Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
diet and a higher-fat DASH diet on blood pressure and lipids and
lipoproteins: a randomized controlled trial13
Sally Chiu,4 Nathalie Bergeron,4,5 Paul T Williams,4 George A Bray,4 Barbara Sutherland,4 and Ronald M Krauss4*
Childrens Hospital Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, CA; and 5College of Pharmacy, Touro University California, Vallejo, CA
ABSTRACT
Background: The DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) dietary pattern, which is high in fruit, vegetables, and low-fat
dairy foods, significantly lowers blood pressure as well as low-density
lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol.
Objective: The study was designed to test the effects of substituting
full-fat for low-fat dairy foods in the DASH diet, with a corresponding increase in fat and a reduction in sugar intake, on blood pressure
and plasma lipids and lipoproteins.
Design: This was a 3-period randomized crossover trial in freeliving healthy individuals who consumed in random order a control
diet, a standard DASH diet, and a higher-fat, lower-carbohydrate
modification of the DASH diet (HF-DASH diet) for 3 wk each, separated by 2-wk washout periods. Laboratory measurements, which
included lipoprotein particle concentrations determined by ion
mobility, were made at the end of each experimental diet.
Results: Thirty-six participants completed all 3 dietary periods.
Blood pressure was reduced similarly with the DASH and HFDASH diets compared with the control diet. The HF-DASH diet
significantly reduced triglycerides and large and medium very-lowdensity lipoprotein (VLDL) particle concentrations and increased
LDL peak particle diameter compared with the DASH diet. The
DASH diet, but not the HF-DASH diet, significantly reduced LDL
cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I, intermediatedensity lipoprotein and large LDL particles, and LDL peak diameter
compared with the control diet.
Conclusions: The HF-DASH diet lowered blood pressure to the same
extent as the DASH diet but also reduced plasma triglyceride and
VLDL concentrations without significantly increasing LDL cholesterol.
This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01404897.
Am J Clin Nutr 2016;103:3417.
Keywords: DASH diet, lipoproteins, saturated fat, triglyceride,
blood pressure, dairy
INTRODUCTION
Am J Clin Nutr 2016;103:3417. Printed in USA. 2016 American Society for Nutrition
341
Supplemental Material can be found at:
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/suppl/2015/12/29/ajcn.115.1
23281.DCSupplemental.html
342
CHIU ET AL.
A 3-period randomized crossover study in free-living participants was conducted between August 2011 and December 2013
at our clinical research center in Berkeley, California. The participants consumed a 1-wk run-in diet, consisting of a mixture of
2 or 3 d of each experimental diet, and then consumed in random
order a control diet, a standard DASH diet, and a higher-fat,
lower-carbohydrate modification of the DASH diet (HF-DASH
diet) for 3 wk each. Each experimental diet was separated by
a 2-wk washout period, during which participants ate their own
foods but continued to abstain from alcohol. Participants were
assigned their diet sequence in randomly determined blocks of
3, 6, 9, or 12 individuals by using a uniform random-number
generator. Diet sequences were kept in sealed envelopes and
assigned to the participant by the study nutritionist 12 d before
starting the first experimental diet. Participants were blinded to
diet order, but because of the nature of the diets they were likely
able to identify each diet. Clinic personnel were not blinded to
diet order. Laboratory personnel and investigators were blinded
to diet order, and unblinding was performed after data collection
before analysis. Participants met with study staff weekly for
counseling, to receive study foods, and to be weighed. At the
end of each experimental diet, participants visited the clinic on
2 consecutive days for clinical and laboratory measurements. In
addition, a fasting blood sample was taken after each washout
period to document a return to baseline for standard lipid and BP
measurements.
