Sunteți pe pagina 1din 338

Netami Stuart

Project Coordinator
Landscape Architect
Parks, Forestry and Recreation
Janie Romoff, General Manager

Parks Development/Capital Projects


Metro Hall, 24th Floor
55 John Street
Toronto, Ontario, M5V 3C6

Tel: 416-338-3327
Fax:416.392-3355
E-mail: nstuart@toronto.ca

DATE:

December 16, 2015

TO:

Joanne Kehoe, Manager Construction Services


Purchasing & Materials Management Division
Attn: Mike Voelker, Senior Corporate Buyer

FROM:

Netami Stuart, Project Coordinator Landscape Architect, PF&R PD&CP

RE:

Humber Bay Park Master Plan & Phase 1 Implementation RFP


Request for Proposals #9118-15-5046

The above noted Request for Proposals closed on September 30, 2015 and seven (7) proposals were
reviewed. The 5-member evaluation team completed its evaluation of the submissions against the criteria
set out in the Request for Proposals and the three firms of DTAH, The Planning Partnership and GH3
passed the technical evaluation.
The second envelope was opened for each of these three proponents and the scores were adjusted
accordingly. The results are summarized below.
Rank
1.
2.
3.

Proponent
DTAH
The Planning Partnership
GH3

Score (including Fee)


87.15%
85.22%
80.47%

Fee
$295,238.49
$387,024.89
$322.050.00

I have attached the Proposal Evaluation Spreadsheet in excel format including technical scores for all
proponents and price scoring for the above-mentioned proponents.
We recommend that DTAH, being the highest scoring proponent meeting all mandatory requirements and
specifications be awarded the Humber Bay Park Master Plan Project in the amount of $295,238.49.
Should you accept our recommendation, please forward a copy of the completed Purchase Order to
myself at Metro Hall
Thank you very much for your assistance. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

PFR

_________________________________
Netami Stuart, Project Coordinator Landscape Architect
PFR-PD&CP

PFR

Netami Stuart
Project Coordinator
Landscape Architect
Parks, Forestry and Recreation
Janie Romoff, General Manager

Parks Development/Capital Projects


Metro Hall, 24th Floor
55 John Street
Toronto, Ontario, M5V 3C6

Tel: 416-338-3327
Fax:416.392-3355
E-mail: nstuart@toronto.ca

DATE:

November 9, 2015

TO:

Joanne Kehoe, Manager Construction Services


Purchasing & Materials Management Division
Attn: Mike Voelker, Senior Corporate Buyer

FROM:

Netami Stuart, Project Coordinator Landscape Architect, PF&R PD&CP

RE:

Humber Bay Park Master Plan & Phase 1 Implementation RFP


Request for Proposals #9118-15-5046

The above noted Request for Proposals closed on September 30, 2015 and seven (7) proposals were
reviewed. The 5-member evaluation team completed its evaluation of the submissions against the criteria
set out in the Request for Proposals and the three firms of DTAH, The Planning Partnership and GH3
passed the technical evaluation.
Please open the following Proponents' second envelope, containing their submitted prices.
Rank
1.
2.
3.

Proponent
The Planning Partnership
DTAH
GH3

Technical Evaluation Points (Min 75% or 56.3)


65.90
62.15
57.00

I have attached the Proposal Evaluation Spreadsheet in excel format including technical scores for all
proponents, and non disclosure conflict of interest form for the evaluation team.
Thank you very much for your assistance. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

_________________________________
Netami Stuart, Project Coordinator Landscape Architect
PFR-PD&CP

PFR

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Leslie Coates
December-29-14 9:19 AM
Netami Stuart
Fwd: Re: Humber Bay Park East and West - Topo Survey - Status Update
Re: Humber Bay Park East and West - Topo Survey - Status Update.txt

Hi Netami,
I'm going to start to send you a few files on Humber Bay Parks as per attached.
Leslie

PFR

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Leslie Coates
December-29-14 9:26 AM
Netami Stuart
Fwd: Re: Humber Bay Park East and West - Topo Survey - Status Update
Re: Humber Bay Park East and West - Topo Survey - Status Update.txt

PFR

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Leslie Coates
December-29-14 9:28 AM
Netami Stuart
Fwd: Humber Bay Park East and West - Topo Survey - Status Update
Humber Bay Park East and West - Topo Survey - Status Update.txt

PFR

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Leslie Coates
January-05-15 11:39 AM
cpinto@trca.on.ca; NGaffney@trca.on.ca
Jane Weninger; Netami Stuart
Fwd: Application to name 2 geographic features (Etobicoke Point and Mimico
Harbour)
Application to name 2 geographic features (Etobicoke Point and Mimico Harbour).txt

Hello Nancy & Connie:


Have you seen the attached application to name 2 geographic features? Please let us know if TRCA has also been asked
to comment.
Netami Stuart will provide a response from PF&R so I've copied her on this request. I've also copied Jane Weninger
from City Planning as FYI.

All best,

Leslie
(416) 392-1885

PFR

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Connie Pinto <CPinto@trca.on.ca>


January-05-15 2:03 PM
Leslie Coates
Jane Weninger; Netami Stuart; Mike Fenning; NGaffney@trca.on.ca
Application to name 2 geographic features (Etobicoke Point and Mimico Harbour)
Part.002

Leslie,
Nancy received a hard copy of the package. TRCA has no objection to the proposed naming. It would be advisable to
contact the local boat clubs to ensure they are aware of the process and have the opportunity to complete the
questionnaire by the January 15 deadline.
Best regards,
Connie
Connie Pinto | Manager, Special Projects - Waterfront | Toronto and Region Conservation Authority | 70 Canuck Avenue, Toronto, ON | M3K 2C5 | 416.661.6600 ext.
5387 | 416.667.6278 | cpinto@trca.on.ca

The link ed image cannot be display ed. The file may hav e been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.

From:
"Leslie Coates" <lcoates@toronto.ca>
To:
<cpinto@trca.on.ca>, <NGaffney@trca.on.ca>,
Cc:
"Jane Weninger" <jwening@toronto.ca>, "Netami Stuart" <nstuart@toronto.ca>
Date:
01/05/2015 11:38 AM
Subject:
Fwd: Application to name 2 geographic features (Etobicoke Point and Mimico Harbour)

Hello Nancy & Connie:


Have you seen the attached application to name 2 geographic features? Please let us know if TRCA has also
been asked to comment.
Netami Stuart will provide a response from PF&R so I've copied her on this request. I've also copied Jane
Weninger from City Planning as FYI.

All best,

Leslie
(416) 392-1885
----- Message from "Marinel Cruz" <mcruz2@toronto.ca> on Mon, 05 Jan 2015 10:50:42 -0500 -----

To: "Leslie Coates" <lcoates@toronto.ca>


5

PFR

Subject: Application to name 2 geographic features (Etobicoke Point and Mimico Harbour)
Hi Leslie:
Richard reviewed the attached and suggested that you look into this. He said you may want to check with City
Suveryor's office. Please update the GM's office re. action taken.
Happy New Year!
Marinel
[attachment "Scan 001.pdf" deleted by Connie Pinto/MTRCA]
"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING, STORING OR FORWARDING THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named above, and may
be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,disclosure or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete it
permanently from your computer system.
Thank you."

PFR

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Tara Congram
January-05-15 3:19 PM
Leslie Coates; Netami Stuart
Lori Ellis
Re: Humber Bay East and West
PARK760 Humber Bay Shores-Parks Revitalization S42.pdf; T&P253 Humber Bay
Shores Park Construction - PF&R Transp.pdf; Humber Bay Shores & Humber Bay Pks
Projects in 2015 Cap Bud Jan 5 14.xlsx

Hi Leslie,
Thank you! Happy New Year!

Section 14(1)

Welcome back Netami :)

I have attached the Captor reports as well as the 2015 Capital Plan and 2016-2024 Capital Forecast for the Humber Bay
Shores and Humber Bay Parks. Please keep in mind this is not yet approved by Council (goes before Council in March
2015). Lori Ellis has been assigned on the capital side for the Humber Bay Shores projects.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Tara
>>> Leslie Coates 12/31/2014 10:10 AM >>>
Hello Tara:
Happy belated Christmas and Happy New Year!
Netami Stuart starts with the Special Projects section on Monday. One of her key projects will be the Humber Bay East
and West Revitalization Plan. Would you be able to send me the final C2 request that went in for funding for this
work. This is not for circulation it is just to bring Netami up to date on her workplan for 2015.
Many thanks.
Leslie

PFR

10

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Leslie Coates
January-05-15 3:58 PM
Tara Congram; Netami Stuart
Lori Ellis
Re: Humber Bay East and West

Tara,

Thanks for Humber Bay updates. Netami will be the lead on the Humber Bay Parks work. We will likely have more
questions but this info is a good start.
Leslie

Section 14(1)

>>> Tara Congram 01/05/2015 3:19 PM >>>


Hi Leslie,
Thank you! Happy New Year!
Welcome back Netami :)
I have attached the Captor reports as well as the 2015 Capital Plan and 2016-2024 Capital Forecast for the Humber Bay
Shores and Humber Bay Parks. Please keep in mind this is not yet approved by Council (goes before Council in March
2015). Lori Ellis has been assigned on the capital side for the Humber Bay Shores projects.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Tara
>>> Leslie Coates 12/31/2014 10:10 AM >>>
Hello Tara:
Happy belated Christmas and Happy New Year!
Netami Stuart starts with the Special Projects section on Monday. One of her key projects will be the Humber Bay East
and West Revitalization Plan. Would you be able to send me the final C2 request that went in for funding for this
work. This is not for circulation it is just to bring Netami up to date on her workplan for 2015.
Many thanks.
Leslie

PFR

11

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Leslie Coates
January-07-15 7:47 AM
Netami Stuart
Lori Ellis
Fwd: RE: Humber Bay West _ Boat Launches
Fwd: RE: Humber Bay West _ Boat Launches.txt

Hi Netami,
Electronic version of boat launch info.
Leslie

PFR

12

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Leslie Coates
January-07-15 7:49 AM
Netami Stuart
Fwd: Humber Bay Docks _ Preliminary Designs
Fwd: Humber Bay Docks _ Preliminary Designs.txt

Hello Netami,
I've attached more info including the preliminary design for the ponds at Humber Bay East - note that this shows a
rebuild of existing condition. I think we should evaluate a wider range of options.
Leslie

10

PFR

13

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Kerry Ferguson
January-08-15 9:36 AM
Bruce Mcpherson; Netami Stuart
Bill Moore
Re: Fwd: Application to name 2 geographic features (Etobicoke Point and Mimico
Harbour)

Netami:
Bruce asked me to respond to you.
We actually have no experience with this type of request, but we do manage the naming of streets across the City, and
so I will apply our logic and policy for street naming to this request.
We have a street, "Mimico Avenue", in the proximity of the harbour which we would consider to be a duplicate of the
proposed name "Mimico Harbour".
Duplication of names could potentially cause confusion for 1st responders, and therefore my recommendation
is to object to this name based on it being a duplicate of an existing street name in the area.
I see no problem with the name, "Etobicoke Point"

Thank you,
Kerry Ferguson, OLS
Senior Ontario Land Surveyor
Engineering & Construction Services
Engineering Support Services
City of Toronto,
18 Dyas Road, 4th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M3B 1V5
P: 416-392-7757,
F: 416-392-0081,
E: kferguso@toronto.ca
>>> Netami Stuart January 7, 2015 12:31 PM >>>
Hello Bruce,
I am emailing to ask your opinion about the MNR's questionnaire to name two geographic features. The
questionionnaires can be found at:
www.sse.gov.on.ca/sites/MNR-publicdocs/en/cmid/gnq-MimicoHarbour-eng-2014-11-20_distributed.pdf
http://www.sse.gov.on.ca/sites/MNR-publicdocs/en/cmid/gnq-EtobicokePoint-eng-2014-11-20_distributed.pdf
I have been tasked with PF&R's response to this application and I hope that you have some experience with this type of
thing that you can share with me.
The deadline for response to the questionnaire is January 15, so I'm hoping you can let me know before the end of the
week.
Thanks,
11

PFR

14

Netami Stuart OALA


Special Projects
Parks, Forestry & Recreation
55 John Street, 24th floor, M5V 3C6
416-338-3327

12

PFR

15

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Leslie Coates
January-09-15 8:56 AM
CWoodland@trca.on.ca
Netami Stuart
Humber Bay Park

Hello Carolyn:
Lovely to see you yesterday and to know what we can talk about Humber Bay Park. Do you have any meetings planned
in and around the downtown in the next two weeks? We can come meet you at a place that would be convenient.
Looking forward to seeing you.
Best, Leslie

13

PFR

16

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Enkhjargal Darisuren
January-09-15 11:51 AM
Netami Stuart
Re: Humber Bay Park East & West
humberbay east.xls; humberbay west.xls

Hi Netami,
I have Parks Title History file "Humber Bay Promenade Park - Easement
(2285 - 2289 Lake Shore Blvd, West)"
Also other files related to this title...please see the attached
Enke
>>> Netami Stuart 2015-01-09 11:30 AM >>>
Hi Enke,
Do you have a file with plans of Humber Bay Park East and Humber Bay Park West?
Thanks,
Netami

Netami Stuart OALA


Special Projects
Parks, Forestry & Recreation
55 John Street, 24th floor, M5V 3C6
416-338-3327

14

PFR

17

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Bradley Johnson <brad3214@gmail.com>


January-09-15 2:36 PM
Netami Stuart
Re: Humber Bay Parks East & West

Netami

IwouldbepleasedtotalkwithyouaboutHumberBayParks.IaminthePortHopearea,whichisalittleoveran
houraway,andwouldbegladtohaveyouvisit.OrImaybecomingtoTorontowithinthenextweekortwoandcould
stopbyyouroffice.Ifyouhavepreferencespleaseletmeknow.

I'mpleasedtohearofanupdateproject.Timeshaveindeedchangedsincethe70'sandtherearemanypotentials.

BradJohnson
OALAFCSLARCA
BradJohnson+AssociatesLimited
9057972725

On20150109,at12:03PM,NetamiStuartwrote:

>DearBradJohnson,
>
>IamalandscapearchitectinParks,Forestry&RecreationattheCityofToronto.ThisyearIwillbecoordinatinga
projecttocreateanewmasterplanforHumberBayParksandIamhopingthatIcantalktoyouabouttheoriginal
masterplananddesign.Ithinkourprocesswouldbewellinformedtounderstandhowtheoriginalplanwasdeveloped,
howtheprocessunfoldedandwhatthemaindesignintentwas.Wedonotwanttolosesightoftheoriginalintentin
thisprojecttorevitalizetheparkandaccommodatewithinitthechanginglocaldemographics.
>
>PleasecalloremailanytimeyouareavailbletodiscussHumberBayParks.Ilookforwardtohearingfromyou.
>
>BestRegards,
>
>
>NetamiStuartOALA
>SpecialProjects
>Parks,Forestry&Recreation
>55JohnStreet,24thfloor,M5V3C6
>4163383327

15

PFR

18

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Lori Ellis
January-09-15 4:37 PM
Netami Stuart
Leslie Coates
Humber Bay Park Revitalization - Information

Netami,
Most project information transferred to the the following location:
M:\Districts\CityWide\PDIM\SPECIAL PROJECTS\SP-PROJECTS\Humber Bay Park - Revitalization
I will transfer the remaining next week -aerial and mapping.
Lori

Lori Ellis
CityofToronto
Parks,Forestry+Recreation
LandscapeArchitect,OALA,CSLA
SeniorProjectCoordinator,PDCP
t416.394.2483

16

PFR

19

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Connie Pinto <CPinto@trca.on.ca>


January-12-15 10:25 AM
Netami Stuart
Re: Humber Bay Park - Background
Part.002

Netami,
I was about to call you on the same subject! I'm here all day but I won't be part of the Scarborough meeting.
My office is three doors down from the Waterfront meeting room so come by anytime before or after your meeting and we
can chat.
See you then,
Connie
Connie Pinto | Manager, Special Projects - Waterfront | Toronto and Region Conservation Authority | 70 Canuck Avenue, Toronto, ON | M3K 2C5 | 416.661.6600 ext.
5387 | 416.667.6278 | cpinto@trca.on.ca

The link ed image cannot be display ed. The file may hav e been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.

"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING, STORING OR FORWARDING THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named above, and may
be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,disclosure or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete it
permanently from your computer system.
Thank you."

17

PFR

20

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Jorge Ture
January-12-15 12:45 PM
Netami Stuart
Leslie Coates
Re: contacts at Humber Bay/Etobicoke Yacht clubs
fskwnbfotolc.image_161.bmp

Hi Netami
Welcome Back and Happy New Year to you also.
I don't see any contact information in Dave's old files. Suggest Google or Lease and Agreements section.

Jorge Ture
Park Supervisor
South Etobicoke - Wards 5 & 6

Parks Website www.toronto.ca/parks


Get Personal Assistance 24/7 - Call 311 or visit www.toronto.ca/311
s. 14(1)
>>> Netami Stuart 01/06/2015 4:11 PM >>>
Hi Jorge,
Happy New Year!
working here with Leslie Coates on Humber Bay Park E&W
(among other things). I'm sure we'll be in touch about that very soon.
However, I'm emailing you for another reason to see if you have contact names for the yacht club and sailing school in
Humber Bay East. The MNR is circulating a questionnaire regarding the naming of part of the park "Etobicoke Point"
and the area where the boats are moored "Mimico Harbour". I want to make sure the yacht clubs have a chance to
comment.

Please forward any names & emails you have.


Thanks,
Netami

Netami Stuart OALA


Special Projects
Parks, Forestry & Recreation
55 John Street, 24th floor, M5V 3C6
416-338-3327

18

PFR

21

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Brad Johnson <brad3214@gmail.com>


January-12-15 1:17 PM
Netami Stuart
Re: Humber Bay Parks East & West
s. 14(1)

Netami
I hope you rec'd My ,earlier reponse. I am available , with some exceptions , until jan 29
Brad johnson
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 9, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Netami Stuart <nstuart@toronto.ca> wrote:
Dear Brad Johnson,
I am a landscape architect in Parks, Forestry & Recreation at the City of Toronto. This year I
will be coordinating a project to create a new master plan for Humber Bay Parks and I am
hoping that I can talk to you about the original master plan and design. I think our process would
be well informed to understand how the original plan was developed, how the process unfolded
and what the main design intent was. We do not want to lose sight of the original intent in this
project to revitalize the park and accommodate within it the changing local demographics.
Please call or email anytime you are availble to discuss Humber Bay Parks. I look forward to
hearing from you.
Best Regards,
Netami Stuart OALA
Special Projects
Parks, Forestry & Recreation
55 John Street, 24th floor, M5V 3C6
416-338-3327

19

PFR

22

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Kristi Evans
January-15-15 1:35 PM
Netami Stuart
Staff Report

Hi Netami,
Attached is a link to the Staff Report online =)
http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-64533.pdf
Let me know if you can access it.
Thanks,
Kris Evans

20

PFR

23

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Leslie Coates
January-16-15 2:54 PM
Netami Stuart
Fwd: Re: Humber Bay Park design history
Re: Humber Bay Park design history.txt

s. 14(1)

We're on for next Friday at 4 pm.


Leslie

21

PFR

24

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Leslie Coates
January-21-15 9:26 AM
Netami Stuart
Fwd: Shorelines - Winter 2015
Shorelines - Winter 2015.txt

See piece on Grebes at Humber Bay Park.


lc

22

PFR

25

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

mhcopy
January-23-15 1:44 PM
Netami Stuart
LARGE MAPS
scan088.pdf; scan089.pdf; scan090.pdf; scan091.pdf; scan092.pdf; scan093.pdf;
scan094.pdf; scan095.pdf; scan096.pdf; scan097.pdf; scan098.pdf; scan100.pdf;
scan101.pdf; scan102.pdf; scan105.pdf

Importance:

High

Hi Netami,
Attached on this email are the PDF format of your maps.
Thanks and have a great day.
MH COPY

23

PFR

26

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Bob Duguid
January-27-15 1:45 PM
Netami Stuart
Re: RFP for an MP
13-5071 - QP North revFINAL Oct 16 13.docx; 13-5074 Add Nr01 revFINAL.docx;
13-5071 Add Nr02 rev02 BDv2.docx; 13-5071 Add Nr03 rev03.docx

attached, with addenda.


have fun,
bob
>>> Netami Stuart 01/27/2015 11:01 AM >>>
Hi Bob,
I'm trying to write an RFP for the master plan of Humber Bay East and West. Would it be possible to get a word copy of
the one you made for QP? Beatrice sent me a .pdf but I can't copy and paste!
It is a lovely document. Simple, to-the-point, clear and no-nonsense.
Thanks,
N

24

PFR

27

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Bradley Johnson <brad3214@gmail.com>


January-29-15 1:50 PM
Netami Stuart
Re: Humber Bay Parks East & West
s. 14(1)

HiNetami

IhadhopedtogetintoTorontotoseeyouduringthelast2weeksbutcouldn'tmanageit.

(withaccesstoemail)andIfyouwouldstillliketomeetIwillbeabletodosoinMarch.

