Kimberley Bukstein Civil Rights Advocate 1039 Barrett Street, St. Paul, MN. 55103 Phone: 651-558-6864 - fax 651-294-9327, E-Mail: rule! Istillapplies@hotmail,com Attn: DHS MEDICAL ASSISTANCE (MA) FRAUD Unit FAX 651-431-7601, Please forward to MA fraud unit Sent by Fax 1/12/2014 Re: MA Fraud Suspect: TAMMY JO LOVE, Owner of Deephaven Chiropractic, P.A, 18281 Minnetonka Blvd, Wayzata, MN 55391. Phone: (952) 475-0079 fax: (952) 475-1030, NPI # 1790882785. Tammy Jo Love lives in Eden prairie, MN 55344. Tammy Jo Love is engaged in MA fraud and is receiving Medical Assistance Grant/month: $477.36 since September 2013 on behalf of the Rucki children who do not qualify for MA and do not live with her. In addition Tammy Love has an established pattern of duplicity and frauds that includes abuse of her license as Chiropractor for unauthorized access the children’s mother Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s health insurance information that the mother provides for the children. The mother provides full coverage for the children. Documents faxed along with this report provides definitive proof that Tammy Jo Love has been engaged in Medical Assistance Fraud in the amount of $477.36 per month since September 2013. See AFFIDAVIT OF PARALEGAL, Barbara J. Jacobson, dated 9/4/2013, in regard C.A. File No. CS-2013-00311. Stating “Public assistance is currently being expended to Tammy Love, custodian, for the benefit of the children in this action in the form of: Medical Assistance — Grant/month: $477.36 (September 2013)”.See also: MCI: 0015184545 that shows the children’s father, David Rucki’s gross monthly income is $25,000.00. See Also: Mother Sandra Grazzini-Rucki's Explanation of benefits from her employer US Airways that shows the mother provides full medical coverage to the children. This is also reflected in the J&D which awards the mother full custody of the children. The children therefore do not qualify for Medical Assistance plus Tammy Jo Love is not the children’s custodian nor does not have any of the 5 children in her care. In fact the two oldest girls Samantha and Gianna Rucki ages 13 and 15 ran away from Tammy Love and David Rucki’s abuses. Then shortly after the oldest girls Samantha and Gianna Rucki testified at a hearing in February 2013 that their father David Rucki, (Tammy Love’s Brother) has a gun and has threatened to kill them and the entire family, plus played a tape recorded voice message where David Rucki makes the death threat and then blasts off 6 gun shots in the background one for each of the 5 children and the mother, both girls went missing on April 19, 2013 and remain on the missing and endangered children data base. (See Missing Children Poster Exhibit C) No one is searching for them and there has been no murder investigation primarily because David Rucki has an unlawful relationship with Dakota County Judge David Knutson, who usurps other judge’s cases in criminal court to acquit David Rucki of all criminal charges. (Currently David Knutson is being sued in Federal Court under 42 USC 1983, and is also under a judicial misconduct investigation by the 8th Circuit Judicial Counsel. Documents are available upon request) Two of the children are missing, and perhaps murdered, and the other three do not live with Tammy Love. The oldest boy lives with a maternal aunt but the two youngest remain trapped and with their violently abusive father.The risk to these children is grave. However due to the "dynamic" in Dakota County we find all investigations into David Rucki’s criminal acts and abuses are all dismissed and/or stonewalled. ‘The paralegal’s affidavit (attached here) was generated as part of an internal child support fraud investigation involving Tammy Love. However this document also verifies that ‘Tammy Love has been fraudulently receiving a Medical Assistance Grant/month: $477.36 since September 2013 on behalf the 5 Rucki children who do not qualify. ‘Tammy Love's crime of MA fraud is but one of many. However the evidence regarding ‘Tammy Love's MA fraud is prima facie. Therefore itis vital the DHS investigate Tammy Love for this crime and for obvious reasons described. Please see the attached exhil . This report was also sent via the on-line hot line. For more information you can contact me, Kimberley Bukstein Civil Rights Advocate or the mother’s attorney Michelle MacDonald. (The mother Sandra Grazzini Rucki is a victim of domestic violence and chronic stalking therefore the mother can be contacted thru us if need be.) Respectfully Submitted, Kimberley Bukstein, Civil Rights Advocate Kimberley Bukstein is a Civil Rights Advocate from Minnesota that works on cases all over the nation. Ms. Bukstein specializes in ethics issues arising in litigation and government agencies. Finding innovative solutions to complex problems, Ms. Bukstein Supports the rights of everyone regardless of position or circumstance and helps legal professionals and public officials identify and repair problems. :EnesCOUNTY OF DAKOTA Case Type Indicator: 4 In Re the Marriage of: ‘Sandra Sue Grazzini-Rucki, Petitioner, AFFIDAVIT OF PARALEGAL vy C.A. File No. CS-2013-00311 | David Victor Rucki, Court File No: 19AV-FA-11-1273 Respondent, and County of Dakota, i Intervenor. