Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Evaluative criteria
Recording
What do the
achievement
standards say?
In pairs, students are to
appropriate use of
anecdotal notes.
vocabulary as well as an
understanding that
require resources to
water.
Students are to create a
and illustrations
able to demonstrate an
use of an assessment
demonstrating their
understanding of the
rubric to be completed
observations of their
informative language in
Martin_Nathan_17590307_EDP323_Ass2
independent knowledge
of plants.
imaginative sense.
To ensure students have This task will be
continued development
students to establish
significant information
understanding should
to demonstrate what
be at specific times
the unit.
To ensure students have Through the use of a
teacher checklist,
students can be
be able to demonstrate
an understanding of key
as to where their
them in appropriate
development should be
learning task.
Recording justification
Martin_Nathan_17590307_EDP323_Ass2
The measures of recording have been chosen because they all allow for
concrete evidence when interpreting results for parents or carers. By ensuring
that the results from such assessment strategies are recorded and organised
in a manner that enables the teacher to provide proof of student
understandings or lack of understandings, to parents and carers. Anecdotal
notes, teacher checklists, and generated rubrics have both advantages and
limitations. Anecdotal notes require limited training, is useful for future
planning, is open-ended and allows you to catch unexpected discoveries that
students make in a learning environment (Mait, 2014). However anecdotal
notes have limitations that can effect recording, including incidents being
taken out of context, and the quality of records rely on the direct memory of
the recorder (Victoria University, 2015). The use of a rubric to assess student
learning is a strategy that holds various benefits. A rubric allows clear and
consistent expectations stating explicitly what is required from students (Bull,
2014) while it also gives teachers appropriate evidence of student
understanding when communicating with parents and carers. Rubrics also
allow students to self-feedback and well as provide feedback to their peers
which develops a greater understanding of content (Bull, 2014). As with all
assessment strategies rubrics carry limitations. If not done well, a rubric can
place more emphasis on the technical aspect of student work and miss
deeper, creative ideas from students, and this can risk turning student work
into exercises that just follow rules (Bull, 2014). It can have the potential to
create tasks that become narrow and lose the ability to be open-ended and
authentic. If done well and allowing for open-ended, creative thinking then
rubrics can work well as an assessment strategy. Similarly to anecdotal notes,
teacher checklists provide advantages that enable teachers to observe
student learning and follow their development as they reach specific goals.
Teacher lists can be individualised for each student allowing for diversity, and
they also enable the teacher to stay on track of their teaching while also
providing evidence for parents and carers of what stage students are in their
learning (Davis, 2006). Limitations for using teacher checklists are that they
may be narrow and not allow for authentic, open-ended discoveries (Davis,
2006). This can be overcome however by adding an open-ended discoveries
section at the bottom of the checklist (Davis, 2006). The three assessment
Martin_Nathan_17590307_EDP323_Ass2
strategies discussed provide significant information on student development
and transfer through learning and are pivotal in enhancing teacher and
student understandings.
Anecdotal notes, rubrics and teacher checklists allow flexibility for diversion in
the classroom. All of the strategies provided can be adjusted for the individual
and with various students in class, all with differentiating academic skills, it is
essential that the procedures put in place are flexible and can cater for the
diverse population. A rubric can be adjusted by setting lower outcomes while
providing students with varying timelines to complete tasks or gain
understandings of specific content can be tailored with a teacher checklist. As
long as every student is developing and reaching target goals (Robinson,
n.d.), assessment strategies can be used in a flexible and adjustable manner.
Martin_Nathan_17590307_EDP323_Ass2
can display various pieces of work to parents including their writing journals
with continuous observations as well as their drawings with labels. To be able
to show the ongoing development to parents assures them that their child is
learning and gradually beginning to understand a concept as parents can see
what students knew in week one compared to week three (Brady & Kennedy,
2012). The limitations that are associated with process portfolios is that they
can be time-consuming for teachers to create and can be hard to evaluate
needs for improvement against other children because all children learn at
different rates. Parents may be concerned that a child is much further ahead
than theirs and ask questions in regards to this. Overall process portfolios can
be a successful way in which to report student achievement to parents. Open
nights or days, where parents visit the school to participate in activities and
assessment with their children to gain insight into their learning and
development. In reference to the assessment of a drawing of a plant with
labels, parents can be given a modified rubric to critique their children and
give feedback in collaboration with teachers to assess student learning. This
style of reporting can give parents a first-hand insight into the development of
their children in a class setting and see how they socialise and communicate
with other students. Involving parents in the assessment process allows
teachers and parents to collaborate on goals and be able to implement these
goals at home as well as in the classroom (Brown, 1989). Limitations of this
style of reporting can be associated with busy work lives of parents and them
not attending to such events can cause a lack of relationship between parent
and teacher which makes it hard to set concrete goals and improve student
achievement in the classroom (Brown, 1989). The three styles of reporting
discussed both have advantages and limitations however it is important to be
able to build relationships with parents and set goals or address issues that
may be occurring in the classroom or at home. It is also important that parents
see their children are developing and that what they are learning at school is
correlating into their lives outside of school. This builds trust between a
parent, teacher, and school and allows for students to continue their
development.