0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
19 vizualizări1 pagină
The FRBR model has three groups of entities with different terminologies and relationships. Denton identifies "the use of axioms to explain the purpose of catalogs" and argues that FRBR is a manifestation of all four ideas. The model seems to have resulted from the desire of the library profession to address the idea of "the work"
The FRBR model has three groups of entities with different terminologies and relationships. Denton identifies "the use of axioms to explain the purpose of catalogs" and argues that FRBR is a manifestation of all four ideas. The model seems to have resulted from the desire of the library profession to address the idea of "the work"
The FRBR model has three groups of entities with different terminologies and relationships. Denton identifies "the use of axioms to explain the purpose of catalogs" and argues that FRBR is a manifestation of all four ideas. The model seems to have resulted from the desire of the library profession to address the idea of "the work"
My understanding of FRBR is of a system that was created with the
intention to assist in the cataloguing process by providing a model that
aids in describing the relationships between the various entities that exist within the bibliographic universe. The FRBR model has three groups of entities with different terminologies and relationships that are meant to reflect the importance of the role of information for performing user tasks (Tillet). Denton identifies the use of axioms to explain the purpose of catalogs, the importance of user needs, the idea of the work, and standardization and internationalization as four ideas that have persisted through modern Anglo-American library history and argues that FRBR is a manifestation of all four. The FRBR system has fleshed out the idea of the work by breaking it down into its Group 1 entity, Work, expression, manifestation, item. This ordering allows for a number of results when searching for or imagining a particular work rather than a single item The group 2 and 3 entities also allow for various results but all the while maintaining a standardized model. The FRBR model seems to have resulted from the desire of the library profession to address the four ideas Denton identifies in his article. The model grew from previous models that sought to standardize and address the idea of the work in the bibliographic universe.