USCC / CRIS / DUNS / Clearfield Doctrine

Information and Memorandum of Law

Good Day My Fellow Americans: In the Spirit of Isaiah Chapter 61, I am sharing the following information. It is past time
for us to wake up and walk in the truth regarding our God given rights to Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness. In the
early 90's, I created some historical charts tracing the "Black" heritage in the Bible. This information is what led me to
find out about the UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY and the fraud of the Corporate Courts which are
private franchises of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY. This is not a black or white matter but it is an
American concern that is affecting ALL Americans directly or indirectly. The study of my heritage just happened to be the
connection that bought me into this knowledge. I have posted several links for you to do your own study and research and
make your conclusions accordingly. However, because CORPORATIONS have been masquerading as GOVERNMENTS,
for over 100 years, numerous RACKETEERING INFLUENCED CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS (R.I.C.O.) crimes
Americans. Agents of these private-for profit CORPORATIONS have committed fraud by misrepresentation and nondisclosure of their private-for profit status and are running a Global Human Trafficking Slave Market. Through their
private owned court and prison systems they are trading men, women and children under armed threat duress and
coercion, and making billions of dollars in profit. This is in violation of the Organic Constitutions for the united states for
America as well as the Organic Constitutions of each and every Sovereign State of the Union. Also, this private for profit
global shave trade is a violation of the private copyright codes and statutes of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION
COMPANY as well.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-96
Due to these violations, every judgment placed against any American must be reversed and Americans must be
compensated for the damages of these crimes. Various articles on the fraud of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION by
Judge Anna Von Reitz:
http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm
http://www.freedom-school.com/the-united-states-is-a-corporation.html
UNITED STATES THE CORPORATION:THE TRUTH FOX NEWS WILL NOT TELL YOU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hgyztsj7O6M
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=the+united+states+is+a+corporation+not+a+country

UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY (USCC)

1. Definition(s) of United States and UNITED STATES and United States of America and UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA (Note the date and by what entity--- an acting Congress during the Civil War---this was done):
o

o
o

1864-- the acting Congress passed an Act changing the meaning of "state, States and United States" to
mean "the territories and District of Columbia". (13 Stat. 223, 306, ch. 173, sec. 182, June 30,
1864. [US Territories---- portions of the United States that are not within the limits of any state and
have not been admitted as states. Includes all federal installationsmilitary bases, docks, courthouses,
etc.]
This was never changed, amended or appealed, so, all references to state, States, and United States in
Federal Code that are not otherwise specifically defined, must be construed as the territories and District
of Columbia.
One must also make a distinction between the meaning of the words used prior to and then after the
passage of this 1864 corporate law.

Prior to this, state, States, and United States meant what we commonly still believe them to mean--after 1864 in Federal Codethey generally meant something entirely different and opposed to the
popular meaning.

2. Three Crucial Definitions, Plus a Fourth in Commerce:

o

The term "United States" may be used in any one of several senses. (1) It may be merely the name of a
sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations. (2) It may
designate the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States (that is, the territories and District
of Columbia) extends, or (3) it may be the collective name of the states which are united by and under the
Constitution. --- Hooven and Allison Company v. Evatt, 324 US 652 (1945) (This is also the verbatim
definition of United States given in Blacks Law Dictionary, 6 th Edition.)

Additionally.... we have definition (4) The Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, Forty-first Congress,
Session III, Chapter 62, page 419, Congress chartered a Federal Company entitled "United States," a/k/a
"US Inc.," a "Commercial Agency" originally designated as "Washington, D.C.," in accordance with the
14th Amendment [which the record indicates was never ratified--- see Utah Supreme Court Cases, Dyett v
Turner, (1968) 439 P2d 266, 267; State v Phillips, (1975) 540 P 2d 936; as well as Coleman v. Miller, 307
U.S. 448, 59 S. Ct. 972; 28; Tulane Law Review, 22; 11 South Carolina Law Quarterly 484.]

Please note: that The Act of 1871 ---An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia, ch.
62, 16 Stat. 419, February 21, 1871 --- was repealed in 1874 and then passed piecemeal via these
actions---- An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of Columbia, ch. 180,
sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward
from the Act of 1871, as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved March 9,
1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia . . . 187374 (in force as
of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1
(Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)) .

