"Split or Steal: An Analysis Using Game Theory." Cornell University, 04 Sept. 2012. Web.

06
June 2016.
This Source is trustworthy because it describes what happened during this game show. It comes
from Cornell University, which is a prominent medical school in new york. It is also an IB
league school. This article describes some of the mathematics of the scenario

Iess_B3_H-O, 4/12/07, 4:13 Pm, and Page 540. NASH EQUILIBRIUM(n.d.): n. pag. Web.
This is trustworthy because It comes from Columbia university. Columbia Is a University in new
york. This shows it is trustworthy because they have many professors there to verify its validity.
In this article, it describes the nash equilibrium.

"Two-Person Zero-Sum Game Theory." (n.d.): n. pag. Econweb.ucsd.edu. UC San Diego

Department of Economics. Web.
This is a trustworthy source because it is a government sponsored site. This source is from the
san Diego department of economics.This gives a description of Zero Sum game theory. There are
many branches in it and it gives real world examples of it such as heads or tails and rock paper
scissors

"Prisoner's Dilemma." Stanford. Stanford, 4 Sept. 1997. Web.

This is a trusty worthy because it comes from a college. In the article, it describes the prisoner's
dilemma. The prisoner's dilemma is relevant Because it highlights different parts of game theory
such as the nash equilibrium.

"Golden Balls - 100,000 Split Or Steal? 14/03/08 - YouTube." Youtube. GoldenBollocks, 14 Apr.
2008. Web.
This is trustworthy Because it shows the scenario that my paper I about. This is important because
the scenario is one that is related to the prisoner's dilemma. In the video, it shows 2 men on a game
show where the have a chance to win around 13,000 dollars. When they talk to decide their decision
one of the men lies and chooses to split.