Assessment Feedback

Summative Formative

Student Name Student ID

Programme BA (Hons) Design for Interaction Level 2

Project Title Project Value
Unit Title Interactive Spaces Unit Code ACT206
Project Leader Unit Leader

Assessment Criteria Indicative Grading

Excellent V Good Good Satisfactory Basic Fail N/A
Project proposal and research
1 Identification and collation of appropriate concepts,
technologies and processes pertinent to the project
proposal; (LO3)
2 Feasibility of proposed interactive environment; (LO2)
3 Appropriateness of proposed interactive environment for
the purposes specified in the brief. (LO1)
Project
4 Creative exploitation of technologies in the design of the
physical interactions; (LO4, LO5)
5 The quality of the designed interactive experience in the
space; (LO3)
6 The degree to which the realised project fulfils the
purposes and specifications set out in the original brief and
the intentions set out in the project proposal. (LO4, LO5)
Individual Project Log
7 Evidence of individual contribution to a collaborative and
iterative process in the design and development of the
project. (LO3)
Note 1 - Unless specified in the Project Brief it is assumed that all assessment criteria are equally weighted

Overall comment including strengths and areas for improvement

Grade Banding Brief Grade Descriptor

A+ 90-100 High Excellent all round work or outstanding
A 80-89 Medium performance Grade (where appropriate)
A- 70-79 Low
B+ 67-69 High High level achievement or very good level of
B 64-66 Medium performance
B- 60-63 Low
C+ 57-59 High Good level of achievement or proficient
C 54-56 Medium performance
C- 50-53 Low
D+ 47-49 High Satisfactory level of achievement or competent
D 44-46 Medium performance
D- 40-43 Low
E 35-39 Marginal Elementary achievement or basic level of Note 2 - All summative grades are subject to ratification by the Examination Board
Pass performance
F+ 30-34 Marginal Does not achieve the learning outcomes but
Fail may be some element of understanding or Please contact your Unit Leader about retrieval
Assessor(s) Name: competence arrangements (where appropriate)
F < 30 Fail No evidence of achievement or competence
F- > 10 Poor Fail
0 0 no submission or special circumstances

Student signature: Date sent to student: