyermake them co counsil..

Adding Defendants and co claimants in court, appearing as a Person and man

Let anyone be a defendant!! If they want to admit they could be called wrong!!

But u can limit because of your limited resources and say u will do them one at a time

U can also add a claimant as well since they can add defendants..by filing an amended
claim!!

U could also just say you are a claimant and the judge will say he doesnt see your name on
the claim..just ask him for the paper and modify the claim right there by adding your name
to it and hand it back.. and ask do you see my name there now

227 | P a g e

Be respectful in court!!

The courthouse is public no matter how long the bar society has been playing in it for..
There is no queens bench building.. its where ever the queens is..

Dont be upset if the judges says the prosecutor cant answer your question because they
have a limited vocabulary and they cant use words like man and claim ..this is a good sign!!

We cant do this here!!! U say i am doing this here there is no we!!

Are u an officer of this court? (they should say yes)U do know i am not a officer of this court ;
i am not a subordinate of this court? I am not a defendant nor do i wish to be anything other
than a man!!

The governmnets benefits arent something we have to take..thanks but right now if i take
that benefit it will harm i a man..

Synonyms arent allowed in good law..illegal and wrong are two different things!!it must be
expressed not implied!!black and white and nothing in between

In their case they dont have to respond in a timely manner because its their case(their
property)!!!U move ur claim (ur own case) that they are moving a false claim against you!!

Dont move to fast and miss important steps..

228 | P a g e

A judge may want to give u a moment for discovery because when you move the irs into
your court they are going to be the plaintiff against you in a civil action you now have the
right to discoveryu can hold them in contempt of their court is they dont provide
discoveryuse the federal rules and procedures right back on them in their they need to
compensate u monetarily for not providing disclosure..

I can be a citizen in one second and change my mind and be a man in the next second..i can
change my mind of being the defendant instantly if i want to as well..u can change your
belief faster than you socks and no one can hold u to it.. because we are fluid and dynamic

The government can only make a complaint like a child..lol!!! man claims!! We are on top of
the food chain

Be responsible and dont charge someone and amount u cant cover if u lose.. go for $50 and
your property!!

Dont use the word allocution as it will only confuse.. this is simple a moment just before
sentencing where they ask if u have anything to say to the court before sentencingthis is
where u lay it on thick like the case has no jurisdiction and no man has come forth with a
debt or acussation short and sweet like your closing arguments....(mark walhberg has this
moment in Pain and Gain)

allocution
a formal speech giving advice or a warning.

The supreme court real job wasnt to do roe vs wade it was to keep the president and the
congress in check but they only do it with their opinions and the president may take it or
not..he is going to rely on article 1 sec 18 wat ever is necessary and proper..to by pass

229 | P a g e

Supreme court is to be the first court of jurisdiction if the state is coming after a state
citizen..how can u possible have a fair trial when the state is coming after you?

Judiciary act of 1789 sec. 31 clearly shows they also believe any claim can be prosecute
after the death of the original moving party!!

230 | P a g e

During 911 the insurance companies were only paying out $25,000 for a kids death when
they were insured..

Common wealth states move like lighting when there is a warrant on debt they are going to
move on you like lightning

Now if u claim your 22 year old as your property and they go out and do some damage
guess who is liable..

But u could write to the secretary of state and tell him my property is incarcerated what
bond do you require for the immediate restoration of that property to the public at large?

Everything in our court is done under oath and affirmation

If they want you to use their form put it on top of your case and write pg one. And write for
the ease and of use of the court clerks filing purposes only
And then another cover sheet saying this case is to remain sealed until it comes for the
before the trial by jury. It is not to be opened
And we dont want the clerk or magistrate or judges opinion..unless someone is going to
answer to my claim we arent interested
Court and courthouse are different words one is a building and the other is you rights

Blackstones, Her Majesty the Queen, claim and notice before the court
Blackstones Commentaries are just that, commentaries, one mans opinion. Its not the
word of god. Use for citation only, as exhibit. not only do I believe it to be true, Blackstone
also believed it
No dictionary definition beats the etymology of a word.
Doesnt matter how supreme the court buildings named, its fictional.

231 | P a g e

Affidavit is only ever heard in court (legalese), so its not a real word a real man should
use.
Notice is used by man.
Theres no synonyms in law, Monarch of Canada does not equal Queen Elisabeth does not
equal Crown. This must be expressed stated, not implied. Drivers license does not equal
Identification. United States does not equal the land mass.
Every question they ask is an opportunity for us to further build our case, a chance to make
our argument stronger.
Never bring 2D to life, require only of man, not title or office.
Whoevers holding our property unlawfully/in naked possession.
Ive never ever met the queen in my life, and shes accusing me of doing wrong?
If a Crown can accuse me today, a tiara might accuse me tomorrow.
If we dont put a notice of forgiveness of trespass, Im willing to forgive anyone of their
trespass, if they forgive me of my trespass.
This is what I a man believe
Our Father who art in heaven,
hallowed be thy name.
Thy kingdom come.
Thy will be done
on earth as it is in heaven.
Give us this day our daily bread,
and forgive us our trespasses,
as we forgive those who trespass against us,
and lead us not into temptation,
but deliver us from evil.
[The 1928 BCP adds:
For thine is the kingdom,
and the power, and the glory,
for ever and ever.
Amen.]

232 | P a g e

charges? does that mean i owe some one a debt? Judge yes u owe a debt to society
okay where is the bill? And who is the man who is going to come forward to say that bill is
true?

JUDGE no we are not taking testimony here today KLare we in a nisi prius court(doesnt
this demonstrate understading? I would stay clear of legalese) KLnotice i am here as a
man judge not noticed
If the bank is dragging u into their court..u drag the president or whomever is control into
your claim in your court at district court and their u will have standing..
A way to get the sale overturned is to go to the sale and be the only bidder then this
overturns your case when u file ur claim!
note when youre in front of a judge be absolutely respectful.. dont snicker and specially
dont ever bring the other side to life by reacting to them!!! They cant exist if you dont act
like they are their
One must see that they are in a room with nobody in it!! They are all fictions so keep it that
way!!!

When a judge is reading a verdict in a case that has both the admin and the common law
case.. what u will find is that the judge will say guilty on what ever the admin side first and
then call you and idiot on the common law side and set u free

Declatory Judgements are often written but the judges underling help or some retired
judge in a nursing homesoooo keep that in mind as you use them or they are used against
youu might say oh yeah i dont care what they think i will take it to the jury!!!and the DJ
goes out the window!!

How a man deals with the legal society, court, and government, securing the bond
You put in a notice before you enter the court..to the effect i a man robin, am here to settle
all verifiable true debts
Judge ask u how do you plea?

233 | P a g e

Reply with i believe i got the notice before the court in writing roughly 60 days ago, i am
just waiting for the man or woman to appear with a true bill and verify under oath and
affirmation and then if the judge is baffled turn to him and say do you need leave of court
so you can seek lawful and legal advice so you can understand that notice? We will take as
long as required!

Learn to shut oyur mouth in court..everything you say will be used against you. Cool Hand
Lukesometimes the best hand (in cards) is the empty hand

60 liened up judges because u dint like decisions..

70s a bunch of side drafts
The courts are tired of the freeman crap. Keep it clean and not crazy.
Careful because most dont understand jurisdictional shifts in their language

- Evoking habeas corpus, closing statements

Ask if the writ of habeus corpus has been suspended in this [admin] court?
A judge might say the writ of habeus corpus doesnt apply here
U reply i am evoking habeas corpus because i am a man!! I am electing to pull myself to
be outside and out of this case not in this case and now i am standing before this court as a
man and habeus corpus is now evoked!!where is the man accusing me of doing wrong? Now
i am evoking the image of god before youman created judge!

This is easy when you are a god fearing man.we only answer to god and as long as i have
not done anything wrong to a man and if i do i will beg for their forgiveness.. we answer to
our creator or our equal!!! U can be tired of playing the defendant role so i evoke habeus
corpus and ask is ther a man before his court saying i do wrong? No well then our business is
concluded here!!

234 | P a g e

If they threaten to continue the courts proceedings in your absenceu respond not in my
absence but in my unwillingness to be appear as anything other than a man. If u wish me to
appear as a man then i will and if they do then you better hope u (judge) have authority
over me [if you actually did harm another man] it better be your wish and order and i will
be glad to execute it

Judges know how to create a bill and settle a debt..they are honorable people!! They wont
welch on a betthey only have a face so you need to catch them with their words!! They
will save his face!!

U can be tired of defending urself up to the last minute and then challenge jurisdiction and
move out of the defendant title becoming a man!!

It doesnt matter if a mna is right or word ..if they say and do what they say they are a
honorable man!! Because they can keep their word!!

DONT DO 20 MIN CLOSING ARGUMENTS THE JURY WILL PROBABLY HANG YOU!! THE JUDGE
MIGHT INTERUPT YOU IN THE MIDDLE OF IT TO SAVE YOU FORM YOURSELF!! KEEP IT SHORT
U have caused no harm to a man, they trespassed upon your property, they have no power,
no authority and no right to enter another mans domicile or stop a man from moving where
he wants..never has and never will.. it doesnt exist; it never has and never will!! What we
do in the privacy of our own home is none of anybodys bizness!!and they should be
ashamed of themselves but they still do it anyway!! That simple!!!

Closing statements are supposed to be an impact statement..u could run your opening
arguments for days but not the closing statements u could bring in for opening
statements u can bring in a white board and make flow charts and showing what the
hierarchy with man on top of government is and what ur are going to prove and then what
the state is going to try and provethis is the big show!! Reveal the wizard of oz crap that
the government is!!

U can turn to the judge and have him interject in your closing statementhis answer to the
question has any man or woman come before this court saying i do wrong?

235 | P a g e

322 - Licensed attorney vs. non-licensed attorney

Hey judge can u tell me where lawyers get a license.. ask the lawyer beside u if u could see
his license to practice LAW
Law is just an opinion..

The bar is a private association and doesnt want to be licensed by the state so that they
cannot be controlled by the government!! They dont want to have any one establish laws
for them..or say who can get in and who cannot!!

Most bar association are private and dont have a charter with the gov!!

License is how own determines what is legal and illegal!! And only government can do
that!!
The boyscouts cant issue a licence because they cant whats good for society.. thye could
only make laws that apply to their members..

Only judges that go against the bar and in favor of man will loss there card..so they have to
attack you!!!

We must at the base level realize that there is two worlds at play a 2d and 3d world since
we are 3d we must always be striving to talk to a man and if a 2d entity is in front of you to
do not be insane and talk to a 2 dimnesional being in nothing less than the 2d dimensional
world of letter writing.. and thats how u get out of trouble with government!!!! Do not
manifest that 2d world they created into your 3d world because it will only get ugly

236 | P a g e

Judge issues an order but refuses to sign and date it, conditions of appearance

Give them the conditions of how u are going to be making an appearance. You are letting no
what god like entity is appearing before the court.. man is made in gods images and man
created judge to serve him and protect his property..the master is showing up to tell his
servants what to do.
.

When a judges ask me to appear as a defendant cant i just conditionally accept as long as
you inform the judge that so long as he bears on fully liability as for the defendant then you
will appear as a defendant if not i will simply appear as a man.

Just like akido... never head someone head on who is bigger and stronger because it's there
advantage... get out of the strength and attack their weakness... inversely when ur are
stronger than someone force them to a head on collision with u so u can win...if they chose
to side step a man because they can't face us...then so be it.

I cant be a defendant because no man has accused me of anything!!!

Evoke god in this land and u are in common law because we are in his image for as long
as we have it!!

237 | P a g e

If a judge doesnt recognize your notice..u say this notice isnt for your court it is notice to
the public and world at large!!!( Direct this to the judge also)In your court you are a judge
correct? He will say yes continue withThis is not a judicial notice..this is s a notice and a
notice is just a document that a man puts out to the world to bear witness!!i am not giving
this notice to a judge!! I am giving this notice to a man and all of mankind stating my order
and requirements!!!

There are no false claims because he believes it to be true!!! So what u want to say is will a
man in open court testify to what they are claiming to be true!

238 | P a g e

I dont understand or wish to understand legalese and no law can force me to!!

Just write i am an idiot in legalese if they try and put me under their system because u
used one of their words, well ur but the word to describe u is incompetent to stand trial!!

If a judge doesnt allow u to take a required leave of court.. ask him if he understands fully
that i REQUIRE
Not request and there is a big difference..

We dont want shit WE REQUIRE of you to perform your duties and obligations and place
the witness on the stand or we will do it for you!!
We are evoking by right by god because we are man!! And you are a judge and u will do it
because you have a duty and obligation .. and u will follow my order and fufill your duty and
obligation to give me the service ur supposed to provide or we will find somebody else who
will!!!i will do the act because require means i have the power and authority to do such an
act

What man or woman is saying that I did something wrong?

Plead guilty [so what if i did something illegal ] and ask who says i a have done something
wrong?

Officer cannot testify.because some police dogs have that status of officer!!

239 | P a g e

The whole deal with prosecutors is to make them bring u the man to appear and challenge
jurisdiction

No man will take on the liability in the government to tell me i cant have gold!!!

Catholic is better than public schools because at least they get closer to their understanding
of the system they are in..

People need to unite

The united states of America recognizez god . Bring in the resolution to prove it

CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982

(80)

PART I
CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and
the rule of law:

You only appear man to man in your court in their court u want to ask if there is a man
present (they will be no man just person judge prosecutor) so who are u going to talk too
because u only know how to talk to a man?

Dont look for an injured party look for a man. You dont care about evidence
when no man is saying i have done wrong!! Well then u dont have a case in my
court!! This is a godly land a common law land and land of man not a code land!!

240 | P a g e

When judge asks us a question (either for admission or yes/no questions), say I require
leave of court. This is not a request judge, this is a REQUIREMENT oh you dont understand
the word require? can anybody here in this room assist the judge in understanding the
word require?

When judge asks us do you want me to put witnesses on the stand? we say no we
REQUIRE, we want of no man, god provides my wants. We REQUIRE of you to perform your
duty and obligation to place our witness on the stand or we shall do it We have the right by
God because I am a man, and you have the duty and obligation because you are a judge
person.

The court want u to accept the title of defendant because they can have jurisdiction over
you ..they have no jurisdiction over man

Tell a judge ur not a member of his society so i dont understand ur legalese ..why dont u
just talk to me man to man?
The emperor has no clothes!!

As soon as someone summons you to appear it is an invitation at a certain time and at a

certain place...
The next thing u do is rsvp and ask them who they are and why they are summonsing you to
appear?
And who do you believe i am? And who do you think you are to me? I cant appear as a man
but i am incompetent to appear as a defendant

They will reply with something along the line as you are the defendant in this traffic matter..

Respond with .i would like too but i am a man and man does not appear in traffic court
because man has no duty or obligation to traffic code..

241 | P a g e

Void judgemnets dont exist in common law so we dont care about void judgements!!

Judges get voted in..they dont always no everything in law!!!

U can at any time challenge jurisdiction? Where is the debt instrument has it been presented
to the court?where is the accuser?

Judge ask for your bday..reply i dont recall but my mother says i was born oct 28 th 1972..

When to sue a judge

A judge has to be so out of character then u can get him for his performance it doesnt
matter if u like it or notbut it is still a judge. U get what u get i depends on the judge you
get u may have to help the train and taught judge to see a different way of looking at
things than he may not have known before..but u got what u get

- Benefits of co-counsel, acting in public, an attorney's defense against the IRS

If they give u an attourney allow them to only appears as co counsil and never let them
represent you..but u can let them appear with you

242 | P a g e

When your wrapping up with your closing arguments just clearly show that all the prosecutor
has brought is preseupmtion so rip apart all there presumptions all we ever got was offers
of proof but no testimony or proof

To the prosecutor Do the courts not have jurisdiction over the defendant or a man?
Because doesnt a man have rights but does a defendant have duties and obligation that u
can impose fines and penalties on it? Is this why u are asking me if i am the defendant? The
name of the game is to expose the fraud to a jury so it is obvious

Truth vs. true, conman, how the legal society is controlled, John's IRS case

Truth is what u witness but only god is knows what is true..

Conman is a confidence maker in your fellow manhe who gives confidence to do things
you wouldnt do.good or bad!!

Until i have seen a sworn indictment against me reading that i have done wrong or harm or
owe a debt or causing any one a loss?.i do not know who my accuser is and what have i
been accused of?

Let the everyone in the court room (jury and audience) know that they dont want you to
know that i a man require a written accusation against me a sworn statement and that if the
prosecutor doesnt have this that there is no reason for us to be here!!

Look i am not going to answer any more question because u have failed to produce my
accuser!! [ your basically using the stand to further your position on the record]

243 | P a g e

Barter i will answer one more question if you promise to bring my accuser so i can face
them!!! They wont be able to play that cardif they do then reneg call them a dishonorable
person

If a prosecutor is objecting to your testimony u invite him to take the stand because he
thinks i am telling that you are not teling the truth when i am up there trying to not go to
prison. Why dont you come up here and take the stand and bare the same liability under
oath????{ they should coward form the proposition}

If you are being objected too..u say i have not objected to them when they were telling there
side of the story trying to make me a monster..why cant i know say my side of the story..why
am i being interfered with my right to let the people know what i believe so they can judge
me on the merit of my beliefs ..so stop calling me a liar!! My belief are hearsay of course
they are..if i believe that jesus is coming back that is my belief and yes that is speculation
and hear say but it is still my belief..so you have the right to believe what ever u believe but
why are u getting in the way of me telling the jury my beliefs!!
The prosecutor know very well i get my 5 min to tell the jury what i believewhy is he
interrupting and acting in such a discourteous and dishonorable unmanly manner towards
you

Telling a jury to disregard

At the hearing require a trial by jury its your court and they cant have a hearing without your
knowledge changing it to a jury trial..put your foot down and require a trial by jury

Show me the sworn statement

Are you Robin Laurence Mitchell? You reply with which one?.
How can i be a defendant when no one has accused me?

244 | P a g e

If they ask if u r robin laurece mitchell the defendant in this case? You say what case their
isnt a case because their isnt anyone accusing me of anything? Ask if they have a sworn
statement of some harm wrong or loss?

Say if u want me to where the hat of defendant so long as u realize that the defendant is a
man and i have the right to face my accuser and then i will where that title so until you
bring the man forward that can swear under oath or affirmation that i do wrongthen only
and only then will i where that title because i would glad beg forgivenss and compensate
that man until he is made whole for whatever his loss is!! But until u bring that man or
woman forward i cant hold that title!! I got my cheque book right here and i am beggin you
to bring the man forward so i can compensate them

Do you have any man or woman who can testify that i owe a cent to the irs? I fyou do i will
pay that man so long as they can stand behind that claim? Ask the prosecutor if he can tell
you how much i owe on the stand?
So how can i pay the united states government if no man or woman can tell me what i owe??
How can i write this wrong?? What do you wish of me? Just to put me in a cage? Thats
ridiculous? Did i cause someone loss? then why do they want to do this to me?

The inside scoop is that the law firms are told very clearly that if you dont play ball that
they will have every case that they have eve been involved with be overturned!! Their hands
and lives are totally entrenched and compromised!!( there is a reason that jesus dont like
lawyers)

That is how settlement are done and also threaten to revers all the settlemnets which means
they will have to pay back their winnings so compromised are that class of lawyers

Tell the prosecutor do you prosecutor believe that there is a sworn testimony that i have
done something wrong? If so why not take the stand and say so?

The judge might say u havent given answer to the prosecutors questions then your
testimony can be stricken form the record reply with that u fell u have given a relevant
answer and until i see a sworn accusation under penalty of perjury before me how can i say
that question is pertinent to me? I dont know if i am dealing with Shirley temple or king
kong..

245 | P a g e

Dont let them place a order unless it is properly address to you..

I am Robin Laurence Mitchell the man not the defendant

When do i get to cross examine my accuser how and by what means do i get to meet my
accuser? Is there a man attached to this america..who is in control of this entity? And why
isnt he here accusing me of doing wrong to his creation? Where is his signature where is his
sworn complaint? Why isnt testifying on behalf of his entity?
If he send me that letter i promise you i will make him whole? Somebody give me an
itemized list? Somebody please hand me a bill? What else do you want from me? I want to
cooperate i want to answer questions!!
Put this in your own words so that it is congruent?

Bill Clinton show up when a hotel clerk accuse him of sexual harsement for flashing her and
the supreme court was clear that he had to show up as the number one servant of the
people!! Man is still higher than president..president might be the most powerful person not
powerful man the president is there to serve the people

Give the judge a note i am here but they wont let the man in

Dont use drivers id to enter the courtroom!!! Careful!! Enter as a man!!! So just put it in
writing for the sheriff or bailiff that is going to require it to let u in!!! the power of the written
word!! The notice should read..i a man robinlaurence mtichell will only be entering this
courthouse as a man and not as a person sign it thumbprint it.. dont be surprised that a
judge will have it place as exihibt A i n your case and read it before the court!! THATS IS
FUCKING CHECKMATE!!!SPECIALLY ON APPEAL!!

If you walk away from the court room of your own free will your claim will be seen as being
abandoned by you as well as your defence.

246 | P a g e

U need to force me out GENTLY out of the courtroom for the record so that the record
reflects you have not abandoned your claim..not that u want to fight but for the record to be
pushed out the court and u werent abandoning your claim..or sit there until they escort u
out!!

Indictment is a noun that means an accusation of wrongdoing. An indictment, or a legal

document charging you with a crime

taking orders is how you shield yourself form compliance issue that give them jurisdiction...
because NO is a sin to say..

Judge: i order you to show up as a defendant... ask for the order it in writting and sign it... so
u can bill him..innstead of saying No i will not.....the other possibility is to warn him of the
harm it will cause you to be a defendant... but ultimately whne ur pushed or forced into it
thats it the card to play..

Dont answer to Mr. Mitchell i am robin Mitchell

Dont answer to Robin l. Mitchell in orders i only answer to Robin Laurence Mitchell (Or the
all caps on orders )

At the beginning the judge announces the case and wil look at the prosecutor and ask if they
are ready then they will turn to you and ask you things like Mr. Mitchell are you ready to
proceed
Reply with i notice that you are directing your voice at me but i am not mr. Mitchell, i am
a man robin Mitchell and the only reason i am here, is to prosecute my claim against that
man over there acting in the capacity of prosecutor for commiting fraud by way of this
indictment that is on the record in this case and is also causing me harm as a man. And i
require you to move my case at the same time as this casecommon law land blah blah

247 | P a g e

The judge might say he is not hearing that today we are here for this are u ready to
proceed?
reply i notice you directing your voice at merepeat repeat
if the judge is getting pisssed at you if you want me to do something different put it in the
form of an order in writing sign it and i will carry your orders out( so as to be performing)
He may address u as the defense and repeat

The man acting as judge may order the sheriff to move you to be move to another
courtroom to have your trial so as to preserve your due process rights u reply with who is
going to tell what i can or can not do at my trial?
they may sneak you out of that court room so as to appoint you a full time counsil and let
some other lawyer run you into the ground..

now if the judge wants to proceed without my consent , of his own volition, then the man
acting as a judge bears the burden and full liabilityand his action or in actions to appoint
you this counsel and if this counsil causes any harm to i am man that bill williams known as
the man acting as a district court judge is going to be held fully liable for a claim for harm,
injury or financial loss due to his actions and inactions
there is a man attached to that person just because they can move the person the they
have to remmebr it is attached like a dog to your truck..u must consider the dog before u
drive the truck

if they ask is if the united sates is ready to proceedu need to object and ask who is the
united states? The prosecutor is the united states?wtf!!
if they ask if the government is ready to proceed ..u say which government?
Rip down their fraud wall.

Never go into court and bring your drivers licence make sure it goes in as an exhibit

Note ur drivers license isnt really yours as it belongs to its creator the government. How
you reply is this to a request for your license. I cant give u something i dont possess as it
is literally not mine i have no right to give it away this was state issued and put into my
custody for care and i am not at liberty to just discharge it to any man or woman on the
planet earth who simply ask for it,

248 | P a g e

So its not mine to give..but if i give u it what will u give me as a deposit in case u damage it
scratch it or break it in anyway..

Only claim what is due, order vs. claim

Dont claim punitive damages..the courts will asses them on the merits of the case.. they will
determine what is outrageous for them to get punitive damages..ie. somebody calling a man
a nigger
Better itemized why you are entitled to that money.. a dollar a sec for a child is getting off
light.

Keep your claim and your order separateie.. i order you to return my property attached
to this claim(case#)

We can go into court with our own made up name because we authored it and have full
control of it as it is our creation..and not the legal society and its not registered to them
either..

If a court has wasted a ton of your time hand the court a bill for $3000 or whatever u see
fit..and u may be surprised to see the judge rule for the prosecutor to pay the fine..

If u are ordered to appear in court send them a bill for performance..

249 | P a g e

If u r talking a lot in court a judge will order a psych avaluation(ur nutz for talking to a 2d
entity hence the reason to put it all in writting)
But if i he does have him put that lovely order in writing and sign it so you can carry i out..
(so u can give him a bill for following his orders)hence making the act all performance and
nothing is admissible as any other than a man carrying out orders!!!!

Bearing false witness against a amn use to mean a death sentence

A prosecutor brought a false claim that means u can take him for a lot for wasting your time
considering he knew in advance because of all the administrative process was done..so he is
liable for moving it forward demand compensation in your claim that you file for wasting
your time addressing a false complaint.

We are looking for a man or woman to beg their forgiveness and try and compensate to
make them whole how else can i provide a remedy or a cure?

To appear as a defendant against a society and its member i would be a fool and also would
get clobbered so at this time i cant afford to ove forward as a defendant at this time the
same reason i wouldnt take the tilte of heavy weight champiuon of the world because
eventually i would have to defend that title against someone who is prosecuting a win and i
would be harmedso i am trying to avoid harming myself at this timeif u force this title on
me it will cause me great harm..
A court is where a game is played..what kind of a game would it be if we make a ridiculous..

A claim means they are in the presence of a man..to them god!!

U need to be able to look the judge in the face and show him you know this whole thing is
fraud.. thats when they will behave.. but if u believe their threats it will be real. Just act
like u dont understand chinesse to you..

250 | P a g e

The badge and the robe doesnt make them immune from prosecuting

Judge wants appearance in PERSON, collection agency, compensation for appearing

When a judge is asking you to appear in person? U reply what person do you want me to
appear asa man . a prosecutor, as a judge , as a jury member, as a defendant what
person? Because i only know how to appear as a man!! I have never been a defendant but i
was born as a man so that will be easy for me to do.

The judge may post pone the trial saying they are looking for the person to appear u reply
with the person named robin Laurence Mitchell are in this court at this time but the only
problem is that i am a person that belong to the society of the Mitchell family and of man
but not a person that belongs to the legal society because i dont understand the language
of your society or its duties and obligations fines or penalties that it may impose on me

If a judges uses the language want to you do something asking him simply why you
dont require of me

You may forget to tell a judge something when you are there..if so just write him back a
letter asap(notarize it) explaining you were distracted by whatever personal issue clouded
your mind at the time and then proceed to clarify yourself..and be quick about it

Act like a mana judge wants to set a responsible man freeu will discover that they are
looking for a man

I can make either a general appearance as a man or a special appearance as something

elsewhat person would u like me to be?
If he says he wants u to appear as a defendant u say u cant move forward as a defendant at
this time because i am not competent in that role..but i do play a great prosecutor.

251 | P a g e

Preliminary hearing, court of no record, a corporation charging a man

Preliminary hearings happen before your court date and their can be more than just one
their could be several different preliminary hearings until both side agree and the judge is
okay with it..
You may need to be the magistrate to make a ruling on certain matters...
Can u make a ruling on whether I can show up as a man not a defendant?
And do I have the right to evoke common law court man on man..?they should agree with u
It is ur chance to state how your are going to fight. .is it a common law case is a complaint
and common law case at the same time..
U also want to establish your status as u are going to appear as.. a man....or a man and a
person ....or a man and defendant...
Also what is going to he discussed at the trial...
Now a prosecutor can't stand as a man
He might complaint and say things like I don't understand. .Lawyers better answer that way
or they will be held liable as a man...the have to play the idiot card as well to protect
themselves just like we have too....
A prosecutor can only understand the words of a defendant not of his creator man...just like
we can't claim to understand god or at least we shouldn't claim to know God's word.
If a lawyer calls ur paperwork nonsense and jobbers. .smile because he is protecting
himself....just ask them if their are a man? They can't admit that either... for the same
liability issue ...
Of course some may say they know the word of God. ..doesn't mean I have to believe him
or deny him his belief system..
U can deny his belief because his is a man..ur not by proxy deny god ...
All courts r courts of record...u want to be more specific.. what u want is the court to record
testimony..so ask to be sworn in under affirmation.
A magistrate might take.no testimony at ur trial.. that is when u will hear thst it is not a
court of record...it is a nisiprius court.?
They record but until they record testimony you are not pressing the record.. they are just
an administrative court u need a
Yes they can have transcripts but no man will aper on the transcript..
a defendant can't testify...

252 | P a g e

One must expect that there are maybe 1 in 10,000 person for every man so everything u do
as a man in court should be abosultely strange to the clerks and even judges

If you lose make an appeal but when ur at the appeal look for rule 41 (wherevere ur at) that
says something to the fx i a man an appealing the ruling and also voluntarily
surrendering my appeal so as to be able to get the entire casesooooo you can now file a
claim and drag them into your court. They wont unlock the paperwork unless you come in
as somebody they recognize..ie defendant or somebody filling a appealu may want to go
in a s a defendant here so as to be able to get your entire casethen require a leave of
court and file your claim and come back and suspend their case until your superior court has
come to its decision you don need to finish up in their case because you are going to
lose just start it as defendant and hold it in a leave of court request..

It doenst matter about the appeal process in the administrative courts. Even the SUPREME
COURTS DECESIONS can be overturned by the original judge .soooo thats is why u wont
care about taking the defendants position because the admin appeal court system wont
give u access to the file unless u do.. so take the position or you wont be recognized any
other way to make the judge liable..as he still has control ultimately even in the pseudo
appeal process as he can overturn any or judges opinions we must see appeals as a a
joke just like the original jurisdiction judge would so see it as a means to an end

http://judicial.alabama.gov/library/rules_aplt_procedure.cfm

Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 41. Issuance of certificate of judgment; stay of
certificate of judgment. (a) Date of issuance. The certificate of judgment of the court shall
issue 18 days after the entry of judgment unless the time is shortened or enlarged by order.
(1) In the courts of appeals, the timely filing of an application for rehearing will stay the
issuance of the certificate of judgment until disposition of the application unless otherwise
ordered by the court. If the application is denied, the certificate of judgment shall issue 18
days after entry of the order denying the application unless the time is shortened or
enlarged by order. (2) In the Supreme Court, the timely filing of an application for rehearing
will stay the issuance of the certificate of judgment until disposition of the application unless
otherwise ordered by the court. If the application is denied by the Supreme Court, the
certificate of judgment shall issue immediately unless in response to the first application the
court substantially modified the original decision of the court, in which case, the certificate
of judgment shall issue 18 days after entry of the order denying the application unless a
second application is filed or the time is shortened or enlarged by order. (b) Stay of
certificate of judgment pending petitions for certiorari to courts of appeals. The timely filing

253 | P a g e

of a petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court shall stay the issuance of the certificate of
judgment by the courts of appeals, which stay shall continue until the final disposition by the
Supreme Court. Upon the filing of a copy of an order of the Supreme Court denying the
petition for certiorari, the certificate of judgment of the courts of appeals shall issue
immediately. If the time for the issuance of the certificate of judgment shall have been
shortened pursuant to subdivision (a) hereof, the courts of appeals shall grant such relief,
upon motion, as may be appropriate. [Amended eff. 3-1-2007.] Committee Comments This
rule provides for the issuance of the certificate of judgment on the day following the
expiration of time for filing an application for rehearing under Rule 40. However, the rule
makes specific provision for relief to be granted to parties when the time for issuing the
certificate has been shortened or enlarged. This provision would have primary application
when such matters as injunctions, receiverships and child custodies are involved, and
envisions the use of bonds or other matters thought appropriate by the court to preserve the
rights of the parties while a rehearing by the court is held or while a party applies for
certiorari by the Supreme Court of a decision of a court of appeals. That provision is
contained in the last sentence of subdivision (b). Committee Comments to Amendment to
Rule 41 Effective March 1, 2007 (As Amended November 16, 2007) The amendment to
subdivision (a) of this rule takes into consideration that there are times when an application
for rehearing may be denied, but the original decision may have been reversed or
substantially modified by the ruling of the Supreme Court on the application. This
amendment provides that unless the original decision of the Supreme Court has been
reversed or substantially modified, the certificate of judgment shall issue immediately upon
the denial of the application for rehearing. This amendment is in conformance with the
language in Rule 40(a)(3), which provides that no second application for rehearing will be
considered unless the court reversed or substantially modified the original decision of the
court. The Committee did not amend the rule with regard to the courts of appeals because
the 18-day time period before issuance of a certificate of judgment allows time for a petition
for writ of certiorari, seeking review of a decision of the court of appeals, to be filed with the
Supreme Court. Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 32(b) and
Rule 41, effective March 1, 2007, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that
contains Alabama cases from 949 So. 2d. Note from the reporter of decisions: The order
amending Rule 32(b)(3) and Rule 37, Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, amending the
committee comments to the March 1, 2007, amendment to Rule 41, Alabama Rules of
Appellate Procedure, and adopting the Court Comment to Amendment to Rule 37 Effective
November 16, 2007, all effective November 16, 2007, is published in that volume of
Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from 972 So. 2

Notice your cases be sealed ..u want this case to remain sealed ; u dont want anyody to
open it; u dont want anybody to trespass your case; and only the parties are to have privy
to what is inside this case.; the defendant is going to know; the wrongdoer is going to know;
and i the man is going to know the prosecutor

You can get one of those wax seals and seal your claim so thats it is not opened until it goes
before a jury.

254 | P a g e

We dont care for any clerk or judges opinion as this case is taking on the direct boss of
these person. So there is a clear conflict of interest we are trying to avoid. So i only want my
fellow man to be view my case as only a man can understand this case because lawyers
dont understand what we are saying!!!!
We dont belong to their society so they cannot impose upon us!!!

Make sure u have your claims and summons properly served and when u go to court make
sure it is filed into the case as well

Use a process server or a private investigator to server your paperwork

Take one of their forms that they ask u to use and simply write see attached claim

Dealing with clerk..ask them if they are a public servant? They should say yesfollow it with
do i look like a public servant or do i look like the public to you?......soooooo you serve
the?......checkmate

U could use the old blackstones the courts are free access to the king and his subjects. Or
simply pay!! The advantage is you know have a contract binding them.make sure the
cheque is a not for a licence only for the use of the courtroom and its services.