BradJohnson

On20150113,at9:48AM,NetamiStuartwrote:

>HiBrad,
>Thanksforyouremail,Iappreciateyougettingbacktome.IwishIcouldgoouttoPortHopeonbehalfoftheCityof
Toronto,howeverintheinterestsofefficiencyIthinkwemayhavetotalkonthephone.Orwhenyouareinthecitywe
couldsitdownforanhouratalocationconvenientforyou.
>
>IwillbereceivingacopyoftheoriginalplansfromtheTRCAinthenextcoupleofweeksandIwouldliketohavea
lookatthemandrefertothemwhenwetalk.
>
>PleaseletmeknowwhenIcancallyouor,alternativelywhereandwhenwecanmeetonyournexttriptoToronto.
>
>Thanks,
>Netami
>
>
>NetamiStuartOALA
>SpecialProjects
s. 14(1)
>Parks,Forestry&Recreation
>55JohnStreet,24thfloor,M5V3C6
>4163383327
>>>>BradJohnson<brad3214@gmail.com>01/12/20151:16PM>>>
>Netami
>
>Ihopeyourec'dMy,earlierreponse.Iamavailable,withsomeexceptions,untiljan29

>
>Bradjohnson
>
>SentfrommyiPad
>
>OnJan9,2015,at12:03PM,NetamiStuart<nstuart@toronto.ca>wrote:
>
>>DearBradJohnson,
>>
25

PFR

28

>>IamalandscapearchitectinParks,Forestry&RecreationattheCityofToronto.ThisyearIwillbecoordinatinga
projecttocreateanewmasterplanforHumberBayParksandIamhopingthatIcantalktoyouabouttheoriginal
masterplananddesign.Ithinkourprocesswouldbewellinformedtounderstandhowtheoriginalplanwasdeveloped,
howtheprocessunfoldedandwhatthemaindesignintentwas.Wedonotwanttolosesightoftheoriginalintentin
thisprojecttorevitalizetheparkandaccommodatewithinitthechanginglocaldemographics.
>>
>>PleasecalloremailanytimeyouareavailbletodiscussHumberBayParks.Ilookforwardtohearingfromyou.
>>
>>BestRegards,
>>
>>
>>NetamiStuartOALA
>>SpecialProjects
>>Parks,Forestry&Recreation
>>55JohnStreet,24thfloor,M5V3C6
>>4163383327

26

PFR

29

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Jennifer Hyland
January-29-15 3:26 PM
Lori Ellis; Netami Stuart
Re: bike & ped traffic @ Humber Bay
Martin Goodman Trail West.xls

I have cyclist counts but no pedestrian counts for the Western MGT (at the Humber bridge) from 2013.
Hope these help.
Jen
>>> Lori Ellis 01/29/2015 2:59 PM >>>
Netami,
I should have this in my files. There are bike counts that have been done - around 2013? Embarrassing that I cannot
find them in my files - Sadly but graciously I defer to Jen for this information.
Lori
>>> Netami Stuart 01/29/2015 2:02 PM >>>
HI there,
I'm wondering if there are any recent counts for bike & ped traffic at Humber Bay Parks west of Humber Bay
Shores. Even if you have info for Humber Bay Shores that would be useful.
Thanks,
Netami

Netami Stuart OALA


Special Projects
Parks, Forestry & Recreation
55 John Street, 24th floor, M5V 3C6
416-338-3327

27

PFR

30

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Marc Kramer
February-02-15 10:57 AM
Netami Stuart
Fwd: Humber Bay Parks
Humber Bay Parks.txt

28

PFR

31

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Lori Ellis
February-04-15 11:30 AM
Netami Stuart
Humber Bay Park East and West - UF Contact

Urban Forestry contact - Janice Allen


Lori

29

PFR

32

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Janette Harvey
February-11-15 2:21 PM
Scott Laver; Netami Stuart
Leslie Coates; Lori Ellis
Re: Humber Bay Park

Hi Netami,
We can contribute to restoration & trails work, and we can participate during the master planning process. I've got lots
of contacts in the area, which may be of some use to you during the public consultation phase.
We have a budget for plant material, and potentially a budget for some trail work (depending on the scope of what is
proposed - we would have to discuss this in greater detail at some point). We also have a substantial base of volunteers
in the area and as you know we are always looking for areas to engage these volunteers, so if there is an opportunity to
involve them in any restoration components (where appropriate), we would love to help with that.
Janette

>>> Netami Stuart 10/02/2015 4:15 PM >>>


Good Morning!
We are almost done the RFP for the Humber Bay Park Master Plan. We will be hiring a landscape architect, coastal
engineer and restoration ecologist to do a master plan and phase one construction. Following completion of the master
plan, we have $300K in 2016 for detailed design & construction for Phase 1, which will be natural environment/terrestrial
habitat restoration & enhancement and natural environment trail improvements. Further phases will deal with biggerticket items such as the ponds & buildings.
I'm interested in whether your section has the budget to contribute to the natural environment restoration & trails
work. If you do we will talk about your priorities and how you'd like to be involved in the project. (Even if you don't
have any $$ to chip in I hope you can be involved.)
Attached for your reference is a copy of the RFP draft.
best,
Netami

Netami Stuart OALA


Special Projects
Parks, Forestry & Recreation
55 John Street, 24th floor, M5V 3C6
416-338-3327

30

PFR

33

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Lori Ellis
February-23-15 7:28 PM
Garth Armour; Scott Laver; Emilia Floro; Carly Bowman; Richard Beck; Carson Wiseman;
Rick Helary; Bruce Clayton; Steve Garvin; Netami Stuart; Ngaffney@trca.on.ca;
Jim.Sinikas@ttc.ca; Mary-Ann.George@ttc.ca
Stephen O'Bright; Jennifer Hyland; RJordan@elac.ca
Humber Bay Shores Park - Trail Improvements - PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REVIEW
HBShores Plans -TAC Mtg-Feb24th 2015.pdf

Humber Bay Shores TAC: November 24th 2015


Plan materials for the Humber Bay Shores Park TAC meeting tomorrow attached here:
- Existing Trail Alignment
- Preferred Trail Alignment
11 x 17 colour prints of these plans will be provided at the meeting.
IMPORTANT: These documents are for Internal Review/Discussion only.
Plan refinements pending further discussion and cost estimate.
Please do not circulate.
Thank-you,
Lori

Lori Ellis
CityofToronto
Parks,Forestry+Recreation
LandscapeArchitect,OALA,CSLA
SeniorProjectCoordinator,PDCP
t416.394.2483

31

PFR

34

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Connie Pinto <CPinto@trca.on.ca>


February-25-15 9:28 AM
Carly Bowman
Netami Stuart
Jean Augustine Park - pond
Part.002

Carly,
Further to our brief conversation yesterday about the above site, Councillor Grimes has requested that TRCA provide a
plan to address concerns related to vegetation growth in and around the pond, viewing opportunities and obstructions,
and general maintenance of the pond. I have asked our restoration services staff to recommend possible modifications to
the pond to address these concerns. I will work with our staff and Netami to develop a plan which we will share with the
councillor.
If you have any concerns or suggestions, please don't hesitate to contact Netami or myself.
Best regards,
Connie
Connie Pinto | Manager, Special Projects - Waterfront | Toronto and Region Conservation Authority | 5 Shoreham Drive, Toronto, ON | M3N 1S4 | 416.661.6600 ext.
5387 | 416.667.6278 | cpinto@trca.on.ca

The link ed image cannot be display ed. The file may hav e been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.

"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING, STORING OR FORWARDING THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named above, and may
be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,disclosure or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete it
permanently from your computer system.
Thank you."

32

PFR

35

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Carly Bowman
February-25-15 11:50 AM
Connie Pinto
Netami Stuart
Re: Jean Augustine Park - pond
IMAGE.jpeg

Connie, thanks very much for this. Please let us know what sort of solution is eventually devised.
Nice to meet you and Netami in person yesterday.
Best,
Carly

CarlyBowman,MScPl,MCIP,RPP
SeniorPlanner,CommunityPlanning
EtobicokeYorkDistrict
2 Civic Centre Court, 3rd Floor
Toronto, ON M9C 5A3
t:4163948228
e:cbowman2@toronto.ca

>>> Connie Pinto <CPinto@trca.on.ca> 02/25/2015 9:27 AM >>>


Carly,
Further to our brief conversation yesterday about the above site, Councillor Grimes has requested that TRCA provide a
plan to address concerns related to vegetation growth in and around the pond, viewing opportunities and obstructions,
and general maintenance of the pond. I have asked our restoration services staff to recommend possible modifications
to the pond to address these concerns. I will work with our staff and Netami to develop a plan which we will share with
the councillor.
If you have any concerns or suggestions, please don't hesitate to contact Netami or myself.
Best regards,
Connie
Connie Pinto | Manager, Special Projects - Waterfront | Toronto and Region Conservation Authority | 5 Shoreham Drive, Toronto, ON | M3N 1S4 |
416.661.6600 ext. 5387 | 416.667.6278 | cpinto@trca.on.ca

The link ed image cannot be display ed. The file may hav e been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.

"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING, STORING OR FORWARDING THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named above, and
may be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,disclosure or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete
it permanently from your computer system.
Thank you."

33

PFR

36

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Connie Pinto <CPinto@trca.on.ca>


February-27-15 4:40 PM
Netami Stuart
Re: Jean Augustine Park - pond
Part.002

Netami,
I had a conversation with our restoration staff this morning on this subject. I would like to take you up on your offer to
prepare a concept plan for the councillor, which he can share with the HBCA. Then I can work with our staff to prepare
detailed designs, costing and scheduling. I would like to talk to you further regarding what it might look like. I really want
to maintain the function of the pond, while improving the look of it for the local residents.
Connie
Connie Pinto | Manager, Special Projects - Waterfront | Toronto and Region Conservation Authority | 5 Shoreham Drive, Toronto, ON | M3N 1S4 | 416.661.6600 ext.
5387 | 416.667.6278 | cpinto@trca.on.ca

The link ed image cannot be display ed. The file may hav e been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.

"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING, STORING OR FORWARDING THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named above, and may
be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,disclosure or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete it
permanently from your computer system.
Thank you."

34

PFR

37

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Councillor Grimes
March-02-15 12:39 PM
Netami Stuart
Re: West Humber Off Leash
IMAGE.BMP

s. 14(1)

Hi
Thank you for writing to Councillor Grimes with your thoughts. The City is undertaking a master plan later this year for
Humber Bay Parks East and West to take into account everything that's currently in the parks, what needs to be
improved, and what needs to be changed. The master plan is an entire re-thinking of the current parks. This off-leash
area can be considered for this as this park has funding for change.
I have copied Netami Stuart, the project lead, on this email. Netami, please see
them in the notes for the Humber Bay Parks East and West Master Plan.

comments below and include

Thanks very much.

Best regards,
Victoria Stefaniak
Administrative Assistant

Councillor Mark Grimes' Office


Ward 6, Etobicoke Lakeshore
City Hall
100 Queen Street West, Suite C48
Toronto, ON M5H 2N2
Tel: 416-397-9273 Fax: 416-397-9279
www.markgrimes.ca
Stay Connected:
eNewsletter http://eepurl.com/bbBSbL
Twitter http://twitter.com/Mark_Grimes
Facebook http://facebook.com/councillor.grimes

"Revitalizing Our Community"


The link ed image cannot
be d isplay ed. The file may
hav e been mov ed,
ren amed, or deleted.
Verify that the link poin ts
to the correct file and
location.

IF YOU HAVE SCHEDULED A MEETING WITH ANYONE IN COUNCILLOR GRIMES OFFICE, PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT YOU MAY BE
REQUIRED TO REGISTER AS A LOBBYIST. CITY COUNCIL REGULATIONS ARE BROAD IN THE DEFINITION OF LOBBYING, SO
35

PFR

38

REGARDLESS OF THE NATURE OF YOUR REQUESTED MEETING YOU ARE ADVISED TO CHECK FOR MORE INFORMATION AT:
http://www.toronto.ca/lobbying/index.htm
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission,
dissemination, copying, forwarding, distribution or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all
attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same.

>>>
Hi;

02/03/2015 12:28 PM >>>


s. 14(1)

As a frequent user of the West Humber Off Leash park, I have a concern.
Most off leash parks have a double gate system at the entrance. This gives dog owners a small space to leash or unleash
their dog before entering or exiting the park. It also prevents other dogs in the park (that often run to the gate to greet
new dogs) from getting out.
Having a double gate would really help us in this park. Is this something that can be done?
I've attached a picture of an example double gate.
Also, there is one section of the off leash that is not fully secure and dogs can jump on a rock and escape from the area.
As someone with a dog that is a flight risk, it's a problem. A small addition to the existing fence would solve the
problem.
I would love to show someone this issue to see if we can fix it.
This is an amazing off leash park that is loved by many local dog owners. We welcome the opportunity to work with the
city to keep it safe for dogs and owners alike.
Thanks,
s. 14(1)

36

PFR

39

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Nancy Gaffney <NGaffney@trca.on.ca>


March-06-15 3:25 PM
Netami Stuart
Re: Jean Augustin Pond & Fountain

Hi Netami
I just wanted to let you know that Connie does not work for the TRCA anymore. I am aware of this work and I will follow
up with staff to make sure Kim gets what she needs as soon as possible. If you are working with Connie on any other
projects that you need action or information for please contact me directly and I will follow up with you quickly. You can
call me at 416 258 1409.
Have a good weekend.
Nancy
Nancy Gaffney BSc | Waterfront Specialist | Watershed Management Division | Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority |5 Shoreham Dr., Toronto, ON | M3N 1S4 | 416.661.6600, ext. 5313 | 416.667.6278 | * ngaffney@trca.on.ca

From:
"Kim Edgar" <kedgar@toronto.ca>
To:
"Netami Stuart" <nstuart@toronto.ca>, "Connie Pinto" <CPinto@trca.on.ca>,
Date:
03/06/2015 03:05 PM
Subject:
Jean Augustin Pond & Fountain

Hi Ladies,
Connie, thanks for your call earlier this week. Please let me know as soon as possible when you have a
potential solution for the pond and fountain - Councillor Grimes and the community are eager to meet about it
but I am fending them off until I hear from you!
Thanks & have a good weekend,
Kim

KimEdgar
ExecutiveAssistant
toCouncillorMarkGrimes
Ward6,EtobicokeLakeshore

TorontoCityHall
100QueenStreetWest,SuiteC48
Toronto,ONM5H2N2
Tel:4163385167
37

PFR

40

Fax:4163979279
kedgar@toronto.ca
www.markgrimes.ca
StayConnected:
eNewsletterhttp://eepurl.com/Btg_5
Twitterhttp://twitter.com/Mark_Grimes
Facebookhttp://facebook.com/councillor.grimes
"RevitalizingOurCommunity"
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination,
copying, forwarding, distribution or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in
error, please contact the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing
same.

"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING, STORING OR FORWARDING THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named above, and may
be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,disclosure or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete it
permanently from your computer system.
Thank you."

38

PFR

41

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Carolyn Woodland <CWoodland@trca.on.ca>


March-08-15 10:46 PM
Netami Stuart
My Humber Bay Shores report

Hi Netami,
I was wondering if you could get the report that I lent to you back to me for Humber Bay Shores Masterplan. It was my
only personal copy for my own work. I understand that Nancy Gaffney has also sent this material to your department for
your own use.
Thanks for the urgent attention to this matter.
Sorry to hear about Leslie - it is a great loss of corporate knowledge.
Carolyn

Carolyn Woodland, OALA, FCSLA, MCIP, RPP


Senior Director, Planning, Greenspace and Communications
Toronto and Region Conservation
tel: (416) 661-6600 ext. 5214
fax: (416) 661-6898
email: cwoodland@trca.on.ca
URL: http://www.trca.on.ca
"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING, STORING OR FORWARDING THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named above, and may
be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,disclosure or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete it
permanently from your computer system.
Thank you."

39

PFR

42

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Lori Ellis
March-19-15 11:30 AM
Stephen O'Bright; Nicola (Nick) Garisto; Netami Stuart
Humber Bay Shores - Development Plan and Sect 37
HBay Shores - Section 37 - March 2015.pdf; Humber Bay Shores - Development
Activity-2015.pdf

For our Humber Bay Shores - Meeting tomorrow.


Thanks,
Lori

Lori Ellis
CityofToronto
Parks,Forestry+Recreation
LandscapeArchitect,OALA,CSLA
SeniorProjectCoordinator,PDCP
t416.394.2483

40

PFR

43

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Michael Schreiner
March-20-15 9:51 AM
Stephen O'Bright; Nicola (Nick) Garisto; Lori Ellis; Netami Stuart
CIL amounts received by years
CIL Received 2004 - 2014.pdf

This is spent District wide


$450 a year goes directly to the 3 playgrounds ($150/site) program in each district
Mike

41

PFR

44

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Jorge Ture
March-27-15 8:47 AM
Netami Stuart
Donna Kovachis; Helen Sousa; Stephen O'Bright; NGaffney@trca.on.ca
Re: Jean Augustine Pond
IMAGE.BMP

Good Morning Netami


I'm not aware of any plans for this pond. Below is the response I provided the councillor and condo association last fall.
Since then they've been asking around hoping to get an response that they like.
Lastly with regard to the natural pond in Jean Augustine Park this pond has been an issue of debate for will over
a decade. I was the park supervisor when this park (then called New Port Beach Park) was built and at that time I
strongly recommending that the water feature be an ornamental fountain as opposed to a natural pond which I
recall was supported by the local community and the then newly formed Humber Bay Condo Association. This
natural pond is behaving exactly as it should, the cattails help keep the pond healthy by filtering runoff and
providing nesting habitat for many species of wildlife and birds. I'm not entirely sure if the cattails were part of
the original design, regardless they spread rapidly because their seeds blow in the wind and float on the water's
surface so if they weren't part of the original design it was a matter of time before seeds would blow in from
nearby Humber Marshes. Cattails spread from underground rhizomes and therefore costly mechanical removal
would only be a temporary solution and the use of toxic herbicides is not an option that the city would support
nor do I believe it would be supported by the local community.
At this point I see three clear options as follows. Last two items would of course require the support of the local
councillor and community.
1. Enjoy the pond as it is and appreciate the natural beauty it provides, which I know would be supported by
many park users who prefer a more natural look as opposed to a "groomed" environment.
2. Remove the water feature entirely.
3. Work toward's the design and installation of a ornamental fountain.
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.

Jorge Ture

Park Supervisor
South Etobicoke - Wards 5 & 6

Parks Website www.toronto.ca/parks


Get Personal Assistance 24/7 - Call 311 or visit www.toronto.ca/311
The link ed image cannot be display ed. The file may hav e been mov ed, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.

>>> Netami Stuart 03/26/2015 3:52 PM >>>


Hi everyone,
In a recent site visit to Humber Bay, Councillor Grimes asked Connie Pinto and I about whether anything could be done
about the cattails in Jean Augustine Park pond. Connie (who is no longer with the TRCA, so I'm emailing Nancy)
suggested that the TRCA might be able to come in and remove some but not all of the vegetation and use it for planting
42

PFR

45

elsewhere. This would solve the problem in the short term. A long term solution would involve building decking around
the pond to prevent cattail growth in the future. As far as I know this is not in anyone's budget or work plan.
I am emailing you all because I told Kim Edgar in the councillor's office that I would find out if anyone had any plans to
do anything about these cattails.
If you or your staff have plans to address the councillor's desire to have the cattails removed, please let me know.
If you would like to develop plans to remove the cattails, please let me know and I'll tell Kim you're working on it.
Otherwise, I will let her know that she should get in touch with you in writing in order to have the issue addressed.
all the best,
Netami

Netami Stuart OALA


Special Projects
Parks, Forestry & Recreation
55 John Street, 24th floor, M5V 3C6
416-338-3327

43

PFR

46

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Lori Ellis
March-27-15 5:33 PM
Garth Armour; Jorge Ture; Donna Kovachis; Helen Sousa; Scott Laver; Stephen
O'Bright; Julia Murnaghan; Sabrina Buson; Emilia Floro; Sabrina Salatino; Bill Kiru; Carly
Bowman; Kathryn Thom; Lara Tarlo; Richard Beck; Carson Wiseman; Jean-Paul Pontet;
Rick Helary; Bruce Clayton; Steve Garvin; Netami Stuart; Tom Mefailoski; Connie Pinto;
Nancy Gaffney; Jim.Sinikas@ttc.ca; Mary-Ann.George@ttc.ca; Mitch Stambler;
Rob.Gillard@ttc.ca
Jennifer Hyland; Erik#032#Lees#032#; Reinaldo#032#Jordan#032#
Humber Bay Shores Park - Public Event - APRIL 9th 2015
2015 03 19 Humber - Public Event Flyer FINAL1.pdf

Upcoming Humber Bay Shores Park - Trail Improvements


PUBLIC EVENT - April 9th 2015
Flyer and details attached.
Please let me know if you will be attending so that we can prepare name tags accordingly.
Thank-you,
Lori

Lori Ellis
CityofToronto
Parks,Forestry+Recreation
LandscapeArchitect,OALA,CSLA
SeniorProjectCoordinator,PDCP
t416.394.2483

44

PFR

47

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
May-05-15 9:57 AM
Lori Ellis
Humber Bay E&W
hbe&w_RFP_topurchasing_5May2015.docx

Hereyougo.Doyourbesttogetthislookedatsooooon.Iwanttodosomethinguseful!
Thanks!
n

45

PFR

48

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Lori Ellis
May-19-15 5:21 PM
Netami Stuart
Humber Bay Park EW - RFP final few edits - please review - then will send
HBayPark-EW RFP-toPMMD-May19-2015.docx

Netami,

Takealookminoreditsinclude:
typosandtext
someadditionaldeliverableswithrespecttocommentsheets/andhandoutsforengagementand
webpagedeliverables(AODAcompliantformat)
oneextrameetinginConceptDesign/MPlan(6total)
DetailedDesign(3total)
SummaryofOperatingImpactstoCapitalinManagementPlanphase

NeedAppendixF1andF2AerialContextandSiteMeetinglocationmap.

IfaokwithyouwillsendtopurchasingtomorrowMay20!

Lori

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:May05159:57AM
To:LoriEllis
Subject:HumberBayE&W

Hereyougo.Doyourbesttogetthislookedatsooooon.Iwanttodosomethinguseful!
Thanks!
n

46

PFR

49

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Lori Ellis
May-28-15 12:01 PM
Mike Voelker
Netami Stuart
Humber Bay Shores Park - Park Masterplan
Humber Bay Parks-Project Area.pdf; Park Map-46G.pdf; HBayPark-EW RFP-toPMMDMay28-2015.docx

Mike,
Attached here is a Draft RFP for Park Masterplan work at Humber Bay Shores Park in Ward 6.
Maps also attached for your reference. NOTE: Appendices are not included in this submission and will follow with the
next revision.
Please confirm receipt of this e-mail and the attached documents and provide a time-line for review of Draft 1
Thank-you kindly,
Lori

LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483

47

PFR

50

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
May-29-15 7:13 AM
Lori Ellis
Netami Stuart
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Shores Park - Park Masterplan

Good Morning, Lori:


your call number will be 9118-15-5046
tks! . . . hmv

From:LoriEllis
Sent:May28,201512:01
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046HumberBayShoresParkParkMasterplan

Mike,
Attached here is a Draft RFP for Park Masterplan work at Humber Bay Shores Park in Ward 6.
Maps also attached for your reference. NOTE: Appendices are not included in this submission and will follow
with the next revision.
Please confirm receipt of this e-mail and the attached documents and provide a time-line for review of
Draft 1
Thank-you kindly,
Lori

LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483

48

PFR

51

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Lori Ellis
June-08-15 9:01 AM
Mike Voelker
Netami Stuart; Alex Mut
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay shores and new RFP template

Mike,

GoodMorningtoyouaswell.
SorryIdidnotcompletelyrespondtoyouremailbelow.Hereisthemorecompleteresponse!