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF DAKOTA " Barbara J. Jacobson, having been duly sworn and upon oath, states and deposes as follows: 4. Tam a paralegal in the Dakota County Attomey's Office, Child Support Enforcement Division, and have access to the records of the Dakota County Human Services Department, the Minnesota child support computer system (PRISM) the Minnesota Department of Human Services information system (MAXIS), and the Minnesota Department of Human Services Child Care System (MEC’). Information from said sources was used to complete this Affidavit. 2, Public assistance is currently being expended to Tammy Love, Custodian, for the benefit of the children of this action in the form of: + Medical Assistance — Grant/month: $477.36 (September 2013) Receipt of non-diversionary assistance creates an assignment pet Minn. Stat. § 256.741, Subd. 2. 3, No public assistance hus been expended to David Victor Rucki as of the date ofthis Affidavit 4, Ik is unknown whether David Victor Ricki or Sandra Sue Grazzini-Rucki have appropriate dependent coverage available. CcafomsMeadng Ada of Paalegs! 2007 doeverenbured or uninsured medial expenses not covered by fasunace or Medisl “asistane/MingesotaCate asst forth a the attached Child Support Guidelines Workshes- 6 vio xnown education or employment rela child cre expenses curently is and therefor monthly child care obligation is $0.00. 1. “The following documents are served with this Affidavit and incorporated by eferene: > ‘Social Security Number Inguiry (wage match printouts) inanci 7 PRISM printout of the monthly basic support, medical Case Fina ed eae charges under the mort recent oder Known to the Count Gf Dakota. and chifnows unaudited arears accrued in the IV-D ease() identified on the CES. Further your affiant saith not. s oe Subscribed and sworn to before me this 42% day of September, 2013. 24 ‘Public ise OS ney eeese09% BND OP DATA see‘SUBSCRIBER ID: ‘SUBSCRIBER SANDRA S GRAZZINI ‘egumbFARoo}001.04812.0¢ ‘NAME: » GROUPI POLICY: US AIRWAYS NIAG RUCKI erro ne EXPLANATION OF BENEFITS . claim Summary Information iH rain Name [NIA G RUCK [Si ater ame [cionin, Moy & 5 ai Cute. ae {Slam #—|13x327S36800 Service Line information js oo nie ror//r/M seivies Code (Charges | Considered] — Prov Resp| Fail Alowed] ‘charges Non coveted] "mae sauce copay] cosnsirance Pati] Youowe| _ Notes ta} pparaaaors= 3 Tnchidual “12000 120.00 4375 0007825, ‘900 __25.00 090 5125__ 2500 Pss. 720.00 12004375 ‘00076: 2.00 25.00 $3 — $15 —— So os — ola Tar Pai by other "Toll Provider wr FI = DEFIN;TION: “Tota You Owe" ISTHE AMOUNT, IF ANY, OWED YOUR PROVIDER. THIS MAY INCLUDED AMOUNTS ALREADY PAID TO YOUR, PROVIDER AT TIME OF SERVICE. NOTE 1{S) LISTED BELOW ARE REFERENCED IN THE SERVICE DETAIL SECTION UNDER THE HEADING "Notes ID- DOT (24S) Crarge ercoedsafowable rat or ie eeric of code submited x not on conraciad fee schedule conlncl network or correct code. 75-50) ine ven sows 6 A 8 a Satna Gal OTR im Ta Network oF “Toate Deductible Out of Pocket ‘Deductible Gutot FAMILY: S000 wunu.Liveendwotlovalicom: With liveandworewellcom. you have fie access to « wide range of health end wellbeing information, rossirees and 100 Ree RR Yer Sthance your health and ie, Veit werwlveanaworkwelLcom, anytime day oF night to find network clican, ed help health and Wichnese articles, use tersctive sel-elp tools and planning calculators, take online health quizzes, ook UP resources, and much more. Heats are nick your bones, review network clans, and submit out-of-network claims antine. For immediate, access, tog on to www. rkwellcom United Behavioral Health, oparating under the brand Optum THIS IS NOT A BILL. UBHF-EOBMinnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners Main Page Page 1 of 1 “The information shown here is classified as public under Minnesota Statutes 13.41, subdivision 2 and 4. TAMMY J LOVE [First Name _ TAMMY) [Middle Name] JO Last Name _||LOVE [Gender F. [Address Linet [Address Line2 |[16281 Minnetonka Bivd) City [DEEPHAVEN \State jinnesota [ZIP (55391 \ZIP4 [County [Hennepin [Phone Number|(952) 475-0079 “The address was last verified on 12/27/2012 6:00:33 AM LicenseTypelLicense#|Status _||lssued_||Renewed||Expires [Dc [s658 CTIVE...