Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Commentary
Teacher: Mr Bushong
Title of Article: Wider U.S. trade deficit, weak exports point to slower growth
3
"We expect that the trade sector actually will subtract slightly from growth in the coming year,"
said Peter D'Antonio an economist at Citigroup in New York.
The decline in exports in September was broad-based, with the exception of food and beverages,
which rose.
Exports to the European Union fell 6.5 percent, while those to China slipped 3.2 percent.
Exports to Japan tumbled 14.7 percent. There were also declines in exports to Mexico and
Brazil.
Overall imports were unchanged in September as petroleum imports hit their lowest level since
November 2009.
A domestic energy boom has enabled the United States to reduce its dependence on foreign oil,
tempering the trade deficit. Declining prices, which hit a seven-month low in September, are
also helping to curb the import bill.
Consumer goods imports, however, were the highest on record in September, as were nonpetroleum imports. Cellphones, most likely Apple's (AAPL.O) new iPhone 6 model introduced in
September, accounted for the bulk of the consumer goods imports.
However, it is most likely for a government intervention to fix the current account deficit.
The authorities of the United States may want to use supply-side policies, a combination of
government-led and free market policies assigned to increase the productive capacity of the
country. These policies try to develop a better institutional workplace for production to occur.
There are two types of supply-side policies: market based and government based. A government
based supply-side policy will give capital goods and services where the market failed to do so. A
market based supply side- policy will improve competitiveness and incentives and open labour
markets. The use of a supply-side policy will shift the long-run aggregate supply to the right,
increasing the overall productive capacity of the economy and the full-employment income from
YFE to YFE1.
6
However, the use of supply-side policies will take a lot of time. The authorities of the
United States may want to use protectionism, a method to limit free trade by using tariffs,
quotas, subsidies and other restrictions. All form of protectionism have a similar effect,
nonetheless, the American authorities should use tariffs. A tariff is a tax that must be paid on a
certain class of exports or imports. Here the tariff would be used on imports. The tariff will
increase the price of foreign goods, making them much more expensive than domestic goods. In
the diagram below, there is an increase in the price of supply world. It increases and becomes
more expensive than the domestic goods. This increase the quantity of goods, made by domestic
producers, which shifted from 0 - Q1 to 0 - Q3. There is a decrease in the quantity of foreign
goods which shifted from Qe - Q2 to Qe - Q4. On the graph, c+f represent welfare loss and d+e
represent tariff revenue. Consumers will start to buy more domestic goods due to their cheaper
price. There will be more exports than imports, reducing the trade balance to zero and decreasing
the current account deficit. Furthermore, the increase in demand of goods from domestic
producers will need to hire more people in order to meet this demand. There will be then a
decrease in unemployment. Moreover, the increase in demand of goods from domestic producers
will increase their profit, making these firms very attractive to invest in. The financial account,
which measure the investment of one country with the rest of the world, will be in surplus. The
financial account surplus should cancel out when added to the current account deficit, thus the
overall balance of payment will tend toward zero. Nonetheless, with the use of protectionism will
increase the price of goods in the United States due to the fewer choices and resources
advantages. There will, as well, be a decrease in access to new markets. In my opinion, the use of
protectionism, such as tariffs, will be the best solution for the United States current account
deficit.
Tariff diagram