UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES

COLLEGE OF LAW
DILIMAN, QUEZON CITY

COURSE OUTLINE

ON

CIVIL PROCEDURE

Second Semester, AY 2014-2015

DAN PERUELO CALICA

I.

INTRODUCTION
A.

B.

Remedial law and Substantive law

1.

Bustos v. Lucero, 81 Phil. 640 (1948)

2.

Fabian v. Desierto, G.R. No. 129742, September 16, 1998, 295

SCRA 470 (1998)

3.

Ernestina Bernabe v. Carolina Alejo, G.R. No. 140500, 21

January 2002

4.

Tupas v. Court of Appeals, 193 SCRA 597 (1991)

Objectives of, and power to promulgate, rules of pleading,

practice and procedure
1.

CONST., art. VIII, sec. 5 (5)

2.

Shioji v. Harvey, 43 Phil. 333 (1922)

3.

Andrea Tan, et al. v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc., G.R. No. 148420,
15 December 2005

4.

Re: Petition for Recognition of the Exemption of the

Government Service Insurance System from Payment of Legal

Fees, A.M. No. 08-2-01-0, February 11, 2010

5.

C.

Baguio Market Vendors Multi-Purpose Cooperative v. Hon.

Iluminada Cabato-Cortez, G.R. No. 165922, 26 February 2010

Rules of Court
RULES OF COURT, Rule 1
1.

Title
RULES

COURT, Rule 1, sec. 1

2.

Courts applicable
RULES OF COURT, Rule 1, sec. 2

3.

Cases covered
a.
b.
c.

RULES OF COURT, Rule 1, sec. 3

Civil action, Criminal action, Special proceedings
Patricia Natcher v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 133000, 2
October 2001

4.

Cases not applicable

RULES OF COURT, Rule 1, sec. 4

5.

Liberal construction of the rules

a.
b.
c.
d.

D.

OF

Alonso v. Villamor, 16 Phil 315 (1910)

Berkenkotter v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-36629,
September 28, 1973, 53 SCRA 228 (1973)
Galdo v. Rosete, G.R. No. L-47342, July 25, 1978, 84
SCRA 238 (1978)
Artistica Ceramica, Inc., et al. v. Ciudad del Carmen
Homeowners Association, Inc., et al., G.R. Nos. 16758384, June 16, 2010

No vested rights in procedural rules; may be applied retroactively

1.

Perla S. Zulueta v. Asia Brewery Inc., G.R. No. 138137, 8

March 2001

E.

Courts applicable and Uniform Procedure

1.
2.

F.

2.

II.

OF
OF

COURT, Rule 5
COURT, Rule 1, sec. 4

Courts of law and of equity

1.

G.

RULES
RULES

Bernardo Valdevieso v. Candelario Damalerio, G.R. No.

133303, 17 February 2005
GF Equity Inc. v. Arturo Valenzona, G.R. No. 156841, 30 June
2005

Philippine courts
1.

Existing Philippine courts: (a) Supreme Court, (b) Court of

Appeals, (c) Regional Trial Courts, (d) Metropolitan Trial
Courts, Municipal Trial Court, Municipal Circuit Trial Court ,
(e) Special Courts (Sandiganbayan, Court of Tax Appeals,
Family Courts, Commercial Courts, Environmental Courts)

2.

Courts of original
jurisdiction

3.

Courts of general jurisdiction v. Courts of special or limited

jurisdiction

4.

Superior courts v. Lower or inferior courts

5.

Courts of record v. Courts not of record

6.

Constitutional courts v. Statutory courts

jurisdiction

v.

Courts

of

appellate

JURISDICTION
A.

General concepts
CONST., art. VIII, secs. 1 & 2
1.

Jurisdiction in general
a.

Bank of the Philippines Islands v. Hong, et al., G.R. No.

b.
c.
d.
e.
f.

2.

Jurisdiction v. Venue
a.
b.
c.

3.

Manila Railroad Company v. Attorney General, 20 Phil.

406 (1911)
Nocum and Philippine Daily Inquirer v. Tan, G.R. No.
145022, September 23, 2005, 470 SCRA 639 (2005)
Chavez v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 125813, February
6, 2007, 514 SCRA 279 (2007)

Payment of filing fees

a.
b.
c.
d.

4.

161771, February 15, 2012

Decano v. Edu, G.R. No. L-30070, August 29, 1980, 99
SCRA 410 (1980)
Bangus Fry Fisherfolk, et al. v. Enrico Lanzanas, G.R.
No. 131442, 10 July 2003
Tolentino v. Leviste, G.R. No. 156118, 19 November 2004
Southern Food Sales Corporation v. Bernardo Salas,
G.R. No. 56428, 18 February 1992
Augusto Mangahas v. Victoria Isabel Paredes, G.R. No.
157866, 14 February 2007

Manchester Development Co. v. Court of Appeals, G.R.

No. 75919, May 7, 1987, 149 SCRA 562 (1987)
Sun Insurance Office, Ltd. et al. v. Asuncion, G.R. Nos.
79937-38, February 13, 1989, 170 SCRA 274 (1989)
Colarina v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 117439, February
25, 1999, 303 SCRA 647 (1999)
Ruby Shelter Builders and Realty Development Corp. v.
Formaran, G.R. No. 175914, February 10, 2009, 578 SCRA
283 (2009)

Estoppel
a.
b.

Tijam v. Sibonghanoy, G.R. No. L-21450, April 15, 1968,

23 SCRA 29 (1968)
Figueroa v. People, G.R. No. 147406, July 14, 2008, 558
SCRA 63 (2008)

5.

Error of jurisdiction v. Error of judgment

a.

B.

Fernando v. Vasquez, G.R. No. L-26417, January 30,

1970, 31 SCRA 288 (1970)

Jurisdiction over the subject matter of the diferent levels of courts in

civil cases
1.

Supreme Court
a.
b.
c.

d.
e.
f.
2.

Court of Appeals
a.
b.

c.
d.
e.

3.

CONST., Art. VIII, secs. 1, 2 & 5; Art. VI, sec. 30; Art. VII,
secs. 4 & 18; Art. IX, sec. 7
Republic Act No. 296 (1948), as amended, sec. 17
Rep. Act No. 7902 (1995) and RULES OF COURT, Rule
43, sec. 1, Rule 45, sec. 1, Rule 65, sec. 4, Rule 66, sec.
7, Rule 102, sec. 2
Cruz v. Mijares, G.R. No. 154464, September 11, 2008,
564 SCRA 501 (2008)
First Lepanto Ceramics, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 110571, October 7, 1994, 237 SCRA 519 (1994)
Fabian v. Desierto, supra

Batas Blg. 129 (1980), sec. 9, as amended by Rep. Act

No. 7902 (1995)
RULES OF COURT, Rule 43, secs. 1, 2 and 3, Rule 41, sec.
2, Rule 47, sec. 1, Rule 65, sec. 4, Rule 66, sec. 7, Rule
102, sec. 2
Re: Cases Appealed from the Peoples Court, 82 Phil.
111 (1948)
Aragon v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 124333, March 26,
1997, 270 SCRA 603 (1997)
St. Martin Funeral Home v. National Labor Relations
Commission, G.R. No. 130866, 16 September 1998

Regional Trial Courts

a.