They more removed your court is the likelier it will be to be not understand common law
claimsbe forewarned

Thumbprints on the documents!!

Dont be timid and soft spoken as they will run all over youloud is not firmloud is not
authoritative or assertive

255 | P a g e

 be the king the boss!!!

If time is on your side use the mail to file your claim as it can take up to a month to get your
case numberso sometimes it merits to physically go in and get it right away..

definitions as an exhibit

In proper law there is no synonyms. Attach definition of important words as an exhibit in our
docs. When we use a word it only mean one thing and one thing only, it doesnt kind of
mean something like this other thing.

idiot does not mean stupid or dumb.

See attached exhibit a- Idiot is a word derived from the Greek , idits ("person
lacking professional skill", "a private citizen", "individual"), from , idios ("private", "one's
own").-

U have to luv being called an idiot by a judge because that means youre going home

Their case vs. your case, vehicle seizure, compensation for jail time

Harm means blood is spilled on the ground

Injury means u knocked over my mail box
Accruable loss means paper money or a bank account..

256 | P a g e

In their case they may get a default judgemnet..u dont care what they put in their case
because we arent going to bring it to life..its not our baby/case because we didnt create
it..so dont fight their imaginary default judgement and its in their caseu need to make
your own case

U dont want the man to be nothing more than to bear witness not a judge..

The supreme court has ruled several times that your car is an extension of your home so
they need a warrant and probable cause to enter your home.. i would ask for a bond
attached?

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: "The right of the people to be secure
in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,
shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by
Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or
things to be seized."

If your in jail dont be suprized getting the bill for medical expenses and being housed in
prison!! Especially if you are in the wrong.. if not u did things right with your wish and
order and send them a bill for performance

Direct questions through the presiding judge, canon codes, dealing with court staff
Were asking the presider (presiding judge) a question to obtain a response from the
prosecutor (the other side), we require a response from the presider.

Subject matter/jurisdiction are questions for the presider (because without jurisdiction the
judge cant preside over the case, nature of the charges are questions for the prosecutor.

257 | P a g e

Make sure our questions are directed clearly. (all in writing).

If we get silence, then add Ill place on record that no one has objected to this point. In an
absence of an answer this statement is true.

(2.1-3 TO THE CLIENTk)

A lawyer who appears as an advocate should not submit the
lawyers own affidavit to or testify before a court or tribunal except as to purely formal or
uncontroverted matters, such as the attestation or custody of a document, unless it is
necessary in the interests of justice. If the lawyer is a necessary witness with respect to
other matters, the conduct of the case should be entrusted to other counsel.

2.1-3 TO THE CLIENT

then k0
Chapter 2 Standards of the Legal Profession annotated
Code of Professional Conduct for BC > Chapter 2 Standards of the Legal Profession
Code of Professional Conduct for BC > Chapter 2 Standards of the Legal Profession
2.1-1 TO THE STATE
(b)
When engaged as a Crown prosecutor, a lawyers primary duty is not to seek a
conviction but to see that justice is done; to that end the lawyer should make timely
disclosure to the defence of all facts and known witnesses whether tending to show guilt or
innocence, or that would affect the punishment of the accused.

Words are like guns, theyre not evil until theyre in government hand.

When we find that a lawyer isnt responding back, then write if youre not responding to
this, Ill just take it as youre accepting that youve done something wrong. Well just call it
quits. Ill forgive your trespasses, you forgive me of mine. I require a response to confirm
that youve received this in seven days. I require a response or your silence will be
construed as tacit agreement.

258 | P a g e

Do not answer for them, make them guilty by their self-confession.

Sometimes there will be judges from a foreign court try to come in and mess with our case.
Remind the judge that he shouldnt be trespassing our property and give him a chance to
redeem himself before we seek remedy.

Make sure our cases are sealed.

If were dealing with a clerk or a judge, trying to put our claim in etc. and were dealing with
the clerk. What we say to her is on that day you didnt do what I required you to do, so now
I hold you liable for your failure for carrying out your duties and obligations, a dereliction of
duty.

Or one you can confirm that youve received this letter, or two you can file my case/set a
date for my hearing/whatever I required you to do

Dont look for an apology or an admittance of wrong from these persons, instead look for
acquiescence.

Give them a way out, a benefit of the doubt. maybe you didnt see it that day..maybe you
were having a bad day.etc.ill give you one last chance to make amends

Bali suggests that after you have a two dimension rejection, go and have a face-to-face
negotiation. They wont take paper serious, but theyre still human. Its the say that to my
face factor. Being physically present is an advantage.

If were having trouble with clerk, require their tort claim form and then ask them their
name. Write that name on the claim. A clerk sometimes will tell us that our claim will go into
the courts paperwork and it could take up to a month to get a response. I require your

259 | P a g e

assurance that youre sending it to me within the designated month that youve just said
remind them that if I dont get my paperwork when you said Id get it, Ill come back
again.

Always think: if I dont get the answer I desire, what am I going to do about it?

In the united states its been a long standing tradition that the front door is unlocked!! Its a
public building holding the number one public servant!!!

Maybe your courthouse actually has a sign outside saying how to file a claim after hours too

Act like its one of your buildings and they will treat u accordingly!!

If u ask for permission they will take it!!!

260 | P a g e

261 | P a g e

I only have a duty and obligation to my fellow man and godmy plate is too full for this
court to intercourse with me..

Whne they call out our name in court you say i the man known as robin is before this court
and i the person robin Laurence Mitchell is before this court. [be the man and the
person]..you say, your person the prosecutor and your person the judge are holding a trial
against my person.. the problem is i have been challenging juridcition the wholetime!! By
your person intercoursing with my person it is causing me harm and i wish for you to cease
and desist. I dont enjoy playing this game. I dont have any comprehension of your crown
rules nor can you show me any law the can force me to comprehend your rules as i am not a
member of your legal society and i wish to be let alone.but you continue to prosecute and
persecute me and i see no claim before this court before we go for sentencing.

And if they have the letter where they try and extort you with those plea deals thats where
you will file your claim of trespass and extortion

Then place an order for you to want this case #--------- to be discharged in its entirety

Then place second and sepearte order you order for compensation because of this extortion
i have hard harm befall on me. These charges have burden me and i now want them
reversed as what i am a charged with i can now ask for the same in kind for the amount of
$25000 ( or what ever the actual finanacially fair market value of those charges to be given
to her in kind)

incur
inkr/

verb

262 | P a g e

past tense: incurred; past participle: incurred

become subject to (something unwelcome or unpleasant) as a result of one's own behavior
or actions.
"I will pay any expenses incurred"
synonyms: bring upon oneself, expose oneself to, lay oneself open to; More

Dont be screaming to judges..they arent real and u better be wary of bringing them to life!!
Put it in writing!!

Leave their case sealed dont bring them into existence

Dont intercourse with the second dimension!!! Put it in writing!!

If your reading this off a script how is a judge gonna believe its really you!!! Who has this
belief? U need to have it or else the judge is not going to rule in ur favor..

Keep your claim short!! So you can remember it!! And keep it close to your heart no it inside
out!!! You can add an exhibit a with the complaint !!! Dont give away how you will show
your evidence!!

Omg...every solicitor will tell you!!! That they owe their allegiance to the court not to you!!
But guess wat that means for you if you bring in your court? Their allegence must be to
me!!! Hence why they bow out so often when you open your claim from your case.. and why
they fight so hard not to be under you!!

If you are looking for how the lawyers and court clerks are supposed to act you need to look
into their canon codes in your district it is the rules to their religion.

Canon

263 | P a g e

CANON, noun
1. In ecclesiastical affairs, a law, or rule of doctrine or discipline, enacted by a council and
confirmed by the sovereign; a decision of matters in religion, or a regulation of policy or
discipline, by a general or provincial council.
2. A law or rule in general.
3. The genuine books of the Holy Scriptures, called the sacred cannon, or general rule of
moral and religious duty, given by inspiration.
4. A dignitary of the church; a person who possesses a prebend or revenue allotted for the
performance of divine service in a cathedral or collegiate church.
A cardinal canon is one attached to a church, incardinatus, as a priest to a parish.
Domicellary canons, are young canons, not in orders, having no right in any particular
chapters.
Expectative canons, having no revenue or prebend, but having the title and dignities of
canons, a voice in the chapter and a place in the choir, till a prebend should fall.
Foreign canons, such as did not officiate in their canonries; opposed to mansionary or
residentiary canons.
Lay, secular or honorary canons, laymen admitted out of honor or respect, into some
chapter of canons.
Regular canons, who live in monasteries or in community, and who, to the practice of their
rules, have added the profession of vows.
Tertiary canons, who have only the third part of the revenue of the canonicate.
5. In monasteries, a book containing the rules of the order.
6. A catalogue of saints acknowledged and canonized in the Romish Church.
7. The secret words of the mass from the preface to the Pater, in the middle of which the
priest consecrates the host. The people are to rehearse this part of the service, on their
knees, and in a voice lower than can be heard.
8. In ancient music, a rule or method for determining the intervals of notes, invented by
Ptolemy.
9. In modern music, a kind of perpetual fugue, in which the different parts, beginning one
after another, repeat incessantly the same air.
10. In geometry and algebra, a general rule for the solution of cases of a like nature with the
present inquiry. Every last step of an equation is a canon
11. In pharmacy, a rule for compounding medicines.
12. In surgery, an instrument used in sewing up wounds.

264 | P a g e

CANON-law, is a collection of ecclesiastical laws, serving as the rule of church government.

This is how to call them out

Not only is it my belief that you are my fellow man and this is a public building and youre a
public servant and u must abide by what i wish. Not only do i believe but when u have a
duty and obligation to the court acoording to your cannon code. Most case an attorneys
court is in session but now its my court and u owe me a duty and obligationand its a claim
i am putting before this court house and i know u dont want to interfere with my access to
the court house?

Because a lawyer has an allegiance to the court when ur is present they must give u their
allegiance as man created them to help man

So simply ask does not your rigid canon code read something to the effect that the first
duty and obligation of a solicitor or a clerk is to the court?

Ask a judge when u are starting your trial is the court open? They might be a smart ass and
tell you the court hours are open 8 to 5 pm ..you reply with your question..i didnt ask u what
time the courthouse is open i was asking when is court open? He should say when ever u
wish??? That should settle down everyone in the court roomfollow it withwhen can i
make that wish? (remember the attorunery generals office may not know what u are doing
but a good judge will)
What is the term of this court from the time i file or the time you are assigned the case and
seated? (you can find the answer specific to your court but reading the canons they
subscribe to..) they should answer the later the time they were assigned and seated..
Advantage you if you read the canon codes of the court ur prosecuting in
Who filed the claim and notices in to the court? The judge response is you did?
So then you ask whose court is this? They should tell u it your court..
Soooooo if i wish to convene my court at 1 am on christmas day? What happens next? You
will quickly note the judge asking you to be reasonable about your time requirements
The judge response should be the sheriff department would call me up and i would make my
way down here

265 | P a g e

Because we act and move at my leisure

How the IRS becomes the defendant, and the power of letters

If u belive we are in error u have every right to petition your government for redressu have
every right to have your belief heard lol PETITION !!!??? mistake u should have filed a
claim!!! They tell u to file it at your local district tax court and bang!!! Youre in an
administrative court!!

I would send them back the same invitation back to the irs that looks just like theirs, saying
you entertain them at any local court here and where they can file their claim that i owe a
debt

Fall up with the irs a letter asking them to discharge this case because it is causing you harm
and loss as a man and return your whatever property u are still holding for meand your
check should be in the mail!!! But warning it may take a few letters but in Canada they have
strict laws that they only have six month to prosecute you..

Walk into court and claim youre a total idiot and u dont understand. Who say i did
something wrong.. No ..so what your are saying is i did something right? no are u saying
i did something illegal? Because u do know u are talking to a man? And i dont care what the
legal society thinks? There is no law that requires me to understand any legalese!!! You do
realize that it only applies to the legal society right? Did i do something unlawful or break
some natural laws to let a man alone? (quiet threat as they are doing this to you). How are u
join to me how are u trying to intercourse with me..how are u trying to get joinder here? How
do you have any control over me other than the fact that u have a gun? Good day sir and i
dont need an interpret and i still remain completely incompetent and there is no law that
exist compelling me towe are not pro se and no i dont want that title and u cant force it
on me as i am to burden with to many other title to take this on at this time or capacity and
if i did it would harm me.

266 | P a g e

Check mate!!

Dealing with government agents, and income tax

What law do you have me under?
Theyll say 1972 bill of blah blah blah
I guarantee that youre not going to find my name in signature on that contract.
So it neither binds I the man or my person.
The law doesnt have Karl the man, it needs to be expressed, not implied, to be good law.

i claim a wrong of trespass see exhibit a

8 sweet words u can stick to.. i will talk about the exhibit all day but i wont change or talk
about my claim!!

If a judge orders u to prison for 15 years u say who is sigin that order because i want just
compensation for performance and that is $1 miilion and i want it in advance because i dont
know who you are and u dont have enough credit with me to do anything other tha put the
money upfront before i perform..because i know this court doesnt have any jurisdiction over
me!!!
SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS. (See also the title Actions, i Encyc. of Pl.
AND Pr. 112.) The term " special proceeding " is used in the codes of practice of many of the states in contradistinction to "action;" it maybe said
generally that any proceeding in a court which was not, under the commonlaw and equity practice, either an action at law or a suit in chancery is a

267 | P a g e

special proceeding.* " The phrase ' special proceedings,' within its proper
definition, is a generic term for all civil remedies in courts of justice which are
not ordinary actions." '

Always make a special appearance in writing before you get there!!!! As appearing in black
laws is giving jurisdiction and u are going to COME to court(this has implication) !! when u
arrive u challenge jurisdictions!!

When they ae asking u for a plea of not guilty or guilty or no contestits like like offering u 3
false choices..if u choose any u will fail!! Dont understand anything the judge says is your
first position and second setlle all verifyable true claims is all u are here to do!! U want to act
like u are in a common law court as this is how to properly behave there!! This lets the judge
know he is in the worng jurisdiction with you and he will now try to pull you into his
jurisdiction and its game on!! The reason u should have a confused look about what is going
on is to let them understand U DONT RECOGNIZE OR STAND UNDER THEIR COURTS!

Karl talks about his Alabama case.

Title 28
Part VProcedure[edit]
This part establishes criminal procedure and civil procedure for the federal courts. The
Supreme Court, pursuant to the Rules Enabling Act and upon recommendations from the
Judicial Conference of the United States, promulgates the more detailed Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure and Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
Chapter 111: General Provisions
Chapter 113: Process
Chapter 114: Class Actions
Chapter 115: Evidence; Documentary
Chapter 117: Evidence; Depositions
Chapter 119: Evidence; Witnesses
Chapter 121: Juries; Trial by Jury

268 | P a g e

A jury trial or trial by jury is a legal proceeding in which a jury either makes a decision or
makes findings of fact, which then direct the actions of a judge. It is distinguished from a
bench trial, in which a judge or panel of judges make all decisions.

If a clerk or someone at the court house interferes with our case, they are harming I the man
and the person were suing.
Use a default judgement to flush out the man if they dont appear in court, cus we can take
the default judgement and go collect on them, and the only way they can counter that is by
showing up in court to argue.
Weve put the claim into the record, weve sent notices to the other party, now we order a
summons through a clerk of the court via process server to the other party, the summons
states that the other party has 21 days to respond. Go to the clerk, say the summons has
been sent out, if the other party does not respond within 21 days I want you to sign the
paper work and time stamp it saying press upon the record that the other side failed to
appear and failed to answer so I require a default judgement.
When they try to arraign us ask what is the nature of your person whom you seek and do
you have a claim. May I settle the claim at this point, is there an outstanding debt thats
due?
if they say youre in violation of this code then we say who wrote the code? Code is some
bodys interpretation of the public law, I cant hold the company that interpreted the law
liable. Whats the public LAW? Wheres the true copy of the public law?
Wheres your oath of office? If you dont have one then you work for a private corporation
all federal courts are article 3 courts under the constitution. The characteristic of a federal
court is a court of record.
Nevada:
Universal Citation: NV Rev Stat 1.030 (2013)
The common law of England, so far as it is not repugnant to or in conflict with the
Constitution and laws of the United States, or the Constitution and laws of this State, shall
be the rule of decision in all the courts of this State.
[1911 CPA 532; RL 5474; NCL 9021]
Provincial Courts in this sense are courts of limited statutory jurisdiction, sometimes
referred to as "inferior courts." As courts of limited jurisdiction, their decisions are potentially
subject to judicial review by the superior courts via the prerogative writs, but in most cases
there are now well-established statutory rights of appeal instead.
Superior Courts[edit]
The second is the term "superior courts." This term also has two different meanings, one
general and one specific.
The general meaning is that a superior court is a court of inherent jurisdiction. Historically,
they are the descendants of the royal superior courts in England. The decisions of a superior

269 | P a g e

court are not subject to review, unless a statute specifically provides for review or appeal.
The term is not limited to trial courts. The Federal Court of Appeal and the provincial and
territorial Courts of Appeal are all superior courts.
The more limited sense is that "Superior Court" can be used to refer to the superior trial
court of original jurisdiction in the Province. This terminology is used in the court systems of
Ontario and Quebec.
The difference between the two terms is also indicated by capitalisation. The term "superior
court" is used to mean the general sense of the term, while "Superior Court" is used to refer
to specific courts in provinces which use that term to designate their superior trial courts.
Is superior court the common law court?

A prerogative writ is a writ (official order) directing the behavior of another arm of
government, such as an agency, official, or other court. It was originally available only to the
Crown under English law, and reflected the discretionary prerogative and extraordinary
power of the monarch.
Is this used from our superior court in common law?

Superior-level courts of the provinces and territories[edit]

These courts (as listed below by province and territory in alphabetical order) exist at the
provincial and territorial levels. The superior courts are the courts of first instance for divorce
petitions, civil lawsuits involving claims greater than small claims, and criminal prosecutions
for indictable offences (i.e., felonies in American legal terminology). They also perform a
reviewing function for judgements from the local inferior courts and administrative decisions
by provincial or territorial government entities such as labour boards, human rights tribunals
and licensing authorities.

Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (ABQB)

Supreme Court of British Columbia (BCSC)

Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (MBQB)

Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (NBQB)

270 | P a g e

Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Trial Division) (NLTD)

Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories (NTSC)[29]

Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (NSSC)

Nunavut Court of Justice (NUCJ)[30]

Court of Ontario Ontario Superior Court of Justice (ONSC)

Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island (PESC)

Qubec Superior Court (QCCS)

Court of Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan (SKQB)

Supreme Court of Yukon (YKSC)[31]

Furthermore, some of these superior courts (like the one in Ontario) have specialized
branches that deal only with certain matters such as family law or small claims. To
complicate things further, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has a branch called the
Divisional Court that hears only appeals and judicial reviews of administrative tribunals and
whose decisions have greater binding authority than those from the "regular" branch of the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Although a court, like the Supreme Court of British
Columbia, may have the word "supreme" in its name, it is not necessarily the highest court
in its respective province or territory.
Most provinces have special courts dealing with small claims (lawsuits for less than a certain
amount of money). These are typically divisions of the superior courts in each province.
Parties often represent themselves, without lawyers, in these courts

Supreme Court of British Columbia

The Supreme Court of British Columbia (BCSC) is the superior trial court for
the province of British Columbia. The BCSC hears civil and criminal law cases as well as
appeals from the Provincial Court of British Columbia. Including supernumerary judges, there
are presently 108 judges. There are also 13 Supreme Court masters who hear and dispose of
a wide variety of applications in chambers.[1]

271 | P a g e

Jurisdiction[edit]
The BCSC is a court of record, having original jurisdiction in all cases, civil and criminal,
arising in British Columbia. The BCSC has inherent jurisdiction under the Constitution of
Canada in addition to any jurisdiction granted to it by federal or provincial statute.
The BCSC has jurisdiction in any civil dispute, including those matters where the dollar
amount involved is within the jurisdiction of the Small Claims division of the Provincial Court.
Under the Criminal Code of Canada, the BCSC is included as a "superior court of criminal
jurisdiction", meaning that it has exclusive jurisdiction for the trial of serious crimes within
British Columbia.
The BCSC also hears appeals from the Provincial Court and some administrative tribunals.
Appeals to its own judgments are heard by the Court of Appeal of British Columbia.
The BCSC is also responsible for call ceremonies for admitting lawyers and notaries
public where the respective oath of office is administered by a justice. [2][3]
Justices and masters[edit]
All justices of the BCSC (including the position of Chief Justice and Associate Chief Justice)
are appointed by the federal cabinet, on recommendation of the Minister of Justice. All BCSC
justices have full jurisdiction over any matter before the BCSC.
It is court protocol to refer to BCSC judges as "justices", and in court to address to justices as
My Lord or My Lady," unlike in the Provincial Court (and the now-abolished County Court)
where the term judge is used and the mode of address is (and was) "Your Honour."
Masters are appointed by the provincial cabinet, on recommendation of the Attorney
General in consultation with the Chief Justice. As provincial appointees, masters do not have
inherent jurisdiction. Their jurisdiction is limited to those matters granted to them
by statute and the Rules of Court. Masters preside in chambers, where they usually
hear interlocutory applications and other pre-trial matters. Masters cannot hear civil trials
and do not preside in criminal matters. In court, Masters were formerly addressed as
"Master," but in a practice direction issued on September 6, 1991, then Chief Justice Esson
advised the most appropriate form of address would be "Your Honour". Masters also sit and
hear matters as registrars, hearing such matters as assessments of solicitors fees and
accounts.
Judicial districts[edit]
The BCSC sits in eight judicial districts called "counties". This is the only usage of "county" in
British Columbia, which is a reference only to such court districts and has no similarity to the
meaning in other provinces or in the United States or the United Kingdom. Prior to 1990,
there existed in British Columbia a County Court, an intermediate court between the
Provincial Court and the BCSC. In 1990, the County Court of B.C. merged with the BCSC and
its judges became justices of the BCSC. The judicial districts of the Supreme Court have the
same boundaries of the counties of the former County Court.

272 | P a g e

The judicial districts are: Cariboo; Kootenay; Nanaimo; Prince Rupert; Vancouver; Victoria;
Westminster; and Yale. The Counties of Vancouver and Westminster are collectively one
judicial district under the name of the "Vancouver Westminster Judicial District". [4] Within
each county, or judicial district, justices are resident in the following
locations: Chilliwack; Cranbrook; Kamloops; Kelowna; Nanaimo; Nelson; New
Westminster; Prince George; Prince Rupert; Victoria; and Vancouver. The BCSC also holds
sittings in the following court locations for which there is not a resident justice: Campbell
River; Courtenay; Dawson Creek; Duncan; Fort Nelson; Fort St. John; Golden; Penticton; Port
Alberni; Powell River; Quesnel; Revelstoke, Rossland; Salmon
Arm; Smithers; Terrace; Vernon; and Williams Lake.

Ontario Superior Court of Justice

The Superior Court of Justice is the superior court of general jurisdiction for
the Province of Ontario, Canada. It is the successor to the former Ontario Court of Justice
(General Division), and was created April 19, 1999. Its predecessor, the Ontario Court
(General Division) was the result of the 1990 merger of the previous High Court of Justice
(formerly part of the Supreme Court of Ontario), District Court and Surrogate Court. The
Superior Court of Justice continues as a superior court of record with general and inherent
jurisdiction in all civil and criminal matters. Its seat is at historic Osgoode Hall in Toronto, and
the court has 8 regions province-wide.
The Superior Court of Justice is a division of the Court of Ontario.[2] (The other division of the
Court of Ontario is the Ontario Court of Justice.)
All civil matters are disposed of in the Superior Court, with the exception of family
law matters that are within the jurisdiction of the Ontario Court of Justice. The Ontario Court
of Justice is a lower court that assumed the functions of the former Ontario Court (Provincial
Division) in 1999. The Superior Court of Justice has sole jurisdiction in divorce cases and in
family law matters which contain claims for the division of matrimonial property. It also
hears support and custody matters, generally when these have been included in a claim for
divorce or where these claims have been joined to claim seeking a division of marital
property.
The Superior Court of Justice is also the superior trial court with general jurisdiction in
criminal matters and hears all criminal cases that are tried before a judge and a jury. Judges
of the Court also hear appeals from the decisions of judges of Ontario Court of Justice
in summary conviction matters.

273 | P a g e

Branches of the Superior Court of Justice[edit]

The Superior Court of Justice has three branches:
The Divisional Court[edit]
The Divisional Court hears appeals from some judgments and orders of judges of the
Superior Court of Justice and reviews or hears appeals from decisions of administrative
tribunals. It hears all appeals from a final order of the Superior Court where the award does
not exceed $50,000.00. The Divisional Court also hears appeals from Small Claims Court
judgments exceeding $2,500.00 (there is no statutory right of appeal from a Small Claims
Court judgment of less than $2,500.00). The Divisional Court consists of the Chief Justice of
the Superior Court of Justice, who is president of the court, and such other judges of the
Superior Court as the Chief Justice designates from time to time. Hearings take place before
a panel of three judges except in the case of appeals from the Small Claims Court which take
place before a single judge. The Divisional Court is a descendant of the court of the same
name in England, which is part of the Queen's Bench division of the EnglishHigh Court of
Justice, and hears certain appeals.
The Small Claims Court[edit]
The Small Claims Court has jurisdiction in civil matters where the amount in issue does not
exceed $25,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs. The monetary jurisdiction of this court is
fixed by regulation, rising to the current limit from $10,000 on January 1, 2010. The majority
of Small Claims Court matters are heard by deputy judges, lawyers who have been
appointed for a period of three years by the Regional Senior Justice to hear such cases. As
result of court reform, no new full-time judges have been appointed by the provincial
government to preside in Small Claims Court. Proceedings in the Small Claims Court are
governed by a codified set of rules contained in O. Reg. 258/98 (as amended), the Rules of
the Small Claims Court, instead of the complex Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure.
The Family Court[edit]
In those areas of Ontario where the Family Court branch of the Superior Court of Justice does
not exist, jurisdiction over family law disputes is divided between the Superior Court of
Justice and the Ontario Court of Justice. Cases which have divorce or property claims are
brought exclusively in the Superior Court, and child protection and adoption cases must be
commenced solely in the Ontario Court of Justice. Each of these two courts has jurisdiction
over child and spousal support, as well as custody and access claims.

274 | P a g e

In those places where the Family Court branch of the Superior Court of Justice has been
established, there is no divided jurisdiction in family law matters. The Family Court succeeds
what was known as the Unified Family Court, which began as a pilot project in Hamilton, in
1977. It has complete jurisdiction over all family law matters in its area, including those
matters currently within the jurisdiction of judges of the Provincial Division and the General
Division. The Family Court is presided over by a Senior Judge of the Superior Court for the
Family Court. The Family Court consists of the Chief Justice of the Superior Court, the
Associate Chief Justice (Family Court) the Senior Judge of the Family Court, and any other
Superior Court Judge as assigned by the Chief Justice or designate.
Judicial Officers of the Court[edit]
The Superior Court consists of the Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice, currently the
Honourable Heather Forster Smith; the Associate Chief Justice of the Superior Court of
Justice, currently the Honourable Frank N. Marrocco; 8 Regional Senior Judges; a Senior Judge
of the Family Court, currently the Honourable R. John Harper; and such number of judges as
is fixed by provincial regulation. The current complement of judges is fixed at 223 judges
excluding the Chief Justice, the Associate, the Regional Senior Judges and the Senior Judge of
the Family Court. Of this number, 29 are appointed as members of the Family Court. In
addition there are a number of supernumerary judges appointed as required from time to
time.[3]
Superior Court Judges are federally appointed and paid by the federal government. There
are also provincially appointed judicial officers who exercise certain functions in the superior
court. These include masters, assessment officers and registrars.
Masters have jurisdiction conferred by the rules of the court in civil and family proceedings
in the Superior Court. In civil matters, masters are authorized to hear most pre-trial
procedural questions and, as well, deal with specialized matters such as construction liens.
Masters carry out case management functions and conduct pre-trials and settlement
conferences. The purpose of masters is to undertake work that would otherwise fall to
judges and in areas of the province where masters are not assigned, these functions are
carried out by the judges of the court. Currently there are masters in Toronto, Windsor and
Ottawa.
Orders made by masters have the same force and effect as judges' orders although they
may be appealed to a judge. Masters are appointed and paid by the provincial government.
Masters have existed in the courts of Ontario since 1837.

275 | P a g e

Registrars in Bankruptcy: The Superior Court of Justice also has 5 Judicial Officers designated
by the Chief Justice under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act to sit as part of the Bankruptcy
Court. Currently there is the Registrar and two Deputy Registrars at Toronto as well as a
Deputy Registrar in each of Ottawa and London.
Assessment Officers: Assessment Officers (formerly known as taxing officers) review lawyers
bills under the Solicitors Act and adjudicate costs awarded to parties by judges or masters if
the court does not fix the costs at the hearing of the motion or trial
.
Black's Law 4th edition, 1891
RECORD, n. A written account of some act,
transaction, or instrument, drawn up, under authority
of law, by a proper officer, and designed
to remain as a memorial or permanent evidence
of the matters to which it relates. People ex rel.
Simons v. Dowling, 146 N.Y.S. 919, 920, 84 Misc.
201. A memorandum public or private, of what
has been done, ordinarily applied to public records
only, in which sense it is a written memorial
made by a public officer. Nogueira v. State, 123
Tex.Cr.R. 449, 59 S.W.2d 831.
The act or fact of recording or being recorded, reduction
to writing as evidence, also, the writing so made, a register,
a family record, official contemporaneous writing, an
authentic official copy of document entered in book or
deposited in keeping of officer designated by law, an official
contemporaneous memorandum stating the proceedings of
a court or official copy of legal papers used in a case.
Shimmel v. People, 108 Colo. 592, 121 P.2d 491, 493.
There are three kinds of records, viz.: (1) judicial,
as an attainder; (2) ministerial, on oath,
being an office or inquisition found; (3) by way
of conveyance, as a deed enrolled. Wharton.
A written memorial of all the acts and proceedings
in an action or suit, in a court of record.
The official and authentic history of the cause,
consisting in entries of each successive step in
the proceedings, chronicling the various acts of
the parties and of the court, couched in the formal
language established by usage, terminating with
the judgment rendered in the cause, and intended
to remain as a perpetual and unimpeachable
memorial of the proceedings and judgment. State

276 | P a g e

v. Brewer, 19 Ala.App. 291, 97 So. 160, 161.

At common law, a roll of parchment upon which the proceedings
and transactions of a court are entered or drawn
up by its officers, and which is then deposited in its treasury
in perpetuam rei memoriam. 3 Steph.Comm. 583; 3
Bl.Comm. 24. A court of record is that where the acts and
judicial proceedings are enrolled in parchment for a perpetual
memorial and testimony, which rolls are called the
"records of the court," and are of such high and supereminent
authority that their truth is not to be called in
question. Hahn v. Kelly, 34 Cal. 422, 94 Am.Dec. 742.
O'Connell v. Hotchkiss, 44 Conn. 53; Murrah v. State,
51 Miss. 656; State v. Anders, 64 Kan. 742, 68 P. 668;
Wilkinson v. Railway Co., C.C., 23 F. 562; In re Christern,
43 N.Y.Super.Ct. 531.
Courts of record. Those whose judicial acts and
proceedings are enrolled in parchment, for a perpetual
memorial and testimony, which rolls are
called the "records of the court," and are of such
high and supereminent authority that their truth
is not to be called in question. Every court of
record has authority to fine and imprison for contempt
of its authority. 3 Broom & H. Comm. 21,
30. Page v. Turcott, 179 Tenn. 491, 167 S.W.2d
350, 354.
ATTACHMENT. The act or process of taking,
apprehending, or seizing persons or property, by
virtue of a writ, summons, or other judicial order,
and bringing the same into the custody of the
law; used either for the purpose of bringing a
person before the court, of acquiring jurisdiction
over the property seized, to compel an appearance,
to furnish security for debt or costs, or to arrest
a fund in the hands of a third person who may become
liable to pay it over. Also the writ or other
process for the accomplishment of the purposes
above enumerated, this being the more common
use of the word. A remedy ancillary to an action
by which plaintiff is enabled to acquire a lien
upon property or effects of defendant for satisfaction
of judgment which plaintiff may obtain.
First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Vermillion v.
Kirby, 62 S.D. 489, 253 N.W. 616; Lipscomb v.
Rankin, Tex.Civ.App., 139 S.W.2d 367, 369. Though
sometimes called an ancillary or auxiliary proceeding,
it is in all essential respects, a suit.
Farmers State Bank of Lexington v. Lemmer, 130
Neb. 211, 264 N.W. 415, 416.

277 | P a g e

The purpose is to take defendant's property into legal

custody, so that it may be applied on defendant's debt to
plaintiff when established. John Deere Plow Co. of St.
Louis v. L. D. Jennings, Inc., 203 S.C. 426, 27 S.E.2d 571,
572; Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Edwards, 281 Ky. 693, 137
23. W.2d 344, 348.
At common law, "attachment" was procedure whereby
sheriff was, commanded to attach a defendant who, after
being personally served, disobeyed original writ of summons,
by keeping certain of his goods which he would forfeit
if he did not appear, or by making him find securities
who would be amerced if he continued his nonappearance,
and, if after such attachment he still neglected to appear,
he would not only forfeit this security, but was compellable
by a writ of distringas infinite. Grimmett v. Barnwell,
184 Ga. 461, 192 S.E. 191, 194, 116 A.L.R. 257.
Execution and attachment distinguished. See
Execution.
Persons
A writ issued by a court of record, commanding
the sheriff to bring before it a person who has
been guilty of contempt of court, either in neglect
or abuse of its process or of subordinate powers.
3 Bl.Comm. 280; 4 Bl.Comm. 283; Commonwealth
v. Shecter, 250 Pa. 282, 95 A. 468, 470.
Property
A species of mesne process, by which a writ is
issued at the institution or during the progress
of an action, commanding the sheriff to seize the
property, rights, credits, or effects of the defendant
to be held as security for the satisfaction of
such judgment as the plaintiff may recover. It is
principally used against absconding, concealed, or
fraudulent debtors. U. S. Capsule Co. v. Isaacs,
23 Ind.App. 533, 55 N.E. 832.
To Give Jurisdiction
Where the defendant is a non-resident, or beyond
the territorial jurisdiction of the court, his
goods or land within the territory may be seized
upon process of attachment; whereby he will be
compelled to enter an appearance, or the court
acquires jurisdiction so far as to dispose of the
property attached. This is sometimes called "foreign
attachment." Megee v. Beirne, 39 Pa. 50;
Bray v. McClury, 55 Mo. 128. In such a case, the
proceeding becomes in substance one in rem
against the attached property. St. John v. Parsons,
54 Ohio App. 420, 7 N.E.2d 1013, 1014.
Domestic and Foreign
In some jurisdictions it is common to give the
name "domestic attachment" to one issuing
against a resident debtor, (upon the special

278 | P a g e

ground of fraud, intention to abscond, etc.,) and

to designate an attachment against a non-resident,
or his property, as "foreign." Longwell v. Hartwell,
30 A. 495, 164 Pa. 533; David E. Kennedy,
Inc. v. Schleindl, 290 Pa. 38, 137 A. 815, 816, 53
A.L.R. 1020.
But the term "foreign attachment" more properly
belongs to the process otherwise familiarly known as
"garnishment." It was a peculiar and ancient remedy
open to creditors within the jurisdiction of the city of
London, by which they were enabled to satisfy their own
debts by attaching or seizing the money or goods of the
debtor in the hands of a third person within the jurisdiction
of the city. Welsh v. Blackwell, 14 N.J.Law, 346.
This power and process survive in modern law, in all commonlaw jurisdictions, and are variously denominated.
"garnishment," "trustee process," or "factorizing." Raiguel
v. McConnell, 25 Pa. 362, 363. A "foreign attachment"
is a mesne process issued to compel a foreign debtor to
appear to the suit of his creditor, while "attachment
execution" is a final process issued for the purpose of
enforcing a judgment already obtained. Williams v. Ricca,
324 Pa. 33, 187 A. 722, 723.
ATTACHMENT EXECUTION. A name given in
some states to a process of garnishment for the
satisfaction of a judgment. As to the judgment
debtor it is an execution; but as to the garnishee
it is an original processa summons commanding
him to appear and show cause, if any he has, why
the judgment should not be levied on the goods
and effects of the defendant in his hands. Sniderman
v. Nerone, 7 A.2d 496, 499, 136 Pa.Super. 381.
ATTACHMENT OF PRIVILEGE. In English law.
A process by which a man, by virtue of his privilege,
calls another to litigate in that court to
which he himself belongs, and who has the privilege
to answer there. A writ issued to apprehend
a person in a privileged place. Termes de la Ley.

