Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Pro-Support:
According to Loeffelman v. Board of Education of the Crystal City School District
(February, 2004), Jendra Loeffelman, who was also a tenured teacher, made comments
containing negative racial undertones in front of a class of students. The school board felt that
her uncomplimentary comments violated district policies, did not address a matter of public
concern, and caused an upset in the schools setting and terminated her contract. Ms. Loeffelman
filed suit against the school board claiming that her speech should have been protected under the
first amendment. The court ruled against her stating that her language addressed a private matter.
Ms. Griffin exercised what she felt was her first amendment right to free speech, when she made
a comment that was received conveying racial undertones. According to the Loeffelman case,
Ann Griffins speech is not protected under the first amendment because it did not address a
matter of public concern.
Mt. Healthy City School Dist.v.Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 (1977) demonstrated that a school
district is not liable for removing or disciplining a teacher on the basis of the first amendment,
as long as there are other factors that would constitute removal. These factors may include
concern of fair treatment and capability as a teacher. This case involved Fred Doyle, a social
studies teacher who would have received tenure with the renewal of his contract. Mr. Doyle
came under fire after he shared the school boards new dress code with a local radio station who
poked fun at it. When it came time to renew Mr. Doyles contract, the board opted not to renew
the contract, effectively firing Doyle. The district cited Mr. Doyle using an obscene gesture at
students and sharing of the letter with the radio station as the reasons for nonrenewal. The courts
upheld the firing. Due to the fact that Ann Griffins speech raises concerns about her ability to
maintain fair treatment, her capability as a teacher and her discernment between right and wrong,
the local school board would be within its rights to fire her.
Con-Support:
According to Givhan v. Western Line Consol. School Dist., 439 U.S. 410 (1979), The
United States Supreme Court found in favor of Bessie Givhan, an English teacher, after the
principal recommended that the district not rehire her due to Givhans extensive complaining
about the newly integrated school district and the integration policies adopted by the district.
Find Law (1977, January 11). Retrieved from Find Law for Legal Professionals:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=429&invol=274
Underwood, Julie & Webb, Dean L.(2006) School Law for Teachers: Concepts and Applications
Retrieved from Pearson Education:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=391&invol=563
Find Law (1979, January 9). Retrieved from Find Law for Legal Professionals:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=439&invol=410