Batas Blg. 129 (1980), secs. 18-23, as amended by Rep.

Act No. 7691 (1994)

b.
c.

c.
d.
e.

f.
g.

4.

Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal

Municipal Circuit Trial Courts
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.

5.

Admin. Circular 09-94, June 14, 1994

RULES OF COURT, Rule 40, sec. 1, Rule 41, sec. 2, Rule
42, sec. 1 and 2, Rule 65, sec. 4, Rule 66, sec. 7, Rule
102, sec. 2
Katon v. Palanca, Jr., G.R. No. 151149, September 7,
2004, 437 SCRA 565 (2004)
Encarnacion v. Amigo, G.R. No. 169793, September 15,
2006, 502 SCRA 172 (2006)
Radio Communications of the Philippines, Inc. v. Court
of Appeals, G.R. No. 136109, August 1, 2002, 386 SCRA
67 (2002)
Bokingo v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 161739, May 4,
2006, 489 SCRA 521 (2006)
Lu v. Lu Ym, G.R. No. 153690, August 26, 2008, 563
SCRA 254 (2008)
Trial

Courts

Batas Blg. 129 (1980), secs. 32-35, as amended by

Rep. Act No. 7691 (1994)
Revised Rules on Summary Procedure (1991)
A.M. No. 08-8-7-SC, September 9, 2008, RULES OF
COURT, Rule 70, sec. 1
Reyes v. Sta. Maria, G.R. No. L-33213, June 29, 1979, 91
SCRA 164 (1979)
Ortigas & Co., Ltd. v. Herrera, G.R. No. 36098, January
21, 1983, 120 SCRA 89 (1983)
Ortigas & Co., Ltd. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 52488,
July 25, 1981, 106 SCRA 121 (1981)
Nera v. Vacante, G.R. No. L-15725, November 29, 1961,
3 SCRA 505 (1961)
Villostas v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 96271, June 26,
1992, 210 SCRA 490 (1992)
Vda. De Barrera v. Heirs of Vicente Legaspi, G.R. No.
174346, September 12, 2008, 585 SCRA 192 (2008)

Specialized courts
a.

and

Family courts Rep. Act No. 8369 (1997), sec. 5

i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.

b.

Commercial courts Rep. Act No. 8799 (2000), sec. 5,

par. (2)
i.
ii.
iii.

c.

A.M. No. 02-1-06-SC, January 22, 2002

A.M. No. 03-03-03-SC, June 17, 2003

Other tribunals and agencies

a.
b.
c.
d.

7.

A.M. No. 01-2-04, March 13, 2001

A.M. No. 04-9-07-SC, September 14, 2004
Reyes v. Regional Trial Court of Makati, G.R. No.
165744, August 11, 2008, 561 SCRA 593 (2008)

Intellectual property courts Rep. Act No. 8293 (1997)

i.
ii.

6.

A.M. No. 02-11-10-SC, March 4, 2003

A.M. No. 02-11-11, March 4, 2003
A.M. No. 02-11-12, March 4, 2003
Madrian v. Madrian, G.R. No. 159374, July 12,
2007, 527 SCRA 487 (2007)
Thornton v. Thornton, G.R. No. 154598, August 16,
2004, 437 SCRA 550 (2004)

Securities and Exchange Commission - Rep. Act No.

8799 (2000), sec. 5, par. (1)
National Labor Relations Commission Pres. Decree No.
442 (1974), arts. 213-225, as amended
Insurance Commission Pres. Decree No. 612 (1974),
sec. 414-416
Energy Regulatory Commission Rep. Act No. 9136
(2001), sec. 38, 41, 43-46

Katarungang Pambarangay
a.
b.
c.
d.

Rep. Act No. 7160 (1991), secs. 399-422

Adm. Circular No. 14-93, July 15, 1993
Uy v. Contreras, G.R. Nos. 111416-17, September 26,
1994, 237 SCRA 167 (1994)
Gonzales v. Court of Appeals, G.R. Nos. 59495-97, June

e.
f.
g.
h.

III.

26, 1987, 151 SCRA 289 (1997)

Agbayani v. Belen, G.R. No. L-65629, November 24,
1986, 145 SCRA 635 (1986)
Blardony v. Coscolluela, G.R. No. 70261, February 28,
1990, 182 SCRA 825 (1990)
Wee v. De Castro, G.R. No. 176405, August 20, 2008,
562 SCRA 695 (2008)
Aquino v. Aure, G.R. No. 153567, February 18, 2008, 546
SCRA 71 (2008)

CIVIL ACTIONS AND CAUSE OF ACTION

A.

Civil action v. Special proceeding

Patricia Natcher v. Court of Appeals, supra

B.

Ordinary and special civil actions

RULES OF COURT, Rule 1, sec. 3(a)

C.

Real actions and Personal actions

D.

E.

1.

RULES

2.

Jorge C. Paderanga v. Dimalanes Buissan, G.R. No. 49475, 28

September 1993

OF

COURT, Rule 4, sec. 1 and 2

Actions in rem, Actions in personam and Actions quasi in rem

1.

RULES

2.

Jorge C. Paderanga v. Dimalanes Buissan, supra

3.

Jesse U. Lucas v. Jesus S. Lucas, G.R. No. 190710, 6 June

2011

OF

COURT, Rule 39, sec. 47 and 48

Commencement of actions
1.

RULES

2.

Manchester Development Co. v. Court of Appeals, supra

OF

COURT, Rule 1, sec. 5

3.
F.

Proceedings in civil actions

1.

G.

H.

I.

IV.

Sun Insurance Office, Ltd. et al. v. Asuncion, supra

Bro. Mariano Mike Velarde v. Social Justice Society, G.R. No.

159357, 28 April 2004

Cause of Action
1.

RULES

2.

Danfoss, Inc. v. Continental Cement Corporation, G.R. No.

143788, September 9, 2005, 469 SCRA 505 (2005)

3.

Du v. Jayoma, et al., G.R. No. 175042, April 23, 2012

4.