Using codes in your claim

279 | P a g e

DONT

Getting everything on the record, and how to deal with a Judge

Anybody who wants to speak at the court ask a simple question have they been sworn in.
watch nobody will swear in their should be a court recorder.. i would get the transcript
after , granted this is if you lose, and file an appeal.. take the original transcript and make a
copy .on the copy redact everything the party that werent sworn in said and then at the
appealet you say nobody came in and swore under oath that anything they were saying and
doing was true..they refused to be held liable for what they just said.. thye only brought
hearsay conjecture and speculation before a tribunal and before the court.

I believe that One must be sworn in to press the recordand so does the new hampshire
barcode association believes its true

Even in family court u should wish to evoke common law..even if the family judge refused to
recognize yor claim in court.. if the judge says he doesnt want to hear itthats fine..u cant
make anybody to anything u cant make your husband or wife do anything.. so if they
dont want to hear it just give them an notice of error

If the judge knows that u are in a common law and that u are evoking your common law
case and have him hear your case which is his duty and he still doesnt want to hear itu
hold them liable and sue the man or woman dont mention they are a judge in your local
county court they are a public servant whose was derelict in ther duty as a public servant
as they subscribed and agreed to in their contract..thye failed to provide the service the
were suposed to and i want just compensation
Dont worry about going to the same court house that is family court because that
venue where differnet hats and can handle your claim.

280 | P a g e

Judge want to recuse themselves from cases becaseu of excuse like that they know
the person involved.. u respond with.. the person may be the best person you ever met but
this doesnt change the fact that they were derelict in their duty an di will hold her liable for
failing to carring out their duty..because of this failure of service is causing me loss and i am
going to claim compensation..so they never do that again..
Thye may say that they would unfair because they know the person and u say dont
worry i am sure u will do your job fair and properly and not be derelict in your duty and
besides we are going to let the jury decide..front he law and the fact.. ur there just to
witness..ur not going to control the flow of the court..its my case i am going to control it..
Can u give me the point on law why you won't? Can u give me your conclusion of law and
statements of facts as to why u won't hear my claim?
I the history of England the crown has never beaten a man in a common law case..
Judge ask u wat ur doing there after not answering the name game...u say u are a man and
your here to help ur fellow man..
Judge may say No your not
Reply what's the point of law?and no I a am not a man and wat makes u believe that I am
not going g to help my fellow man
He might say your trying to be a wise guy..u reply ah wise guy? No I am just a man. ... (play
the werd game)
Treat the judge like a heckler at your comedy act...flip it on them..don't let the ckler take
over the show...
Judge threatens u to take a notice out u drop the practicing on the bench ..are u giving me
legal advice...
If u judge says are u practicing law without a license u reply by asking the lawyer
prosecuting u if he has a license .. nobody has a license to practice law...law is just an
opinion..how can u get a license e for an opinion that's just nutty...law just like opinions
change all the time. If the prosecutor doesn't have a license we should stop theses
procediings and shut down this courthouse until everyone has a license....it sounds like all
the lawyers should go to jail for practicing without a license.
Look out u may not be charged with anything..check ur casefile..then ask the judge how
they are going to make a ruling? U just caught a judge with his pants down
Its your body u want to do cocain in that's ur biz...where does it say in the law that a man
can't put anything into his body.
If some one tries to tell u wat to do and be ur daddy well then they have to take care of u..
your going to ask for 1.2 million to cover your expenses in the future since they want to be
mom and dad..and pay like mom and dad

Following a judge's orders while remaining in honour as a man

281 | P a g e

Judges ask you to sit down to establish jurisdiction. Just look around stupidly first and ten
point to the seat and ask is anyone sitting there, because i would like to there. No objections
or claims this chair? then its my wish to have a seat.

Remember there is nothing there for you to talk too they are in a 2 dimensional world
dont respond to their order

On planet earth only a man can wish

The importance of having your claim filed when entering their court

When u have your claim on file and recorded go into court(or you are going to lose) and give
it to the bailiff to give to the magistragte or judge and let them know you dont care if your
guilty of all the charges so what we live in a common law land and there is no man who is
going to come forth and say i do wrong.
Point out to the judge that all the same people are here for both claim and complaint so lets
Hold the claim at the same time you hold complaint trial. They could complain that they got
21 days to answer the complaint but it only 8 words long so they wont have a strong
argument..but they could ask for 21 dyas!!! They need to answer a simple did he or did he
not trespass on the property? U could object and say this is a simple calim that needs to be
answered..but most will let it happen because they wont take ur 8 word claim serious!!

You are going to get all the charges discharged because this is a common law land and no
man has come forth claiming i did wrong!! U are an idiot and outsider of society a stranger
and do not subscribe.

With traffic tickets ur claim would be something like the man acting as a cop actually
stoped me and wasted my valuable time on a charge he claims that i did is something
wrongi havent done a damn thing wrong. There is affidavit on file this man just stopped
because i was speeding? According to who? I was taking my property from here to there at

282 | P a g e

the speed i thought was necessary and proper to me to function. If man or woman has a
problem with that let them file an affidavit.. so since the there isnt an affidavit on file i
require this matter to be discharged.

U may need to teach your judge!!

If they are asking u to plea u tell the magistrate that u require paper pen and ink as well as i
require a quick leave of court to properly respond to the magistrate so that nothing ccan be
misconstrued for the record..so that if i need to appeal something that someone above you
will know exactly what i am doing and tell you you better back off on this guy and i and
want to make sure that you clerk place this into the record..

There is no counter claim because they arent filing a claim against you..they have
compliant..
Noone is violating anything..it means they are putting their dick in you..
Intefeered with your right to move form point a to point b ..would be correct

Keep it short and sweet..

We have no civil rights we dont want them not do we claim them..know bodies tells us what
we have god told us wat we have!! We dont need anyone telling us what we do or dont
have!!

Sometimes a judge will threaten and suggest thing s to you like.. u better not bring this
claim of yours into this case or ever in my court houseits a suggestionwhich is
practicing law because it outside of his authority to do. U simple ask the judge are u telling
me how i should or should not defend myself??aare you practicing law on my behalf? Are
you practicing law form the bench? Because that not allowed!!

283 | P a g e

If a judge starts yelling at you ask why are u yelling at me , as i am stand right here, does
your microphone not work? remind him he is in a public setting you know this isnt private!!
Please conduct yourself accordingly as we are in the public forum now..

Who is a public defender actually protecting?

The public defender is placed with the defendant so they cant claim they dont understand
because they have an interpretor.. so watch out for the public defender
Its often the case when they are given to you the first they will ask you to do is to plead
guilty thats the angle!!you are the sacrifice!!

Give copies of your documents to the clerk, only surrender originals to the jury

If u have a hard time filing in the flesh.. then u send ur paper through register mail so that
they are forced to sign to prove the courthouse received it..now if the clerk refuse it they will
have to send it back with a letter..it usually says something ike you are not compling with
proper rules of civil procedure..they might not sign the letter but hopefully u have a typed
name
but at least u have proof on paper and the signature from the received mail.

It might only take 24 hours for the to reject your claim..next u should write a letter to the
man who acts like a clerk and the man act that sometimes acts as the building manager
that case is my property and youre using my property without my consent thats theft and
that makes it a trespass on my case and i am going to give you 3 days to correct your error.
(give ur phone number)
They may ignore this letter so and not even call you.. u will need to write another letter to
the same man who acts as a clerk and the man who sometimes act as the building

284 | P a g e

manager.. because you didnt do what i require just compensation i may file a claim for
$5000 and $500 for every lost day
This should be enough for them to allow your claim to move forward..or else u know what to
do nextfile a claim against them (probably in a different court)
When u get your case in there make sure it has a notice for it to remain sealed

Just let the man or women who play the parts of clerk and building manager that your
paperwork is property and they cant review it or study your property until it goes before a
jury.. u have to let them know that it is your property

Be prepared to explain to these clerks that first of are u speaing legalese or common English
parlance
Ask them if they know what a complaint is? They probably dont know? explain your claim is
not a complaint because complaint is saying u are whining.. do you does my docs whinning
or whailing.. then explain what is property and how the letter is your property because u
created those documents i spent my money , i spent my time. Does any body at the court
believesthey have and investment in my property? They may describe how it is done for
instance you do write your side of the story.blah blah blah..you respond with where do you
gfet off telling me how to wirte my claim they may say everybody does it their way u
respond just Because every body does it that way makes it the law? They may say those are
the rules of the court.. u say how do the rules of your court apply to a man?
I am filing a claim by right. I have to the right to stop the harm that is happening to me. Do
you dispute that?
They may say it a pleading and you again have to define a pleading for them..it means the
action of making an emotional or earnest appeal to someone.

But technically you have to understand its their property when u are handing it over to
them..you remind them that you are only give them a copy and that u have the original and
you will serve that directly to the jury.

285 | P a g e

If a court house it messing with your case get a claim adjuster to get the bond of the court
house and give you a estimate of the damage of trespass on your CLAIM so you can make
your claim for damages for the trespass!!!

Sometime building managers arent the chief justice and u may be getting the run around
from a clerk. U want the chief judge to accept your court into the building plus look out for
clercks trying to convert your case by filling motionswe dont have motions.look out for
judges calling u a plaintiff!!! You arent complaing so dont accept that title!! That is proof
positive that they are trespassing on your case..show your claims adjusterspecially have a
case after u notice the case being common law and they still do this stuff!! Notice of the
character of the man the nature is that of a man the character is that of a prosecutor not
that of a plaintiff. so watch out for judges trying to flip your case!!!
you put in notices that this case is to be determined by a jury not a judge or magistrate..
the magistrate need only serve as a witness the case and find that the facts are in support
of the claim and to witness the order that we give judges and require them to sign IF they
believe that the facts and claim are true and that they need to witness , along with the jury
and clerk and to move it on to a sheriff for execution!!

So what you do is build your case up putting all your notices in setting up your common law
court then you get the clerk to send off the summons.. that letter goes something like this
hi clerk lady, we just put in a summons into the case and the case is ready to move forward
we require you to make two complete copies to be prepared with the summons already in
the case to be delivered to the sheriff for execution on the parties through a process service.

If someone has a problem with you stuff tell them to put it on paper so if they are wrong you
can go after them [their bond]
Their might be a fight before you even get started!!!

Remember we are not putting our court into their court!!! We are bringing in my court at the
location of the public court house!!

286 | P a g e

- Pay and ask for endorsement, SSN and bank accounts, access to the courthouse

Pay and ask for an endorsement on the back of the check and make sure u send a letter
asking them to make sure they sign the back of the check . Simply send them a cheque, and
require to see the the endorsement on the back, knowing that agencies don't have hands in
which to sign. And not accepting a third party to sign for it, you want to make sure the
money got to the proper man or woman that you've wronged. timestamp at the court house
if thats here it happened How can the unites states of America sign the back of the
check?!!! So if anybody endorse it!!! U go after them by filing fraud for signing a cheque that
they dont have permission to endorse!!!
Dont be afraid of your passport or your SSN number. U can always turn off the capacity
when your want.

Getting justice when the CROWN is charging you, and just simply paying the Queen

How can a man get remedy if the prosecutor is the crown and the court is a the crown and
the judge wrks for the crown!!??

If u accept there summons to appear they have to accept your summons and invitation to
appear..so appear as a defendant and a man.. u will be able to flip it in the end because u
are a man and they trump administrative codes and statues!!!

We have the right to evoke common law.. the creator of thess courts can come forth in a
public court housem and tell a judge and prosecutor to hold his horses there because man
created u.. and u cant harm your creator and i certqinly know you wish to harm me..bob, joe,
suzy!!! If they say im acting as a judge.. well you tell them there acting skills and acting
abilities are going to cause me harm as a man. So do u want to put your acting to to side

287 | P a g e

and realize that there is a man before u. have i caused any harm to any man? They should
respond NOwell then you should stop before you harm me and i lay a claim against you..

If they say its the queen ask then to be specific they need to be specific of which queen
elizbeth it needs to be specific ..is it Elizabeth Alexandra Mary; born 21 April 1926?
If these people realy want to play this lunacy that the queen is charging you with you then u
play it with them and pay the queen of england..ask the clerk for the queends address of
bucking ham palace and u tell them ur going to write the cheque out to the queen for what
eveer the judgment is and you write a cheque for $5 or whatever u can afford at the time
and attach a letter dear queen Elizabeth, it appears to be a judgemnet on your behalf in
your name and i believe they have awarded you $10, 000,000 but the best i can do right
now is $5 a week but if you are really hard up to pay your bills and u need me to pay more
let me know but if your sitting pretty and you really dont need more than that; i hope u
accept this and i will continue paying this monthly and i will tget to the business of paying
this off and i wish that you sign your cheque on the back to endors it just to ensure that the
proper funds went to the proper queen elizbeth mary. and make sure it gets sent out
from the court house to evidentiate it all u have to do is get that get from the bank if
they evr endors the $5 cheque and turn around and sell that autograph for $20

If she ever cashed a cheque u could move to fraud because she never moved the case at
all.. you do this by saying i dont remember this charge and challenge the cheque and file a
claim

If a crown wants to say whatever dont challenge it.. just like a person who see a ufo dont
challenge ..u dont knowu also dont need to care because there is no damage done and
there is no man who is going to come forward and claim any damage loss or harm in a
common law court!!

Filing fees for a claim, and establishing common law at the courthouse

Do not accept them calling u mister Mitchell because that is not my name.. my name is robin
Mitchell

288 | P a g e

If they clerk wants to reject your claim because all they accept is complaints fine because u
have a remedy for that..u will go after any man or woman mailing your claim back to me
without a case number is wrong. So if they have a problem with accepting complaints u say i
am not giving it to you; i am give it to my public court house and i am expecting you my
public servant to record it in the proper section of my public court house. I am not giving u
court clerk a complaint!!!

That case number is no more than an identification tab that gets put on your case with your
claim so they can locate it when the jury is seated

Just ask them what they think complaint isi am not whining do you see me whining nor
is this a pleading because i am not begging anyone for anything.. then ask them what they
think a claim is!!

They w=may say im going to file it for you but your $400 is going to non refundable!!
Respond with as u know nobody has permission to trespass on my case and if that
happened i would seek a remedy for that!! but there is no need to talk about that because
no harm has been done!!
I am a not paying a $400 application fee i am paying for the rental of the room for the
duration of that case..it might be a person filing a complaint but not for a man!!!
to cover your ass because u dont want them to use your cheque for joinder is u put down
that it is for a donation and no license in formed..

New Hampshire Bill of Rights (1784)

[Art.] 14. [Legal Remedies to be Free, Complete, and Prompt.] Every subject of this
state is entitled to a certain remedy, by having recourse to the laws, for all injuries he may
receive in his person, property, or character; to obtain right and justice freely, without being
obliged to purchase it; completely, and without any denial; promptly, and without delay;
conformably to the laws.

Courts might have a tough time accepting all your hand written notices and fillingsand u
may find your judge having a hard time letting the Mitchell court into his court..

289 | P a g e

I believe my summons covers the necessary points of law(for hand written notes)

What were are in essense trying to do is convert the court over to a common law court
before the other party shows up

If u have a case that was a complaint before and u converted it to a claim ..then success is
on the horizon for you

Sometimes it is just easier to start a brand new complaint than to convert and old one

Should I file a claim at County or District court?

tort claims act

n. a federal or state act which, under certain conditions, waives governmental immunity and
allows lawsuits by people whoclaim they have been harmed by torts (wrongful acts), includin
g negligence, by government agencies or their employees.These acts also establish the proc
edure by which such claims are made. Before the enactment of tort claims acts, government
bodies could not be sued without the specific permission of the government. The Federal ver
sion is the Federal Tort Claims

district courts are top notch (institutionalized corruption) so you are going to battle with the
best!! U could find yourself spending a good 40 min debating with an entire clerk staff..of
course when u get to the head clerk its probably only going to take minutes

290 | P a g e

any controversy (us) that is over $20 dollars can be settled in a court look at article 7 bill of
rigths of 7th amendement in the constitution..

u can transfer the case later(not sure why)

Dismissed charges may be used against you along with your current charges

They will bring dismissed charges to life and offer u plea deals. The can renew the charges!!!
Get them discharged!!

- Definition of "dare" in contract law

Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed

It is assuming the liability of the debt.

A judge may say i wouldnt dare!!! U need to say u do dare which means u wiil presume and
assume and bare all liability of this contract

- Accepting charges as a PERSON knowing that you're still a man

291 | P a g e

Go in to court both as a man and as a person..enter as a defendant and then we are going to
flip it
If they want you to come in as a defendant fine but accept that everything they charge you
with;
The defendant may be guilty but who cares because you realize u are talking to a man? Who
cares if the defendant is guilty. I am alos my mamas baby boy, i am also her bitch , but no
other man can tell me wat to doam i a son ..yes am i a child .. yescan they punish me
yes..but not a manand since your not my mom or my dad u cant punish me and dicipline
me..unless u think ur my mom dad or creator??

Handling threats and deception from a Judge

Nolo contendere is a legal term that comes from the Latin for "I do not wish to contend." It is
also referred to as a plea of no contest.

Never trust a plea deal with a state prosecutor because they can promise u the moon and
back but if there is a mandatory sentencing that is applied on that charge too bad they dont
have to reveal that to you..

But if a judge wants u to plea nolo contendere u say u dont know what it means and if it
means i can get out of here then fine. But make sure u notice the courts and write that no
man has come forth before this court and made a claim that i a man have done wrong or
cause any injury any damage any harm and nobody has accrued a loss and this is a common
law land. Where man is the creator of governmentman is the creator o fthis court..man is
the creator of the position u maintain in this courtjudgeand i am a man and i am giving
notice to this court that there is a man before this court.and do as you wish

Judge's orders must be processed the same day, and not knowing their rules of court

292 | P a g e

This is how it works..

Anytime a judge issues an order or motions he may make rulings on from the bench those
court clerks have to sit there and makes ure they are all time stamped and filed into the
proper casefile the same day or until the morning hours there is no order that sits on
somebodies table overnightit cant be done!!
The day the judge issue the order is the day it should be time stamped baring its a case
that goes into the wee hour of the morning..

Dealing with police and courts

Our jurisdiction is what we say to them. We know that polices jurisdiction does not lie past
this threshold, if you have jurisdiction past this threshold you would not be standing outside
my door, youd be kicking it in right now.
When were in our home we are safe, they cannot demand us to answer them.

Dont invite them in, dont go out, dont answer to name. DONT. ANSWER.

When they ask are you Robin?,

reply with question are you questioning me? I require my attorney to be present when
questioned, or I wish to remain silent for anything I say may be used against me in the court
of law. Are you here in an official capacity as an officer of the court?
they ask are you Robin?
reply with I take that as you agreeing to what I just said, as youre talking to me as an
officer of the court. And at this time I wish to be let alone.
They ask are you Robin?
Reply with Whats your name? whats your badge number? I wish you to cease and desist
and leave me in peace

293 | P a g e

If judge is late to court, put in a notice that I was here on time, I have things to do instead of
wasting my time here; were all summoned to be in court on this date at this time, if you
cant be bothered to show up at the appropriate time, youre in contempt of court for not
showing up on time, not me. (get time stamp, put in record)
I did my duty I showed up, now Im going home.

Your words as good as mine, get a third party impartial witness.

Get out of jailgo to court and ask for forgiveness. Just bring the man or woman that I
trespassed upon, so I can be given forgiveness for what Ive done wrong. If no man or
womans gonna come forth and make a claim, I wish to be let go.

The judges probably just issues warrant as a curtesy for the other people present (so the
other people in the courtroom dont have to wait)

We can witness by hearing something, and testify to what we heard. There are no rules in
common law, only rules in statutory.

Show me on the summons papers where does it say that I have to show up on time AND wait
until you show up as well. What if you dont show up? Im not going to wait indefinitely.
Youre late, youre in contempt of court.

Ill be glad to appear to any man or woman that hes done wrong to, but well not appear as
defendant, Ill not play the silly defendant game with those silly statutes. Ill only appear as
man, I dont have contract with you people, I dont believe Im bound by statutes. Im not
part of your society, Ive never said that Im an active member of your club. Far as Im
concerned Im an idiot to whatever you folks wish of me. if you want to talk man to man, Ill
be more than competent. If you want to start on some legal jargon and try to hold me liable
for doing something wrong in your little legalese society, I have no clue about the legal
society or the terms or the jargons that you guys use. And I have a belief that theres no
requirement as a man to know any of your legalese nonsense.

294 | P a g e

Make sure when we have an encounter, we have microphones to record for 3 rd party
impartial witness.

I am not the person, I can represent the person.

Anyone who wants to come in as a defendant? Let them in. defendants can only curl up and
take a beating.
But there may be too many, so tell the judge that we dont have the resources to take on
this many defendants.

If a boss wants to enter as a defendant, thats lovely but not right now. Its true that they
were responsible since they were training the man who injured me, but well get them
afterwards. Not right now.

How are they going to explain in accordance to common law, that centralized governments
have some sort of jurisdiction over man?

Karl will take position as defendant IF theres not going to be a man showing up to prosecute
the claim. Absolutely have a claim already filed if you are going to go in as defendant.

We can start our own nation just like Indians can make their own nations on their
reservations. It will be outside of the government jurisdiction. Start our own court, and when
we have a ruling, itll be recognized across the land by other courts.

***Find out who is in control of the agency and make them accountable, then its not State
vs. man, its man vs. man. If they dont want to take on the liability, then we say so youre
saying theres a corporation/ship out there that no ones claiming? Then Ill take over that
agency/corporation.

295 | P a g e

Case is surrendered to the court when its presented to the public, we cant deny people
from coming into the case, but we can notice the court that we dont have the ability to
take on more defendants at this time

If youre at a hearing then its not a judge, its a hearing officer.

If theyre denying our mckenzy friend status, then well just become a co-claimant. This will
give us standing to speak in that court.

When a man fails to answer your claim

Order the judge to get an arrest warrant for the man or woman who has failed to show up
An arrest warrant (also officially called warrant of arrest in the Philippines) is a warrant
issued by a judge or magistrate on behalf of the state, which authorizes the arrest and
detention of an individual, or the search and seizure of an individual's property.

If we go to court and theyre giving us the all caps name, simply write a note to the clerk
requiring our name to be spelled correctly. Forcing the clerk who wont be able to do this
unless we require them by writing.

21 days that we wait after we file a claim, is for the other side to defend themselves or file
their claim in response.

Watch out for courts resending us paperwork and slipping in the all-caps name again. Check
ALL documents. Fix paperwork, send it back to them requiring to amend it. Im requiring
you to acknowledge these errors if you cant fix it, then at least send me a letter
acknowledging your errors.

Tell the bailiff that were not here for a default judgement. I want him to come in and I want
it to be on his record.

296 | P a g e

I require the judge to get the bailiff to get an arrest warrant. They should be familiar with the
process they do it to members of the public all the time.

Sometimes well go after a public official, and they get their boss involved, we dont want
that. Make it clear were going after the man, not the office, and they should be on their way
out of our court. The last time the USA was involved, they got away with sovereign immunity
in their own courts.

If they want sovereign immunity they can have it, make Mr. United States of America a COdefendant, not THE defendants.

When ur prosecuting someone and nobody shows up thats a default judgment. Its not a win
because a defendant can put it back in play because he would like to defend it after the
fact..

A ordinary man on man in court where one man wins and one man loses that is a summary
judgement

( if u have a won case that has been discharged).. Make a compensation claim for court
cost . it is a sweet threat if a lawyer or prosecutor doesnt settle down

Mckenzie friend is like next friend in America.

if someone is going to give u a title like that and ur unsure just restate your position i
conditionally accept ur offer for me to be a mckenzie friend to get the show on the road so
long as u realize that in doesnt negate the fact that i am here to present my fathers case to
the court

297 | P a g e

Every court is a court of record..u have to expressly under the common law if England or the
common law under blackstone edition 4 that u have the right to evoke a court of record in
there beliefs which I believe r ur beliefs ( the judge) means it only moves under the common
law , where the magistrate is independent of the tribunal.
Be specific by wat u mean by court of record
Look up court of Rd cord on blackstone sec. 378 or black law 4th edition. where it is only
man on man and no officer or agent of the government can not testify unless he takes the
oath as a man.
U need to be specific because they may have named it the people court or claims court.
..they have several names for that definition...
I am evoking a court of record see exhibit a ( )
Or notice that ur vourt defibes what a court of record is.the magistrate and the court clerk is
independent of the tribunal and I don't want anybody to review my case until it comes
before the jury..the tribunal consist of I the prosecutor the wrong doer and the jury..I don't
want any body's eyes on the case in the case, touching the case or trespassing on this case.
Evoking the Mitchell court and what does that mean...

Be wary of using karl lentz or anyone else letters as a templatized approach.make your own
and know what yhe words mean thst ur using...The problem with templates is that once
courts catch on the courts will start rejecting your paperwork. ..because u better know what
it means u wrote.. and the courts are going to test ur metal...so if u can't handle rejection
well they will get u there..u must be prepared for it. .it's like dealing with a woman rejection
u....don't get mad get smooth..
Write to them" I believe that I am a man. And I believe that somebody rejected this. Who is
the man or woman who rejected this and Interfered with my right to access these courts.
Who believes I am a reject?why did they make such a claim?
Who trespassed on my case?

a return of property hearing you give the prosecutor a chance to make his claim for the
property

If u are on parole or have a court of order that doesnt allow u to leave the stateand have a
return of property hearing you are basically saying lets go back to way things were before
the contract startif you were in prison or about to go to prison and you signed your parole
contract to stay out of jail then they are going to get rid of your parole and place u back in
prisonwhich was the way things were before u signed..

298 | P a g e

Andy Warhol had a ton of assistant painting his painting for him but it was the artist
signature at the bottom that takes all credit but more importantly all liability for it as well
so the only person who signed that document is you? Making u responsible!!

If your are in the middle east and you stole something they cut your hand off these are the
customs of these peopleso you better tell them that you dont subscribe to their customs
and beliefe way before they cut your hands off or too late!!
same applies with this culture once the cuff are on and you signed the document and
havent told them that you are a man with all his rights before they interfere with them well
too bad for you!!

Man will find himself in trouble not for the things he did but more for the thing he didnt do!!

We dont represent our self in courtwe present ourselves in court..

Just because some code says you shoot small children in the head doesnt make it right..
So if your code gives you permission to break in and violate my rights, in time when the dust
settles you will see that one man cant trespass on another man property
so you make a claim on the man(not the officer) who kick down your door

a classic thing they do is try and move a queen bench case over to queen bench division..
what you have to do is go down there and find out which man or woman has transferred you
case over and ask them whats the odds of a non crown officer like myself winning in a
crown court against the crown? There is the reason we have two court running in this
country..we have the crown and Queens bench [common law] in case the crown gets out of
hand.
where does a man have redress when a crown has done wrong? We have the right to go
before queen and countrywe dont have to go to a crown court to evoke our right as a
man.
we have to know how to walk into a court and make a claim to need the building to carry on
the peoples business.
the people business needs to be heard, i have a matter that the people need to hear, i am
one of the people, this is my court,this is my public building i need to open up shop and run

299 | P a g e

this place..so court clerk i need you to do this this and this. Senior judge magistrate i
need you to assemble this this and this we have to give them the order requiring your
needs. Its not there job to show oyu how to be a king or queenthats our job

When u walk inot a cour u have to know how ot use it.. a quenn would walkm in and ask
where is the officer of this court? where is the court clerk? Where is the magistrate
because i need this court assembled. Magistrate u go seek the jury members i need 12
chief judge i need a room get me the this list of witness and get the sheriff or what ever you
use to summons these witnesses to appear.. court clerk lady issue summons, ill create the
orders and u dispatch them forthwith.

Why would the courts teach u to beat them???

Say u go to a court house a t night and you have business and they want to close the
doors u ask what would they do if the queen came herethey should answer they would
open the court up for her. She works at the pleasure of the people and i am one of the
people and i am coming in and u go in ..they will say thngs like i am going to get head of
security here. U say god bless u because he is the one who gonna make the magic happen.
And he knows wats going on and he knows wats i say is true..

None in a crown court will ever sya u did anything wrong!!!

Crown is a creation of manthe creation of man is considered a monsterso you know and
he knows (the officer) tha he know his is giving his fellow man up to the monster, to a
machine, and he know the crown is going to hurt man..so i am going to hold u liable for it..
As a man u have only a duty and obligation to your fellow man not to the crownjudge has
a duty and obligation ot the crown
We have to understand that as a man we have no duty to answer to answer any member of
the crown..but you do have an obligation to answer any man!!!its that simple

300 | P a g e

We have to understand that the crown is a creation of man and if does harm to us we just
are going to pull the plug on our creation.
We are going to pull your charter

They are supposed to treat pople with no respect..look at the bible wat do u expect!!!

The court is a public building and you are going to access this public building and i am going
to hold court and i am going to invite my neighborugh to come in here and those
ni=eighborughs are going to judge them as a fellow man..

Man created this building for the use of man in the future ..i am that future man and what
man is now interfering with my ability to access thes curts? Just tell what what is fair and
just and reasonable to pay for access because i understand the court clerk and judges have
to get paid and then lets get the show on the road.. its is a slippery road for the crown to set
the price for access to justice because it is as important as water that it should be provided
for freeif its too much then use the court are free to the people position..but for now just
pay wats is fair
occupy a public building..say your not going to cause any damage..and if i do i know what
the penaly is that i will go to jail and that i will owe compensation..but the fact that i am the
public makes me a crazy animal that is going to destrpoy stuff..i know how to behave like
the queen of England. U woyuldnt throw the queen out she woyuldnt have armed guards she
would tell u i want to be alone and if i need u i will call for you..ur a public servant and i am
the public i will call u whe i need you and dont follow me i will call u when i need u.

When we believe a member of the crown has done us worng what court other than a crown
court can a man sek compensation or redress? And let him say there is no other court so
when a corwn official does you worng you have to go in fornt of the crown and let the crown
decide whethere a crown official did you wrong or noti am going to tell 500 people that
they is no justicy for them..

During one of the days they let people paruse through ..just walk through and whnem u see
an empty room make a cliam for it and say your going to set up a clercks office and run
queens bench out of it. Occupy these building and make a people court because whene
the crown gets out of hand because some code has allowed him to shot a baby in the head
we are going to start our own peoples court and drag that man before it and make him anser
as a man for shooting the babybecause they will always be liable to man..

301 | P a g e

Public defender, serving notices at hearing, rescind vs. modify a contract

Be prepared for the judge to spend a lot of time trying to persuade us to get a lawyer.
Because a lawyer becomes an interpreter of language (legalese) and thus making us
competent to take on the person hat (well have understanding).

If we have a lawyer, put a notice into our court file stating that we no longer need a lawyer.
Make it official that were getting rid of the lawyer.

Be prepared at this point that the court judges and justices and clerks will block us from
filing notices into our court. So we use the post office to mail notices to our own court, if
anyone prevents us theyll be committing mail fraud.

Make copies of notices, hand one to the magistrate in court, hand another copy after court
to the clerk, make sure its time stamped by the clerk.

Lawyers always have a duty/loyalty to the court first before us.

The legal society along the way will always send us letters addressing us Mr.Smith or
Mrs.Smith, we must catch them and correct them saying I dont go by Mr.Smith, my name
is Robin Mitchell

A judge may ask Mr.Smith, do you think blah blah blah, dont let them hook us with a Mr
in our title, we must not answer to that title, always put it in writing and file in a notice, then
ask if theyve received our notice? have they read it? do you need more time to read it?

302 | P a g e

Try not to do more talking in court.

Whatever they ask, we should answer with a question of did you get my notice about
jurisdiction? did you get my notice about immediate return of property?

Lawyer is not our daddy, we are in charge. I require you to take notice of these notices.
When you have a lawyer, they dont allow you to make any decisions because you are
incompetent.

If a judge is pressuring us to take on a lawyer, we just ask back are you offering me legal
advice? (because that would make him liable) do you want to be held liable for your legal
advice?

Is there a law that says I have to have a lawyer? Can you point to the law that applies to I a
man?
A judge will not break our legs if we dont take a lawyer.

To get a probation officer was based on a contract/term to get us out of prison. We dont
want to rescind these terms otherwise itll and us back in prison. We should modify instead
of rescind.

Go back to the court of original jurisdiction where they had this probation/terms placed upon
us, and say at this time I no longer see any benefit of x/y/z, and I want to modify it a little
bit. Because doing what you want me to do is causing me injury/harm/loss of property, and I
know you folks dont wanna be a source of harm/injury/loss to a man because thats why you
exist. You exist to benefit man and to help man out. Youre here to help us, not to hurt us.
Write this in a letter, act nice.

Buy land, get a bond for free, they think because of this were not a flight risk.