TABLE 1
Participant characteristics at screening1
Women
(n = 15)
Age, y
BMI, kg/m2
Body fat, %
Waist circumference, cm
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg
Triglycerides, mmol/L
Cholesterol, mmol/L
Total
LDL
HDL
Glucose, mmol/L
Men
(n = 21)
50
26.8
35.5
92
136
85
1.08
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
12
3.8
6.3
10
13
5
0.47
45
28.2
26.2
99
133
84
1.32
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
14
3.5
7.7
11
10
4
0.86
0.28
0.26
0.0003
0.04
0.51
0.37
0.30
5.13
2.90
1.74
5.44
6
6
6
6
0.91
0.67
0.34
0.39
4.30
2.46
1.17
5.44
6
6
6
6
0.80
0.60
0.31
0.44
0.008
0.05
,0.0001
0.89
Dietary provision
The Bionutrition Core of the University of California, San
Francisco, Clinical and Translational Science Institute developed
and prepared diets for a 3-d cycle menu at 5 levels of energy
intake (1800, 2100, 2600, 3100, and 3600 kcal). Participants
whose energy needs were between main-menu calorie levels
received unit foods (100 kcal) that matched the macronutrient and
mineral content of the experimental diets. The control and DASH
diets were designed to match the characteristics of the diets used
in the original DASH trial (1, 1416). The higher-fat and lowercarbohydrate content of the HF-DASH diet was achieved by
replacing nonfat and low-fat dairy with full-fat dairy products,
mostly in the form of whole milk, cheese, and yogurt, and by
reducing sugars, mostly from fruit juices, which constituted
59% of total fruit intake in the DASH diet (14). The DASH and
HF-DASH patterns were otherwise developed by using similar
recipes and foods, provided in different amounts to meet each
diet specification. As in the original trial design, emphasis was
placed on an abundance of fruit and vegetables; increased whole
grains and dairy products; limited servings of meat, poultry, and
fish; and inclusion of nuts, seeds, and legumes several times
weekly (Table 2). The nutrient composition of the diets was
initially assessed by using Nutrition Data System for Research
Software (NDSR 2010; Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota) and validated by compositional analysis of
the 3-d cycle menus (Covance Laboratories) (Table 2). The
sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, and fiber contents
of the DASH and HF-DASH patterns were similar; the diets
differed only in the amount of total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol,
and carbohydrate they provided (Table 2). A sample 1-d menu is
shown in Supplemental Table 1.
Dietary control was achieved by providing participants with
2 standardized entres and accompanying side dishes daily
(lunch, dinner, and some snacks), representing w50% of
total energy. Detailed menus, shopping lists, and food preparation instructions were provided for the remaining food items
(mostly dairy, produce, and cereal products) to be purchased and
prepared at home. Participants were required to come to the
Study population
47
14
38
16
14
8
253
3052
1906
193
429
19
141
55
17
27
8
12
7
160
2752
4575
469
1278
48
158
HF-DASH
43
18
40
14
18
8
221
2720
4631
465
1324
42
93
5.8
0.9
1.9
2.3
3.5
0.7
0
0
0.7
20.4
5.0
3.3
3.7
1.6
2.0
0.9
1.9
2.6
0
2.4
5.2
1.4
5.0
1.9
2.1
0.7
2.4
0
2.5
0.4
10.1
6.7
11.9
Values are shown for a 1-wk 2100-kcal menu and are based on compositional analysis (Covance Laboratories) unless otherwise stated. DASH,
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet; HF-DASH, high-fat, lowcarbohydrate DASH diet; oz, ounces; tsp, teaspoons.
2
Calculated values (Nutrition Data System for Research Software 2010;
Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota).
3
Food group servings based on choosemyplate.org. Equivalencies in
metric units are as follows: 1 oz = 28 g; 1 cup = 250 mL; 1 tsp = 5 mL.
4
Based on 1-oz equivalents.
Statistical analysis
The primary objective was to compare the DASH and HFDASH diets for lipid and lipoprotein measurements. At 80% power,
an n of 36 would yield a minimum detectable difference between diets of 0.14 mmol/L for LDL cholesterol (SD of response =
0.30 mmol/L), 0.04 g/L for apoB (SD of response = 0.09 g/L),
0.03 mmol/L for HDL cholesterol (SD of response = 0.07 mmol/L),
4.1 mm Hg for systolic BP (SD of response = 8.6 mm Hg), and
clinic weekly to pick up study foods, submit receipts documenting study food purchases, and to meet with the nutritionist
to assess compliance with the dietary protocol and adjust energy
intake to maintain a stable weight (within 3% of baseline, 610
pounds maximum). They were also required to maintain their
usual physical activity levels during the study and to monitor
daily steps by pedometer. Compliance was assessed by measuring 24-h urinary potassium at the end of the second week of
each experimental diet. Twenty-four-hour urinary sodium was
measured as an indicator of sodium intake.
Experimental measurements
After each 3-wk dietary period, body weight and waist and hip
circumference were measured and the percentage of body fat was
assessed by bioimpedance (TBF 551 body-weight scale; Tanita).