[9/4/1998)[1/1/2013 [12/31/2013 Disciplinary Orders none hittps:/Avww hb state.mn.us/chi/publicaccess/details.asp?Pid=3271 11/16/2013Poster Page 1 of 1 Endangered Runaway GIANNA RUCKL SAMANTHA RUCKI DOB: Nov 1, 199 DOB: Jun 24, 1998 Age Now: 13 Missings Ape 19,2013 Miasing: Ape 19,2013, Missing From: Missing From: LAKEVILLE LAKEVILLE MN MN United States United States Sex: Female Sex: Female Race: White fair: Brown Eyer: Brown Height: 58° (178m) ‘Weight: 14sTbs(66kg) ‘Weight: 130} (kg) na and Samantha were last seen on April 19,2013, sams dlARR ANYONE HAVING INFORMATION SHOULD CONTACT ‘National Center for Missing & Exploited Children 1-800-843-5678 (I-800-THE-LOST) SeBatataleben Lakeville Police Dspavinsnt (Minnesota) 1-952-322-2323 http://www.missingkids.com/missingkids/servievPubCaseSearchServiet?act=viewPoster..._ 10/26/2013STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT ‘This matter came on for a dofault heating before the Honorable “x Wada Judge of District Court, at the Dakota County Western Service Center, Apple Valicy, Minnesota on ‘flay sa 2011, for a final review on all matters inthis proceeding, “tho Petitioner was represented by Kathryn A. Graves, Esq, ‘The Respondent did not ‘appear except by this Stipulation. ‘thn peien oe hee nt ih eae ateyene. be ania including: child custody and support; spousal maintenance; disposition of real and personal ‘property; and the payment of debis and ettorneys fees ‘The pasties have personally reviewed those Stipulated Plndigs of Fact, Conusions of Law, Order fr Judgment, aad Judgment and Deseo ‘end fully understand all of their provisions. By her/his signature below, she/be voluntarily accepts 1272 FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT FAMILY COURT DIVISION Court File No. AWA A “}/—" In Re the Marriage oft Sandra Sue Grarziul-Rucki, Petitioner, STIPULATED FINDINGS OF FACT, ‘and ° CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, ORDER FOR JUDGMENT, and David Vietor Ruck, IUDGMENT AND DECREE ‘Respondent.the terms and conditions ofthis agreement as being fair and equitable, and requested tha the Court enter the Judgment and Deores based on their agreement. Respondent waived his sight to serve an Answer and Counterpetiton in this matter, and agreed the Petitioner may proceed as if by defwult, withoyt further notice to the pastes, but based ‘upon the terms of their agreement, Ifthe Court does not approve the terms of the partes” agreement, {note then th parties shal be entitled to notice of the samo an thi mater shal then be scheduled for hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the Agreement of tho parties, end all the files and proceedings herein, the Court makes the following: EINDINGS OF FACT 1, The tue and correct name of the Petitioner is Sandra Sue Greazini-Rucki, {formerly known 28 Sandra Sue Grazzinl Her presont address is 19675 Iceland Place, Lakeville,” ‘Minnesota 55044, She was born on September 30, 1965, and is now forty-five (4S) yeers old. 2, The true and comect name of the Respoudent is David Victor Rucki, Respondent is not known by any other names, pastor present, His préent address is 19675 Treland Placo, Lakeville, Minnesola 55044, He was bom on Februsiy 3, 1963, and is now and is wa forty. ight (48) yeas old 3. ‘The Petitioner is represented in this proceeding by Kethryn A. Graves, Bag. of the ficm of Kutz Manka Teplinsky Graves & Sobol Ltd, Suite 4150, 225 South Sixth Street, ‘Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, : 4. ‘The Petitioner and the Respondent were married on August 31, 1991, dina, Minnesota and ever since that time have been, and nove are wife and husband,5, To the best of the Petitioners information and belief, no separate peocseding for dissolution of martiage, legal separation, or custody is pending in any court within the State of ‘Minnesota or elsewhere, 6. For more than one hundred eighty (180) days immediately preceding the commencement ofthis proceeding, the Ptitioner was a resident of Dakota County, Minnesoa, 7, ‘There has been aa inetevable breekdown of the marriage relationship within the meaning of Minn. Stat. $518.06, Subd. & 8. —Nelther purty is u member of the Armed Forots of the United States. 9, No cuder for protection under Chapter 518B ora similar law of another sate sin clot. 10, ‘The parties have five minar children from their marrage: Nico Rucki, bom June 22, 1996, Samantha Ruck!, bom Jung 24, 1998; Gianna Ruck, bom Noveniber 2, 1999; Nia ‘Rucki, born September 25, 2001; and Gino Ruski, bom January 20, 2003. ‘The minor children are not under the jurisdiction of any juvenile court. 