303 | P a g e

Get a process server when sending out your paperwork to the man or woman not the agent
or officer
u will get an affidavit stating the specific time the man or woman was served
If a court ever tells you youre not following civil procedures, then were going about this
the right way because we are operating in common law.
if you are sewing a social worker or government type look out for the protect your team
syndrome.. the system will defend itself..and the system includes the court.. u may have a
high public official interfere with your case..
Be prepared to fend off these challenges..they will test your metal..
some feel that sending out a ton of preemptive notices is the way to go butits like telling
people not to step on your toes before anyone ever stepped on them.. is presumptuous to
say someone is going to do something wrong before the do it..so prepare your notices and
be thoughtful of what may come but dont file notices until they actually do some thing
wrongand they will test you because when u open your case it has no boundaries and
anyone can do anything if u let them so expect them to test your walls then pull out
your walls (notices) and let them see your metal..

U may get the clerk forcing u to use there paperwork.. Simply and kindly and
unthreatinglinlyg ask for the bond of the man or woman who is obstructing me from doing
my filling.. they will back off until the head clerk comes in and then u will see how they back
off.. again testing your metal..

Remember your ar not IN their superior courtyou in your court at the superior court

Another way is to write a disclaimer on it for easy of use and then change all the titles.if
they still mess with you and reject your paperworkjust file it there way and then modify
your claim after the fact

304 | P a g e

You may find yourself with the clerks offices rejecting your paperwork and sending it back
what you do is mail it in using the post office with registered mail..
Get the post master or post mistress to date stamp your documents they should start
accepting it as this is setting them up for mail fraud as none can interfere with mail being
delivered to your courtit is like an address..

The public statutes at large of the United States of America: from ..., Volume 4

The following year, 1775, Franklin was appointed by the Continental Congress as its
first Postmaster General, a position he served in until late in 1776 when Franklin was called
upon to serve his country in other ways.

The creation of the Post office occurs before the creation of the seat of the government, and
is placed in authority over the seat of government.

The Post Office and the International Postal Union

305 | P a g e

The role of the United States Post Office and the Universal Postal Union became a factor in
our lawsuits because of several bankruptcies that the United States has been through over
the history of the country. When one declares himself a bankrupt, that person is no longer
legally competent to conduct his affairs. The court becomes a fiduciary, and appoints a
trustee to oversee the affairs of the bankrupt. It does not matter if the bankrupt is a
common man, or a nation; except that a nation still has a right to conduct war. Typically the
average person anywhere in the world thinks of their Postal System as a part of, and
subservient to, their government. However, the postal system in the United States has a
different legal history than one would expect.
The Post Office and Judicial Courts were established before the seat of the Government. On
Thursday, Sept. 17, 1789 we find written, Mr. Goodhue, for the committee appointed for the
purpose, presented a bill to amend part of the Tonnage act, which was read the first time.
The bill sent from the Senate, for the temporary establishment of the Post Office, was read
the second and third time, and passed. The bill for establishing the Judicial Courts . . . , for
establishing the seat of government . . . 11[11] Other references to the Post Office support
my theory of the founding forefathers views:
POST OFFICE
1. A place where letters are received to be sent to the persons to whom they, are
addressed.
2. The post office establishment of the United States, is of the greatest importance to the
people and to the government. The constitution of the United States has invested congress
with power to establish post offices and post roads. Art. 1, s. 8, n. 7.
3. By virtue of this constitutional authority, congress passed several laws anterior to the
third day of March 1825, when an act, entitled "An act to reduce into one the several acts
establishing and regulating the post office department," was passed. 3 Story, U. S. 1825. It is
thereby enacted,
1. That there be established, the seat of the government of the United States, a general
post office, under the direction of a postmaster general. 12[12]
We need to take notice where the commas are placed on that last sentence. That there be
established, the seat of the government of the United States, a general post office, under
the direction of a postmaster general. When I set off a clause with commas, I make sure
that the sentence makes sense without that clause. Taking out the set-off clause, we
read . . . the seat of the government of the United States under the direction of a
postmaster general.
[11] Gales and Seatons History [H. of R.], p. 928.

[12] Bouvier, John. Law Dictionary. Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of The United
States of America And of the Several States of the American Union, With References to the
Civil and Other Systems of Foreign Law. In the Philadelphia, by theChilds & Peterson. (1856)

The creation of the Post office occurs before the creation of the seat of the government, and
is placed in authority over the seat of government. What is the effect of these legal
techniques? The stated position of an object and the sequence of events play an important
role in the Universal-Legal-Technology. The effect is that the Governments later bankruptcies

306 | P a g e

in 1859 and 1929 have no legal effect upon the solvent Post-Office. We can make a case
that the formation of the Post-Office before the formation of the governments operations is
a stroke of dumb luck. Perhaps it is ingenious, since communication has a higher value than
government itself. If any government fails, the people still have a need to communicate with
one another to form a new government. And to this day, the Post-Office is still solvent and
operational, ready to fulfill its duty to help the people in their communications; to set a new
government should a complete break down of the existing governmental structures occur in
the United States. Sounds like a very good back up plan.
The formation of the Universal Postal Union in 1874 has another legal effect that is very
important to the Universal-Legal-Technology. The Universal Postal Union unites member
countries into a single, worldwide postal territory. 13[13] We have already learned that any
litigant is going into international jurisdiction every time he goes to any court. Since the
litigant needs to establish that his papers are official, he uses a dollar???? postage stamp on
the face of the first page. The stamps also invoke postal statutes and the Universal Postal
Union jurisdiction. Currently in the U. S., the stamp of choice is the fox (discontinued 22
April 2004 or earlier) U. S. dollar postage stamp. The stamp is not drawn in a box, making
the forty-five-degree lines unnecessary. The litigant does, however, need to autograph
across the stamp, then date the autograph, for two reasons: to comply with postal
regulations concerning private mail carriers, and to make a continuance of evidence that the
process (paper work) is mail. The continuation of evidence is less of a factor, since the
definitions of mail and delivery can include a clerk at a grocery store handing a
customer a receipt for groceries. One can see that Standaring had his shipping clerk wired
with the Bill of Lading.
The legal writers were forced to make the definitions wide enough to encompass the private
rural carriers, and private advertisers that have placed advertisements on our doorsteps, or
in our hands. I have thought about this issue a lot, and I did not find any other better
alternative. Any loophole would have devastated many consumers, and caused a plethora of
other laws to be enacted to cover the loophole.
Additionally, on the back of the first page, we authenticate the authority of the Post-Office
with an endorsement, and simultaneously authenticate our identity by placing a postage
meter stamp, from a postage meter machine that we have purchased in advance, on the
lower quarter of the back of the first page. All commercial papers have endorsements to
authenticate their authenticity. Again, we autograph across the meter stamp, and date. The
postage meter stamp is better than a regular stamp, and stamps are said to have rendered
seals superfluous. 14[14] The purchase of a meter machine requires identification in case
the meter machine is tampered with or is stolen. The meter number on the meter stamp can
be traced back to the owner (litigant), and therefore authenticates the endorser better than
any seal.
What are we doing by placing our paper work into the jurisdiction of the Universal Postal
Union? To answer that question, we need to look at the structure and finance of that
organization. The official aims and purposes of the Universal Postal Union (UPU) are two: to
form a single postal territory for the reciprocal exchange of correspondence; and to
secure the organization and improvement of the postal services and to promote in this
sphere the development of international collaboration. [15] The organization of the
circulation of the international mail is based on the freedom of transit, . . . as a result,
therefore, only by enduring absolute freedom of transit can the effectual universality of the
postal territory be attained. * * * Freedom of transit is guaranteed throughout the entire
territory of the union. Administrations may exchange, through the intermediary of one or
more of their number, both closed mails and open mail according to the needs of the traffic
and the requirements of the service. 16[16]

307 | P a g e

Starting in 1878, the union created a category for territories which were recognized as non
independent but which were given all the rights of union membership afforded to clearly
independent countries. 17[17] So the members of the union have been operating as
sovereign, independent countries, and their currency is based on the gold French Franc. Gold
is the acceptable form of money in international jurisdictions, or paper backed by gold.
18[18] When we purchase postal money orders, the money order is backed by gold, not the
fiat money called Federal Reserve Notes. The FRNs, as some call them, are based instead
on a promise to pay a debt. The debt is based only upon the full faith and credit of the
United States, and lacks any intrinsic value.
Some of the obligations in the convention can, in some states, be introduced into domestic
practice without involving a nations legislative process or without even reaching the desk of
the chief executive. 19[19] The Union also sets forth the principle that postal
administrations are responsible for loss of, theft from, or damage to, insured items, and then
goes into detail about exceptions to the principle of responsibility, cessation of responsibility,
how the sender is indemnified, and the manner in which responsibility is apportioned
between postal administrations. 20[20] There was only one instance, according to the
Belgium delegate, where the bureau would have any power even approximating the right to
intervene in the affairs of administrations, that is in the arbitration of disputes, but in this
instance the bureau could act only when requested to do so by an administration. 21[21]
The Functions of the International Bureau for the Universal Postal Union include acting as a
clearinghouse for information concerning postal matters. It also functions as a clearinghouse
for international postal accounts and as a conciliator and arbitrator in disputes over postal
matters between administrations. 22[22]
[13] 1997 Encyclopedia Britannica
[14] Collon, Dominique, Editor. 7000 Years of Seals. In the London, for the Trustees of the
British
Museum, by the BRITISH MUSEUM PRESS. 1997. p. 153.
[15] Universal Postal Union, p. 73.
[16] Universal Postal Union, p. 74.
[17] Universal Postal Union, p. 80.
[18] The backing of paper does not necessarily have to be gold, it can be anything real at
market
value like timber, oil, minerals, metals, land, etc.
[19] Universal Postal Union, p. 96.
[20] Universal Postal Union, p. 103.
[21] Universal Postal Union, p. 186.
[22] Universal Postal Union, p. 195

So, what we are doing, by placing the postage stamp on our admiralty paperwork and
endorsement on the back of the first page, is using the authority of the sovereignty of the
longest surviving, solvent, governmental authority in the United States. Through the
admiralty, we are taking the Post-Office and the judicial system back some two hundred
years, and simultaneously creating a new territory with all the rights of union membership
afforded to clearly independent countries. We are establishing the laws in this new territory
with the paper work that we have filed. As we will see later, we are also correcting the errors
of the founding forefathers; in that we are also bringing the equal rights that they neglected
to give to all the people in the United States. We are eliminating all of the legal deficiencies
that handicap the sovereign status of us, the people, within the court. We are guaranteed
that all of the parties in the case: the clerk, judge, bailiff, and litigants have the freedom of
transit in the admiralty court. If the clerk, judge, or other official fails to deliver our

308 | P a g e

documents as directed, or delay them, or obstruct them, that person is faced with several
penalties within the postal statutes and admiralty statutes. The final advantage is that if we
are obstructed, because of the transitory nature of the action, we are in the admiralty and
can take the case offshore for adjudication in any court in the world.

By getting the post office to timestamp your paperwork your are putting under their
jurisdicition which pre dates the constitution which places it under common law(this is
what a man has to do on America at the united states courts because America was founded
by british colonist who were practicing common law hence invoking common law with the
post offices jurisdictional power reinforces your positionsometimes the only way of getting
your mail to your court
Its a felony to interrupt the service of mailthe clerks no better
bill of lading--- and officially way of doing this, is with the county recorders office and get a
certified copy of your paperwork. This makes your paperwork the vessel and the content
becomes the cargo. And the county recorder office acts as the customs office for the ship
This is a fantastic way of stablish the common law jurisdiction..

Go to the head clerk and simply ask isnt it obstruction the delivery of mail whne i am trying
to delivery mail to the Mitchell court? remember you are not delivering mail to their
court your delivery mail to your court

Just make it clear you are delivering mail to your court not their court..what authority do
they have to obstruct paid mail from being delivered to your court from the post office not
the us postal service ? do i have to report this fraudulent activity to the post inspector/ post
master?

Only one form refers to the post office and that is registered mail. Registered mail is always
held under lock and key. And its not more expensive than express mail..its about $12
(2015) and u can go back 3 days later and get a certified log of everyone whos hand has
touched that piece of mail

Watch out for them setting up parallel court in their court not in your court at their
building..
your case is your property because u paid for it.. if they cross those line make sure u put in a

309 | P a g e

notice of property and trespass if they want to interfere with your case..
after you serve someone u have to waits 21 days for them to answer your claim or else
there room left for a court date after that.. make sure u fill the copies of it into the case..
and then give them notice that the man or woman has been served to the satisfaction of the
mithcell court. ( u should get a affidavit of service form the process server)..

After you have gotten the affidavit of service from the process server write a letter to the
clerk.

Greetings Luanne(process servor name),

I require you to record in case ######### the affidavit of service served upon bob
richards(whom evre it was u served) . please know that the man has been served according
to the requiremetns of the Mitchell(your courts name) court. I now require u to set a trial
date (make sure that the date aksed for is 21days after the date u served the man) and is
she has any questions to please first check with your first chief judge and he doesnt satisfy
your curiosity i will be glad to help you out..
cheers,
robin
if 21 days passes and they man doesnt answer the claim let the clerk know in writting
that you have the right to have a final decision and that u will not settle for a default
judgemnet and that they should issue a warrant or a capiuos and have the man brought in
to answer this claimhe has to be given due procress which is the opportunity to answer the
claim before the court.
look at karls interference notice when anyone messes with your case.
if someone is interfering with your case( an attorney general protection his minions)ask
them if they have any first hand knowledge of the case? Well thank god and we dont need
any more input form you then.. good day

Or tell them that if they continue you will benefit them with their own case.

310 | P a g e

You want to let them know as you go who you are and what the rules are as they break them
not sending a million notices which are basically warnings before someone has done
anything wrong can be a little off putting like waring people of steeping on your toes
before anyone has stepped on your toe!

Appoint your court a clerk and then ask her to recommend 3 judges for their ability to
discern common law and experience in common law (this lets them know u are going to
have a common law case)

Look at filing notices (karls has great ones) for jurisdiction, notice of venue at there vs in,
not sure how to get warrants and force them to drag people into courts!!!
cant one just get a default judgement take your win and get a sheriff to collect.. this will
force the man or woman out to defend themselves which means u have them dead center or
they just allow u to do things like getting the sheriff to till tip!!??

Whne they do it to use there is a court form that they fill out that says under penalty of
perjury that what is being requested..the arrest is true and relative..
Makes sure u have a notice of interference in your case because of its broad application. And
then make a notice much like the above during the administrative side when they are
dragging you into court
read how they do their arrest just to mirror but in a way that doesnt jeopardize the
common law case..

Notice of property in your case..this case and all of its contents are solely my property..cf.[a
bill of lading]
thye can not interfeer with the shipment of cargo. Just like they cant touch your property

311 | P a g e

Get the judge to put their order in writing and sign it

Do not contractsay u dont understand anything in a court room. They may try a trick
question: is it u dont understand or dont agree? U say i dont understand and i dont agree
is the proper answer to their false choice question

U can call the clerks office to see with your case file number what order a judge has
executed in whatever hearing or place in time when it occurred or not .

If u hold your ground and never agree to anything u will be surprised how little power they
have

that is why they always want you to accept the name.. because if u accept the name you
accept the office if u accept the office u become a trustee.. what does a trustee do? They
have duties and obligations

a judge is a judge of person within her authority and capacity and dominion over but they
have no dominion over man. Only god is our judge.. a your blood is your creation hence your
property..
so if a judge is tell you to do something with your property [child] u ask the judge our you
administrating my property? if the judge says yes , then tell him to put it in writing and sign
it. And when you see your child next time and u have to leave the scene.. send the judge a
bill for complying with his order because u will write him i saw my property [you know her
as my daughter] and stayed away form her.. here is a bill for $1000,000 for following your
orders

312 | P a g e

judges are very aware specially in bc.. if you place and order like to reappear and u get it in
writing and signed by the judge and u reappear, well then u can give the judge a bill ..

ask a jugde to give u and order (remember its not your judge) as a man to man or woman to
woman and say give me a signed order so i can provide a service if the judge ordered 300
hundred pizza he is liable for it!!
If a judge refuses to pay then demand a hearing over the matter

When u step into the public its all based on contract and breach of contract do u have
jurisdiction and authority over me? Do we have joinder? Yes or no? and money gets
exchanged boom its done

All we have to do is waive our entitlement, and if the court questions us, we question the
court by what authority do you have to compel me to accept an entitlement?

Gratuitously refuse this title, thank you very much for this lovely title, but I have too much
on my plate right now, I have too many titles already I cant accept any more titles! I already
have enough duties and responsibilities and you cant bind me to this new title. I wish to be
let alone

Dont answer a single question because any answer creates jurisdiction!!! If u bring to life
the second dimension by showing a coherent answer.they have jurisdiction!!

If they pull the strings and the puppet move then they have control.. so if they ask u a
question u answer with some weird response apples, bananas and blue is that some sort of
legalese your talking to me in? or are you talking to me man to man? the judge will never
sayyes to being a man so say to themso then this is off the record? Correct? the judge
may lie and sayno its on the record( but not a court of record) u reply with again i dont

313 | P a g e

understand legalese? And i am not joining your little group here and i am not required to
speak legalese and i will not entertain any question in legalese..so if u serve me a question
in legalese i refuse to answer?

If someone puts a plate of pasta before u and u start eating it ..well then your going to be
liable for it.. if a judge is serving u a order and you are going along with it guess what?
Youre liable!! Careful!! Because even answerinig what your name is can be dangerous!!
They want to answer to the name and come up to the front of the court and they are going
to assume they have jurisdiction over you you just have to remind them that they dont
have it by telling them in writing that u never surrender jurisdiction nor have i consent to
any title of defendant!
When they here that their hold on you disappear plus your early notice to the court will help
to!

So if it Cook County vs Tom well it Cook Countys case thenand if its their case u dont
have to try on the clothes or titles they cant obligate that on you!! Thank you but this
would cause me great harm and you would want to cause man harm would you? so if it
there case why would you want to be the defender of it!! Dont defend their case!! You cant
accept that title because ur to loaded with your other titles so there is no room for me to
take on their title and none can force me to

Notice the court of the title of idiot that have..own it as it means

Idiot is a word derived from the Greek , idits ("person lacking professional skill", "a
private citizen", "individual"), from , idios ("private", "one's own")

A judge cant be forced to talk so if you answer question with bananas orange
apples(nonsense) and the judge calls u an idiot u say hold on i comprehend that! yes yes i
am an idiot i am a private person! How do you have jurisdiction over a private person
again?

If the judge is asking u a whole lot of question..just say can u put your questions in the form
of writing and i also wish for leave of court for 30 days so i can put a proper answer before
this court as i need to seek competent counsil! this is important so make sure its in the
from of writing and remind the judge you are not here to argue with him; you are there to

314 | P a g e

argue with the prosecutor or attorney who stole my property!! My argument isnt with you
its with the prosecutor!!

- How to speak to BAR members, declaratory judgements, and the rules of your court

Lawyers are not taught common law so they will have no idea what it is you are doing!!
So you have to lead them down the education road and they will see the logic..u say
common law and they are going to run!!play stupid because u got logic on your side!!! They
wont understand how to deal with their opwn con job at that moment!!

Common law is just the custom of the people at the time

Does some get to face their accuser?

has anyone been harmed?
did i do wrong to you? And how did i do that harm? And when did u let me know about that
harm? Is there a a verifiable true bill that i could settle today? Didnt i try to give you an
opportunity to cure and provide a remedy for this situation?

Lawyerthis si a criminal act reply oh really so someone made a claim that he harmed
someone?
lawyerno reply then how do you feel you have jurisdiction ove r him?
who brought the guns and drugs into the public? The police ..until then they were safely
secure in his home

Declaratory judgements are just opinions and has no impact on any party..we dont want to
sue any body and u just want an opinion before we think about building up our cases here if
we have to litigate each other in a frivolous claim. Its just a learned opinion

315 | P a g e

Careful if you bring a false claim before the court! It could cost you dearly specially after a
public official!!

a judge has control of the building and everyone in ityou better in writing let the court no
well in advance of arriving of your status as a man and what your intention are..because he
is there to secure the building!!

Preliminary hearing or dispositional hearing or prescopy day. Before the trial ..

rules of the court dont need to be established unless the other side ask. The rules are
ancient they know how to behave!! The judge will say who goes first and who goes last
before the jury!! If lawyers start to talk you go wowowowowwdo you have any first hand
knowledge of the incedent? Then you know the rules!!! Shut it!! Can u bear witness? Then
shut up!!

Proof of appearance at the courthouse, and contempt charges

It is super important to make our appearance well noted, because they will put a warrant out
for our arrest for failing to appear. We go to the courthouse on a summons, they tell us no
ones there, we grab a guard or anyone to come with us to the courtroom as witness that we
appeared at the appointed time, then we put in a note with the court clerk and get her to
timestamp it, then we make copies of that note, file a copy to the case, keep one copy, and
send another copy to the judge.

The government has control over us IF WE BREACH THE PEACE when were in public space,
we cannot breach the peace.

We are a man until we do wrong, when we do wrong be incur a debt, a debtor has duties and
obligations, dong wrong makes us a person.

316 | P a g e

Give written fair warning of who we are, what we are, and what we want from that building
and what we expect when we walk into that building. When we get a citation/ticket, we
immediately write them a notice to let them know who theyre dealing with, DONT ambush
the court. Send fair notice, make claim, go to court as a man.

Judges are there to control the masses.

State your claim vs. present your claim

Dont state claim, just present it. Dont state anything in their court because they cant hear
us.
We present the claim to the bailiff, the judge, the prosecutor. Theyll postpone our trial once
we present our claim. Itll give us enough time to resolve our case. Once we finish the case
on our claim, the administrative court judge will probably just follow the judgement on our
case to save face.

Once were in someone elses case, they dont have to hear us talk if they dont want to. We
MUST present our claim!!!
Out of respect, we dont put things into other peoples cases. Were noticing the court that
theres a claim going on elsewhere.

Everytime we open our mouth, were making a new order. So keep our mouth shut!!!

Your file is your property!!!! Is someone denying u access to your property? You have been
requiring via letters and physical gone in to the court and they are blocking you form access
to your complete true and up to date file so that you know what u are walking into before
court just show them the unfairness of procecutors having access and not you.. would u let
the crown go in there? Well this is a public building? Or is this a private organization? And
arent u a public servant? Then serve me?
get them to say there is someone responsible for that paperwork at the buildingthey
better not say your stuff is not being kept safe by someone responsible!!

317 | P a g e

In common law, a right of audience is generally a right of a lawyer to appear and conduct
proceedings in court on behalf of their client.

No MP is a VIP because man is a higher title than MP, as they are just a public servant! In
service of man!!

Play dirty!! If they say they have a translator for your father u say he speaks a rare from of
Punjabi so only you two knowand they cant say crap.so u can be the translator for your
side..

U created an order in voice so here is your invoice

place a notice before the courtany place an order today there will be held liable

at queens bench only man speak so no there is no barrister john doeits just john doe so
keep the titles out of here except that of manthere are no offcies allowed at queens
bench!!! as man is only allowed to speak in that court!! There is no admiral there is no
general!!
does that mean that queens bench is different than filing a common law claim or is the
court become a queens bench court when there is a claim by a man before the court. Or is it
at a specific building? As in bc there is no queens bench? Is it Supreme Court of British
Columbia..if i asked the judge he should say it is queens bench?right?

if there is no plaintiff? And the court is not completethen they cant proceed because the
court was not properly assembled because there is a piece missing (the plaintiff must
appear).so is this how you go for a trial by jury so the judge isnt involved and he just say
we cant go forward until it the plaintiff appears..is this how you get your case discharged or
dismissed?

Someone says prince diana is suing you? Well i want to see her face to face in court to
believe this!!!
regina is suing me? U mean Elizabeth Windsor? Well she better appear!!!she serves at the

318 | P a g e

pleasure of the people and since bur one of the people it woyld please i a man for her to
show up!!!
Judges knows regina ? regina who? Therei sa million reginas which one? the crown is just the
bar association..he is playing stupid so u play stupid too.dont show understanding that its
the barjust call the trump card outu want to see the plaintiff or they cant proceed

Were are bringing a claim against wrongdoers

When someone says they dismissed our case, dont accept it, who is this magical they?
Who has control over this case? Read carefully whats being dismissed: if theyre dismissing
THEIR case, thats fine; they dont have jurisdiction to dismiss OUR case, only we can do that
because its under our jurisdiction and control.

Both America and Canada have federal courts; we dont deliver our case to the CANADIAN
federal court, we deliver our case to a public building, in which the federal rules, NOT
Federal Government. Its federal RULES, but were going to bring in our LAW.

We are not filing a civil right claim we do not have civil rights, we have the rights of man
given by God. A CITIZEN has civil rights. Its like an Australian coming to US saying you
violated my civil rights, he has no civil rights hes not a US citizen. We are not anything
other than a man, we have no titles and we accept no titles. Im a man making a claim
against another man.

People need to read their contracts and learn to modify them!!! Employeer give you a
contract u modify and send it back and make them not even see what they signed the
names too when he signs his contract and doesnt realize that if he tries to sue you that
the contract screws the company instead!!

319 | P a g e

What to charge for your claim, and tort of outrage

Tort of Outrage Law & Legal Definition
Tort of outrage is also called intentional infliction of emotional distress. In using this legal
claim, a plaintiff alleges suffering mental harm as a result of someone's intentional,
outrageous conduct. It involves conduct beyond the bounds of decency, which is considered
atrocious and completely intolerable in a civilized society. The plaintiff may recover damages
for extreme emotional distress even without physical damage. For example, some cases
involve mix-ups in the handling of a deceased person's final remains.
A dollar a second if someone kidnapped our kid. Capital crime.
Everything else be biblical, if an officer gives us a ticket of $80, we will charge him back for
$80. And hes paid the entire time hes in court, we shall also be paid when we appear in
court by going after the compensation through his bond, or settle it out of court in private,
cash; or if you dont want to do any of these things were going to presume non-cooperation
from you and go get a warrant in debt and start liquidating your assets to compensate us.

- Denied access to a trial by jury

When we require a trial by jury and are denied because its only available to broken
marriage proposals or something, then that person is literally saying theres a special class
of people who can have trial by jury? theres a prejudice against I the mans right to have
trial by jury? Its the same as getting on the bus and not having the same right as the other
man (who paid the same fair) to sit in the same seat? Are you saying he gets special
privileges that I dont get?

Sometimes its the public courthouse that wants to duel with us.
In that case were bringing our court to the courthouse; just like we are bringing our dance
into that dancehall.
Court is not courthouse, theyre not synonyms.
Our court will appear AT their courthouse, their building.

320 | P a g e

The legal society's dirty tricks

If we believe the judge is biased against us, we can ask him to recuse himself, because he
has conflict of interest from knowing/being in the same society as the prosecution against
us.
Make sure that we have our proper title of MAN throughout the paper process, if they keep
adding titles to us we put up a fine if anyone adds to my title of MAN it is considered
harassment and trespass, it is a burden on I the man, and the trespasser will be fined x
amount.

Make sure that when we do claims its simple and general trespass robbery etc.
We go into details in letters to the wrongdoer as exhibits wheres your verifiable proof of
claim that you have the right to forcibly carry off property? Your silence is tacit agreement
that you have no right to my property my kid.

If they start telling us about being a defendant, we just say whats that? Im just a man, I
dont know what a defendant is nor how to be one. I only know how to be a man.

A four question letter to the prosecutor if our case is getting wishy washy with
administrative titles and crap.
1. Am I a defendant? 2. Am I the plaintiff? 3. Is this your case? 4. Is this my case? Your
silence will mean you tacitly agree this case is in my jurisdiction and in my court attorneys
cant speak

If were not willing to take on the title of worlds greatest loser, then were not willing to
take on the title of defendant or plaintiff. If those titles start showing up in our
paperwork, we gotta object to it and fix it.

When we say stop it means stop..just because u have a licence doesnt give you the right to
do anything that harms a man.. a marriage license does give the wife the right to harm her
husband if he says stop!!

321 | P a g e

License doesnt give permission to harm man , when i say stop it mean now not in 2 min its
means now!! I dont care if you have me by my name or whatever u have to stop because
you are harming man!! If one doesnt stop after hearing the word stop ..ur are obscene and
evil!! Everybody knows what stop means!!

When the us government closed its doors for two weeks and nobody cared.. they quickly
opened it back up before we figured out we didnt need them for anything!!

Ruling changed back to discharge, from "in your favor"

If we got our case dismissed and we want it to be discharged, we just have to write a letter
to the judge saying thank you so much for your lovely ruling, its been a great thing for my
family etc. but there seems to be clerical error in the process and someone took your ruling
of discharge and misinterpreted it into dismissed. I wish to make sure that the ruling gets an
opportunity to cure, and get a ruling that says discharged sent to me. Thank you kindly.

defendant prevailed and in the defendants favour is not acceptable

Write a letter to the judge after the case was finished and say to the judge that your thankful
for everything that he has done and he has made society better but in your case was it was
written dismissed when u need it to be discharged because keeping it open causes me
stress and harm.. so if u could kindly make it be written as someone has misinterpreted (or
minimize)your words so that it reads and is amended to read discharged not dismissedthx
u.(be polite)
this is an opportunity to cure before you go after them again!!

i wish not to speak in court for fear of harm to my body; last time i was here i was found
contempt of court; since i cannot understand what is to loud or to soft ; i fear that i may find
myself in contempt of court and have harm come to my body; so to avoid that it is my wish
that all communication be in writing from here forward; he who acts on my behalf bears all
liability.

322 | P a g e

require leave of court for pen and ink so you can write it down..because it there court!! Not
yours!! Until you open up your case. But again shut your mouth and have tight paper
work!! Remember they attack you with a piece of paperu attack back in kind with the pen
and paper!!! Nobody is testifying on their side1! Why should you!!! Shut it is key as they are
only trying to draw you out!! Dont convict yourself with your beliefs!!! They wont convict
themselves under oath or affirmation!! So shut it!! It is ridiculous to convict yourself!!
you can easily get in contempt of court for simply asking is that an order? so put it in
writing!!

If someone like a lawyer says something ridiculous like do you believe this paperwork is
going to work for you or do any good? u respond with absolutely i believe it is going to
work; but is it going to work in your case, absolutely not, its an exercise in futility, you guys
will think its a joke!! but in my court when i open up my court with my own claim this paper
work is going to work like a charm! Because in my court its going to be exhibit A, because if
your court wont respect that common law is the highest law of the land not your silly
statutes, you are going to find out, you are going to get a learning, a nice little lesson, when
u step in my court

Charging for wasted time spent at the courthouse

Karl doesnt tolerate any wasting off timeif you find this is a problem then show up and the
schedule time say 830 am at court stand up and say i have been summoned here for an
830 appointment is there anybody here making a claim here or does anybody have any
business with me because i am ready to conduct business?is sound body here to do
commerce with me?
Repeat at 8:31AM repeat at 8:32AM do your final notice to the court and at the end say well
nobody is here to make a claim against my you will have to call me to make a new summons
for me to appear and there will be a bill for wasting my time!! Remember if youre late this
is what they do to you!! We are all equals here!!
Go get your notice time stamped by the clerk of the court and placed into their case
verifying you were there on time!
Hand the judge a bill for $100 an hour he is getting paid to be here so is the prosecutori
should be paid too
Maybe this will be a little reminder not to waste my timeif you have me schedule for 830 it
better be 830!
They want ur money u want respect!!
The nature of the case is the claim, the characteristic is the trespass, the definition of the
tresspass would be the interference of the right to be let alone or interference of the right to
move form point a to point b
Usually u want your claim in way before the trial date but you could show up and ask to
have your case to be seen as well i present my case to the court they may take it or they

323 | P a g e

may say sorry we need time (usually 21 days) to prepare for this..but they may just
greenlight you to get your case started at the same time..

Accept the charges, then require and order the immediate restoration of property

Accept the charges (u pay them 1 dollar a month is the best u can do) and that everything u
did is illegal, accept u were doing 50 in and 60, then u say i require and order the immediate
restoration of property now..and shut up!!

- It's a word game

Remember the 3 second rule when it comes to responding to the judge!

I judge is playing and tossing words around so if say i wish for this case to be dismissed!
and he comes back with that will be for another day you need to come back with If wish
for another day to be today
And he may come back with something else and you have to be ready with your wits.. or he
may come back and say okay i dismiss this case
It just a word game.. and they love these words and they have a 1000 years of tradition so
they arent going to roll over!!!

We will come in as a defendant in their case so long as they come in as defendants in our
case
We are guest in their case but they will be guest in our case and there we will prevail!!

324 | P a g e

Never use the word no

Say a judge tries to give you a compromising request..
I think thats lovely but wouldnt i lose my ability to move my case before Queens Bench?

Another reply to a tricky situation

can u please show me the benefit of appearing in your court if you are going to hold me in
contempt
So there is a lot of things one can do to handle a judge in an administrative court but its still
there domain so they may want you to exercise your full card with your own claim..

eliminate the NO from your language and try to conditionally accept and think of writing
a letter to a grama who has a lot of money she wants to leave you in her inheritanceits
such a lovely offer but can u show me why i would come down if all you are going to do is
put me in a cage for two days? Dont you think it wise and pertinent for me to meet you in a
more neutral environment?

Officers and lawyers can not appear at queens bench!!!

Accept all presentments and require fair and just compensation
Someone wants us to appear? Ok we require to be compensated for our time and trouble. In
this society, we gotta accept all presentments. If it would cause us great harm to be out
there, offer them to do it in our house.

If someone gives us a presentment that would cause us harm, be honest and reply thank
you for this gift but this would cause me great harm. And you wouldnt want to harm a man
would you?

325 | P a g e

Queens Bench
Anywhere small claims court is, we can make our regular claims in there.
Were going to have a claims court AT the county court.

Is it safe to say that a claims court IS queens bench? Or are they different things?
If I need to put in a claim against an officer for traffic court, is there a special place that I
need to file the claim to access queens bench? Will that simple small claims court suffice? Or
will I have to go to a placed CALLED Queens Bench? because BC and ON dont have
queens bench.

Small claims court are going to accept your claim..that is queen bench!!
A lot of hippies dont believe in private property. When people put vested interest in a piece
of land or thing, that becomes property. They should have right to secure and protect their
sweat equity against trespass. We are open to sharing, as long as the guest also put in their
sweat equity in order to join and enjoy this property.

Originals, and copies of your paperwork

I write the letter by hand, (claim). Make copy of my hand written claim, take both to
courthouse, get both file stamped; then go up to the people we owe money to, make our
best offer, if they refuse, we give them one of the copies with the stamp, they have now
been served.

Common law, just looks for a logical process, there are no rules in common law. When we
present to jury make sure they understand the logic behind our actions, we are fine.

A judge doesnt talk about the law, he only interprets the facts to adhere to the law.
A jury can CHANGE the law.

326 | P a g e

If a judge starts talking about process blah blah.