BP was measured at the clinic by using a Dinamap monitor (GE
Pro 100 or Critikon Pro 300) after the second week of each diet
and on 2 consecutive days at the end of each experimental diet,
and the 3 values were averaged. At each instance, BP was
measured in a sitting position after 5 min rest 3 times, and the last
2 measurements were averaged. Participants were also provided
with a portable BP cuff (Model BP791IT, Omron Healthcare, Inc)
Carbohydrate, % of energy
Protein, % of energy
Fat, % of energy
SFAs
MUFAs
PUFAs
Cholesterol, mg
Sodium, mg
Potassium, mg
Magnesium, mg
Calcium, mg
Fiber, g
Total sugar,2 g
Food groups3
Grains,4 servings/d
Fruit and juices, cups/d
Vegetables, cups/d
Beef, oz/d
Poultry, oz/d
Fish, oz/d
Nuts and legumes, oz/d
Low-fat dairy, cups/d
Full-fat dairy, cups/d
Sugar from sweets and
sugar-sweetened drinks, tsp/d
Fats, tsp/d
Control
343
344
CHIU ET AL.
RESULTS
Effects of diets on BP
Study participants
DASH
Control
Treatment
Carry-forward
Period
Sequence
125.0
79.0
1.15
4.53
2.65
1.36
3.16
1.35
0.76
22.3
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
0.8
0.5a
0.04a
0.06a
0.05a,b
0.02a,b
0.06
0.01a,b
0.01
0.0a
125.4
78.3
1.32
4.51
2.60
1.32
3.19
1.32
0.76
22.1
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
0.8
0.5a
0.04b
0.06a
0.05a
0.02a
0.06
0.01a
0.01
0.0b
128.8
81.2
1.20
4.76
2.81
1.40
3.36
1.38
0.80
22.2
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
0.8
0.5b
0.04a,b
0.06b
0.05b
0.02b
0.06
0.01b
0.01
0.0a
0.0001
0.0001
0.03
0.02
0.04
0.03
0.10
0.02
0.22
0.004
0.0001
0.0001
0.99
0.65
0.29
0.29
0.32
0.17
0.28
0.81
0.004
0.09
0.18
0.11
0.09
0.14
0.12
0.63
0.02
0.42
0.91
0.63
0.25
0.86
0.79
0.47
0.44
0.42
0.43
0.23
97.8
12.9
39.2
45.8
243
6
6
6
6
6
2.5
0.4a
1.1a
1.2
5a,b
105.0
14.8
43.2
47.0
237
6
6
6
6
6
2.5
0.4b
1.1b
1.2
5a
104.4
14.0
42.2
48.2
259
6
6
6
6
6
2.5
0.4a,b
1.1a,b
1.2
5b
0.15
0.02
0.04
0.39
0.02
0.85
0.97
0.84
0.64
0.51
0.35
0.25
0.37
0.51
0.85
0.71
0.45
0.61
0.90
0.94
702
433
119
101
185
6
6
6
6
6
14
11a,b
4
4
5
716
414
123
106
201
6
6
6
6
6
14
11a
4
4
5
744
468
130
104
185
6
6
6
6
6
14
11b
4
4
5
0.44
0.004
0.78
0.77
0.12
0.10
0.10
0.01
0.69
0.72
0.06
0.16
0.003
0.34
0.61
0.46
0.92
0.42
0.17
0.36
0.32
0.20
0.45
0.94
0.25
0.60
0.67
0.33
0.27
0.80
0.77
0.75
15,191 6 184
3960 6 70
11,231 6 130
15,066 6 183
3893 6 70
11,173 6 130
15,467 6 183
4038 6 69
11,429 6 129
Values are means 6 SEs; n = 36. Data were analyzed by ANOVA for a 3-treatment crossover design. Values in the same row not sharing a superscript
letter differ from each other, P , 0.017 (Bonferroni adjustment for 3 pairwise comparisons). apo A-I, apolipoprotein A-I; apoB, apolipoprotein B; BP, blood
pressure; DASH, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet; HF-DASH, high-fat, low-carbohydrate DASH diet; IDL, intermediate-density lipoprotein.
