Sunteți pe pagina 1din 20

A) The

Writ
B) Originating Summons
C) Services of the documents

CP1_L6_NFA

Issuance of the Writ

ROC 2012:

O6 R1 ROC 2012
Every Writ shall be in Form 2.

Writ is effective only when issued: Case: Jumatsah v Voon Kim Kuet (1981) 1
MLJ 254
Kok Song Kong v Brunei Shell (1988) 2
MLJ 440
CP1_L6_NFA

Indorsement of a Writ

Writ must be indorsed


O 6 R2 ROC 2012
Case: Pontin v Wood (1962) 1 QB 594
Khoo Kay Hock v E.J Ketting (1978) 2 MLJ
57
O6 R2 (a) ROC 2012- Statement of claim (O18)
O6 R2 (b-f) ROC 2012

CP1_L6_NFA

A writ has a life span of 6 month

O6 R 7 (1) ROC 2012 (beginning of the date it is


issued)
A writ issued on 02.02.1994 cannot be served on
02.02.1995.
Case: Trow v Ind Coope (West Midlands) (1967)
2 QB 899

CP1_L6_NFA

A writ may be renewal but renewal is not

automatic
O6 R7(2), (2A) ROC2012
Case: Battersby v Ors v Anglo American Oil
Co. & Ors (1945) 1 K.B 23
Binning Bros Ltd Ltd (In liquidation) v
Thomas Eggar Verall Bowles (a firm) (1998)
1 All ER 409
Duli Yang Maha Mulia Tunku Ibrahim Ismail
Ibni Sultan Iskandar Al-Haj v Datuk Captain
Hamzah Mohd Noor (2009) 4 CLJ 329
CP1_L6_NFA

Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Barbrak Ltd (1987) 1


A.C 597
New Ching Kee v Lim Ser Hock (1975) 2 MLJ
183
Kuin Kay Hong v Tan Teo Huat (1985) 1 MLJ
404
Arab Malaysian Credit Bhd v Tan Seang Meng
(1995) 1 MLJ 525
Llyod Triestino Societa v Chocolate Products
(Malaysia) Sdn.Bhd (1978) 2 M.L.J 27
Castle Inn Sdn Bhd v Bumiputra- Commerce
Bank Bhd (2007) 8 CLJ 545
CP1_L6_NFA

Older cases indicate that renewal after the limitation


period has expired will only be permitted in the most
exceptional circumstances.
Case: Heaven v Road & Rail Wagons (Ltd)
1965 2 All E.R 409 lays down few exceptions: Agreement to defer service
Delay induced by words or conduct of D
D evaded service

CP1_L6_NFA

O7 R2 ROC 2012-Form 5 or 6

O7 R3 ROC 2012-Contents
Statement in questions

O7 R5 ROC 2012-Issue of OS
O7 R6 ROC 2012-Duration and renewal of OS
O28 R3A ROC 2012-Hearing of the OS
O28 R7 ROC 2012-Counter claim by Defendant
O28 R4 ROC 2012-Directions by Court
O28 R5 ROC 2012-Adjournment of hearing of OS
CP1_L6_NFA

O1

R2 ROC
proceedings:-

2012-Rules

apply

to

all

Magistrate Court, Sessions Court and High Court.

CP1_L6_NFA

Writ must be served on each Defendant

O10 R1 ROC 2012


O62 R3 ROC 2012- Personal service
Case : Thompson v Pheney 1 Down
443
Roase v Kempthone 103 L.T 730
Banque Russe v Clarke (1894)
W.N.203
O62 R1 ROC 2012
CP1_L6_NFA

10

Services also may be affected by:-

O 10 R 1 (2) ROC 2012


O10 R 1 (3) ROC 2012
O10 R 4 ROC 2012-Immovable property
O73 R3 and Sec.26 Government Proceedings Act
1956
O11 R 5 (3) ROC 2012- Leave outside jurisdiction
Service on persons under disability-O76 R 14 ROC
2012
Service on partners-O77 R3 ROC 2012
CP1_L6_NFA

11

Service on corporations O62 R4 ROC 2012

Registered office (personally or post)


Principal office (registered post only)
Handing a copy to director, secretary or principal
officer
Service

on companies registered under the


Companies Act 1965
Case: Lee Boon Fatt v Takhdir Trading Sdn Bhd
(1984) 2 MLJ 341; Yew Leek etc Bhd v Foong
Engineering etc Bhd (1990) 2 MLJ 62
Summit Company (M) Sdn Bhd v Nikko Products
Sdn Bhd
CP1_L6_NFA

12

Substituted Service
O62 R5 ROC 2012
Case: Re Nirmala (s) a/p Muthiah Selvarajah (1988) 2

MLJ 616
Application by summons supported by affidavit in
Form 136
Order from the Court-Form 135

Necessary to show that it is impracticable to effect

personal service. (Practise Note 1/68)


Not applicable where Dfs whereabouts not known.
CP1_L6_NFA

13

Unless the terms of the order for SS (when

granted) are duly complied with, the service is


bad.
Case: Leow Boke Chooi v Asia Motor Co. Ltd
(1967) 2 MLJ 109
Development & Commercial Bank Berhad v
Aspatra Corporation Sdn Bhd & Anor
(1996) 1 CLJ 141
Form 134-Notice and Affidavit
Form 133-Court Order
CP1_L6_NFA

14

Service Out of Jurisdiction


O11 R1(1) ROC 2012-with the leave of the
Court, in certain cases
O11 R4(2) ROC 2012-leave would not be
granted unless proven that the case is a proper
one for service outside jurisdiction

CP1_L6_NFA

15

CP1_L6_NFA

16

Discretion exercised with care


Normally no interference
Exceptions-excessive cost, delay, inconvenience, cannot
obtain justice.
Service of a notice of a writ is permissible with leave if
the writ action involves:-O11 R1 (1) (a)-(m) ROC 2012

CP1_L6_NFA

17

Application
By ex parte summons supported by
affidavit in Form 12
Contents of the Affidavit: Grounds on which the application is
made and the applicable provisions
(O11 R 1 (1) ROC 1980)
The Deponents belief that he has a
good cause of action.
CP1_L6_NFA

18

Cases:

International Corporation Ltd v Besser


(1950)1 KB 488
Amin Rasheed Shipping Corp. v Kuwait
Insurance Co (1983) 2 All E.R 884
Official Solicitor v Stype Investments
(Jersey) Ltd (1983) 1 All ER 629
Sunkyong International plc v MRDC
Bhd (1992) 2MLJ 146

CP1_L6_NFA

19

Notice of the Writ to be served outside Jurisdiction


Form 7 (O11 R4 ROC 2012)

Effective service
O11 R5- 58 ROC 2012

Is SS valid when the Defendant is outside the


jurisdiction?
Case: Bank Bumiputra v Lorraine Esme Osman
(1986) 1 MLJ 426

CP1_L6_NFA

20

S-ar putea să vă placă și