Sagrada Orden de Precadores del Santisimo Rosario de

Filipinas v. National Coconut Corporation, 91 Phil. 503 (1952)

5.

Felipe v. Leuterio, 91 Phil. 482 (1952)

6.

Ma-ao Sugar Central Co. v. Barrios, 79 Phil. 666 (1947)

OF

COURT, Rule 2, sec. 1 and 2

One suit for a single cause of action; efect of splitting single cause
1.

RULES OF COURT, Rule 2, sec. 3 and 4 and Rule 16, sec. 1(e)
and (f)

2.

Fidel O. Chua v. Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company, G.R.

No. 182311, 19 August 2009

Joinder and misjoinder of causes of action

1.

RULES

2.

Sps. Victor & Milagros Perez v. Antonio Hermano, G.R. No.

147417, 8 July 2005

VENUE

OF

COURT, Rule 2, sec. 3 and 4

10

A.

CONST., art. VIII, sec. 5, par. (4)

B.

RULES

C.

Batas Blg. 129 (1980), sec. 18

D.

Cases

OF

COURT, Rule 4

1.

Claridades v. Mercader, G.R. No. L-20341, May 14, 1966, 17

SCRA 1 (1966)

2.

Uniwide Holdings, Inc. v. Cruz, G.R. No. 171456, August 9,

2007, 529 SCRA 664 (2007)

3.

Go v. United Coconut Planters Bank, G.R. No. 156187,

November 11, 2004, 442 SCRA 264 (2004)

4.

Davao Abaca Plantation Co., Inc. v. Dole Philippines, Inc.,

G.R. No. 134431, December 1, 2000, 346 SCRA 682 (2000)

5.

Infante v. Aran Builders, Inc., G.R. No. 156596, August 24,

2007, 531 SCRA 123 (2007)

6.

Marcos-Araneta, et al. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 154096,

August 22, 2008, 563 SCRA 41 (2008)

7.

Sweet Line, Inc. v. Teves, G.R. No. L-37750, May 19, 1978, 83
SCRA 361 (1978)

8.

Villanueva v. Mosqueda, G.R. No. L-58287, August 19, 1982, 115

SCRA 904 (1982)

9.

Philippine Banking Corporation v. Tensuan, G.R. No. 104649,

February 28, 1994, 230 SCRA 413 (1994)

10.

Spouses Lantin v. Lantion, et al., G.R. No. 160053, August 28,

2006, 499 SCRA 718 (2006)

11.

Eastern Assurance & Surety Corp. v. Cui, G.R. No. 54452, July
20, 1981, 105 SCRA 682 (1981)

11

V.

PARTIES
A.

B.

C.

Capacity to sue and be sued

1.

RULES

2.

Rep. Act No. 5455 (1968), sec. 1, par. (1)

3.

MR Holdings, Ltd. v. Bajar, G.R. No. 138104, April 11, 2002,

380 SCRA 617 (2002)

COURT, Rule 3, secs. 1, 4, 5 and 15

Real party in interest

1.

RULES

2.

Carlos v. Sandoval, G.R. No. 179922, December 16, 2008, 574

SCRA 116 (2008)

3.

Peoples Homesite and Housing Corp. v. Jeremias, G.R. No. L43252, September 30, 1976, 73 SCRA 239 (1976)

OF

COURT, Rule 3, sec. 2

Representative parties
1.

D.

OF

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 3, sec. 3

OF

COURT, Rule 3, sec. 12

Class suit
1.

RULES

2.

Newsweek, Inc. v. Intermediate Appellate Court, et al., G.R.

No. L-63559, May 30, 1986, 142 SCRA 171 (1986)

3.

MVRS Publications, Inc. v. Islamic Da'wah Council of the

Philippines, Inc., G.R. No. 135306, January 28, 2003, 396
SCRA 210 (2003)

4.

Juana Complex I Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Fil-Estate

Land, Inc., G.R. Nos. 152272 and 152397, 5 March 2012

12

5.

E.

F.

G.

Joinder of parties
1.

RULES

2.

Relucio v. Lopez, G.R. No. 138497, January 16, 2001, 373

SCRA 578 (2001)

3.

De Galicia v. Mercado, G.R. No. 146744, March 6, 2006, 484

SCRA 131 (2006)

4.

Nufable v. Nufable, G.R. No. 126950, July 2, 1999, 309 SCRA

694 (1999)

5.

Puentevella, Jr., et al. v. Far Eastern Air Transport, Inc., et al.,

94 Phil. 644 (1954)

COURT, Rule 3, secs. 6-11

1.

RULES

2.

Brioso v. Rili-Mariano, et al., G.R. No. 132765, January 31,

2003, 396 SCRA 549 (2003)

3.

State Investment House, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

106795, November 16, 1999, 318 SCRA 47 (1999)

OF

COURT, Rule 3, secs. 16-20

Alternative & unknown defendants

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 3, secs. 13-14

Indigent party
1.

I.

OF

Substitution of parties

1.
H.

Re: Request of the Plaintifs, Heirs of the Passengers of the

Doa Paz to Set Aside the Order dated January 4, 1988 of
Judge B.D. Chingcuangco, A.M. No. 88-1-646-0, 3 March 1988

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 3, sec. 21

Solicitor General

13

1.
J.

RULES

COURT, Rule 3, sec. 22

New/additional parties
1.

Impleader
a.
b.

c.

2.

RULES OF COURT, Rule 6, secs. 11-13; Rule 11, sec. 5

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. of the Philippines v.
Tempongko, G.R. No. L-24399, March 28, 1969, 27 SCRA
418 (1969)
Balbastro, et al. v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. L33255, November 29, 1972, 48 SCRA 231 (1972)

Intervention
a.
b.

3.

RULES OF COURT, Rule 19

Director of Lands v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. L45168, September 25, 1979, 93 SCRA 238 (1979)

Interpleader
a.
b.
c.

d.

VI.

OF

RULES OF COURT, Rule 62

Wack Wack Golf & Country Club, Inc. v. Lee E. Won, G.R.
No. L-23851, March 26, 1976, 70 SCRA 165 (1976)
United Coconut Planters Bank v. Intermediate Appellate
Court, et al., G.R. Nos. 72664-65, March 20, 1990, 183
SCRA 368 (1990)
Pasricha, et al. v. Don Luis Dison Realty, Inc., G.R. No.
136409, March 14, 2008, 548 SCRA 673 (2008)

SUMMONS
A.

Issuance and contents of the summons

1.

B.

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 14, secs. 1-2

Service of summons
1.

By whom issued

14

a.
2.

OF

COURT, Rule 14, secs. 1 & 5

By whom made
a.
b.