11, ThePetitioner is not now pregnant and there are x0 other minot children affected by this proceeding. 12, This Inthe best interes of tho patos minor children tha Pelitione: be gant ole legal and physical castody of them, eubjest to Respondent's right to reasonable parenting the, 13, The financial circumstances ofthe peties upon which the child support, pow ‘maintenance and medioal support provision ofthe Judgment and Decree ace based, are follows: ‘A. The Petitioner is employed part-time as a flight attendant for U.S. Airways, ‘earning a gross monthly income of $1,456.B, Respondent owms a tuck broker business, Rucki Trucking in Lakeville, Minnesota, Respondent has gross monthly income of approximately $20,000. © ‘The Petitioner has monthly expenses for herself and the minor children of approximately $12,000, . D. There are currently no work-related childoare expenses fot the minor children, B, The Respondent's monthly expenses are unknown, F. The Petitioner provides medical insurance coverage for the minor children ‘through her employer at a cost of approximately $400 per month. G. Tho percentage shate ofthe partes’ PICS (parental income for determining child support) is 7% for Petitioner, and 93% for Respondent. ‘The child support awarded herein is consistent with the Child Support Guidelines. Seo attached Keehibit 1, 14, The parties ovm household goods, furniture end furnishings, automobiles, sere yebilo, nd misellanenn pesona propa 15, Tho parties own a homestead located at 19675 Ireland Place, Lakeville, Dakota County, Minnesota, legally described as; Lot 9, Block 1, Paradise Hills, ‘The homestead hes « current fair market value of approximately $410,000. It is subject to @ first ‘mortgage with « balance of epproximately $144,000 and a second mortgage with a balance of ‘approximately $233,000, The dovmpsyment on the homestead was made with Petitloner’s soncattel funds. 16. The parties also own an interest in the following xeal property APP.4A. {ako jropecy leet xt 707 Idle Debus Laks, Pl Coty ‘Wisconsin, legally described as: See attached Exhibit 2, ‘This property is subject to firt mortgage, and a second mortgage in favor of the Respondent's parents, Frederick and Victoria Rucki. There is camaty natant B, Renal properly located at 7459 Flag Avenue, Lakeville, Manes 55044, legally described ‘Sootion 110 Township 114 Range 20 PT of SE Bog NW Cor of 10 114 20 ‘This property is subject to certain encumbrances, including «lien in favor ‘of Respondents parents, There is currently no net value to this property, 17, The parties own household goods, fumiture and furnishings, bank accounts, and amigcellaneous personal property. 18, The parties have incured vatious debis sad obligations dusing the marriage. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1.” Dissolution, The bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between the Petitioner andthe Respondent are hereby dissolved. 2. Custody and Payenting Time, The Petitioner is granted sole logal and physical custody ofthe partie’ minor eitren, Nico, Samanihy, Giana, Nin nd Gino Ruck, subject to ‘Respondent's right to reasonable parenting tims as agreed to by tho pets. 3. Basie Child Support, Beginning May 1, 2011, the Respondent will pay child ‘support to the Petitioner of $3,673 péx month for so long as the paties’ children are minor or dependent chiliven as defined by statute. The child support payments shall be made i equal installments on tho frst and fieenth dey of each month,Begining May, 1, 2011, the Respondent shall pay Petitioner spousal maintenance ‘2£$10,000 per month, The epousal maintenance paymensto Petitioner willbe mede in equal ‘installments onthe fies and sifteeath day ofeach sonth, The spouse maintenance payments will temninate upon the remarriage ar death ofthe Petitioner, Ttis intended that the maintenance payable to Petitioner shall be includable in Petitioner's {roms income pursuant to Section 71 of tho Intemal Revere Code, and willbe deductible by ‘Respondent pursuant to Section 215 of the Intemal Revenve Code, 7 Medical and Doutsl_Inguranee for Respondent, The Petitioner shall insure ‘het the medical insurance and dental coverage on the Respondent presently maiaisined by her ‘thrvigh her employer will be available to the Regpondent for so long. as possible under Minn, Stat, 62A.21,Subd. 2, Minn, Stat, §62C.142, Subd. 2a, Minn. Stat. §62D.101, Subd. 22, the federal COBRA provisions. The Respondent. shall-payifox.any-edditional premiums Petitioner sat pay above the regular cost of funily/dependant coverage for hla coverage, Bach party shall pay for hiser ow unrimbursed medical and dental expenses, §. Lifensutanee For so long ne the Respondent is obligated to pay child support ‘and/or spousal