COLLABORATIVE PROJECT PEER EVALUATION

Project: ArtsBridge Integration: Adapting Animals

Your Name: Larissa Washburn
Your Role: co-facilitator
Peer's Name: Stormy Knaak
Peer's Role: co-facilitator
Place an "X" in the appropriate column for each row, indicating your peer's performance in the stated category.
Frequency of
Rating

< 1% of
Scores

1-10% of
Scores

Rating

Truly
Inspirational

Extremely
Impressive

Collegiality &
Collaboration
Raw Talent /
Ingenuity
Commitment
& Dedication
Performance /
Execution
Overall
Dependability

80% of Scores Should Fall Into These Rankings

Above Average

Average

1-10% of
Scores

< 1% of
Scores

Struggling

Completely
Uncceptable

x
x
x
x
x

Describe this peer's greatest strengths / contributions to the project:

Stormy was always dependable and willing to help, and was willing to help me when I wasnt sure what to do during the lesson. She was definitely more skilled
in classroom management then I am, and I appreciated how she would point out what went well in the lesson, not necessarily the negatives.

Describe how this peer could have made a stronger contribution to the project:
One thing that Stormy could improve on is classroom management, but to be fair the one class we facilitated together on was a more rambunctious class. But as
Stormy learns more about what to do in certain situations I know she will improve.