3.

RULES

RULES OF COURT, Rule 14, sec. 3

Bello v. Ubo, at al., G.R. No. L-30353, September 30,
1982, 117 SCRA 91 (1982)

Modes of service
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.

j.
k.
l.
m.
n.

o.

RULES OF COURT, Rule 14, secs. 6-17, 20

Spouses Laus v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No.
101256, March 8, 1993, 219 SCRA 688 (1993)
Keister v. Navarro, G.R. No. L-29067, May 31, 1977, 77
SCRA 209 (1977)
Summit Trading & Devt. Corp. v. Avendao, G.R. No.
60038, March 18, 1985, 135 SCRA 397 (1985)
Cariaga, Jr., et al. v. Malaya, et al., G.R. No. L-48375,
August 13, 1986, 143 SCRA 441 (1986)
Rebollido, et al. v. Court of Appeals, et. al, G.R. No.
81123, February 28, 1989, 170 SCRA 800 (1989)
Magdalena Estate, Inc. v. Nieto, et al., G.R. No. L-54242,
November 25, 1983, 125 SCRA 758 (1983)
United Coconut Planters Bank v. Ongpin, G.R. No.
146593, October 26, 2001, 368 SCRA 464 (2001)
Guiguinto Credit Cooperative, Inc. v. Torres, et al.,
G.R. No. 170926, September 15, 2006, 502 SCRA 182
(2006)
Guanzon v. Arradaza, et al., G.R. No. 155392, December
6, 2006, 510 SCRA 309 (2006)
Potenciano v. Barnes, G.R. No. 159421, August 20,
2008, 562 SCRA 485 (2008)
Mangila v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 125027,
August 12, 2002, 387 SCRA 162 (2002)
Montefalcon, et al. v. Vasquez, G.R. No. 165016, June
17, 2008, 554 SCRA 513 (2008)
Perkin Elmer Singapore PTE Ltd. v. Dakila Trading
Corp., G.R. No. 172242, August 14, 2007, 530 SCRA 170
(2007)
Regner v. Logarta, et al., G.R. No. 168747, October 19,

15

p.

q.
r.

4.

Proof of service; alias summons

a.
b.
c.

5.

VII.

RULES OF COURT, Rule 14, secs. 5, 18-19

Mechanical Appliance Co. v. Castleman, 215 U.S. 437
(1910)
Hock v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 60848, May 20,
1991,197 SCRA 223 (1991)

Return of service
a.

C.

2007, 537 SCRA 277 (2007)

Philippine Commercial International Bank v. Alejandro,
G.R. No. 175587, September 21, 2007, 533 SCRA 738
(2007)
Spouses Mason v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No.
144662, October 13, 2003, 413 SCRA 303 (2003)
Millenium Industrial Commercial Corporation v. Tan, G.R.
No. 131724, February 28, 2000, 326 SCRA 563 (2000)

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 14, secs. 4-5

Voluntary appearance
1.

RULES

2.

United Coconut Planters Bank v. Ongpin, G.R. No. 146593,

October 26, 2001, 368 SCRA 464 (2001)

3.

Orosa, et al. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 118696, September

3, 1996, 261 SCRA 376 (1996)

OF

COURT, Rule 14, sec. 20

PLEADINGS
A.

Pleadings in general
1.

RULES

2.

Batas Blg. 129 (1980), sec. 36

3.

Revised Rule on Summary Procedure (1991)

OF

COURT, Rule 6, secs. 1-2; Rule 8, sec. 1

16

4.

B.

A.M. No. 08-8-7-SC, 9 September 2008 or The Rule of

Procedure for Small Claims Cases

Complaint
1.

Generally
a.
b.

2.

Splitting & joinder of causes of action

a.
b.

3.
C.

D.

RULES OF COURT, Rule 6, sec. 3; Rule 2, secs. 1 & 2

Batas Blg. 129 (1980), sec. 33, par. (1)

RULES OF COURT, Rule 2, secs. 3-6

De Luzuriaga, Sr. v. Adil, G.R. No. L-58912, May 7,
1985 136 SCRA 279 (1985)

Alternative

Answer
1.

RULES OF COURT, Rule 6, secs. 4-5; Rule 8, secs. 10 and 11;

Rule 9, secs. 1-2

2.

Home Ins. Co. v. Eastern Shipping Lines, 123 SCRA 424

(1983)

Counterclaim and cross-claim

1.

RULES OF COURT, Rule 6, secs. 6-9, 12; Rule 9, sec. 2; Rule 11,
secs. 8-10

2.

International Container Terminal Services, Inc. v. Court of

Appeals, G.R. No. 90530, October 7, 1992, 214 SCRA 456
(1992)

3.

Spouses Meliton v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 101883,

December 11, 1992, 216 SCRA 485 (1992)

4.

Alday v. FGU Insurance Corp., G.R. No. 138822, January 23,

17

2001, 350 SCRA 113 (2001)

E.

5.

Cruz-Agana v. Santiago-Lagman, G.R. No. 139018, April 11,

2005, 455 SCRA 203 (2005)

6.

Ruiz, Jr., et al. v. Court of Appeals et al., G.R. No. 101566,

August 17, 1992, 212 SCRA 660 (1992)

Reply
1.

F.

G.

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 6, sec. 10

Formal requirements of pleadings

1.

RULES

2.

A.M. No. 11-9-4-SC, 13 November 2012, or the Efficient Use

of Paper Rule

3.

Republic v. Kenrick Development Corporation, G.R. No.

149576, August 8, 2006, 498 SCRA 220 (2006)

4.

Digital Microwave Corporation v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

128550, March 16, 2000, 336 SCRA 419 (2000)

5.

Kaunlaran Lending Investors, Inc., et al. v. Uy, G.R. No. 154974,

February 4, 2008, 543 SCRA 474 (2008)

6.

Spouses Valmonte v. Alcala, et al., G.R. No. 168667, July 23,

2008, 559 SCRA 536 (2008)

OF

COURT, Rule 7

Detail in pleading
1.

RULES

2.

Bacolod-Murcia Milling Co., Inc. v. First Farmers Milling

Co., Inc., et al., G.R. No. L-29041, March 24, 1981, 103 SCRA
436 (1981)

3.

Far East Marble v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 94093,

OF

COURT, Rule 8, secs. 1-9; Rule 12

18

August 10, 1993, 225 SCRA 249 (1993)

H.

4.

Filipinas Textile, et al. v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No.

119800, November 12, 2003, 415 SCRA 635 (2003)

5.

Toribio v. Bidin, G.R. No. 57821, January 17, 1985, 134 SCRA
162 (1985)

Amended and supplemental pleadings

1.