AlexandIworkedonthecallforHumberBayShoresTrailImprovementstogether.Theyarecompletelydifferent
projectswithverysimilarnamesandarerightbesideeachother(toaddtotheconfusion).
ThisprojectiscalledHumberBayParkEastandWest.Theother(theoneAlexsubmittedlastyear)iscalledHumber
BayShoresParkTrailImprovements.

Iwillensurethatthereisnooverlapinthescope.
Thanksforcatchingthis.Goodtoknowyouarepayingattention

YesWillreworkwithCurrenttemplatedownloadedfromwebpage.
SecondisNetamiStuartLandscapeArchitectinSpecialProjectsofPDCP.

Thanksagain,
Lori

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June08158:48AM
To:LoriEllis;AlexMut
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Hello, Lori:
Before you start on re-working this call, could you please check with Alex? he had issued a call for Humber Bay Shores
last year for park and trail improvements. Please assure that there is no overlap of services.
tks! . . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June7,201511:02
To:LoriEllis
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtempalte
Good Morning, Lori:
Had a look at your Humber Bay Shores package, and it would appear that you used a template that is two years
out of date. Please see our webpage to get our latest RFP template and use it to prepp the doc. The revised
template contains a lot of information and direction that you will find useful in the preparation of the call, so it is
well worth always downloading a clean copy from the webpage.
And by the way . . . Who is your second on this?
rgds . . . hmv

49

PFR

52

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Lori Ellis
June-22-15 1:02 PM
Mike Voelker
Netami Stuart
FW: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park - East and West - UPDATED RFP template and
attachments
HBayPark-EW RFP-Rev2_newtemplate.docx; AppendixF1_aerialcontext.JPG; AppendixF2
_sitemeeting.jpg; AppendixF3_Contractor_asset_inventory_form.pdf; AppendixF4
_Contractor_Performance_Evaluation.jpg; Contractor Performance Evaluation
Template.pdf

Mike,
As requested Please see attached RFP for 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park - East and West.
Please confirm when received and provide me with a time-line for follow-up Thanks.
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483

From:LoriEllis
Sent:June08159:01AM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:NetamiStuart;AlexMut
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Mike,

GoodMorningtoyouaswell.
SorryIdidnotcompletelyrespondtoyouremailbelow.Hereisthemorecompleteresponse!

AlexandIworkedonthecallforHumberBayShoresTrailImprovementstogether.Theyarecompletelydifferent
projectswithverysimilarnamesandarerightbesideeachother(toaddtotheconfusion).
ThisprojectiscalledHumberBayParkEastandWest.Theother(theoneAlexsubmittedlastyear)iscalledHumber
BayShoresParkTrailImprovements.

Iwillensurethatthereisnooverlapinthescope.
Thanksforcatchingthis.Goodtoknowyouarepayingattention

YesWillreworkwithCurrenttemplatedownloadedfromwebpage.
SecondisNetamiStuartLandscapeArchitectinSpecialProjectsofPDCP.

50

PFR

53

Thanksagain,
Lori

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June08158:48AM
To:LoriEllis;AlexMut
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Hello, Lori:
Before you start on re-working this call, could you please check with Alex? he had issued a call for Humber Bay Shores
last year for park and trail improvements. Please assure that there is no overlap of services.
tks! . . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June7,201511:02
To:LoriEllis
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtempalte
Good Morning, Lori:
Had a look at your Humber Bay Shores package, and it would appear that you used a template that is two years
out of date. Please see our webpage to get our latest RFP template and use it to prepp the doc. The revised
template contains a lot of information and direction that you will find useful in the preparation of the call, so it is
well worth always downloading a clean copy from the webpage.
And by the way . . . Who is your second on this?
rgds . . . hmv

51

PFR

54

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
July-05-15 10:28 AM
Lori Ellis
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park - East and West - UPDATED RFP template and
attachments

Hello,Lori'
Hadalookatyourdocandfindthatitisn'tthelatesttemplate:
1/themanagerislistedasDavidFerguson,who'snotbeenwiththeCityforoverayear.
2/thecallnumberdatesto2013
3/thePanAminformationwasmissing
4/Insection1,definitionsweremissing(well,oneanywayandthat'sasfarasIgot)
IcouldoverlookacoupleofthingsbutpleaseunderstandI'veunfortunatelynotthetimerightnowtogothroughthe
docsclausebyclausetoassurethateverythingthat'sbeenaddedinthepasttwoyearsisinyourdraft.
Pleasealwaysgotoourwebpageanddownloadthelatesttemplate.CurrentlythelatestRFPwasreleased4.June.
tks!...hmv

From:LoriEllis
Sent:June22,20151:02PM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParkEastandWestUPDATEDRFPtemplateandattachments

Mike,
As requested Please see attached RFP for 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park - East and West.
Please confirm when received and provide me with a time-line for follow-up Thanks.
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483

From:LoriEllis
Sent:June08159:01AM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:NetamiStuart;AlexMut
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Mike,

52

PFR

55

GoodMorningtoyouaswell.
SorryIdidnotcompletelyrespondtoyouremailbelow.Hereisthemorecompleteresponse!

AlexandIworkedonthecallforHumberBayShoresTrailImprovementstogether.Theyarecompletelydifferent
projectswithverysimilarnamesandarerightbesideeachother(toaddtotheconfusion).
ThisprojectiscalledHumberBayParkEastandWest.Theother(theoneAlexsubmittedlastyear)iscalledHumber
BayShoresParkTrailImprovements.

Iwillensurethatthereisnooverlapinthescope.
Thanksforcatchingthis.Goodtoknowyouarepayingattention

YesWillreworkwithCurrenttemplatedownloadedfromwebpage.
SecondisNetamiStuartLandscapeArchitectinSpecialProjectsofPDCP.

Thanksagain,
Lori

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June08158:48AM
To:LoriEllis;AlexMut
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Hello, Lori:
Before you start on re-working this call, could you please check with Alex? he had issued a call for Humber Bay Shores
last year for park and trail improvements. Please assure that there is no overlap of services.
tks! . . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June7,201511:02
To:LoriEllis
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtempalte
Good Morning, Lori:
Had a look at your Humber Bay Shores package, and it would appear that you used a template that is two years
out of date. Please see our webpage to get our latest RFP template and use it to prepp the doc. The revised
template contains a lot of information and direction that you will find useful in the preparation of the call, so it is
well worth always downloading a clean copy from the webpage.
And by the way . . . Who is your second on this?
rgds . . . hmv

53

PFR

56

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
July-06-15 9:55 AM
Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park - East and West - UPDATED RFP template and
attachments
HBayPark-EW RFP-rev_6Jul2015.docx

HiLori,
IamsorrythatIupsetMike.IdidnotknowwhichpartsoftheRFPhewasgoingtomodifyandwhichpartswereupto
us.

FYIheiswrong,thedocumentIsentwasbasedonthemostrecenttemplate.TherearenodefinitionsmissingandI
removedthePanAmclausebecausePanAmwillbeoverbythetimethisgoesout.Iwillputitbacksothathecan
removeit.

Sorryaboutthecallnumber,IhavereplaceditwiththenewoneTHROUGHOUTthedocument.Ithoughthewasgoing
todothat.

Again,sorryforgettingyouonMike'swrongside.Reupdateddocumentattached.

Best,

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:July051510:28AM
To:LoriEllis
Cc:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParkEastandWestUPDATEDRFPtemplateandattachments
Hello,Lori'
Hadalookatyourdocandfindthatitisn'tthelatesttemplate:
1/themanagerislistedasDavidFerguson,who'snotbeenwiththeCityforoverayear.
2/thecallnumberdatesto2013
3/thePanAminformationwasmissing
4/Insection1,definitionsweremissing(well,oneanywayandthat'sasfarasIgot)
IcouldoverlookacoupleofthingsbutpleaseunderstandI'veunfortunatelynotthetimerightnowtogothroughthe
docsclausebyclausetoassurethateverythingthat'sbeenaddedinthepasttwoyearsisinyourdraft.
Pleasealwaysgotoourwebpageanddownloadthelatesttemplate.CurrentlythelatestRFPwasreleased4.June.
tks!...hmv

From:LoriEllis
Sent:June22,20151:02PM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParkEastandWestUPDATEDRFPtemplateandattachments

54

PFR

57

Mike,
As requested Please see attached RFP for 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park - East and West.
Please confirm when received and provide me with a time-line for follow-up Thanks.
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483

From:LoriEllis
Sent:June08159:01AM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:NetamiStuart;AlexMut
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Mike,

GoodMorningtoyouaswell.
SorryIdidnotcompletelyrespondtoyouremailbelow.Hereisthemorecompleteresponse!

AlexandIworkedonthecallforHumberBayShoresTrailImprovementstogether.Theyarecompletelydifferent
projectswithverysimilarnamesandarerightbesideeachother(toaddtotheconfusion).
ThisprojectiscalledHumberBayParkEastandWest.Theother(theoneAlexsubmittedlastyear)iscalledHumber
BayShoresParkTrailImprovements.

Iwillensurethatthereisnooverlapinthescope.
Thanksforcatchingthis.Goodtoknowyouarepayingattention

YesWillreworkwithCurrenttemplatedownloadedfromwebpage.
SecondisNetamiStuartLandscapeArchitectinSpecialProjectsofPDCP.

Thanksagain,
Lori

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June08158:48AM
To:LoriEllis;AlexMut
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Hello, Lori:
Before you start on re-working this call, could you please check with Alex? he had issued a call for Humber Bay Shores
last year for park and trail improvements. Please assure that there is no overlap of services.
tks! . . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June7,201511:02
55

PFR

58

To:LoriEllis
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtempalte
Good Morning, Lori:
Had a look at your Humber Bay Shores package, and it would appear that you used a template that is two years
out of date. Please see our webpage to get our latest RFP template and use it to prepp the doc. The revised
template contains a lot of information and direction that you will find useful in the preparation of the call, so it is
well worth always downloading a clean copy from the webpage.
And by the way . . . Who is your second on this?
rgds . . . hmv

56

PFR

59

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Lori Ellis
July-08-15 5:10 PM
Netami Stuart
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park - East and West - UPDATED RFP template and
attachments

Netami,
No worries. I will review this tomorrow before I send to Mike. I did not review it the last timewhy
duplicate excellent work
Can you please give me an 'anticipated' project schedule with milestone dates. Your preferred
timeline. Then I can work the PMMD timeframe into it at the front end.
Thanks,
Lori
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:July06159:55AM
To:LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParkEastandWestUPDATEDRFPtemplateandattachments
HiLori,
IamsorrythatIupsetMike.IdidnotknowwhichpartsoftheRFPhewasgoingtomodifyandwhichpartswereupto
us.

FYIheiswrong,thedocumentIsentwasbasedonthemostrecenttemplate.TherearenodefinitionsmissingandI
removedthePanAmclausebecausePanAmwillbeoverbythetimethisgoesout.Iwillputitbacksothathecan
removeit.

Sorryaboutthecallnumber,IhavereplaceditwiththenewoneTHROUGHOUTthedocument.Ithoughthewasgoing
todothat.

Again,sorryforgettingyouonMike'swrongside.Reupdateddocumentattached.

Best,

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:July051510:28AM
To:LoriEllis
Cc:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParkEastandWestUPDATEDRFPtemplateandattachments
Hello,Lori'
Hadalookatyourdocandfindthatitisn'tthelatesttemplate:
1/themanagerislistedasDavidFerguson,who'snotbeenwiththeCityforoverayear.
57

PFR

60

2/thecallnumberdatesto2013
3/thePanAminformationwasmissing
4/Insection1,definitionsweremissing(well,oneanywayandthat'sasfarasIgot)
IcouldoverlookacoupleofthingsbutpleaseunderstandI'veunfortunatelynotthetimerightnowtogothroughthe
docsclausebyclausetoassurethateverythingthat'sbeenaddedinthepasttwoyearsisinyourdraft.
Pleasealwaysgotoourwebpageanddownloadthelatesttemplate.CurrentlythelatestRFPwasreleased4.June.
tks!...hmv

From:LoriEllis
Sent:June22,20151:02PM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParkEastandWestUPDATEDRFPtemplateandattachments

Mike,
As requested Please see attached RFP for 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park - East and West.
Please confirm when received and provide me with a time-line for follow-up Thanks.
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483

From:LoriEllis
Sent:June08159:01AM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:NetamiStuart;AlexMut
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Mike,

GoodMorningtoyouaswell.
SorryIdidnotcompletelyrespondtoyouremailbelow.Hereisthemorecompleteresponse!

AlexandIworkedonthecallforHumberBayShoresTrailImprovementstogether.Theyarecompletelydifferent
projectswithverysimilarnamesandarerightbesideeachother(toaddtotheconfusion).
ThisprojectiscalledHumberBayParkEastandWest.Theother(theoneAlexsubmittedlastyear)iscalledHumber
BayShoresParkTrailImprovements.

Iwillensurethatthereisnooverlapinthescope.
Thanksforcatchingthis.Goodtoknowyouarepayingattention

YesWillreworkwithCurrenttemplatedownloadedfromwebpage.
SecondisNetamiStuartLandscapeArchitectinSpecialProjectsofPDCP.

58

PFR

61

Thanksagain,
Lori

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June08158:48AM
To:LoriEllis;AlexMut
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtemplate
Hello, Lori:
Before you start on re-working this call, could you please check with Alex? he had issued a call for Humber Bay Shores
last year for park and trail improvements. Please assure that there is no overlap of services.
tks! . . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:June7,201511:02
To:LoriEllis
Subject:9118155046HumberBayshoresandnewRFPtempalte
Good Morning, Lori:
Had a look at your Humber Bay Shores package, and it would appear that you used a template that is two years
out of date. Please see our webpage to get our latest RFP template and use it to prepp the doc. The revised
template contains a lot of information and direction that you will find useful in the preparation of the call, so it is
well worth always downloading a clean copy from the webpage.
And by the way . . . Who is your second on this?
rgds . . . hmv

59

PFR

62

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
September-28-15 10:39 AM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 rev01.doc

Iwillcallyouat11am,onceI'vegotacoffeeinhand.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:September281510:34AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046AddNr02rev01.doc

Hello, Netami:
please review the attached and give me a call.
tks! . . . hmv

60

PFR

63

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
September-28-15 12:21 PM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 rev01.doc

Hopethisworks:

BiddersareadvisedthatRFP9118155046(HumberBayParkMasterPlan)willbeawardedseparatelyand
independentlyofRFP9118155070(NewPavilioninHumberBayParkEast).Whereproponentteamsortheir
membersarebiddingonbothprojects,noassumptionsshallbemadeonthesuccessoneitherorbothbids.The
deliverables,meetingsandstaffresourcesforeachprojectareindependentoftheotherandshallnotoverlap.

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:September281510:42AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046AddNr02rev01.doc

Section 14(1)

Hello, Netami:

Please use this copy for our discussions, it has all the formatting tracks removed. I'll explain later.
. . . hmv

61

PFR

64

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Mike Voelker
September-28-15 3:16 PM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 rev01.doc
9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 rev01.doc

Try this.
I've made a couple more comments in the questions section.
rgds . . . hmv

62

PFR

65

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
September-28-15 3:50 PM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 rev01.doc
9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 rev01 nks.doc

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:September28153:16PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046AddNr02rev01.doc

Try this.
I've made a couple more comments in the questions section.
rgds . . . hmv

63

PFR

66

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
September-28-15 4:32 PM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Questions re. Humber Bay Park MP and Phase 1 Implementation

1. There are two lists that state the mandatory technical services required (see pg 5 and pg 24). The
list on pg 24 includes an architect, while the list on pg 5 does not. Is an architect required?
Refer to Addendum 2, Item 2. An architect is not required.
2. Information given at the mandatory site meeting implied that that bentonite clay liner of the
pond was in good shape. Section 3.1.1.d states that a condition assessment of the liner is
required. Is an assessment of the liner required?
An assessment of the liner in sufficient detail to make an informed recommendation for the pond
system is required.
3. Section 3.4.1a states that Phase 1 will include revitalization of the ponds. Does this include
mechanical and electrical improvements recommended in the "Inventory, Condition Report &
Feasibility Study: Internal Pond-Canal System"?
ScopeofworkforPhase1willbedeterminedduringthePublicConsultationandMasterPlan
process.TheInventory,ConditionReportandFeasibilityStudyfortheInternalPondCanalSystemis
requiredaspartoftheMasterPlan.

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:September28153:21PM
To:'KerrieHarvey'
Subject:9118155046Questionsre.HumberBayParkMPandPhase1Implementation
Good Afternoon, Kerrie
Thank you for your e-mail.
I have forwarded your question to the project manager for consideration and review.
We will respond to your request, either directly or through an addendum, as soon as possible.
With regards . . . Mike Voelker

From:KerrieHarvey[mailto:kharvey@planpart.ca]
Sent:September28,201511:51
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:Questionsre.HumberBayParkMPandPhase1Implementation

Hi Mike,
We have a couple of questions regarding the Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1
Implementation RFP. We understand that the deadline for questions has passed, but are hoping to get a
response since the proposal deadline has been extended to October 7th.
64

PFR

67

1. There are two lists that state the mandatory technical services required (see pg 5 and pg 24). The list on
pg 24 includes an architect, while the list on pg 5 does not. Is an architect required?
2. Information given at the mandatory site meeting implied that that bentonite clay liner of the
pond was in good shape. Section 3.1.1.d states that a condition assessment of the liner is
required. Is an assessment of the liner required?
3. Section 3.4.1a states that Phase 1 will include revitalization of the ponds. Does this include
mechanical and electrical improvements recommended in the "Inventory, Condition Report &
Feasibility Study: Internal Pond-Canal System"?
Thank you,

Kerrie Harvey
Landscape Architect
BScH, MLA, OALA
Landscape + Urban Ecology
e kharvey@planpart.ca
p 416.975.1556 ext 269
f 416.975.1580

1255 Bay Street, Suite 500


Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5R 2A9

65

PFR

68

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Mike Voelker
September-29-15 8:36 AM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 revFINAL.doc
9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 revFINAL.doc

Hello, Netami:
Final approval requested.
tks! . . . hmv

66

PFR

69

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
September-29-15 9:29 AM
Mike Voelker
Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 revFINAL.doc
9118-15-5046 Add Nr02 revFINAL.DOC

Approved.Thankyou.

Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:September29158:36AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046AddNr02revFINAL.doc

Hello, Netami:
Final approval requested.
tks! . . . hmv

67

PFR

70

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
September-30-15 3:28 PM
Lori Ellis
Alma Salcedo; Brenda Duffley; Mike Voelker
RE: RFP 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation Addendum 02

PleaseseeanswerstoErinPietersma'squestionsbelowinRED:

1. WhatlevelofdetaileddesignisexpectedforPhase1DetailedDesign?Forexample,preliminarydesignsto50%
andtypicaldetailsorFinalizeddesignsto99%andfullconstructiondetails?
Thevendorisexpectedtoproduce80%designwithtypicaldetailsanddraftconstructiondetails.

2. Doesthe$15,000.00AllowanceonForm8forPhase1DetailDesignmeanthattheProponentdoesnotinclude
costingforStage5intheirproposal?
The$15,000allowanceistocoverStage4,Phase1DetailedDesignandCosting.

HelloMr.Voelker,

Belowpleasefindalistingofourquestionsfortheabovenotedforyourreviewandresponse.

1. Pleaseconfirmtheanticipatedscheduleforeachstageofwork,andspecifically:
a. AnticipatedscheduleforcompletionoftheMasterPlan;and
b. AnticipatedscheduleforpreparationofTenderDocumentsforPhase1.
PleaserefertoAddendum#2

2. Thelistingofkeystaffandmandatoryservicesdiffersonpage5versuspage24.Pleaseclarifythekeystaffand
mandatoryprofessionalandtechnicalservices.
PleaserefertoAddendum#2
3. Pleaseclarifythescopeofworkforstructuralengineeringservices.
PleaserefertoAddendum#2
4. Pleaseclarifythescopeofworkforthelightingdesigner.
ThelightingdesignershallpreparethelightingdesignfortheMasterPlan.

5. TheScopeofworkforPhase1DetailedDesignisidentifiedonpage13howevertheRFPstatesthatscopewill
bedeterminedthroughthepublicconsultationprocess.Isthescopeofwork,asstatedonpage13,limitedto:
revitalizationofponds,enhancementandreconfigurationandreconstructionoftheprimarywalkingtrails
withintheprecinct.?
68

PFR

71

PleaserefertoAddendum#2

6. UnderExperienceandQualificationsoftheProponent,pleaseconfirmif4projectexamplesarerequiredfor
eachsubconsultant,inadditionto4projectexamplesfortheProponentORif4projectexamplesarerequired
intotal.
a. If4projectexamplesarerequiredintotal,canthe4projectexamplesbecomprisedofexamplesfrom
boththeProponentandsubconsultants?
Projectexamplesshallreflecttheexperienceandqualificationsoftheleadconsultant.

7. AretheLetterofIntroduction,TableofContentsandExecutiveSummaryincludedinthepagelimit?
No.

8. HasanEnvironmentalAssessmentbeencompletedfortheHumberBayparkland?
a. DoestheCityanticipatethananEnvironmentalAssessmentwillneedtobecompleted?Ifso,willthe
Cityberesponsibleforitscompletion?
AnEnvironmentalAssessmenthasnotbeencompletedandwillnotberequired.

9. WilltheCityconsiderprovidinganextensionontheRFPclosingdate?
PleaserefertoAddendum#1

10. WilltheCityconsiderproposalsthatexceedthepreferred24pagelimit?
No.

Thankyou.

Sincerely,

ERIN PIETERSMA, BLA OALA CSLA ASLA


Landscape Architect

223 McLeod Street | Ottawa, ON | K2P 0Z8


T: 613.730.5709 ext.285 | M: 613.558.6217
fotenn.com

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.