3. When looking at the intent of all this, given that the actual District of Columbia was set up in 1790 and fully
chartered by 1801, the aim of the Act of 1871 is, as it must be, merely to set up U.S. Corp--o

That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of
Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of
Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes and
exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation. Act of 1871 verbiage---

So the Act of 1871 was to create a private corporation owned by the actual government of the District of
Columbia--- thus the birth of the infamous District of Columbia Municipal Corporation:

4. The only government created by the Act of 1871 was that of any private corporation which determines its own
administrative rules and structures.......that is, the U.S. Corp dba UNITED STATES is not merely the name of an
incorporated municipality (District of Columbia) --- it is the name of a private corporation (District of Columbia
Municipal Corporation) that was created by the acting Congress via the Act of 1877 and as amended ever since. Few
Americans realize that there are all these definitions for the "United States." Most have been misled to believe that the
term "United States" has a single meaning and is a generic term referring to the country as a whole -- However, in Title
28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C), it stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is also the name of a corporation, as
just demonstrated from the public records.

5. Does the UNITED STATES the private corporation operating the government of the Territories and District of
Columbia have citizens?

1873: U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) "The term resident and citizen of the United States (United
States meaning territories and District of Columbia) is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the
several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress." (That is a citizen of
the United States is a statutory citizencreated by legislative action.)

1875 - This definition of "United States" as a Corporation has its own citizens (see United States v.
Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542) who are generally referred to as United States citizens.

1953 - Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F. Supp 383 "A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal
government

1967 - Also Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646): A "citizen of the United States" is
a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private
constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA
and US Inc. in Section 4. [This neatly explains once and for all what a citizen of the United States is in
federal parlance, as opposed to popular speech].

6. The same duplicitous word smithing was done with the words United States of America From A Law
Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier, published 1856:
o

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (First meaning given): (1) The name of this country. [That is, the
actual land mass.] The United States, now thirty-one in number, are Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut,
Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia,
Wisconsin, and California.

(Fifth meaning): (5)The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue
and be sued, to convey and receive property, 1 Marsh, Dec. 177, 181, but it is proper to observe that no
suit can be brought against the United States without authority of law.

7. The UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANYs dba (Doing Business As) listing, Articles of
Incorporation, and Annual Reports can be found at Sunbiz.Org (cut and paste links below):
o

http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?
inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=UNITEDSTATES
%201000090&aggregateId=domp-100009-5f172c55-c788-4f81-aa28-1a68b778486b&searchTerm=UNITED
%20STATES&listNameOrder=UNITEDSTATES%201000090

UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANYs (Florida Profit Corporation) Registered Agents are THE
PRENTICE-HALL CORPORATION SYSTEM, INC (Foreign Profit Corporation):

http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?
inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=PRENTICEHALLSYSTEM
%208070890&aggregateId=forp-807089-05466d63-5ddc-4d95-a8d3-9344092bd775&searchTerm=THE
%20PRENTICE-HALL%20CORPORATION%20SYSTEM%2C
%20INC&listNameOrder=PRENTICEHALLSYSTEM%208070890

and CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY (Foreign Profit Corporation), all of them registered as doing business
out of 1201 HAYS STREET,TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301, and with the same President / Director Rodman Ward III,
Secretary George A. Massih III, and Treasurer John Fortunado, Jr. at 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400,
Wilmington, Delaware 19808:
o

http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?
inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=SERVICE%20P265050&aggregateId=forpp26505-f13e5e1f-6a3e-48f8-8da0-c75a76b35a4d&searchTerm=CORPORATION%20SERVICE
%20COMPANY&listNameOrder=SERVICE%201400790

COURT REGISTRY INVESTMENT SYSTEM (CRIS)

8. Back in 1990, Federal judges and clerks down in South Texas cooked up the Court Registry Investment System
(CRIS), on the recommendation of financial analyst (now Clerk) Mike Milby, and with permission of the U.S. Treasury
and Federal Reserve Board of Governors. The pooled funds never actually leave the US Treasury account in the Texas
Commerce Bank of Houston because the Bank invests them in US Treasury Bills through CRIS investment managers at
JP Morgan which trades them on the international stock market and Forex (foreign exchange) market. Thus all 25
member US Court Districts always have funds available to disburse for their various purposes (cut and paste links)[also
attached hereto]:
o
o
o
o
o

1990-46
Order Establishing the Court Registry Investment System (CRIS) - Term Fund
1990-48
Amended Order Establishing the Court Registry Investment System (CRIS) - Term Fund
1990-45
Order for Assessment of a Management Fee on Funds Placed in the Court Registry
1990-48
Amended Order Establishing the Court Registry Investment System (CRIS) - Term Fund
http://www.txs.uscourts.gov/district/genord#1990

9. Not only does the court have several billion dollars in the pool and over a billion dollars invested at any one time,
but also it earns upwards of a million dollars a month in interest alone. And it charges a registry fee of upwards of 10%
for managing the investment (rather than taking the fees out of earnings). Member District Courts share proportionately
in CRIS earnings.