maintenance to Petitioner, he will mainisin life Susurence with net death benefits ‘of not lesa than $250,000, naming Petitioner as the isrevocable beneficiary thereof Ag ‘requested from by Petitioner, Respondeet ell provide welten verification thatthe required net death benefits of insurance are in effect as required by this parageaph 3. Marital Homestead. The Petitioner is awarded all of the partes? interest in the ‘marital homestead loated 19675 Ireland Place, Lakeville, Dakota County, Minnesota, legally APP.6described as: Lot 9, Block 1, Paradise Hl fice fom any interest of the Respondent, Petitioner is solely responsible for payment ofthe frst and second morigages against the property and shall indemnify and hold the Respondent Smee fom peyment of thse scombrance, ‘Title to the homestead shall be transferred to the Petitioner pursuant to the terms of a Summary Real Estat Disposition Judgment which shall be prepared by counsel for the Petitioner, 10. LakeProperty. Petitioner is awarded all right, title and interest in the partics? Lake Property located at 207 Idlewild, Balsam Leke, Polk County, Wisconsin, legally described a: polo -Seetattached Exhibit 2,0." “ i fie from any interest of the Respondent. Petitioner is solely responsible forthe frst mortgage ‘against the cabin and shall indemnify and hold the Respondent harmless ftom payment of this ‘encumbrance. ‘The Respondent is solely responsible for payment of any debt owed to his parents, Frederick and Victoria Rucki, whether such debi was incurred in the namo of Petitioner or ‘Respondent individually, jointly, or on bebalf of the Respondent's business, and is also solely responeibie for the mortgage ugainst the Lake Property which scoures any auch debt, ‘Respondent will indemnify end hold the Petitioner harmloss ftom paymnont of any such debt, Respondent shall remove the lienfmoctgge of his prents agin te Lake Property feta tity (00) days after the enty of the Judgment end Devies.Within thity (30) days afer the etry of the Judgment end Deore the Respondent shal execute and deliver tothe Petitioner a quit chim deed (prepared by counsel fr the Peftionet) transfering all of his interest in the Lake Propet to Pettioner, In tho event the Respondent fils to-do 20, then a certified copy of the Judgment and Deoree shall operate to transfer sole ttle to the Lake Property to the Petitioner. 11, Hlngstaft Avenue Property, Tho Respondent is awarded all of the pasties? "ight, ile and interest inthe ral propery located at 17549 Fapstaft Avenue, Lakeville, Dakota County, Minesota, legally desorbed as: ‘Seotion 10, Township 114, Range 20, PT of SB 4BEGNW COR of 10 11420 free fiom any interest of the Petitioner. The Respondent is solely responsible for any snoumbrances sgsinot this propety and ehallIndeiniy nad bold the Petitioner harmless fiom pyiment ofthis debt ‘Within thinty (20) days after the enty of the Judgment and Decree the Petitioner shall ‘conte and deliver to the Respondent a quit olum deed (prepared by Respondent) trmafering all of her interest in this property to the Respondent. In the event she fails to do 0, then « crated copy ofthe Judgment and Dearee abl operate to transfer sole itt the prope to the ‘Respondent, f 12, Personal Property to be Awarded to Petitioner, The Potitioner is awarded, ag. hr individualproperty, sole possession, ovmerthip, and tile of and all ofthe partie! ntxeat in cach ofthe following assos, fe from any intrest ofthe Respondent: A. The 2006 Chevrolet Suburban automobile and 1990 Mercedes automobile, subject tothe responsibility to pay the loan against this veils.B, All household furnishings, fumiture and personal property ourrently: located at the homestead and J.ake Property, except as mutually agreed by the pastes. C, The 2000 Centurion boat and 2006 Premier pontoon, boat trailers and motors, D. The Disney Vacation Club Timeshare. Any bank accounts in her name. 13, Pessonal Property to be Awarded to Respondent, ‘The Respondent is awarded, ‘as his individual property, sole possession, ownership, and title of, and all of the parties! interest in cach of the following assets, free from any interost of the Petitioner: A, The 1965 Chevelle automobile, 1965 Cadillac automobile and 1998 Chevrolet Truck, B, "Any bank acpountsin his name, C. — Ruoki Trucking. 