1
DISCUSSION
FIGURE 3 Differences between diets for plasma triglycerides (A), VLDL concentrations (large, medium, small) (B), and LDL peak diameter (C). *P ,
0.017, **P , 0.001. Values are means 6 SEs, adjusted for dietary period; n = 36. Data were analyzed by ANOVA for a 3-treatment crossover design. DASH,
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet; HF-DASH, high-fat, low-carbohydrate DASH diet.
345
346
CHIU ET AL.
REFERENCES
1. Appel LJ, Moore TJ, Obarzanek E, Vollmer WM, Svetkey LP, Sacks FM,
Bray GA, Vogt TM, Cutler JA, Windhauser MM, et al; DASH Collaborative Research Group. A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns
on blood pressure. N Engl J Med 1997;336:111724.
2. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, Appel LJ, Bray GA, Harsha D,
Obarzanek E, Conlin PR, Miller ER III, Simons-Morton DG, et al;
DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. Effects on blood
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16. Vogt TM, Appel LJ, Obarzanek E, Moore TJ, Vollmer WM, Svetkey LP,
Sacks FM, Bray GA, Cutler JA, Windhauser MM, et al; DASH Collaborative Research Group. Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension: rationale, design, and methods. J Am Diet Assoc 1999;99(8 Suppl):S128.
17. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of
the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18:499502.
18. Rifai N, King ME. Immunoturbidimetric assays of apolipoproteins A,
AI, AII, and B in serum. Clin Chem 1986;32:95761.
19. Smith SJ, Cooper GR, Henderson LO, Hannon WH. An international
collaborative study on standardization of apolipoproteins A-I and B.
Part I. Evaluation of a lyophilized candidate reference and calibration
material. Clin Chem 1987;33:22409.
20. Caulfield MP, Li S, Lee G, Blanche PJ, Salameh WA, Benner WH,
Reitz RE, Krauss RM. Direct determination of lipoprotein particle
sizes and concentrations by ion mobility analysis. Clin Chem 2008;54
(8):130716.
21. Mora S, Caulfield MP, Wohlgemuth J, Chen Z, Superko HR, Rowland
CM, Glynn RJ, Ridker PM, Krauss RM. Atherogenic lipoprotein
subfractions determined by ion mobility and first cardiovascular events
after random allocation to high-intensity statin or placebo: the JUPITER
trial. Circulation 2015;132(23):22209.
22. Musunuru K, Orho-Melander M, Caulfield MP, Li S, Salameh WA,
Reitz RE, Berglund G, Hedblad B, Engstrom G, Williams PT, et al. Ion
mobility analysis of lipoprotein subfractions identifies three independent axes of cardiovascular risk. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
2009;29(11):197580.
23. Te Morenga LA, Howatson AJ, Jones RM, Mann J. Dietary sugars and
cardiometabolic risk: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of the effects on blood pressure and lipids.
Am J Clin Nutr 2014;100(1):6579.
24. Siri-Tarino PW, Chiu S, Bergeron N, Krauss RM. Saturated fats versus
polyunsaturated fats versus carbohydrates for cardiovascular disease
prevention and treatment. Annu Rev Nutr 2015;35:51743.
25. Krauss RM, Blanche PJ, Rawlings RS, Fernstrom HS, Williams PT.
Separate effects of reduced carbohydrate intake and weight loss on
atherogenic dyslipidemia. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;83(5):102531; quiz:
205.
26. Havel RJ, Rapaport E. Management of primary hyperlipidemia. N Engl
J Med 1995;332:14918.
27. Krauss RM, Williams PT, Lindgren FT, Wood PD. Coordinate changes
in levels of human serum low and high density lipoprotein subclasses
in healthy men. Arteriosclerosis 1988;8:15562.
28. Dreon DM, Fernstrom HA, Williams PT, Krauss RM. A very low-fat
diet is not associated with improved lipoprotein profiles in men with
a predominance of large, low-density lipoproteins. Am J Clin Nutr
1999;69:4118.
29. Roussell MA, Hill AM, Gaugler TL, West SG, Heuvel JP, Alaupovic P,
Gillies PJ, Kris-Etherton PM. Beef in an Optimal Lean Diet Study:
effects on lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins. Am J Clin Nutr
2012;95:916.
30. Sayer RD, Wright AJ, Chen N, Campbell WW. Dietary Approaches to
Stop Hypertension diet retains effectiveness to reduce blood pressure
when lean pork is substituted for chicken and fish as the predominant
source of protein. Am J Clin Nutr 2015;102(2):3028.
7.
347