10. Court Registry Investment System (CRIS) monetizes all court orders and case information by way of General
Services Administration (GSA) Form AO 290, Form AO 283, Form AO 274, Standard Form (SF) 1166, SF-28, Optional
Form (OF) 90, OF-91, SF-24, SF-25, SF-25A, SF-273, SF-274, SF-275, SF-1402, SF-1414, SF-1416, SF-1418, CUSIP
Numbers, CRIS Debit Vouchers, District Court Master Clearing Account Statements, and other private commercial paper
(cut and paste link)[also attached hereto]:
o

https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/case-monetization-cris_report-07-2003-b.pdf

11. The above-linked document shows how federal courts earn interest on the money they receive in fees, fines, etc.
Basically they invest the money, presumably on petition from the payor, through the South Texas USDC CRIS.
Procedures begin on page 36. Pages 44 through 59 provide flow charts showing how CRIS administers the money through
JP Morgan (which gets a nice fee for the service). Page 64 contains the excerpt from the Federal Register. Pages 65 and 66
give the CRIS investment pool summary for 2006.

DUN & BRADSTREET (D&B)

D-U-N-S (Data Universal Number System)NUMBER
12. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. (NYSE: DNB) is an American public company headquartered in Short Hills, a
community in Millburn, New Jersey that provides commercial data to businesses on credit history, business-to-business
sales and marketing, counterparty risk exposure, supply chain management, lead scoring and social identity matching.
Often referred to as D&B, the companys database contains information on more than 235 million companies across 200
countries worldwide. Dun & Bradstreet has been listed on the Fortune 500 and was one of the first companies to be
publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange.
13. The following is directly from the Dun and Bradstreet website (http://www.dnb.com/about-us.html):
o

Our Company For nearly two centuries, Dun & Bradstreet has helped our customers and partners build their
most valuable relationships by uncovering truth and meaning from data. Our nearly 5,000 employees around the
world are dedicated to this unique purpose, and we are guided by important values that make us the established
leader in commercial data and insight.

Our Data At Dun & Bradstreet, we know that sound business decisions begin with sound information, Thats
why weve compiled the most comprehensive and accurate repository of business data on the planet and we are
putting it to work to help identify and connect your most valuable business relationships. With more than 30,000
global data sources, we turn the data into insights that will help you succeed.

Our Analytics With rich proprietary data assets, unique capabilities and a world-class team of data scientists,
Dun & Bradstreet illuminates the path to growth. We apply the latest statistical technologies and methodologies
to build the highest performing predictors, ratings, scores, and advanced analytic models, helping you connect
with the prospectus, customers, and suppliers that matter the most.

Our Customers In todays market, companies need to be more data-savvy than ever. Thats why nearly 90% of
the Fortune 500, and companies of every size around the world, rely on our data analytics and insights. Learn
from the ways our customers streamline operations, manage risk, improve targeting, find quality leads, boost
customer relationships and most of all grow.

D-U-N-S (Data Universal Number System) NUMBER (http://www.dnb.com/duns-number.html) The D&B DU-N-S Number is a unique nine digit identifier for businesses. It is used to establish a business credit file, which
is often referenced by lenders and potential business partners to help predict the reliability and/or financial
stability of the company in question. D-U-N-S, which stands for Data Universal Number System, is used to
maintain accurate and timely information on +250M global businesses. The D-U-N-S Number has been referred
to as the Social Security number for businesses. In reality, its even more pervasive than Social Security. The
system is used in dozens of countries around the world, including the U.S., Australia, and European Union, and
confers numerous benefits on businesses that participate. The business credit file associated with your business
D-U-N-S Number can help potential partners and lenders learn about your business and make informed decisions
about whether or not to work with you as a client, supplier or partner. Even after youve signed a contract or
accepted a loan, your D-U-N-S Number can be used to help get a clear view of your business, which can help you
negotiate for improved terms and conditions or a favorable line of credit.

