AN EXPLANATION OF OMNIPOTENCE

M. N. G. EINSTEIN

Abstract. This work deals with the statements of physics on the fundamental
question of a god or gods in our universe and their existence. Starting from
the Friedmann equations, it will be shown how such an entity, if it existed,
would interact with the cosmos and what conclusions we can draw from it.

Contents
1. Is there a god? 1
1.1. Absoluteness 1
2. Oh god−oh−god 2
3. Annotation 3
4. Footnote 3
5. Summarium 3
References 3

1. Is there a god?
This is one question I get asked a lot. Many think, it is out of our reach and
we can not answer it, either because we do not have the technical advantages yet
and or simply because of our mental lack (of knowledge) for a proper scientific
analysis and or due to the opinion, that it is a theological question, which all has
to be considered as total nonsense. That question is actually quite easy to answer!
Surprisingly. Therefore, is there a god or maybe even more than one?
1.1. Absoluteness. To be able to analyse the question, we first need a way to
handle it properly. Thus, we conclude:
Definition 1.1. A god is a being with a lot of abilities, which includes the om-
nipotence.
With that, we have found a very good method to continue and this is all we need
for a further discussion.

Date: 25. März, 2016.

1
2 M. N. G. EINSTEIN

2. Oh god−oh−god
Theorem 2.1. There is no god, nor are there gods, nor can such beings exist.
Proof. We start with the development of the universe, which is described by the
Friedmann−equations:
Ṙ(t)2 8πγ Λc2 kc2
(1.1) = ρ + −
R(t)2 3 3 R2

R̈(t)2 4πγ 3p Λc2

(1.2) 2
=− (ρ + 2 )
R(t) 3 c 3

from t = 0s until today. Despite the great chaos, that is actually only happening
inside the space, for which we need a proper function, that we therefore say is
represented by C(ti ), we have come into being. For that devolpment we need a
function as well. As a result of physical phenomenas of the evolution, it must be
considered as a linear function M (for mankind); but this depends on the chaos,
because the more it fluctuates, the slower is the development of life (logically).
With everything said follows:
M (C(ti ))
(thus an interdependence of two variables are evaded; in return we have an inter-
linked (vector) function, which does not concern us at all).

In the first instance we have to capture the fact, that the value of |M (C(ti ))|
is not allowed to exceed a certain, critical magnitude:
|M (C(ti ))| ≤ Mkrit
because otherwise we would not have become into being (kind of trivial).

After the definition 1.1 we have though, at the presence of at least one god, one
entity, which not only can influence the space in the equation 1.1 and − 1.2, but
which also is capable to dilatationate, alternate, injure or even equalize physical
laws in general.

This would have immense consequences for C(ti ) due to the sensitive dependency
of all the physical constants and their interactions. Moreover, allows the presence
of such an entity, that |M (C(ti ))| can take any value, since |M (C(ti ))| ∈ R. Thus,
it would follow:
|M (C(ti ))| > Mkrit
a contradiction in two ways, because due to “t = 0s until today“ we have strictly
|M (C(ti ))| ∈ R+ (meaning the function can only take real positive values) and
further the critical magnitude Mkrit will be definitively overstepped. Thus, the
proof is finished. 
 AN EXPLANATION OF OMNIPOTENCE 3

3. Annotation
This form of evidence was proposed by Prof. Dr. Harald Lesch. However, the
paper here follows my own understanding and is therefore consequently my own
elaboration.

4. Footnote
Some will now appeal and interject logically, but, if such a Existentia exists
with an omnipotence, would not this mean, that it would be also able, every
increase of |M (C(ti ))| above the critical value (|M (C(ti ))| > Mkrit ) to equalise
(|M (C(ti ))| ≤ Mkrit ); and that would lead the proof to absurdity. Unfortunately,
such an assumption is in many ways totally wrong. Because, the most definitive
consequence would be, according to the fundamental law of thermodynamics, a de-
struction of energy and entropy, two key quantities in our universe. Such a change
would have to be always observable (in the structure of the universe, in the simplest
sense, it would be an interference with the background radiation).

On the other hand, the question, where such a figure came from has to be an-
swered without any doubt and error, which no theology can.

5. Summarium
In summary, we can say, that our very own existence prevents the entity of a
god or even of many gods. This should not be confused with a matrix or other
false knowledge pretending worlds. Although this would be in a reality with some
physical laws and therefore can not contain a god or godlike being as well; and even
within a false mirroring world, there can not be an omnipotent being, since every
figure in that world would be, again, bound to/by the laws of physics.

References
[1] Bergmann and Schaefer. Lehrbuch der Experimentalphysik, Sterne und Weltraum.