ThisEmailmessageandattachmentsmaycontainprivilegedandconfidentialinformation.Ifyouhavereceivedthismessageinerror,pleasereplybyEmailtothesenderand
subsequentlydestroyanddeleteanycopiesofthisEmailandattachments.Thankyouforyourcooperation.
Linformationtransmiseeststrictementrservelapersonneoulorganismeauquelelleestadresseetpeuttredenatureconfidentielle.Sivousavezreucette
informationparerreurveuillezcontactersonexpditeurimmdiatementparretourducourrierlectroniquepuissupprimercetteinformationycompristoutespicesjointes
sansenavoircopidivulguoudiffuslecontenu.Mercidevotrecoopration.

69

PFR

72

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Mike Voelker
October-01-15 11:02 AM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 - Add Nr03 rev01.doc
9118-15-5046 Add Nr03 rev01.doc

Netami:
Please review and advise.
. . . hmv

70

PFR

73

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
October-01-15 11:30 AM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Add Nr03 rev01.doc
9118-15-5046 Add Nr03 rev01 nks.doc

Pleaseseemecomments.Otherwiseit'sgreat.

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:October011511:02AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046AddNr03rev01.doc

Netami:
Please review and advise.
. . . hmv

71

PFR

74

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Mike Voelker
October-01-15 11:42 AM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 Add Nr03 rev02.doc
9118-15-5046 Add Nr03 rev02.doc

Netami:
One last change to the doc. you'd addressed the issue in two of the three instances where it occurred, but Q1 was left
untouched. Please approve or modify at will.
rgds . . . hmv

72

PFR

75

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
October-01-15 11:43 AM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 Add Nr03 rev02.doc

Approvedassent.

Regards,
nks

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:October011511:42AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046AddNr03rev02.doc

Netami:
One last change to the doc. you'd addressed the issue in two of the three instances where it occurred, but Q1 was left
untouched. Please approve or modify at will.
rgds . . . hmv

73

PFR

76

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Lori Ellis
October-01-15 2:09 PM
Netami Stuart
FW: RFP NO. 9118-15-5046
9118-15-5046 Addendum No. 3.pdf

Netami,
For you
Lori

From:SuzanneBloomfield
Sent:October01151:51PM
To:LoriEllis
Cc:MikeVoelker
Subject:RFPNO.9118155046

Please see the attached addendum.


Suzanne

74

PFR

77

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
October-01-15 3:27 PM
'Jeremy Craig'
Victor Ford
9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park master plan

GoodAfternoon,Jeremy;

Thankyouforyouremail.
Ihaveforwardedyourrequesttotheprojectmanagerforconsiderationandreview.
Wewillrespondtoyourrequest,eitherdirectlyorthroughanaddendum,assoonaspossible.
Pleasenote,thatunlessotherwiseadvisedthroughanaddendum,theclosingdatewillremainunchanged.

Withregards...MikeVoelker

MikeVoelker,CSCMP
SeniorCorporateBuyer
ConstructionServices,PurchasingandMaterialsManagementCityofToronto19thFloor,WestTower,CityHall
100QueenStreetWest,
Toronto,OntarioM5H2N2

mvoelke@toronto.ca
(416)3380487

OriginalMessage
From:JeremyCraig[mailto:jeremy@victorford.ca]
Sent:October1,201515:16
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:VictorFord
Subject:Re:CityofTorontoCallDocument#9118155046Addendum

GoodafternoonMike,

I'vehadaquickscanoftoday'saddendumandnotedthatarequestforafurtherextensionwassubmittedandturned
down.

Iamwritingtorequestthatthecityreconsiderthis,andofferafurtherextension.Thechangesinaddendum2were
quitesignificantwithregardtotheproposals.

Thankyouforconsideringthisrequest.

JeremyCraig
VictorFordandAssociatesInc

SentusingOWAforiPhone
75

PFR

78

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
October-02-15 9:03 AM
Lori Ellis
Fw: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park master plan

Moretime?Whatdoyouthink?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
OriginalMessage
From:MikeVoelker<mvoelke@toronto.ca>
Sent:Thursday,October1,20153:26PM
To:'JeremyCraig'
Cc:VictorFord
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParkmasterplan

GoodAfternoon,Jeremy;

Thankyouforyouremail.
Ihaveforwardedyourrequesttotheprojectmanagerforconsiderationandreview.
Wewillrespondtoyourrequest,eitherdirectlyorthroughanaddendum,assoonaspossible.
Pleasenote,thatunlessotherwiseadvisedthroughanaddendum,theclosingdatewillremainunchanged.

Withregards...MikeVoelker

MikeVoelker,CSCMP
SeniorCorporateBuyer
ConstructionServices,PurchasingandMaterialsManagementCityofToronto19thFloor,WestTower,CityHall
100QueenStreetWest,
Toronto,OntarioM5H2N2

mvoelke@toronto.ca
(416)3380487

OriginalMessage
From:JeremyCraig[mailto:jeremy@victorford.ca]
Sent:October1,201515:16
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:VictorFord
Subject:Re:CityofTorontoCallDocument#9118155046Addendum

GoodafternoonMike,

76

PFR

79

I'vehadaquickscanoftoday'saddendumandnotedthatarequestforafurtherextensionwassubmittedandturned
down.

Iamwritingtorequestthatthecityreconsiderthis,andofferafurtherextension.Thechangesinaddendum2were
quitesignificantwithregardtotheproposals.

Thankyouforconsideringthisrequest.

JeremyCraig
VictorFordandAssociatesInc

SentusingOWAforiPhone

77

PFR

80

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
October-05-15 7:02 AM
'Erin Pietersma'
9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation Addendum 03

Good Morning, Erin;


Thank you for your e-mail.
I have forwarded your questions to the project manager for consideration and review.
We will respond to your request, either directly or through an addendum, as soon as possible.
With regards . . . Mike Voelker

From:ErinPietersma[mailto:pietersma@fotenn.com]
Sent:October2,201516:15
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParkMasterPlanandPhase1ImplementationAddendum03

HelloMike,

Asdiscussed,belowpleasefindmyformalizedquestionregardingAddendum03foryourreviewandresponse.

1. OurquestionQ4.wastryingtoascertainifthe$15KallowanceforPhase1DetailedDesignindicated
thattheProponentisnotrequiredtoincludepricingforthisstageintheirproposal.Thisisafollowup
clarificationtoconfirmifthisisthecaseandifthe$15KallocatedforPhase1DetailedDesignis(1)a
fixedamount;or(2)abestguessassignedbytheCity.Basedonourunderstanding,detaileddesign
wouldtypicallyrepresentapproximately40%oftheoverallbudget.
2. Basedontheallowanceof$15KforPhase1DetailedDesign,pleaseconfirmifthebudgetfortheMaster
Planis$310,000$360,000.
Thankyou,
Erin

From: Mike Voelker [mailto:mvoelke@toronto.ca]


Sent: September-30-15 2:57 PM
To: Erin Pietersma
Subject: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation - Addendum 02

Good afternoon, Erin;


Thank you for your e-mail.
I have forwarded your question to the project manager for consideration and review.
We will respond to your request, either directly or through an addendum, as soon as possible.
With regards . . . Mike Voelker
Mike Voelker, CSCMP
78

PFR

81

Senior Corporate Buyer


Construction Services, Purchasing and Materials Management
City of Toronto
19th Floor, West Tower, City Hall
100 Queen Street West,
Toronto, Ontario M5H 2N2
mvoelke@toronto.ca
(416) 338-0487

From:ErinPietersma[mailto:pietersma@fotenn.com]
Sent:September29,201517:26
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:RFP9118155046HumberBayParkMasterPlanandPhase1ImplementationAddendum
02

HelloMike,

FollowinguponAddendum02,canyoupleaseprovideclarificationonthefollowing:

1. WhatlevelofdetaileddesignisexpectedforPhase1DetailedDesign?Forexample,preliminary
designsto50%andtypicaldetailsorFinalizeddesignsto99%andfullconstructiondetails?
2.

Doesthe$15,000.00AllowanceonForm8forPhase1DetailDesignmeanthattheProponent
doesnotincludecostingforStage5intheirproposal?

Thankyou.

Sincerely,
Erin

From: Erin Pietersma


Sent: September-25-15 9:27 AM
To: 'mvoelke@toronto.ca'
Subject: RE: RFP 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation

GoodmorningMike,

CanyoupleaseconfirmifyouwillbeissuinganAddendumfortheabovenotedtoday?

Thankyou.

Sincerely,
Erin

From: Erin Pietersma


Sent: September-22-15 3:21 PM
To: 'mvoelke@toronto.ca'
Subject: RFP 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation
79

PFR

82


HelloMr.Voelker,

Belowpleasefindalistingofourquestionsfortheabovenotedforyourreviewandresponse.

1. Pleaseconfirmtheanticipatedscheduleforeachstageofwork,andspecifically:
a.

AnticipatedscheduleforcompletionoftheMasterPlan;and

b. AnticipatedscheduleforpreparationofTenderDocumentsforPhase1.
2.

Thelistingofkeystaffandmandatoryservicesdiffersonpage5versuspage24.Pleaseclarify
thekeystaffandmandatoryprofessionalandtechnicalservices.

3.

Pleaseclarifythescopeofworkforstructuralengineeringservices.

4.

Pleaseclarifythescopeofworkforthelightingdesigner.

5.

TheScopeofworkforPhase1DetailedDesignisidentifiedonpage13howevertheRFPstates
thatscopewillbedeterminedthroughthepublicconsultationprocess.Isthescopeofwork,as
statedonpage13,limitedto:revitalizationofponds,enhancementandreconfigurationand
reconstructionoftheprimarywalkingtrailswithintheprecinct.?

6.

UnderExperienceandQualificationsoftheProponent,pleaseconfirmif4projectexamplesare
requiredforeachsubconsultant,inadditionto4projectexamplesfortheProponentORif4
projectexamplesarerequiredintotal.
a.

If4projectexamplesarerequiredintotal,canthe4projectexamplesbecomprisedof
examplesfromboththeProponentandsubconsultants?

7.

AretheLetterofIntroduction,TableofContentsandExecutiveSummaryincludedinthepage
limit?

8.

HasanEnvironmentalAssessmentbeencompletedfortheHumberBayparkland?
a.

9.

DoestheCityanticipatethananEnvironmentalAssessmentwillneedtobe
completed?Ifso,willtheCityberesponsibleforitscompletion?

WilltheCityconsiderprovidinganextensionontheRFPclosingdate?

10. WilltheCityconsiderproposalsthatexceedthepreferred24pagelimit?

Thankyou.

Sincerely,

ERIN PIETERSMA, BLA OALA CSLA ASLA


Landscape Architect

80

PFR

83

223 McLeod Street | Ottawa, ON | K2P 0Z8


T: 613.730.5709 ext.285 | M: 613.558.6217
fotenn.com

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.


ThisEmailmessageandattachmentsmaycontainprivilegedandconfidentialinformation.Ifyouhavereceivedthismessageinerror,pleasereplybyE
mailtothesenderandsubsequentlydestroyanddeleteanycopiesofthisEmailandattachments.Thankyouforyourcooperation.
Linformationtransmiseeststrictementrservelapersonneoulorganismeauquelelleestadresseetpeuttredenatureconfidentielle.Sivous
avezreucetteinformationparerreurveuillezcontactersonexpditeurimmdiatementparretourducourrierlectroniquepuissupprimercette
informationycompristoutespicesjointessansenavoircopidivulguoudiffuslecontenu.Mercidevotrecoopration.

81

PFR

84

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
October-05-15 12:01 PM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation Addendum 03

WearewillingtoextendthedeadlinetoOctober14th,givenJeremy'srequest.
InanswertoErin'squestionsbelow:

1. OurquestionQ4.wastryingtoascertainifthe$15KallowanceforPhase1DetailedDesignindicated
thattheProponentisnotrequiredtoincludepricingforthisstageintheirproposal.Thisisafollowup
clarificationtoconfirmifthisisthecaseandifthe$15KallocatedforPhase1DetailedDesignis(1)a
fixedamount;or(2)abestguessassignedbytheCity.Basedonourunderstanding,detaileddesign
wouldtypicallyrepresentapproximately40%oftheoverallbudget.
TheCityhasassignedanallowancevalueof$15KfortheDetailDesignofPhase1.Thiswasdoneinordertoremovethe
uncertaintyforproponentsofassigningacostfortheworkwhenthescopeofPhase1isnotyetdetermined.The
proponentisnotrequiredtoprovidepricingforthisportionoftheworkbeyondtheassignedallowanceof$15K.

2. Basedontheallowanceof$15KforPhase1DetailedDesign,pleaseconfirmifthebudgetfortheMaster
Planis$310,000$360,000.
ThebudgetforthescopeofworkasdescribedintheRFPis,asstated,$325,000.00to$375,000.00.Thisincludesa
$15,000allowanceforthedetaildesignofPhase1.

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:October05157:02AM
To:'ErinPietersma'
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParkMasterPlanandPhase1ImplementationAddendum03

Good Morning, Erin;


Thank you for your e-mail.
I have forwarded your questions to the project manager for consideration and review.
We will respond to your request, either directly or through an addendum, as soon as possible.
With regards . . . Mike Voelker

From:ErinPietersma[mailto:pietersma@fotenn.com]
Sent:October2,201516:15
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParkMasterPlanandPhase1ImplementationAddendum03

HelloMike,

Asdiscussed,belowpleasefindmyformalizedquestionregardingAddendum03foryourreviewandresponse.
82

PFR

85


1. OurquestionQ4.wastryingtoascertainifthe$15KallowanceforPhase1DetailedDesignindicatedthatthe
Proponentisnotrequiredtoincludepricingforthisstageintheirproposal.Thisisafollowupclarificationto
confirmifthisisthecaseandifthe$15KallocatedforPhase1DetailedDesignis(1)afixedamount;or(2)a
bestguessassignedbytheCity.Basedonourunderstanding,detaileddesignwouldtypicallyrepresent
approximately40%oftheoverallbudget.
2. Basedontheallowanceof$15KforPhase1DetailedDesign,pleaseconfirmifthebudgetfortheMaster
Planis$310,000$360,000.
Thankyou,
Erin

From: Mike Voelker [mailto:mvoelke@toronto.ca]


Sent: September-30-15 2:57 PM
To: Erin Pietersma
Subject: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation - Addendum 02

Good afternoon, Erin;


Thank you for your e-mail.
I have forwarded your question to the project manager for consideration and review.
We will respond to your request, either directly or through an addendum, as soon as possible.
With regards . . . Mike Voelker
Mike Voelker, CSCMP
Senior Corporate Buyer
Construction Services, Purchasing and Materials Management
City of Toronto
19th Floor, West Tower, City Hall
100 Queen Street West,
Toronto, Ontario M5H 2N2
mvoelke@toronto.ca
(416) 338-0487

From:ErinPietersma[mailto:pietersma@fotenn.com]
Sent:September29,201517:26
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:RFP9118155046HumberBayParkMasterPlanandPhase1ImplementationAddendum
02

HelloMike,

FollowinguponAddendum02,canyoupleaseprovideclarificationonthefollowing:

1. WhatlevelofdetaileddesignisexpectedforPhase1DetailedDesign?Forexample,preliminary
designsto50%andtypicaldetailsorFinalizeddesignsto99%andfullconstructiondetails?

83

PFR

86

2.

Doesthe$15,000.00AllowanceonForm8forPhase1DetailDesignmeanthattheProponent
doesnotincludecostingforStage5intheirproposal?

Thankyou.

Sincerely,
Erin

From: Erin Pietersma


Sent: September-25-15 9:27 AM
To: 'mvoelke@toronto.ca'
Subject: RE: RFP 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation

GoodmorningMike,

CanyoupleaseconfirmifyouwillbeissuinganAddendumfortheabovenotedtoday?

Thankyou.

Sincerely,
Erin

From: Erin Pietersma


Sent: September-22-15 3:21 PM
To: 'mvoelke@toronto.ca'
Subject: RFP 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation

HelloMr.Voelker,

Belowpleasefindalistingofourquestionsfortheabovenotedforyourreviewandresponse.

1. Pleaseconfirmtheanticipatedscheduleforeachstageofwork,andspecifically:
a.

AnticipatedscheduleforcompletionoftheMasterPlan;and

b. AnticipatedscheduleforpreparationofTenderDocumentsforPhase1.
2.

Thelistingofkeystaffandmandatoryservicesdiffersonpage5versuspage24.Pleaseclarify
thekeystaffandmandatoryprofessionalandtechnicalservices.

3.

Pleaseclarifythescopeofworkforstructuralengineeringservices.

4.

Pleaseclarifythescopeofworkforthelightingdesigner.

5.

TheScopeofworkforPhase1DetailedDesignisidentifiedonpage13howevertheRFPstates
thatscopewillbedeterminedthroughthepublicconsultationprocess.Isthescopeofwork,as
statedonpage13,limitedto:revitalizationofponds,enhancementandreconfigurationand
reconstructionoftheprimarywalkingtrailswithintheprecinct.?

84

PFR

87

6.

UnderExperienceandQualificationsoftheProponent,pleaseconfirmif4projectexamplesare
requiredforeachsubconsultant,inadditionto4projectexamplesfortheProponentORif4
projectexamplesarerequiredintotal.
a.

If4projectexamplesarerequiredintotal,canthe4projectexamplesbecomprisedof
examplesfromboththeProponentandsubconsultants?

7.

AretheLetterofIntroduction,TableofContentsandExecutiveSummaryincludedinthepage
limit?

8.

HasanEnvironmentalAssessmentbeencompletedfortheHumberBayparkland?
a.

9.

DoestheCityanticipatethananEnvironmentalAssessmentwillneedtobe
completed?Ifso,willtheCityberesponsibleforitscompletion?

WilltheCityconsiderprovidinganextensionontheRFPclosingdate?

10. WilltheCityconsiderproposalsthatexceedthepreferred24pagelimit?

Thankyou.

Sincerely,

ERIN PIETERSMA, BLA OALA CSLA ASLA


Landscape Architect

223 McLeod Street | Ottawa, ON | K2P 0Z8


T: 613.730.5709 ext.285 | M: 613.558.6217
fotenn.com

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.


ThisEmailmessageandattachmentsmaycontainprivilegedandconfidentialinformation.Ifyouhavereceivedthismessageinerror,pleasereplybyE
mailtothesenderandsubsequentlydestroyanddeleteanycopiesofthisEmailandattachments.Thankyouforyourcooperation.
Linformationtransmiseeststrictementrservelapersonneoulorganismeauquelelleestadresseetpeuttredenatureconfidentielle.Sivous
avezreucetteinformationparerreurveuillezcontactersonexpditeurimmdiatementparretourducourrierlectroniquepuissupprimercette
informationycompristoutespicesjointessansenavoircopidivulguoudiffuslecontenu.Mercidevotrecoopration.

85

PFR

88

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
October-05-15 1:08 PM
'Erin Pietersma'
9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation Addendum 03

Good Afternoon, Ms. Pietersma:


I have reviewed your questions with the project manager:

ThebudgetforthescopeofworkasdescribedintheRFPis,asperSection2.3(asrevisedinAddendumNo.2and
confirmedinAddendumNo.3),$325,000.00to$375,000.00.Thisincludesa$15,000allowanceforthedetaildesignof
Phase1.

ThescopeofworkfortheprojectisdescribedinAddendum2,Item6andincludesDetailDesignofPhase1.
Withregards...MikeVoelker

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:October5,201507:02
To:'ErinPietersma'
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParkMasterPlanandPhase1ImplementationAddendum03

Good Morning, Erin;


Thank you for your e-mail.
I have forwarded your questions to the project manager for consideration and review.
We will respond to your request, either directly or through an addendum, as soon as possible.
With regards . . . Mike Voelker

From:ErinPietersma[mailto:pietersma@fotenn.com]
Sent:October2,201516:15
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParkMasterPlanandPhase1ImplementationAddendum03

HelloMike,

Asdiscussed,belowpleasefindmyformalizedquestionregardingAddendum03foryourreviewand
response.

1. OurquestionQ4.wastryingtoascertainifthe$15KallowanceforPhase1DetailedDesign
indicatedthattheProponentisnotrequiredtoincludepricingforthisstageintheirproposal.
Thisisafollowupclarificationtoconfirmifthisisthecaseandifthe$15KallocatedforPhase1
DetailedDesignis(1)afixedamount;or(2)abestguessassignedbytheCity.Basedonour
understanding,detaileddesignwouldtypicallyrepresentapproximately40%oftheoverall
budget.
86

PFR

89

2. Basedontheallowanceof$15KforPhase1DetailedDesign,pleaseconfirmifthebudgetfor
theMasterPlanis$310,000$360,000.
Thankyou,
Erin

From: Mike Voelker [mailto:mvoelke@toronto.ca]


Sent: September-30-15 2:57 PM
To: Erin Pietersma
Subject: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation - Addendum 02

Good afternoon, Erin;


Thank you for your e-mail.
I have forwarded your question to the project manager for consideration and review.
We will respond to your request, either directly or through an addendum, as soon as possible.
With regards . . . Mike Voelker
Mike Voelker, CSCMP
Senior Corporate Buyer
Construction Services, Purchasing and Materials Management
City of Toronto
19th Floor, West Tower, City Hall
100 Queen Street West,
Toronto, Ontario M5H 2N2
mvoelke@toronto.ca
(416) 338-0487

From:ErinPietersma[mailto:pietersma@fotenn.com]
Sent:September29,201517:26
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:RFP9118155046HumberBayParkMasterPlanandPhase1Implementation
Addendum02

HelloMike,

FollowinguponAddendum02,canyoupleaseprovideclarificationonthefollowing:

1. WhatlevelofdetaileddesignisexpectedforPhase1DetailedDesign?Forexample,
preliminarydesignsto50%andtypicaldetailsorFinalizeddesignsto99%andfull
constructiondetails?
2.

Doesthe$15,000.00AllowanceonForm8forPhase1DetailDesignmeanthatthe
ProponentdoesnotincludecostingforStage5intheirproposal?

Thankyou.

Sincerely,
87

PFR

90

Erin

From: Erin Pietersma


Sent: September-25-15 9:27 AM
To: 'mvoelke@toronto.ca'
Subject: RE: RFP 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation

GoodmorningMike,

CanyoupleaseconfirmifyouwillbeissuinganAddendumfortheabovenotedtoday?

Thankyou.

Sincerely,
Erin

From: Erin Pietersma


Sent: September-22-15 3:21 PM
To: 'mvoelke@toronto.ca'
Subject: RFP 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Implementation

HelloMr.Voelker,

Belowpleasefindalistingofourquestionsfortheabovenotedforyourreviewandresponse.