19. udebfedness, ‘The Petitioner is solely responsibi forthe jobnt credit card debt ‘owed to U.S, Bank and will indemaify and hold the Respondent hacnless from payment of this debt, The Respondent is solely responsible for payment of the following debte and will indemnify and hold harmless the Petitioner from payment of the following debts; fh nde lee A et os ath B. Any debis ove to his parents, whether auch debis were incured solely in pa eee C. The parties’ joint tne debt owed fox 2009 and eny other state or federal taxes owed for the parties. D. Any debt owed to the Country Club, Bach of the parties is solely responsible for any other debts sheshe has inoured APP.9individually including any credit card debts, and shall indemnify and hold the other party harmless from payment af these debts, Tn the event that there is a debt obligation that has not been disclosed by either party, that ‘obligation shell become the sole responsibility of the party who incurred it. Neither party shall contract any debt, charge or liability in the future for which the other party may become lisblo. 20, Attorneys and Expert Bees and Costs, Respondent shall pay half of the Petitioner's costs and attomey's fees incurred in connection with this proceeding. Respondent shall make this payment directly to the law firm of Katz, Manka, Teplinsky, Graves & Sobol ‘within thirty (30) days after entry of the Judgment and Decree. Respondent is responsible for his costs and attorney’s fees incurred incident to this proceeding. Petitioner is responsible for the belance of her remaining costs and attorney's foes. 21.” Soxvice bf Juidginénit and Deore, Sdtvicé 6t n cbipy of the Vind Judgment and ‘Decree herein may be made vpon either party's attomey, in lieu of personal service upon « patty, 2, WthravaLas Attorney it Resor, Kalbe A. Graves, shall na longer be the attomey of record for Potitioner effeative sixty-one (61) days from the date of entry of the Judgment and Deores herein. 23. Bxsoutlon aud Bxchango of Documents, To implement the terms and provisions contained herein, each of the parties shall make, excoute and deliver to the other party instruments of conveyance, assignnent and other documents as may be required. In the event clther paity fails to do 20, a certified copy of the Judgment and Decree shall operate as snid. conveyence,24. Samforconbility, The texms, conditions and provisions contained herein shall inaro to the benefit of and be binding upon and enforceable against each of the parties hereto and their - respective heirs, personal representatives and estates, ORDER FOR JUDGMENT LET THB JUDGMENT AND DECREE BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. BY THE COURT: ce an Decree of the Court.| APFROVED AS TO CONTENT AND FORM: hia Sue ‘i David Victor Ruck, Petitioner 3 Steinert Setind? tay cael Bt metas of ty chee tol. diline ailfoe KATZ, MANKA, TEPLINSKY, Attomeys for Petitioner Sulte 4150 225 South Sixth Street ‘Minneapolis, Minnesota $5402 ‘Telephone: (612) 333-1671 WAIVER OF RIGHT LO COUNSIL ‘Uinowr I have the right to be represented by a lawyer of my choice and I freely and. ‘knowingly waive that right, vas David Vietor Ruck!guardian, and omitted her income and the fact the children are already covered by ‘the mother’s insurance. ‘The fact remains, Tammy Love is currently engaged in MA fraud; the County refuses to address the problem, and therefore the State must recapture these dollars. See Exhibit E. EMAIL FROM SANDRA GRAZZINI-RUCKI. Subject: Tammy Love and Mcdical. ‘This email describes that a “Dr.” Tammy Love has been repeatedly calling in on United Health Care’s provider line and giving a provider number to gain unauthorized access to Sandra’s and her children’s protected Health Insurance information. Additional research has revealed that Tammy Jo Love, DC, is indeed a licensed Chiropractor; License # 3658, and runs a business called “Deephaven Chiropractic, P.A”, located at 18281 Minnetonka Blvd, Wayzata, MN 55391, phone: (952) 475-0079 fax: (952) 475-1030, NPI # 1790882785. ‘Therefore by abuse of her license Tammy Love is calling in on the provider line at United Health Group and giving a bogus provider number to gain unauthorized access to Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s and her children’s protected Health Insurance information, This also shows that Tammy Love is aware the mother provides full coverage for the children, and is knowingly engaged in the MA fraud mentioned above. The mother also reporis that Tammy Love is engaged in other false public assistance claims regarding her daughter who she claims lives at the Ireland Place property in Lakeville, for which she would not be entitled. The home at Ireland Place was sold at sheriff sale on 11/15/2013 and is apparently vacant. Again since the County refuses to investigate the problem, and the State must instead investigate and recapture of these dollars.JUDGE KNUTSON’S ORDERS ARE NOT. MERELY “VOID-ABLE” THESE ORDERS ARE ALREADY VOID. UNDER THE UNIFORM CHILD JURISDICTION AND ENFORCEMENT ACT (UCCIEA) JUDGE DAVID KNUTSON CANNOT RENDER A CHILD SUPPORT- CUSTODY DECISION IN CASE NO. 