0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
7 vizualizări1 pagină
The document outlines the grading criteria for an online group discussion and case analysis assignment in a graduate seminar course. It is divided into two main sections: posting questions and leading discussion, and final case analysis. For the discussion component, students are assessed on their ability to pose open-ended questions, guide classmates through the case analysis process, utilize course materials, and keep discussions interesting. The case analysis section evaluates the content of the written analysis, including identifying issues, conducting in-depth analysis using class tools, proposing alternative scenarios, and making recommendations. It also assesses the process, such as logical flow, consistent presentation, and appropriate citations.
The document outlines the grading criteria for an online group discussion and case analysis assignment in a graduate seminar course. It is divided into two main sections: posting questions and leading discussion, and final case analysis. For the discussion component, students are assessed on their ability to pose open-ended questions, guide classmates through the case analysis process, utilize course materials, and keep discussions interesting. The case analysis section evaluates the content of the written analysis, including identifying issues, conducting in-depth analysis using class tools, proposing alternative scenarios, and making recommendations. It also assesses the process, such as logical flow, consistent presentation, and appropriate citations.
The document outlines the grading criteria for an online group discussion and case analysis assignment in a graduate seminar course. It is divided into two main sections: posting questions and leading discussion, and final case analysis. For the discussion component, students are assessed on their ability to pose open-ended questions, guide classmates through the case analysis process, utilize course materials, and keep discussions interesting. The case analysis section evaluates the content of the written analysis, including identifying issues, conducting in-depth analysis using class tools, proposing alternative scenarios, and making recommendations. It also assesses the process, such as logical flow, consistent presentation, and appropriate citations.
Names_______________ I. POSTING QUESTIONS AND LEADING DISCUSSION (50 pts) _______Posted interesting, open-ended questions that led to good discussion (10 pts). _______Led the class through the Identify Issues, Analysis, Alternate Solutions, Recommendations cycle of case analysis (DLE Ch. 13) (10 points). ______Helped class utilize the applicable analysis tools and Blackboard material (10 points) ______When creating questions, used both textbook and assigned Bb readings for the week (10 pts). ________Did not use textbook, or did not use assigned readings, or use was token. ______Kept the class interested throughout the discussion period. Added questions and information from time to time to keep class attention and interest (5 pts). ______ Group utilized techniques to help the class expand its horizons (DLE: Ch 13) (5 pts). II. FINAL CASE ANALYSIS (50 pts) A. CONTENT (35 pts) ______Clearly identified problem or key issue (5) ______Did thorough and in-depth analysis. Used the tools learned in class, textbook and Bb material (15 pts). ______ Proposed alternative strategic scenarios (DLEM, Ch 1). Each had good evidence (10 pts). ______ Made recommendations, stated actions to implement recommendations (5). PROCESS (15 pts) ______ Content was consistent throughout paper so that conclusions flowed logically from the analysis (10 pts). ______ Presentation was consistent throughout paper. Quality of writing was high and similar in all sections (5 pts). ______ Citations were appropriate and consistent throughout paper. Group handed in the analysis through SafeAssign.