1. Pleaseconfirmtheanticipatedscheduleforeachstageofwork,andspecifically:
a.

AnticipatedscheduleforcompletionoftheMasterPlan;and

b. AnticipatedscheduleforpreparationofTenderDocumentsforPhase1.
2.

Thelistingofkeystaffandmandatoryservicesdiffersonpage5versuspage24.Please
clarifythekeystaffandmandatoryprofessionalandtechnicalservices.

3.

Pleaseclarifythescopeofworkforstructuralengineeringservices.

4.

Pleaseclarifythescopeofworkforthelightingdesigner.

5.

TheScopeofworkforPhase1DetailedDesignisidentifiedonpage13howeverthe
RFPstatesthatscopewillbedeterminedthroughthepublicconsultationprocess.Isthe
scopeofwork,asstatedonpage13,limitedto:revitalizationofponds,enhancement
andreconfigurationandreconstructionoftheprimarywalkingtrailswithinthe
precinct.?

6.

UnderExperienceandQualificationsoftheProponent,pleaseconfirmif4project
examplesarerequiredforeachsubconsultant,inadditionto4projectexamplesforthe
ProponentORif4projectexamplesarerequiredintotal.
a.

If4projectexamplesarerequiredintotal,canthe4projectexamplesbe
comprisedofexamplesfromboththeProponentandsubconsultants?

88

PFR

91

7.

AretheLetterofIntroduction,TableofContentsandExecutiveSummaryincludedin
thepagelimit?

8.

HasanEnvironmentalAssessmentbeencompletedfortheHumberBayparkland?
a.

9.

DoestheCityanticipatethananEnvironmentalAssessmentwillneedtobe
completed?Ifso,willtheCityberesponsibleforitscompletion?

WilltheCityconsiderprovidinganextensionontheRFPclosingdate?

10. WilltheCityconsiderproposalsthatexceedthepreferred24pagelimit?

Thankyou.

Sincerely,

ERIN PIETERSMA, BLA OALA CSLA ASLA


Landscape Architect

223 McLeod Street | Ottawa, ON | K2P 0Z8


T: 613.730.5709 ext.285 | M: 613.558.6217
fotenn.com

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.


ThisEmailmessageandattachmentsmaycontainprivilegedandconfidentialinformation.Ifyouhavereceivedthismessageinerror,please
replybyEmailtothesenderandsubsequentlydestroyanddeleteanycopiesofthisEmailandattachments.Thankyouforyour
cooperation.
Linformationtransmiseeststrictementrservelapersonneoulorganismeauquelelleestadresseetpeuttredenature
confidentielle.Sivousavezreucetteinformationparerreurveuillezcontactersonexpditeurimmdiatementparretourducourrier
lectroniquepuissupprimercetteinformationycompristoutespicesjointessansenavoircopidivulguoudiffuslecontenu.Mercide
votrecoopration.

89

PFR

92

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
October-09-15 2:00 PM
Mike Voelker
9118-15-5046

HiMike,
Itrustwereceivedatleastthreebids.I*hope*wereceivedatleastthree.
Iwonderifyoucouldsendmethe.pdfcopiesofAddenda#1and#2.Ihavethewordversions,howevertheTRCA
wouldlikethefullofficialPDFofthecall.IhaveAddendum#3.

Also,I'llbehappytopickthesubmissionsupwheneverthey'reready.

Haveaniceweekend,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

90

PFR

93

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
October-09-15 2:01 PM
Netami Stuart
Suzanne Bloomfield
9118-15-5046 - submissions status

Suzanne will advise and supply.


tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October9,201514:00
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046

HiMike,
Itrustwereceivedatleastthreebids.I*hope*wereceivedatleastthree.
Iwonderifyoucouldsendmethe.pdfcopiesofAddenda#1and#2.Ihavethewordversions,howeverthe
TRCAwouldlikethefullofficialPDFofthecall.IhaveAddendum#3.

Also,I'llbehappytopickthesubmissionsupwheneverthey'reready.

Haveaniceweekend,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

91

PFR

94

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
October-09-15 2:06 PM
'Nancy Gaffney'; Lori Ellis
RE: Humber Bay Ponds and general HB East and West info
9118-15-5046 Addendum No. 3.pdf; 9118-15-5046 Client Copy.pdf; 9118-15-5046 Add
Nr02 revFINAL.doc; 9118-15-5046 - Add Nr.01 rev00.doc

HiNancy,
Ihaven'theardfrompurchasingyet,andIwillletyouknowwhenwe'vegotasuccessfulbidder.HerearetheRFPand
Addenda.Wetookconstructionoutofthebudget,asyou'llnoteinAddendum#2.

Cheers,
N

From:NancyGaffney[mailto:NGaffney@trca.on.ca]
Sent:October08155:10PM
To:NetamiStuart;LoriEllis
Subject:Fw:HumberBayPondsandgeneralHBEastandWestinfo
Hello
We have been compiling alot of information to give to your consultants. I have a pile at my desk already. Yell when you
are ready.
Can one of you please send me the RFP and the Addendum?
Thank you
Nancy
Nancy Gaffney BSc | Waterfront Specialist | Watershed Management Division | Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority |5 Shoreham Dr., Toronto, ON | M3N 1S4 | 416.661.6600, ext. 5313 | 416.667.6278 | * ngaffney@trca.on.ca

----- Forwarded by Nancy Gaffney/MTRCA on 10/08/2015 05:09 PM ----From:


Brian Graham/MTRCA
To:
Nancy Gaffney/MTRCA@MTRCA,
Date:
10/08/2015 08:49 AM
Subject:
Humber Bay Ponds and general HB East and West info

Hello,
We have lots of data from the Humber Bay area including;
Fisheries data going back to 1988
Bacteria samples from the hobby boat ponds
Temperature data since 2007
Sediment data since 2008 (Can go back further with hard copies)
Mussel tissue samples since 2008 (Can go back further with hard copies)
92

PFR

95

This data is from the Humber Bay to Mimico Linear Park area. Let me know what your interested in.

Brian Graham
Environmental Monitoring Technician
Environmental Monitoring and Data Management
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.
Tel: (416) 661-6600 ext: 5637 Cell: (416) 991-3751
Fax: (416) 667-6277
E-mail: bgraham@trca.on.ca
www.trca.on.ca

"*PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING, STORING OR FORWARDING THIS MESSAGE*
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this communication including any attachments may be confidential, is intended only for use of the recipient(s) named above, and may
be legally privileged. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,disclosure or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete it
permanently from your computer system.
Thank you."

93

PFR

96

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Suzanne Bloomfield
October-09-15 2:10 PM
Netami Stuart
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 - submissions status
9118-15-5046.pdf; 9118-15-5046 Addendum No. 1.pdf; 9118-15-5046 Addendum No.
2.pdf

Hi Netami,
Please see the attached.
Suzanne
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:Friday,October09,20152:01PM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046submissionsstatus

Suzanne will advise and supply.


tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October9,201514:00
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046

HiMike,
Itrustwereceivedatleastthreebids.I*hope*wereceivedatleastthree.
Iwonderifyoucouldsendmethe.pdfcopiesofAddenda#1and#2.Ihavethewordversions,howeverthe
TRCAwouldlikethefullofficialPDFofthecall.IhaveAddendum#3.

Also,I'llbehappytopickthesubmissionsupwheneverthey'reready.

Haveaniceweekend,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

94

PFR

97

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Lori Ellis
October-15-15 12:51 PM
Netami Stuart
Susan Korrick
Humber Bay Park RFP NO. 9118-15-5046
Humber Bay Park RFP-9118-15-5046- Ltr from PMMD.pdf

Netami,
Attached here is a letter from purchasing regarding Humber Bay Park RFPNO. 9118-15-5046
I picked the box up from purchasing on the 14th
7 firms submitted
I have not reviewed the submissions.
We can mobilize on this when you are back tomorrow.
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483

95

PFR

98

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
October-15-15 3:43 PM
Lori Ellis
RE: Humber Bay Park RFP NO. 9118-15-5046

s. 14(1)

Hithere,
Whataday!Oklet'stalkonthephone.Iamoutofmydesk,socallmycell,
ormybbat6474732137.
Isuggestthatyou,me,Katy,Peter(ifhe'sinvitingoneofustohisreviewteam)andmaybeanengineerorDavenosella
shouldlookatthis?

Seeyoutomorrow.

From:LoriEllis
Sent:October151512:51PM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:SusanKorrick
Subject:HumberBayParkRFPNO.9118155046

Netami,
Attached here is a letter from purchasing regarding Humber Bay Park RFPNO. 9118-15-5046
I picked the box up from purchasing on the 14th
7 firms submitted
I have not reviewed the submissions.
We can mobilize on this when you are back tomorrow.
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483

96

PFR

99

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Lori Ellis
October-15-15 4:40 PM
Netami Stuart
Re: Humber Bay Park RFP NO. 9118-15-5046

s. 14(1)

Netami,

Iwillcalltalktoyoutomorrow.
Lori
From: Netami Stuart
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 03:42 PM
To: Lori Ellis
Subject: RE: Humber Bay Park RFP NO. 9118-15-5046

s. 14(1)

Hithere,
Whataday!Oklet'stalkonthephone.Iamoutofmydesk,socallmycell,
ormybbat6474732137.
Isuggestthatyou,me,Katy,Peter(ifhe'sinvitingoneofustohisreviewteam)andmaybeanengineerorDavenosella
shouldlookatthis?

Seeyoutomorrow.

From:LoriEllis
Sent:October151512:51PM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:SusanKorrick
Subject:HumberBayParkRFPNO.9118155046

Netami,
Attached here is a letter from purchasing regarding Humber Bay Park RFPNO. 9118-15-5046
I picked the box up from purchasing on the 14th
7 firms submitted
I have not reviewed the submissions.
We can mobilize on this when you are back tomorrow.
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483

97

PFR

100

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
October-16-15 9:23 AM
Lori Ellis
RE: Humber Bay Park RFP NO. 9118-15-5046

s. 14(1)

Hithere,

I'llhappilyinvitepeopletobeonour
selectioncommitteebutIjustwanttoknowwhoyouthinkitshouldbe.DidyoutalktoPeter?

I'matmydesksopleasecallifyou'reuptoit.

Netami

From:LoriEllis
Sent:October15154:40PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:HumberBayParkRFPNO.9118155046

Netami,
.
Iwillcalltalktoyoutomorrow.
Lori
From: Netami Stuart
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 03:42 PM
To: Lori Ellis
Subject: RE: Humber Bay Park RFP NO. 9118-15-5046

Hithere,
Whataday!Oklet'stalkonthephone.Iamoutofmydesk,socallmycell,
ormybbat6474732137.
Isuggestthatyou,me,Katy,Peter(ifhe'sinvitingoneofustohisreviewteam)andmaybeanengineerorDavenosella
shouldlookatthis?

Seeyoutomorrow.

From:LoriEllis
Sent:October151512:51PM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:SusanKorrick
Subject:HumberBayParkRFPNO.9118155046

Netami,
98

PFR

101

Attached here is a letter from purchasing regarding Humber Bay Park RFPNO. 9118-15-5046
I picked the box up from purchasing on the 14th
7 firms submitted
I have not reviewed the submissions.
We can mobilize on this when you are back tomorrow.
Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALACSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
CityofToronto|Parks,Forestry+Recreation
p:4163942483

99

PFR

102

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
October-16-15 2:55 PM
Katy Aminian
Ruthanne Henry
Humber Bay RFP & Addenda
9118-15-5046 Addendum No. 2.pdf; 9118-15-5046 Addendum No. 3.pdf;
9118-15-5046 Client Copy.pdf

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

100

PFR

103

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
October-22-15 12:15 PM
Katy Aminian
RE: try again
9118-15-5046 Client Copy.pdf

Pleaseseeattached

From:KatyAminian
Sent:October221511:06AM
To:NetamiStuart;PeterKlambauer;LoriEllis;RuthanneHenry
Subject:Re:tryagain

IamOKwithanyofthosedays.CouldyoupleaseresendmeacopyoftheRFP?

Thanks,
From: Netami Stuart
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 10:16 AM
To: Katy Aminian; Peter Klambauer; Lori Ellis; Ruthanne Henry
Subject: try again

Hieveryone,
ItsoundslikeNovember2ad3rdareout.PleaseletmeknowyouravailabilityforNov.4,5and6.

Thanks,
N

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

101

PFR

104

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Nicholas Sovranl
October-22-15 1:30 PM
Netami Stuart
RE:
Copy of Proponent Evaluation (3).xlsx

HelloNetami,

UnfortunatelyIwasunabletoconnectapathtoautomaticallychangedatasimilartodatainanotherspreadsheet.
Therearesomeformulasyoucanusebutyouneedthedatainthecell.Also,theprocessIfoundshowsinsertingthe
formulaoneatatimeineachcell.Letmeknowwhatyouthink!

Thankyou,

NicholasS

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October221510:13AM
To:NicholasSovranl
Subject:

Hereyougo!

SeeifyoucanmakeitsothatIcanenterdataintoEITHERthetotalssheetORtheindividualfirmsheets.

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

102

PFR

105

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Nicholas Sovranl
October-29-15 10:57 AM
Netami Stuart
RE:
Copy of Proponent Evaluation.xlsx

GoodmorningNetami,

IhavecompletedthespreadsheetandIhavedoublecheckedtomakesureallthecellsmatchthetotalonewitheachof
thecorrespondingcellsoneachseparatesheet.However,youcanonlychangetheinformationinthecellsfromthe
totalsheetsandnottheotherway.AlsoIamhavingaproblemwiththeaverageforthetotalofeachindividual'sscore
forVictorFord&AssociatesInc.,Ihavehighlightedthecell.Enjoyyourweekend!

NicholasSovran

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October23152:25PM
To:NicholasSovranl
Subject:RE:

ThanksNicholas,that'smostexcellent!IaminEtobicoketodaysoseeyounextweek.

Haveagoodweekend,
N

From:NicholasSovranl
Sent:October22155:11PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:

HelloNetami,

Iwellhavethespreadsheetcompletedbynextweek,Iamalmosthalfwaythrough.Ihaveattachedseveralparkswithin
themeasurements.Enjoy!

NicholasS

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October221510:13AM
To:NicholasSovranl
Subject:

Hereyougo!

SeeifyoucanmakeitsothatIcanenterdataintoEITHERthetotalssheetORtheindividualfirmsheets.
103

PFR

106


NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

104

PFR

107

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Nicholas Sovranl
October-29-15 1:40 PM
Netami Stuart
RE:
Copy of Proponent Evaluation.xlsx

Iwasabletofixmyformulaerror.Iamresendingthespreadsheetsoignoremyfirstemail.

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October23152:25PM
To:NicholasSovranl
Subject:RE:

ThanksNicholas,that'smostexcellent!IaminEtobicoketodaysoseeyounextweek.

Haveagoodweekend,
N

From:NicholasSovranl
Sent:October22155:11PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:

HelloNetami,

Iwellhavethespreadsheetcompletedbynextweek,Iamalmosthalfwaythrough.Ihaveattachedseveralparkswithin
themeasurements.Enjoy!

NicholasS

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October221510:13AM
To:NicholasSovranl
Subject:

Hereyougo!

SeeifyoucanmakeitsothatIcanenterdataintoEITHERthetotalssheetORtheindividualfirmsheets.

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

105

PFR

108

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
October-29-15 2:54 PM
Peter Klambauer; Katy Aminian; Ruthanne Henry; Lori Ellis
Proposal Evaluation spreadsheet
Proponent Evaluation Table.xlsx

Higuys,pleaseusethisifyoufindithelpful.Ifyouputyourtotalsintothespreadsheet"Totals"tab,itwillpopulatethe
printableevaluationsheetsforeachfirm.

Cheers,
N

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

106

PFR

109

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Ruthanne Henry
November-04-15 9:36 AM
Netami Stuart
RE: Proposal Evaluation spreadsheet
Rhenry Insert Proponent Evaluation Table.xlsx

Hi Netami, here are my scores. I think Planning Partnership has strongest overall proposal, with
DTAH and Ramboll/Fotenn also very strong.
VFA, STLAi are solid but not quite with comparable experience on this type of project.
s. 7(1)

Ruthanne
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October29152:54PM
To:PeterKlambauer;KatyAminian;RuthanneHenry;LoriEllis
Subject:ProposalEvaluationspreadsheet

Higuys,pleaseusethisifyoufindithelpful.Ifyouputyourtotalsintothespreadsheet"Totals"tab,itwillpopulatethe
printableevaluationsheetsforeachfirm.

Cheers,
N

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

107

PFR

110

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Ruthanne Henry
November-04-15 5:50 PM
Netami Stuart
FW: Proposal Evaluation spreadsheet
Rhenry Insert Proponent Evaluation Table November 5.xlsx

Hi Netami, I have left the evaluation form on your desk face down and modified my scores to be
consistent with the form from the RFP. I need to sign the conflict of interest form again as I have
misplaced my copy.
Ruthanne
From:RuthanneHenry
Sent:November04159:36AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:ProposalEvaluationspreadsheet

Hi Netami, here are my scores. I think Planning Partnership has strongest overall proposal, with
DTAH and Ramboll/Fotenn also very strong.
VFA, STLAi are solid but not quite with comparable experience on this type of project.
s. 7(1)

Ruthanne

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:October29152:54PM
To:PeterKlambauer;KatyAminian;RuthanneHenry;LoriEllis
Subject:ProposalEvaluationspreadsheet

Higuys,pleaseusethisifyoufindithelpful.Ifyouputyourtotalsintothespreadsheet"Totals"tab,itwillpopulatethe
printableevaluationsheetsforeachfirm.

Cheers,
N

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

108

PFR

111

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
November-05-15 3:16 PM
Ruthanne Henry; Katy Aminian; Lori Ellis; Peter Klambauer
Evaluation Forms
Proponent Evaluation Table_5nov2015.pdf; Proponent Evaluation Sheets_Katy.pdf;
Proponent Evaluation Sheets_Lori.pdf; Proponent Evaluation Sheets_Peter.pdf;
Proponent Evaluation Sheets_Ruthanne.pdf

Higuys,
Foryoureaseandcomfort,Ihaveinputthescoreswereviewedanddiscussedatourmeetingandonthetelephoneinto
handysheetsthatyoucansign,scanandsendbacktome.Pleaseseeattached.Also,pleaseseeacopyofthemaster
spreadsheetthatshowsourcalculations.Couldyoutakeaquicklooktocheckthatthenumbersonthesheetsyou're
signingmatchthenumbersonthemasterlist?Ifyounoticediscrepanciesorerrors,pleaseletmeknow!

IwillsubmittoPurchasingtomorrowafterdiscussingwithSusanKorrick.

Thanks,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

109

PFR

112

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
November-05-15 3:55 PM
Ruthanne Henry; Katy Aminian; Lori Ellis; Peter Klambauer
PLEASE USE THESE ONES! RE: Evaluation Forms
Proponent Evaluation Sheets_Katy.pdf; Proponent Evaluation Sheets_Lori.pdf;
Proponent Evaluation Sheets_Peter.pdf; Proponent Evaluation Sheets_Ruthanne.pdf;
Proponent Evaluation Table2_5nov2015.pdf

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November05153:16PM
To:RuthanneHenry;KatyAminian;LoriEllis;PeterKlambauer
Subject:EvaluationForms

Higuys,
Foryoureaseandcomfort,Ihaveinputthescoreswereviewedanddiscussedatourmeetingandonthetelephoneinto
handysheetsthatyoucansign,scanandsendbacktome.Pleaseseeattached.Also,pleaseseeacopyofthemaster
spreadsheetthatshowsourcalculations.Couldyoutakeaquicklooktocheckthatthenumbersonthesheetsyou're
signingmatchthenumbersonthemasterlist?Ifyounoticediscrepanciesorerrors,pleaseletmeknow!

IwillsubmittoPurchasingtomorrowafterdiscussingwithSusanKorrick.

Thanks,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

110

PFR

113

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
November-20-15 11:41 AM
Netami Stuart
Lori Ellis; Susan Korrick; Dave Nosella; Suzanne Bloomfield
9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today. Suzanne will
advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
PleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedinRFP911815
5046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

111

PFR

114

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
November-20-15 12:02 PM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
9118-15-5046_Proponent Evaluation Table.xlsx

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Icanprovideyouwithpdf'sof
theevaluators'signedscoresheets.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today. Suzanne will
advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
PleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedinRFP911815
5046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

112

PFR

115

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Suzanne Bloomfield
November-20-15 12:45 PM
Netami Stuart
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

Hi Netami,
The cost of services package is ready for pick up.
Suzanne
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:Friday,November20,201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today. Suzanne will
advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
PleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedinRFP911815
5046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

113

PFR

116

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
November-20-15 12:46 PM
Suzanne Bloomfield
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

HiSuzanne,
Whereisyouroffice?AtCityHall?Whatistheprocedureforopeningtheenvelopes?
Thanks,
netami

From:SuzanneBloomfield
Sent:November201512:45PM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hi Netami,
The cost of services package is ready for pick up.
Suzanne
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:Friday,November20,201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today. Suzanne will
advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
PleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedinRFP911815
5046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

114

PFR

117

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

115

PFR

118

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Suzanne Bloomfield
November-20-15 12:49 PM
Netami Stuart
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

Hi Netami,
I am at City Hall, 19th Floor, West Tower. I am not sure about the procedure on opening the
envelopes, you will have to speak with Mike V.
Suzanne
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:Friday,November20,201512:46PM
To:SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiSuzanne,
Whereisyouroffice?AtCityHall?Whatistheprocedureforopeningtheenvelopes?
Thanks,
netami

From:SuzanneBloomfield
Sent:November201512:45PM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hi Netami,
The cost of services package is ready for pick up.
Suzanne
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:Friday,November20,201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today. Suzanne will
advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

116

PFR

119

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
PleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedinRFP911815
5046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

117

PFR

120

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
November-20-15 2:15 PM
Netami Stuart
Suzanne Bloomfield
9118-15-5046 - Cost of Services envelope

Hello, Netami:
the envelopes have been opened and checked.
We keep the originals, you get the copies.
those copies are, as mentioned by Suzanne, ready for pick-up.
rgds . . . hmv

From:SuzanneBloomfield
Sent:November20,201512:49
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hi Netami,
I am at City Hall, 19th Floor, West Tower. I am not sure about the procedure on opening the
envelopes, you will have to speak with Mike V.
Suzanne
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:Friday,November20,201512:46PM
To:SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiSuzanne,
Whereisyouroffice?AtCityHall?Whatistheprocedureforopeningtheenvelopes?
Thanks,
netami

From:SuzanneBloomfield
Sent:November201512:45PM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hi Netami,
The cost of services package is ready for pick up.
Suzanne
118

PFR

121

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:Friday,November20,201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today. Suzanne
will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedin
RFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosureformsof
thefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

119

PFR

122

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
November-20-15 2:44 PM
Netami Stuart
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one where they rated
the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Icanprovideyouwith
pdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today. Suzanne
will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedin
RFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosureformsof
thefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

120

PFR

123

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

121

PFR

124

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
November-20-15 4:17 PM
Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
Evaluation Sheets_Katy.pdf; Evaluation Sheets_Netami.pdf; Evaluation Sheets_Peter.pdf;
Evaluation Sheets_Ruthanne.pdf; Humber Bay Park RFP Review -LEllis.pdf

HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescoredtheproponentsonthe
weightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).Thescoringwasdonewithregardtothe05scale.