19AV-FA-I1-1 273, IN FACT ALL OF DEFENDANT KNUTSON’S ORDERS ARE VOID. The Uniform Child Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCIEA) confers subject-matter Jurisdiction only to Minnesota district court rendering the initial child custody determination, and that the court retains continuing, exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction over all subsequent child-custody proceedings. In Case No. 19AV-FA-11-1273 the initial child custody determination was issued on May 12, 2011 by the court of Honorable Timothy D. Wermager, who retains “continuing, exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction over all child-custody proceedings. Under the UCCJEA jurisdictional component, Judge David Knutson has in fact lacked subject matter jurisdiction to issue any orders throughout the history of this case, and cannot render a child-custody decision nor modify or reserve child support. Most recently Judge Knutson’s supposed “custody” order dated November 25, 2013 was issued “Coram Non Judice” and it along with all other orders of Judge David Knutson in Case No. I9AV-FA-11-1273 are VOID for lack of Jurisdiction, Judge Knutson’s orders are not merely “void-able” these orders are already VOID. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER THE PARTIES IS NEVER PRESUMED AND MUST BE PROVEN. Judge Knutson cannot presume to assign himself jurisdiction in Case No. 19AV-FA-11- 1273. State and Federal Counts have consistently held that “unless the authority exists, the acts are Coram Non Judicel, and are VOID”. This rule is universal. .. The jurisdiction is never presumed. These are principles too familiar to require a reference to authorities.” (Emphasis added.) IN RE KAINE, 55 U.S. 103, 144 (1852) [W]hich are courts of limited jurisdiction and whose jurisdiction is never presumed but must always be found in the strict letter of the law. (Emphasis added.) WYNNE v. UNITED STATES, 217 U.S, 234 238 (1910) “Coram Non Judice, Latin for “before one who is nota judge," sa legal term typically used to indicate a legal Proceeding without a judge, with improper venue, or without jurisdiction. Any indictment or sentence passed by @ ‘court which has no authority to try an accused of that offence, is clearly in violation of the law and would be coram ‘non judice and a nullity. The exception ‘iudicis non su, ‘not his judge’ is available at any time, including after Judgment (Bracton),DEFENDANT KNUTSON’S FALSE PRESUMPTION OF JOURSDICTION ‘The record shows that throughout all the proceedings from July 14, 2011 to date, Judge Kautson has falsely and stubbornly presumed subject matter jurisdiction in Case No. ISAV-FA-11-1273. Yet the fact remains that Judge David Knutson had no authority to become “involved” in Case No. 19AV-FA-11-1273 on July 14, 2011, or to modify child support, All acts of Judge David Knutson are Coram Non Judice under the UCCJEA and are based on a false presumption of Jurisdiction over the parties. The record also shows Defendant Knutson has engaged in actual bias and has failed to provide a forum for testing subject matter jurisdiction. Judge Knutson’s child support order dated November 25, 2013 is VOID. The existing Child support Order was issued on May 12, 2011 by the Court of Honorable Timothy D. Wermager, who retains “continuing, exclusive subject- ‘matter jurisdiction over all child-custody proceedings. Jurisdictional Provisions of the UCCJEA There are two requirements under the UCCJEA for making or modifying a custody determination: (1) the court must have a basis of jurisdiction under the Act (ie., subject- matter jurisdiction), and (2) the parties must be given notice and opportunity to be heard. Personal jurisdiction over a party or child—based on physical presence in or minimum contacts with the State—is not required. Moreover, a court that has personal jurisdiction over a party or child cannot adjudicate custody unless it has a basis for exercising Jurisdiction under the Act. Throughout the history of this case, (and especially in regard to the most recent “order”) the following applies: “Defendants each committed separate acts, but that there was a "concert of action" in planning and execution”. “Defendant's failed to withdraw Jrom the conspiracy prior to the completion of an overt act.” “Additionally, Defendants are responsible for consequences of the conspiracy, whether they were part of the original agreement, or not. A conspirator that "procures or conspires with another to commit a crime .. .is guilty of everything done by his confederates which follows incidentally in the execution of the common design as one of its probable and natural consequences, even though it was not intended as part of the