Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Technology
Blended Learning Models
Provide progress to
personalized learning.
Active learning and
engagement
More collaboration among
students- peer engagement.
Improve 21st century skills
Futuring Techniques
Scenarios
Technique used to anticipate
future changes in education.
Several future situations are
anticipated and creative
thinking is used to develop
strategies.
Collaboration among key
team members.
Scanning
Collect statistically
significant data to assist in
futuring process.
Observations of students,
faculty, parents and
administration. Identify
perceptions.
Monitor trends in
educational institution
Challenges
Process of scanning and
building scenarios is time
consuming and costly.
Technology Trends
Student Centered
Learning
Flipped
Classroom
Accommodate students
with varying ability
levels.
Work at own pace.
Adaptive to meet
student & teacher needs
Student partnerships
and internship
possibilities.
Self-directed learning is
facilitated
Demographic Trends
ECONOMIC TRENDS
Property tax assessment of wealth results in
discrepancy of funding between districts.
Supplemental funds from grants needed
Develop partnerships with local businesses
to assist with resources and student
internships
Budget planning and preparation for
allocating resources.
Budget to include professional development
and teacher training.
Political Trends
Every Student Succeeds Act2015
State and local districts determine goals for
student success
Curriculum could be revised to align with
technology implementation
Determine appropriate student assessments
to monitor progress
Collect data and use to inform instruction.
Vision/Plan
School Climate
Improve
Vision/Plan
And Learning
Increase Student
Engagement
Call to Action
References
Kazua,I.Y., & Demirkolb,M., (2014), Department of Education. Effect of Blended Learning Environment Model on High
School Students Academic Acheivement. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1018177.
Motteram, G., & Sharma, P. (2009). International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society. Blending Learning in a
Web 2.0 World, 7(2), 83-96. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?
doi=10.1.1.476.8414&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Partnership for 21st Century Learning, (January 2016), Retrieved on January 24, 2016, from www.p21.org
Sterner,R.,(February 24, 2015) Center for Teaching Quality. Retrieved from
http://www.teachingquality.org/content/blogs/robert-sterner/4-things-you%E2%80%99ll-miss-banning-cellphones-yourclassroom
Solochek, J.S., (February 22, 2015), Tampa Bay Times, Retrieved from
http://www.tampabay.com/news/education/k12/in-flipped-classrooms-teachers-lecture-online-use-class-for-practice/22
References
Keinan, G. (1987). Decision making under stress: Scanning of alternatives under controllable and
uncontrollable threats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (3). Retrieved from
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/52/3/639/
Dean, J.W. & Sharfman, M.P. (1996). Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making
effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (2). Retrieved from
http://amj.aom.org/content/39/2/368.short
Mietnzner,D. & Reger, G. (2005). Advantages and disadvantages of scenario approaches for strategic
foresight. Retrieved from http://www.lampsacus.com/documents/stragegicforesight.pdf
Sobrero, P.M. (2004). Futuring: The implementation of anticipatory excellence. Journal of Extension.
Retrieved from http://www.joe.org/joe/2004june/comm2.php
George, S. (2013, March 6). The future of education: Sajan George at TEDxUNC. Retrieved from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ah-SmLEMgis
References
Aslan,S.,& Reigeluth, C.M. (2015). Examining the challenges of learner-centered education. Phi Delta Kappan,
97(4), 63. doi: 10.1177/003172171561922.
Bruder, P. (2014). Gadgets go to school: The benefits and risks of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device). Education
Digest, 80(3), 15-18.
Education Commission. (Aug. 2013), The progress of education reform: Who pays the tab for k-12 education?, 14
(4) Retrieved Feb. 13, from, http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/01/08/47/10847.pdf
Eng, N. (2013). The Impact of Demographics on 21st Century Education.Society,50(3), 272-282.
doi:10.1007/s12115-013-9655-z.
Gilstein, J. (2013). Student-centered learning. Salem Press Encyclopedia p1. Retrieved from
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/
Irizarry, J. G. (2015). What Latino Students Want from School.Educational Leadership,72(6), 66. Retrieved from
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/
References
Heckman, R., Osterlund, C., & Saltz, J. ( 2015). Blended learning at the boundry: Designing a new internship. On-line Learning
Journal. Retrieved from http://www.olkc2013.com/sites/www.olkc2013.com/files/downloads/202.pdf
Johnson,L., Adams Becker, A., Estrada,V., & Freeman, A., (2015). NMC Horizon Report: K-12 Edition.
Lacey, K. (2014). Byod success story. District Administration,50(6), 83-87.
Khan, S., (2011). Year 2060: Education predictions. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=CiKrFcgVSIU
Klien, A., (2016). New law, fresh challenges. Education Week, 35(15),10.
Rico, R., & Ertmer, P. (2015). Examining the role of the instructor in problem-centered instruction. Trechtrends:
Linking Research & Practice To Improve Learning, 59(4),96, doi: 10.1007/s11528-015-0876-4.
Rivero, V. (2015). The Bring-Your-Own Dilemma.Internet@Schools,22(2), 7.
Sobrero, P., (2004). The steps for futuring. Journal of Extention, 42(3). Retrieved from
http://www.joe.org/joe/2004june/comm2.php
Westermann, E.B., (2014). A half-flipped classroom or an alternative approach? Primary Sources and Blended