THE CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE

Clearfield Trust Company v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 - 371 (1942)
14. Clearfield Trust Company v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 - 371 (1942) is a Supreme Court case that is Res
Judicata and Stare Decisis. It provides "Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the
characteristics of a mere private citizen... where private commercial paper (Federal Reserve Notes, GSA bonds, etc.) and
securities (checks) are concerned." "For the purpose of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities
entirely separate from government."
15. Clearfield Trust Company v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 - 371 (1942), or "The Clearfield Doctrine" is saying
that when private commercial paper is used by corporate government (Court Registry Investment System CRIS), or
when private commercial paper is demanded for any payment by government (CRIS), then government loses its
sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private (for profit) corporation. The subject matter of the EVERY
court case in the U.S (civil, criminal, bankruptcy). even state cases involve the use of private commercial paper and
demand for payment in private commercial paper through the use of Court Registry Investment System CRIS.
16. As such, the private for profit corporation (government) then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern
private corporations which means that if it intends to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon its
corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government, like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-duecourse of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon who demands for specific performance
are made. And further, the government must be willing to enter the valid and verifiable contract or commercial
agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands called statutes which are private copyright
rules of the private corporation.
17. This Clearfield Doctrine case is important because it is a 1942 case that was decided after the UNITED STATES
CORPORATION COMPANY filed its "CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION" in the State of Florida (Tallahassee) on
July 15, 1925 (see link and attached UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY Certificate of Incorporation and
Annual Reports). Also, it was decided after the "corporate government" agreed to use the currency of the private
corporation, the FEDERAL RESERVE. The private currency, the Federal Reserve Note, is still in use today and it along
with other private commercial paper is involved in the subject matter of ALL court cases in the U.S. through the use of
CRIS.
18. Because of their demand for and use of private commercial paper through CRIS, the UNITED STATES
CORPORATION COMPANY and its officers, agents, employees, successors, and assigns in active participation or acting

in concert with them lose the status of public constitutional authority and are mere private for-profit corporations. The
laws created by government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes, and
ordinances to conceal their true nature (fraud by misrepresentation and non-disclosure).
19. This UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY and its officers, agents, employees, successors, and
assigns in active participation or acting in concert with them have no standing to promulgate or enforce "criminal laws."
They can only create and enforce "civil laws," which are duty bound to comply with the Law of Contracts. The Law of
Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency. No one has never agreed to be tried under
any of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY'S corporate statutes, and, no one has never signed a
contract with the UNITED STATES UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY agreeing to be sued for
violating their corporate regulations.
20. Enforcement of corporate statutes by local, state, and federal corporate policy enforcement officers are unlawful
actions being committed against The People, and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions of
infringement upon The People's constitutionally secured and protected rights and civil liberties (see Bond v. United States,
529 U.S. 334 (2000)) (see 17 U.S.C 501 - 513; 15 U.S.C. 1; 15 U.S.C. 2; 15 U.S.C. 1114; 15 U.S.C. 1125; 18
U.S.C. 1001; 18 U.S.C. 1341; 18 U.S.C. 1342; 18 U.S.C. 3571; 28 U.S.C. 1498; 18 U.S.C. 241; 18 U.S.C.
242).

- KONSCIOUS VIBES W / Rahme'el El Bey : The Clearfield Doctrine and How To Use It
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrLpIZ83Wkk

- ----- ----------------

-NEW!!! Taj Tarik Bey Round Table "The Original Clearfield Doctrine Revealed"
-----------------------------------------https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOeCC8MA_9U
-THE UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY
----------------------------------------------https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRnogqeqzxk
-The Clearfield Doctrine: Clearfield Trust Company v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 - 371 (1942)
- http://www.rocklarochelle.org/documents/clearfield-doctrine.pdf
-The Clearfield Doctrine: Clearfield Trust Company v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 - 371 (1942)
----------------------------https://www.scribd.com/doc/193011835/Clearfield-Doctrine-Clearfield-TrustCo-v-United-States-318-Us-363-1942
-The Clearfield Doctrine: Clearfield Trust Company v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 - 371 (1942)
----------------------------https://scannedretina.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/1942-clearfield-doctrine.pdf