original plan." State v. Hurst, 193 N.W. 680, 684 (Minn. 1922). Judge Knutson’s orders are not merely “void-able” these orders are already VOID.Aten, sTvatgtt sac Authorization for Release of Child Support Information to a Third Party Date: (77 57aa73| Re: CUENTNAME (Prin = - . x ANDRA Serazzinix oak: [Boe BY S92 Purposet | give permission co a third party o discuss my child support case with the Child Support Enforcement vision of the Minnespta Department of Human Services (DHS) and the zs Doe Lete. ‘County child support office(s). I authorize DHS and the county child support office(s) to release private Information regarding my child support case to a third party. This is a: PA Pall release ~ These agencies may release all ofthe private information in my child supporc file that would be available to me. I understand that this may include data on payment information, arreats, interest, employer information, wage information, medical insurance or assistance, public asiscance, and other private data about me Partial release ~ These agencies may release only che following type(s) of private information, Spersy here ig) —_) (Avene, Afchetle Cuvil Rights Adweaafe | LS eee ‘(Corazzini al Mberess Authorization for Release of information Giving Permission: | give permission for DHS and the county child support office to discuss private information concerning my child support case with the person or entity/agency listed above who would not otherwise be entitled to the information. ‘This information is used to allow a third party access to assist in resolving any issues involving my child support case. I understand that I am not required to have a third patty look at my case Consequences: State and Federal privacy laws protect my records. | know: = Why Lam being asked to share/release this information Ido not have to consent to this authorization, but it may affect my child support services if 1 do not give my consent 1 Sl wm bevng infcemation toon slecied oli nal ensheer of coe lacie be sea aaa © Generally, [ must give my written consent for the listed agencies to give out my private information, but ifI do not consent, the information will not be released unless the law otherwise allows it I may stop this authorization with a written notice at any time, but this written notice will not affect information the agencies have already shared/requested ‘The person of agency/entity who gets my information may be able to pass it on to others If my information is passed on to others by DHS, it may no longer be protected by this authorization, ‘This authorization will end one year from che date I sign it, unless the law allows for a longer period. [PR nolan Meagine Mich eo asHotline Form Page 1 of 1 WE aren etre ecw rinenta ert) incinaen weed nee eee oars Provide as much information about the suspected fraud as poss chances to prove welfare fraud. le below. More information increases the First [Tammy Middle Name: [fo Last Name: [Love ‘Name: - Date Of ———————_ Phone rasa ogre Numban® [952-476-0078 ‘Address: [18281 Minnetonka Bivd, City: [Wayzata, State: [MN ZIP Code: [55391 Please [ramy Jo Love is engaged in MA fraud and is receiving Medical Assistance describe |Grant/month: $477.36 since September 2013 on behalf of the Rucki children who do A lnct quality for MA and do not live with her. In addition Tammy Love has an me Jestablished pattern duplicity and frauds that includes abuse of her license as suspected chiropractor for unauthorized access the children’s mother Sandra Grazzini-Rucki’s fraud: [health insurance information that the mother provides for the children. The v es dea full fox the childs re ts to he taxed al: a Ifyou want to leave your name and phone number, please enter below (optional). First Name: Smmberey Middle Name: 2 Lt Nene: (Basta Phone = Numbon 651-886-6664 Email: {rule1tstilappies@hotmail com Verification Insirutions © 2014 Minnesota Department of Human Services. Privacy Notice MN.IT@DHS.NET Applications https://fraudhotline.dhs.mn.gov/ 1/12/2014Submit Page | of 1 + hes: | Minnesota Department of Human Services minnesota north Star) Minnesota Fraud Hotline Form Sunday, January 12, 2014 Information Submitted Successfully ‘Your information has been submitted successfully. Thank you for using the Minnesota Fraud Hotline website. Your information will be referred to a state or county investigator. © 2014 Minnesota Department of Human Services. Privacy Notice MN.IT@DHS.NET Applications https://fraudhotline.dhs.mn.gow/Submit.aspx 1/12/2014[ HP LaserJet Professional M1212nf MFP | Fax Confirmation Job Date Time_— Type. Identification Duration Pages Result 1022 01/12/2014 07:43:11AM Send 6514317601 14:16 27 oK LYS “oF FRzue/ On : No Image Available