Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
James Hauglie
Introduction
This comparative study will be an examination of pieces created by a
local Milwaukee, Wisconsin artist, C Matthew Luther, and widely
known artist Anselm Kiefer.
Both C Matthew Luther and Anselm Kiefer focus on depicting how
they see their environment and the world around them and through
the use of painting and other mediums on canvas.
The focus of is to analyze the cultural context in the works produced
by these artists.
C Matthew
Luthers works
Varus (1979)
by Anselm Kiefer
Margarete
(1981) by
Anselm Kiefer
C Matthew Luther
Anselm Kiefer
German painter.
Common theme of German history in his
works.
Work addresses controversial issues from
recent history and often refers back to the
Holocaust and Nazi rule.
Heavily impacted by his environment and his
cultures past.
IMPRESSIONS
Varus (1979)
Margarete (1981)
Luthers work is meant to exemplify the pollutants that wreck havoc upon the
environment. He finds a sense of a mission when going to these places to gain his
inspiration.
Feels he has some sense of responsibility to document such tragedies.
Personal connection: Luther suffers from Crohns disease and it can be caused by
bad environmental factors.
C Matthew Luthers
works
Varus (1979) by
Anselm Kiefer
Paintings.
Reference their
environment for work
inspiration.
Uses personal
connection from his
own life
Uses current issues as
inspiration
References past
events and cultural
history as
inspiration for work.
Similarly to Luther I tie in my own personal conflicts and concerns when developing my
ideas for the work I produce.
Luther connects this piece to his city, which is in correlation with my Me Myself and
Eye piece which is a representation of my views on the city and my own artwork.
In the piece Varus, Kiefer displays his use of a wide range of techniques. You can see that
he uses more of a thick unblended brushing technique rather than blending.
The function and purpose: although the piece displays a sense of simplicity it has a
larger deeper meaning behind it, relating to his culture's history. In some of my own
works, they contain a simple form however hold a much larger and impacting meaning
behind it.
Formal Qualities: Margarete contains use of not only paint but also using straw. This
exhibits his ability to use several material when creating his work.
I can connect this to my Mandala, Microcosm piece because that piece of work exhibits
my ability to produce a piece using multiple different mediums. Although my piece isn't
the same exact medium as Kiefers piece it still exhibits the use of multiple different
materials to produce a work of art.
My piece is also on par with Kiefers in a sense that it is a small work of art holding a
meaning that is on a much bigger scale.
Connection to Artists
I have similar qualities in my ark that is also exhibited in the works of Luther and
Kiefer. Although Luther produces more abstract work, whereas I'm very precise and
realistic in my work, we have a strong connection to our origins and how the
environment affects us, the artist, and our artwork we produce. Kiefers intentions are
to create paintings of landscapes that exhibit events that have happened in his culture's
history. I connect with Kiefer on a scale of producing artworks using a lot of different
materials rather than maintaining one medium throughout all of my works.
http://www.theartstory.org/artist-kiefer-anselm-artworks.htm#pnt_3
http://www.jsonline.com/entertainment/arts/art-city-asks-c-matthew-lutherb99467746z1-297405421.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anselm_Kiefer