l{ rrrrrsl.l,lllt) .

l()l,l,tloc

and blogs by the Defendant in Exhibit

"E" to the plaint. The plaintiff has

also
produced a printout of a Face Book Post by the Dofendant, which is
claimed to be
of 17 December 2014, repeating these allegations.

By an order dated 25 November 2014, this Court directed a fresh

service of this Motion to be made on the Defendant. ThisiCourt also directed
the
Defendant

to file his reply to the Motion. Learned Counse[ for the plaintiff

submits that the Notice of Motion has been duly served on the Defendant,
after
the order of 2s November 2014, and an e.(oavi! in proof of such service
has
been duly tendered by the Plaintiffs AdvocatQ: De,sbi(e service, the Defendant
ls
absent. The matter has appeared befqrq tnis\Qh/rt earlier, when the Defendant
chose to remain absent. No re(tr(s filedro thi.ryd,i." of Motion either.

prima facie

t['a(gations

made by
-' the Defendant, which are
apparent on the documents anheled to the plaint, amount to defamation.
No

\\-

defence by way of justlfication or otherwise is indicated by the Defendant. ln

the
premises, a case.f.Qi.9rd1t of interim relief is made out. Accordingly,
there shall
l
be an injunct(n,pe4din!
ng lhe hearing and final disposal of this Suit, agaiinst the
Defe.r(9nt reiifdining hi;h from further publishing the imputations and innuendoes

r\?l

made'in'(he'iarticles
and blogs annexed as Exhibit "E" to the plaint, or similar
-r'
,imputationsVhich will prejudicially affect character, and honesty or tarnishing the

i.qdu,of the Plaintiff

by any means including physical circulation, through internet

through messages via mobile etc. There shall be no order as to costs.
The
,
is
disposed
of
accordingly.
.iMotion

\lO

s.c.cuPrE J. )

Pg2of2