RULES

2.

Keramik Industries, Inc. v. Guerrero, G.R. No. L-38866,

November 29, 1974, 61 SCRA 265 (1974)

3.

R & B Surety & Ins. Col, Inc. v. Savellano, G.R. No. L-45234,
May 8, 1985, 136 SCRA 312 (1985)

4.

Remington Industrial Sales Corp. v. Court of Appeals, et al.,

G.R. No. 133657, May 29, 2002, 382 SCRA 499 (2002)

5.

Asset Privatization Trust v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No.

81024, February 3, 2000, 324 SCRA 533 (2000)

6.

Cagungun, et al. v. Planters Development Bank, G.R. No.

158674, October 17, 2005, 473 SCRA 259 (2005)

OF

COURT, Rule 10

I.

Judicial Affidavit Rule

A.M. No. 12-8-8-SC, 4 September 2012

J.

Periods for pleading

K.

1.

RULES

2.

Alarilla v. Ocampo, G.R. No. 144697, December 10, 2003, 417

SCRA 601 (2003)

OF

COURT, Rule 11; Rule 22

Filing and service of pleadings & other papers

1.

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 13

19

VIII. MOTIONS

IX.

A.

RULES

B.

Batas Blg.129 (1980), sec. 16

C.

Cases

OF

COURT, Rule 15; Rule 133, sec. 7

1.

Cledera, et al. v. Sarmiento, et al., G.R. Nos. L-32450-51, June

10, 1971, 39 SCRA 552 (1971)

2.

Cruz v. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 123340, August 29,

2002, 388 SCRA 72 (2002)

3.

KKK Foundation, Inc. v. Bargas, et al., G.R. No. 163785,

December 27, 2007, 541 SCRA 432 (2007)

4.

Aneco
Realty
Development
Corporation
v.
Landex
Development Corporation, G.R. No. 165952, July 28, 2008, 560
SCRA 182 (2008)

OBJECTIONS TO PLEADINGS
A.

Motion to dismiss
1.

Generally
a.

2.

Borje v. CFI of Misamis Occidental, G.R. No. L-48315,

February 27, 1979, 88 SCRA 576 (1979)

Want of jurisdiction
a.
b.
c.
d.

RULES OF COURT, Rule 16, sec. 1, par. (a) and (b)

Andaya v. Abadia, G.R. No. 104033, December 27, 1993,
228 SCRA 705 (1993)
Department of Agrarian Reform v. Abdulwahid, et al.,
G.R. No. 163285, February 27, 2008, 547 SCRA 30 (2008)
Republic v. Glasgow Credit and Collection Services, Inc.,
G.R. No. 170281, January 18, 2008, 542 SCRA 95(2008)

20

3.

Improper venue
a.

4.

COURT, Rule 16, sec. 1, par. (c)

RULES OF COURT, Rule 16, sec. 1, par. (d)

Evangelista, et al. v. Santiago, G.R. No. 157447, April 29,
2005, 457 SCRA 744 (2005)

Litis pendentia
a.
b.
c.
d.

6.

OF

Want of legal capacity to sue

a.
b.

5.

RULES

RULES OF COURT, Rule 16, sec. 1, par. (e)

Arceo v. Oliveros, G.R. No. L-38251, January 31, 1985,
134 SCRA 308 (1985)
Buan, et al. v. Lopez, Jr., G.R. No. L-75349, October 13,
1986, 145 SCRA 34 (1986)
Investors Finance Corporation v. Ebarle, et al., G.R. No.
70640, June 29, 1988, 163 SCRA 60 (1988)

Res judicata and statute of limitations

a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.

RULES OF COURT, Rule 16, sec. 1, par. (f); Rule 39, sec.
47
Oropeza Marketing Corp. v. Allied Banking Corp., G.R.
No. 129788, December 3, 2002, 393 SCRA 278 (2002)
Carandang v. Venturanza, G.R. No. L-41940, November
21, 1984, 133 SCRA 344 (1984)
Manila Electric Co. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L33794, May 31, 1982, 114 SCRA 173 (1982)
Avisado v. Rumbaua, G.R. No. 137306, March 12, 2001,
354 SCRA 245 (2001)
Arreza v. Diaz, G.R. No. 133113, August 30, 2001, 364
SCRA 88 (2001)
Francisco v. Roque Co, et al., G.R. No. 151339, January
31, 2006, 481 SCRA 241 (2006)
Cruz v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 164797, February 13,
2006, 482 SCRA 379 (2006)
Pascual v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 115925, August 15,

21

2003, 409 SCRA 105 (2003)

Cf.

Law of the case

a.
b.

7.

Insufficient allegations
a.
b.
c.

8.

COURT, Rule 16, sec. 1, par. (h)

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 16, sec. 1, par. (i)

RULES OF COURT, Rule 16, sec. 1, par. (j)

CIVIL CODE, art. 222
Mendoza v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-23102, April
24, 1967, 19 SCRA 756 (1967)

Lack of certification against forum shopping

a.

12.

OF

Non-compliance with a condition precedent for filing

a.
b.
c.

11.

RULES

Statute of frauds
a.

10.

RULES OF COURT, Rule 16, sec. 1, par. (g)

Marcopper Mining Corp. v. Garcia, G.R. No. L-55935,
July 30, 1986, 143 SCRA 178 (1986)
Fluor Daniel, Inc. Philippines v. E.B. Villarosa &
Partners Co., Ltd., G.R. No. 159648, July 27, 2007, 528
SCRA 321 (2007)

Payment, waiver, abandonment or extinction

a.

9.

Litton Mills, Inc. v. Galleon Trader, Inc., G.R. No. L40867, July 26, 1988, 163 SCRA 489 (1988)
Ayala Corporation v. Rosa-Diana Realty & Development
Corporation, G.R. No. 134284, December 1, 2000, 346
SCRA 663 (2000)

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 7, sec. 5

Procedure on motion to dismiss

22

a.
b.

B.

Motion to suspend proceedings

1.

Need for prior arbitration

a.

C.

D.

Need for prior reference to barangay conciliation

3.

RULES

COURT, Rule 30, sec. 8

1.

RULES

2.

Bantillo v. Intermediate Appellate Court, G.R. No. 75311,

October 18, 1988, 166 SCRA 508 (1988)

3.

Virata v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 106527, April 6, 1993, 221

SCRA 52 (1993)

OF

COURT, Rule 12

Motion to drop/add parties

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 3, sec. 11

Motion to severe cause of action

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 2, sec. 6

Motion to strike out

1.

G.

