demand its enforcement, the passive one is duty-bound to suffer such enforcement.92 On the one hand, BPI could not have been an active subject, because it could not have demanded from CASA a response to its notice. Besides, the notice was a measly request worded as follows: "Please examine x x x and report x x x."93 CASA, on the other hand, could not have been
II. The Court of Appeals Erred in Finding That There Can Be No Valid Partition Among The Heirs of The Late Efraim Santibañez Until After The Will Has Been Probated
II. The Court of Appeals Erred in Finding That There Can Be No Valid Partition Among The Heirs of The Late Efraim Santibañez Until After The Will Has Been Probated