BestRegards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one where they rated
the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Icanprovideyouwith
pdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today. Suzanne
will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

122

PFR

125

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedin
RFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosureformsof
thefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

123

PFR

126

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
November-23-15 7:50 AM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescoredtheproponentson
theweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).Thescoringwasdonewithregardtothe
05scale.

BestRegards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one where they
rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Icanprovide
youwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
124

PFR

127

Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today.
Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedin
RFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosure
formsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

125

PFR

128

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
November-23-15 4:32 PM
Mike Voelker
Lori Ellis; Susan Korrick
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,howeversomeofthescores
willbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleandgetbacktoyouwith
adjustedscores.

Pleaseadvise.

Thanks,
N

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescoredtheproponentson
theweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).Thescoringwasdonewithregardtothe
05scale.

BestRegards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Netami:
126

PFR

129

I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one where they
rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Icanprovide
youwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready today.
Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirmsevaluatedin
RFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsandthenondisclosure
formsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

127

PFR

130

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
November-24-15 7:08 AM
Netami Stuart
Lori Ellis; Susan Korrick
9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,howeversomeofthe
scoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleandgetbacktoyou
withadjustedscores.

Pleaseadvise.

Thanks,
N

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescoredthe
proponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).Thescoringwas
donewithregardtothe05scale.

128

PFR

131

BestRegards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one
where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Ican
provideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready
today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
129

PFR

132

ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

130

PFR

133

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
November-24-15 7:13 AM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

P.S.: Half-points are okay.


. . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,201507:08
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,however
someofthescoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleandgetback
toyouwithadjustedscores.

Pleaseadvise.

Thanks,
N

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
131

PFR

134

To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescored
theproponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).The
scoringwasdonewithregardtothe05scale.

BestRegards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the
one where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmore
raw,Icanprovideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should
be ready today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
132

PFR

135

Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthe
firmsevaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththe
resultsandthenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

133

PFR

136

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Lori Ellis
November-24-15 7:56 AM
Netami Stuart
Re: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

GoodMorning:)
IaninECCtoday.
Iwilldothescoresthisamandsendbeforenoon.

Lori
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,20154:08AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,howeversomeofthe
scoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleandgetbacktoyou
withadjustedscores.

Pleaseadvise.

Thanks,
N

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv
134

PFR

137


From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescoredthe
proponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).Thescoringwas
donewithregardtothe05scale.

BestRegards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Netami:

I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one
where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Ican
provideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready
today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
135

PFR

138


HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

136

PFR

139

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
November-24-15 9:29 AM
Lori Ellis
Re: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

Iamoutthismorningbutwouldliketodiscusswithyouverybrieflybeforeyouspendtime.

CanIcallyouonyourcell?Whatisthenumber?
N

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Lori Ellis
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 7:56 AM
To: Netami Stuart
Subject: Re: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

GoodMorning:)
IaninECCtoday.
Iwilldothescoresthisamandsendbeforenoon.

Lori
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,20154:08AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,howeversomeofthe
scoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleandgetbacktoyou
withadjustedscores.

Pleaseadvise.

137

PFR

140

Thanks,
N

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescoredthe
proponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).Thescoringwas
donewithregardtothe05scale.

BestRegards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Netami:

I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one
where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Ican
provideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults
138

PFR

141


Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready
today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

139

PFR

142

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Lori Ellis
November-24-15 9:37 AM
Netami Stuart
Re: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

4164205825

From: Netami Stuart


Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 09:29 AM
To: Lori Ellis
Subject: Re: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

Iamoutthismorningbutwouldliketodiscusswithyouverybrieflybeforeyouspendtime.

CanIcallyouonyourcell?Whatisthenumber?
N

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Lori Ellis
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 7:56 AM
To: Netami Stuart
Subject: Re: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

GoodMorning:)
IaninECCtoday.
Iwilldothescoresthisamandsendbeforenoon.

Lori
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,20154:08AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
140

PFR

143

a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,howeversomeofthe
scoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleandgetbacktoyou
withadjustedscores.

Pleaseadvise.

Thanks,
N

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescoredthe
proponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).Thescoringwas
donewithregardtothe05scale.

BestRegards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Netami:

I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one
where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Ican
provideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.

141

PFR

144

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready
today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

142

PFR

145

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Lori Ellis
November-24-15 12:39 PM
Netami Stuart
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

Can you call me re: evaluations P+T


Lori
LoriEllis
LandscapeArchitect|OALA,CSLA
SrProjectCoordinator|ParksDevelopment+CapitalProjects
P:416.394.2483

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November24159:29AM
To:LoriEllis
Subject:Re:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Iamoutthismorningbutwouldliketodiscusswithyouverybrieflybeforeyouspendtime.

CanIcallyouonyourcell?Whatisthenumber?
N

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Lori Ellis
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 7:56 AM
To: Netami Stuart
Subject: Re: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

GoodMorning:)
IaninECCtoday.
Iwilldothescoresthisamandsendbeforenoon.

Lori
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,20154:08AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv

143

PFR

146

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,howeversomeofthe
scoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleandgetbacktoyou
withadjustedscores.

Pleaseadvise.

Thanks,
N

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescoredthe
proponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).Thescoringwas
donewithregardtothe05scale.

BestRegards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Netami:

I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the one
where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv

144

PFR

147

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmoreraw,Ican
provideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should be ready
today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

145

PFR

148

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
November-25-15 9:54 AM
Mike Voelker
Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
9118-15-5046_Proponent Evaluation Table_rev1-5.xlsx

HelloMike,
Pleasefindattachedtheevaluationresultsthatreflect15scoringbyourevaluators.Ireviewedthescoringwiththe
evaluatorsandaskedthemtoconfirmtheirscoresona15scale.TheresultsattachedvaryslightlyfromtheoriginalsI
sentyou,sincethe15scaleallowslessprecisioninassigningvalue.Nevertheless,theoveralloutcomeremainsthe
same,withthesamethreeenvelopesopenedandthetopthreeproponentsinthesameorderofpointsawarded.

Ihopethisisacceptable.Pleaseletmeknowifyourequirefurtherinformation.Icanprovidesignedscoresheetsupon
request.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24157:13AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

P.S.: Half-points are okay.


. . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,201507:08
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,however
someofthescoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
146

PFR

149

b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleandgetback
toyouwithadjustedscores.

Pleaseadvise.

Thanks,
N

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommitteescored
theproponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawereweighted).The
scoringwasdonewithregardtothe05scale.

BestRegards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking for, the
one where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmore
raw,Icanprovideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.

Regards,
Netami

147

PFR

150

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should
be ready today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

148

PFR

151

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
November-25-15 10:04 AM
Netami Stuart
Lori Ellis
9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

Hello, Netami
Supplied spreadsheet will be fine.
And believe me, the "less precision" of the 1 -5 scale is actually a benefit in debriefs. How else are you going to justify a
score of, say, 43 vs. 44?
The pricing package is still waiting for you here.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November25,201509:54
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HelloMike,
Pleasefindattachedtheevaluationresultsthatreflect15scoringbyourevaluators.Ireviewedthescoring
withtheevaluatorsandaskedthemtoconfirmtheirscoresona15scale.Theresultsattachedvaryslightly
fromtheoriginalsIsentyou,sincethe15scaleallowslessprecisioninassigningvalue.Nevertheless,the
overalloutcomeremainsthesame,withthesamethreeenvelopesopenedandthetopthreeproponentsinthe
sameorderofpointsawarded.

Ihopethisisacceptable.Pleaseletmeknowifyourequirefurtherinformation.Icanprovidesignedscore
sheetsuponrequest.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24157:13AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

P.S.: Half-points are okay.


. . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,201507:08
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

149

PFR

152

Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,
howeversomeofthescoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleand
getbacktoyouwithadjustedscores.

Pleaseadvise.

Thanks,
N

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommittee
scoredtheproponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawere
weighted).Thescoringwasdonewithregardtothe05scale.

BestRegards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Netami:
150

PFR

153

I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking
for, the one where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomething
moreraw,Icanprovideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing
should be ready today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthe
firmsevaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththe
resultsandthenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

151

PFR

154

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
November-25-15 11:26 AM
Mike Voelker
Re: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

OkI'mhereonthe19th.Thanks!
Netami

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike Voelker
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:03 AM
To: Netami Stuart
Cc: Lori Ellis
Subject: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results
Hello, Netami

Supplied spreadsheet will be fine.


And believe me, the "less precision" of the 1 -5 scale is actually a benefit in debriefs. How else are you going to justify a
score of, say, 43 vs. 44?
The pricing package is still waiting for you here.

rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November25,201509:54
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HelloMike,
Pleasefindattachedtheevaluationresultsthatreflect15scoringbyourevaluators.Ireviewedthescoring
withtheevaluatorsandaskedthemtoconfirmtheirscoresona15scale.Theresultsattachedvaryslightly
fromtheoriginalsIsentyou,sincethe15scaleallowslessprecisioninassigningvalue.Nevertheless,the
overalloutcomeremainsthesame,withthesamethreeenvelopesopenedandthetopthreeproponentsinthe
sameorderofpointsawarded.

Ihopethisisacceptable.Pleaseletmeknowifyourequirefurtherinformation.Icanprovidesignedscore
sheetsuponrequest.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24157:13AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

152

PFR

155

P.S.: Half-points are okay.


. . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,201507:08
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,
howeversomeofthescoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleand
getbacktoyouwithadjustedscores.

Pleaseadvise.

Thanks,
N

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommittee
scoredtheproponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawere
weighted).Thescoringwasdonewithregardtothe05scale.

BestRegards,
153

PFR

156

Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Netami:

I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking
for, the one where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomething
moreraw,Icanprovideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing
should be ready today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthe
firmsevaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththe
resultsandthenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
154

PFR

157

Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

155

PFR

158

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
November-25-15 12:19 PM
Mike Voelker
Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results

Hello,
DanielMcLaughlinhanddeliveredthepricesthismorning.Iwillbebacktoyouwiththeresultstomorrow.

Thanks,
N

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November251510:04AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami
Supplied spreadsheet will be fine.
And believe me, the "less precision" of the 1 -5 scale is actually a benefit in debriefs. How else are you going to justify a
score of, say, 43 vs. 44?
The pricing package is still waiting for you here.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November25,201509:54
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HelloMike,
Pleasefindattachedtheevaluationresultsthatreflect15scoringbyourevaluators.Ireviewedthescoring
withtheevaluatorsandaskedthemtoconfirmtheirscoresona15scale.Theresultsattachedvaryslightly
fromtheoriginalsIsentyou,sincethe15scaleallowslessprecisioninassigningvalue.Nevertheless,the
overalloutcomeremainsthesame,withthesamethreeenvelopesopenedandthetopthreeproponentsinthe
sameorderofpointsawarded.

Ihopethisisacceptable.Pleaseletmeknowifyourequirefurtherinformation.Icanprovidesignedscore
sheetsuponrequest.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24157:13AM
156

PFR

159

To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

P.S.: Half-points are okay.


. . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,201507:08
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,
howeversomeofthescoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleand
getbacktoyouwithadjustedscores.

Pleaseadvise.

Thanks,
N

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,

157

PFR

160

Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommittee
scoredtheproponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawere
weighted).Thescoringwasdonewithregardtothe05scale.

BestRegards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking
for, the one where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmore
raw,Icanprovideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should
be ready today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
158

PFR

161


BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

159

PFR

162

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
November-26-15 2:30 PM
Mike Voelker
Susan Korrick; Dave Nosella; Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results including Prices
9118-15-5046_Humber Bay MP_LA Recommendation.pdf; 9118-15-5046_Proponent
Evaluation Table_prices.xlsx

DearMike,
Pleasefindattachedarecommendationletterforthisproject.Letmeknowifyouneedanythingelse.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November251510:04AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami
Supplied spreadsheet will be fine.
And believe me, the "less precision" of the 1 -5 scale is actually a benefit in debriefs. How else are you going to justify a
score of, say, 43 vs. 44?
The pricing package is still waiting for you here.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November25,201509:54
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HelloMike,
Pleasefindattachedtheevaluationresultsthatreflect15scoringbyourevaluators.Ireviewedthescoring
withtheevaluatorsandaskedthemtoconfirmtheirscoresona15scale.Theresultsattachedvaryslightly
fromtheoriginalsIsentyou,sincethe15scaleallowslessprecisioninassigningvalue.Nevertheless,the
overalloutcomeremainsthesame,withthesamethreeenvelopesopenedandthetopthreeproponentsinthe
sameorderofpointsawarded.

Ihopethisisacceptable.Pleaseletmeknowifyourequirefurtherinformation.Icanprovidesignedscore
sheetsuponrequest.

Regards,
Netami

160

PFR

163

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24157:13AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

P.S.: Half-points are okay.


. . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,201507:08
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,
howeversomeofthescoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleand
getbacktoyouwithadjustedscores.

Pleaseadvise.

Thanks,
N

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
161

PFR

164

Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommittee
scoredtheproponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawere
weighted).Thescoringwasdonewithregardtothe05scale.

BestRegards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking
for, the one where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmore
raw,Icanprovideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should
be ready today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.
162

PFR

165


BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

163

PFR

166

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Susan Korrick
November-26-15 4:22 PM
Netami Stuart
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Proposal Evaluation Results including Prices

Thanks Netami
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November26152:30PM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResultsincludingPrices

DearMike,
Pleasefindattachedarecommendationletterforthisproject.Letmeknowifyouneedanythingelse.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November251510:04AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami
Supplied spreadsheet will be fine.
And believe me, the "less precision" of the 1 -5 scale is actually a benefit in debriefs. How else are you going to justify a
score of, say, 43 vs. 44?
The pricing package is still waiting for you here.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November25,201509:54
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HelloMike,
Pleasefindattachedtheevaluationresultsthatreflect15scoringbyourevaluators.Ireviewedthescoring
withtheevaluatorsandaskedthemtoconfirmtheirscoresona15scale.Theresultsattachedvaryslightly
fromtheoriginalsIsentyou,sincethe15scaleallowslessprecisioninassigningvalue.Nevertheless,the
overalloutcomeremainsthesame,withthesamethreeenvelopesopenedandthetopthreeproponentsinthe
sameorderofpointsawarded.

164

PFR

167

Ihopethisisacceptable.Pleaseletmeknowifyourequirefurtherinformation.Icanprovidesignedscore
sheetsuponrequest.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24157:13AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

P.S.: Half-points are okay.


. . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November24,201507:08
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Please score them out of five, as per the scale in the RFP.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November23,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Mike,wedidnotscorethemoutoffive,butoutofthepointsavailableforeachcriterion.Ican:
a)calculatea1/5scoreusingourexistingnumbersandprovideyouwiththatinformation,
howeversomeofthescoreswillbenumberslike3.67and3.42
OR
b)reviewwiththecommitteeandhavethemreviewtheirscoresconsideringthe15scaleand
getbacktoyouwithadjustedscores.

Pleaseadvise.

Thanks,
N

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November23157:50AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
I don't see the score out of five, I see only the weighted score on the sheets you've provided.
Could you please provide that out-of-five scores?
tks! . . . hmv
165

PFR

168

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201516:17
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

HiMike,
Attached,youwillfindtheevaluators'signedscoresheets.Ourevaluationcommittee
scoredtheproponentsontheweightedscale(outof5,10or15,asthecriteriawere
weighted).Thescoringwasdonewithregardtothe05scale.

BestRegards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November20152:44PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Netami:
I have the spreadsheet, and yes, it's the evaluators' signed scoresheets that I am looking
for, the one where they rated the submissions on the 0 5 scale.
rgds . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November20,201512:02
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:RE:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Attached,aspreadsheetwithalltheevaluators'scores.Ifyouneedsomethingmore
raw,Icanprovideyouwithpdf'softheevaluators'signedscoresheets.

Regards,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:November201511:41AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella;SuzanneBloomfield
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

Hello, Netami:
Apologies in the delay in getting back to you, the package containing the pricing should
be ready today. Suzanne will advise.
Could you please provide me with the raw scores for the proponents?
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:November9,201513:28
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:LoriEllis;SusanKorrick;DaveNosella
Subject:9118155046ProposalEvaluationResults

166

PFR

169

HiMike,
Pleasefindattachedarequesttoopenthesecondenvelopeofthreeofthefirms
evaluatedinRFP9118155046.Attached,also,isaspreadsheetwiththeresultsand
thenondisclosureformsofthefive(5)evaluators.

Pleaseletmeknowifyouhavequestionsorcomments.

BestRegards,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

167

PFR

170

s. 12

168

PFR

171

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
December-15-15 4:32 PM
Mike Voelker
Peter Klambauer
9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

169

PFR

172

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
December-16-15 7:13 AM
Netami Stuart
Peter Klambauer
9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen of it, you are
missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

170

PFR

173

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Peter Klambauer
December-16-15 7:36 AM
Mike Voelker; Netami Stuart
Re: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike Voelker
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 7:12 AM
To: Netami Stuart
Cc: Peter Klambauer
Subject: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen of it, you are
missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

171

PFR

174

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
December-16-15 7:38 AM
Peter Klambauer; Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen of it,
you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter today or tomorrow.
. . . hmv

172

PFR

175

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

173

PFR

176

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Peter Klambauer
December-16-15 8:50 AM
Mike Voelker; Netami Stuart
Dave Nosella
Re: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwasmeantfor
Pavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike Voelker
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 7:37 AM
To: Peter Klambauer; Netami Stuart
Subject: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
174

PFR

177

PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen of it,
you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter today or tomorrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

175

PFR

178

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Dave Nosella
December-16-15 8:58 AM
Peter Klambauer; Mike Voelker; Netami Stuart
RE: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I was thinking of
the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I understand can proceed to BC while
the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwasmeantfor
Pavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike Voelker
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 7:37 AM
To: Peter Klambauer; Netami Stuart
Subject: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
176

PFR

179

16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen of it,
you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter today or tomorrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

177

PFR

180

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
December-16-15 9:51 AM
Dave Nosella; Peter Klambauer; Mike Voelker
RE: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
15-5046_Humber Bay MP_LA Recommendation_16dec2015.pdf

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!

Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I was thinking of
the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I understand can proceed to BC while
the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwasmeantfor
Pavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike Voelker
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 7:37 AM
To: Peter Klambauer; Netami Stuart
Subject: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

178

PFR

181

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen of it,
you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter today or tomorrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

179

PFR

182

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

180

PFR

183

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
December-16-15 2:47 PM
Netami Stuart; Dave Nosella; Peter Klambauer
9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!

Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I was
thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I understand can
proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwas
meantforPavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
181

PFR

184

From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
182

PFR

185


Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen
of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter
today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

183

PFR

186

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
December-16-15 4:00 PM
Dave Nosella; Peter Klambauer
RE: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

Canyouguyshelpmeouthere?DoyouhaveaformthatIshouldfilloutretroactivelybycallingreferencesforDTAH?

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16152:47PM
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!

Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I was
thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I understand can
proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
184

PFR

187

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwas
meantforPavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
185

PFR

188

Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen
of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter
today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

186

PFR

189

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Peter Klambauer
December-16-15 4:38 PM
Netami Stuart
Fw: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

..requisitionmeanspreq..

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike Voelker <mvoelke@toronto.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 2:46 PM
To: Netami Stuart; Dave Nosella; Peter Klambauer
Subject: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.

And a requisition.

tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!

Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I was
thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I understand can
proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.

DN

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
187

PFR

190

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwas
meantforPavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
188

PFR

191

Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen
of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter
today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

189

PFR

192

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Peter Klambauer
December-17-15 9:19 AM
Netami Stuart
RE: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

Did you contact references, was that part of measurable evaluation? If so send him a record, if not
tell him so.
PeterKlambauer,B.ArchDPA
SeniorProjectCoordinator
PFRPDCP
EtobicokeCivicCentre
399TheWestMall
MainFloor,NorthBlock
Toronto,ONM9C2Y2
Tel:4163956676
Fax:4163948935
Email:pklamba@toronto.ca
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16154:00PM
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Canyouguyshelpmeouthere?DoyouhaveaformthatIshouldfilloutretroactivelybycallingreferencesforDTAH?

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16152:47PM
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
190

PFR

193


Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I was
thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I understand can
proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwas
meantforPavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
191

PFR

194

To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen
of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter
today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
192

PFR

195

Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

193

PFR

196

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
December-17-15 10:11 AM
Peter Klambauer
RE: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

Ididnotcontactanyreferences.TheRFPstatedthattheCityMAYcontactthembutnotthatwewould.

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December17159:19AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Did you contact references, was that part of measurable evaluation? If so send him a record, if not
tell him so.
PeterKlambauer,B.ArchDPA
SeniorProjectCoordinator
PFRPDCP
EtobicokeCivicCentre
399TheWestMall
MainFloor,NorthBlock
Toronto,ONM9C2Y2
Tel:4163956676
Fax:4163948935
Email:pklamba@toronto.ca
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16154:00PM
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Canyouguyshelpmeouthere?DoyouhaveaformthatIshouldfilloutretroactivelybycallingreferencesforDTAH?

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16152:47PM
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
194

PFR

197

tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!

Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I was
thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I understand can
proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwas
meantforPavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP 195

PFR

198

timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen
of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter
today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

196

PFR

199

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

197

PFR

200

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Peter Klambauer
December-18-15 10:32 AM
Netami Stuart
RE: 9118-15-5046 Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

More to this apparently, pls call me thx


PeterKlambauer,B.ArchDPA
SeniorProjectCoordinator
PFRPDCP
EtobicokeCivicCentre
399TheWestMall
MainFloor,NorthBlock
Toronto,ONM9C2Y2
Tel:4163956676
Fax:4163948935
Email:pklamba@toronto.ca
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December17159:19AM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Did you contact references, was that part of measurable evaluation? If so send him a record, if not
tell him so.
PeterKlambauer,B.ArchDPA
SeniorProjectCoordinator
PFRPDCP
EtobicokeCivicCentre
399TheWestMall
MainFloor,NorthBlock
Toronto,ONM9C2Y2
Tel:4163956676
Fax:4163948935
Email:pklamba@toronto.ca
From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16154:00PM
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Canyouguyshelpmeouthere?DoyouhaveaformthatIshouldfilloutretroactivelybycallingreferencesforDTAH?

198

PFR

201

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16152:47PM
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!

Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I was
thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I understand can
proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestionwas
meantforPavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
199

PFR

202

16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what I've seen
of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will also be
necessary.
200

PFR

203

Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation letter
today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

201

PFR

204

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
December-18-15 11:25 AM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046_references.docx

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

202

PFR

205

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
December-18-15 11:25 AM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046_references.docx

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

203

PFR

206

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
December-29-15 10:00 AM
Netami Stuart
Dave Nosella; Peter Klambauer
9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

Good Morning, Netami:


Approvals for the most part are in place.
the req is blocked;
Still waiting on the reference checks from you.
also, since the value is over 100k,. could you get confirmation from legal about the requirement of a contract?
tks! . . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!

Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I
was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I
understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
204

PFR

207

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestion
wasmeantforPavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December

205

PFR

208

16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what
I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to
require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will
also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation
letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthis
project?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

206

PFR

209

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Dave Nosella
January-03-16 11:16 AM
Kristine Yuen
Peter Klambauer; Netami Stuart; Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

Kristene:
Please arrange to unblock this requisition.
Thanks,
DN
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Good Morning, Netami:


Approvals for the most part are in place.
the req is blocked;
Still waiting on the reference checks from you.
also, since the value is over 100k,. could you get confirmation from legal about the requirement of a contract?
tks! . . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!
207

PFR

210


Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I
was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I
understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestion
wasmeantforPavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
208

PFR

211

To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what
I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to
require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will
also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation
letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthis
project?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

209

PFR

212

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

210

PFR

213

s. 12

211

PFR

214

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Jasmine Stein
January-04-16 10:41 AM
Netami Stuart
Automatic reply: RFP 9118-15-5046 Legal agreement required?

will respond to your message asap upon my return.

s. 14(1)

If you urgently require a response before this time please contact my assistant Oi Lan at 416 -338-5810

Thank you,
Jasmine

212

PFR

215

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
January-04-16 10:41 AM
Netami Stuart
Automatic reply: RFP 9118-15-5046 Legal agreement required?
s. 14(1)

Thanks for your message.

with no access to e-mail. If you require

immediate assistance on an urgent matter, please contact


Bob Nichols rnichol3@toronto.ca
If a manager's assistance is required, please contact
Joanne Kehoe - jkehoe@toronto.ca
Else, I will respond to your e-mail upon my return.
With regards . . . .Mike Voelker

213

PFR

216

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
January-04-16 12:42 PM
Mike Voelker
Dave Nosella; Peter Klambauer
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
9118-15-5046_references.docx

HiagainMike,andhappyNewYear!
IhavereturnedoriginalsoftheCostofServicestoSuzanneasrequested(yousentmebothcopiessuppliedby
vendors).AttachedistherecordofhowIcontactedreferences.Ihopeitwilldo.Thereisnoformforcontacting
referencesforRFPsthatIwasabletofind.Therewerenoquestions,criteria,orscoringforreferencesmentioned
anywhereintheRFP.TheRFPstatesthattheCityofTorontomaycontactthereferencesinForm7.

Thanks,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Good Morning, Netami:


Approvals for the most part are in place.
the req is blocked;
Still waiting on the reference checks from you.
also, since the value is over 100k,. could you get confirmation from legal about the requirement of a contract?
tks! . . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

214

PFR

217

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!

Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I
was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I
understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestion
wasmeantforPavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

215

PFR

218

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what
I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to
require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will
also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation
letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthis
project?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

216

PFR

219

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

217

PFR

220

s. 12

218

PFR

221

s. 12

219

PFR

222

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Kristine Yuen
January-05-16 8:51 AM
Dave Nosella
Peter Klambauer; Netami Stuart; Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

What is the req. no.


From:DaveNosella
Sent:January031611:16AM
To:KristineYuen
Cc:PeterKlambauer;NetamiStuart;LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Kristene:
Please arrange to unblock this requisition.
Thanks,
DN
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Good Morning, Netami:


Approvals for the most part are in place.
the req is blocked;
Still waiting on the reference checks from you.
also, since the value is over 100k,. could you get confirmation from legal about the requirement of a contract?
tks! . . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
220

PFR

223

tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!

Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I
was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I
understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestion
wasmeantforPavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
221

PFR

224

PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what
I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to
require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will
also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation
letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

222

PFR

225

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthis
project?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

223

PFR

226

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Lori Ellis
January-05-16 9:08 AM
Kristine Yuen
Netami Stuart; Peter Klambauer; Dave Nosella
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
HPPark-PRequisition.pdf

Kristine,
For Humber Bay Park Revitalization: 9118-15-5046
Purchase Requisition No# EA 57487
SAP: 1166047
Project ID: 5119

Thanks,
Lori
From:KristineYuen
Sent:January05168:51AM
To:DaveNosella
Cc:PeterKlambauer;NetamiStuart;LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

What is the req. no.


From:DaveNosella
Sent:January031611:16AM
To:KristineYuen
Cc:PeterKlambauer;NetamiStuart;LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Kristene:
Please arrange to unblock this requisition.
Thanks,
DN
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Good Morning, Netami:


Approvals for the most part are in place.
224

PFR

227

the req is blocked;


Still waiting on the reference checks from you.
also, since the value is over 100k,. could you get confirmation from legal about the requirement of a contract?
tks! . . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!

Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I
was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I
understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestion
wasmeantforPavilion.

225

PFR

228

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for

226

PFR

229

PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what
I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to
require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will
also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation
letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthis
project?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

227

PFR

230

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Kristine Yuen
January-05-16 9:45 AM
Dave Nosella; Gord Mcnally
Peter Klambauer; Netami Stuart; Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

Gord
Please release req. 1166047
Tks
Kris
From:DaveNosella
Sent:January031611:16AM
To:KristineYuen
Cc:PeterKlambauer;NetamiStuart;LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Kristene:
Please arrange to unblock this requisition.
Thanks,
DN
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Good Morning, Netami:


Approvals for the most part are in place.
the req is blocked;
Still waiting on the reference checks from you.
also, since the value is over 100k,. could you get confirmation from legal about the requirement of a contract?
tks! . . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

228

PFR

231

Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!

Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I
was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I
understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestion
wasmeantforPavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
229

PFR

232

Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what
I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to
require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will
also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation
letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

230

PFR

233

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthis
project?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

231

PFR

234

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Gord Mcnally
January-05-16 9:53 AM
Kristine Yuen; Dave Nosella
Peter Klambauer; Netami Stuart; Lori Ellis
RE: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?

Done
From:KristineYuen
Sent:January05169:45AM
To:DaveNosella;GordMcnally
Cc:PeterKlambauer;NetamiStuart;LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Gord
Please release req. 1166047
Tks
Kris
From:DaveNosella
Sent:January031611:16AM
To:KristineYuen
Cc:PeterKlambauer;NetamiStuart;LoriEllis
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Kristene:
Please arrange to unblock this requisition.
Thanks,
DN
From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Good Morning, Netami:


Approvals for the most part are in place.
the req is blocked;
Still waiting on the reference checks from you.
also, since the value is over 100k,. could you get confirmation from legal about the requirement of a contract?
tks! . . . hmv

232

PFR

235

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!

Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I
was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I
understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestion
wasmeantforPavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
233

PFR

236

December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what
I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to
require a rewrite.
234

PFR

237

I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will
also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation
letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthis
project?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

235

PFR

238

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
January-06-16 10:53 AM
Netami Stuart
Dave Nosella; Peter Klambauer
9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP - References

Hello, Netami:
the form for references looks good.
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:January4,201612:42
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPReferences

HiagainMike,andhappyNewYear!
IhavereturnedoriginalsoftheCostofServicestoSuzanneasrequested(yousentmebothcopiessuppliedby
vendors).AttachedistherecordofhowIcontactedreferences.Ihopeitwilldo.Thereisnoformfor
contactingreferencesforRFPsthatIwasabletofind.Therewerenoquestions,criteria,orscoringfor
referencesmentionedanywhereintheRFP.TheRFPstatesthattheCityofTorontomaycontactthereferences
inForm7.

Thanks,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Good Morning, Netami:


Approvals for the most part are in place.
the req is blocked;
Still waiting on the reference checks from you.
also, since the value is over 100k,. could you get confirmation from legal about the requirement of a contract?
tks! . . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
236

PFR

239

Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.


And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!

Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific
but I was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval,
which I understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthe
questionwasmeantforPavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
237

PFR

240

Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his
word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but
from what I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the
recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee
report will also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your
recommendation letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

238

PFR

241

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedfor
thisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthe
timelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

239

PFR

242


s. 12

240

PFR

243

s. 12

241

PFR

244


s. 12
242

PFR

245

s. 12

243

PFR

246

244

s. 12

PFR

247

s. 12

245

PFR

248

s. 12

246

PFR

249

s. 12

247

PFR

250

s. 12

248

PFR

251

s. 12

249

PFR

252

250

s. 12

PFR

253

s. 12

251

PFR

254

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Netami Stuart
January-13-16 10:29 AM
Suzanne Bloomfield
Humber Bay Master Plan 9118-15-5046

HiSuzanne,
Couldyoupleasesendmeascanand/orcopyofthecostofservicesprovidedbyDTAHforthiscall.Iseemtohavesent
youbacktheonlyoneIhadandIneedtoprovidelegalwithacopy.

Thanks,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

252

PFR

255

253

s. 12

PFR

256


s. 12

254

PFR

257

s. 12

255

PFR

258

s. 12

256

PFR

259

s. 12

257

PFR

260

s. 12

258

PFR

261

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
January-14-16 4:34 PM
Mike Voelker
Fw: RFP 9118-15-5046 Legal agreement required?
Humber Bay Master Plan-LeA.doc

Pleaseletmeknowwhattodonow.Ineedtohiretheseguysverysoon.

Thanks,
N

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.

259

s. 12

PFR

262


s. 12

260

PFR

263

s. 12

261

PFR

264

s. 12

262

PFR

265

s. 12

263

PFR

266

264

s. 12

PFR

267

s. 12

265

PFR

268

266

s. 12

PFR

269

267

s. 12

PFR

270

s. 12

268

PFR

271

s. 12

269

PFR

272


s. 12

270

PFR

273

271

s. 12

PFR

274

272

s. 12

PFR

275

s. 12

273

PFR

276

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
January-19-16 11:01 AM
'James Roche'
Humber Bay Parks Master Plan - Legal Agreement Draft
Humber Bay Master Plan-LeA_draft.doc

HiJames,
AttachedisadraftofalegaldocumentthatwillberequiredforDTAHtosignbeforewecanissueaPO.Thedocument
isforyourreviewandcommentandissubjecttofurtherreviewandrevisionbytheCity'slegaldepartment.

Pleaseprovideyourquestions/commentsandwewilltrytogetitfinalizedandsignedASAP.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

274

PFR

277

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

James Roche <jroche@dtah.com>


January-22-16 3:47 PM
Netami Stuart
FW: Humber Bay Parks Master Plan - Legal Agreement Draft
Humber Bay Master Plan-LeA_draft.doc

HiNetami

NocommentsexcepttoaddsecondsignaturelineforDTAH.
Weusuallygettwopartnerstosign.

Regards

James

From: Netami Stuart [mailto:nstuart@toronto.ca]


Sent: January 19, 2016 11:01 AM
To: James Roche
Subject: Humber Bay Parks Master Plan - Legal Agreement Draft

HiJames,
AttachedisadraftofalegaldocumentthatwillberequiredforDTAHtosignbeforewecanissueaPO.Thedocument
isforyourreviewandcommentandissubjecttofurtherreviewandrevisionbytheCity'slegaldepartment.

Pleaseprovideyourquestions/commentsandwewilltrytogetitfinalizedandsignedASAP.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

275

PFR

278

s. 7(1)

From: Netami Stuart [mailto:nstuart@toronto.ca]


Sent: January 19, 2016 11:01 AM
To: James Roche
Subject: Humber Bay Parks Master Plan - Legal Agreement Draft

HiJames,
AttachedisadraftofalegaldocumentthatwillberequiredforDTAHtosignbeforewecanissueaPO.Thedocument
isforyourreviewandcommentandissubjecttofurtherreviewandrevisionbytheCity'slegaldepartment.

Pleaseprovideyourquestions/commentsandwewilltrytogetitfinalizedandsignedASAP.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327
276

PFR

279

277

PFR

280


From:JamesRoche[mailto:jroche@dtah.com]
Sent:January22163:47PM
To:NetamiStuart
Subject:FW:HumberBayParksMasterPlanLegalAgreementDraft

HiNetami

NocommentsexcepttoaddsecondsignaturelineforDTAH.
Weusuallygettwopartnerstosign.

278

PFR

s. 12

281

Regards

James

From: Netami Stuart [mailto:nstuart@toronto.ca]


Sent: January 19, 2016 11:01 AM
To: James Roche
Subject: Humber Bay Parks Master Plan - Legal Agreement Draft

HiJames,
AttachedisadraftofalegaldocumentthatwillberequiredforDTAHtosignbeforewecanissueaPO.Thedocument
isforyourreviewandcommentandissubjecttofurtherreviewandrevisionbytheCity'slegaldepartment.

Pleaseprovideyourquestions/commentsandwewilltrytogetitfinalizedandsignedASAP.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

279

PFR

282

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
January-26-16 10:51 AM
Netami Stuart
Dave Nosella; Peter Klambauer
9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -defence checks pending

Hello, Netami:
I checked my e-mail and still cannot find any record of having received your Reference Check doc. Please advise soonest
rgds. . . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December29,201510:00
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Good Morning, Netami:


Approvals for the most part are in place.
the req is blocked;
Still waiting on the reference checks from you.
also, since the value is over 100k,. could you get confirmation from legal about the requirement of a contract?
tks! . . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!

Netami

280

PFR

283

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific
but I was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval,
which I understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthe
questionwasmeantforPavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his
word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
281

PFR

284

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but
from what I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the
recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee
report will also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your
recommendation letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedfor
thisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthe
timelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
282

PFR

285

ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

283

PFR

286

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:

Netami Stuart
January-26-16 10:54 AM
Mike Voelker
FW: 9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP -timeline for PO issuance?
9118-15-5046_references.docx

Hereyougo.

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:January041612:42PM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiagainMike,andhappyNewYear!
IhavereturnedoriginalsoftheCostofServicestoSuzanneasrequested(yousentmebothcopiessuppliedby
vendors).AttachedistherecordofhowIcontactedreferences.Ihopeitwilldo.Thereisnoformforcontacting
referencesforRFPsthatIwasabletofind.Therewerenoquestions,criteria,orscoringforreferencesmentioned
anywhereintheRFP.TheRFPstatesthattheCityofTorontomaycontactthereferencesinForm7.

Thanks,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Good Morning, Netami:


Approvals for the most part are in place.
the req is blocked;
Still waiting on the reference checks from you.
also, since the value is over 100k,. could you get confirmation from legal about the requirement of a contract?
tks! . . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
284

PFR

287

tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!

Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific but I
was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval, which I
understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthequestion
wasmeantforPavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP 285

PFR

288

timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but from what
I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the recommendation letter is going to
require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee report will
also be necessary.
Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your recommendation
letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?
286

PFR

289


HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedforthis
project?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthetimelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

287

PFR

290

Netami Stuart
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Mike Voelker
January-26-16 11:12 AM
Netami Stuart
9118-15-5046 - Humber Bay Parks MP - References

tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:January26,201610:54
To:MikeVoelker
Subject:FW:9118155046HumberBayParksMPReferences

Hereyougo.

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:January041612:42PM
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiagainMike,andhappyNewYear!
IhavereturnedoriginalsoftheCostofServicestoSuzanneasrequested(yousentmebothcopiessuppliedby
vendors).AttachedistherecordofhowIcontactedreferences.Ihopeitwilldo.Thereisnoformfor
contactingreferencesforRFPsthatIwasabletofind.Therewerenoquestions,criteria,orscoringfor
referencesmentionedanywhereintheRFP.TheRFPstatesthattheCityofTorontomaycontactthereferences
inForm7.

Thanks,
Netami

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December291510:00AM
To:NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Good Morning, Netami:


Approvals for the most part are in place.
the req is blocked;
Still waiting on the reference checks from you.
also, since the value is over 100k,. could you get confirmation from legal about the requirement of a contract?
tks! . . . hmv

From:MikeVoelker
Sent:December16,201514:47
288

PFR

291

To:NetamiStuart;DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Hello, Netami:
I will proceed with approvals of the recommended proponent, but I still one more thing from you:
Daniel told me about a form that you folks use to keep a record of various references you contact.
Because of recent events, I would like a completed copy of that form.
And a requisition.
tks! . . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December16,201509:51
To:DaveNosella;PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Andhereisanimprovedrecommendationletterformuchlessthan$500K.
Sorry,itwasmyfirsteverrecommendationletter.I'mappreciatingallyourhelpasIlearn!

Netami

From:DaveNosella
Sent:December16158:58AM
To:PeterKlambauer;MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:RE:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

As usual yes there may be some confusion, my voicemail was not that specific
but I was thinking of the pavilion with reference to Bid Committee approval,
which I understand can proceed to BC while the legal agreement is sorted out.
DN
From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16158:50AM
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Cc:DaveNosella
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Theremaybesomeconfusion.Pavilionisover$500,MasterPlanisunder.Ithinkthe
questionwasmeantforPavilion.

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:37 AM
289

PFR

292

To: Peter
Klambauer;
Netami
Stuart
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?
The recommendation letter did not state how much the award was for, so I took Dave at his
word.
. . . hmv

From:PeterKlambauer
Sent:December16,201507:36
To:MikeVoelker;NetamiStuart
Subject:Re:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

Iftheawardislessthan$500kwhythebidcttee?

SentfrommyBlackBerry10smartphoneontheTELUSnetwork.
From: Mike
Voelker
Sent:
Wednesday,
December
16, 2015
7:12 AM
To: Netami
Stuart
Cc: Peter
Klambauer
Subject:
9118-155046
Humber
Bay Parks
MP timeline for
PO
issuance?

Hello, Netami:
I have not had an opportunity to do a thorough review of your recommendation, but
from what I've seen of it, you are missing the value of the award, so the
recommendation letter is going to require a rewrite.
I also received a call from Dave this morning, and he's indicated that a bid committee
report will also be necessary.
290

PFR

293

Apologies, I can't give you a timeline at this point, but I want to review your
recommendation letter today or to-morrow.
. . . hmv

From:NetamiStuart
Sent:December15,201516:32
To:MikeVoelker
Cc:PeterKlambauer
Subject:9118155046HumberBayParksMPtimelineforPOissuance?

HiMike,

WouldyoubeabletoprovidemewithanideaofwhenaPOmaybeissuedfor
thisproject?
IammeetingwiththecouncilloronThursdayandwouldliketoexplainthe
timelines.

Allthebest,

NetamiStuartOALA
ProjectCoordinatorLandscapeArchitect
Parks,Forestry&Recreation
MetroHall,55JohnStreet,24thfloor,Toronto,ONM5V3C6

nstuart@toronto.ca
4163383327

291

PFR

294

RFP: 9118-15-5046
Location: Humber Bay Park
Detailed Evaluation Scoring Results
Proponent

Evaluators
Netami

Katy

Ruthanne

Peter

Average
(1-5)

Lori

Weighted

DTAH
1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

Proponent Profile & Experience

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

10.0 pts

4.50

9.00

4.50

9.00

4.50

9.00

4.50

9.00

4.50

9.00

4.50

9.00

1.20

5.0 pts

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.50

4.50

4.00

4.00

4.25

4.25

4.15

4.15

1.30

5.0 pts

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.25

4.25

4.05

4.05

1.40

5.0pts

5.00

5.00

4.00

4.00

4.50

4.50

4.00

4.00

4.25

4.25

4.35

4.35

Project Team Experience


2.10

5.0 pts

5.00

5.00

4.50

4.50

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.50

4.50

4.40

4.40

2.20

5.0 pts

5.00

5.00

4.00

4.00

4.50

4.50

4.00

4.00

4.50

4.50

4.40

4.40

3.10

10.0 pts

4.50

9.00

4.00

8.00

4.50

9.00

4.00

8.00

4.50

9.00

4.30

8.60

3.20

10.0 pts

4.50

9.00

4.00

8.00

4.50

9.00

4.00

8.00

4.50

9.00

4.30

8.60

3.30

2.5 pts

3.00

1.50

3.00

1.50

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

4.50

2.25

3.70

1.85

3.40

2.5 pts

3.00

1.50

3.00

1.50

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

2.50

1.25

3.30

1.65

3.50

10.50

4.00

12.00

3.50

10.50

4.00

12.00

3.50

10.50

3.70

11.10

Project Understanding

Work Plan & Deliverables


4.10

5.00

SCORE WEIGHTED

1.10

15.0 pts

Cost of Services
5.10

max 25 pts

Total Score

25.00

63.50

60.50

63.00

PFR

61.00

62.75

87.15

295

Proponent

Evaluators
Netami

Katy

Ruthanne

Peter

Average
(1-5)

Lori

Weighted

FOTENN Consultants Inc.