OF

Motion for bill of particulars

1.
F.

Bengson v.Chan, et al., G.R. No. L-27283, July 29,

1977, 78 SCRA 113 (1977)

2.

1.
E.

RULES OF COURT, Rule 16, secs. 2-6

Malicdem v. Flores, G.R. No. 151001, September 8,
2006, 501 SCRA 248 (2006)

RULES OF COURT, Rule 8, sec. 12; Rule 7, sec. 3; Rule 12, sec.
4; Rule 29, sec. 3, par. (c)

Motion for judgment on the pleadings

23

H.

X.

1.

RULES

2.

Mongao v. Pryce Properties Corporation, G.R. No. 156474,

August 16, 2005, 407 SCRA 201 (2005)

OF

COURT, Rule 34

Motion for summary judgment

1.

RULES

2.

Estrada v. Consolacion, G.R. No. L-40948, June 29, 1976, 71

SCRA 523 (1976)

3.

Nocom v. Camerino, G.R. No. 182984, February 10, 2009, 578

SCRA 390 (2009)

OF

COURT, Rule 35

DISMISSALS AND DEFAULTS

A.

B.

Dismissals
1.

RULES

2.

Republic Planters Bank v. Molina, G.R. No. 54287, September

28, 1988, 166 SCRA 39 (1988)

3.

Pinga v. Santiago, G.R. No. 170354, June 30, 2006, 494 SCRA
393 (2006)

OF

COURT, Rule 17

Defaults
1.

RULES

2.

Co v. Acosta, G.R. No. 64591, January 17, 1985, 134 SCRA

185 (1985)

3.

Lina v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 63397, April 9, 1985, 135

SCRA 637 (1985)

4.

Boticano v. Chu, Jr., G.R. No. 58036, March 16, 1987, 148
SCRA 541 (1987)

OF

COURT, Rule 9, sec. 3

24

5.

XI.

Denso (Phils.), Inc. v. Intermediate Appellate Court, G.R. No.

75000, February 27, 1987, 148 SCRA 280 (1987)

PROVISIONAL REMEDIES
A.

B.

C.

Notice of lis pendens

1.

RULES

2.

CIVIL CODE, art. 1381, par. (4)

3.

Spouses Po Lam v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 116220,

December 6, 2000, 347 SCRA 86 (2000)

OF

COURT, Rule 13, sec. 14

Preliminary attachment
1.

RULES

2.

CIVIL CODE, art. 1387

3.

Philippine British Assurance Co., Inc. v. Intermediate

Appellate Court, G.R. No. 72005, May 29, 1987, SCRA 520
(1987)

4.

International Container Terminal Services, Inc. v. Court of

Appeals, G.R. No. 90530, October 7, 1992, 214 SCRA 456
(1992)

5.

Davao Light and Power Co. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

93262, November 29, 1991, 204 SCRA 343 (1991)

6.

Security Pacific Assurance v. Tria-Infante, G.R. No. 144740,

August 31, 2005, 468 SCRA 526 (2005)

OF

COURT, Rule 57; Appendix of Forms, Form 16

Preliminary injunction
1.

RULES

2.

A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC, December 4, 2007

OF

COURT, Rule 58

25

D.

3.

Brocka, et al. v. Enrile, et al., G.R. Nos. 69863-65, December

10, 1990, 192 SCRA 183 (1990)

4.

Social Justice Society, et al. v. Atienza, G.R. No. 156052,

February 13, 2008, 545 SCRA 92 (2008)

5.

Philippine Ports Authority v. Pier 8 Arrastre and Stevedoring

Services, Inc., G.R. No. 147861, November 18, 2005, 475
SCRA 426 (2005)

6.

Rep. Act No. 8975 (2000)

7.

Rep. Act No. 9136 (2001), sec. 78

Receivership
1.

E.

F.

XII.

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 59

OF

COURT, Rule 60

Replevin
1.

RULES

2.

Vda. De Danao v. Ginete, A.M. No. MTJ-03-1474, January 21,

2003, 395 SCRA 542 (2003)

Support pendente lite

1.

RULES

2.

Lam v. Chua, G.R. No. 131286, March 18, 2004, 426 SCRA 29
(2004)

OF

COURT, Rule 61

DISCOVERY
A.

Generally
1.

B.

Republic v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 90478, November 21, 1991,

204 SCRA 212 (1991)

Depositions

26

C.

1.

RULES

2.

Fortune Corporation v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 108119,

January 19, 1994, 229 SCRA 355 (1994)

3.

Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Cruz, G.R. No. 137136, November

3, 1999, 317 SCRA 761 (1999)

E.

OF

COURT, Rule 25

1.

RULES

2.

Briboneria v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 101682, December 14,

1992, 216 SCRA 607 (1992)

OF

COURT, Rule 26

Production or inspection of documents or things

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 27

Physical and mental examinations of persons

1.

G.

RULES

Request for admissions

1.
F.

COURT, Rules 23 and 24

Interrogatories to parties
1.

D.

OF

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 28

Sanctions for refusal to make discovery

1.

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 29

XIII. PRE-TRIAL
A.

When conducted
1.

B.

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 18, sec. 1

Nature and purpose

27

C.

D.

1.

RULES

2.

Tiu v. Middleton, G.R. No. 134998, July 19, 1999, 310 SCRA
580 (1999)

COURT, Rule 18, sec. 2

Pre-trial brief
1.

RULES

2.

A.M. No. 03-1-09-SC, July 13, 2004

OF

COURT, Rule 18, sec. 6

Appearance of parties
1.

E.

OF

RULES
sec. 3

OF

COURT, Rule 18, secs. 4 & 5; Rule 17, sec. 3; Rule 9,

Procedure and Court-Annexed Mediation and Judicial Dispute

Resolution
1.

RULES

2.

A.M. No. 03-1-09-SC, July 13, 2004

3.

A.M. No. 01-10-5-SC-PHILJA, October 16, 2001

4.

Admin. Order No. 59-2005, April 26, 2005

5.

A.M. No. 11-1-6-SC-PHILJA, 11 January 2011

6.

Philippine Transmarine Carrier Inc. v. Court of Appeals, G.R.

No. 122346, February 18, 2000, 326 SCRA 18 (2000)

7.

Goldloop Properties, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 99431,

August 11, 1992, 212 SCRA 498 (1992)

8.

Citibank N.A. v. Chua, G.R. No. 102300, March 17, 1993, 220
SCRA 75 (1993)

XIV. TRIAL

OF

COURT, Rule 18, secs. 1, 3, 6, 7; Rule 9, sec. 3

28

A.

B.

Calendar and assignment of cases

1.

RULES

2.

Batas Blg. 129 (1980), sec. 16

E.

XV.