We say I dont know what youre talking about, Ive never heard of such a thing, am I
required to know about such a thing? Is that something YOU have to abide by? Hmm judge
person? What about I a man? Im a simple man abide by logic. I abide by unwritten rules, I
just changed one inside me right now, and Ill change it again in the future.

Sneak their official form into you claim as one of your exhibits blank
And when the clerk say it needs to be filled out you point to the sign on the desk that says
you cant give legal advice and ask are u giving me legal advice? Should poop a pickle!! If
the clerk was right then the judge will throw it out when he sees it and the courts just ate my
money..so i will take that chance!! File on demand if you have to

In the event a Sonoma County clerk determines that a document should not be filed for any
reason, he/she shall advise the person attempting to file the document of that reason. If the
proffered document is a pleading prepared by a party, the attorney of record or person
proceeding in propria persona attempting to file the document may then request the
document be filed on demand, in which case the document shall be accepted for filing and
will be stamped Filed on Demand. This policy does not apply to documents which a party
requests the Clerk to issue (e.g. Writs, Summons, Abstracts); in such circumstances, the
Clerk will require compliance with applicable statutes.

Judge ask u if your name is john doe

You say pardon me? I cant understand
He asks again
U again still cant understand looking puzzled
Could you write the name down?

327 | P a g e

The judge writes the name down( it will be in all caps)

U say I'm not the author of that name

Bring the law into the court, Queens Bench, and being placed in a dock

I need to see the enrolled law brought in and they will have to unroll the law and read into
the court... and then you are going to ask where are you expressly written into it.and show
me where i am bound and where i am a signatory ..or show me where my representative
signed on my behalf.. or show me where i am defined in that law..because i believe ur in
error!!

Bring ur case at queen bench not inwatch out for queen bench division..not the same

Queens bench is hidden so its gonna take some searching around..

U want ot placed in the dock because that is where man needs to go to be protected from
the retorique. The place and surround u with a curtain and they talk about your person so be
happyin Canada its a partial dock it doesnt go all the way to the ceiling..

- Objecting in statutory court creates joinder

Objecting in statutory is like saying u understand enough to reject the idea!! Require leave
of court and file a claim. You cant react to the other side you cant show any level of
understanding..put on your idiot hat!!!

Changing your complaint in to a claim

328 | P a g e

Let your complaint die..dismiss it and let it sit there forever and die of natural cause and file
a claim..

12b6 is when the other side answer you! If the other side hasnt answered u then all he has
is a case number so let it die..

Now if they havent yet..just go to the clerk with your case number and tell them that
nobody has answered yet to you and you want to amend the claim y striking everything off
the case number and placing your claim in it. Lucky

But if they have already answered you have to beg them to amend it gulp!!

- CROWN still pursuing after Queen's bench win, and fee schedules

The judge knows that if u win in queens bench u simply remind them that common law
court decision are superior courts and that if they continue they are harming a man!! Simple
warning to drop their case!! Dont threaten!!
Dont use kidnapping
Use some one do me wrong and i want fair and just compensation

Be JURY reasonable would a jury award u that much? Ultimately this could be in front of
the jury! Be a good man..not an opportunistic man!

1.

Opportunistic adjective
exploiting immediate opportunities, especially regardless of planning or principle.

329 | P a g e

"an opportunistic political lightweight"

ECOLOGY
(of a plant or animal) able to spread quickly in a previously unexploited habitat.
"opportunistic populations colonizing new substrates"
o
MEDICINE
(of a microorganism or an infection caused by it) affecting patients only or chiefly when the
immune system is depressed.
o

If a cop u gives a ticket for $50 make your fee $50 in your claim.. the judge should laugh and
maybe we can change the system
The right to queens bench is for the people as well as to the King [Queen].
Tomlin's Law Dictionary 1811 Vol 2 of 6 Page 139
Every Court of record is the king's Court, in right of his crown and dignity, though his
subjects have the benefit of it ; and therefore no other court loath. authority to fine and
imprison ; so that the very erection of a new jurisdiction, with power of fine or
imprisonment, :sakes it instantly a Court of record, The free use of all courts of record and
not of record, is to be granted to the people : The legit and town are the king's Courts,
and of record.
Remember dont reduce your status to that of a pauper this is by right!!

In and at court in regards to your claim

If you place your claim IN the court u just surrendered jurisdiction to them
If its AT your in control and can require a jury..and nobody is to open that case or view that
case or interpret that case until u get to try it on before a trial jury or the man in the black
robe..

If you are in this scenario u require leave of court to amend your claim but you may be
denied

Change the claim from IN black it out and put AT

Remember its a trial!! They are here to test you!!

330 | P a g e

How to run your claim at the same time as their complaint

When were making the claim and theres an existing case going on on the administrative
side, say can we merge the two cases to save the courts limited resources. That way the
public doesnt have to be burdened to hear two cases.

Getting your claim into court, and dismissing your previous case
Writing vague claims is like getting a prepaid stamped envelope from the post office.
So now all we got to do is deliver it to the other side. Dont get fancy with exhibits, just put
the 2 sentence 1 page claim in there, dont raise any red flags in the system. Get a case
number, the stamp from the court clerk. NOW go home and put in the exhibits and whatever
else we may need (just photos of the kids, not even the names). And then serve it.
If you served a complaint instead of a claim, or a bad claim and you want to modify it, you
gotta BEG the other side to change it now because they got all dressed up for something
that you dont even want to prosecute anymore.
If you want to dismiss your complaint, find the rule in their court that says you can dismiss
your own complaint.
ONLY if you filed a COMPLAINT, dont go around dismissing your CLAIMS people.
Dismissing the case will suspend it, and if you never re-open it then itll just die off.
Dealing with jurisdiction in court
sir, before we proceed, may I address the crown or may you present to the crown, let me
give you a piece of paper in writing. (written: I will appear and I will answer when you show
you have jurisdiction: how does you the crown have jurisdiction over I the man?)
Judge will ask prosecutor: do you care to answer this?
Prosecutor will say: I need 30 days to submit a proper answer to the court.
Judge asks us: does that satisfy you?
Us: sure. Giveem 30 days.

A final judgement from the court is required before jail time

331 | P a g e

If we didnt get an order in writing, and the judge just verbally tell us to go to jail. When we
file for an appeal, we have to have the casefile, the transcript, the FINAL ORDER, and then
we submit our initial brief. The appeal court cant make a ruling if one of those 4 elements
are missing.

Calling the Queen to the bench

When they are pitting u in some case Regina vs the man ask the question is this the same
regina as in Elizabeth mary alexander born the 21st of april 1926?
samplehello jim, thank u for all your recent exhibits and disclosure regarding the trespass
robbery that occurred at my home. This is a further benefit to helping i claim against Regina
or majesty the Queen. We had forgotten how much you had stolen and again appreciate
your efforts in bringing it to our attention. You do know that i am a man and have the right to
require of you to bring your complaint before Queens Bench and before a trial by jury in a
court of record. This is a common law land where a man makes the law the rules of the
court. The rules of the court is i get to cross examine my accuser and i know u will be sure to
have Regina present on March,xx,xxxx so i can exercise said right to see what man or
woman i have done wrong

Make sure everyone gets a copy

Now if you want to file this in their administrative court you find a way to use one of their
forms to attach it toso you tell her u wil pay $1 for every form they got because ur trying
to find out which one u can use to attach your complete letter so they get it in the file so
everybody knows.. after that request the clerk may surprise u and hand u the affidavit letter
or something along those lines..hint hint

Avoid anything that embeds your file u want to attach it

332 | P a g e

Note: dont describe the titles of the man in the claim, itll only complicate the case.
Failure to perform, and making a claim for equity

Gentleman loses case and house because attorney/lawyer fails to show up at hearing.
Make a claim I a man (name) claim wrong by the acts of David Wright; I tendered David
Wright $2000 to perform a service; by David Wrights failure to perform that service I have
accrued a financial loss; I claim compensation of the damage (value of house lost)

Were not going to mention that hes an attorney, were not going to call it malpractice,
because the clerk will do their best to slip this in and slow down the process.
We definitely want a trial by jury, not a trial by judge, because judges will want to protect
lawyers. Judge may even find in favour of lawyer.

How do we go after a judge if this is such a buddy system? Wont other judges protect this
judge?

Whoever moves the court (the claimant) must set the rules in the beginning, and it cannot
be changed in that court during this case. We dont care about precedence, these are the
rules that were going to follow here in my court.

When we are in an administrative court, we file our own claim to take over as a superior
court, set up our own rules. Then the judge is going to look at the contract and see whats
expressedly written between I and the other party; he will take into consideration who wrote
the contract, whos liable, who signed it etc. was there any fraud in factum or fraud in
inducement? The judge is going to figure out whos screwing over whom, and if we dont like
his interpretation of the law (contract), call in a jury. Say hey I dont trust your judgement

333 | P a g e

bob, I think youre in collusion with the other party who wrote this contract. I want a jury.
Judge says fine, want a jury to interpret this? Fine! I want to jury to interpret the fact, and
Ill interpret the law we say no the jury can do both, the contract is the law. Does this
contract exist? Is my signature on there? if Im not party to the contract then its an
unconscionable contract, how can I be held liable for it?
is this a conscionable contract? Yes or no?

Unconscionability (known as unconscionable dealing/conduct in Australia) is a doctrine in

contract law that describes terms that are so extremely unjust, or overwhelmingly one-sided
in favor of the party who has the superior bargaining power, that they are contrary to good
conscience.

Jury of your peers

When theres a ridiculous law interfering with our right, we demand a jury of our peers.
Because the customs practices policies and beliefs of the people that are indigenous to that
district demands that the law gets ignored back from Washington, that we have to live like
because this is whats necessary and proper for our own survival. And thats how we bypass
the federal court.

A void judgement vs the judgement is void

Say its a void judgement, a judgement that has never existed.
Dont say judgement IS VOID, because when we say the judgement IS we acknowledge
the existence of the judgement!!! Dont do that!!!
It never couldve existed based upon the way it was allegedly created, because an attorney
brought it to life, and an attorney cant do that.
From the date that it was created, theres been a void judgement controlling this case,
theres been a void judgement interfering with my rights, its interfering with my property.

Statutory grand juries are 23 not 25. Common law is supposed to be 25.

334 | P a g e

So anytime we get arrested for a felony, first thing to do is to demand to be indicted. Get an
indictment from the grand jury. So now we want to present our story, our side to the grand
jury. Prosecutors not going to allow you to address the grand jury, but I Say I have the right
to present the evidence, all the evidence, not just the prosecutors evidence, MY evidence as
well. And if they wont allow us to do it, WE can actually hand down an indictment, a
complaint or a claim to the grand jury. And if the feds are coming after us, we could go after
the feds, and tell the grand jury to investigate the feds. And then accept all OUR evidence
and then theyre going to investigate OUR claim against the feds. Because the grand jury is
an independent organization.

Say we put twelve balloons in the air, and they charge us with 12 felonies, put this infront of
a grand jury, theyre going to laugh. Misdemeanor felony? Put it infront of a grand jury!
Theyre all ridiculous charges. Im not answering to any of this nonsense.
Rule 57. Declaratory Judgment
These rules govern the procedure for obtaining a declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C.
2201. Rules 38 and 39 govern a demand for a jury trial. The existence of another adequate
remedy does not preclude a declaratory judgment that is otherwise appropriate. The court
may order a speedy hearing of a declaratory-judgment action.
Notes
(As amended Dec. 29, 1948, eff. Oct. 20, 1949; Apr. 30, 2007, eff. Dec. 1, 2007.)
Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules1937
The fact that a declaratory judgment may be granted whether or not further relief is or
could be prayed indicates that declaratory relief is alternative or cumulative and not
exclusive or extraordinary. A declaratory judgment is appropriate when it will terminate the
controversy giving rise to the proceeding. Inasmuch as it often involves only an issue of law
on undisputed or relatively undisputed facts, it operates frequently as a summary
proceeding, justifying docketing the case for early hearing as on a motion, as provided for in
California (Code Civ.Proc. (Deering, 1937) 1062a), Michigan (3 Comp.Laws (1929) 13904),
and Kentucky (Codes (Carroll, 1932) Civ.Pract. 639a3).
The controversy must necessarily be of a justiciable nature, thus excluding an advisory
decree upon a hypothetical state of facts. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 297
U.S. 288, 325, 56 S.Ct. 466, 473, 80 L.Ed. 688, 699 (1936). The existence or nonexistence of
any right, duty, power, liability, privilege, disability, or immunity or of any fact upon which
such legal relations depend, or of a status, may be declared. The petitioner must have a
practical interest in the declaration sought and all parties having an interest therein or
adversely affected must be made parties or be cited. A declaration may not be rendered if a
special statutory proceeding has been provided for the adjudication of some special type of
case, but general ordinary or extraordinary legal remedies, whether regulated by statute or
not, are not deemed special statutory proceedings.
When declaratory relief will not be effective in settling the controversy, the court may
decline to grant it. But the fact that another remedy would be equally effective affords no
ground for declining declaratory relief. The demand for relief shall state with precision the

335 | P a g e

declaratory judgment desired, to which may be joined a demand for coercive relief,
cumulatively or in the alternative; but when coercive relief only is sought but is deemed
ungrantable or inappropriate, the court may sua sponte, if it serves a useful purpose, grant
instead a declaration of rights. Hasselbring v. Koepke, 263 Mich. 466, 248 N.W. 869, 93 A.L.R.
1170 (1933). Written instruments, including ordinances and statutes, may be construed
before or after breach at the petition of a properly interested party, process being served on
the private parties or public officials interested. In other respects the Uniform Declaratory
Judgment Act affords a guide to the scope and function of the Federal act. Compare Aetna
Life Insurance Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227, 57 S.Ct. 461 (1937); Nashville, Chattanooga &
St. Louis Ry. v. Wallace, 288 U.S. 249 (1933); Gully, Tax Collector v. Interstate Natural Gas
Co., 82 F.(2d) 145 (C.C.A.5th, 1936); Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. Plummer, 13 F.Supp. 169
(S.D.Tex., 1935); Borchard, Declaratory Judgments (1934), passim.
Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules1948 Amendment
The amendment substitutes the present statutory reference.
Committee Notes on Rules2007 Amendment
The language of Rule 57 has been amended as part of the general restyling of the Civil Rules
to make them more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent
throughout the rules. These changes are intended to be stylistic only.
Ask the man in the black robe is it not true that man only has to answer to claims?then
what r we doing here? im not here to be part of this administrative hearing as i am not
competent to speak, none can force me to understand either
u think i should get a code decipher, no thank u i dont trust than one bit as they have
swear an oath to up hold the rules of the court and the codes and statutes first before the
client. Unlike common law which it is the first rule to protect the client
There is no contract between me and the other side
judge will say is this true?
they will reply no sir
judge should say outraged
u say if there is no contract court then there is no law before the courtthey are filing a
false claimfrivolous
Simple claim
1. i (your name) claim the wrongdoers trespass against my property. See exhibit a
2. there is no law that exist which binds i to the wrongdoer.
3. i require the delivery of all said property to be under my jurisdiction, no later than april 18
xxxx
4. i will place a charge of $1000 per day per said trespasser and said agency for any failure
in the restoration on said date
5. if the placement of said property does occurs on our before april 18 xxxxx i will forgive
those who trespass of their debt as i would wish of others to forgive me of my debts and
trespasses..
165 - Handling a traffic citation
There are like 28 different types of law..which one are u moving under?
Dont ask the judge what law ur moving under u ask the prosecutor
So ask for a bill of particularsand one thing u need to know is what law is this? What law
are u relying on?
You stay the matter in court until they show you the law.. they cant force u to be competent
when ur not ready..

336 | P a g e

So when they hand u a ticket for $100 that is prima facie evidence
1. Prima facie evidence is a legal term used to mean that you have enough evidence to
prove something by pointing to some basic facts, but that your proof can be refuted.
So not only is it worth $100 but also my time my resources my energy not only am i going to
claim all the equity in that citation i am going to ask for damages for wasting my time and
all that jazz166 - Understanding debts, and a summons to appear

Know what to say and do before going in to court

Stick to the script of the claim, and practice being in front of the judge. Writing is 1, acting is
2. If ya dont know what to do/say, keep yer mouth shut and stick to the paperwork.

The court refuses your claim, enforcement of judgements, and maxims of law
Letter: As far as I know this is a public building, and everybody has a right to access this
public building. And I believe there is a court clerk assigned to this building and the court
clerk is to accept all filings. And I expect the court clerk to carry out their duties and
obligations to perform their job in which theyve been assigned.
Send this as certified mail, no need to send as registered. Get a green card proves that its
been sent.

summons means someones granting us the power to drag someone off the street into
court. The only other way we can have that power is if theyre on our feet (imminent
danger).

If I filed my claim in a common law court of record, and I ask for a trial by jury, (for traffic),
can I during preliminary hearings before the trial, establish with the magistrate that there is
no injured party? Can a case be dismissed at that point? Can they actually proceed to trial
by jury even without the plaintiff appearing?

337 | P a g e

Verdict is witnessed by the judge/magistrate, and signs it. and then the court clerk signs it
and seals it. Then the county sherriffs office and get a writ of attachment. Tell the sheriff
what we want him to seize. Once we get a judgement then we can get a writ of attachment.
Maxims do not apply across the board uniformly, they are to be used in context of situation.
i.e. he who hesitates loses vs look before you leap.

It has to be expressly written into the contract or codes or rulesor forget it

Isnt that ur signature on that drivers license ..did u see me sign that? and there is no youre
there is only i!!

A judge doesnt allow any word mistakes but a jury will let words slide as they dont know
generally speaking

Ideally stay on your one sentence and dont deviate form it they are seeking wiggle room
by one word.. keep it simple and ride the paper work and shut your mouth
Dont explain yourself anymore

Make sure they drag the defendant to court so that it was by way of oath and affirmation
where it was witness by a magistrate or else the default judgement can come back and
haunt you years from nowtheir childrens children can pick up the claim because there is
no statutes of limitation in common law..

Behaving like a lawyer using case law, evidence and facts are used to get permissionas a
man u want to face a man and that will kill most cases that are brought by government.. so
the key is not to act like a lawyer because they operate from a position of weakness..BE A
MAN!!

File a claim

338 | P a g e

Serve it
Order judge to hold off proceeding of the inferior court until superior court has rendered it
decision
then send him your rules of court
then u go to court and ask is there a proper verifiable true claim before the court?
they will say yes
then u ask where is the man or woman that i have done harm?
they will reply he/she is not here but their lawyer is
then you tell the lawyer to not say anything as its rule number 2 lawyers cant say anything
unless they first hand knowledge
then turn to the magistrate and say i came here to see a valid claim before this court..and i
have yet to see onethe lawyer is here and he doesnt have first hand knowledge and the
man that say i do wrong is not here i order that this case to be discharged immediately
without prejudice if u want to leave it open and stay in honor go for a dismissal of the case
with prejudice..so that they can stay proceeding for sometimes up to 7 years or whatever it
is in the area you live and then i want the case closed and all equity in the claim and it
should be given to us.. burn it or stick it on your mantle.

You may find yourself having done everything correctly and theyre still ignoring you this is
when you bring the OR ELSE!!!

You write a nice little notice to the magistrate..if you try to take this any further you are
going to be personally liable for acting outside the capacity of your office and i am going to
sue you and hold you directly liable and its going to cost you $xxxxxxxx

If they continue and rule against you u make a claim the man who is magistrate and also
include the initial claim at that time too

Or

Is there a verifiable true claim before the court?

now all these charges that u burden me with by placing them on me, i am now going
establish what this burden was? I say it was $500 a day for placing that burden on me.. now
i am going to discharge it on you for making a false claim.

339 | P a g e

u charge your credit card the charges are financial burdens!!

If you ask everyone one of the people do you believe i broke the law? and they all answer
yes they are now evoking the common law because only a man can make a claim or have a
belief..and when u ask to see that claim and they cant produce itu have them all under
oath or affirmation making a false claim. Everyone is liable for committing perjury!!

Ignorance of the law is no excuse, if he orders another man to do something he has to pay
the bill
They assumed it!! Not presumed it but none of this applies unless u first establish that u
are a man in that court and have filed a proper claim in a superior court of record and
common law!!

Back off from their frivolous claim or their will be a demand for compensation

Keep ur claim short and sweet dont explain the situation as the correspondence between
the two of you will be evidence it they wont be playing stupid.remember include the
correspondence as exibit a, b,c and so on..

If they want a bill of particulars then u may give it or u may just say u know and i know what
u did, i will see u in court in front of the jury..

Every court is a court of record, traffic, probate, maritime, admiralty, natural, absolute etc.
We must say IN this court of record AT common law. Or law; common

Laws are just customs and practices of the people, when we go to traffic court, were in
their customs. When we file a claim, we are bringing our own law our own customs.

340 | P a g e

We must expressely say we are in common law.

I believe that Im in a court of record and its my belief that it operates under common law,
see exhibit A [blacks law]

Say u have an administrative court in session like a ticket at court tell them your court ie
mitchell court has just been made aware that it is being challenged and require leave of
court for 30 days so as to file my own claim in a court of record so as to properly heard
before the court about the matter.
after u filed you claim and served whomever ask the court to join the cases the superior and
inferior courts and suspend the inferior court until the superior court has rendered its
decision?

Every man has a property in his own person. This nobody has a right to, but himself. John
Locke
Does anyone else has right to that property is what it boils down to!!
None is going to more for your child than you..period.. so u dont need the help!!

So after you filed your claim and have your court

Send a notice tell them the robin court will be holding a preliminary hearing for the return of
the property; if there are any claims that come forward the trial by jury date will be set one
week from nowand if none comes forward this man in the black robe before us or a
representative of this venue or whomever the clerk assigns to sit before us; they will serve
as witness that if nobody comes forward that they are to take my order for the property of 1
2 3 4 also known as children are to returned to its original place of origin and proper
jurisdiction by 1am

341 | P a g e

you take that order stamped and signed and take it to the sheriff and u say help me regain
my property please

- You choose when to move your case, and the state will try every dirty trick

When one has established themselves IN their own common law court at queen bench
with you own claimie. the robin court. It means ur are the queen moving her court at her
wishes.. so if you need to postpone events feel free and take no guff about how the court
wont be pleased as its is not their court its your court and robin gets to say who is pleased
and who isnt pleased.

You reply thank you we will take that under royal advisement (whatever they say ) under
consideration and the court is not amused with its need to change property to child because
when i say something is mine ITS MINE i am the royal before the court which means you are
not confused y there misdirection bs and will send a real strong message that they are in
front of royalty but if you change your story then you ARE NOT THE ROYAL BUT AN
IMPOSTER

Note: when u appear at court in your court it makes the public officials stand on edge as you
are like the queen herself showing up so dont be surprised when the top dog shows up
talk to them (their best judge) but the rest of the lawyers and the judges are freaking out
because they are wondering how did the queen get out of her tower in London..she is here
but we would like to get her back to the tower in London.they want to gently back her up
the stairs into the tower and shut her there but we dont want to piss her off because she
might be the queen with a little amniesia.. but if they move you to the wrong side of the
court they will eat u alivedont play ball with the devil NO BARGAINS!!

Consent decree: A consent decree is an agreement or settlement to resolve a dispute

between two parties without admission of guilt (in a criminal case) or liability (in a civil case)
and most often refers to such a type of settlement in the United States.

Do not go for the consent decree!!

342 | P a g e

Provost Marshall and how to use them to get in and out of a state??

A license doesn't negate a trial by jury, and stick to what you say in court
Priviliges dont negate rightsjust because i have a marriage (privilege) contract doesnt
mean i have lost the right to a trial by jury in this matter of controversy (whatever it may be)

There are many layers to marriage..there is the common law side , the church side, civil
layer of marriage. A judge may only be addressing the civil side of the matter until you
evoke the common law!!

After you filed your claim as a prosecutor say i robin and my case are now at court. I now
present i and my case to court(dont forget this presentment) dont take judges offer for a
free lawyer just repeat yourself!!
By doing this one is showing it is etched in stone..one is making their bond ..ones giving
their word not one word is being taken away and not one word is added(bible)

U may have to do this a thousand times!! In biblical times if u changed your word you were
killed!!
Sometime u have a bond just for the case , just in case there is a false claim before the
court..

OJ Simpson could have asked for a bond of $15million dollars be put up just in case this is a
false claim ( as his verdict would have shown) and he would have been able to recoup his
losses..

Opening a common law court by writing a letter

Wheres your legal bases?

343 | P a g e

we apologize for any confusion, as the aggrieved, our lawful basis is that we require the use
of this venue as a court of record to seat a jury in which we move our claim before, also to
determine and render a verdict as to who has the lawful right to tender the order to
administrate our property?

Priviliges dont negate rightsjust because i have a marriage (privilege) contract doesnt
mean i have lost the right to a trial by jury in this matter of controversy (whatever it may be)

There are many layers to marriage..there is the common law side , the church side, civil
layer of marriage. A judge may only be addressing the civil side of the matter until you
evoke the common law!!

After you filed your claim as a prosecutor say i robin and my case are now at court. I now
present i and my case to court(dont forget this presentment) dont take judges offer for a
free lawyer just repeat yourself!!
By doing this one is showing it is etched in stone..one is making their bond ..ones giving
their word not one word is being taken away and not one word is added(bible)

U may have to do this a thousand times!! In biblical times if u changed your word you were
killed!!
Sometime u have a bond just for the case , just in case there is a false claim before the
court..

OJ Simpson could have asked for a bond of $15million dollars be put up just in case this is a
false claim ( as his verdict would have shown) and he would have been able to recoup his
losses..

The one bringing the controversy into the court will lose

344 | P a g e

If at the time u cant afford to pay any more than say $30 on a $50 monthly/payment and
they credit card company or whomever it is they have brought controversy and the moment
they bring it in to a court room they are going to lose..they should have accepted the best
they can do..

If any man believes they have a claim on my property, let them come forward with their
claim now or forever hold their peace.

Try to get our claim under one sentence.

Avoid jury trial, go for trial by jury

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the
right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
[2]

JURY TRIAL
A jury trial or trial by jury is a legal proceeding in which a jury either makes a decision or
makes findings of fact, which then direct the actions of a judge. It is distinguished from a
bench trial, in which a judge or panel of judges make all decisions.
Jury trials are used in a significant share of serious criminal cases in almost all common
law legal systems,[1] and juries or lay judges have been incorporated into the legal systems
of many civil law countries for criminal cases. Only the United States and Canada make
routine use of jury trials in a wide variety of non-criminal cases. Other common law legal
jurisdictions use jury trials only in a very select class of cases that make up a tiny share of
the overall civil docket (e.g. defamation suits in England and Wales), while true civil jury
trials are almost entirely absent elsewhere in the world. Some civil law jurisdictions do,
however, have arbitration panels where non-legally trained members decide cases in select
subject-matter areas relevant to the arbitration panel members' areas of expertise.
The availability of a trial by jury in American jurisdictions varies. Because the United
States system separated from that of the English at the time of the American Revolution, the
types of proceedings that use juries depends on whether such cases were tried by jury under
English common law at that time, rather than the methods used in English or UK courts in
the present. For example, at the time English "courts of law" tried cases of torts or private
law for monetary damages but "courts of equity" tried civil cases seeking an injunction or
another form of non-monetary relief. As a result, this practice continues in American civil

345 | P a g e

laws, even though in modern English law only criminal proceedings and some inquests are
likely to be heard by a jury.
Counter-claim puts us back into their system as defendant, always only file claims.
Never be a plaintiff, never accept the title of plaintiff, only be a man, wronged, aggrieved
party. Plaintiff puts us under the administrative jurisdiction.
Never be pro se, pro se means you agree to adhere to all their federal court rules and
regulations
If they file paper work with us under these unwanted titles, we file paperwork objecting to
that title, to cease and desist as we find it offensive and harmful to I a man and my person.
We bring that statutory case over to the common law court and keep it there and we are
going to resist every temptation every bribe and every threat from everybody in the system
will continue to insist on, and if they do, we are going to offer them to pay the man a lot of
money in compensation if they continue with that game.
cease and desist OR ELSE

Chief magistrate is the highest officer in the courthouse holding the bond for the entire
building and its operations and everyone hired there; and the court clerk is the highest of
the clerks of the courthouse; both these people must be informed before we put in any
claims into the public. Because they are there to protect us and we must exhaust all private
avenues before we can bring the matter into open court.

hey BOB, aka chief magistrate, If you do not control, train, monitor, and discipline your
subordinates, Im going to have to add you to my suit

Holding the officer, attorney, and judge liable for making a false claim against you
Dont say we didnt break the code. Just say we have no contract with the state, hence there
is no broken contract when we disobey the code.
Common law must only demonstrate one thing: harmed or injured party or breeched
contract. There is no code or statute in common law.

346 | P a g e

hey Bob (judge), Do you know the difference between legal and lawful? You do? Then
dismiss the jury because I dont need one. If youre competent in law, Ill take your word on
it. I never sat down, Im still standing in common law. And I never relinquished control this
court to anybody, and if you believe I did, Ill appeal it, and Ill be back in 30 days. Or you
can let me present the law to the court. Case dismissed? No discharged! Dismissed means
you can bundle it up and use it as a securitized instrument to collect and trade on the open
market, to help benefit the county and generate funds, thats fine but no one better drag me
back into this court again ever, under that ticket under that claim.

judge BOB do you believe that I broke the law? Lawyer/prosecutor BOB, do you believe? ok
now we just unshielded these men from their persons, they are now liable as men holding
beliefs that we broke the law.

Dont let a judge/officer presume that we are citizen/resident. are you going to testify under
oath/affirmation in open court that Im a citizen and resident?

A judge will never be able to verify that I am a resident or that Im in the capacity of a
citizen.

If we actually owe a debt, and we leave the court losing, then to stay honorable we must try
to settle with the man we owe a debt to, with a payment plan of our own.

When judges/lawyers/attorneys try to play word games and try to move our claim into
inferior courts:
He uttered a forged instrument which has interfered with my right to property

Common law court scenario:

Judge: what are you here about?

347 | P a g e

Us: (restate our claim as we have written in the filed claim, verify exactly word-for-word what
was on our claim)
Otherside: legalese blah blah blah
Us: He uttered a forged instrument which has interfered with my right to property
Otherside: we didnt utter a forged instrument
Judge to all of us: would you like to stand on your positions?
Us: this is my claim, its my law before the court, the courts to determine whether my laws
good law; not anybody elses law, you cant bring that code nonsense in here, thats not
whats before the court at this time, not his interpretation, this is what I say the law is. He
interfered with my right under this law. All he has to say is did he or did he not trespass
against I a man.

(On my claims front cover is: Trespass: forgery Verified claim.

That man created a false document i.e. ticket, that led to I a mans harm.
At the beginning of the doc: I verify all here to be true. At the bottom of the doc: verifiable
claim.)
Certification is a way to skirting liability, its lawyer trick. Certified means no liability. Verified
means liability. We want liability.

Attorneys are not competent to testify. We are incompetent in administrative court. When
they send us for a psychological evaluation, the ironic thing is that the very psychologists
they send us to will not be able to determine our legal competency that the court is looking
for. Its a baseless request.
What are you trying to ascertain with this competency evaluation? If its my legal
competency, how can a psychologist who has no legal training make this determination?
What law say I a man must be legally competent?

sorry for any inconvenience, but Im incompetent to engage in any intercourse in

commerce with you folks. Im just not competent to enter into such a foreign agreement. I
dont even know who created this code statute stuff, I dont understand it, I dont
comprehend it, Im not party to it. I cannot accept this wonderful benefit of this gift at this
time, because its going to cause me harm. (not understanding it, not comprehending it,
protects us from being held under their codes)

348 | P a g e

government was created by man and is supposed to be of benefit to man, and not cause
man harm. Thank you for your gift, and I accepted it at the time believing that it would be of
benefit, but now I realize its causing me harm. So please kind person on the other end of
this letter, kindly take back your gift

Customs > laws > rules

Customs will always win (jury)
Laws are of man
Rules are of persons, and are made to be broken.

Comprehend
COMPREHEND, verb transitive Literally, to take in; to take with, or together.
1. To contain; to include; to comprise.
The empire of Great Britain comprehends England, Scotland and Ireland, with their
dependencies.
2. To imply; to contain or include by implication or construction.
If there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, thou shalt
love thy neighbor as thyself. Romans 13:9.
3. To understand; to conceive; that is, to take, hold or contain in the mind; to possess or to
have in idea; according to the popular phrase, I take your meaning.
God doeth great things, which we cannot comprehend Job 37:5.
It is not always safe to disbelieve a proposition or statement, because we do
not comprehend it.

I require only verifiable claims, not certifiable, because if no mans going to appear dont
waste my time.

Certification is useful in postal stamps, because they can now verify that our document
exists and was sent out/delivered on this date.

349 | P a g e

Claim must be simple and clean to be in common law. Dont get fancy with the codes and
statutes nonsense.

When were in administrative court, its a hearing not a trial. And in a hearing, the guy in a
black dress is a hearing officer, not a judge.
Do not invoke habeas corpus, just order for property to be returned to the proper
jurisdiction.

- Understanding habeus corpus, jurisdiction, and holding a hearing officer liable

It basically means bring the body forwardthe equity and common law courts were fighting
over which court the body belongs in
So they got tired of moving around the body and merged the courtsso now all u have to do
is move your claim to the right side..
Again jurisdiction has control of that property or the man

Jurisdiction is who has control of that property.

i.e. structure for return of property: I claim that property is in the improper jurisdiction; that
property belongs in this jurisdiction at (insert our address)
whenever we put in an order
hey man in black robe, hearing officer of the inferior administrative court, if you deny my
change of jurisdiction over this property, Im going to require your findings of facts and
conclusions of law (fof, col). And I demand this property to be returned to this proper
jurisdiction (address). But if you say this is denied, which you have no standing and no right
to deny, if you believe you do, Bob Jones, hearing officer over this matter. I believe youre
the magistrate over this matter.
(Dont say were going to hold him liable right now, it will sound like a threat and extortion.
Be polite)

350 | P a g e

If one claim stands unrebutted it stands as true!!

- Working with the court to get what you require

If they insist on using their forms or use all capitals. Just say that u will do this becauseso
fill it out and put this note on it
i a man am using this form for the courts clerk ease of filing purposes only; this does not
negate the claim or any documents evidence or affidavits or orders or rights or testimony
attached within this or anything else within my claim. This doesnt affect the contents of this
case

Our name is something i use to intercourse with society. It is just a tool we could just use
anonymous if we wanted.. all the court is that u testify under oath or affirmation is all we
want to clear up..who did what to do? Lets hear it in open court verifiably so..

- The court cannot try a case against you until you're ready

Compare to Virginia supreme court rule 7b:4b

Rule 7B:4. Trial of Action. (a) Method of bringing action. A civil action in a general district
court may be brought by warrant, summons or complaint directed to the sheriff or to any
other person authorized to serve process, requiring such individual to summon the person
against whom the claim is asserted to appear before the court on a certain day to answer
the complaint of the plaintiff set out in the warrant, summons or complaint. (b) When action
heard. If all parties appear and are ready for trial on the return date of the warrant,
summons or complaint, the court may proceed with the trial of the case.

351 | P a g e

If you nor ready the judge cant force one to duel if the private administrative side is still
trying to work things out and not bring it before a judge because you would rather settle it
on the private the judge must agree to give you the time u need..

Certify vs verify, and understanding jurisdiction

Certified is saying only that someone believes that piece of paper exist..Verify is when they
can say what is true on the paper in open court and press the record..

The only answer you accept in court is a verifiable answer as one of your rules

Notice the court dont motion them!! Ur in power not them

Only a man who you have caused harm can have authority over you jurisdiction is who has
jurisdiction or authority to move my body? Am i stepping on someones toes because that
gives them the jurisdiction to get me off their toes

Usually the prosecutor is bring the claim on behalf on someone just like a trustee for his
grantor..but u are simply insisting that the grantor show up.

Are we in article3 court? (only in US) article3 courts are common law courts in the US.

As a man we do not need to give our name in the claim.

Hold court as they come to arrest us with a signed warrant, inform the officer that I am a
man not the person. If they still arrest us then we are contracting with them.

352 | P a g e

Where do you derive the right to administer my property without my consent? we have the
right from the codes codes only give you obligations, duties, and privileges, only a man has
rights.

How to handle an arraignment

Dont say anything during arraignment to the judge/court, just require leave of court to
respond ; I a man (name) am here to settle any verifiable claims
We are not interested in judges explaining code to us, we still dont understand it. its not
our contract.
Theres no statute of limitations on a man.

What if were from China and came to a common law country, what is our legal person if we
dont have a birth certificate?

- Attorneys are powerless in a common law court

We dont need case law to support our argument, we bring our own law into the court with
our claim. You say you didnt do me wrong, ok, lets take this in front of a jury.

Lawyers and representatives of the state dont have first hand knowledge of the case and
thus cannot address the jury.

The courts are free for us to use

353 | P a g e

Every Court of record is the king's Court, in right of his crown and dignity, though his
subjects have the benefit of it ; and therefore no other court loath. authority to fine and
imprison ; so that the very erection of a new jurisdiction, with power of fine or
imprisonment, :sakes it instantly a Court of record, The free use of all courts of record and
not of record, is to be granted to the people :
We are the kings subjects.. and as we are considered equal to the king u may see i as
the king too..so long as i get in for free.

If you are having prolems with the clerk write a nice simple letter
i believe i have chosen a simple method to move my case through the court; i have chosen
to appear before a federal district court in the capacity of a man aggrieved; making simple
wishes and demands to order to order the restoration of my rights to seek compensation for
said wrong. That being said i present to this distric court of Alabama my case; i a man wish
and respectfully demand of this court 1. To file my suit 2. To give me a case action number 3.
To deliver enclosed summonses to the wrong doers 4. Please time and file stamp my original
copies to the suit and mail it back to my address5 it is my wish to not be charged a fee and i
do not want to diminish my capacity to that of a pauper; it is my wish for my standing to
remain as that of a man aggrieved; i do not believe i have been presented a bill for services
rendered; i dont believe any officer in this court can claim a debt: i do believe this court was
created for the use of man and those of mankind to settle contentious matters in a civil
matter without a fee; i declare i appear before this court to seek the restoration of my rights
that are secured and protect by the united states constitution and as all of the officers have
bound themselves to the constitution; i as a man call upon the officers of this court to
perform their duties; that being said if the office of this court believes i am in error of this
belief; i have enclosed a filing fee of $350 demanded of me by the clerk of the court for the
matter of controversy between i and the governor of the state of Alabama; has gone on for
too many years; so take this money so we can move this case now: for once this case is
settled everything can be returned; if you wish to to allow me to proceed feel free to return
the $350 to me at my said address.

If a clerk of the court is giving one a hard time .. go to the head clerk which is the head chief
judge . and talk right to his secretary. This is an exparte conversation as it will go directly to
the judge as she is his representative.

One of the positions is they havent done anything for you yet..

corpus juris secundum second edtion section 7 4 4 all federal courts are courts of record
must get book to verify

354 | P a g e

corpus juris volume 25 under federal courts section 344 what it says Federal district
courts are courts of record.
Supreme court of the united states is the highest court of the usa but not of the land the
common law is the highest law of the land (people)

If they some nonsense about we dont do common law courts and it doesnt no longer exist.
Reply with When did we become me? We is not me and when did they outlaw the common
law and i need you to show me..i hear u saying we dont do common law anymore but can u
show me (they may show u a code)
Respond with thats a code ..when did u throw away YOUR constitution? Because it clearly
says in your contract between the governments that they will not interfere with the rights of
man and if anyone interferes with their rights that they have the right to sue the wrong
doer.

Amendment VII(7)
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right
of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined
in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

We are not a party to it because once u sign a contract u relinquish certain rights for
privileges.. so i dont want a privilege from anyone as it interferes with my rights as a man..

If they dont show up its a nihil dicit judgement as u get to face your accuser in a common
law court of record..

If were the prosecutor, they need to just answer to us, because its our court, our rules.
They want to ask questions? Get their own claim and their own court. No claim against me?
My court, my rules.

Case. We determine whats in our case, how to set it up, what the rules are. The defendant is
just one piece of our case.

Is there a verifiable criminal complaint against me? are you not going to bring the witness?
Is anyone going to be testifying? No? then Im filing a claim against you, because youre

355 | P a g e

saying that Ive done wrong/Ive committed crime, but not bringing any injured party to
court. To move court you must have a plaintiff, and the plaintiff must appear in open court.
His attorney can be there but the plaintiff MUST be there. so youre filing a false claim, and
what you wished executed on your brother will now fall on you.

if a plaintiff shows up and testify under oath or affirmation that Ive done him harm, Ill
compensate him right now.

No matter who charges us, never come into court as a defendant unless weve harmed an
actual man or woman.
Nihil dicit is Latin for "he says nothing"; a judgment for want of a plea. The name of a
judgment which a judge may render against a defendant who failed to plead and failed to
answer a plaintiff's declaration or complaint within the prescribed time limit. The defendant
failed to say why the court should not issue the judgment against him. The failure to say
constitutes an admission of the justice of the cause of action against the defendant; it does
so more strongly than a mere default.
You would be held liable to the judgment terms as if you did not appear in court and the
plaintiff/prosecution receives whatever you're seeking from the Judge.

Blackstones commentary
PRIVATE WRONGS.
BOOK III.
Ch. 23.
But in both these instances the jury may, if they thing proper, take upon themselves to
determine at their own hazard, the complicated question of fact and law; and, without either
special verdict or special case, may find a verdict absolutely either for the plaintiff or
defendant.

Queens bench are courts of record.

1)
2)
3)
4)
5)

generally has a seal

has power to fine or imprison for contempt
keeps a permanent record of the proceedings
proceeds according to the common law (not statutes or codes)
has a tribunal which is independent of the magistrate (judge)

356 | P a g e

there is no vs., because hes not a defendant, hes a wrong-doer. We are the aggrieved party
prosecutor. A man, (name) prosecutor | robert benton , chairman of the DHR, a public
servant, a man, a wrong-doer
Im not fighting the man, Im just making a claim because Ive been wronged and I require
compensation.
Im not fighting, Im not bringing a controversy into this court or public. Im saying I want
compensation for I believe Ive been done wrong by these people.
If they want to come forward and say Im making a false claim let them come forward.
Prosecutor just means Im pursuing. I hope you dont answer my claim because Ill just get a
nihil dicit (he says nothing) judgement against you. (note: we are not using the latin here,
the judge will just call it that). More powerful than a default judgment.

No notice of court, no judicial notice, just notice

The state cannot take your kids without proper adjudication and a court order
Attorney general states that the state of Alabama has no right to take any child within its
borders into its custody, the only children they have control over are those who have been
adjudicated in their care.

Do you have a court order? no they only have a complaint.

If you accept a lower monetary counter offer, your case will be dismissed
Were suing someone for 10mil, and they offer us 1mil, we conditionally accept your offer of
1mil dollars but that does not negate the fact that theres still an outstanding balance
between us.

357 | P a g e

If we accept their lower offer unconditionally, our original claim of 10mil is a false claim.

Attorneys try to play the word reasonable. If lawyers get us to change our claim by 1mm
or 1 minute, our claim becomes untrue. That is my word and I am sticking to it. Jacobs
father blessed him and did not go back on his word, even though he meant to bless his other
son.
My claim stands true until another man can come forth with a verifiable claim that I filed a
false claim. I shall not be moved. Thats my word and Im sticking to it.

When you say its the order of court, court means the jury+the plaintiff+defendant, not
the judge. No a, the, this court, just court. AT the STATE OF ALABAMAs court case
stylized as JU2001832 to be known to the world as void from the beginning (stay away from
ab initio, its latin/legalese) and all of its subsequent orders ought to have no force of
operation.

Dont use pro se, we are not pro se, it is legalese. Im just an aggrieved man.
AGGRIE'VED, participle passive Pained; afflicted, civilly or politically oppressed.
Dont use deemed, thats legalese.

Obtaining the facts and evidence from the other side before trial
If we are denied access to evidence/casefile. Were trying to get discovery and lawyers are
blocking us. They might say they dont give evidence until day of trial. This is not true. Dont
let them make us assume this.
Some lawyers wont even prepare a casefile against us (lazy), presuming that well get a
lawyer or be appointed one and be sold out.

I need to see the evidence in order to prepare proper defense and to obtain competent
council. I will also not intercourse in a trial by ambush.
Whenever we talk to a person we should also put it in writing. (notice)

358 | P a g e

how am I to obtain competent legal counsel unless they know how to set a retaining fee?
He needs to know what you folks are going to present to the court so he can set a fee.

Dont actually get a lawyer, but this is a way to delay the trial or get the file ordered from
the court from the guy in the black robe, then the judge will write the plaintiff and order
them to give him their whole case. Then hell have jurisdiction and control over the states
claim. Then judge BOB will write us and tell us that hes got the copy of casefiles.

i require discovery lady says we call it disclosure not discovery, follow the rules notice to
order full disclosure [cf. motion for discovery]

Plaintiff makes claim in his court, then he turns his claim over to THE court, and argue his
case before THE court against the wrong-doer, then THE court decides.

'ARGUE, verb intransitive [Latin arguo, to show, argue accuse or convict.]

1. To reason; to invent and offer reasons to support or overthrow a proposition, opinion or
measure; as, A argues in favor of a measure; B argues against it.
2. To dispute; to reason with; followed by with; as, you may argue with your friend, a week,
without convincing him.
'ARGUE, verb transitive
1. To debate or discuss; to treat by reasoning; as, the counsel argued the cause before the
supreme court; the cause was well argued.
2. To prove or evince; to manifest by inference or deduction; or to show reasons for; as, the
order visible in the universe argues a divine cause.
3. To persuade by reasons; as, to argue a man into a different opinion.
4. Formerly, to accuse or charge with; a Latin sense, now obsolete; as, to argue one of
profaneness.
We go to court to argue our case.
Do not go to small claims court, it diminishes the capacity of our court. Always be in our
common law court of record at queens bench.

359 | P a g e

It is my wish not to film anything other than my courtroom proceeding..this is tot avoid them
telling u what u cant film so as to not look complying

Kalr likes to hide his rules in notices

Ie.. notice this is what i consider jurisdiction
Notice this is what i consider the venue
.ths what i consider is the plaintiff, defendant, respondant
The notices are the rulez

sneaky

Nobody objected to the notices

Nobody should refer to me as a plaintiff will be in contempt of my court, as i am a claimant

under my court!! Because in my court my name is defined as claimant.. u cant call me
anything else as i am clearly defined in my court!!

A plaintiff in French is a nagging

plaintiff (n.)
c. 1400, from Anglo-French pleintif (late 13c.), noun use of Old French
plaintif "complaining; wretched, miserable,"
tell the judge calling u plaintiff as this is like calling you names and ur insulted..i am not
wretched and that i a man find this highly insult and u will be in contempt of court.

Warn the prosecutor too.. that by pursuing this falling claim you are wasting and trying tto
harm me a man and that he should cease and decist before you have to file a claim against
him too..

360 | P a g e

If the state is placing charges against i a man then go to the head prosecutor and send it to
states attourney general i believe there is a state procesutor assistant the attouirney
general who is going to be prosecuting this case, in a ____(insert whatever court youll be
at).. i believe he is moving in eror..i am giving you fair warning for him to cease and desist or
i am going to have to file a claim on my own

Legalese definition of "suffer"

Means u accetted it and allowed it to happen.. u had all the ability to stop him and u didnt
Stay away from this word.. dont say u suffered at the hands of the police!!we did not accept
and do nothing to protect ourselves from the police beating !!

Suffer
SUF'FER, verb transitive [Latin suffero; sub, under, and fero, to bear; as we say, to
undergo.]
1. To feel or bear what is painful, disagreeable or distressing, either to the body or mind; to
undergo. We suffer pain of body; we suffer grief of mind. The criminal suffers punishment;
the sinner suffers the pangs of conscience in this life, and is condemned to suffer the wrath
of an offended God. We often sufferwrong; we suffer abuse; we suffer injustice.
2. To endure; to support; to sustain; not to sink under.
Our spirit and strength entire,
Strongly to suffer and support our pains.
3. To allow; to permit; not to forbid or hinder. Will you suffer yourself to be insulted?
I suffer them to enter and possess.
Thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbor, and not suffer sin upon him. Lex.19.
4. To undergo; to be affected by. Substances suffer an entire change by the action of fire, or
by entering into new combinations.
5. To sustain; to be affected by; as, to suffer loss or damage.

361 | P a g e

SUF'FER, verb intransitive To feel or undergo pain of body or mind; to bear what is
inconvenient. We suffer with pain, sickness or sorrow. We suffer with anxiety. We suffer by
evils past and by anticipating others to come. We sufferfrom fear and from disappointed
hopes.
1. To undergo, as punishment.
The father was first condemned to suffer on a day appointed, and the son afterwards, the
day following.
2. To be injured; to sustain loss or damage. A building suffers for want of seasonable repairs.
It is just that we should suffer for neglect of duty.
Public business suffers by private infirmities.

Be prepared this is a life stylea mind set..the judge is really going to test your metal!!! Be
ready!!!

108 - Want vs. require in court

I judge may like to slip this word in to gain jurisdiction..do you WANT me to call u a
witness? if one says yes u just said he is your daddy because no man wants for anything
god provides for all!!! U REQUIRE he bring s the witness to the stand as he is your servant!!!
Not the other way around!! Forgetting the judge works for u coulkd be costly!!!

This man works for you DONT FORGET IT!!!

Sorry, I'm from a foreign culture

We may come from a foreign culture where our behavior is acceptable there but not here,
once we discover this, we ask for forgiveness and that should be all we need to avoid
criminal charges. Its like the African guy who impregnates his 8 year old niece, gets off free
because its a beautiful thing in his culture.

- Answer the second dimension with the second dimension

362 | P a g e

Because our birth certificate is the 2D entity theyre really after (its the security interest
instrument) so they can actually take their charges out of that certificate. (as a last resort)
the 2D requires a 2D response, so we respond in writing.

Your confession grants jurisdiction

When judge talks fast at us saying do you understand youre waiving your rights when you
signwhen you.etc, we say I dont understand anything of this legalese youre
saying nor can I be compelled to. Im just here to settle any verifiable true debt or claim
against me, and to ask forgiveness of any man or woman I may have harmed. Who is my
accuser so I may face them?

who say I do wrong?

are you telling me that 18kg of cocaine in my back trunk is wrong? BOB? If thats your
belief then I require you to put it in writing and sign your name that I did wrong, and then Ill
sign my name after that. (non assumpsit)

Dont let judges funnel us into saying we do wrong (when no ones harmed.)

Reducing your public defender's role to that of co council

Dont get rid of a public defender, reduce them to co council instead and well speak for
ourselves. Co councils are a great asset, tell whoevers moving the case on us (the
prosecutor) that were going to take our attorney that they gave us and make him our cocouncil, so that way he cant enter contracts without our consent. He can just sit there and
translate the legalese for us. Ok you just sit there behind me and when I need you Ill let
you know, I dont require for anyone to act on my behalf. I can do this all on my own, but
thank you for giving me this public defender, but now Im going to reduce his role to that of
a co council.

363 | P a g e

When in arraignment: were looking for a claim, for injured parties, for damages, for anybody
who wants to say that Ive done something wrong, Im here to settle any verifiable true debt.
We do this in writing, not with your mouth.

Your right to cross examine your accuser

I dont believe any man or woman in this court has jurisdiction or control over me; And I
dont believe Ive harmed any man or woman in this court room; I dont believe Ive injured
any man or womans property in this court room; and I dont believe Ive lie to any man or
woman in this courtroom (breach of contract); so I dont believe anyone has a claim that Ive
done anybody in this courtroom wrong; if any man or woman steps forward with a proper
verifiable true claim I will be happy to compensate them;

If the prosecutor says the plaintiff is the STATE OF ALABAMA, then the STATE OF ALABAMA
must appear, so that I can cross examine my accuser.

Remember a trial by jury doesnt allow a compliant to be heard by the juryso the
prosecution has his hands tide.
If u dont open ur own case all u will be doing is saying their case sucksDONT!!! thats just
rudeJust show your case has merit not there by bringing your own case before the court
then ur not saying anything bad about their case

How to deal with a psych evaluation

If a judge ask u to take a psych evaluation

Write the judge to explain why he wants the psych eval done is it to 1. Determine whether i
am competent to answer question in court in legalese 2. Or that i your trying to deduce that
i am delusional or psychotic or psychiatric in nature? Please tell me what the concerns or
information you are tyring to gather about my mental state? and what are u trying to derive

364 | P a g e

from the psych eval? What is the benefit for me or the court?
is this an order and if so am i going to be compensated for carrying it out?

If the court request anything from you find out is it an order and r going to be compensated
for it and what is the benefit for me and them and what are they trying to accomplish with
it?

Remember no man can order another man around without compensation as slavery is not
allowed..

Providing a product holds you liable

Take donations to avoid liability as its more a kin to a prayer.. if your prayer doesnt work oh
well!!
Churches take donationswink wink

Filing a claim against a complaint

Make sure when u file your claim you have to make sure you served the side properly after
that you take the evidence that you served then properly and give it to the clerk for the
judge to create a case file number for you so that your court is there trumping their court.
U are setting it up so both courts are there to be heard at the same time?
Just showing at the trial without proper notice, 21 days before they appear to answer for
themselves in open court
filing a claim on the spot is considered ambushing your opponent.. give proper notice..

dont file counter claim or counter complaints you are filing a claim against their complaint..
if somebody is complaining that i do wrong to a man or woman..i am filing a claim that they
are filing a false complaint and that theya re wasting my valuable time resources as well as
the courts valuable time and resources because they are never going to be able to prove
their complaint is true. Thats the mind set as one approaches these situations

365 | P a g e

the letter would go more like this:

-the claim itself should read:

there is some man named bob who has filed a complaint that i done wrong to the state of
north Carolina; I dont know who the state of north Carolina is; maybe bob can come to court
and explain more clearly to me but for me to make my special appearance I want to be
compensated for my lost time because this is a frivolous complaint that has no merit; and i
require to be let alone.

Judge may ask you if you want to work in the best interest of the child or do some parenting
course or do some stupid thing or another(they are trying to contract with you)..just say no
thank you ! i a man require immediate restoration of property
-they will send back a letter telling you to appear in court.
-letter two is a reply stating hold on a minute see exhibit A, the previous communications i
sent you; it clearly states that i am an I not a you.
-now take your claim to the clerk who has the original complaint and hand them your claim
and for the court clerk to file this in bobs case as my response because I dont know who
bob or Canada are

Paying you court fee..how would you like to apy the $80.. u can offer them if u cant afford
the lump sum $1 a day for the next 80 days and they will accept.. generally its the best you
can do. Be honorable folk.
The right to self govern is a responsibility and judges want to see someone who is true and
real.

On the record
On the record only happens with the spoken word under oath or affirmation in an open
courtin viva voche
Elvis Presley cant make a record until he signs it
Record means verbal

366 | P a g e

In legalese (administrative courts) they can take the written word as on the record but not a
court of record moving under the common law.
The legal world can twist their words anytime they want because its their term of art.. they
have the right to do whatever they want to do with it. We dont have a license to understand
the words of their society.

We dont understand their legalese as they dont understand our common law gibberish.
Hence why the lowly clerks have no clue as they arent trained todont get mad be
understanding ur presenting what looks like gibbersh with your common law
common law and common sense are sadly none too common...

Man doesnt answer to legal gibberish. He only answers to another man, hence a claim
better be on the table or a signature on a order..

On ones day in court thats when one presses the record..

The do it under affirmation not oath..but u can do it on oath..my belief say affirmation is for
me..
So you utter for the record (repeat your claim word for word) and then you ask the other side
to speak for the record and the other side cant create it because it doesnt have a voice..

Who is this mystical magical THEY u mean some man named bob in a black robe..
If he gives u an order get it ion writing and sign it then send him a bill he is not your judge
he is the cases judge?

Dismissed vs discharged

367 | P a g e

Dismissed is it can go away for a while but can come back; discharged means its gone
forever. We cant sue anyone if its dismissed, because the case is still open, we still need to
finish it. if its discharged, its then a false charge, and we have cause.

- UCC in court
No government created a baby. So they cant say they have a vested interest. They werent
in bed with you
Trying to get you property (child) using ucc is strange because that is someone elses belief
system.
We didnt create the ucc so use dont know what it means.. we arent licensed to use their
language..ucc is intellectual property of someone else u have no permission.. in fact judges
want you to use it because they have a license to interpret for you.STAY CLEAR OF UCC!!

Just ask for your property!!!

If an attorney say accordin to some code blah blah or statute you broke the code
So you ask him are you going to take the stand and testify that that is exactly what it
means?
hell say no
Reply well then thats just your opinion then isnt it?
U: Did u write that code?
Att; No
U:do you have the person who wrote the code here?
Att: no
U: because the code was written from the public law do you have law before the court?

368 | P a g e

Att: no its rolled up in sacramento somewhere

u: no public law where the code came from .. u dont have the guy who wrote the code and u
wont swear that this is exactly what the code means your simply giving me ur opinion of
what he wrote

- Finding the plaintiff

If the state is coming after you for whatever.. send a letter to the plaintiff asking if they are
going to bring the state of texas to court so i can cross examine my accuser?
Simply ask the court clerk Do you have the plaintiffs address so i can properly sever them a
proposal so i can settle the matter before going into open court, because i dont know who
they are?
You sent it to me and you sent this letter obviously to them.. so what is the address or post
office number i can send this to?
In Texas u would send a copy to the govern and the secretary of state..not sure for Canada is
the equivalent the premiere and the attorney general?

The plaintiff must appear works whether you are the defendant or a man with all his rights..

Treat letter like google de gup.. u cant really make heads or tails of it except a date and an
address..
So u just want to inquire more details form the plaintiff..

- Court of original jurisdiction and the supreme court

Supreme court decision always go back to the court of original jurisdiction..and the original
judge can ignore those rullings!!
In administrative hearings a judge can gtake 10 years if he likes to come up with a ruling
and there is nothing u can do about that because u bound yourself to his rules .. he may

369 | P a g e

argue that he is taking his time because he doesnt want to make a mistake and take forever
(you the man and person)

How to refer to the man in the black robe

KL likes to look around like he is bored out of his mind.. because he has put his paper work
in..he doesnt want to have a convo with the judge.. if the judge ask you a question reply
withu talking to me BOB he will replyu can call me judge
U reply i have only one judge and he is God
ur not my judge
ur the cases judge which you preside over, not over me
HE IS JUST A MAN LIKE US NOT OUR JUDGE

- Judge vs civil administrative hearing officer

Civil administrative hearing officers deal with contract disputes between the state and the
person holding the license/permit. This policy officer here says you breached the contract
broke the code #so and so, did you or did you not? Yes? Then you need to be penalized for
your breach. If you wanna keep operating under this piece of plastic youre gonna pay the
fine. But if you tell me youre a man going from point A to point B then I dont have
jurisdiction over you. But if you want to be a card-holding member of our little society, you
have to operate under our rules.

The whole gambit is to let the court know they have no jurisdiction over us.

Asking about jurisdiction, and when to speak in court

How do you believe you have jurisdiction over me? through a license? A permit? A franchise?
How? how do you believe you have the right to bring me forth before your tribunal? When
did you believe you acquired that power/right/authority?

370 | P a g e

Dont open our mouth in administrative court, everything in writing. Proves were
competent. Never show any sign of competency/understanding in their court. Were idiots in
their court. When were in our court, we are competent.

Rights are property, and when to speak in court

My rights are my property like my heartbeat my dreams my aspirations my goals theyre all
part of my property, a subset of my property, and governmenrts only exist to protect private
property. when my rights are trespassed upon I a man am harmed.

When we claim property we cover all things. Rights, children, land, name, time, animals
etc.

Are you talking to me as a man? No? Youre talking to me as a public servant? I

dont require any of your services at this time. Please let me alone. The law
doesnt say anything, the law reads, that little book you have? Youre interpreting
the law. You know youre talking to a man, and I a man am telling you that your
interpretation of the code is trespassing on my property. Put that in front of a
judge/jury in a common law court of record, well see how they believe what you
interpret the code reads.

I want that person to come across the room and point to me and say that I did him wrong. I
wish to meet the plaintiff and settle it with the man. I want to compensate whomever it is
that Ive done wrong. Anyone else I dont want to hear it.

When the court is open its in session, anything filed is in closed court. Open court is open to
the public to witness. out in the open

Take vs. present a notice

371 | P a g e

Dont ever say take notice in our docs, always say I a man present you this notice

Understanding orders in court

All orders come from the plaintiff/claimant/prosecutor or the defendant/wrong-doer, not from
the judge.
Attorneys can only propose orders, he cant place an order before the court. I a man can
place the order. When the judge/jury comes back, theyll make a decision on whether to
recognize the order
Cus the lawyer doesnt want to have any liability, anyone who places the order is liable for
that order.

If we come in as the defendant, we must accept all orders of the court (orders proposed by
attorneys/lawyers then recognized by judge/jury). We cannot bill the order.
If we come in as I the man, we can bill the orders.

A minute order is when a new fact has come up and has just made us aware that we need to
amend our order.

There must be a real party of interest when we sue, no imaginary characters like
officer/captain/santaclaus. A judge is just a guy watching two guys do a pistol duel. Hes just
there to referee/keep the agreed-upon rules of the game.

We make a claim, theyve been served (denied or ignored), theres a controversy. We go to

court.

- Competancy and habeus corpus

I cant enter into your court without competency to understanding the charges. Everyone
has the right to know what theyre being charged with.

372 | P a g e

Habeas corpus is suspended for Guantanamo bay because theyre charged under treason or
felony, which are not protected by habeas corpus.

An incompetent, or idiot bares no liability

Incompetent simply means you dont understand exactly what is going on at this time nad
that u dont believe youre going to be held liable or that one is bound by the rules of court
because you are not competent to provide a proper answer at this time.
They cant make someone who is incompetent answer a question.
Husband is the bondsman for the wife.. he holds all liability for his wife and children
Next friend is a status where u can help the incompetent and idiots..
Idiot cannot be contracted with because its unethical one cannot take advantage of or
capitalize on someone less fortunate.

Show that you're making your best effort

If you get a judgment that saying you are only able to pay $30 dollar a month
because of hard times. Make sure you pay back with your best effortpay $30.07 and the
following $30.13 and next one $30.05 this really shows youre best effortbecause the
next mont you may only be able to give $13.08 and an apology that you have historically
tried to pay the best i could but this month i cant but i promise to keep trying my best to
pay you back. they will have to forgive you

373 | P a g e

Come in with the person (paper) and say do all you want with the person but you cannot do
anything to I the man. I will not put up my body to bond this defendant out of jail but what i
will do is put up this piece of paper. I will put up federal reserve notes or security
instruments. This is a birth certificate is a security instrument i hope u get what u need out
of it. Is that going to be enough for the defendant to be released.

Latches as opposed to laches

The statues of limitations lache you. Once you believe youre latched instead of lached
which is fake, then you put yourself under their spell/jurisdiction.

Public law vs. code

I didnt write the code, did the judge write the code? State prosecutor? No? is the person
who wrote the code present today? Is the person who wrote the contract present today? If
the code/contract is in error whos going to be held liable? How can I answer to a code that
nobody here wrote? And you guys are gonna just guess what that code means? No I need to
know exactly what that means, who wrote this thing? I require that you bring the law before
the court, not the code.

Bill->votes by congress->signed into public law-> enrolled sitting in library of congress,

12345 pages long, and the code is a few sentences.

We dont want the code, we want the actual public law. Insist on the law being read into
court. I wasnt party to the law, did you sign it? Are we gonna have anyone come forward
and swear to any of those signatures on the law? Is anyone here a signatory on that law? I
need to face them.

Restoration of property
Point across the room and say that man/woman touched my property, see exhibit a,b,c,d,
(4 kids) dont give them our kids names (names are things of value), just use photographs
as exhibits. Include in claim. I want property returned now

374 | P a g e

What is the common belief of the people, if its in our favour, then trial by jury; sometimes
we want just the judge to carry the letter of the law in our court.
Dont bring in a jury if you have to educate them in open court.

The courthouse belongs to us

Building manager of the court house is the chief judge, steward of the public court. Hes
keeping the court for the people, waiting on the people, preserving the court in a manner
that will function efficiently for when the people/king/queen/crown/sovereign appears and
needs to hold court. Hes there in service of the court, hes not the court.
If they try to point out that its public policy of the building that we cant do that, but do you
realize that the king has arrived in court? Are you trying to tell the king what he can or
cannot do in his realm? In his kingdom? In his castle? The judge is just the building
manager, who do you think hes managing the building for? I have now arrived.
Just ask the managerdo you say I do wrong? because wrong is the worst word you can say
to a man. Doing wrong is admitting that you know better but still doing it wrong, with
deliberate intent. Hold steadfast, yes or no did I do wrong? If he says I do wrong, then
wheres the damage whos been harmed, not speculation/conjecture, show me where the
actual damages the present damages which is by me doing what I did. Dont tell me it could
go wrong, not conjecture/speculation, cant accuse me of wrong due to a
speculation/conjecture, it must be an actual event that has occurred/is accuring. Dont tell
me in speculation that it MIGHT occur. This is MY court, this is the PEOPLES building. If the
queen can hold court 3am in the morning, so can we, we are equals before god.
Our court will run a full year of 365 term, it can be convened at anytime during that year day
or night.
Ask judge is the term of my court one year? Starting when?

Holding court is future tense. Always holding court is lining up all the ducks in a row, holding
court is imagining explaining this in future in open court.

375 | P a g e

How to move your case through court

Give proper notice to the other side
Give fair warning if they didnt heed our notice that theyre gonna be sued and that Im
going to move a claim and Im going to do it by trial by jury, and that Im gonna occupy a
public courthouse, and Im gonna require the magistrate and the public building manager
(chief judge) to inform the staff at the courthouse that Im coming in. and Im going to
present my case in open forum in an open court before trial by jury.
Tell the building manager that I need to use the room and that they have rooms available
any time of the day cus I know the courts open 24/7 365, make him fully aware that he
knows that I know the courts open 24/7, not 9-5. I know in 21 days there should be a room
available, if not Im gonna hold it in the hallway.

Obviously the defendants gonna be summoned to appear, and theyre not gonna appear. If
the defendant doesnt show up, and we get a default judgement, they have the right to
contest the judgement. Thats ok, our case is tight. Sheriffs are used to carry out levies.

- Do you believe I do wrong?

someone tries to hand you a citation u say i only answer to claims..citation is not a claim. I
thought i was here because someone says i do wrong? Is anybody here say i do or did
wrong? Where does it say in your codes or statues that i did wrong? Wrong is a common law
term. The state cant say u do wrong because we are its creators. U cant turn to god and tell
him he is wrong because he will just laugh at you..

Come in with the person (paper birthcertificate) and say do all you want with the person but
you cannot do anything to I the man. I will not put up my body to bond this defendant out of
jail but what i will do is put up this piece of paper. I will put up federal reserve notes or
security instruments. This is a birth certificate is a security instrument i hope u get what u
need out of it. Is that going to be enough for the defendant to be released?

376 | P a g e

How to reclaim your status as a man

File our notice of error: We made a mistake of answering as a defendant before, because we
do not have the capacity. We were just made aware that were not the defendant. Im sorry I
wasted the courts time and energy. At once time I thought it was a great benefit to be a
defendant, at present I maintain that I hold constructive possession of said article,
constructive possession (one time I believed it was in my best interest to possess this thing),
now its become constructive trespass ( I wish it to be gone but it wont leave).
I on this date believe Ive erred back on (date). For I believe I was in a state of disequilibrium
and incapacitation to have made such a wish, for the go between is to bind my person with
said article, so today august.19th I wish for the immediate removal of said article from
property and I.From this date after whomever he or she sayeth said article is to remain
about thy person will be the causal agent of trespass to property and will be held liable for
monetary compensation for damages. From day forth (date) whomever comes and says that
that article is to remain on my person on my property will be the cause of trespass on me
and my property and will be held liable for compensation.

- Public law vs. code

I didnt write the code, did the judge write the code? State prosecutor? No? is the person
who wrote the code present today? Is the person who wrote the contract present today? If
the code/contract is in error whos going to be held liable? How can I answer to a code that
nobody here wrote? And you guys are gonna just guess what that code means? No I need to
know exactly what that means, who wrote this thing? I require that you bring the law before
the court, not the code.

Bill->votes by congress->signed into public law-> enrolled sitting in library of congress,

12345 pages long, and the code is a few sentences.

We dont want the code, we want the actual public law. Insist on the law being read into
court. I wasnt party to the law, did you sign it? Are we gonna have anyone come forward
and swear to any of those signatures on the law? Is anyone here a signatory on that law? I
need to face them.

377 | P a g e

Latches as opposed to laches

The statues of limitations lache you. Once you believe youre latched instead of lached
which is fake, then you put yourself under their spell/jurisdiction.