1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

Proponent Profile & Experience

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

1.10

10.0 pts

4.50

9.00

4.50

9.00

4.50

9.00

4.00

8.00

4.00

8.00

4.30

8.60

1.20

5.0 pts

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

1.30

5.0 pts

3.50

3.50

3.50

3.50

3.50

3.50

3.00

3.00

4.00

4.00

3.50

3.50

1.40

5.0pts

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.50

3.50

3.00

3.00

4.00

4.00

3.30

3.30

Project Team Experience


2.10

5.0 pts

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.50

3.50

3.00

3.00

4.00

4.00

3.30

3.30

2.20

5.0 pts

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

3.60

3.60

3.10

10.0 pts

3.50

7.00

3.50

7.00

3.50

7.00

2.50

5.00

3.00

6.00

3.20

6.40

3.20

10.0 pts

4.50

9.00

4.50

9.00

4.00

8.00

4.00

8.00

4.00

8.00

4.20

8.40

3.30

2.5 pts

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

3.50

1.75

3.90

1.95

3.40

2.5 pts

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

3.50

1.75

3.90

1.95

3.50

10.50

3.50

10.50

3.50

10.50

3.50

10.50

3.50

10.50

3.50

10.50

Project Understanding

Work Plan & Deliverables


4.10

5.00

SCORE WEIGHTED

15.0 pts

Cost of Services
5.10

max 25 pts

Total Score

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

56.00

56.00

57.00

52.50

56.00

PFR

55.50

296

Proponent

Evaluators
Netami

Katy

Ruthanne

Peter

Average
(1-5)

Lori

Weighted

GH3 Inc.
1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

Proponent Profile & Experience

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

1.10

10.0 pts

4.50

9.00

4.50

9.00

4.50

9.00

4.00

8.00

4.50

9.00

4.40

8.80

1.20

5.0 pts

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.50

4.50

4.10

4.10

1.30

5.0 pts

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

2.50

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

2.70

2.70

1.40

5.0pts

2.50

2.50

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

2.90

2.90

Project Team Experience


2.10

5.0 pts

3.50

3.50

4.50

4.50

3.50

3.50

3.00

3.00

4.00

4.00

3.70

3.70

2.20

5.0 pts

3.00

3.00

4.50

4.50

3.50

3.50

3.00

3.00

4.00

4.00

3.60

3.60

3.10

10.0 pts

4.50

9.00

4.00

8.00

4.00

8.00

4.00

8.00

4.00

8.00

4.10

8.20

3.20

10.0 pts

4.50

9.00

4.00

8.00

4.00

8.00

4.00

8.00

4.00

8.00

4.10

8.20

3.30

2.5 pts

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

3.40

2.5 pts

4.00

2.00

3.50

1.75

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

3.90

1.95

4.00

12.00

3.50

10.50

4.00

12.00

4.00

12.00

3.50

10.50

3.80

11.40

Project Understanding

Work Plan & Deliverables


4.10

5.00

SCORE WEIGHTED

15.0 pts

Cost of Services
5.10

max 25 pts

Total Score

22.92

58.50

57.75

57.50

PFR

56.00

58.00

80.47

297

Proponent

Evaluators
Netami

Katy

Ruthanne

Peter

Average
(1-5)

Lori

Weighted

Scott Torrance Landscape Architest Inc.


1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

Proponent Profile & Experience

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

1.10

10.0 pts

3.50

7.00

2.50

5.00

3.50

7.00

2.50

5.00

3.50

7.00

3.10

6.20

1.20

5.0 pts

3.00

3.00

2.50

2.50

3.00

3.00

2.00

2.00

3.00

3.00

2.70

2.70

1.30

5.0 pts

3.00

3.00

4.50

4.50

4.00

4.00

3.00

3.00

4.00

4.00

3.70

3.70

1.40

5.0pts

3.00

3.00

3.50

3.50

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

4.00

4.00

3.30

3.30

Project Team Experience


2.10

5.0 pts

3.50

3.50

3.50

3.50

3.50

3.50

4.00

4.00

3.50

3.50

3.60

3.60

2.20

5.0 pts

3.50

3.50

4.50

4.50

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

3.50

3.50

3.90

3.90

3.10

10.0 pts

4.00

8.00

3.50

7.00

3.50

7.00

4.00

8.00

3.50

7.00

3.70

7.40

3.20

10.0 pts

4.00

8.00

3.50

7.00

3.50

7.00

4.00

8.00

3.50

7.00

3.70

7.40

3.30

2.5 pts

0.00

0.00

3.00

1.50

3.00

1.50

4.00

2.00

2.50

1.25

2.50

1.25

3.40

2.5 pts

3.00

1.50

3.00

1.50

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

2.50

1.25

3.30

1.65

3.50

10.50

3.50

10.50

3.50

10.50

3.50

10.50

3.50

10.50

3.50

10.50

Project Understanding

Work Plan & Deliverables


4.10

5.00

SCORE WEIGHTED

15.0 pts

Cost of Services
5.10

max 25 pts

Total Score

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

51.00

51.00

52.50

51.50

52.00

PFR

51.60

298

Proponent

Evaluators
Netami

Katy

Ruthanne

Peter

Average
(1-5)

Lori

Weighted

The MBTW Group


1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

Proponent Profile & Experience

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

1.10

10.0 pts

4.00

8.00

4.00

8.00

3.50

7.00

4.00

8.00

4.00

8.00

3.90

7.80

1.20

5.0 pts

4.00

4.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

3.60

3.60

1.30

5.0 pts

4.50

4.50

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.10

4.10

1.40

5.0pts

4.50

4.50

4.00

4.00

3.50

3.50

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

Project Team Experience


2.10

5.0 pts

3.50

3.50

4.00

4.00

3.50

3.50

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

3.80

3.80

2.20

5.0 pts

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

3.50

3.50

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

3.90

3.90

3.10

10.0 pts

4.00

8.00

4.00

8.00

3.50

7.00

3.50

7.00

3.50

7.00

3.70

7.40

3.20

10.0 pts

3.00

6.00

3.00

6.00

3.50

7.00

4.00

8.00

3.50

7.00

3.40

6.80

3.30

2.5 pts

2.00

1.00

4.00

2.00

2.00

1.00

4.00

2.00

3.50

1.75

3.10

1.55

3.40

2.5 pts

2.00

1.00

4.00

2.00

2.00

1.00

4.00

2.00

3.50

1.75

3.10

1.55

3.00

9.00

3.00

9.00

2.50

7.50

2.50

7.50

3.50

10.50

2.90

8.70

Project Understanding

Work Plan & Deliverables


4.10

5.00

SCORE WEIGHTED

15.0 pts

Cost of Services
5.10

max 25 pts

Total Score

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

53.50

54.00

48.00

54.50

56.00

PFR

53.20

299

Proponent

Evaluators
Netami

Katy

Ruthanne

Peter

Average
(1-5)

Lori

Weighted

The Planning Partnership Ltd.


1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

Proponent Profile & Experience

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

1.10

10.0 pts

4.50

9.00

4.50

9.00

4.50

9.00

5.00

10.00

4.50

9.00

4.60

9.20

1.20

5.0 pts

3.00

3.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.50

4.50

3.90

3.90

1.30

5.0 pts

4.50

4.50

4.50

4.50

4.50

4.50

5.00

5.00

4.50

4.50

4.60

4.60

1.40

5.0pts

4.50

4.50

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.50

4.50

4.20

4.20

Project Team Experience


2.10

5.0 pts

4.50

4.50

5.00

5.00

4.50

4.50

4.00

4.00

4.50

4.50

4.50

4.50

2.20

5.0 pts

5.00

5.00

4.00

4.00

4.50

4.50

4.00

4.00

4.50

4.50

4.40

4.40

3.10

10.0 pts

4.50

9.00

5.00

10.00

5.00

10.00

4.00

8.00

4.50

9.00

4.60

9.20

3.20

10.0 pts

4.50

9.00

4.00

8.00

4.50

9.00

4.00

8.00

4.50

9.00

4.30

8.60

3.30

2.5 pts

4.00

2.00

3.50

1.75

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

4.50

2.25

4.00

2.00

3.40

2.5 pts

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

4.00

2.00

4.50

2.25

4.10

2.05

4.50

13.50

4.00

12.00

4.50

13.50

5.00

15.00

4.50

13.50

4.50

13.50

Project Understanding

Work Plan & Deliverables


4.10

5.00

SCORE WEIGHTED

15.0 pts

Cost of Services
5.10

max 25 pts

Total Score

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

19.07

66.00

64.25

67.00

66.00

67.50

85.22

PFR

300

Proponent

Evaluators
Netami

Katy

Ruthanne

Peter

Average
(1-5)

Lori

Weighted

Victor Ford & Associates Inc.


1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

Proponent Profile & Experience

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

SCORE WEIGHTED

10.0 pts

3.50

7.00

3.00

6.00

4.00

8.00

3.50

7.00

4.00

8.00

3.60

7.20

1.20

5.0 pts

3.00

3.00

3.50

3.50

3.50

3.50

2.00

2.00

3.50

3.50

3.10

3.10

1.30

5.0 pts

3.00

3.00

4.00

4.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.50

3.50

3.30

3.30

1.40

5.0pts

2.50

2.50

3.50

3.50

3.00

3.00

2.00

2.00

3.50

3.50

2.90

2.90

Project Team Experience


2.10

5.0 pts

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

3.50

3.50

3.90

3.90

2.20

5.0 pts

4.50

4.50

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

4.00

3.50

3.50

4.00

4.00

3.10

10.0 pts

4.00

8.00

3.50

7.00

3.50

7.00

4.00

8.00

4.00

8.00

3.80

7.60

3.20

10.0 pts

4.00

8.00

3.50

7.00

4.00

8.00

4.00

8.00

4.00

8.00

3.90

7.80

3.30

2.5 pts

3.00

1.50

2.50

1.25

3.00

1.50

4.00

2.00

3.50

1.75

3.20

1.60

3.40

2.5 pts

3.00

1.50

2.50

1.25

3.00

1.50

4.00

2.00

3.50

1.75

3.20

1.60

4.00

12.00

3.50

10.50

3.50

10.50

4.00

12.00

3.50

10.50

3.70

11.10

Project Understanding

Work Plan & Deliverables


4.10

5.00

SCORE WEIGHTED

1.10

15.0 pts

Cost of Services
5.10

max 25 pts

Total Score

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

55.00

52.00

54.00

54.00

55.50

PFR

54.10

301

HumberBayParksMasterPlan&Phase1ImplementationRFP
9118155046
ReferencesContactedforRecommendedVendor
Thefollowingrefereeswereincludedintheproposalbytherecommendedvendorforthiscall.The
refereeswereaskedthefollowing:
"IamcallingyoubecauseyournamewasprovidedasareferenceforDTAHinaproposalforservicesfor
parkmasterplanningwiththeCityofToronto.Asaformerclient/client'srepresentativeofDTAHfor
similarservices[mentionprojectfromForm7],pleasetellmeaboutyourexperiencewithDTAHand
provideanyinformationthatwillhelptoinformtheCity'sdecisionwhethertoawardacontractfor
masterplanningtoDTAH."

GarthArmour(contactedJanuary4th,2016)
Manager,HorticultureandGreenhouseOperations
4163920360

ourexperiencewasexcellent.
verythorough
theywereresponsiveintermsofeverythingtheywereaskedtodo
Irecommendgettingclarificationfromthemontheirinsurance,astherewassomeminorissuethat
wasresolved.

DavidStonehouse(contactedDecember18,2015)
Chair,WaterfrontSecretariat
4163928113

experiencewasexcellent.
BryceMirandawasoneofthebestIhaveworkedwith.

DavidKusturin(contactedJanuary4th,2016)
COO,WaterfrontToronto
4162141344x255
WTOhasalongandpositiverelationshipwiththisfirmthathasdesignedandmanagedthe
constructionofmuchoftherevitalizedwaterfrontinToronto
basedonwhatthey'vedeliveredovertheyears,WTOisveryhappyandthepublicisveryhappy
thereisnothingnegativetosay
wecontinuetoinvitethemtobidonworkforusandwewouldn'tdothatifweweren'tsatisfiedwith
theirwork.

PFR

302

PFR

303

PFR

304

PFR

305

PFR

306

iill TORONTO
Michael Pacholok
Chief Purchasing CUicial & Director

Purchasing & Materials Management Division


City Hall, 1901 Floor, West Tower
100 Queen Street West
Toronto, Ontario

Joanne Kehoe. Manager


Construction Services

MSFI 2N2

In:

Lori Ellis, Landscape Architect


I aiR, I oicstry and Recreation

From:

J oat ne Kehoc, P.4 at ;ue


Purchasing & Materials Management Division

Date:

October 13, 2015

Subject:

REP No. 9118155016

Enclosed arc seven (7) proposals received twin the following oponcnt for all Professional and
Technical Services to complete the Flutuher Ha) Park Master Plan and Phase I Intplcmentation.
Firm

Nanie

I.
2.

DTAI I
EOTI NN Consultants Inc.
(if 13 Inc.
Scott. Torrance Landscape Architect Inc.
The M I3TW Group *
The I I aiming Partnership Lid.
Victor I ord & Associates Inc. S

:.

4.

5.
ft
7.

These Firnis OfTered Environmentally Preferred Products/Service.


The docunwifi s attached are to be kept confidential and in your possession at all times. The
original docut Hunts arc being kept in Purchasing and Materials Management Division (PMMD),
therefore, please ensure that your copies are shredded Upon completion of award or at the end of
the contract.
Please exam inc these (ioeulnents. considering only those submitted with this letter, and prot ide
inc your reconunendat ion for award. To ensure that the contract(s) is awarded in a timely manner
and to Lie i I itate I he provision of the required coininod ity in a I iniely manner, it is recommended
that your written recommendation he provided to PM MD within 15 days from the date of this
inemorandun i. If a report to any Conitnittee, Council or I3oard is necessary as a result of this
Request for Proposals, a faint report iv required. Please provide a draft Committee Report for
PMMD to review as soon as possible in order to meet the next scheduled Committee agenda
deadlitie. The I inks to the Conun ace Renort templates ate provided for your convenietice:
13 id Committee

http:Hins ideto. toro:ito.ca/purcl uts ii w/w imd/li id tcmplatu.doc

Standing Con unittee ht t p:!? nsideto.t on nt o.ca/ptirchasm Lz)pd I/st a H report temnpl at eOY.pd t and
I p://i asidet o.t oront o.ca/secret ar at/st a H report/report tei npl at es/act iontenipl at e.dot

Please note that you must provide to PMMD a (let ailed summary of He evaluation resul Is, in order to
permit fttlfillmimetit of complete due diligence practices. NOTE: Do not write any personal notes on
the scoring sheets as these sheets are often requested by the Freedom of Inlormation Office. You

PFR

307

in ust also in aRe available to PM MD upon request, all replies arid 111(11 V id ual evaluation sheets horn
evaluation team members, and you are responsible for retaining the origiii;iI cleta: led individual
evaluation sheets for audit and other purposes. A copy of the Policy for tie Select ion and 1-firing of
I ro lessional and Consulting Serv ices and Request for Proposal procedures are avail able or t the liii ranet
at:
I1I1JLini!Mj.cii y.toronto.on.qjptnthasme/pol icipmcechircs.him
Please note that Section 7.5 of the Request for Proposal Procedure requires that all neiiihers of the
evaluation team are qual flied to properly evaluate t lie proposals and t lint each evaluation team member,
whether a stall member or an outside consultant, signs a Conflict of Interest Declaration disclosing any
entertainment, gifts or other benehts, iii cash or in kind, received front the proponent or their
representatives and certifying that he or she conducted tile evaluation in a fair and objective nuttier and.
free oh any conflict of interest or undue influence. The delnutnierit shall keeji copy of this declaration
br their records, and l)ro\ide a copy to the PMMD hu3er for the REP lIe. 11w Conflict of Inierest
Declaration form can be fcanid on the intrnnct at:

liii p://i nsldeto.cltv.torontoAuLcalpurchas !iW/word/p a lid lorin con] ict I Hint crest iloc
When rev iewi ni proposals for products/services von are to give consideration to
enviror mieni ally preferred products/services that nw be oil ered in accordance wit Ii the
I tn iroiiniental ly Responsible Procurement Statement attached to your Request for Proposals.
S houltl you not recommend environmentally preferred products/services ti at i nay have been
offered. pleise advise in detail your reasons.
Please ensure that your specifications for future acquisitions are. expanded to ensure the inclusion
of environmentally preferred protlticts/senices, wherever possible, as rcqu iied by t] te City of
rorontc) 1 nviwimieinal ly Responsible Procurement Policy.
f you have not already done so. please send a requisition wit Ii your recoinmendat ion in order
that a purchase order can be issued.
Attached is a Consultant Perfbnnanee Report I oral. This forn i can he used to tack t lie
penimce of \ei idors over the period of the contract wit Ii the C it It s not n iandatorv to fill
this lorin out however; it will be a useful evaluation tool when evaluating consultant
perforniarice and i niproving future call docuriient details.
.

Information ott how the. Consultant Performance Report Form works is in the attachment of this
menu).
Should you have any quest ions, pleise contact Mike Voelker at 41633 X01 X7.
Nc ii e: P1 ease treat all documentation tl iat has bee ii forwarded to you on this in at ter as
C( )N liIIWNTIAL.

[md

ostue

PFR

308

NON-DISCLOSURE AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION


THIS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND DECLARATION is given to the Oily of Toronto (the City) as of the
day oL_
.20
by__
as a participating member of
the Request for Proposals (RFP) Evaluation Team for RFP
(the Member) within
the City of Toronto.

#_______________

WHEREAS the Member will be reviewing and evaluating proposal documents submitted by the
proponents to the City that may contain confidential information (the Information);
AND WHEREAS it is a requirement of the City that no individuals may serve on the Evaluation Team
where a conflict of interest exists;
AND WHEREAS the City is relying on this declaration as a condition of the Member participating on the
Evaluation Team;

NOW THEREFORE, the Member acknowledges and declares as fellows:


CONFIDENTIALITY
1.

The Member acknowledges that it is a fundamental obligation of the Member:


(i)
(H)
(iii)
(iv)

2.

to maintain the Information as confidential:


not to disclose the Information or any part thereof to any third party;
not to use the Information for any purpose except for the purposes of conducting the
evaluation of proposals; and
not to copy or reproduce, in whole or in part, any of the Information without the Citys
prior written consent and to return to the Director of Purchasing and Materials
Management Division, upon request, all the Information and all copies thereof and all
derivative documents containing all or portions of the Information.

The above obligations in 1Q)(H)(Hi) and (iv) shall not apply to any Information which is or which
becomes generally known to the public by means other than a breach of this Agreement by a
Member.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
3

The Member declares that he or she or any member of his or her immediate family:
(i)
(H)
(Hi)

(iv)
(v)
(vi)

has no: received any gifts, entertainment, or other benefits, in cash or in kind, from any
proponents or their representatives:
has no direct or indirect financial interest in the award of the contract for this RFP;
has not been in the employ of, under contract with or involved in a business association
such as a partnership or joint venture with any proponents within one year prior to the
publication date of this RFP;
is not currently employed by, under contract with or involved in a business association
such as a partnership or joint venture with any proponent;
is not negotiating nor has any arrangement concerning future employment, contracting or
business association with any proponent; and
has no ownership interest in, and is not an officer or director of, any proponent or any
related company of a proponent.

4.

The Member declares that he or she is familiar with the Citys Conflict of Interest Policy that governs
all Cty employees, and has reported any and all personal or financial interests that might present a
conflict or bias in connection with his or her participation on the Evaluation Team.

5.

The Member certifies that he or she will conduct the evaluation in a fair and objective manner, free
from any contl.ct of interest or undue influence.

THE MEMBER OF THE EVALUATION TEAM


Name:

Signature:

PFR

309

NON-DISCLOSURE AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARA11ON


THIS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND DECLARATION is given to the City of Toront (the
o
City) as of the
1 day of N V
Ei
20..js by __Z
_! f _ as a partIctpatng member of
the Request for Proposals (RFP) Evaluation Team for RFP
#_9i, cttthe Member) within

the City of Toronto.

WHEREAS the Member will be reviewing and evaluating proposal docum


ents submitted by the
proponents to the City that may contain confidential information (the Information);
AND WHEREAS it is a requirement of the City that no individuals may serve on the
Evaluation Team
where a conflict of interest exists;
AND WHEREAS the City is relying on this declaration as a condition of the Memb
er participating on the
Evaluation Team;
NOW THEREFORE, the Member acknowledges and declares as follows:
CONFIDENTIALITY
1. The Member acknowledges that it is a fundamental obligation of the Memb
er:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)

2.

to maintain the Information as confidential;


not to disclose the Information or any part thereof to any third party;
not to use the Information for any purpose except for the purposes of conduc
ting the
evaluation of proposals; and
not to copy or reproduce, in whole or in part, any of the Information without the
Citys
prior written consent and to return to the Director of Purchasing and
Materials
Management Division, upon request, all the Information and all copies thereof
and all
derivative documents containing all or portions of the Information.

The above obligations in 1 (i)(ii)(iii) and (iv) shall not apply to any Information
which is or which
becomes generally known to the public by means other than a breach
of this Agreement by a
Member.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
3.

The Member declares that he or she or any member of his or her immediate
family:
(i)
has not received any gifts, entertainment, or other benefits, in cash or in kind,
from any
proponents or their representatives;
(ii)
has no direct or indirect financial interest in the award of the contract for this
RFP;
(iii)
has not been in the employ of, under contract with or involved in a busine
ss association
such as a partnership or joint venture with any proponents within one year
prior to the
publication date of this REP;
(iv)
is not currently employed by, under contract with or involved in a busine
ss association
such as a partnership or joint venture with any proponent;
(v)
is not negotiating nor has any arrangement concerning future employment,
contracting or
business association with any proponent; and
(vi)
has no ownership interest in, and is not an officer or director of, any propon
ent or any
related company of a proponent.

4.

The Member declares that he or she is familiar with the Citys Conflict of
Interest Policy that governs
all City employees, and has reported any and all personal or financi
al interests that might present a
conflict or bias in connection with his or her participation on the Evalua
tion Team.

5.

The Member certifies that he or she will conduct the evaluation in fair
a
and objective manner, free
from any conflict of interest or undue influence.

THE MEMBER OF THE EVALUATION TEAM

Name:
,

Signature:

_Ih

/7

ct&
-1

PFR

310

PFR

311

PFR

312

PFR

313

PFR

314

PFR

315

PFR

316

PFR

317

PFR

318

PFR

319

PFR

320

PFR

321

PFR

322

PFR

323

PFR

324

PFR

325

PFR

326

PFR

327

PFR

328

PFR

329

PFR

330

PFR

331

PFR

332

PFR

333

PFR

334

PFR

335

PFR

336

PFR

337

PFR

338

S-ar putea să vă placă și