RULES OF COURT, Rules 30 & 31; Rule 135, secs. 2 & 7; Rule
136, secs. 6 and 17

Trial by commissioner
1.

D.

COURT, Rule 20; Rule 135, sec. 1

Trial
1.

C.

OF

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 32

OF

COURT, Rule 21; Rule 135, sec. 5 (e); Rule 141, sec.

Subpoena
1.

RULES
13

2.

Batas Blg. 129 (1980), sec.38 (2)

Demurrer to evidence
1.

RULES

2.

Radiowealth Finance Co. v. Spouses Del Rosario, G.R. No.

138739, July 6, 2000, 335 SCRA 288 (2000)

OF

COURT, Rule 33

JUDGMENTS
A.

B.

Judgments on the merits

1.

RULES

2.

CONST., art. VIII, sec. 14

3.

Batas Blg. 129 (1980), sec. 38, par. (1) and sec. 40

OF

COURT, Rule 36; Rule 135, sec. 9; Rule 136, sec. 9

Judgments by compromise

29

C.

D.

E.

1.

California Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. City of Las Pias,

et al., G.R. No. 178461, June 22, 2009

2.

Philippine National Bank v. Banatao, et al., G.R. No. 149221,

April 7, 2009

Judgment by confession
1.

FAMILY CODE, art. 48

2.

Philippine National Bank v. Manila Oil Refining & ByProducts Company, Inc., 43 Phil. 444 (1922)

Nunc pro tunc judgments

1.

Lichauco v. Tan Pho, 51 Phil. 862 (1923)

2.

Briones-Vasquez v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 144882,

February 4, 2005, 450 SCRA 482 (2005)

Judgment for costs

1.

F.

G.

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 142

Declaratory judgments
1.

RULES

2.

Baguio Citizens Action, Inc. v. City Council, G.R. No. L-27247,

April 20, 1983, 121 SCRA 368 (1983)

3.

Matalin Coconut Co., Inc. v. Mun. Council of Malabang,

Lanao del Sur, G.R. No. L-28138, August 13, 1986, 143 SCRA
404 (1986)

OF

COURT, Rule 63

Foreign judgments
1.

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 39, sec. 48

30

XVI. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF TRIAL COURT ERRORS

A.

Review and correction by the trial court of its own proceedings

1.

Motion for reconsideration or for new trial

a.

2.

b.

COURT, Rule 37

RULES OF COURT, Rule 38

Service Specialists, Inc. v. Sheriff of Manila, G.R. No.
74586, October 17, 1986, 145 SCRA 139 (1986)

Review and correction by another court in an independent action

1.

Direct attack
a.
b.

2.

3.

Batas Blg. 129 (1980), sec. 9, par. (2)

RULES OF COURT, Rule 47

Certiorari, prohibition and mandamus

a.

C.

OF

Petition for relief

A.

B.

RULES

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 65

Collateral attack

Appellate proceedings; review and correction by another court on

appeal
1.

Appeal from inferior courts to RTC

a.
b.
c.

2.

RULES OF COURT, Rule 40

Batas Blg. 129 (1980), secs. 22 and 39
Revised Rule on Summary Procedure (1991), sec. 22 par.
(c)

Appeal from RTC to CA

31

a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.

i.
j.

k.

3.

Appeals from specialized tribunals/agencies

a.
b.

4.

RULES OF COURT, Rules 41 and 42

A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC, December 4, 2007
Batas Blg. 129 (1980), secs. 39, 3 to 12
Mayor v. Intermediate Appellate Court, G.R. No. 74410,
May 4, 1988, 161 SCRA 63 (1988)
Merino v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-38337, August
25, 1983, 124 SCRA 248 (1983)
De la Cruz v. Paras, G.R. No. L-41053, February 27,
1976, 69 SCRA 556 (1976)
Universal Motors Corp. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
47432, January 27, 1992, 205 SCRA 448 (1992)
Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No. 111324, July 5, 1996, 258 SCRA
186 (1996)
Neypes v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 141524, September
14, 2005, 469 SCRA 633 (2005)
First Aqua Sugar Traders, Inc. v. Bank of the Philippine
Islands, G.R. No. 154034, February 5, 2007, 514 SCRA
223 (2007)
Ko v. Philippine National Bank, G.R. Nos. 169131-32,
January 20, 2006, 479 SCRA 298 (2006)

RULES OF COURT, Rule 43

Basmayor v. Atencio, G.R. No. 160573, October 19, 2005,
473 SCRA 382 (2005)

Appeals to the Supreme Court

a.
b.
c.
d.
e.

f.

RULES OF COURT, Rule 45

A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC, December 4, 2007
CONST., art. VIII, sec. 5, par. (2)
Gamiao v. Plan, G.R. No. L-57102, June 29, 1982, 114
SCRA 907 (1982)
Cebu Stevedoring Co., Inc. v. Ramolete, G.R. No. L56627, August 17, 1981, 106 SCRA 638 at 645-647
(1981)
Agote v. Lorenzo, G.R. No. 142675, July 22, 2005, 464
SCRA 60 (2005)

32

5.

Procedure in the CA and in the Supreme Court

a.
b.
c.
d.

D.

RULES OF COURT, Rules 44-56

CONST., art. VIII, secs. 4, 13 & 15
Republic Act No. 296 (1948), as amended, secs. 9, 10,
18, 23, 31
Batas Blg. 129 (1980), secs. 4, 8, 10-12 and 40

Extraordinary remedies (prerogative writs: certiorari, prohibition

and mandamus as modes of review)
1.

RULES

2.

A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC, December 4, 2007

3.

St. Peter Memorial Park, Inc. v. Campos, G.R. No. L-38280,

March 21, 1975, 63 SCRA 180 (1975)

4.

Mercado v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-44001, June 10,

1988, 162 SCRA 75 (1988)

5.

BA Finance Corp. v. Pineda, G.R. No. L-61628, December 29,

1982, 119 SCRA 493 (1982)

6.

Philippine Rabbit Bus Lines v. Goimco, G.R. No. 135507,

November 29, 2005, 476 SCRA 361 (2005)

7.

Cervantes v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 166755, November 18,

2005, 475 SCRA 562 (2005)

8.

Ang Biat Huan Sons Industries, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, G.R.

No. 154837, March 22, 2007, 518 SCRA 697 (2007)

9.

Longino v. General, G.R. No. 147956, February 16, 2005, 451

SCRA 423 (2005)

10.

Calim v. Guerrero, G.R. No. 156527, March 5, 2007, 517 SCRA

412 (2007)

OF

COURT, Rule 65

33

XVII. ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS

A.

B.