The courthouse belongs to us

Building manager of the court house is the chief judge, steward of the public court. Hes
keeping the court for the people, waiting on the people, preserving the court in a manner
that will function efficiently for when the people/king/queen/crown/sovereign appears and
needs to hold court. Hes there in service of the court, hes not the court.
If they try to point out that its public policy of the building that we cant do that, but do you
realize that the king has arrived in court? Are you trying to tell the king what he can or
cannot do in his realm? In his kingdom? In his castle? The judge is just the building
manager, who do you think hes managing the building for? I have now arrived.
Just ask the managerdo you say I do wrong? because wrong is the worst word you can say
to a man. Doing wrong is admitting that you know better but still doing it wrong, with
deliberate intent. Hold steadfast, yes or no did I do wrong? If he says I do wrong, then
wheres the damage whos been harmed, not speculation/conjecture, show me where the
actual damages the present damages which is by me doing what I did. Dont tell me it could
go wrong, not conjecture/speculation, cant accuse me of wrong due to a
speculation/conjecture, it must be an actual event that has occurred/is accuring. Dont tell
me in speculation that it MIGHT occur. This is MY court, this is the PEOPLES building. If the
queen can hold court 3am in the morning, so can we, we are equals before god.
Our court will run a full year of 365 term, it can be convened at anytime during that year day
or night.
Ask judge is the term of my court one year? Starting when?

Holding court is future tense. Always holding court is lining up all the ducks in a row, holding
court is imagining explaining this in future in open court.

What is the common belief of the people, if its in our favour, then trial by jury; sometimes
we want just the judge to carry the letter of the law in our court.

378 | P a g e

Dont bring in a jury if you have to educate them in open court.

Restoration of property
Point across the room and say that man/woman touched my property, see exhibit a,b,c,d,
(4 kids) dont give them our kids names (names are things of value), just use photographs
as exhibits. Include in claim. I want property returned now

When they tried to sue the WWF, they changed the name to WWE. The judgement could not
be collected. Thats why a judgement without the ability to collect means nothing.

How to move your case through court

Give proper notice to the other side
Give fair warning if they didnt heed our notice that theyre gonna be sued and that Im
going to move a claim and Im going to do it by trial by jury, and that Im gonna occupy a
public courthouse, and Im gonna require the magistrate and the public building manager
(chief judge) to inform the staff at the courthouse that Im coming in. and Im going to
present my case in open forum in an open court before trial by jury.
Tell the building manager that I need to use the room and that they have rooms available
any time of the day cus I know the courts open 24/7 365, make him fully aware that he
knows that I know the courts open 24/7, not 9-5. I know in 21 days there should be a room
available, if not Im gonna hold it in the hallway.

Obviously the defendants gonna be summoned to appear, and theyre not gonna appear. If
the defendant doesnt show up, and we get a default judgement, they have the right to
contest the judgement. Thats ok, our case is tight. Sheriffs are used to carry out levies.

Dont run into court with a claim, do the proper paperwork and file. Until weve given them
notice that theyve done us wrong, and that they still continue doing us wrong after the
notice. For instance, ignoring the notices that weve just sent them, so we make a claim that

379 | P a g e

hey if you dont back off youll be harming me. Explain our claim in the administrative
process before you file it at a court, we order them to stop because theyre trespassing. If
they dont stop causing us harm well be requiring compensation.

Prosecuting the prosecutor

If someone brings a false accusation upon us, we can bring a suit to them for making a false
claim against us. The state is a fiction, so its only the prosecutor, BOB the man who is
harming us, full liability. Where do you get the right to bring this false claim against I the
man?

When facing off with a state council, they will have an edge over us, its their word over
ours. If were in administrative court, preponderance of evidence goes to the state in
administrative hearing. Issues of preexisting contracts do not need to be evidenciated. To
make it 50/50, and to require state to provide evidence (contract etc) we must evoke the
common law by filing our claim against the prosecutor and serving them. Creating your
casefile number, they cant create it until weve gone through the proper notifications. We
may need leave of court of minimum 30 days to properly file the claim. Anyone who enters a
plea on my behalf bears full liability for the plea.

Dont speak legalese. In court its 3 seconds for anyone to answer a question. The jury is to
take the 3 second silence as an answer.

- Jury of your peers in common law

Kalr first saw jury written down on the manga carta. It just a right to be judge by your fellow
knights as a king may not know the custom of your area so he ask the surrouinding
neighbourghhood of people and ask them if this is how they roll out here..if the defendant or
man has always acted. The jury can set a king straight in court of the custom and practices
of the local people. So if law conflict the jury over rules it
A man wants to strive to put like minded people on his jury so they rule in his favour

380 | P a g e

. that a intregral part of common law.

custom even trump common law as what is common law might not be stand up to the great
customs of your people
ie. one goes into a strange land and one offends them with your custom.. and they take u to
court you have a right to fill that jury with your peers so as to show u ment no harm just
practicing your custom. And that u did no wrong remember wrong is when you know
better and still do
keep chanting i did no wrong
judge says guilty not guilty
you just repeat i did no wrong any man claim here i did wrong?
judge repeatsguilty not guilty
again i repeat did i do wrong is there anybody claiming here i do wrong and that i have not
compensated them come forward or forever hold your peace?
obviously write this down dont say outloud!!!

Knowing who you are in court

Civil servants believe they have the powerwhen the truth is the people have the power
the legal society knows it cannot notice the court or testify in court under oath and
affirmation or provide evidence and fact before the court of a common law court
They get you by bringing in you bob and the legal fiction

Play stupid does that code say i did some man harm.. well then i dont know about know
code..i apologize if i hurt your code if you bring him here i will apologize to them..

Realize the judge is not going after you it the prosecutor you have to take issue with as he is
bringing his case
The judge is simply the ref

381 | P a g e

Set judges straight in writing where do you believe you get the authority over i the man?
the judge will quickly reveal to you that he has no authority over you as a man
so where does the prosecutor derives his authority over i the man?
And the prosecutor should say i have no authority over you a man either
Then close by saying then is there anything else i can help you with today because i stand
here as a man before i go home?

do you believe i a man has to get a license to move from point a to point b?

do this all in writing!!! Work out everything in the pretrial so that by the time you get to trial
u have one questionwhere did you get the authority?

*Beg for forgiveness if you do some one wrong in courtits how you can get off

Watch out for the YOU if you go along with you then the judge has jurisdiction over you
(the man and the defendant)

if you tell a judge he is doing wrongthats like saying they knew better and still did it.
There is no excuse for doing something wrong

I am man claim wish or require. Now maybe your claim has validity maybe some one
come forward with a higher claim and then maybe you both can share or not..but a man
claims.
If a judge ask is this you bob? and bob says yes well then the judge has joinder. Because
on his sheet it has joe listed as the defendant

382 | P a g e

Its a word game. You is pluralone must respond i am a man not a you

Pleas and confessions

If someone is offering u a plea deal it is because u already confessed some where down the
lineu might now remember but u didwhat u did or di d not sya may have led to your
confession
They may ask immediately the person for a plea deal not the man..
they can enter a plea on behave of the defendant but not the man.
People can enter a plea on your behalf but that makes them liable
Because you are a man.
in there case you are the defendant..who cares whats in their case..its whats in your case
So what u say is if you dont stop with their case I am going to file my own claim against
them!

Habeus corpus
- simply means bring the body
- I would like to know why I am in here
Basically who said I did wrong..i want to face my accuser by right and authority
no accuser no testification no case..
hence why they are waiting for you to testify against myself..
they cant compel you to turn states witness on yourself. Although that is all the irs is asking
of you..to voluntarily confess

Evoking the common law

U dont claim the common law u evoke it..I claim. Automatically evokes the common
law
Filing a complaint is legalese

383 | P a g e

Making a claim is common law!!

now if someones comes in a makes a counter claim
then you will bring one piece of proof
The he will bring one piece of proof
then I will bring another piece and son on and so forth
Until one of the two wins

- Putting the prosecutor on the stand

- so u want to put the prosecutor on the stand after you have claimed your court.
Careful a man want for nothing u require them to place the prosecutor on the stand
- then ask them do I owe you anything?
The prosecutor will say no
Respond with Who told you to come in here and take my money?
where is he I want to cross examine them? Who is that guy?
The prosecutor I work for the state
ask back where is that state? Dont I have the right to cross examine that state?
this should make the judge laugh.. because this is the trick revealed like a boss
remember u cant accomplish this unless you make a claim so you can prosecute the
prosecutor.. or else u will be in contempt of (their) court..!!!
the prosecutor is the agent for the principal the state what you require is to see the
principalguess what I dont think the state is going to show up will they be wearing pants
or skirts?
Whats does the principal the state claim I owe? What are the damages? Whats do they
claim I did? What loss have they incurred?
benefit of dismissal is to keep one self-honorable..what one is saying is that if really did
something wrong It gives them some time to make a counter claim.

It goes something like this I wish to have this case dismissed without prejiduce so that any
man wants to come forward at anytime in the future for the next 10 ,000 years and move a
claim against me doing wrong, I would be more than glad to justifiably compensate that man
for anything I have ever done wrong to him as I am here to compensate all but if any man
makes a false claim I want to seek compensation from him for me making me waste my time
answering a false claim.

384 | P a g e

If they make claims of harm ie my eyes are itchy and my nose is running because of those
chickens.. then tell them to hand u a bill show me a doctor bill of your damages I am
sure youre not just making a false claim now!!!??im sure u have proof u can back up
basically where the harm? where is the loss? where is the damages?

- Dealing with the second dimension in court

- if someone has got you contractually pinned down and there is no way outu have a
warrant in debt and they are threating to garnish your salary just simply notice that says I
can only pay __( insert what you can truly afford) per month or year because anything more
would harm you the man at this time and if I run into more money I will pay this debt off as
fast as I can
Because none can verify the bill you are answering to the bill not the man hint hint

Never say no in court..if anything do a conditional acceptance like Gordon hall

If a Judge asks one if the prosecutor would like to proceed? respond with i would like to
proceed right to dismissal and if you dont want to dismiss it with prejudice if not I would like
to get some sort of of scheduling fee for me reappearing here and have to come here and
take time off work and reappear ..so again I would like to proceed to a dismissal with
prejudice because I will come back here if they have a bonafide case against me but if you
dont , I am going to require a scheduling fee, because every one else in the room is getting
paid to be here except me and this should be all fair and just as we should all be getting a
little something for being here.

Talk to judges on a first name bases.

I dont care what it says in the 2D fictional world, Im holding the car in the 3D real physical
world. Someone has to come in and claim that what Im physically in possession of, they
should lawfully be in possession, not me. Until then they have no case.

385 | P a g e

The plaintiff must appear in court, so if the state is the plaintiff, mr/mrs state must still
physically appear, not just by council.

If the plaintiff accuses us of something, even if were already a defendant we have the right
to face our accuser and cross-examine the plaintiff. Require leave of court and put it in
writing. Calm and collected, writing this way we gonna look scaarryyyy.

Understanding judgements
When our claim is before the court, require the judge to make the other side answer this
claim. Because now the claim is in open court, they have one more chance to argue or
contest or deny this claim or forever hold their peace. If not, I demand and require this court
to recognize that my claim is a true claim. Once the court recognizes the claim as true, we
get our judgement, and we can sell it to a company that buys judgements.

If a prosecutor got a judgement, he has to find a way to execute it, the judge doesnt
execute judgements. The same applies for us, we have to get our judgement and then
collect on our own.

A judge is there as witness that our case has merit. And that judgement is for the claimant.
The judge has no authority to execute his own judgements.

***Karl presumes something is afoul when he hears judges executing their own judgements
by telling the guards to take someone into custody for judgements the state wins. The states
should be executing their own judgements, this puts the judge on the side of the state.
(conflict of interest)***

If this should happen, ask the judge : you took the proposed order, you converted it INTO an
order, and then you rendered judgement, and now youre the one whos gonna execute the
judgement? Because if I got a judgement of $1Mill against the state of Alabama you would
tell me to go collect the judgement on my own.

386 | P a g e

All the judge is supposed to say is the judgement for the prosecution, next case.

Legal vs Lawful. Legal is code, Lawful is harm no man

Never let anyone call u a petitioner calling u that is them claim godly authority over you.
Petition is to pray to a deity..
Petition
-dont be like marc stevens who files complaints!! You want to file claims and be a man!!!
-dont make proposal like lawyers.. order, require and wishes because its your court and
youre a man

Thumb print vs. seal

- the lentz court requires the magistrate; it come to the attention of said court that the
services of _______(insert name)magistrate are available to serve their court; if _____(name)
believes he is qualified to administer the affairs of a court of record; his honorable service
will please said court.. signed dated and thumb printed. Done
- ignore gold seals.. just use thumb prints gold seals have finger prints of it. Man trumps
seal
Man trumps person because he created them.. so man turmps seals for the same reason..

Federal rule 26B-to move your partys claim that the defense is that get to know any
description and nature of any condition or location of any document or anything they can
touch or tangible and the location of any person who has knowledge of the wrong you only
compare this rules because its their rules and decision.. you dont want to use their
paperwork.. [cf. Federal rule 26B]

387 | P a g e

How to write to a judge-

The letter should go like this-

Bob, Greetings,

I hear your going to be the civil hearing officer presiding over this matter thats going to
come before you on ______(insert date here ), you go on to explain the rules of your court,

-watch out for AT the queen bench in your writings and filings NOT IN as you are in
your court at their building.

Dont use their paperwork for filings as it gives them jurisdiction..you lost control of any
aspect of you..
-youre applying which means your begging..dont!! write your own forms and letters
uniquely..so as not to lose status..
- you basically are saying your understand and consent to everything in their world by using
their paperwork. DONT!

-dont be like marc stevens who files complaints!! You want to file claims and be a man!!!
-dont make proposal like lawyers.. order, require and wishes because its your court and
youre a man

- Using "shall" to beat tickets

Breaking code = breach of contract. Policy-man enforces policy. Theyre presuming that you
are under that code, and theyre trying to contract with you (ticket). Gov cant order a man
to do anything ..without just compensation because they cannot compel a man to do

388 | P a g e

anything; they can only propose, and shall is a proposition. Until we are under Napoleonic
code, then we screwed.

Shall:
Shall and will are two of the English modal verbs. They have various uses, including the
expression of propositions about the future, in what is usually referred to as the future tense
of English.
The traditional prescriptive grammar rule stated that, when expressing pure futurity (without
any additional meaning such as desire or command), shall was to be used when the subject
was in the first person (I or we), and will in other cases. In practice this rule is commonly not
adhered to by any group of English speakers, and many speakers do not differentiate
between will and shall when expressing futurity, with the use of will being much more
common and less formal than shall. In many specific contexts, however, a distinction still
continues.

We cannot break a code that uses the word shall.

Require officer to read code in open court. Ok I shall

Attorneys and the supreme court

Attorneys dont have belief system they use precedent and case law..
They say things like i dont believe this but the Roberts court of 2006 judge Scolia ruled in
blah blah blha!! they have to go to someone above them who has established the
position of the supreme court

But when as a man establish our position before court we are representative of god.

Attorneys establish position man has beliefs in court..

To govern is to maintain a positon. As a govern on a boat it maintains the position so you

dont have to steer

389 | P a g e

The supreme court makes a decision between the president and the congress. The supreme
court is not supposed to make ruling between me and bob. Because thats not within their
jurisdiction..

I a man is not under the rule of the supreme court..

It could take u a good 12 years to get a ruling in the supreme court but it always go back to
be tried at a court of original jurisdictionand the judge of that case could say that is a
lovely ruling you have there from the supreme court of Alabama but you know what i am
going to disregard it because ur in my case ur in my court house my jurisdiction my realm
and i am telling uit means nothing.. the judge is witness an asshole in front of him he won
care about how good his supreme court paperwork is he will judge against himsupreme
court decision are a waste of time

The constitution and the courts

A man doesnt have to stand up to anybody or anything, a man just makes his claim and
somebody has to counter his claim. We didnt write the constitution/bill of rights/ charter etc.
we werent there. so dont cite the constitution. Since we cant bring in anyone who signed
the constitution etc. to verify testify under oath, to what that document means. To cite that
doc were not a party to is insane.
Imagine your kid coming up to you saying the constitution says I can stay up past 9pm
youll laugh at him. Hes under your domestic jurisdiction, in your house. Not the
constitution.

Lawyers are allowed to use the constitution because they cannot voice their opinion, they
can only uphold a position from a higher entity than themselves.

A man can be a judge, but a judge cant be a man.

Just file your paperwork and let that speak for itself.

390 | P a g e

Understanding federal courts

Federal means: to pledge. A contract, an agreement. I pledge that Ill show up at the
pledged place to meet this man over this matter. I pledge to meet you at this court in a civil
matter.

Smith court meet AT queens bench. Theyll modify it to FAMILY court meet IN queens
bench. This will screw us over.

We must be very aware of our paper work and if theyre being changed.

Authenticated certified complete copy of a case file to date. If its stylized as an

administrative court file (federal/district/family court) then we write back Im not addressing
this court I did not move my claim in this court why is this court trespassing in my court?
how do you believe that the US district court has any right to be in the district court? If you
have a claim against me get your own case file. Is this not a public court house? Where two
people from different states can meet? So is there a reason you wont allow me to see the
jury and let the jury hear my claim? Is there a reason why you deny me access to this public
building?

Call the judge by his first name. hes not my judge, hes not my magistrate/honour, he was
assigned as magistrate by the US district court, I didnt assign him. I asked him if he would
like to be the magistrate of the lentz court, so I have to presume he does not want to. So he
has nothing to do with the lentz court and the lentz court has nothing to do with the US
district court. (no affiliation)

Payment options for filing a claim

Your claim is private between you and whomever while youre doing your administrative
process and settle the matter..
But once you file your claim with the clerk and she gives u a case number, its public.

391 | P a g e

Say to the court clerk i require to file a case in the public court house and show that the
other side has been served.
clerk says civil or criminal
Reply i dont know about civil or criminal i just know this man done me wrong and under
the common law i have the right to use this court house to have this matter heard and tried
before the jury
They respondent has 21 days to respond so anytime shortly after that i require a jury to be
seated and would appreciate it greatly if you could get me an empty room for the trial .
She say it cost $80
You can work out a payment plan or
You can use the courts are free to the King and his subjects KL says but i would rather pay
that have anybody says they did anything for free for me as there is always something
attached to it..

How to avoid a trial by ambush

Summons should have the entire case (which there should be a complaint or claim)
attached to it this is a common tactics of the clerks they will keep this info from a
defendant.. press the issue and get them on the record saying there is no more paperwork
showing up at the trial.. they will throw u under the bus.. they will magically give u the rest
or be held liable.. because u have them on the record and there better not be anything new
on the day we show up to court.. u have to remember that evil walk around us!!! Thye need
to give u a case with a suit inside of it..
If it went to court and they showed up wth that paperwork you would tell the judge that it
was inadmissible as u were not given any of the documents when i asked the clerk. As a
judge he should know that any time you summons someone to court they must be given full
disclosure!! Just tell them u got it on tape that the clerk say there is nothing more in the file..

Now if the prosecutors doesnt show up? There will be a order placed for an arrest warrant
for them to show and will be dragged in before this court to answer to it..

392 | P a g e

If we accept the fines and swear to pay a dollar a month till infinity.. cant they come after all
that i have in terms of inheretence for my kids if i die because i still owe them? Do we place
a lien to protect our selves next or a trust? I dont want ot take that debt into the next life..i
prefer to move for a dischargewhat do you think karl?

If you went to uses Hale V. Hinckle ..just ask are u hale or hinckle..well that is a different
case and different circumstance that they may be kinf of similar but they are different..so
lets focus on this case and its particularsthis court is not interested in what people said in
1902..at that trial one of the contestants may have stuck his tounge out at the judge and
thats is what did it..we dont know? so lets not use it!!

If a judge at the beging call him by his name ..man to man conversation with him.. to be
clear as a man to man conversation you want to be called your honr or judge but now that i
am calling you your homnr but know that i am only talking to you as a man so when i say
your honor you know i am only talking to you as a man
Section 8-Judgementsmortgage, border crossing, liens, bonds, warrants in deb,
judgement collection and odds and ends & WEED. 13pgs

What is ARMS?
Anything that a man wears for his defense, or takes in his hands, or uses in his anger, to
cast at or strike at another. Co. Litt. 1616, 162a; State v. Buzzard, 4 Ark. 18. This term, as it
Is used in theconstitution, relative to the right of citizens to bear arms, refers to the arms of
a militiaman or soldier, and the word is used in its military sense. The arms of the infantry
soldier are the musket and bayonet; of cavalry and dragoons, the sabre, holster pistols, and
carbine; of the artillery, the field-piece, siegegun, and mortar, with side arms. The term, in
this connection, cannot be made to cover such weapons as dirks, daggers, slung-shots,
sword- canes, brass knuckles, and bowieknives. These are not military arms. English v. State,
35 Tex. 476, 14 Am. Rep. 374; Hill v. State, 53 Ga. 472; Fife v. State, 31 Ark. 455, 25 Am.
Rep. 556; Andrews v. State, 3 Heisk. (Tenn.) 170, 8 Am. Rep. 8; Aymette v. State, 2 Humph.
(Tenn.) 154. Arms, or coat of arms, signifies insignia, i. e., ensigns of honor, such as were

393 | P a g e

formerly assumed by soldiers of fortune, and painted on their shields todistinguish them; or
nearly the same as armorial bearings, (q. v.)

Your signature didnt create the money..your signature and their signature and the terms and
condition created the wealth.. say the mortgage is $1,000,000 lets replace that creation or
contract for a $1 million and convert it into a diamond ring i gave the bank( the $1 mill
mortgage contract they hold) so i pay them monthly for that diamond.. i excpect at the end
of the terms that i will get my diamond back so it can stop being used aganst me but what
the banks are doing is from almost day one under their power of attourney term in the
contract have gone and sold your mortgage without u knowing it well then why are u
paying the bank? Should nt u be paying the holder in due course, which is the person
holding your diamond?
Thats the trick u want to pay the holder in due course because when ur done u want your
diamond back and the bank will not be able to produce it..so u will be able to stop paying
the bankbut i am sure the holder in due course does still have a beef!!! Not sure what to
do with that

look into master status on license...

Remind boarderguards that ur are moving at ur leisure and not in a commercial capacity
because it please me to do so i dont need paper work or licenses to move..
Universal Declaration of Human Rights - the United Nations 1948 .Article 13.
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the
borders of each state.

(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to
his country.

State: an organized political community living under a single system of government

394 | P a g e

Dont forget about being a valuable member of society.because they will be the people
you will call upon as character witness!!
Make sure when u get them to RELINQUISH a bond for the amount you say is fair and you
have had the bond verified and at another location or in escrow and then and only then can
they come in
they could come in with the bond and potentially leave with that bond saying you wanted a
bond but you didnt say for how long? and they could strong arm you and leave with it!!
holding that is key and the only control you have!!

If u should find urself stuck at the parole level you need to go back to the inciting moment of
the incident and make you claim that they never had jurisdiction no way around this fact!!
Go to the beginning!!!

Be careful what you wish for, what is the timeframe for lawful action against a wrong,
understanding contract law, and making it clear that it's your medicine and not marijuana
Karl Lentz explains to Mark the dangers of rescinding a contract made with the court in
regards to his probation. Doing so could result in him going straight back to jail. Karl says
that he's got to go further back to challenge the fact that they never had jurisdiction over
the man because no man is going to come forward and say i did anything wrong in the first
place. He reminds him of Greg who was stubborn and sent a fourth notice in after working
with Karl to have his ankle bracelet taken off immediately, even though Karl warned him
against taking such actions, and he wound up straight back in jail. Public servants are there
to carry out man's wishes so be careful what you wish for. Karl refers Mark back to the
earlier part in his talkshoe where he speaks about the CROWN taking you into a CROWN
court with CROWN lawyers and a CROWN judge and how he could have used what he said
there as his defence. He goes on to explain that if it was him in Mark's situation and the
CROWN wanted to charge him with something he would say that he wants it dealt with
immediately. If a wrong has been committed it must be taken care of right away, and if he
needs to compensate someone he did a wrong to he'll do it now. Not in six months or a year
like in statutory court, but now. If they say that's not how we do things around here, then
you move your claim against them right away. Like a man in Canada did. He was charged
and arrested on saturday and came in on monday with the bill for following all of the officer's
orders and they dropped all the charges. Mark says that he may have made an agreement
with the court to do urine tests and all that, but no longer wishes to do that. Karl
recommends that he ask the prosecutor for a trial because at that point you were processed
without a trial and then bring yiur claim into it and flip it..!!. He explains that even if you
didn't write up the document that got him released on probation, he signed it last and in
contract law that means that it's his document and that he's fully liable for it because he had
the option to make changes to it, but signed it the way that it was. Karl Lentz tells Mark that
he should have made it crystal clear to the prosecutor and judge that he has no marijuana,
just his medicine. If anyone wants to say that he does have marijuana, let them put their

395 | P a g e

hand on a bible and swear that's what he has is marijuana , and that he, a man, is not
allowed to have marijuana.

The cops take your car file a claim against the man who took your car he stole your car..
by way of theft
He will say he is an officer..i dont care if you are an officer what are u doing in another mans
car? Primary and foremost you owe a duty and obligation not to cause harm to your fellow
man. Did you enter that man cars without his permission? Then you are liable!!!

The only time the warrant works without a bond is if were BOUND (if were defendant or
citizen etc.). but because were not part of this big happy family/nation, Ive got my own
family/nation, so I dont recognize your warrant.

Dont file any idols (flags/seals/symbols/crests etc.)

When ur selling your car privately and its $5000.. ask the man to get a bond for $5000 and if
the bond is called in because he didnt pay.. then the bondsman can chase u around. If u
dont do this u could be left with just a few payments on a vehicle and the person could
write your car off and now you have to chase this guy into court toget a judgement and then
a warrant in debt. Save yourself the headache get a bond..
The bondsman sets his own rate.. they have to work that out with the bonds man..

And then u can start accepting payments without using the bank and its can be set up as a
private contract so government cant even look at it.. set fine for disclosing the details of the
contract to anyone other than the two parties signing the contract.

Understanding void judgements

396 | P a g e

Void judgment just means it never existed. That nobody has the jurisdictional capacity to
make such a judgement against I the man. And I cant be held liable. File a void judgement
in the same court the judgement was first placed on us. We basically make a claim that they
had no jurisdictional authority to make such a judgement against I. the other side can
challenge our belief, that the judgement they had rendered against I was a legitimate
judgement and should stand as true. Were asking the same judge that he has no jurisdiction
over us.

Dont play around with void judgements, dont do appeal courts. Pull them into the court of
record with a claim.

Presscopy hearing - Dont use this termjust use the word order or just notice the individual
and ask him to answer to your claim.
ie. tell the clerk that i would like to place a notice with the court i would like for you to
summons the defendant to appear and explain why he should or shouldnt appear let him
demur let him answer send him a noticelook dude u stepped on my toes here is the bill
see exhibit a ( the hospital bill) here is the itemized statement bill see exhibit b and i want
compensation of this much money see exhibit c ( how much you want)
it is also a preliminary hearing a week before the trial..this is where one sits in the judges
chambers and work out the rules and claims and arguments.
presscopy is an old term its more like a demur

Demur
DEMUR, verb intransitive [Latin To stay or delay.]
1. To stop; to pause; to hesitate; to suspend proceeding; to delay determination or
conclusion.
On receiving this information, the minister demurred, till he could obtain further instructions.
2. In law, to stop at any point in the pleadings, and rest or abide on that point in law for a
decision of the cause. Thus, the defendant may demur to the plaintiffs declaration, alledging
it to be insufficient in law; the plaintiff maydemur to the defendants plea, for a like reason.
DEMUR, verb transitive To doubt of.

397 | P a g e

DEMUR, noun Stop; pause; hesitation as to the propriety of proceeding; suspense of

proceeding or decision.
All my demurs but double his attacks.

How to handle a lien

If one feels someone has placed a lien on you in error. One can require a hearing and they
can make their presentment to the court
if someone says u have to pay child support. write back saying that you only have access to
only 30 dollars a month and if there is anything else of value in which you will accept as
payment for the debt.
(this make u stay in honor)
In which 1. U claim is true 2. And that you believe i owe to you and now you are claiming is
past due.

Anyone comes at you telling you that you owe a debt.. you say what you can honestly pay
the best u can do..and they have to accept thatbecause to do more would be to cause
harm to i the man

This will stop garninshment this will stop warrant in debt.. all debts!!

Or you can conditionally accept upon proof of a verifiable claim

398 | P a g e

How to reclaim your status as a man

File our notice of error: We made a mistake of answering as a defendant before, because we
do not have the capacity. We were just made aware that were not the defendant. Im sorry I
wasted the courts time and energy. At once time I thought it was a great benefit to be a
defendant, at present I maintain that I hold constructive possession of said article,
constructive possession (one time I believed it was in my best interest to possess this thing),
now its become constructive trespass ( I wish it to be gone but it wont leave).
I on this date believe Ive erred back on (date). For I believe I was in a state of disequilibrium
and incapacitation to have made such a wish, for the go between is to bind my person with
said article, so today august.19th I wish for the immediate removal of said article from
property and I.

From this date after whomever he or she sayeth said article is to remain about thy person
will be the causal agent of trespass to property and will be held liable for monetary
compensation for damages. From day forth (date) whomever comes and says that that
article is to remain on my person on my property will be the cause of trespass on me and my
property and will be held liable for compensation.

a man is a bondsman holding the bond for the defendant

Like u holding the liability for your child
The quiet title is if you want to claim abandoned property effectively. Just to make sure its
free and clear before putting a lot of sweat equity into something only to find out someone
else has a claim on it.

Trial of the regicides

Karl learned from this movie how to answer properly in court by watching the attourney who
was on trial was the only one would answer the court correctly by requiring leave of court
and a pen and piece of paper write down his answer and place his proper answer before the
court..WRITE YOUR RESPONSE AND SIGN IT!!
when u say i require leave the judge will ask How long?

399 | P a g e

Remember only a man can require means To demand; to ask, as of right and by authority.
lawyers request because of their diminished capacity and status..lol

Irreparable..stay away form this word..it means they cant fix the problem with monetary
compensation because it would be futile. Stay awy from the four syllabels words

The quiet title is if you want to claim abandoned property effectively. Just to make sure its
free and clear before putting a lot of sweat equity into something only to find out someone
else has a claim on it.

How to cross a border as a man

Passport (at border patrol on a flight you have a contract) and drivers license are the same
deal if an agent ask u for ones passport.. reply with the classic do you require me to have
a passport to move form piece of land to another? So you as a man are going to interfere
with my right to move from this point on planet earth to over that gate to the other point on
this planet earth?
Rental cars have contracts and operate under contracts that require driver licenses
diminishing your capacity.
They may sauy the DHS is preventing youwell you say if i a man in this common law land
drag this matter before the court your telling me the DHS will testify that i cant cross!!?? And
attorneys cant make a claim in that courtremember the plaintiff must appear and tell me i
cant go from point a to point b because i am causing harmwho am i in the DHS causing
harm too? Who is incurring financial loss?

Just claim the man status and opt out

Understanding a common law lien

Common law lien does not have to be recorded..its in your head and if any one ask where it
is recorded reply with i will press it on the record wherever i am summons to appear

400 | P a g e

It is the most superior lien you will ever have

This works well for protecting against credit card companies macys things of that nature
because you know they are never going to be able to press the record and the man will be
able too

How to remove a misdemeanor and the need for a third party impartial witness
By having a misdemeanor places on our name its causing I the man harm. If you dont
remove it Im gonna have to make a claim against the man whos in control of that. If
someones doing something/not doing something according to their policies and procedures,
and its doing I the man harm, then sure it might be their policies and rules put there for
benefit for society and general good, is still doesnt negate the fact that its causing I the
man harm, and that you need to cease and desist immediately. Misdemeanors info can be
found at vital statistics, so file our notice with them first. If they respond back with you
need a court order, at that point we pull the man out of the person and say BOBBY at this
point youre telling me NO right? You a man and you understand that this is causing me
financial loss but you dont care. So now youre making yourself liable for causing me
injury/financial loss. Is that how youre going to stand in court? Im giving you fair warning, is
this your story? Are you just gonna sit there and follow orders knowing that youre hurting a
man? You have to stop. Youre intentionally doing wrong. You cant hurt a man just because
someone told you to, and Im telling you youre hurting I a man!

Seizure is a good thing

Seized means all lawful remdies were exhausted..ie trial by jury happened and then seizure
to place..so its a good thing
Stay away from Seized use robbed me of property and require the immediate restoration of
property. See exhibit A

SEIZE, verb transitive

1. To fall or rush upon suddenly and lay hold on; or to gripe or grasp suddenly. The tiger
rushes from the thicket and seizes his prey. A dog seizes an animal by the throat. The
hawk seizes a chicken with his claws. The officer seizes a thief.
2. To take possession by force, with or without right.
At last they seize The scepter, and regard not David's son. Milton.

401 | P a g e

3. To invade suddenly; to take hold of; to come upon suddenly; as, a fever seizes a patient
And hope and doubt alternate seize her soul. Pope.
4. To take possession by virtue of a warrant or legal authority. The sherif seized the debtor's
goods; the whole estate was seized and confiscated. We say, to arrest a person,
to seize goods.
5. To fasten; to fix. In seaman's language, to fasten two ropes or different parts oof one rope
together with a cord.
To be seized of, to have possession; as a griffin seized of his prey. A B was seized and
possessed of the manor of Dale.
To seize on or upon, is to fall on and grasp; to take hold on; to take possession.

Notice of recission
Rescission is an equitable remedy and is discretionary. A court may decline to rescind a
contract if one party has affirmed the contract by his action (see Long v Lloyd [1958] 1 WLR
753) or a third party has acquired some rights or there has been substantial performance in
implementing the contract.

I a woman (name) claim that there exists a contract also known as a safety plan between
the parties of (name) and Harrisburg social services department see exhibit A; I declare
henceforth from this day (date) the world is to take notice that said contract 1) provides no
benefit to neither I nor my person and is a causal source of harm 2) it lacks the capacity to
compel performance from I or my person 3) it lacks the power to force I or my person to be
bound to perform under any and all of its terms and conditions.

Herein let it be known that if there be any man or woman who wishes to make his or her
claim known that said contract has capacity to bind I or my person let them come forth now
with a verifiable claim and deny said notice or forever hold their peace

Yes theres a contract, at one time I thought it was a good contract, now 1 I dont see any
benefit, 2 theres no one on this planet who can force/compel me to perform, 3 no one can
bind me to it. if someone believes they can bind me to it, let him make his presence known
to court.

402 | P a g e

Who thinks they can harm a man and get away with it?

Make a claim. Give the public servant notice, putting them on notice, back off and do your
job public servant, I do not require your services at this time. Let me alone

Affidavits

Affidavits are just paperwork thats filed but not sworn in on the record. It maybe one day
one man or woman may show up and verify en viva voce and press the record, until then its
just the written word of man, not the spoken word of man. So its not true. And can be
denied. If Im ordered to speak this into court I will.

