Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Directions:
Students are required to complete each area based on the scan comp completed to receive maximum
points.
There are 10 sections; each section is worth a maximum of 5 points. Answers provided must relate to
specific information requested. Additional information including non-applicable information will result in
point deduction
Before the exam: Patient Interview, Chart Review, Possible Pathology, Patient Set Up, and Preparation
Section 1:
Identify the patients age, sex, ethnicity, current symptoms and pertinent history relevant to the exam.
Answer: A 53 year old Caucasian male who presented with right upper extremity swelling. The patient was in the
CCU and on a ventilator so no history about how long swelling has occurred could be asked. The patient did have
significant bruising on the underside of the forearm extending into the antecubital fossa also with so significant
swelling noticed and small amounts of edema was seen with ultrasound throughout the arm.
Identify the patients labs relevant to the exam (as high, low, or normal) and explain what the patients lab values
indicate.
If the patient had no labs, identify the labs relevant to the exam (with normal values) and explain what deviations
in these lab values indicate.
Answer: The patients D-dimer was elevated at 3.48 mg/L with normal values supposed to be less than 0.5 mg/L. A
positive D-dimer result may indicate the presence of an abnormally high level of fibrin degradation products. It
indicates that there may be significant thrombus formation and breakdown in the body
Identify the patients previous exams and results relevant to this exam.
If the patient had no previous exams, identify one other imaging modality that could be used to evaluate your
patients symptoms. Explain why this modality would be used in conjunction with sonography.
Answer: The patient had no previous exams relevant to an upper extremity venous ultrasound. A modality that
could be used is venography which is an x-ray test that involves injecting x-ray contrast material into a vein to
show how blood is flowing through the veins.
Grade for Section 1
Section 2:
Based on the patients clinical history, labs, and previous exams and results, what did you expect to find during this
exam and why?
Answer: Before seeing the patient, since they had no history of a previous blood clot or any imaging performed to
rule out one, I did not expect to see one but once seeing the patient on a ventilator and immobile with the swelling
and bruising on the arm, I expected that the patient could possibly have a blood clot based on the situation.
Grade for Section 2
During the Exam: Sonographic findings of structures, pathologies, measurements, and instrumentation
Section 4:
Identify the gray scale and color Doppler sonographic features of the upper extremity veins included in this
protocol.
Answer: The deep veins found in the arm; the internal jugular, subclavian, brachial, radial, and ulnar veins are all
paired with an artery and sonographically appear with thin echogenic walls that collapse with compression, beside
the subclavian vein and they have anechoic lumen when free of thrombus. The superficial veins; basilic and
cephalic also appear with thin echogenic walls that collapse with compression and anechoic lumen. With color
Doppler, veins should completely fill with blue color without color aliasing or color noise present with the box
angled parallel to the vessel, no angle correct is needed when examining veins.
Grade for Section 4
Section 5:
Describe all venous spectral waveforms obtained and identify if each waveform is normal or abnormal. If
abnormal, what is indicated?
Answer: All venous spectral waveforms obtained were abnormal due to the fact the patient was on a ventilator.
The waveforms did not exhibit respiratory phasicity and cardiac pulsatility in the internal jugular, innominate, and
subclavian veins, instead there was on respiratory phasicity with the ventilator. The spectral waveforms in the
other upper extremity veins were phasic with the ventilator but did not look like normal venous spectral
waveforms seen. Also there was no augmentation performed during the exam because the patient did have a
thrombus in the basilic and cephalic veins.
Grade for Section 5
Section 6:
Identify the pathology documented during the exam including location, size, vascularity, and sonographic features.
If no pathology is seen, identify a common pathology seen with this exam and how you would need to modify your
protocol to document this pathology.
Answer: There was a hyperechoic non-occlusive thrombus seen in the basilic vein peripherally in the arm. The
thrombus found in the basilic vein exhibited color flow through the center of the vein with very little spectral
Clinical Site:
Sonographer with credentials and
specialties:
Patient MRN:
Exam order on request:
Performance date of final scan comp:
Is this a second attempt written comp?
BMH Desoto
Audrey Galey RDMS (AB)(OB), RVT
1C10614294
Ultrasound Venous Upper Extremity Right
03/23/2015
NO
Points
Description