Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
3 (Articles 1199-1206)
30
(b.3.) The debtor has no right to choose those prestations which are impossible,
unlawful, or which could not have been the object of the obligation.
(Art. 1200, par. 2)
(b.4.) The choice cannot produce any legal effect until it has been communicated
to the other party. (Art. 1201)
(b.5.) The debtor loses the right of choice when only one alternative prestation is
practicable of performance. (Art. 1202)
READ THIS CASE IN ITS ORIGINAL TEXT: Ong Guan Can vs. The
Century Insurance
December 2, 1924.
Co.,
Ltd.,
G.R.
No.
L-22738,
4. Art. 1203. The debtor is given the right to rescind the contract with damages if, by
reasons attributable to the creditors acts, the debtor cannot exercise his right of choice
among the prestations, according to the terms of the contract.
5. In alternative obligations, what are the effects of the loss or impossibility of the
alternative prestations before the right of choice has been exercised?
(A) When the choice belongs to the debtor.
(a) If the loss is due to a fortuitous event :
(a.1.) If all are lost, the obligation is extinguished. (Art. 1174)
(a.2.) If two or more of the alternatives remain, the debtor can deliver any of
the two remaining. (Art. 1202)
(a.3.) If only one remains, there is no more alternative obligation but a simple
obligation. What he should deliver is the remaining object. (Art. 1202)
(b) If the loss is due to the debtors fault :
(b.1.) If all are lost, the obligation is converted into monetary consideration as
indemnity for damages, taking into consideration the value of the last
thing/service lost plus damages. (Art. 1204, pars. 1 & 2)
31
(b.2.) If two or more of the alternatives remain, the debtor can choose which
one to deliver (between the two) but NO damages. (Art. 1200, par. 1)
NOTE: The debtor is NOT liable for damages since he has the right of
choice, and the obligation can still be performed. This is an exception
to the general rule established in Article 1170 regarding liability for
damages arising from negligence.
(b.3.) If only one remains, there is no more alternative obligation but a simple
obligation. What he should deliver is the remaining object but NO
damages. (Art. 1202)
(B) When the choice belongs to the creditor.
(a) If the loss is due to a fortuitous event The effects are the same as when
the right of choice belongs to the debtor.
(b) If the loss is due to the debtors fault :
(b.1.) If all are lost, the obligation is converted into monetary consideration as
indemnity for damages, taking into consideration the value of any of
the objects chosen by the creditor (because he is given the right of
choice) plus damages. (Art. 1205, par. 2[3])
(b.2.)
NOTE No. 1 : When the choice belongs to the creditor, and the loss is due to the debtors
fault, there is damages to be awarded because the creditor was deprived of his right to
choose.
NOTE No. 2 : In all cases, there is NO communication of the choice made. If there was
already a communication, there is no more alternative obligation. The obligation becomes
pure after communication of the choice, and the abovementioned rules are no longer
applicable.
32
6. In facultative obligations, the right of choice belongs ONLY to the debtor (Art. 1206,
par. 1). Once the substitution is made, the obligation is converted into a simple one to
deliver or perform the substituted thing or prestation. The substitution, likewise,
becomes effective from the time it has been communicated (Art. 1201).
7. In facultative obligations, what are the effects of the loss or deterioration of the thing?
(a) If lost before substitution.
Principal Thing
Substitute
Substitute
(a) If due to a fortuitous event, the
obligation is extinguished.
(b) If due to the debtors fault, he is liable
for damages.
(b) Facultative D will give prestation No. 1, but if D wants, he may give prestation
No. 2.
extinguished (because the principal object has been lost), and D does not have to
give object No. 2.
APPLICATION/PROBLEMS :
1. On December 4, 2014, D obtained a loan from C in the amount of P300,000.00.
It was agreed by the parties that on June 15, 2014, D could comply with his obligation by
payment to C of the P300,000.00, or by delivering to C 150 sacks of Dinorado rice, or by
giving C 15 German Shepherd puppies. On June 15, 2015, D was short of cash so he
paid C the amount of P150,000.00. At the same time, D also delivered to C 75 sacks of
Dinorado rice which was valued at P150,000.00. C, however, refused to accept Ds
payment and delivery. Is C legally justified in rejecting Ds payment? Clue: Art. 1199.
2. On February 11, 2015, D obliged himself to give C his emerald ring or his portable
Panasonic DVD player. It was agreed that D will deliver the emerald ring or the portable
DVD player to Cs house on or before July 15, 2015. On July 15, 2015, D arrived at the
house of C and delivered to C his emerald ring. C, however, refused to accept the
emerald ring and insisted that D deliver the portable DVD player instead. D, however, was
stubborn and insisted that C accept the emerald ring. Decide on the rights of the parties.
Clue: Art. 1200.
3. On January 31, 2015, D obliged himself to give C, at Ds option, on April 15, 2015,
the following objects: (a) his goat from Israel worth P45,000.00; (b) his Swiss cow worth
P55,000.00; or, (c) his Australian kangaroo worth P60,000.00. On March 24, 2015, before
D had a chance to communicate his choice of the prestation to be complied with to C, both
the goat and the cow died because Ds caretaker had neglected to feed them for 2 weeks.
What will be the obligation of D to C on maturity date? What will be his liability?
Clue: Art. 1204.
Aristotle
35