Thats why visa cards can give affidavits. If we ever see a 2D entity on affidavit, we just have
to say I wish for the man or woman who sworn that affidavit to come to court and speak
this into the record. If no one comes forward then it is untrue. This document has no spine,
no backbone, it wont stand up in court.

affidavit is their mystical magical word, lets not use it. its legalese. For us, its a CLAIM.
We dont want them to mistake us as one of them, by using their language. Always claim
ignorance when they throw legalese at us. an affi what? Daffy duck?, oh you mean a
statement that is true? You mean a claim?

Non acceptance of your best effort payments means the debt no longer exists

Do our best effort to pay, they decline it, case closed. I tried to pay, you refused to take my
payment, see exhibit A, B, C etc.
The UCC says its too but its not ours too use..U may [cf.]
What else do they want i sent a payment that they didnt accept it.

403 | P a g e

Case closed there is no more controversy..

They are trying to collect something that doesnt exist..the debt is gone because as soon as
they said they refused to accept ISABELLA DESANTOS
ones payment then its game over. One has the right to be let alone.

Motion for sanctions

This is legalese.. this is to maintain status quo .. the existing order to be held. And claim its
frivolous and place sanctions for more silly behaviour.

Order a lien or garnishment to be lifted

You get a lien
U dont know this person who lien you up
You write i am going to require u to come to court and explain why you put the lien on me in
the flesh as i have the right to face my accuser before the court where the lien has been
recorded.
You write
i order the lien to be lifted; if there is a man who wants to make a counter order and said the
lien not be lifted let him come before the court now or forever hold their peace.
This holds true for garnishments.
You have the right to have a trial and face the man or woman who has liened or a garnished
salary thy property.

Using a process server

It is worth the money using a process server. They do great documents, look professional
etc.

404 | P a g e

How to restore your weed from the police

Police officer take your property [weed] say i a man require the immediate return of
property, unles u bob(policeman) have a vested interest in it do you have a receipt proving
u bought some of this?or did the county buy some of this?or you think i didnt pay taxes on
it? Show me your vested interest in it??!! Because i would be glad to compensate anyone
with a vested interest
Tell the cop if you have a vested interest in this property bring a claim forward.
They may say its a controlled substance show your ignorance and lack of understanding
of their words and terms right form the beginning and say yes it was in my control in a
plastic bad in my car until this man robbed its was under my control
how was it not under control was it out there in the public causing a menace?
it was under my control not out in public and under my authority my power
it wasnt out there in the public hurting anybody was it?
thats my property

if any bank try to foreclose on any more people in new York state, the attorneys are gonna
have to come forth under oath and affirmation in open court, and swear that everything that
the bank is saying is true. And any attorney is going to be held liable to damages

Private contracts, and declaratory judgements

Small clause in contract to keep it private Anybody who brought this into a court has to pay
a million dollars to the other party. They want to settle this? It must be settled in a private
education process, not public.

If the party doesnt show up, get a summary judgement.

In law, a summary judgment (also judgment as a matter of law) is ajudgment entered
by a court for one party and against another party summarily, i.e., without a full trial. Such
a judgment may be issued on the merits of an entire case, or on discrete issues in that
case.

405 | P a g e

No one can force anyone in a private contract to disclose anything publicly. Nobody can
force somebody to disclose the information of a private contract into the public regardless of
what that contract is about. No power on this planet can force open a private contract where
the parties involved dont want it opened. i.e. marriage contract, the state can intervene
because the state is part of the contract through marriage license.

If we have the ability to be there at the beginning to write the contract, put severe penalties
into the contract for disclosure.
If we have a controversy that truly exists, between I and someone who really doesnt want to
come forward and get involved, were just going to propose this complaint where we just
whine about something to a man in a black robe, and the man in the black robe just says if
this controversy ever appears in this court, and if what youre saying is true and accurate,
HERE is what this court would decide: this ruling is not binding on anybody, its just an
opinion of what this court may do if these parties were to appear before us.
Then we can take that and go to the other side to scare them, this is what would happen if I
were to sue you, so lets settle this privately

Call their bluff, require the original note (contract for mortgage), the contract is the law,
bring the law before the court. Offer to pay in full if the note can be produced. Dont accept
a COPY, require the wet-ink original. The copy will have all the routing numbers and fiken
numbers are redacted (blacked out).
Redact
rdakt/Submit
verb
past tense: redacted; past participle: redacted
edit (text) for publication.
"a confidential memo which has been redacted from 25 pages to just one paragraph"
censor or obscure (part of a text) for legal or security purposes.
We can go to the attorney general or the bank where are those numbers? What did you do
with it? I want those numbers to see what was been done with this note through the
commercial process to know what youve done with it. did you monetize it? did you
securitize it? what did you do with the note? Who has possession of it? has anyone made a
claim on it to the insurance company? If so have the IRS or Treasury Dept. claimed a loss?
Dereliction of duty claim

406 | P a g e

So government worker isnt doing their job well file a claim..

they have a duty and obligation in which they ascribe too. This lady named Susy xxxx .
Suzy xxxx has been in dereliction of duty in which she is failing to perform a service or
function in which society pays her to perform. By her failure to perform in a duty in which
she is acquiring public funds to do her job she is causing i a man harm

When u drag them before a court u ask her before a jury how she can collect income from
the public and not perform the job asked of her?

U go to small claims court but dont file a small claim..dont let them minimize ones claim..it
is just a claim!!

Dont call anyone..write letters!!! Use a process sever to even serve letters..

If ur car gets damaged because of pot holes. U can sue the city for being derelict in their
duties!

Ascribe: verb (used with object), ascribed, ascribing.

1.to credit or assign, as to a cause or source; attribute; impute:
The alphabet is usually ascribed to the Phoenicians.
2.to attribute or think of as belonging, as a quality or characteristic:
They ascribed courage to me for something I did out of sheerpanic.
DERELICT, adjective [Latin To leave.] Left; abandoned.
DERELICT, noun
1. In law, an article of goods, or any commodity, thrown away, relinquished or abandoned by
the owner.
2. A tract of land left dry by the sea, and fit for cultivation or use.

407 | P a g e

- Process servers, and using a box on your paperwork

Use a process server pay $50 and stop messing around.. using a box around your
documents is to say nothing is to enter this doc and nothing is to leave this document!! Its a
line of demarcation. No more marks, its trapped, its sealed. U could fill the entire thing with
squiggly lines if u didnt trust the people..
U can also put squiggly lines going down so that if anybody adds to the document u can see
the wrote through the line..
Everything is negotiable..

IF UR AR CHARGED WITH UTTERING A FORGED INSTRUMENT FROM A PUBLIC TRUST ALL U

HAVE TO DO IS SYA IT WAS DONE FROM A PRIVATE COMMON LAW TRUST AND SINCE IT
DOESNT HAVE TO BE REGISTERED AND THE BENEFICIARIES DONT HAVE TO BE NOTIFIED
YOU CAN GET OUT OF It.None is claiming harm or loss or injury in common law!!

Dealing with garnished wages

Send a letter to the pay roll lady and ask for the court order if they dont have a court
order then u make a claim against the company and sue.. because they have no right to
release to anyone without a court order.. so they are liable. They cannot discharge your
property without consent! That was a contract between u and themand u have never
allowed any third party interloper to administrate in my property

extra goodie...The City of London has a unique political status, a legacy of its uninterrupted
integrity as a corporate city since the Anglo-Saxon period and its singular relationship with
the Crown.

The monarchy of the United Kingdom, commonly referred to as the British monarchy,
is the constitutional monarchy of the United Kingdom and its overseas territories. The
monarch's title is "King" (male) or "Queen" (female). The current monarch and head of state,
Queen Elizabeth II, ascended the throne on the death of her father, King George VI, on 6
February 1952.

408 | P a g e

This basically shows us that someone has titled The Queen which means she has been
crowned having somebody else has crowned her and you look no further than the crown and
who is the crown well who titled her last look at her coronation. She is the monarch of the
crown but not the crown itself!!!
The Queen having returned to her Chair, (her Majesty having already on Tuesday, the 4th
day of November, 1952, in the presence of the two Houses of Parliament, made and signed
the Declaration prescribed by Act of Parliament), the Archbishop standing before her shall
administer the Coronation Oath, first asking the Queen,

so vatican titled her queen and that makes them the power. as they are the king and queen
makers!!!

London is a city state of who?? ROME

rome is money and government that operates under the crown is operating under
commercial and that is admiralty law (canada and usa clearly do both are common law
nations)

The powers generally understood to belong to the Attorney General at common law have
been summarized as follows: 1st. To prosecute all actions, necessary for the protection and
defense of the property and revenues of the crown.

409 | P a g e

Man, a Creature endued with reason. Used in a lose sense, for any one;

a male-child grown to ripe age, and full stature; or a name of sex set against woman,
Act.8,3.

This word [Man] cometh of the Hebrew ish, in respect of heat, valour, nobleness and
dignity, whereby man excelleth; also of Adm, which signifieth earth. This latter is given to
the baser sort, and the former to the noble sort of people, Psal.49.2. & 4.3. see Isa.2.9.

Also note, that man is sometime called enosh, which is, a doleful sorrowful man, a wretched
one, to put us in mind of our misery, as Adam noteth our mortality, that we are earth, &c.
Psal.8.4, & 9.20. where the Original word is Enosh, that is, silly or sorry man.

Both man and woman; better sex used for both sexes. Psal.1.1. Blessed in the man.

One complete and full of true knowledge of God, and of holiness, without any least want or
defect. Eph.4.13. To meet together to a perfect man. In 1 Cor.13.11. It signifieth one of a
constant and perfect age in Christ. Also, Eph.4.13. Where the Church is likened unto one
man of ripe age, to declare the unity thereof, and that every member of the Church feeling it
self unperfect, must strive to full perfection, which doctrine every one should apply himself;

The body which is but one part of a man. 2 Cor.4.16. 'Though our outward man perish.' (see
temporal and eternal man)

410 | P a g e

Here then is the great difference betwixt the Temporal and the Eternal, That the one is the
end, and the other but the means; the eternal is the end of man, but of the temporal, man
himself is the end. The eternal is man's utmost perfection, and his perpetual happiness : the
temporal only to be made use of, for obtaining the eternal; so as the eternal, being our end,
is to be loved and desired for itself, the temporal to be made no account of, but as it may
conduce to the obtaining of the eternal.

Interloper
INTERLO'PER, noun One who runs into business to which he has no right; one who interferes
wrongfully; one who enters a country or place to trade without license.

Dont ask if u can take pictures u are a man u dont ask this is your castle!!
When asked do you have any Canadian or US money?
We say why would I have bobs or suzies or anyone elses money in my possession? If I had
someones money Id give it back to them. I only have my own property.
They ask how much money do you believe is here?
(dodge it like a politician, dont answer their question, answer the question we wished that
they wouldve asked)
We say all I know is that I exist, and only God knows what is true. I dont know whats on
that table. The only truth I know is God. How much money do YOU believe is there?
Dont confess, try to bring out the man. Keep it funny.

411 | P a g e

When u do get your claim in place an order asking her to show who the claimant is? (point to
you acknowledging you the man because only a man can make a claim)
Simply invite the mortage company to your court and they will know the rules of
engagement which are to produce the original wet ink signature note.
U dont have to explain the rules to themif they dont produce it thats there problem
because you are going to be requiring to see that original note!!

- Foreclosures

What debt? The debt is paid?

That places the burden on the banks to show they have incurred a loss..they cant!!
say you paid of the mortage ages ago.. they will say thats not true because this piece of
paper say its not
reply let me see that piece of paper grow vocal cords and say that in open court? (you have
the right to face your accuser) ask the lawyer if they will verify in open court that you owe
them? the lawyers will say no way

the other more honorable strategy is to pay them what you can pay? Make them an
offer..and u know if they refuse your best offer!!!! it will be your house..but stay honorable
offer again your best and if they still which i doubt they will..but if not take the house and
get out of there

the other tactic is if you blow this banking system they will come back and want land rights
or they will just bugger off to Africa and level the playing field out and turn America back in
a third world nation..( Speculation but food for thought when using this stuff) ( i personally
would like to see it without the 1 % in controlwe might be pleasantly surprised)

If you have exhausted all remedies with them to pay your best effort!! Dont forget your
equitable claim for all the sweat equity you placed in the home for security of the building
and up keep.

412 | P a g e

If a bank is trying to sell your house well they are in essence saying the own the house
because you cant sell something you dont own.. so then this is when you send them the bill
for all the up keep!!

If they want to be owner and make you squatterwell turn yourself into a security guard
and bill em!!

When u file a clain your putting there complaint as exhibit A and exhibt B your taken
property and if its intangible like oyur reputation maybe placing an affidavit stating that your
reputation was sullied by this act also get a witness to testify as to the changes that have
happened to you as a result of this incident.like u lost clients!! And show the cause and
effectget a witness!!show the actual loss!!

If your reputation was sullied you better prove itbring in the someone who wouldnt work
with you after the fact!! Dont bring in no spread sheet because that speculation and
circumstantial!!you need the voice of man Bring in the party that left you!!

So if you have employees just fire them without a reason!! The moment u have a reason
they have a lawsuit to counter it!! Dont give them something to counter!!

The banks probably have actuaries predicting when is the best time to pull this mortage
scam off again like they did 60 years ago because people are forgetful

Why dont drug dealers ever find out the game all the way to the end? The play it up until
the cops arresting them? then what? Youre at the mercy of a lawyer and the system!?
Unless ur jonh gotty

413 | P a g e

People need to read their contracts and learn to modify them!!! Employeer give you a
contract u modify and send it back and make them not even see what they signed the
names too when he signs his contract and doesnt realize that if he tries to sue you that
the contract screws the company instead!!

How much money do you believe is there? they are trying to get you to convict yourself!!!
Avoid the land mine!!

whats in front of you is my property and i know that there isnt any other man here that can
make a claim for that property
They could just take the money and beat the crap out of you but some will play the game
honorably!

Regarding bonds and mortgage

If you have a mrogtage with a bank and you have used those promissory notes to pay off
your debtmake sure after they have received the payment to send them a letter with your
needs
Hello bank,

i require for my records that the payment has been tendered in full and that there is no
longer an outstanding debt.

thanks
or ask them if Joe ( or whomever is the man or woman) debt has been satisfied yes or no? if
no why do they believe the debt is not satisfied after you sent them the following
intrustment exhibit a [the promissory note] ..it is really important to me so please get back
to me immediately.
it hurts not to ask so ask!!!
make sure you send them a blank envelop with a blank piece of paper with an envelope with
a stamp on it..

this is also a practice to be used when dealing with correspondence via the courtsjust ask
the clerk to place everytihgn thing including your empty envelope with your address on it

414 | P a g e

back in to a time stamped court envelop and they will send it out in their outgoing box
if you are dealing with several people make sure you sned them all their own personalized
version and cc everyone else.. yes they will get 3 letters of the same letters just with
different names

- Karl's encounter with the Canadian border patrol, and recognizing extortion

Government agents like to arrest u without pressing charges. Simply let them know u dont
need a rest..
If the insist of giving u a rest u say no that everything that i do form this point forward is
against my will and wishes and u will have to order me to to anything.I am more than willing
to do what ever they want because ur going to get compensated..because ur a man and i
am a man and i have done no wrong.. and two u have a gun..
Ask them after its all said and done did i carry out all your orders? Get a nice yes from them
and recorded it if u can
!!
They have no power over youthey have power over visitors because of the immigration
act so dont take the title of visitor citizen or traveler..always just be a man

Karl thinks human and man is the same thing???

Officer think that immigration act or other acts give them the right but it actually gives them
duties and obligations..not rights to do wat they want over man

Does the immigration say what?? U mean it reads? Did u create it? Do u know what that
means? Do u want to be held liable for this a a man that ur sure it applies to a man?

Show me where the immigration act expressly says u jim smith to touch me robin Mitchell??

415 | P a g e

When making a lawyer your co counsil dont let them speak for you.. most will recuse
themselves..they were only there usually to throw u under the bus..

Some prosecutors want to threaten u saying if you do this now it will be beter thsn if u waut
six months when we are going to do whatever their threart isIF THEY PUT IT IN WRITING
AND TRY TO ALL U DO IS FILE A CLAIM OF EXTORTION
In Canada they put it this extortion in writing. And if u fell for this u file a claim and say u
only acted before of the fear the extortion created
Plus all these deals are false because a judge can turn around and sentence u whatever they
want

When they are trying to sell your house at an auction make sure you go.. and witness that
you were the highest bidder not the bank and when the lawyer goes and testify differently
because the bank wont appear and no will the lawyer , he will be up poop creek without a
paddle because he will lie that he was at a auction that you and 5 other witness will attest
he wasnt at!!
- Obstruction of justice charges
I have the right to remain silent until I have an attorney present OR I see the charges
brought before me, because I know anything I say right now can be used against me we are
presuming that when the police lights are on we are under arrest. I require to be taken in
front of the magistrate right now, wake him up

If we get charged with obstruction of justice ask them who or what is justice. I didnt see
anyone named Justice that I obstructed. How did I get in the way of him or her? Are you
saying I obstructed a word? Did I obstruct a verb or a noun? If I got in the way of justice, Im
sorry about that. Whos this justice so I can compensate them? I was just moving my
property from point a to point b, and I sure dont like it if someone gets in my way. Show me
the damages that justice incurred from my obstructing him or her. Please specify how much
of his or her justice did I obstruct? Show me the bill of particulars so I can compensate this
justice, and show me how you arrived at those numbers. How can I give you back some
justice? (this is all in writing)

In the court room we are in public domain, so we are under public control. They have
jurisdiction of the area over wrong-doers.

416 | P a g e

Maritime law? What are we on a boat?

Does a snail need a permit to dig? They are self-governed as I am. Order me to speak so I
can be compensated, I dont have to talk to any man I dont want to.

If ur the primary lien holder..ur first in line first in timeso ask for the debt so that u can use
it to collect on your debtthis will freeze them in line..because ur goig to have the lien on
your sister property which they want behind ur established lien with her..go to the records
office and make it official..ur beats there and u still remain to be paid $1 million before they
get paid..u ll testify in any court and ur sister will back it up..so how can they get you if u
block them
Sherriff must execute warrants on debt or they become liable for the debt because they are
perceived to be working with the person
If your government has tresites with another nation they can extridict youbut notice that
native amiercans never get extridicted because there is no treaty allowing such extridictions
of their people whne they run into the reserves!!

If u owe a ridiculous debt just make a payment plan that wont harm you!!!

When asked do you have any Canadian or US money?

We say why would I have bobs or suzies or anyone elses money in my possession? If I had
someones money Id give it back to them. I only have my own property.
They ask how much money do you believe is here?
(dodge it like a politician, dont answer their question, answer the question we wished that
they wouldve asked)
We say all I know is that I exist, and only God knows what is true. I dont know whats on
that table. The only truth I know is God. How much money do YOU believe is there?
Dont confess, try to bring out the man. Keep it funny.

417 | P a g e

Wheres the law that says I a man have to confess and tell you everything I did? Wheres it
say that I a man have to take pen and paper and confess all money I made this year? I didnt
say CITIZEN, I didnt say TAXPAYER, I said MAN

Collection agencies just do the same thinglook for a man or woman and then you are
good
ie who is the man or woman who is trying to communicate with me?

Do sweat anybody listening to your phone calls in prison u just tell them to testify in court
as a manbob( guard listening in) do u say that me talking on the phone caused u some
harm? He should say NO the united states doesnt allow respond with the united states
who is the united states a man or woman???or can u show me the injury harm or loss to the
united states?

If charged with assault apologize..

An application form for a credit card is not a contract! A form can not have duel purposes as
every form has to have its only individual capacity. There is no such thing as a Dual prupose
form in good law.. so simply ask for the acredit agreement that u know u have never
signed and can never produce and will send u bugger off letter i require that u send us the
authorization for the standing order
Much like insurance companies..they run a rackets of not actually providing u with insurance
protection because no contract was ever produced now u can ask for the contract ( dont
stop paying or youll be in dishonor) and bring the insurance company to court if they dont
produce the contract because u are actually driving without insurance and they will say they
cant find the contract when ur insurance gets to crazy for them use the same lawful play
back at them and hold them liable for not providing a service and collecting money from
your bank accountgive them 14 days to pay it back or this is Fraudulent Practices!! So
how ever long u have had insurance and paid it without getting the service u ask for the
lump sum of it back
KL PERSON
KL: a person is a man, no, no, a person is a man, a man isnt a person. A man could be on
Gilligans island, and live on a private island and hes got no duty, hes got no title ascribed

418 | P a g e

to him in which he can be imposed in which he fails to perform that duty. No. a person is a
man, but no, a man does not have to be a person.
Guest: a person is a man.
KL: wait, wait, like a man can be a judge, but a judge is definitely a man person. Do you
see what Im saying? A person is a man, a judge is a man, Guest: I heard on like one of your shows before, I think you are talking about like that show,
what you are saying there. But it comes down to what you believe. Right?
----------------------------------------------KL: I had to do that when Bali went to court. Because he kept saying hes a man, and they
kept saying is the person known as, and he kept saying hes a man. Is the man is the person
Oh, shit. They were like fine if the person is failing will not appear at this time, * they
were like, like whens the next date on the docket, it was oh, hell no. Im jumping up and Im
going to say no, the person known as Bali Mann is here. I said I aint playing this fing game.
I said, Im not coming back to merry old England man, in 3 months, 6 months, I aint doing it,
we are getting it done today. So we jumped up or I jumped up and said can I aid and assist
this court? They were like who the hell are you? I said, oh Im from the United States, Im
here to aid and assist the court blah, blah, blah. And then I just basically said he is a person,
there is a person known as Bali Mann in court today, and I said, but I said I think, Im trying
to remember what her title was but she was the lady (legal adviser probably) I dont know,
Bali probably knows what her title was. But (maybe a legal adviser if it was magistrate court,
should be a legal adviser) Well, ya, there was a jurist that sat up high, and a magistrate that
sat on a lower level, ya, so she was either a court clerk, right, she was somebody. But all I
remember is when I, he is a person, but the only problem is he is not a person within your
legal society. I said you are not following me are you. Okay, a person is a man, who owes a
duty and an obligation * to society and if he fails within those duties or obligations within
that society, that society may impose upon him. I said the only problem is he does not
believe that he is a person within the legal society, he is in a society but it is not the legal
society. And this is a legal matter before this court today, and this court has no jurisdiction
over the man. Yes they have jurisdiction over the person, but he is here to inform the court
that he is not that person. So, the lady is like okay, Ill go tell the judge all this. And ya, tell
him I wrote a law dictionary, so * just doesnt think Im some crack pot *.
You are there in person but not a person to their legal society. I am a person to society, but
not to your society. This is a legal matter, I am not a person within the legal society. And if
you give me a chance Ill explain it to the court today. And like I said the judge knows what
the f Im doing.

KL: what Bali was doing in court was hysterical. It was funny, he got the one trick, pulled the
rabbit out of the hat. And then the judge want and said something else, and Bali, ah, he said
Im not a person Im a man. And Bali, again he pulled the rabbit out of the hat. And then the
judge said something else. Had nothing to do with the answer that Bali was coming up with
next. And Bali, pulled the rabbit out of the hat, again. And its like, Bali go to the next trick,
go to the next trick, go to the next trick. And he didnt know how to do anything other than

419 | P a g e

pull the rabbit out of the hat. Its like holy shit. Its like oh dude, he doesnt know what the f
hes fing freezing up here. And then thats when I jumped up. And I said may aid and assist
this court. And the court clerk said and who are you? I said Im the next friend, Im the next
of next friend for the man before you at this time. And they said hum, and how to wish to
aid and assist this court? I said youre looking for the person known as Bali raj Mann? Yes.
The person known as Bali raj Mann is now present before this court. Bali is like
looking at me, like no, I thought I was only man. I said shut the f up, I got this. I said Im not
coming back to fing merry old England cause this guy is about to fing reschedule this trial
in six months, and I aint coming fing back. Its over today. Im going the f home. I didnt
come all the way over here to postpone this shit. I came over here to finish this fing thing
now. Thats the way I do things, I want it done and I want it done now. Ive got to get back
home, I have too much shit to do. I aint go time to play this fing game with you people. So
the court said how is this person before the court. The person is before the court as well
as the man. The person and the man are both before this fing court. HOW IS THAT?
If a person has duty and obligation according to his rank within a society, which he has
certain duties and obligations which he must behold, and if he fails within those duties that
he ascribe to, the society may fing impose upon him, such as penalties, fines, jail terms,
death, whatever. The only problem is the person in whom you seek, is not a member
of the legal society. And I believe you have a legal claim, legal criminal complaint
against this man before the court this day. Yes. Well this man is an idiot at
legalese, he does not speak legalese, he is not a member of the legalese (LEGAL
SOCIETY), nor is any of the other individuals in this court summons to appear today a
member of your society. Thank God their skin is brown. Its going to make my job a lot easier
to prove to this court, that they are not proper Englishmen. They have no duty or obligation
to act in any way, in any manner your society subscribes, cause they do not ascribe to your
society, because they are Punjabi. I guarantee you if they violated or committed any crime
against the Punjabi society, they will be dealt as such. But is said you have no jurisdiction,
control of Punjabi. Because he is not of your society. They are idiots when it comes to
legalese. But yes the persons you seek before the court, but persons of the Punjabi society,
not of the legal British, UK, crown society. Yes, they are persons, but not to your society, not
to their society, but to their own society to which they have done no wrong. And I said there
is no man, that is going to come forth to this day and take that stand and testify, today that I
have done anything wrong to any man of any society. Persons yes, man no. and this is a
common law land? Yes. Than they invoke the right to have the fing man come forward move
their fing case against them. And that will never happen. So are they guilty as charged? You
better believe it. But are they guilty of doing anything wrong. No, they owe no debt to no
man. And they have no debt to the crown, because they cant be guilty, they cant hold a
debt to the crown because they dont even know the crown, the rules, the bylaws. They
dont ascribe, theres no document thats going to prove they are a member of the legal
society. (Thats right) So then the judge is like, and who are you again? Its like my name is
Karl Lentz.

Person is a man / man is not a person

Judge is a man / man acts as judge

420 | P a g e

Homeowner's Association issues, your property on someone else's property

u sign youre liable

Section 9- Glossary

421 | P a g e

I found a cool definition of Common Law in a 1765 Dictionary by Nathan Bailey: Common
Law, is either 1. Simply the Law of the Land, without any other addition. 2. The Law more
generally before any Statute was made to alter it. Or, 3. The King's Court, distinguished
from both inferior Courts.
Constitution
CONSTITUTION, noun
1. The act of constituting, enacting, establishing, or appointing.
2. The state of being; that form of being or peculiar structure and connection of parts which
makes or characterizes a system or body. Hence the particular frame or temperament of the
human body is called its constitution We speak of a robust or feeble constitution; a cold,
phlegmatic, sanguine or irritable constitution We speak of the constitution of the air, or other
substance; the constitution of the solar system; the constitution of things.
3. The frame or temper of mind, affections or passions.
4. The established form of government in a state, kingdom or country; a system of
fundamental rules, principles and ordinances for the government of a state or nation. In free
states, the constitution is paramount to the statutes or laws enacted by the legislature,
limiting and controlling its power; and in the United States, the legislature is created, and its
powers designated, by the constitution
5. A particular law, ordinance, or regulation, made by the authority of any superior, civil or
ecclesiastical; as the constitutions of Justinian and his successors.
6. A system of fundamental principles for the government of rational and social beings.
The New Testament is the moral constitution of modern society.

Corporation
CORPORATION, noun A body politic or corporate, formed and authorized by law to act as a
single person; a society having the capacity of transacting business as an individual.
Corporations are aggregate or sole. Corporations aggregate consist of two or more persons
united in a society, which is preserved by a succession of members, either forever, or till the
corporation is dissolved by the power that formed it, by the death of all its members, by surrender of its
charter or franchises, or by forfeiture. Such corporations are the mayor and aldermen of cities, the head
and fellows of a college, the dean and chapter of a cathedral church, the stockholders of a bank or
insurance company, etc. A corporation sole consists of one person only and his successors, as a king or a
bishop.

422 | P a g e

propriety
play
noun propriety \pr-pr--t\
Simple Defi nition of PROPRIETY
Popularity: Top 20% of words

: b e h a v i o r t h a t i s a c c e p t e d a s s o c i a l l y o r m o r a l l y c o rre c t a n d p ro p e r

: t h e s t a t e o r q u a l i t y o f b e i n g c o rre c t a n d p ro p e r

p r o p r i e t i e s : r u l e s o f c o rre c t s o c i a l b e h a v i o r

Full Defi nition of PROPRIETY

plural proprieties
1.

1 o b s o l e t e : t r u e n a t u re

2.

2 o b s o l e t e : a s p e c i a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c : peculiarity

3.

3 : t h e q u a l i t y o r s t a t e o f b e i n g proper o r s u i t a b l e : appropriateness

4.

4 a : c o n f o rm i t y t o w h a t i s s o c i a l l y a c c e p t a b l e i n c o n d u c t o r
s p e e c h b : f e a r o f o ff e n d i n g a g a i n s t conventional r u l e s o f b e h a v i o r
e s p e c i a l l y b e t w e e n t h e s e xe s c p l u r a l : t h e c u s t o m s a n d m a n n e r s
o f polite s o c i e t y

423 | P a g e

Imprison. To put in prison; to confine a person or restrain his liberty, in any way.;
Imprisonment. The act of putting or confining a man in prison. The restraint of a mans
personal liberty; coercion exercised upon a person to prevent the free exercise of his powers
of locomotion.
Ex parte /ks prti/ is a Latin legal term meaning "from (by or for) [the/a] party". An ex
parte decision is one decided by a judge without requiring all of the parties to the
controversy to be present.

Statute
STATUTE, [Latin , to set.]
1. An act of the legislature of a state that extends its binding force to all the citizens or
subjects of that state, as distinguished from an act which extends only to an individual or
company; an act of the legislature commanding or prohibiting something; a positive law.
Statutes are distinguished from common law. The latter owes its binding force to the
principles of justice, to long use and the consent of a nation. The former owe their binding
force to a positive command or declaration of the supreme power. statute is commonly
applied to the acts of a legislative body consisting of representatives. In monarchies, the
laws of the sovereign are called edicts, decrees, ordinances, rescripts, etc.
2. A special act of the supreme power, of a private nature, or intended to operate only on an
individual or company.
3. The act of a corporation or of its founder, intended as a permanent rule or law; as the
statutes of a university.

424 | P a g e

PETI'TION, noun [Latin petitio, from peto, to ask, properly to urge or press.]
1. In a general sense, a request, supplication or prayer; but chiefly and appropriately, a
solemn or formal supplication; a prayer addressed by a person to the Supreme Being, for
something needed or desired, or a branch or particular article of prayer.

no man is your god you give the judge an order as you paid for oyur court and he is your
servant.
And if he gives you an order you hand him a bill..
Deny simple means not true...it doesnt mean they dont accept it..it means they are
calling you a liar. So challenge them to say that in court that you are lying
If someone ask u to be a defendant say thank you but I cant accept that title as I am
incompetent in legalese as I dont belong to your society and great harm will come to me if I
do.

Mister, as a title of courtesy before a man's Christian name, mid-15c., unaccented variant
of master. As a form of address, without a name and with a tinge of rudeness, from 1760.

Jurisdiction
JURISDIC'TION, noun [Latin jurisdictio; jus, juris, law, and dictio, from dico,
to pronounce.]
425 | P a g e

1. The legal power of authority of doing justice in cases of complaint; the

power of executing the laws and distributing justice. Thus we speak of
certain suits or actions, or the cognizance of certain crimes being within
thejurisdiction of a court, that is, within the limits of their authority or
commission. Inferior courts have jurisdiction of debt and trespass, or of
smaller offenses; the supreme courts have jurisdiction of treason, murder,
and other high crimes. jurisdiction is secular or ecclesiastical.
2. Power of governing or legislating. The legislature of one state can exercise
no jurisdiction in another.
3. The power or right of exercising authority. Nations claim
exclusivejurisdiction on the sea, to the extent of a marine league from the
main land or shore.
4. The limit within which power may be exercised.
Jurisdiction, in its most general sense, is the power to make, declare or apply
the law; when confined to the judiciary department, it is what we
denominate the judicial power, the right of administering justice through the
laws, by the means which the laws have provided for that
purpose. jurisdiction is limited to place or territory, to persons, or to
particular subjects.

Deny
DENY, verb transitive
1. To contradict; to gainsay; to declare a statement or position not to be true. Wedeny what
another says, or we deny a proposition. We deny the truth of an assertion, or the assertion
itself. The sense of this verb is often expressed by no or nay.

Write a letter to your secretary of the state hey lady, I have a bond here that covers the
bare minimum 10 20 10 which is the minimum required insurance for the state of illinios for
insurance. I dont need you licence, I dont need your registration. Here is your notice and if
a cop stops me I am going to give him your number and we are going to work this out in two
seconds. Or you can send me a letter stating I am free and clear of any obligations . if you
think you are going to burden me with all this nonsense or you think my position is not true

426 | P a g e

let me know.. ,y next letter will be to file a claim and drag u in to court and get this cleared
up..
This might be a notice u have to file
Notice if there is any paperwork or any orders stylized karl lentz petitioner or karl lentz
petitioner please address that to the clerk of the court ______(insert name) (not court clerk
as clerk court is the underling) as she is the one who has created that legal fiction as I gave
her no authority to do so on my part..she is liable

Fraudulent Practices (IFI Guidelines define) as: Any act or omission, including a
misrepresentation, that knowingly or recklessly misleads, or attempts to mislead, a party to
obtain a financial or other benefit or to avoid an obligation.
Deposition- In the law of the United States, a deposition is the out-of-court oral testimony
of a witness that is reduced to writing for later use in court or for discovery purposes. It is
commonly used in litigation in the United States and Canada, where it is
called examination for discovery, and is almost always conducted outside of court by the
lawyers themselves (that is, the judge is not present to supervise the examination). In other
countries, testimony is usually preserved for future use by way of live testimony in the
courtroom, or by way of written affidavit.

estop
estp/
verb
LAW
past tense: estopped; past participle: estopped
1.
bar or preclude by estoppel.
Make sure you get a chance and really listen to Karl Lentz in his own voice express the
concepts via the Craig lynch series or the full talkshoe episodes. But after that I urge you to
dig deeper and listen to these noteworthy people to help round out and give you more
insight ..Bill Thorton, Richard Cornforth, Dean Clifford, Kurt Kallenbach, The Informer, and
Frank Collins .....I recommend u watch them in that order and don't ask me why.....
"Each time a man
stands up for an
ideal, or acts to improve
the lot of others, or
strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of
hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers
of energy and daring, those ripples build a current which
can sweep down the mightiest walls of
oppression and resistance."
Robert F. Kennedy

427 | P a g e

June 6th 1966

Capetown
Now go and tell everyone you love

428 | P a g e