Execution
1.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Visayan

Company, G.R. No. L-24921, 31 March 1967

2.

Heirs of Mateo Pidacan v. Air Transportation Office, G.R. No.

186192, 25 August 2010

3.

Philippine Airlines, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-49188,

30 January 1990

When execution proper

1.

Upon final judgments or orders

a.

2.

c.

3.

COURT, Rule 39, secs. 1, 46-48

RULES OF COURT, Rule 39, secs. 2 and 5

Universal Far East Corp. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L64931, August 31, 1984, 131 SCRA 642 (1984)
Ong v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 92241, October 17,
1991, 203 SCRA 38 (1991)

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 39, secs. 3 and 4

By motion or independent action

a.

5.

OF

Stay of execution
a.

4.

RULES

Pending appeal
a.
b.

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 39, sec. 6

Execution in case of death of party

a.

C.

Electric

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 39, sec. 7

Form and contents of execution writ

34

D.

1.

RULES

2.

National Power Corporation v. Omar Maruhom, et al., G.R. No.

183297, 23 December 2009

3.

Leo Gonzales v. Solid Cement Corporation, G.R. No. 198423,

23 October 2012

I.

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 39, sec. 10

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 39, sec. 11

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 39, sec. 14

Property exempt from execution

1.

RULES

2.

FAMILY CODE, arts. 152, 153, 155, 157, 160

3.

Rep. Act No. 4917 (1967)

OF

COURT, Rule 39, sec. 13

Efect of levy on execution

1.

J.

COURT, Rule 39, sec. 9

Return of writ of execution

1.

H.

OF

Execution of special judgments

1.

G.

RULES

Execution of judgments from specific act

1.

F.

COURT, Rule 39, sec. 8

Execution of money judgments

1.

E.

OF

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 39, sec. 12

Third-party claims
1.

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 39, Sec. 16

35

K.

L.

M.

N.

2.

Bayer Philippines, Inc. v. Agana, G.R. No. L-38701, April 8,

1975, 63 SCRA 355 (1975)

3.

Northern Motors, Inc. v. Coquia, G.R. No. L-40018, August

29, 1975, 66 SCRA 415 (1975); G.R. No. L-40018,
December 15, 1975, 68 SCRA 374 (1975)

4.

Ong v. Tating, G.R. No. 61042, April 15, 1987, 149 SCRA 265
(1987)

5.

Magdalena Villasi v. Filomeno Garcia, G.R. No. 190106, 15

January 2014

Execution sale
1.

RULES

2.

Cometa v. Intermediate Appellate Court, G.R. No. 69294,

June 30, 1987, 151 SCRA 563 (1987)

OF

COURT, Rule 39, secs. 15, 17-26, 34-35

Redemption from execution sale

1.

RULES

2.

Cenas v. Santos, G.R. No. L-49576, November 21, 1991, 204

SCRA 53 (1991)

3.

Hi-Yield Realty, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 138978,

September 12, 2002, 388 SCRA 655 (2002)

OF

COURT, Rule 39, secs. 27-33

Proceedings supplementary to execution

1.

RULES

2.

The Economic Insurance Co., Inc. v. Torres, G.R. No. L28488, October 21, 1977, 79 SCRA 519 (1977)

OF

COURT, Rule 39, secs. 36-43

Satisfaction of judgment

36

1.

RULES

OF

COURT, Rule 39, secs. 44-45

XVIII. SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS

A.

B.

C.

Quo warranto
1.

RULES

2.

Calleja v. Panday, G.R. No. 168696, February 28, 2006, 483

SCRA 680 (2006)

3.

Unilongo v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 123910, April 5, 1999,

305 SCRA 561 (1999)

OF

COURT, Rule 66

Expropriation
1.

RULES

2.

CONST., art. III, sec. 9

3.

Rep. Act No. 7160 (1991), sec. 19

4.

Zaballero v. National Housing Authority, G.R. Nos. L-4929192, October 29, 1987, 155 SCRA 224 (1987)

5.

Municipality of Bian v. Garcia, G.R. No. 69260, December 22,

1989, 180 SCRA 576 (1989)

6.

National Housing Authority v. Heirs of Guivelondo, G.R. No.

154411, June 19, 2003, 404 SCRA 389 (2003)

OF

COURT, Rule 67

Foreclosure of real estate mortgage

1.

RULES

2.

Rep. Act No. 1300 (1955), sec. 20

3.

Rep. Act No. 8791 (2000), sec. 47

3.

Union Bank v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 134068, June 25,

OF

COURT, Rule 68

37

2001, 359 SCRA 480 (2001)

D.

E.

4.

A.M. No. 99-10-05-0, January 30, 2001

Cf.

CIVIL CODE, art. 2112

Partition
1.

RULES

2.

Sepulveda v. Pelaez, G.R. No. 152195, January 31, 2005, 450

SCRA 302 (2005)

3.

Panganiban, et al. v. Oamil, G.R. No. 149313, January 22,

2008, 542 SCRA 166 (2008)

4.

Marasigan v. Marasigan, G.R. No. 156078, March 14, 2008, 548

SCRA 409 (2008)

OF

COURT, Rule 69

Forcible entry and unlawful detainer

1.

RULES

2.

De Laureano v. Adil, G.R. No. L-43345, July 29, 1976, 72 SCRA

148 (1976)

3.

Lesaca v. Cuevas, G.R. No. L-48419, October 27, 1983, 125

SCRA 384 (1983)

4.

City of Manila v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-42364, April 9,

1987, 149 SCRA 183 (1987)

5.

Barba v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 126638, February 6, 2002,

376 SCRA 210 (2002)

6.

Palattao v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 131726, May 7, 2002,

381 SCRA 681 (2002)

7.

Ross Rica Sales Center, Inc. v. Spouses Ong, G.R. No. 132197,
August 16, 2005, 467 SCRA 35 (2005)

OF

COURT, Rule 70

38

F.

8.

Ganila v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 150755, June 28, 2005,

461 SCRA 435 (2005)

9.

David v. Cordova, G.R. No. 152992, July 28, 2005, 464 SCRA
384 (2005)

10.

Domalsin v. Valenciano, G.R. No. 158687, January 25, 2006, 480

SCRA 114 (2006)

Contempt
1.

RULES

2.

Lipata v. Tutaan, G.R. No. L-61643, September 29, 1983, 124

SCRA 877 (1983)

3.

Heirs of Vda. De Roxas v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 138660,

February 5, 2004, 422 SCRA 101 (2004)

4.

Leonidas v. Supnet, A.M. No. MTJ-02-1433, February 21,

2003, 398 SCRA 38 (2003)

OF

COURT, Rule 71