Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Shane Holbrook
Date: 11/15/2014
Usb W/Housing
USB Housing
ITMT 186
Shane Holbrook
Solution Approach
Date: 11/15/2014
The solution will lie in using affordable ABS Filament plastic, and utilizing a 3D printer as the process of
choice. As due to the size of the community, a bigger mold injection process would cost quite a bit more
per part, due in face of the current population size. So we will use a little of the ABS plastic as possible,
while still making the product as thick as possible, about 0.125 an inch extra on each side, equating to
about 0.625 extra inches in total. Also as opposed to the original, the USB itself will be fully enclosed, with
respect to the prong of the USB being exposed. This will satisfy the durability feature, as well as the
constraints of dimensions, and the constraints of price, which will relate to the process chosen for
manufacturing costing us about $0.05-$0.08 per part produced. This will easily accommodate the 2,078
people, equating to $103.90-$207.80 for the entire community. The next problem to solve will be to make
the product desirable to all ages throughout the community. To target an age group with such a wide range,
I have chosen to simply place a decal on each USB housing on both sides near the USB Prong, and on the
bottom, which will be a decal of the local CBL Semi-Pro Basketball team the Letcher County Miner. We
will also be making the design more ergonomic by placing bump-like grooves on the top, to make
insert/ejections easier. I feel as if all requirements were met with this design, as it isnt something flashy, it
will withstand the elements, as well as be appealing to the community in which the business will be
starting, by utilizing an already set sports organization involved in community expansion, involvement, and
progression as that of the Letcher County Miners.
My design process began concurrently with the ideals from the book, Engineering Design by Rudolph
J. Eggert. (Eggert, R. (2010). Engineering design. Meridian, Idaho: High Peak Press. September
26.2014. pgs.6-7.) In which Eggert focuses on, Form is the solution to a design problem. In which I
have based many designs from in the past. The step process in which I followed is quite simple:
Formulating: In which functional requirements are realized, determine constraints, set performance
targets. Then basically preplanning a new solution to this set of problems.
Generating: In which alternative forms are made (shape, configuration, size, material, manufacturing
processes). This is basically where concepts are drawn up to solve the idea.
Analyze: Predict performance/behavior. Which is basically taking all mathematical data and
determining if the product will work as needed by the customer and satisfy all functional requirements.
(IF NEEDED AN ADDITIONAL STEP OF REDESIGN CAN BE USED HERE WHICH STARTS
BACK AT GENERATE, IN ORDER TO RESELECT AN ALTERNATE CONCEPT WHICH WILL
SATISFY THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE PART.)
Evaluate: Where the performance of each design candidate is compared and the best design is selected.
To simplify the process in which I have chosen is simple: 1. Come up with a problem. 2. Come up
with possible design solutions. 3. Determine if these work the way we need them to, and is possibly the
best. 4. Take the all the designs that made it this far and compare and contrast to select the best.
I chose this approach due in part to the simplicity of the process. The problem itself is quite simple, I
felt as if this process would force me to continuously turn to my problem, without the knowledge of
physics being a factor, I could only worry about customer satisfaction in terms of my target
customer/city of choice. So with this approach, I was forced to make sure I was following closely to
my basic constraints. Below I have included a write up of my Brainstorming sessions, In which my
overall constraints, conceptualization, and dimensions are listed.
ITMT 186
Shane Holbrook
ITMT 186
Shane Holbrook
Project Sketches
ITMT 186
Shane Holbrook
ITMT 186
Shane Holbrook
CAD/ Solidworks Drawings
Date: 11/15/2014
Drawing1-Layout1.pdf
ITMT 186
Shane Holbrook
Date: 11/15/2014
USB_HOUSING_ATTEMPT_1_W_AUX_VIEW.xps
Solidworks
Autodesk AutoCAD
Dial Calipers
Various Computers
I have been using AutoCAD for quite some time, so ease of use is due strictly to familiarity.
I am quite new to Solidworks, so using it in all ways possible and as much as possible, is the best way
to familiarize yourself. I have utilized many facets of the program with this project including, 3D
modeling, as well as the drawing aspects, material placement, and assembly.
The project was quite defined and found myself quite motivated and on track throughout. No need for
anything other than that which was already available to me.
ITMT 186
Shane Holbrook
Date: 11/15/2014
(Shown With ABS Plastic Filament & Mock USB Drive separated from USB Housing)
ITMT 186
Shane Holbrook
Here we can see the finished result once printed and assembled.
ITMT 186
Shane Holbrook
Date: 11/15/2014
Conclusion
10
ITMT 186
Shane Holbrook
Date: 11/15/2014
Although this is the second class that I have done a laboratory report document as this, I have learned much about
the Solidworks software, as it is still new to me. I find it much easier to relate, and to find ways to accomplish my
goals, if presented in the form of something exciting.
The overall objective was completed, I was able to complete the design in the allotted time, and with the dimension
constraints I was presented with. The printer was amazingly accurate and the objective of the printing was also
successful.
It was very relevant, in regards to the software, (Assemblies, basic drawing tutorials), and previous laboratories, as
well as the information covered in the book as well.
The only thing I would have changed in the activity would be the USB sizes. As this can vary upon person to person,
I would give someone a basic dimension for a single USB, that way everyones design would be to solve a
centralized problem, which would still have variance from person to person.
Kolberg, E., Reich, Y., & Levin, I. (2014). Designing winning robots by careful design of
their development process. Research In Engineering Design, 25(2), 157-183.
doi:10.1007/s00163-014-0171-y
o
The basic thing I took from this project was the process itself. How should you attack the problem in order
to come to the solution. In the article listed above, the authors goal was to take high school students and
implement a robotics design process, in which would achieve better improvements, robustness, as well as
turn students into better designers. Like this project, without a sturdy process, you are doomed to fall face
first, and end up lost within all the knowledge.
11